Clinton and Obama Promised to Protect Disarmed Ukraine from Thugs Like Putin

Ukraine has been left out to dry when they depended on America to keep their promises.
Check it out:

I never want to make the mistake of denying proper responsibility. I mean, the people who shot it down shot it down, and they did it, and whether there was a treaty or not, they did it. The point about the treaty… I remember when I first discovered it and made mention of the news on this program. It was back this spring when this whole thing began.

Until I was reminded of it, I did not know that it existed, and the point is exactly what we’re talking about today. We had pledged to protect Ukraine with a number of other nations, in exchange for the Ukrainians disarming — ’cause we believed that, of course, countries with weapons is a bad thing. We’d get rid of their weapons and that would make them docile.

They would not be aggressors and they’d focus on their domestic circumstances improvement, and in exchange we offered — as the big guy on the block — to defend ’em. The time came, and we weren’t there. It’s part and parcel of the theme that has developed on the program. Now, whether or not that led these people thinking they could shoot the plane down with impunity, I think these Russian terrorists would do something like that anyway, and run the risk of a response.

But the fact that they’re pretty sure there isn’t gonna be one doesn’t help.

I guarantee you.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Previous post

Are the Nexties Rejecting Liberalism?

Next post

Leftists Don't Think the United States Has the Moral Authority to Confront the World's Bad Guys

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.