Unbelievable! NRCC Fundraises Off of Decision, Agrees It Wasn’t the Court’s Role to Defend the US Constitution

I just got something, an e-mail — a fundraising e-mail — from the National Republican Fundraising Committee. And it kind of dovetails. You’ve probably heard some conservative commentators marveling at Roberts. He either saved the court from this charge of activism or whatever. I’m here to tell you that the reason, in these particular pieces, that you have seen people praising Justice Roberts is very simple and very narrow. It’s for one reason. He came up with something they didn’t think of.

And who would have?

You’ve got the US Congress passing a health care bill that is based on the Commerce Clause being stretched to now say that the government can mandate that we buy or not buy something. That is how this case was presented. It is how this case was argued. It is how this case was presented to the American public. It is how everybody thought this case was going to be decided. So all the pundits started predicting their outcomes. “Oh, yeah, it’s gonna go 6-3 with Roberts and Kennedy writing for the majority. Roberts will see what Kennedy does and he’ll go that way to make sure the court’s reputation is protected.”



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Previous post

Why Didn't John Roberts "Stretch" to Find Arizona's Law Enforcing Federal Immigration Statutes Constitutional?

Next post

I Am Literally Sick Over This Obamacare Travesty

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.