New York Times: Gosnell Trial Inconsequential


Liberals don’t care about the murder of babies. They don’t even think they are people as they treat them like something that can just be thrown away. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that the moralless left doesn’t care about this killer.
Check it out:

For The New York Times, editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal penned an apologia for the progressive media’s disinterest in covering the abortion trial of Kermit Gosnell and essentially claimed that the trial is a meaningless incident when all things are considered, especially when it comes to the overall abortion debate.

“What does the trial of a Philadelphia doctor who is accused of performing illegal late-term abortions by inducing labor and then killing viable fetuses have to do with the debate over legal abortion,” Rosenthal writes.

Rosenthal excuses his paper’s lack of coverage of the Gosnell trial saying that the NYT has written “six articles” already, so this, he believes, means they’ve adequately covered the story. He also maintains that there is “no rule” that a newspaper “has to run one piece about a bad clinic for every piece celebrating a good one.”



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Previous post

FBI: Illinois Teen Tried to Join Al Qaeda, Fight in Syria

Next post

Secret Emails: 'Use Boston Terror Attacks to Push Immigration Reform'

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.