Conservatives Can Win on Social Issues

Santorum showed up yesterday on Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer. And, folks, it was like Bob Schieffer, who’s, what, 90? Ninety-two? Bob Schieffer talking to Rick Santorum actually appeared as though Schieffer thought Santorum was from Mars. It was a space alien. What he thought, the things he had said, Schieffer could not believe that there was a human being alive on this planet who could think that way, who believed these things. He was shocked. He was stunned. And it goes to show the Republican establishment, clearly the Democrat Party establishment, do not have the slightest ability to relate to even half the country, probably more. They don’t understand us, don’t know us, have mischaracterized us and have lived under these mischaracterizations for so long now that they have just assumed that it’s all true. A guy like Santorum comes along who is simply a devout Catholic, and he’s nothing other than that, may as well be a three-eyed monster.

This Marvin Winans, the pastor at the church of the Whitney Houston funeral, to these guys he probably sounded as scary as Santorum sounds to them. I mentioned James Taranto. Best of the Web today has feature called Weekend Interview, and he talked to a guy named Jeff Bell, who is a well-known and accomplished, achieved social commentator. “Social Issues and the Santorum Surge,” is the title of the piece. Now, I can’t share the whole thing with you because it prints out to over four pages. It starts this way.

“If you’re a Republican in New York or another big city, you may be anxious or even terrified at the prospect that Rick Santorum, the supposedly unelectable social conservative, may win the GOP presidential nomination. Jeffrey Bell would like to set your mind at ease. Social conservatism, Mr. Bell argues in his forthcoming book, ‘The Case for Polarized Politics’ –” He points out, as we have on this program — before I read this to you I’m gonna remind you of this story. It’s the early nineties and I’m a guest at one of these dinner parties out in the Hamptons, and after dinner out on the deck of the host’s home, it’s all Republicans, and many of them huge donors, this was before the ’92 campaign began. And one of these donors comes up to me, pokes me in the chest, “What are you gonna do about the Christians?”

Continue Reading on www.rushlimbaugh.com ...

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Chris

    Keep thinking that you represent half the country. It will be amusing to see your faces after the election when you realize you are maybe 25%, tops.

    • James Thomas

      Lust, greed, and evil are indeed seductive, even sweet, but their aftertaste is bitter and deadly.

      Those of us who put a value on conventional morality may be only 25%, but you might keep in mind the 80/20 Rule. 80% of the benefit or value typically comes from 20% of one’s customers . . . . . which means the remaining 80% only contribute 20% of the benefits or value . . . . I think I know which group you fall into, Chris.

      My prayers and hopes that you can see the light before November.

      • daves

        In a Pennsylvania Press Club luncheon in Harrisburg last summer, Santorum declared, “I am not a libertarian, and I fight very strongly against libertarian influence within the Republican Party and the conservative movement.”

        In that same talk in Harrisburg, he said, “I’ve got some real concerns about this movement within the Republican Party and the Tea Party movement to sort of refashion conservatism and I will vocally and publicly oppose it.”

        • Floyd

          America’s Most Corrupt Politicians
          http://godfatherpolitics.com/2887/americas-most-corrupt-politicians/
          In the list of the top ten most admired men, was none other than President Barack Obama.
          Now Judicial Watch has released the Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians list. To no surprise of my own, President Barack Obama made Judicial Watch’s list along with the nation’s top cop, Attorney General Eric Holder.
          Judicial Watch’s Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians for 2011 are listed in alphabetical order:
          Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL)
          Former Senator John Ensign (R-NV)
          Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL)
          Attorney General Eric Holder (D)
          Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL)
          President Barack Obama (D)
          Rep. Laura Richardson (D-CA)
          Rep. David Rivera (R-FL)
          Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)
          Rep. Don Young (R-AK)
          Dishonorable Mentions for 2011 include:
          Former Senator John Edwards (D-NC)
          Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA)
          Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA)
          Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano (D)
          Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
          Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY)
          Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY)
          Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius (D)
          Note that six of the ten list are Democrats and six of the eight listed on the dishonorable mention are Democrats. That’s 75% of those on both lists are Democrats. That has to say something for the overall mentality of the attitude of being above the law that permeates the Democratic Party.
          As for President Obama making this list and being listed as the most admired man in the country speaks volumes as to just how far American society has declined. Why would a nation of people admire one of the most corrupt politicians of the day and probably in the history of the American presidency?
          Obama has repeatedly defied the US Constitution and federal laws. He ignores the mandates of Congress and the general opinion of the American people and yet they turn around and admire him for it?
          And then there has to be a lot said when the US Attorney General makes it to the Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians list. The man who is supposed to uphold the law turns out to be one of the biggest violators of the law. Every day, more Congressmen and women are calling for his immediate resignation and even more are signing on to a vote of no confidence and yet he sees himself as doing no wrong. Leaving Eric Holder in his role as US Attorney General is like placing a career pedophile in charge of a day care.
          I wish we could post Judicial Watch’s lists of the Ten Most and the Dishonorable Mention outside every polling booth in the nation so that it’s the last thing voters see before placing their votes. Just maybe, it would be enough to change a few votes this next year.

          • Kort Greene

            It’s the only way they can win. God would be with them, amen.

        • Ann Wilson Kingsley

          Thanks Dave! It is horrifying to find out that Santorum is actively campaigning against Libertarianism, the philosophy of Our Founding Fathers. It appears that Progressive NeoCons have completely taken over the Republican Party. For what it is worth, I believe that too many people are starting to question a stance on social issues when much of the need for that focus is eliminated by Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the best philosophy for ending vice and the consequences of vice. Let’s be efficient folks: America is broke. We need to implement the best and least expensive solutions for correcting our fiscal and moral ills.

    • GenoB

      You are referring to the liberal progressives, whether you realize it or not.

    • NancyJ

      I would ask you to name just one (just one) thing that this White House has done that is successful and not harmful to the country.
      He talks well, reads teleprompters well, reduces the defenses of our country well, plays golf (well???), takes trips on our dime well, gets along sell with the criminals in the SEIU well, gets along with George Soros (who has been thrown out of several countries in Europe) well, etc, etc.
      But other than shutting down our oil wells so that oil is too expensive, and refusing to allow Canada to pipe their oil down to us, and stopping the new development of oil in Alaska, I can’t think of another thing that he as done well.

      • NancyJ

        Excuse all the typos. I just get fired up with these idiot progressives.

        • JC711

          Nancy, I agree with everything you’ve written. The only things he does well are DETRIMENTAL-to-the-US-and-its-CITIZENS things. He’s really good…. IF you’re an ILLEGAL ALIEN ( especially a criminal illegal alien ), a welfare lifer, a fraudulent voter, a muslim terrorist, etc. Yes, then he’s your guy !

      • Disgruntled Citizen

        The amazing administrator of this site told me I was posting my comments too quickly. (This reply to NancyJ was the only one I have posted for days!) Anyway, Nancy, what I said is that you totally have it right in my opinion. We MUST get Obama out of office while America is still in existence!!!!!!!!

      • Frankly Frank

        Nancy, he has strengthened the Muslim Brotherhood very well.

        • Raven

          … and done a good job of alienated a lot of other nations .

      • Lee Baldwin

        the great usurper has also mandated gay history to be taught to elementary school children. He just might do something in a closet well for all we know.

        • Lee Baldwin

          and, by the way, Daves is a moron.

          • daves

            Awe, you say the nicest things.

            I bet you $100 that President Obama never mandated that gay history month be taught in school.

          • Frisby

            Dave isn’t going to leave the country, he’s going to change it to suit himself and his cronies! They have taken it over. You patroits had a chance to keep this great country and didn’t have the brains or the talent to keep it! You have let people like dave and his friends– foreigners, thugs, politicians and anything else that slithered across the border have it! Just like the Christens thought they had the market cornered with their religion. Prayer in schools. The ACLU, a hand full of people took the power away from the Christens with ease. Then people like dave and his cronies saw how easy it was to take it away from a bunch of morons! Now you people can’t and don’t know what to do about it. The Republicans has the majority and power to band together and control the politicians! Instead they decided to sleep, watch their sports, take their drugs and let someone else worry about the country! Well, people like dave saw their chance to seize it.
            I resent my country being turned into this!

            Oh, you can go get your little pop guns and act all big and bad they will stick them up your butts and turn you Patroits into pop sickles!

            Your women, children/ Grandchildren are in the governments camps and they will do what the government tells them to do! The government will be first, and the family will be second or third!

            The only people that the people like Dave, Mexicans, Arabs, Cubans, thugs and politicians have been able to use are the gutless wonder cowards that have been tooo scared and lazy to look after their own freedoms and interests! Now go take your drugs, turn on your sports go back to sleep! Your country belongs to people like dave now!

    • pstreet

      A liberal troll spouting the sual brainless nonsense from its nether regions, the smartest end.

      • pstreet

        The Usual nonsense
        My fingers often forget to hit the key.

    • Phil

      Chris, you’re probably right about the 25% Christrians and that’s what is wrong with the country. Turning back to god is the only thing that’s really going to save this country.

      • Frisby

        You’re right, God needs to be back in this country! Then you lazy ass Christens need to get a grip on it! If you can find your backbone long enough!

    • Apache6

      Social Issues are just as important as the Economy,jobs,and the Spending !!

    • Floyd

      obama talks of muslims and where he’s from a MUST see for ALL Americans
      http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

  • James Thomas

    More importantly, our country cannot win unless it addresses and corrects the social morass we find ourselves mired in today.

  • Scott C in Spring Tx

    The answer to this question can be found in researching the morals and ethics of the majority of citizens that vote. Social issues are a cultural thing. While we in America would not hunt down other humans and behead them as a norm in our society there are tribes in the Amazon that do; although we may be tempted at times it is not socially acceptable. It is up to our courts, justice system, schools, and churches to teach what is and is not socially acceptable. Our schools, especially our colleges are run mostly by Socialists type thinkers which is very liberal and does not take into account any accountability to God. As the world grows older the people on it draw further from their Creator. Sad but true, until times merit a turn to Hope, such as the event on September 11, 2001. All the churches were overflowing, but only for a few weeks. Then everyone went back to their sinful ways.

  • jim letourneau

    You keep calling Obama a waste hasen’t created any jobs GAO say we have slow growth and you say Rush, fox news unemployment is 36 % and you think the homeless, and unemployed with hungrey children are worried about Christmass trees and gay marriage, they do blame Bush, GAO list Bush worst jobs in US history, worst economy since 1930′s, your on top of things. Bush Channey, you forgot the rest of the world hasen’t

    • arpiem

      You can’t blame Bush for adding trillions to the debt and deficit, and Bush’s record is infintely better than obama’s. The deficit decreased under Bush every year until 2007, when the spend-crazy Democrats took over Congress, and you can look it up. When obama took over, gasoline was $1.84 per gallon.

      • Captain Shays

        You seem as confused as any Democrat or Republican out there. BUsh may have reduced “the deficit” but the national debt increased by $5.5 TRILLION.
        Remember Democrats saying that “Clinton left office with a $Trillion surplus and Bush squandered it”? What about the $1.8 Trillion to our national debt that increased during his 8 years? How convenient for a partisan dummy to ignore that ehy?
        This is why once people understand what Ron Paul is saying and they come into his camp they never leave like they do with the flavor of the week candidates. It doesn’t matter which of the others wins the White House whether Obama, Gingrich, Santorum or Romney. The national debt WILL continue to increase. We WILL get into more unnecessary/undeclared wars and we WILL continue to lose more and more of our freedoms.

        But in a country that has become so stupid that no longer cares which country their kids dies in or how much debt we leave to out children and grand children and where the word “FREE” has become just another four letter word we stand very little chance of electing someone like Ron Paul who is the ONLY ONE able to run all that around.

      • Frisby

        Yep, Bush certainly wasn’t a shining star! Neither was his Socialists father! If fact, It’s been Socialism since 1936! The moron people are having trouble understanding this!

      • Captain Shays

        arpien

        I didn’t blame Bush for the $5.5 trillion national debt increase during his 8 years any more than I blame Clinton for the $1.8 Trillion increase during his 8 years any more than I blame Obama for the increase of $5 Trillion in just three years. They are ALL doing the work of the Federal Reserve and no matter who we elect or re-elect unless we abolish the Fed we WILL get deeper and deepr in debt. We WILL have more unncessary wars and we WILL lose more freedoms. Ron Paul is the ONLY ONE who will lead us back to the Constitutional principles and fiscal policies that will stop it.

    • don

      liberial jim need to be reminded under bush the last 4 years was under democrat. control an a lot of people tryed to look into fredie mac an was told by the democrats WHO were in control of them that everything was ok. the fall of our econamlies is in the democrats lap. just like the last 3 years. obama= the largest debt maker in our histery.=the great food stamp president= one huge solialist= more people one food stamps every=has fussses math to figure our uemployment rate= the most costitional dashing president= all this an more =a one term president.

      • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

        Sorry it was two years and the Great Recession was on the way by the time the Dems took office. The reason they won big in 2006 was because Bush was an incompetent joke, who had no clue from day one. He capitalized on 911 tragedy, fought two wars stupidly, didn’t pay for either, and allowed the oversight of the housing bubble to wither. It wasn’t Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, but the failure and compliance of SEC, FINRA, Countrywide Financial, its clones, and the bribed ratings agencies.

        Get real, it was Bush who pandered to the religious right and gave away $8 billion per annum to his faith-based initiatives and who created the unpaid drug mandate part of Medicare for multi-billions. Wise up you ideologues and understand who is really for the middle class. The Middle Class won’t benefit from Romney or the crazy Santorum. Many of you folks are passed birth control, but your children aren’t. They aren’t going to allow some Bible-thumper to bring back the days of the religious Inquisition and the Scarlet Letter.

      • Frisby

        The demo and repub are all working together! Like a well oiled machine! Your just toooo stupid to know it!!!!

    • pstreet

      another liberal troll posting trash.

    • Diana

      Bush had a great economic record until for whatever reason the voters elected the Dems to control congress in 2006. After the Bush tax cuts there was economic growth for 4 years. Your figures are inaccurate. Do not Forget Obama, Biden and Hillary were all in the Senate voting against everything Bush. Let Obama blame himself for what he talks about inheriting. The media has so blamed Bush for everything that many Reps have bought into this and are afraid to defend him. Overall I think he was a great Pres…wish he was back. Obama has been effective in blaming Bush for his failed record even after over 3 years. His line now is that things were worse than he thought and he needs more time to correct them. We need to expose this lie. to save our country. Obama has made things many times over worse that when he came into office. The recession was started by Fannie and Freddie which Bush tried to stop but was blocked by the Dem congress.

      • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

        Bush pushed tax cuts during wartime, pushed the faith-based initiatives, supported the drug mandate (unpaid for) and his Executive Branch was bribed or looked the other way regarding the housing bubble and proper SEC over sight. Sorry Dodd and Frank didn’t write the 84% of the toxic mortgages between 2001 and 2007 by Countrywide Financial. Keep on dreaming. His incompetence led to the loss of Congress.

        Read the following and learn something for a change. It isn’t liberal spin, its the reality and the facts behind that reality.

        Examining the big lie: How the facts of the economic crisis stack up
        By Barry Ritholtz, Published: November 19, 2011

        It’s fair to say that our discussion about the big lie touched a nerve.
        The big lie of the financial crisis, of course, is that troubling technique used to try to change the narrative history and shift blame from the bad ideas and terrible policies that created it.

        Based on the scores of comments, people are clearly interested in understanding the causes of the economic disaster. I want to move beyond what I call “the squishy narrative” — an imprecise, sloppy way to think about the world — toward a more rigorous form of analysis. Unlike other disciplines, economics looks at actual consequences in terms of real dollars. So let’s follow the money and see what the data reveal about the causes of the collapse.

        Rather than attend a college-level seminar on the complex philosophy of causation, we’ll keep it simple. To assess how blameworthy any factor is regarding the cause of a subsequent event, consider whether that element was 1) proximate 2) statistically valid 3) necessary and sufficient.

        Consider the causes cited by those who’ve taken up the big lie. Take for example New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s statement that it was Congress that forced banks to make ill-advised loans to people who could not afford them and defaulted in large numbers. He and others claim that caused the crisis. Others have suggested these were to blame: the home mortgage interest deduction, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, the 1994 Housing and Urban Development memo, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and homeownership targets set by both the Clinton and Bush administrations. When an economy booms or busts, money gets misspent, assets rise in prices, fortunes are made. Out of all that comes a set of easy-to-discern facts.

        Here are key things we know based on data. Together, they present a series of tough hurdles for the big lie proponents.

        •The boom and bust was global. Proponents of the Big Lie ignore the worldwide nature of the housing boom and bust.
        A McKinsey Global Institute report noted “from 2000 through 2007, a remarkable run-up in global home prices occurred.” It is highly unlikely that a simultaneous boom and bust everywhere else in the world was caused by one set of factors (ultra-low rates, securitized AAA-rated subprime, derivatives) but had a different set of causes in the United States. Indeed, this might be the biggest obstacle to pushing the false narrative. How did U.S. regulations against redlining in inner cities also cause a boom in Spain, Ireland and Australia? How can we explain the boom occurring in countries that do not have a tax deduction for mortgage interest or government-sponsored enterprises? And why, after nearly a century of mortgage interest deduction in the United States, did it suddenly cause a crisis?

        These questions show why proximity and statistical validity are so important. Let’s get more specific.The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 is a favorite boogeyman for some, despite the numbers that so easily disprove it as a cause.It is a statistical invalid argument, as the data show.

        For example, if the CRA was to blame, the housing boom would have been in CRA regions; it would have made places such as Harlem and South Philly and Compton and inner Washington the primary locales of the run up and collapse. Further, the default rates in these areas should have been worse than other regions.

        What occurred was the exact opposite: The suburbs boomed and busted and went into foreclosure in much greater numbers than inner cities. The tiny suburbs and exurbs of South Florida and California and Las Vegas and Arizona were the big boomtowns, not the low-income regions. The redlined areas the CRA address missed much of the boom; places that busted had nothing to do with the CRA.

        The market share of financial institutions that were subject to the CRA has steadily declined since the legislation was passed in 1977. As noted by Abromowitz & Min, CRA-regulated institutions, primarily banks and thrifts, accounted for only 28 percent of all mortgages originated in 2006.

        “•Nonbank mortgage underwriting exploded from 2001 to 2007, along with the private label securitization market, which eclipsed Fannie and Freddie during the boom. Check the mortgage origination data: The vast majority of subprime mortgages — the loans at the heart of the global crisis — were underwritten by unregulated private firms. These were lenders who sold the bulk of their mortgages to Wall Street, not to Fannie or Freddie. Indeed, these firms had no deposits, so they were not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp or the Office of Thrift Supervision. The relative market share of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dropped from a high of 57 percent of all new mortgage originations in 2003, down to 37 percent as the bubble was developing in 2005-06.

        •Private lenders not subject to congressional regulations collapsed lending standards. Taking up that extra share were nonbanks selling mortgages elsewhere, not to the GSEs. Conforming mortgages had rules that were less profitable than the newfangled loans. Private securitizers — competitors of Fannie and Freddie — grew from 10 percent of the market in 2002 to nearly 40 percent in 2006. As a percentage of all mortgage-backed securities, private securitization grew from 23 percent in 2003 to 56 percent in 2006.”

        These firms had business models that could be called “Lend-in-order-to-sell-to-Wall-Street-securitizers.” They offered all manner of nontraditional mortgages — the 2/28 adjustable rate mortgages, piggy-back loans, negative amortization loans. These defaulted in huge numbers, far more than the regulated mortgage writers did.
        Consider a study by McClatchy: It found that more than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending. These private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year. And McClatchy found that out of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006, only one was subject to the usual mortgage laws and regulations.

        A 2008 analysis found that the nonbank underwriters made more than 12 million subprime mortgages with a value of nearly $2 trillion. The lenders who made these were exempt from federal regulations.
        A study by the Federal Reserve shows that more than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions. The study found that the government-sponsored enterprises were concerned with the loss of market share to these private lenders — Fannie and Freddie were chasing profits, not trying to meet low-income lending goals.

        Beyond the overwhelming data that private lenders made the bulk of the subprime loans to low-income borrowers, we still have the proximate cause issue. If we cannot blame housing policies from the 1930s or mortgage tax deductibility from even before that, then what else can we blame? Mass consumerism? Incessant advertising? The post-World War II suburban automobile culture? MTV’s “Cribs”? Just how attenuated must a factor be before fair-minded people are willing to eliminate it as a prime cause?

        I recognize all of the above as merely background noise, the wallpaper of our culture. To blame the housing collapse that began in 2006, a recession dated to December 2007 and a market collapse in 2008-09 on policies of the early 20th century is to blame everything — and nothing.

        Ritholtz is chief executive of FusionIQ, a quantitative research firm. He is the author of “Bailout Nation” and runs a finance blog, the Big Picture.
        Procurator

    • Bud

      What Party was in charge of Congress in 2007 till now, please tell me. Thanks

      • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

        The political process is controlled by the ability to get 60 votes for a super majority in the US Senate. The GOP controlled Congress from 2001 through 2007. From 2007 through 2010 Democrats controlled both Houses. They lost the House in 2010 and do not have 60 votes in the Senate, case closed. There is a stalemate. By the way from 2009 though the first session of Congress under the Democrats and President Obama, there were more cloture votes ( filibusters) in those two years then all the cloture votes (aside from Integration votes) in the period from 1950 through 1980. So the GOP did their job, the obfuscated, delayed and obstructed.

        From 2009 through

    • mamagrizzly”sfriend

      jim letourneau…….i had a good job during the bush administration…….and there was always signs every where…..” HELP WANTED”"” could not find people to fill the positions at times……..i made more interest on my savings during that time….did very well…..and sold property at great profit .. and now …….my house has lost 1/4 value …..no interest on any investment ….food outrageous in price….gas hitting the almost $4.oo gal……taxes went up on my home …..medicare is not covering the things it use to…….i could run a long list of items……Bush did have A good job rate during his administration …..I .KNOW…I HIRED A LOT OF PEOPLE……..I THINK THAT YOU LIBTURDS MIGHT WANT TO PUT THE BLAME RIGHT WHERE IT BELONGS…….on the administration that is now RUINING THIS COUNTRY…along with many coharts of both parties…and the IMPOSTER that has nothing else in mind but to destroy this nation……you must be a gov. dole person…….well friend it will get one hell of a lot worse for you when the rest of us is taken down and there will be no gov. money to pay you DOLE RECEIVERS…..the deceiver only keeps your nose in his camels tent……so you can be used as a USEFUL IDIOT…..he does not have to put a sign out for that …job……”"”TO MANY OF YOU SAY …HERE I AM “”"”lord obama…..

  • donl

    I like rick but I like newt a lot more. A.B.O. ( Anyone But Obama).

    • Disgruntled Citizen

      A lot of “ho’s” in America like Newt also and are waiting in line to be his next “woman”. Agree, though, that ANYONE BUT OBAMA!!

    • bobr

      I believe in GOD – that is GET OBAMA DEFEATED…..our nation will not be able to withstand another four years with this Bozo!

  • http://www.politisite.com Karl Gotthardt

    As far as I am concerned, Obama and the DNC created the issue to steer the discussion to social issues, diverting the discussion from Obama dismal record on the economy. The President can’t possibly win on his record and he has one now unlike in 2008. The main stream media is complicit in helping the Obama campaign to keep the social issues alive.

    As far as I am concerned the sooner GOP candidates tell main stream media interviewers that this is not an election about social issues but a referendum on Obama’s record the better off they will be. Don’t let Obama and his main stream media allies chose the direction of the campaign. James Carville’s adage “It’s the economy stupid” still applies.

    Let’s face it, lack of action on the economy, a dismal foreign policy blunder, especially in the Middle East and the so-called reset button with Russia has also gone South. 16 vacations, golfing, lavish parties and constant campaigning are the hallmark of this President. Don’t let him escape the scrutiny by getting entrapped in social issues.

  • Bonnie

    This whole country is going to Hell!!!!! All the important values that this country stood for are being taken away by communists, muslums and atheists. The country instead will be replaced with violence and hatred. God help us all!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Denise

      Hi Bonnie,
      This country is has abandoned G’d. How dare we expect His continued blessings. We have become like Sodom and Satan is at the helm in the Oval Office. Our government, on both sides of the isle, is replete with muslims, queers, and commies.

  • jake barrett

    Would you define “unemployment” as measuring “people who want a job, but can’t get one?” This is, broadly speaking, the definition embraced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The trick to making those numbers dance lies in measuring “people who want a job.” The widely reported U-3 unemployment metric, currently standing at 8.3 percent, is very aggressive in shaving off people who have not made recent efforts to find work. It is further distorted by massive “seasonal adjustments,” which made over a million people vanish into thin air last month.

    BOTTOM LINE: IT’S THE ECONOMY STUPID. AND NOW GAS PRICES.

    MUNIPULATING UNEMPLOYMENT STATS FOOLS NO ONE. WHERE ARE THE JOBS?

  • Gene

    Ignore Jim

  • Wayne Peterkin

    This article may have had a point, but it rambled around changing direction so many times I could not make much sense out of it. I’m sorry, but this was one of the most poorly organized and written pieces I have seen in a long while.

  • Carlos J. Negron

    Money talks and everything else walks!

    In our materialistic society, no words ring truer

    Allowing the message to be steered away from the economy is STUPICIDE!

  • http://conservativebyte.com Frank J. Randazzo

    The liar in chief is on his own soros aided mission and its the dismanteling of the US. saul alinsky would be proud of him.The candidates should go right after these commie journalist (MSM)who protect him with their silence.Newt started it and Santorum followed. good for them go after obamas tools.

  • Dave

    Ron Paul Believes Social Issues are Winning Issues if They Are Constitutional Issues

    The current headline on Drudge reads: “Ron Paul: Social conservatism ‘a losing position.”

    This is what Paul said, but is misleading once you understand the context. From the CNS News story Drudge links to:

    This is what Paul said, but is misleading once you understand the context. From the CNS News story Drudge links to:

    “Do you–are you uncomfortable–certainly Rick Santorum is the one who has been in the forefront of some of this talk on social issues, but there have been others in the race,” Crowley asked Paul. “Are you uncomfortable with this talk about social issues? Do you consider it a winning area for Republicans in November?”

    “No,” said Paul. “I think it’s a losing position……. NOW read the REST of What Paul Said….

    “I mean, I talk about it because I have a precise understanding of how difficult problems are to be solved,” Paul continued. “And they’re not to be at the national level. We’re not supposed to nationalize these problems. The founders were very clear that problems like this, if there needs to be legislation of sorts, the state has the right to write the legislation that they so choose. And that solves a lot of our problems.”

    What Paul is talking about here is federalism–the notion that the powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states. Abortion, gay marriage, religious expression–to the degree that the Founders ever thought that these would become controversial issues, they most certainly believed they should be handled by the states. States have their own murder and assault laws, for example. Before Roe vs. Wade, different states had different laws regarding abortion. Overturning Roe vs. Wade means getting the federal government out of what the Founders intended to be a state issue. The same is true of marriage, in which the states have diverse rules on what age you can marry, common law marriage and a host of other issues regarding marriage. On religious expression, the Constitution explicitly says that Congress “shall pass no law” abridging citizens right to free expression of religion. These were also to be matters handled at the state level.

    As a constitutional conservative, this is also what Ron Paul believes. As a social conservative, this is also what Paul believes can best advance social conservatism in a real and meaningful way.

    What social conservatives like Rick Santorum who want new federal legislation for everything are really saying is this–that one day they will convince states like Vermont and Massachusetts to become pro-life, to oppose to gay marriage and to support public prayer. What a social conservative (and constitutional conservative) like Ron Paul is saying is this–that we will never convince liberal states like Vermont and Massachusetts to agree with us on social issues, but this should not prevent social conservatives from saving the lives of unborn children, or defining marriage as being between a man and a woman, in states where a culturally conservative consensus already exists. Vermont should not dictate social policy to Alabama and vice versa. Ron Paul believes the best way to advance social conservatism is to get the federal government out of the way, as the Founding Fathers originally intended.

    Ironically, it is federal intervention into state business on cultural issues that first gave rise to a conscious social conservatism in the United States. First, when the federal courts decided that school prayer was unconstitutional and later when the federal courts declared Roe Vs. Wade the law of the land, overturning each state’s individual laws regarding abortion in one fell swoop.

    There is little doubt that both Paul and Santorum are earnest in their socially conservative views. The only difference is Paul’s constitutional approach could finally give social conservatives real victories for the first time in memory.

    • Sam

      Santorum voted for many social programs and millions for Planned Parenthood and the Dept of Education while in the Senate. How does that make him a ‘social conservative’?

      Congressional Record, q.v.

    • Hardtack

      Right on. It’s the big-government approach (Santorum) vs. the small-governement approach (Paul).

      Paul has my vote.

  • http://conservativebyte Lindy

    ONE MINUTE EACH NIGHT

    This is the scariest election we as Christians have ever faced, and from the looks of the polls,
    the Christians aren’t voting Christian values.
    We all need to be on our knees.
    Do you believe we can take God at His word?
    Call upon His name, then stand back and watch His wonders unfold.
    This scripture gives us, as Christians, ownership of this land and the ability to
    call upon God to heal it. I challenge you to do that.
    We have never been more desperate than now for God to heal our land.
    This election is the scariest I remember in my lifetime.

    2 Chronicles 7:14. ‘If my people, which are called by my name shall humble themselves,
    and pray, and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways,
    then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.’

    During WWII, there was an advisor to Churchill, who organized a group of people who dropped
    what they were doing every night at a prescribed hour for one minute,
    to collectively pray for the safety of England, its people and peace.
    This had an amazing effect, as bombing stopped.
    There is now a group of people organizing the same thing here in America.

    The United States of America, and our citizens, need prayer more than ever!!!
    If you would like to participate, each evening at 9:00 P.M. Eastern Time (8 PM Central, 7 PM Mountain, 6 PM Pacific),
    stop whatever you’re doing, and spend one minute praying for the safety of the United States,
    our troops, our citizens, for peace in the world, the upcoming election,
    that the Bible will remain the basis for the laws governing our land, and that Christianity will grow in the U.S.

    If you know anyone who would like to participate, please pass this along.
    Someone said if people really understood the full extent of the power we have available through prayer,
    we might be speechless. Our prayers are the most powerful asset we have.
    Thank you.
    Please pass this on to anyone who you think will want to join us.
    God Bless You!!!

  • http://www.patriotactionnetwork.com Shane

    I disagree! Social issues are not as important as economic issues, especially the national debt and unemployment. For someone who is as far to the right as Santorum is, social issues would kill him in a battle with Obama. Gingrich or Romney would have a better chance against Obama than the far right Santorum.

    Unlike Santorum, most Americans believe that birth control is a good thing.

  • Jim

    The Social conservative agenda is not the political topic today. Economics and the reach and size of government is. Obama is vulnerable on these issues. What is the point of shifting the debate to abortion and school prayer? Why coax people away from the bread and butter issues? In the end, the Pres. is not empowered to act on either of these two issues, except as it applies to the appointment of Federal judges.

    When the primary comes to my state my vote will be for Romney. He is the candidate most able to bring executive experience and effective leadership to the office which will dismember Obamaism. No one can challenge his personal moral conduct and I have confidence that his judicial appointments will be aimed supporting our Constitution.

    • Diana

      You are so right. Obama has to love this. It takes away from his failed Socialistic record. The media also will make Reps look like quacks. Truth is Santorum does not have a social conservative voting record. Actually his overal voting record is the most moderate of any of the candidates. He has not been vetted. Newt is trying to revive himself again. He has a very vindicative temperament which could destroy him and take down our party if he were the noinee. He causes much damage to the party by lying about Romney’s record. He talks about running a positive campaign while running the most negative one.

    • M. Carlson

      Never seen a religious zealot like Santorum step up and pay for all the unlimited population he wants!

  • The Gizmo51

    I copied this from “CROOKS AND LIARS.”
    GOP Rep: Married Couples Should Practice Abstinence
    Posted: 20 Feb 2012 06:00 PM PST
    Rep Blankenbeker To Married Couples: “Practice Abstinence”
    Click here to view this media
    State Rep.Lynne Blankenbeker (R-NH) suggested yesterday that married couples who can’t afford birth control can use condoms or abstinence, because they’re available “over the counter” and they are affordable.

    “People with or without insurance have two affordable choices, one being abstinence and the other being condoms, both of which you can get over the counter,” she said.
    The comments came at the same hearing where state Rep. Jeanine Notter (R-Merrimack) claimed that birth control pills lead to prostate cancer. In an interview with Merrimack Patch, Notter said that she was referring to studies discussing potentially high levels of estrogen in the environment through birth control pills and a connection to prostate cancer.
    Blankenbeker was engaged in a dialogue with Sylvia Kennedy, a New Hampshire doctor, who was testifying in support of Obama’s plan. Kennedy urged the coverage of birth control and responded to Blankenbeker that condoms are not a foolproof means of contraception, and also suggested that abstinence does not work all the time, a notion Blankenbeker disagreed with.
    “Abstinence works 100 percent of the time,” she said.
    Blankenbeker also asserted that condoms and abstinence offer married couples a wider range of family planning options than oral contraceptives.
    “If you decide you want to get pregnant you can refrain from abstinence,” she said.

    Apparently Republicans need a daily reminder that the year is 2012 A.D., also that “It’s the economy, stupid!”

    • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

      Well since it is the economy:

      The Gross Domestic National Product was:
      2008 – $14,506,142,000 (trillions) Bush Recession
      2009 – 14,223,686.000
      2010 – 14,600,828,000
      2012 15,294,300,000 (first quarter)

      Dow Jones Industrial Average bottomed under George W. Bush 6600!
      Currently today, approaching 13,000

      Work Force: Participation WF Unemployed Unemployment

      January 2011 152,536,000 63.9% 14.939 million 9.8%
      January 2012 154,395,000 63.7% 12,857 million 8.3%

      Can you read and understand the direction we are going? Just look at housing starts, and many other relevant numbers.

      • Are You Serious

        Yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Come back when you have the correct figures.

      • David

        What does the word UNSUSTAINABLE mean. The Dow crashed in 1929 and it will happen again because we are on shaky ground. We will not be able to withstand these kinds of deficits. The U.S. is upside down on it’s mortgage. Listen to Paul Ryan! I think he know more about this than most people.

  • http://www.filedby.com/author/michael_ledo/2426094/ mikeledo

    Catholics believe in evolution. They believe the garden and flood stories are parables and are not factual accounts. They do not believe in prophecy. Revelation is just a book for inspiration. They also believe that communion host and wine phsically turns into the body and blood of Jesus at communion. This is not a symbolic miracle but an actual miracle that some could describe as cannibalism. They believe masturbation is sinful as is certain contraception…but not all as they teach techniques to avoid pregnancy.

    The way to avoid the church and insurance companies having to pay for oral contraception pills or morning after pills (Numbers 5) is to make it all over the counter with no age restrictions…that would be the true Libertarian thing to do.

  • Becky

    Yea Lindy….I join you in prayer for this country. May God indeed help us!!!

    • Are You Serious

      God is not going to help us!!! What would he, this country has turned its back om him.

  • bob corbe

    Jim i think we’re all tired of hearing Bush did it. Obama , real unemployment 36%, fuel up 94%. food up 391/2 % and Jim i don’t know who’s at the controls either George Soros or Obama, but for sure it isn’t Geoge Bush. Jim i hopeyou never have to tell your children that you were the cause and not the solution. I was a democrat for years but will never be again
    for i believe in freedom not communism.

  • PISSED OFF PATRIOT

    the GOP should dump all of these guys if Romney loses Michigan and Arizona and draft someone that can beat Obama, and Gingrich should be banned from running PERIOD hes a spoiler and I like Santorum but hes starting to wave the bible in everyones face . this infighting is rediculous, Obama had a 38% popularity in most polls three months ago now with this crap hes ahead of anyone by about 5%. GET REAL Obama has to go. If and its a big If, If the GOP would keep its nose out of everyones bedroom we’d win every election.

    • JRRS

      Gingrich is behavining like a democrat hired gun. He seems to relish savaging Romney. Santorum is a big government socialist who was dumped by the voters in Pa for ethical violations and a liberal voting record. He supported his liberal pal Arlen Specter, but the voters got tired of his liberal agenda too.

    • mamagrizzly”sfriend

      PISSED OFF…..i guess you are not interested in knowing that you are a useful idiot for the media and establishment that keeps saying that if ROMNEY DOES NOT GET THE NOMINATION……we need to draft some one else!!!!!! these other people have worked hard and they have the right to finish this campaign out just as is……WHO SAID that ROMNEY IS THE ONLY ONE TO BEAT OBAMA……..all you people do is give obama the advantage…… WELL many of us out here does not like romney and will never vote for him…….grow some b—–s and get off this hack that the old republicans want you to beleive…. i love you media PARROTS!!!!!!! WHAT IS THAT THING SETTING ON YOUR SHOULDERS????? PUT IT TO WORK….

  • Sam

    Santorum is welcome to worship God in any manner he chooses, just don’t fost your religious beliefs off on the rest of us. He is already trying to get the country to believe he is a conservative, but his record in the Congress says otherwise. Voting for big government social programs, raising the debt ceiling, increasing taxes, millions for Planned Parenthood, voting for radical labor’s agenda, and favoring gun control are not conservative values.

  • Carmelo Junior

    LINCOLN WAS A SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE. REAGAN WAS A SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE. BUSH WAS A SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE!

  • Greg

    Conservatives can win taking the high moral ground, but stay out of private bedrooms.

  • 9thID

    Liberals and Liberal-tarians are both moral relativist Libertines so they don’t see a connection between the moral issues that are the root cause of our economic problems…

  • http://mozilla Robert E. Lee

    social,moral, spiritual decay are the reason we have the idiot we have now leading us down the dead end road of communism;; all morals and spiritual beliefs are persona non grata in a communist country.

  • Anne

    Conservatives need to make their message clear and get it out there over the msm hype. Santorum doesn’t want to make contraceptives illegal, but that is the message that MSNBC is putting out. The asprin between the knees comment isn’t some horrible statement. Everyone over 50 has heard that many times. It was a common comment before the birthcontrol pill was available in the 60′s. Santorum lives his faith but doesn’t govern by his faith. He has even voted to fund planned parenthood. There are many social issues that most of the country believes. We are not a majority of far left radicals. We don’t believe we should be the earth before man. We do believe we should be good caretakers of the earth. Radical environmentalists are not the majority, in fact they are usually wealthy and can afford high gas prices and home heating prices. Get the real message out clearly and it will be accepted.

  • http://www.bhrglobal.com Bruce Rubin

    What this country needs is LEADERSHIP and we have received none of it for the past twelve years.
    It is getting to be the time and potentially the point of no return for the US.
    We need leadership that will stand up to the special interests and provide us a path to energy independence.
    We need leadership who will stand up for the USA on the world stage and not back down.
    We need leadership who will provide a path to a balanced budget that includes all aspects and ideas starting with Bowles-Simpson and its ideas and concepts.
    Unfortunately we don’t have anyone who seems capable of doing this and especially the present leader.

  • willyt

    The social issue most important to half the people is getting a free ride from the other half. Conservatives don’t support that therefore they have no chance of winning in NObama’s ruined state of the nation. Maybe some of these tax takers will “take the cure” when the printing presses run out of chinese ink…

  • Dolores F. Tamoria

    Conservatives cannot win the election on Social Issues. The Candidates need to focus on NATIONAL Issues which a future President will face. How they plan to do this is what we want to know. The Contraceptive Issue is well on its way to the Supreme Court and we already know where the Candidates stand on this issue. There is a time and place for everything. Now is not the time for Social Issues when the future existence of our Nation is at stake.

  • TJB

    If Santorum wins the GOP nomination then Obama will win in a landslide! Most common sense Americans are tired of theocrats like Santorum treating LGBT (“gay”) people like second class citizens. The GOP sohodl stick fto fiscalk conservatism (and MEAN it, not just lip serivce), and self-reliance. Trying to outlaw contraception is opposed by probably 90% of Americans, and even 70-80% of Catholics. It’s the economy and the national debt, STUPID!!!
    I say all this as a life-long Republican. I am 44, and got my parents to change from Demoncrats to Republican in 1980. As much as I despise Obama’s idiotic economic policies (he has absolutely no clue how to run a business or what drives an economy), I will NEVER vote for Santorum. I would shoot myself in the head first!!! If we want to win the election in November and stop the Marxist dictator-in chief (DIC), then you all better make sure Santorum does not get the nomination. If he does we are all screwed!!! I am not crazy about Romney or Gingrich, but could probably hold my nose and vote for them (esp. Romney). I will be voting for Ron Paul in the MD primary. He is a true, honest fiscal conservative, and social libertarian. As for his somewhat unorthodox foreign policy views, I am confident that Congress, his Cabinet, and the Pentagon brass won’t let him do anything supid! Can’t be worse than the DIC we have now, kissing the tookas of every Muslim dictator the planet.

  • Captain Shays

    Santorum may like to label himself a “social conservative” or a “traditional conservative” but what is is NOT is a Constitutional or a fiscal conservative. If anything he is a new style conservative with the adition of social issues. Otherwise known as a progressive or a neoconservative. He is NOT like the old style conservatives who opposed Wilson’s glob trotting, police the world, meddling interventionist foreign policy philosophy. Of course those old style conservatives were labeled “isolationists” for that opposition. He is NOT a fiscal conservative or Constitutional conservative like the old style’s who opposed the Federal Reserve system, the IRS,the New Deal or FDR’s other “entitlements”.
    Just look at the man’s voting record. He’s all over the place and I think once REAL conservatives start to catch wind of it they will realize that on a host of issues he’s closer to Obama than he is to someone like Ron Paul who IS an old style conservative and he IS the antithesis of a progressive. Newt? He proudly admits that he’s a progressive. Romney? He just doesn’t talk about it because he’s too busy throwing generalities and platitudes at us. “Yes America can be a great country again” “We can become prosperous once more” “We must defeat Obama”. “We must remain strong” Yeah yeah yeah. OK.
    Santorum is one who calls himself “pro life” and touts his “pro war” positions as if there is no contradiction. He NEVER talks about the Christian Just War Principles while he’s touting his “Christianity”. Ever notice? He talks about the founding fathers but always leaves out their respect for the Christian Just War Principles and the FACT that the progressives especially Democrats are the original war party. The original police the world party. The one world govt party (league of Nations and United Nations) and they are the first to send us into wars without a declaration of war against countries that never attacked us or threatened us.
    Maybe people will wake up before it’s too late but in a country where we no longer THINK about where our sons does or for what, and where we don’t care how much debt we leave to our children and grand children and where the word “FREE” has become just another four letter word, we stand very little chance of electing someone like Ron Paul. If we don’t we WILL lose more freedom. We WILL get into more unnecessary/undeclared wars and we WILL grow deeper and deeper in debt. Oh well.

  • M. Carlson

    I am a 65 yr old conservative and I do not care about birth control, Planned Parenthood or running your personal life. What is important is the economy, national defense, Iran and the border. What you do in your doctors office, hospital room, bedroom or your church is your business. Ayatollah Santorum with his restrictive church run agenda will sink the republican like 1964 if elected. I cannot see how anyone would want him lesislating personal choices. I will never vote for a religious zealot like Santorum who would be very bad for the country because he will impose his religious agenda on everyone. What religious freedom?

    • TJB

      Amen!

  • tweety

    I’m sure the under 30 crowd will hoot and holler about conservative stances on these issues, but there are two things to consider: 1) Older Americans have a better percentage in voting than younger and 2) They relish the chance to be examples of leadership rather than the younger followers-of-what’s-cool.

  • G Schmidt

    NO
    It is the economy stupid!!!! People ability to work and progress and everybody plays by the same rules are the most important thing
    I do not believe in abortion, but I am no one to do anything to stop unwanted fetus from being aborted.
    I have one wife and that is more than enough, but I do not have any problems if consenting adults want to live in polygamous relationship. AND SO ON

    Evangelicals telling me I have to live by their interpretation of a most often modified and translated bible is almost as bad as living under Islam rule.

  • Believer

    This ELECTION in November will the LAST opportunity we will ever have to RESCUE America,
    There is a time and place for everything, and this is NOT the time to try to change this SPIRITUALLY lost nation. First we must nominate a candidate who is not TOO EXTREME to go up against Obama. You must be able to reach ALL the VOTERS, not just the SOCIAL conservatives, after you remove Obama, which has to be the #1 PRIORITY, then after we, the Social conservatives tip the scale,then we will have our opportunity to bring this country back. I say we give Romney our Support, because he can reach more of the VOTING BLOC, then Santorum. Romney will not go against the Senate & the Congress, because we will be in the MAJORITY, and he would not RISK losing the election in 2016. The Social Conservatives are MAKING a VERY BIG MISTAKE pushing Santorum. We have to do things in the proper in
    order to succeed. We must think LONG term, not SHORT term. I am a Social,Fiscal conservative, who sees the BROADER PICTURE! If people vote Santorum, they will have given Obama their VOTE! Common Sense must be used in these PRIMARIES!

  • Helen Satmary

    After reading a lot of these articles I pray God to help those of us who honor HIm, who pray to Him from our hearts!!!! Who truly worship HIm.I do not know how He can stand to watch and hear some of the most raunchy thinking that goes on. I just wonder how smart-a– you are going to be when you stand before Him at your judgement! No wonder America is turning into a third world country with the likes of you we will be living in caves soon enough. You say nasty things about God, you tempt Him daily. And if you are going to talk about religions please know what you are talking about because you sound just soooooo ignorant (as you are).
    So my advices is to first come into the century you were born (this is not 1 ad)find out how true human being acts (life is not a orgasm a minute) Get a job and contribute to society instead of crying you cannot have sex every damn second. You are just disgusting.

  • GinnieMc

    I have read all of the above comments. Obama is a sleeze bag, all he wants to do is golf and go on vacatrions while our country is in a mess. Our poor men, women and CHILDREN that are homeless. Bush as far as I was concerned was a great President, Congress bneing Democxratric was the blame for some of the debt and also 9/11 Bush didnm’t ask for that to happen but he acted like a President and did what had to be done nat the time of this disaster. Obama stop the pipe line from Canada while he could have created many jobs for our Amereicans. I know many of you don’t like Newt Gingridge but he is the only one right now that can beat Obama in a debate and he has already balanced the budget, got this country back on it’s feet. So what if he has had more than one wife so has many many of Americans. I persona;lly thing the news media and the so called pac ads should spend their money on gertting this country back on it’s feet and out of debt rather than spend millions of dollars on trying to distroy one another. Tellk the American people what they want to hear what are they going to do for our country what arwe their plans in bearing Obama an d what do they have in mine for our country. First thing they should do is bring God back into our schools and have the Pledge Alegence to our Flag like they use to do. Our society now has gone to the dogs. No respect for God. I have never seen so much rape, killings, robberies and disrespect for our human race. Maybe if God was brought bacxk into our schools so our children will kniw and learn the respect for each other there would be less violence in our society. With God in our lives anything is possible, bring back our country the way it should be. Strop trying to be like Europe and other countries be what the USA stands for. “In God we Trust” Taking Christ our of Christmas is another thing I hate. Christrmas is the birth of Christ and don’t forget this. Newt and Santorum believe in God
    and with that intheir favor they can ask God for guideness in their discessions and choices and I am sure they will be good ones. We need to get the democratics out of the White House period then maybe we will get our country back to be what it was when Reagon was President. Give Newt a chance he did it once and I am sure he can do it again so what if he had more than one wife. He has learned his lesson on that score and has chosen his faith now to guide him. Be real people Ron Paul is a loser what he stands for is unbelievable. I wouldn’t vote for him is he was the last man standing. Rommney is just a guy with a lot of money and if you think he couldbeat Obama in a debate you are truly wrong. If he is nominated you mize as well kiss this country good-bye. Newt needs more supporters with money as he can’t beat Rommney if he doesn’t have money for campaigning. I am all for bringing this country back to the first ammendment.
    Wake up America do you want our country run by social values or conservative values? I pick the later myself. Remember the most important thing is to beat Obama. Look atr the millions and millions he has acquired for his campaign why doesn’t he give it to the homeless and bring our country back to where it should be. Excuse my spelling as I am truly upset with some of the comments We need God, God, God, God in our lives and in the White House. Amen!

  • Attila

    NO! While you “conservatives” pound this drum, the liberal/progressive/fascists will continue to waltz off with the voters, at least until national bankruptcy closes down the party. You would do better to adopt a live and let live attitude while you demand a return to constitutional government. Quit arguing about abortion, contraceptives, drugs, stem cell research; these are state and local issues; make the case there. These are quite outside the constitutional authority of the federal government, and by making them otherwise you open the door for the left’s panderfests leading to national insolvency.

  • The Truth

    This nation has seen what happens when they elect a Godless, immoral man into the highest office; one who rebukes social conservatism. Look how that has turned out, Christian organizations being forced against their belief and will to provide contraceptives, publically funded abortions (infanticide), the threat of forcing pastors, deacons, priests and other religious heads to enact gay marriage ceremonies. Where does it end. Social conservatism is at the heart of our country. Without it we are lost and become an immoral nation that will do anything, including going against our own Constitution to justify our sins (i.e. obama). I prefer a socially conservative President, otherwise how do we know the true character of the man/woman.

  • Leslie85223

    Rick Santorum is not a “conservative” in my opinion and he’s most certainly not presidential material! If Mitt has a poor showing in MI then I’ll probably join the Ron Paul supporters. At least I KNOW he’s got the domestic agenda right!!! I’d rather have a half way chance at restoring America than no chance at all should Obama win in 2012 . . .

  • DRE

    NONONO… Remember Moses Laws for Harden Hearts…The H H Media has indoctrinated half (or better) the populace believing The Sahra’s The Bachmann’s The Rick’s The Perry’s are all evil monsters.
    Please-Its great that women have rights to use Condoms or Birth Control. After all God granted everyone his grace and free will as “individuals”. Stop casting or acting out casting of stones. Please, raise your hand if you are perfect and without sin? Poor teaching-short vision education in the Church has in-part created this sticky-wicket. Or tool to grab majority of female Dem Votes/Spanish-Black African Vote etc.,

  • Cameron

    Santorum is neither a fiscal or social conservative. Just look at his voting record instead of what he is telling you. I fear him being president as much as Obama. Maybe he is scared he will come out of the closet if gay marriage is legalized. The more we let govt get involved in everything, the more the morality of society will break down. Am I the only one who notices the bigger govt gets, the less moral people become. Trust in God, not the govt!!!!

    • TJB

      No (self-respecting) gay would be caught dead in thsoe sweater vests that Santorum wears!

      • Are You Serious

        There is such a thing? Anything is possible.

  • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

    Social issues should not be outside of the boundaries set by the United States constitution.

    We need to get back to a constitutional government where our civil liberties come first.

    We need to get back to a balanced budget.

  • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

    During his time in the Senate, Santorum voted to:
    *** Give millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood;
    *** Raise the debt ceiling five times;
    *** DOUBLE the size of the Department of Education through the budget-busting and unconstitutional “No Child Left Behind” bill;
    *** Start a brand new, unfunded entitlement, Medicare Part D, the largest expansion of entitlement spending since President Lyndon Johnson – creating $16 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities;
    *** Stand with senators like Barbara Boxer and Frank Lautenberg to pass massive new federal gun control schemes and regulations;
    *** Keep workers under Big Labor’s thumb by voting against a National Right to Work law;
    *** Send $25 million in taxpayer dollars to North Korea;
    *** Pass Sarbanes-Oxley, which imposed dramatic new job-killing accounting regulations on businesses.
    And these are only just SOME of the Big Government positions Santorum took in the Senate.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdTfvLFlz-c

  • Duane Grindstaff

    If Right-Wing Christians like Theocracy so much, then why don’t they just go live in Iran. Laws against Same-Sex Marriage or that a woman has no choice about ridding her body of a parasite implanted in her by some man. It’s all the same, whether it be Christian or Muslim. Besides, if anybody ever bothers to read the Koran, they’d see that Muslims are Christian first. Let’s let Santorum go to Iran. That is where his kind belong.

    • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

      Excellent response. Theocrats do not belong in government, but in their places of worship. The Founding Fathers were far and away Deists and hardly even Christians. They were products of the Enlightenment and they all understood the tyranny of the state run and controlled church. They also rejected the the Pilgrim and Puritan fanatics. Our religious liberty is owed more to Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson, and not the hanging judges of Salem and the notorious Witch Trials. Santorum seems to want to return to Torquemada and the Great Inquisition.

  • charlie

    I was for Goldwater before I knew him, os I AM A CONSERTIVE. I’m an econimic consertive NOT a social consertive. I’ll probably vote for a social consertive because I’ll NEVER vote for a Dem until they become econimic consertives.

  • Ed

    How ridiculous. Any moron knows no one will win or lose on social issues alone. Or any other single area of concern. The winner will address solutions to a broad range of issues . It is clear the people reading these articles are more intelligent than the people writing them. I hope.

  • http://charter.net HTCM USN James Graham

    What really hurts, is how truthful his reasoning is.

    WHY OBAMA WILL BE RE-ELECTED IN 2012
    Dr. Williams’ prediction: Maybe you have read some newspaper articles written by Dr. Williams a conservative economist who happens to be Black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently teaching at George Mason University .

    No Matter What
    By Dr. Walter Williams
    Can President Obama be defeated in 2012? No. He can’t… I am going on record as saying that President Barak Obama will win a second term. The media won’t tell you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama’s case billions) of dollars to them in advertising.

    But the truth is, there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.
    The qu ality of the Republican candidate doesn’t matter. Obama gets reelected. Nine percent unemployment? No problem. Obama will win. Gas prices moving toward five dollars a gallon? He still wins. The economy soars or goes into the gutter. Obama wins. War in the Middle East ? He wins a second term.

    America’s role as the leading Superpower disappears? Hurrah for Barak Obama!
    The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama’s extraordinary deficit spending? Obama wins handily.

    You are crazy Williams. Don’t you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world conditions are declining? Sure I do.

    And that’s why I know Obama will win. The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics. And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.

    Even when Obama’s policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use to explain why it isn’t his fault. After all, things were much worse than understood when he took office.

    Obama’s reelection is really a very, very simple math problem. Consider the following:

    1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly. Period. Doesn’t matter what he does. It’s a race thing. He’ s one of us.

    2) College educated women will vote for Obama. Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory. It’s really not more complex than that.

    3) Liberals will vote for Obama. He is their great hope.

    4) Democrats will vote for Obama. He is the leader of their party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide.

    5) Hispanics will vote for Obama. He is the path to citizenship for those who are illegal and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic Party.

    6) Union members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their key to money and power in business, state and local politics.

    7) Big Business will support Obama. They already have. He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and is gaining more every day. Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda.

    8) The media love him. They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him. After all, to not love him would be racist.

    9) Most other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him. Oddly, the over-whelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won’t vote Republican. American Indians will support him. Obviously homosexuals tend to vote Democratic. And lastly,

    10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama. And he doesn’t need anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned. The President will win an overwhelming victory in 2012.

    – Dr. Walter Williams

    IN ADDITION TO THE VOTING BLOCKS HE MENTIONS, THERE IS ANOTHER HUGE GROUP: THE NEARLY ONE-HALF OF ALL ADULTS WHO DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES AND, IN FACT, MOST OF THEM RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THESE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO “SHAKE THE BOAT” TO DO ANYTHING TO STOP THE FLOW OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO THEMSELVES.

    It’s believed the United States is now somewhere between the “complacency and apathy” phase of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals – and they vote – then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

    If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

    If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that
    apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

  • Mountain Saint

    You can tell from some of the comments at this web site that the United States is no longer a Christian nation. The polls show that less than one-half of one percent of our young people have a biblical worldview, let alone any moral upbringing. ..What happened the last time a society was this way – and allowing rampant homosexuality – God had to destroy them with fire and brimstone (Luke 17:29)? It’s America’s turn next (Ezekiel 39:6 and Jeremiah 25:32-33)….God would have spared Sodom and Gormorrah if there were only a handful of righteous people but there were few (even Lot’s wife looked back and was destroyed). The same with America. …A true Christian Conservative president (like Ron Paul or Santorum) could gave us a little more time but eventually God will have to destroy this Godless nation (2 Timothy 3:1-5, 13) and spiritually-dead American Church (Revelation 3:14-19). That’s why He gave us Obama.

  • Pat

    The Republican elite hide behind “support for Religious Freedoms” the same way Gay men have hidden behind the cloth to do their evil deeds. Now those same Republican elite pull out all the stops to derail Santorum.

    If they manage to derail Santorum, the Republican Party can count on 4 more years of Obama. We will NOT stand for anymore back stabbing by the Republican godless elite!

    • Are You Serious

      Now that is really stupid. !!!!!

  • R. C.

    1st of all, JOHN Q. PUBLIC, that is us folks, have to relize that we can do things against what the person in the white house says we are not to do. We can elect a person who will block every presidential item that has NOT been auhorized by Congress. We need somebody who put our CONSTITUTION BACK ON TOP AGAIN.