Court Rules Atheists Failed to Show Words ‘Under God’ Harmed Their Children

About time the freedom from religion people got put in their place. Maybe we can get back to a country of freedom of religion.
Check it out:

An atheist Massachusetts couple failed to prove their children had been harmed by the words “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, the state’s highest court ruled Friday.

The couple, identified only as “John and Jane Doe,” argued their children’s rights were violated by the voluntary recitation of the pledge — including “Under God” — in the public schools in the Acton-Boxborough district. But the Supreme Judicial Court ruled unanimously they failed to make their case, saying they had not proved the children had been subjected to bullying, ostracism or any other punishment or mistreatment for refusing to say the pledge or for keeping quiet while everyone else was saying “Under God.”

The couple sued in state court under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights because the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled on the issue.
Chief Justice Roderick Ireland, who wrote the opinion, also said school officials in the district — which includes two wealthy suburbs northwest of Boston — do not track students’ patriotism, or lack thereof.

“The fact that a school or other public entity operates a voluntary program or offers an activity that offends the religious beliefs of one or more individuals, and leaves them feeling ‘stigmatized’ or ‘excluded’ as a result, does not mean that the program or activity necessarily violates equal protection principles,” Ireland said.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Previous post

Why Didn't Hillary Designate Boko Haram a Terrorist Org?

Next post

China Plans Beijing-United States High-Speed Rail Line

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.