This is Obama’s War on the Suburbs
Obama wants more government dependents.
Check it out:
Stanley Kurtz said in his interview with me in the Limbaugh Letter, as well as in his book, that this transformation of the suburbs would be a major tenet of Obama’s second term.
Now, when did this border crisis start? Second term. What do we have? We’re being overrun. There’s no end in sight, by the way, and the news is that there’s no end in sight. The governments of Mexico and Guatemala are facilitating the trip north by these kids. There’s no end to this, folks. Nobody’s trying to stop it. Obama’s not trying to stop it. The Republicans aren’t trying to stop it. That’s why this poll is so cockeyed.
And these kids, what’s happening to them? Nobody’s allowed to see. Nobody’s allowed to know, are they? That’s why the governor of Nebraska was a little bit upset when he found out that a bunch of ’em are ending up in his state, which takes us back to Stanley Kurtz. Kurtz makes the point that Obama and the left — and this is true, this is not opinion. They will tell you this if you listen to them. They think people that live in the suburbs — well, they resent them. You’ve heard a term applied to suburbanites called “white flight,” have you not? That’s how Obama looks at it.
Obama, Eric Holder, and many on the left in the Democrat Party think that people in suburbia fled the city to get away from minorities, essentially, to get away from the poor. To get away from dilapidated buildings and crumbling infrastructure. They moved to the suburbs and they formed these communities which are clean and prosperous and it’s not fair because the poor couldn’t leave, the poor were trapped. The upwardly mobile, because of their relative affluence, were able to leave and move.
So Obama has had a war on the suburbs. And do not doubt this. This is something that’s never gonna be in the news. This is something that’s part of the Obama agenda that’s never going to be openly stated, just like he never openly stated that he was for socialized medicine. He did in closed session with his union buddy supporters, but he’ll never put it as part of the agenda.
Now, how this is happening is this. There’s an initiative from the Housing and Urban Development department called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. The concept, as it is properly understood, is to change the enforcement paradigm in order to allow the Department of Housing and Urban Development to essentially decide what every neighborhood in America should look like. Now, if you go, “Come on, Rush.” Let me just ask you to remember something.
How long is it been, in your memory, that you’ve heard Democrats say that diversity is our greatest strength, diversity is our greatest power, and that we must have a government that represents the diversity of America. We must have cabinet department that represents the diversity. We must have a Supreme Court that represents the diversity. You’ve heard this now. And of course diversity means one thing: skin color. It doesn’t mean different rich cultural differences that they want to meld. This is purely skin color.