Lawmakers said Sunday they want to know who had a hand in creating the Obama administration’s now-discredited talking points about the Sept. 11 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and why a final draft omitted the CIA’s early conclusion that terrorists were involved.

The answers could explain why President Barack Obama and top aides, including UN Ambassador Susan Rice, described the attack for days afterward as a protest against an anti-Islam video that spontaneously turned violent and why they played down any potential link to al Qaeda, despite evidence to the contrary.

Administration officials have defended the portrayal of the attack as relying on the best information available at the time that didn’t compromise classified intelligence. Democrats say CIA and other intelligence officials signed off on the final talking points.

Continue reading on www.nypost.com

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Email
Previous post

Newt: Obama Believes ‘Your Money Belongs To The Government Unless They Decide To Leave It With You’

Next post

Steven Crowder: Israel vs the World!!