Newt Hammers CNN On Birth Control Question: You Never Asked Obama Why He Voted For Infanticide

Posted on February 22, 2012 by Conservative Byte

Continue Reading on www.breitbart.tv ...

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • True Patriot

    Way to go Newt Gingrich. Newt is doing it right. He’s attacking and vetting Obozo which the lying, lamstream media refuses to do. That proves they are biased. Romney is busy wasting his money in attack ads against Santorum and Gingrich. They should be attacking the usurper in our White House. I think this is gonna give Gingrich some brownie points amongst the voters. See website: http://www.haasstrep68.com

    • Curmudgeon

      4 APRIL 2002, STATE OF ILLINOIS, 92ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY:

      Here is an audio recording of Illinois Senator Barack Obama arguing against SB 1663, and thus arguing against giving life-care to a living infant:
      http://www.jillstanek.com/29383467.wav

      Obama opposed SB1663 arguing he had “confidence” that the abortionist – who was invested in attempting to kill the child pre-delivery – would not mind revealing his or her botched procedure, by calling in a 2nd physician to ensure that the child was given proper medical attention and revived if possible.

      Obama thought it remarkable to suspect an abortionist of having a subjective medical opinion about his new second patient. It didn’t seem to occur to Obama that the abortionist might also be invested in seeing the baby dead, to preclude malpractice lawsuits down the road if the baby were found not to have pre-birth diagnosed defects, an overriding reason for these late-term induced labor abortions.

      But Obama’s most telling statement from the clip was to say this bill “is really designed simply to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.”

      In other words, if a baby were to survive his or her abortion (and officially become a living human being), Obama is saying that the original death plan marked out for this child was expected to be carried out, nonetheless.

      **************************

      CONTEXT OF OBAMA’S ABOVE COMMENTS:
      http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/08/baipaobamamp3.html

      2000 Interview – Nurse Jill Stanek Describes Partial Birth Abortion Procedures:
      http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2007/09/stanek_on_the_o.html

      **************************

  • BruceD

    Win or loose, Newt has called the MSM out on their bias. Hopefully people will get it that they have been duped by the media in 2008 and 2012 if they don’t look out.

    • JimTroop

      My, My, My there is no bias for Rush, Glen, Hannity, all of Fox but there is at MSNBC. How funny. The infancide rant will mystify anyone who tries to understand Newt. For all your extremists and far right guys it is self evident. Trust me, women including those who have jobs, kids, Christian, are very turned off by all the talk of invading our health care. The support for abortion is very strong. Most understand that abortion is a perfectly legal, personal decision and almost everyone would surely think abortion should be limted to early pregnancy. Partial birth abortion is only performed to save a woman’s life. A whole lot of women would support that. But not Christian zealot men. Lucky for them, losing their life while carrying a baby will not happen. Hence they can legislate all they want. Obama supported not prosecuting docs as Newt threw out. Nice try. You grumpy old men do not have even a small % of the eligible voters (but then that includes all those Dem dead voters!)

      • http://pjtv.com skip gainer

        Jim Troop you still do not get it, the issue is not abortion or birth control pills. This is about our first amendment right but I guess you have never read or understood our Constitution. You believe the lie that our Constitution is old and not up to date for the 21st century. Our Constitution is more prevalent today than the day it was signed. This is exactly what our founders were trying to protect us from a dictatorial government. If the democrats care so much about the poor, why do they kill so many poor babies? What ever happened to taking responsibility for your actions. Jim a women forfeits her rights when she spreads her legs and the men all so when they have impregnated a women, it is their responsibility to take care of that child not kill it for convince.

        • http://julienbrightsidesart.blogspot.com/ Anders

          Which part of the first amendment are you referring to?

          • Arthur

            The first part: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ”

            Not using birth control is the free exercise of the Roman Catholic faith. Congress is interfering in Catholics free exericise of their faith in forcing Obamacare.

          • http://pjtv.com skip gainer

            bumd ass

      • karen

        Do you even know what infanticide is ?

      • sally

        Mr. Troop -
        The point being made was not just about abortion. It was about a bill in the Illinois state legislature on whether or not a child that has *survived* the abortion process should or should not be allowed to stay alive.
        Until that bill was introduced, those pitiful children were, literally, placed into a closet at the hospital and denied food or water. The child stayed there until it died. The nursing staff was forbidden to do anything to help a living creature stay alive.
        In a bill to prohibit this form of *abortion*, State Senator Barack Hussein Obama cast the sole vote against the bill becoming law.

      • pete0097

        He wasn’t talking about killing a fetus, he was talking about killing a baby that had come out of the mother alive and breathing. There is a huge difference that obama and the liberal doesn’t see.

      • http://tmarcum@yahoo.com Terry Marcum

        Spoken like like a true Marxist. Who is really the zealot here you better look in the mirror.

      • el_loco_jp

        Way to go Jim. Another left-wing rant based on lies and half truths. Any woman has the opportunity, means and methods to NOT get pregnant if she so desires. She does NOT have the “right” to take the life of an innocent infant as a matter of convenience. You cannot, I repeat, cannot cite a single instance of a responsible American woman who has died from an unwanted pregnancy. C-sections have saved all those who have suffered serious complications during pregnancy. In addition, if the baby is unwanted, there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of loving couples that would give almost anything to adopt that child. Since the majority of abortions are performed on black babies and you support these procedure, you are obviously a racist who supports black genocide.

      • http://patriotupdate.com Floyd Branscomb Jr

        What part of “thou shalt not kill” do you not understand? You evidently don’t understand that there is a REAL heaven and a REAL hell. The Bible is the infalible word of God and it also says NO murderer shall enter the kingdom of heaven, That leaving one place left to go, HELL.

      • Aristophanes

        jimtroop – by your name I would say you are a male. And, as typical of a liberal, you think you know everything about what anyone (including WOMEN) would support or not support.
        Well, I am a woman. And I find your remarks condescending, arrogant, and really stupid!! A CHRISTIAN woman would NOT support abortion, no matter what. You are trying to say these “partial birth abortions” (i.e., murder) are to save the woman’s life? Okay, for the sake of argument, let’s say you are right. So, how would that justify killing a viable baby AFTER the “partial birth abortion”? So much for your so-called logic and argument.
        And stop trying to say what women think – you have no clue. Typical liberal – you think you know everything when you know nothing.
        And, also, about Limbaugh, Hannity, etc. – liberals are trying to get them off the air – do you see conservatives trying to get liberals (Maddow, Matthews, etc.) off the air? No – we are not listening to the liberal crap. And, gee, Fox’s ratings are so much better than cnn, msnbc, abc, cbs, etc!
        Get a brain and use it!!!!

      • Linda

        O come on, now. Let’s not prevaricate. You are intelligent enough to know a late term abortion is not for the life of the mother-but for convenience and reasons not related to the life of the mother. Birthing is necessary, isn’t it? How else will the baby, the little innocent human being be gotten out but by some form of birth?
        You don’t mind shedding innocent blood, or torture, do you?

      • big jack

        No matter how you try to disguise it, murder is murder. I guess it is fortunate for you that your mother decided to have you. Unfortunately for us. We are probably taking care of you.

      • http://AUTORECYCLINGMALLMALL.NET TOM

        YOU MAY BE SURPRISED COME ELECTION YOU YOUNG WHIPPER SNAPPER.US OLD FARTS MIGHT JUST GET IT DONE.

      • Peter

        JimTroop, HEAD OBAMA SHEEP! Did you not listen to obama urging his fellow Senators to “let nature take its course”? In other words, put the suffering baby aside and let the poor child SUFFER to death. WHAT THE F is wrong with you and obama sheep? You have no concern for the MURDER of your own kind! Your sick! Oh thats right, obama is now the self proclaimed dictator and Fuher, lets hear it JimTroop, “SIEG HEIL OBAMA, SIEG HEIL OBAMA, SIEG HEIL OBAMA”, baa baa whatever Der Fuher says we must follow”! Amazing, Barry couldn’t run a Lemonaide stand, you blithering fool!!

    • RacerJim

      The MSM won the 2008 for Obama by neither vetting him or taking him to task on his numerous and repeated gross misrepresentations, obfuscations and outright lies. Newt is the only GOP candidate who has repeatedly called out the MSM on their obvious bias for Obama and would also do so as the GOP nominee.

      Newt 2012

  • Shawn

    I’m not a political strategist, nor do I want to be, but it seems glaringly clear the way to beat the bamster is to attack CNN, MSNBC, ABC, et al. Start with them–work your way thru the tax cheat Geithner, the racist Holder, the brain dead JoeVP all the way up the chain to the punk in the white house. How in the world can republicans lose this election!!!

    • JimTroop

      Obama favorable rating = 50%. Hispanics beccause of Rep immigration stand will not vote for Rep. Of course not blacks. You are losing a huge gender vote by the total emphasis on small government men telling women what to do with their bodies. That includes soccer moms, who work hard, go to church and don’t have time to spend watching unbiased Fox or Glen, Rush, et al. Obama got them their 2% tax cut which will help buy something extra this week, unemployment got extended to maybe some of her friends who really aren’t home smoking dope. Do the math. Attacking CNN, MSNBC, NBC (where people watch the Good Wife)? Really? that’s going to make hard working, moderat voters vote for a white liberal Rep. Don’t think so. Delusional is a good word.

      • Greg Malone

        Jim, Do you really think the $40 tab BREAK that you speak of (that will JUST about fill the Tank as it soars OVER $5 a gal)

        BAMBAMs over 50% rating that you are so proud of is the only thing he has to be proud of in his administration.

        What IS going to aide (how did you put it?) :hard working, moderat voters vote for a white liberal Rep.” simple…………a good, Conservative, HONEST, Christian Patriot.

        God Bless you and your cynical attitude. The United States of America does NOT have to sacrifice our morals for a small percentage of Americans who CHOOSE not to have any.

        • Linda

          Excellent statement.

      • RacerJim

        2/1/2012 – 2/21/2012
        Real Clear Politics’ AVERAGE Obama Approval Rating = 48.9%
        Real Clear Politics’ AVERAGE Obama Disapproval Rating = 46.8%

        1/27/2009
        Real Clear Politics’ AVERAGE Obama Approval Rating = 63.3%
        Real Clear Politics’ AVERAGE Obama Disapproval Rating = 20.0%

        Delusional is indeed a good word.

        • Linda

          The nation has NOT gone to pot, There are more than 50% of this nation who are still moral and have strong values. We find they cannot overcome easily the crooked tactics to obsfucate the statistics or votes by criminals.

      • el_loco_jp

        Jim, you set new standards for short sighted ignorance and naivete. That 2% tax cut will be gobbled by Odumbo’s 20% tax hike on those same hard working, church going “soccer moms”. When Newt, and all the others, point out the bias and falsehoods perpetrated by the MSM (main stream media for dummies like you) these truths hack away the facade of veracity and respectability of the MSM. Very quickly, the MSM loses all its influence over these, so called, “moderat (sic.) voters” and they realize that their support for Obummer and his socialist agenda is misplaced and decide to oppose him and all he stands for. Odummy has 3 chances for reelection … slim, none and fat.

      • Linda

        The blacks have discredited their intelligence to hang with Democrats so tight…to support BO. They behave as though they have no capacity to deduct with reason. Surely there is a conscience and some education to put together the sequences of history and government. We must remember the traumas of the peoples of color under the Socialist dictatorships. God bless ‘em if they get what they think is their way. Bloodshed will be equally divided.

        • Linda

          “Moderation?” how? it sounds ‘racist’? Nothing said which is truthful and offends some is left out of the category of ‘racist’. Fortunately, we have the 1st Amendment in the Bill of Rights. We want to be “One”, but if one block of people stick to a direction which is destroying our nation, I am unimpressed with their worldview.
          In my book, “Peace” does not mean submission to Allah.

    • el_loco_jp

      Amen, Shawn!

  • Myopinion

    Yes Newt is the only one that is not afraid to put the media crap back in their lap, He will be the only one that will put Obama back peddling.

    • Kookie

      I agree. Newt is the only one going after Obummer and is not afraid to tell them off.

  • James Brown

    Jim Dupe is obviously a demorat shill.

  • http://housewife Chai K.

    Yes, only Newt can beat Obama and the words infanticide it means killing the baby. I think Mr. Gingrich did a good job and he maintain to make the debate focus only in Obama and to make
    the candidate not to fight to each other. He done that before until Romney start doing his nasty negative add against him. The way I look at it with Romney he can not take to be defeated and he will do everything in his power to destroyed his opponent and now he is doing it with Rick
    Santorum , he destroyed Gingrich but he make a mistake he thought Gingrich will step down
    and now he will losing. I have never trust him and somehow something about him it doesn’t fit right and his policies and his agenda way to off. He always said I did this and that always me me
    nothing about what he will do for the country.I for one will stick with Gingrich and I do believe he will win the nominee. Vote for Newt Gingrich.

    • RichieT

      In last nights debate, Newt was the one that stood out to be the most presidental of the four, none of the others even came close to his governmental knowledge. Newt was able to say and explain his answers of the questions while using only 1/4 the words that it took for the rest of them, especially Romney who kept ranting on and on and only saying what we already heard from him. In my opion Santorum blew it last night.
      After the debate, I watched the newscasters trying very desperately to avoid mentioning Newt Gingrichs name. That just proves to me that they, the democrats and Obama are deathly afraid of Newt. If they lessens Newts importance–maybe he’ll go away. Hang in there Newt–you got my vote!

  • luvmyus

    I want BO and the liberal democrats to stay out of my religion. Stay out of my bedroom.. Period. Better yet… Stay out of life.. Newt in 2012 to expose who and what was elected to be president in 2008!. Do we have a wanna be dictator in the White House?

  • M. Carlson

    Are all you anti birth control people ready to step up and pay the welfare and free medical fro all the unlimited population growth you desire? All those who want to control the women but not pay are hypocrites. And why is it always men who bring this up?

    • http://www.gemfountains.com Proud Patriot

      Please tell me why I should pay for “free” birth control for anyone who wants it which makes my premiums higher and my out of pocket expense so high I cannot seek the medical help I need.
      Any one you ever heard of personal responsibilty? You want to hae sex with anyone anytime- then pay for your own birth control or don’t have sex!

  • STOPTHEMADNESS

    Obama’s approval rating is at 50% just like unemployment is only 8.3% . I call Bullsh*t on both.

    • Curmudgeon

      Obama’s approval rating is where it is, strictly because he and the Mainstream Media are lying. If they really told an educated public the truth about what’s going on, his approval rating would be less than 10%.

      Today’s quoted unemployment figure is way too low, strictly because the Obama administration and the Mainstream Media are lying. If they really told the public the truth, the actual unemployment figure would be over 20%.

      THEY ARE LYING. THE OVERLY-TRUSTING PUBLIC, UNABLE TO SEE, RECOGNIZE AND UNDERSTAND SUCH UNDERHANDED BEHAVIOR, IS SWALLOWING THOSE LIES, HOOK, LINE AND SINKER.

  • http://www.gemfountains.com Proud Patriot

    This was the number one reason I could not vote for him in 2008. Anyone that has no respect for life, has no right to be in our White House.

  • Jane

    Yea for Newt. Obama has NEVER been asked any tough questions. This is a total one sided media with the exception of fox or cspa. I can’t even watch CNN abc NBC CBS msnbc.
    I don’t know how these people sleep at night !!!

  • Hubcap

    Newt wasn’t given as much time as the others but when he spoke everyone listened and learned. Newt is smarter than the rest of them put together. Little Romney and his pencil made me laugh. Santorum didn’t recognize he was being squeezed by Ron Paul on one side and cry baby spoiled liar Mittens on the other side. All indications would be for Ron Paul to step aside but he carries a pro-Romney message and probably is paid well to do so. Gingrich speaks for himself and knows how to spot the baloney.

  • tweety

    I’ve got to respond to that nut, Jim Troop. I’m a Catholic woman who has never used contraceptives. Thought I didn’t exist? When Obama first introduced his health care bill, he said that no abortions would be funded. Now we see that they ARE funded, just hidden under the contraceptive banner. Some of these contraceptives are abortion-inducing. The Pro-choice crowd always like to crow about women’s health and “preventive care.” I used to think along these lines awhile back, until I saw that commercial that seemed to indicate that having that long-desired trip to Paris was better than having kids. For 99% of abortions done, it’s for the convenience or easy way out for the mother. How many are actually near death? I’m willing to have my insurance pay for other people’s legitimate illnesses, but abortions, no. If women want to be Pro-choice, let them choose NOT to sleep with someone. Then they’ll avoid these dilemmas. It’s NOT IMPOSSIBLE.

  • Patriot Diva

    While I’m not a big fan of Newt’s, he sure can debate! Glad he brought up the infanticide issue.

  • http://housewife Chai K.

    I was born Catholic and we do not believe in birth control we believe in faith and if God willing
    he will grant your wish. We also believe that marriage is between a man and a women, we believe that before having sex we must get married first. We respect our elders and follow the rule as a Catholic we must not do the adultery . Catholic doesn’t believe in divorce and where I came from
    marriage is life until death. But we are not perfect we make mistake too like everybody else for example if you do adultery outside your marriage and having kids outside , your kids will be a bastard and he will not carry his name because he can not marry again. And if you are not Catholic and you are marrying a Catholic women or man he or she has to convert his or her religion however, I do not know about here (U.S.A.) and in Catholic you are not permitted to take communion , or if you are not confess your sin yet. I do not understand why they make so much puss about this, it’s very simple to solve the problem if you are not ready to take responsibility don’t mess around and if you want to take birth control it is your responsibility to buy your own protection. We the taxpayer are not responsible for your own action.

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/My-GVO-team/117634868264657?sk=app_2309869772 julie

    if you are found guilty of murder,you are a murder right?so why is this Infanticide not on trial?
    because a woman feels she can have an intimate fling,and there is no consequence?ill just abort the human being and murder.this is my right,i am a woman.well perhaps you can be more non animal and get birth control or use protection.this is insane folks.can i murder you for my own selfish reasons?what the baby doesnt count?well in the end we all meet our maker.and the child we murdered moments before being cast into hell.i wonder if quite a few human beings even have a soul anymore?and some of you anti smokers worry about 2nd hand smoke,hay you think you have rights?what about that murdered child he or she never had a choice to live or die you made it for them.so dont judge others we all have imperfections i thank GOD mine is not murder.any one got any ideas how to stop this act on innocent babys being murdered.count me in.

  • http://yahoo James

    What democrats don’t seem to realize from any discourse is that the social issuses about contaception, et al, were put out there as a plant from the administration to George Stephanopholos, who has a history with Obama from Harvard days, who stealthily inserts it into public discourse to get the mind of their base off of the economy and fast and furious, and all the other bad news to believe that the repubs want to impose something on them once again, when it is the other way around. Listen liberals. It is not about anything but gov’t intrusion. The liberals are the only ones who ever want to get in people’s personal business.