Made Up My Mind

Posted on January 19, 2012 by Conservative Byte

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Bill

    Sounds good to me

    • Gail

      Now that Rick Santorum has been declared the legitimate winner in Iowa , winning by 34 votes over Romney, and it’s just come out that Newt supposedly proposed the idea to his second wife that he would like an open marriage between him, his wife and Clarissa, does anyone think Rick now has a chance of taking South Carolina after all? Then there’s Romney’s tax troubles….things are really getting interesting!

      • Leslie85223

        These are all “distractions”. Keep your eye on the ball to what’s really happening!!!

    • Moe

      Says how I feel, too, sincerely wanting one of those signs for my own yard.

  • June9245

    Me Too!

  • Old Timer

    Personally, I think that since Michele bachmann dropped out I would go with Ron Paul, but I will definitely go with the conservative ticket.

  • Patriot 101

    I wonder who is going to win. The Not Romney or the Not Ron Paul’s!
    I would bet that IF a poll were taken on the rabid NOT RON PAULS’, They are nearly all Romney voters!
    Now with FOX news solidly behind Gingrich or Romney and very much anti Ron Paul, it will be interesting to see how “smart” and educated the SC electorate is.
    Rick Perry is OUT! Over half of his vote will go to Ron Paul, the rest will be split by Santorum and Gingrich. Romney will get ALMOST NONE OF THE PERRY VOTE as it is all “Anybody but Romney” vote.
    I think it is shameful that Fox marches out pundit after pundit on O’Reilly, Hannity, to bash Ron Paul. They did it again by taking snippets of his answers from the debate to make it seem like he is “out of his head” on foreign policy.
    I formerly watched O’Reilly and Hannity every night, now they are off my DVR schedule! Might as well watch Jerry Springer!

    • whizkid

      Patriot,you give far too much credit to Fox!! They are NOT the ONLY ones who may occasionally bring up the publicly perceived view that Ron is “crazy”, irrational, with regards to absentee approach to Foreign Policy . It is Ron Paul, he is the one that stands at the podium and makes his quirky , jerky moves and facial expressions while espousing head in the sand absentee foreign policy plans . Ron’s biggest barrier to reaching any chance of becoming a serious contender is..Ron Paul!! Pretty much all engaged in the current political arena agree with his “Audit the Fed, eliminate the Fed!” push, as well as other economic issues. But that is where it ends with Paul. From there, it goes into The Badlands, into the Great Abyss. The Paulbots just refuse to accept that the majority of Americans do not embrace seriously flawed policy agendas that put America in not just serious danger, but in the corner of the room wearing the biggest Dunce hat in the world!!

      • wireline

        quirky, jerky? I suppose this is all a matter of perception for someone who is against Ron Paul to begin with and what he stands for. The limited power of government. and a return to the Constitution instead of just lip service to it.

        But that is too complicated for some folks to reason out.

        • Donald DeHoff

          “Wiireline”, you have not done your homework. Your loyalty to Paul is to be admired but it is misguided, as you surely do not understand the full implicatons of what libertarian really means. See my comments elsewere in this posting. In all of my research I find several countries that have groups or parties that have a libertarian bent, but no country with an overall libertarian outlook—as most all have evolved into socialism, facism and various forms of communism, which in turn frequently further evolves into dictatorships. Sir, look at history and the bigger long-range picture.

      • Paul

        @ “whizkid” – You should be calling us “Constitution-bots” you lousy, lame, , ignorant, anive, gullible, stupid, anti-American, NWO-stooge tool-fool…

        • Paul

          “naive”

      • Donald DeHoff

        “Whizkid”, setting politics aside for a moment, Paul is 77 years young (I am almost 80). I notice after each long debate he wanders around exhausted, almost in a stupor. I admire his intestinal fortitude but it is quite apparant that lacks the stamina to take on the the 24/7 duties of the oval office. I have made my political reservations in previous comments and will not repeat them here. Look at the bigger picture!

    • Nancy Bellinger

      Ron Paul is dangerous when it comes to our military and defense. And the idea that we can actually have peace talks with Iran is ludicrous. I am for Newt Gingrich, who I believe is the smartest person running and can be trusted. And I also believe he is the only one who can out-debate Romney. Even though Romney is the one the media is pushing, I still believe that a greater power controls all. God will have His say in the end.

      • wireline

        Well in that case lets pray that Ron Paul gets the win, unless we like to keep boxing ourselves into the slavery of ever increasing government power. Along with the coming encroachment Agenda 21 is bringing

      • Paul

        It’s characterstic of the American Republic that even the ignorant, naive, gullible, stupid, anti-American Constitution NWO-stooge tool-fools get to have an opinion and vote

        • Donald DeHoff

          Paul, perhaps true, but what would you do to solve that alleged problem—-more laws, rules, restrictions and controls?

          • Paul

            No, obey, support, defend, and actually USE the Constitution and all its Amendments, just like Ron paul has always and simply stated…

      • Janice Hurst

        I don’t know where you are listening to the news, but all I am hearing is that Romney has tax problems and has money stashed all over the place. If he had tax problems, we would have heard from the IRS before now-Obama would have made sure of that.
        What all of us need to be worried about is what Gingrich has been doing for all these years since thrown out of the Speaker’s job…besides cheating on wives and having affairs. Did you know that he wrote the forward to the “Socialist” manifesto book “Creating a New Civilization” by Toffler…the book decries how the Constitution is outdated and needs to be replaced. Gingrich is not a conservative…never was for smaller government and owed favors to may lobbyists for years. Younger people are not doing their homework on the Gingrich who was around during Reagan and Clinton. As for Ron Paul. I wish more of the candidates knew the Constitution and had the love for it that he does because I just don’t think he is electable.

        • Paul

          So you believe in/follow the naive folly of “not wanting to waste your vote” and want to “go along with the crowd (of lemmings/sheeple) that are electing the ‘winner’ “? That is lame ego, and false pride, and insipidly ignorant…

    • mike

      Patriot 101, did you watch the Monday night debate? If you did, and if you payed attention, you would see that Ron Paul Is an idiot on foreign policy.
      Bill O’Reilly nor Shawn Hannity made anything up. Ron Paul should take Glen Beck’s advice and quit talking about foreign policy. It is better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth a be known a fool.

      • wireline

        on that one point I might have to agree. Beck said to Ron Paul, when it comes to foreign policy, “Shhhhh” I think Beck actually likes to agree with him on almost everything else.

      • Paul

        Take your own “advice”!

    • DavidC

      I think it’s shameful that you simply can’t understand that Fox News is not rooting for anyone. They get paid to analyze current events. I’ve seen many pundits giving credit to Ron Paul when due. Get over yourself!

      • wireline

        Care to try and explain why they were jumping from the supposed winning candidate #1 in New Hampshire to supposed winning candidate #3 and for some reason just plain passing up supposed winning candidate #2???

        Why is that? Was there and agenda in play there? It sure looks that way

      • Paul

        Then YOU are one dumb fanatical “fan” of that lousy, hypocrite-and-demagogue Bull O’Really…

    • al

      Patriot 101…did you watch Hannity last night?
      Jerry Springer is an Obama’s lover….
      Perhaps you should look for another show

    • wireline

      Just goes to show what good little neo-cons they all are, except for the Judge, he is the only one on Fox who understands the Constitution and what it really means to have government follow it and the rest are following the marching orders of the “Party”

    • JAX CAT

      Hannity made that possible last evening. Jerry Springer is at least as nuts as Ron Paul.
      Listen to his ideas on capitalism – which by the way has made him financially ssecure.
      Its good for him, but not good for this country. He would make a great congressman.

    • Donald DeHoff

      “Patriot 101″. A couple of facts; First, Paul is an an admitted full blown libertarian. Second, most Americans, including those supporting Paul do not fully understand what being libertarian is all about. All of you should ask Google, “Ever a country with a libertarian idiology”. The many responses will vary but most all clearly reveal that countries starting with a libertarian intent, quickly evolved into a socialist, facist or communist state, which in turn evolved into dictatorships. Europe and Asia today are rampant with such countries. Let us try and solve our problems by “tweeking” our Constitution by amendments to rid ourselves of the greedy, corrupt and power seeking fanatics in our government, unions and big business, instead of revolutionary methods that will surely result in blood in the streets. Let us not throw out the baby with the dirty bath water. The United States since WW-II has by default, become the peacekeeper of the world. True, we have not stopped all wars (particularly recently), but if it were not for our world-wide presence, anarchy would be flourishing most everywhere. And true, America is not perfect, but we stand head and shoulders above most other countries in the world. The entire world will be a lessor place if we remove our presence from abroad. Remember the CFP slogan, “…Because, Without America, there is no free world”! Everyone should plant that slogan in their head and let it influence anything and everthing we do. Yes, our Republic can be saved! And, I am not a fan or supporter of Romney—with the way the chips (politicians) are falling, I have to say Newt is our best bet. He is the most experienced and knowledgeable man in Washington today. However, we do need to get him “into line” on such issues as the Second Amendment, term limits, border control, illegals, balanced budget, Sharia Law, and a host of other issues.

  • Dudley

    @ Patriot 101
    Watch Judge Napolitano instead. You don’t get the “not Paul” bias.

    • wireline

      yep the judge included a credit to Ron Paul in his new book I read on the internet yesterday. The Judge knows…

  • ACACIA

    that cartoon hit the nail right on the head keep up the good work

  • The Lion Den Roars

    ANYTHING , WOULD BE BETTER THAN THIS ,DRUGGED OUT HOMO , MUSLIM

    • Paul

      “Anything” EXCEPT one of the NWO-stooge mole candidates that we have been “given”to choose from (not counting Ron Paul, of course – that man IS a COnstitutional STATESMAN!) – so far FOUR NWO-stooge moles are GONE, and GOOD RIDDANCE!

      • VT Patriot

        I guess you brilliant paul-bots believe that by countering any constructive information leads to your “RP2012″ mantra. I’m so sick of hearing that cr*p that I can’t stand to even listen to him anymore. You bots could actually learn something if you could ever open your warped mind and maybe, just maybe, explore other peoples ideas, You may be able to make a legitimate judgement. Enuf please of the RP2012 – RP2012 monologue.

        • Paul

          How’s this: “Drop dead you lousy anti-Constituion NWO-stooge tool-fool”?

          “Paulbot” = “Constitutionbot” and THAT is what every red-blooded and patriotic American should be!

  • Donald DeHoff

    There is a lot going on in the political arena, as to who is going to be the “chosen ones” to duke it our for the final event—but I see very little being said about who will be the Vice President. Many of the top runners our approaching “old age” (I am almost 80), and the VP must be as fully qualified as “number one”. I am sure the “top dogs” are going to select a women as VP to get the female vote, but in the overall mix of international relations, that would be a grievous mistake. About half of the world is controlled by men who believe that women are inferior and their sole purpose in life is to be at the beck and call of their husbands for sex and to remain home and raise children. With that philosophy, those men are not going to give a female their just due across international negotiating tables. Women’s time will come, but for right now, it is premature. International tensions concerning cultures, philosophies and religion are at an all time high and it is no time to be “experimenting”. Now, I must sign off, lock the doors, turn off my cell-phone and computer, as already I hear and see a storm on the horizon.

  • Nick

    A.B.O. Be careful what you wish for. You just might get another one just like barry (i.e. romney, gingrich, santorum) in all the ways the banking elites want.

    • Susie Liberty

      Exactly, Nick… And the group you mention have unlimited funding to accomplish what they want…that being to have someone there whom they can “buy”.