House Pushes Back on Obama’s Nuclear Disarmament Agenda


Obama would have us not have any arms.
Check it out:

The House Armed Services Committee’s (HASC) National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) advances U.S. national interests when it comes to U.S. nuclear weapons.

The bill prohibits elimination of the nuclear triad and limits availability of funds for further nuclear reductions. The President’s previous arms control treaty, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), requires the United States to spend millions of dollars reducing its nuclear weapons and complying with the treaty. It is only prudent to wait and assess the effects of the reductions under New START before conducting yet another round of unilateral nuclear weapons reductions, because the treaty does not provide for predictability, and its degraded verification regime makes it more difficult to assess Russia’s nuclear weapons capabilities. In addition, Russia is in violation of its arms control obligations.

The President stated last year in South Korea that the U.S. already has more nuclear weapons than it needs. This statement was not backed by a sound analysis of the current world and U.S. deterrence requirements. In fact, his plans remain opaque.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Previous post

Al Roker “uncomfortable” with Obama’s Plan B decision

Next post

Backdoor Bailouts Begin

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.