Dr. Ron Paul: 6 Reasons He Is Electable and Will Win

Print Friendly

Contrary to the false propaganda proclaiming that Dr. Ron Paul is “not electable”, his numbers are rising, his support growing and he stands an excellent chance of winning both the GOP nomination and the 2012 presidential race.

Dr. Paul’s opponents are desperate to stop Americans from listening to, and subsequently electing Ron Paul. Opponents of liberty falsely present Ron Paul as “unelectable” to the American people, attempting to plant subconscious seeds doubt of “don’t listen to him, don’t vote for him in the primaries or caucuses because he’ll never win”. This strategy is failing as more Americans hear Dr. Paul speak, leading them to contribute to his campaign and vote for him. The American public understands Dr. Paul’s common sense approach and trusts him. The other candidates are clearly in the race to serve their egos and personal agendas. The “Dr. Paul is not electable” rumors are deliberately created and spread solely as a calculated attempt to confuse honest, hard-working American with falsehoods such as “Ron Paul is crazy, anti-women, anti-Israel and anti-blacks. He’s isolationist, he’ll wreck the country, he’s anti-government”. These are simple “control the masses” fear tactics to try and stop Americans from actually listening to Dr. Paul, hearing his logical and intelligent plan and deciding for themselves.

Continue Reading on www.huffingtonpost.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
Posting Policy:
The 1st Amendment protects the right to freedom of expression from government interference. However, you are currently posting on private web property and your comments are bound by our site's policies. We have a zero-tolerance policy for comments containing violence (threats, suggestions or direct statements permitting violent or threatening acts or sentiments), racism (suggestion that one "race" is superior to others), crassness or profanity (any word or phrase considered by courteous society to be profane), all caps (a violation of internet etiquette), discourteous behavior (calling names, rude or insulting statements directed at another user/post) or violations similar in nature to any of these offenses. Posts violating our policies of posting are subject to removal and the user may face banning. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
  • Concerned Citizen

    He’s 100% better than Romney who is a DemonRat in an elephant suit. At least Ron Paul won’t be bowing down to George Sore-ass. He believes in taking this country back to the American people. While the others are selling us out. If people can’t see that then they need to stop listening to the lame, lying mainstream media and read ConservativeByte where the people tell the truth. “The truth will set you free.” I say, Go, Ron, Go. Beat Obonzo — America’s arch enemy in our White House. See website: http://www.haasstrep68.com

    • Willy

      I can live with that. Go Paul!

      • Bev

        Just shoot me now!……… that man is a fool

        • Randy

          Bev–As the saying goes it takes one to know one! You probably still support BO the Duperman.

          • Homer Carnes

            Anyone that thinks we are alone on this planet, that does not know there are millions that want to kill us, SHOULD vote for Ron Paul.
            If you do, you better convert to the Muslim faith, learn to kill the infidales.

          • Clifford Johnson

            Just because Bev does not support a moron does not make her an Obamler supporter. It just makes her a sane,thinking individual. One that has the cognitive reasoning skills to understand that ron paul is insane.

          • Clifford Johnson

            Annie you bring up a good point. McCain was 72 years old when he ran for President. ron paul is 76 years old. Do you people remember what an issue the Dummycrats made of McCain’s age? They got a bunch of old people on television saying they would not want some one their age running for President. Also, another good point is who would run on the ticket with him? No sane person would ever run on the ticket with ron paul. Certainly not any known, qualified candidate. After ron paul died in office (notice I did’nt say “when”) who would be there to succeed him? This whole ron paul thing is just insanity on stilts.

          • Starapple

            Clifford and Bev….I totally agree. If the voters are insane enough to elect this doddering flake (Paul), we can without a doubt, prepare for 4 more years under the dictatorship of comrade Obama.

          • daves

            The last Republican debate was the 427th of 2,000 debates to be held between now and when President Obama is re-elected.

          • k9maiden

            Randy, now you sound like the liberals! Bev has a right to her opinion, I am definitely not a Paul supporter, but if he should get the nomination against BO, I would be forced to vote for him. I just hope Paul doesn’t throw his country that he proclaims to love to the wolves and run as a third party. The liberals and BO are counting on that to win 2012.

          • Alice Smith

            k9maiden, There’s something you’re not taking into account. There are many of us out here in the voting public, (and it’s ever growing) where our conscience will not allow us to vote for the ‘lessor of two evils’. In the last election, I was an elected pco for my county Republican Party. I refused to vote for McCain. I voted for a third party. The republican party leadership betrayed their base a long time ago. They consistently will promote the bottom feeders that don’t threaten their status quo. (I suspect the same is going on with the dems) So, you’ll vote for whoever the Republican Party shoves under your nose whether you think they’d make a good president or not? Why would you feel forced to vote for whoever they nominate?

            Our country is in the shape that it’s in, BECAUSE of people that will vote for whoever their party shoves under their nose, no matter how stinky the person. Personally, I hold at fault, for the sorry shape our country is in, directly in the hands of those that treat elections like they’re voting for their favorite football team no matter what they shove at them. Personally, I’m sick of hearing these same people complain, because they need to look in the mirror and point the finger at themselves.

          • http://ActionAmerica.org/ John Gaver

            Six reasons why Paul is a loony, who won’t possibly ever be taken seriously.

            Six.

            That’s the number of his brain cells.

          • Bruce D.

            Let’s not forget Iran is basically a suicidal nation willing to do anything for Allah (which basically means maintain the power structure of the ruling elite). Therefore it must be stopped.
            If Ron Paul could have articulated a more sensible foreign policy I think he would have been elected for president. I think some people do not realize how dangerous radiation is. It can get into the trade winds and have a devastating effect on the human body and humanity as a whole.

          • Neb

            Ron Paul is no fool, but you just showed everyone that you are!

          • Roy

            YOU GOT THAT RIGHT BEV (AMEN)

          • Vern

            No Randy, Bev just has good common sense. Ron has some good ideas, but he won’t protect America. He
            would be better than Obama, but there are others that
            would be better for the USA.

          • Stephanie

            Good for you!

        • The Great Ricardo

          Right after I bite one myself and yes, the man is a loonie.

          • Willis

            Bite on.

          • ANNIE

            plus..look at how old he is…i would not want my grandpa run for pres…he would never live long enough…he is sickly lookly…..much too old…remember when everyone said mc cain was too old????? this guy has to be 20 yrs older….my god people get a grip..do you want a pres for 4 yrs??? or one month????? who will take over..some goon….get real!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Boliver Tugnasty

            Just for the sake of argument (the fun part), I surely would like an articulate statesman for our next president, not some whiney sounding old uncle. It matters little how much sense anyone makes if they sound as if they’ve got testicular torsion and wheezing out their sentences. Listen to Ron Paul for anything longer than 45 seconds and one is already tired.

          • Neb

            Just keep biting, you’ll be ok soon!

          • Johnnygard

            I wondered who wrote this and then I saw it was from the Hufpost. “The other candidates are clearly in the race to serve their egos and personal agendas.” Do you think maybe there was a little bias on the part of the author?

          • http://none FAT Sue.

            No he is not a loonie. He is a lot smarter than your mama.

        • eugene

          Bev must be a plant, too.

          • Starapple

            Bev is not a plant, just as sane as I am.

          • Wayne

            Ron Paul is 6 years younger than me. I am 82 years old and i think that i could make 4 more years. If Ron Paul has health problems i am sure that the other candidates would jump on him like a mad dog.

          • Joe

            I think your right she sounds like some sort of vegetation!

        • csh

          I think you just shot yourself.

        • Mike

          I didn’t know this site was taken over by the Paulbots. Folks, this 76 year “old” candidate is 20 years too late. He has some good ideas on the economy and the Constitution, but he would have as much chance of beating the smooth talker as Mr. Reach Across the aisle. I shudder to think of him being on the same stage and trying to argue with this President.

          • ANNIE

            he would probably have a stroke…time for a nap paul…go home and get some rest…he will never make it to the election!!!!!

          • tommie3761

            Mike, you forget that Obama can’t string 2 words together without a teleprompter. All the other candidates are either liberal Republicrats or self-serving egotists. Paul may be old and his ideas are true libertarian-constiutionist based (which scare the hell out of big government liberals), but he he is anything but a bigot or nut-job as the MSM want everyone to believe. If you are a liberal, your colors will show.

          • edward Shick

            Make it equal take away Obama teleprompter

          • Clifford Johnson

            Please people you need to understand that these Conservative sites are monitored and posted on by the radical left wing nut jobs. There are many libiots that just spend their day putting up posts on Conservative sites that may make it seem like ron paul’s support is greater than it is. They want to make ron paul look electable (the article these posts are coming from was published in the Huffington Post–the most left wing nut job rag on planet earth.) and seem likr his support is a broad based support when it is not. Don’t get too worked up over some of these posts. Just remember that many of the supposed ron paul “followers” are left wing nut jobs trying to stir up sh–!

          • Justwhistlingdixie

            So, You think “old” is bad and is reason enogh to vote against someone, even though they are the best person for the job. I doubt you have the menta faculties to begin to comprehend just how utterly commuunistic your beleif system is. But, I have little doubt that you consider yourself to be a “CONSRVATIVE.”

            People, that has been prcisely what I have been trying to get you to understand, Conservativism is nothing more than a label, and a mask which people hide behind. When and if, anyone with the ability to think for themselves, does so, they will readily identify the false prophets, and ignore them for what they are, human recepticals of disinformation from the enemies of our free republic, liberties and individual freedoms.

          • bevad

            Ron Paul cannot obtain the Republican nomination. While he has his loyal cadre of followers, he is just too “different” for a majority of American voters. Romney will be the nominee. One can only hope that Ron Paul will then have the good sense not to run as an independent, third party candidate. To do so would ensure that Obama is re-elected.

          • Rekab

            There is wisdom in years. I am old, but I am not washed-up. To make Dr. Paul’s age an issue is as ridiculous as is calling Mr. Obama a smooth talker without his teleprompter.

          • RonW

            Obama will spend every penny in his war chest to make sure he never has to face Ron Paul in front of the American masses. He knows that when the masses. Who will be watching then. Will get to see what his real agenda is. And he also knows his voting record is a matter of documented public record. He will crash and burn. And he knows it. “Its them pesky little facts” He is selling out America. He is OWNED.

            The RNC has an empty tool chest. No stallion in the stable. Nothing in the study but a malware infected pc. The laundry room needs activity. The powder room filled with pretty faces getting ready for the next debate. A broom closet with open door, and a living room with an energetic old man cleaning up the remnants of a shattered wall hanging picture frame, and removing the glass shards from a copy of our US Constitution.

            And yet. Most of you sit and talk about the wannabees that the RNC and their media lapdogs want you to talk about.

            This is for John and Bobby Kennedy May they rest in peace.

            For those that really care about America and interested in taking her back from the scoundrels that stole her and our self esteem 98 years ago in 1913 All of America’s serious currant and past problems begins on 12-23-913 when the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT was made law. America’s problems will continue until the moment that TREASON is abolished.

            The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. which is a privately owned and operated bank. That a cartel of International bankers, old money investors, and their front men such as J.P.MORGAN in concert with others. Using deception, guile, extortion, blackmail and even murder. Forced upon We The People, without our knowledge and consent. The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. Name chosen with intent to “mislead”. Creates “illusion” of governmental association.

            Also in 1913, they gave us while in a state of peacetime, unconstitutional Federal Income tax. which also gave birth to the I.R.S. Our constitution does allow for tax on citizens not profiting from doing business with The US Govt, but only in times of war. To fund an Army. And orders Termination at wars end. How was this allowed to happen?

            The same criminals then in 1931 had perfected into law a bill that made them legally bullet proof.
            The same crooks in 1933 got a bill passed that authorized total operational secrecy.

            The same group of Thugs then persuaded a sitting President into issuing a EXECUTIVE ORDER that made The keeping of Gold Bullion and Coins legally owned by Constitutionally protected American citizens to be illegal and all must be traded in to the Federal Reserve Bank. For pieces of paper called FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

            End of 2011 Congressman Ron Paul gets a bill perfected and forces them to provide ledger’s regarding Bail out money distribution. ( 9 trillion unaccounted for)

            For the RNC to mull over. We are fed up with the “Anybody but Obama mantra. Old tactic. non starter. Listen up! We Paulites will NOT! transfer our votes to ANYBODY!. We have chosen our CHAMPION. Doc Paul has no say. We will write him in. Why you ask? Because one. your dirty. or two, your are cowards. or three, you just can’t find a Stallion that is clean, has guts, and will make ending the FED. MISSION NUMBER ONE. Just nobody home.

            Not one with the guts and intention of fixing the root cause of America’s problem. To make
            Matters worse. Everybody in Washington knows EXACTLY what that problem is. Kind of hard to take out the trash. If you are the trash. Also kind of hard to take out the trash if you fear the trash can.

            NOT THIS TIME!
            WE CHOOSE RON PAUL
            ITS DOC PAUL ALL THE WAY TO NOVEMBER
            YOUR CALL?

            As we speak. Some politicians in DC are wishing they had brought more depends with them. Scampering about doing damage control and trying to get a bill rushed thru to hide the one that has been so good for some of them. You know. The one that gives legislators legal shelter from INSIDER TRADER charges.

            Lets talk PATRIOT ACT.= Workaround Constitutional protections. ACT OF WAR upon and against the constitution our Country and we the people that it defends.

            Lets talk NDAA The same. Both leave in place the document that is America/s foundation.
            No Constitution.= No Legislature. = No USA
            HOLDER? FBI? LOYAL GENERAL? DC METER MAID? ANYBODY?

            As junior said. ” YOU ARE EITHER WITH US.. OR YOU ARE WITH THEM.

          • k9maiden

            I agree! Talk about Saul Alinsky tactics! I’m beginning to thing some of these people are really BO supporters in the guise of a Conservative for Ron Paul. They are so insulting and infantile in their responses, they HAVE to be liberals!

          • http://verizon.net Bud

            That is the point. Do you want the nominee to be one who would clearly out debate Obama? If you are thinking that would be Paul, you are sadly mistaken. I would think after all the debates that have taken place, you would have seen that he rambles, does not answer some questions and diverts the subject to another. He has also made many very concerned about his views on Iran and the middle east. He drew loud boos from the crowd on this and also when he said he would deny foreign aid to Israel if we cut off foreign aid. Where exactly are we going to place all the troops he wants to bring home? We do not have the capacity for them now and would have to reopen or build new ones to accommodate them and their families.
            As one other said, I will vote for him if he becomes the nominee but he definitely isn’t my preference.

          • Laurie

            Sadly, despite ANY of his GOOD ideas, he comes across as a whiney Grandpa. What would one expect of something coming from the Huffington Post? THAT is exactly where the PaulBots (trolls) come from.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            mike……i really admire the dedication that the ron paul people have for their candidate….WE COULD USE THEIR EXAMPLE FOR OUR CANDIDATES…!!!!!right…. RON PAUL IS NOT AN IDIOT AS YOU ALL SEEM TO THINK……he was a med. dr. and did good things ……but at his age and because of some of his radical beleifs…..it scares so many of us……our nation is on the brink of collapse….and i am not sure that we have ANY candidate that can beat the whole rotten system …it has gone so far………..ron paul needs to retire …it is a big exasting job to be pres……

          • Christian Patriot

            Ron W. If you write in Paul’s name if his name is not on the ballot YOU are the one giving the vote to BO. If a candidates name is not on the ballot DO NOT write in someone else. We have to vote united or divided we WILL fall. We have one chance to get this right or we lose America and our way of life. No matter which republican is voted in it will take more than this next election to correct everything that has been done against this country and constitution. So vote and vote united to first get BO out and then stay awake and working at getting rid of the rest of the progressives and ineligibles who are there now. It will still take a lot of work and time from US, from We The People, to correct the direction of this nation back to the original constitutional republic – no matter which republican is voted in. If we go back to sleep again after this election the same will continue. Maybe at a slowed pace again but it will continue.

          • csh

            We’re done with smooth talkers. we’ve seen where that has gotten us…… sold down the river. We just simply want someone who will lead this country according to the Constitution, as it recognizes the rights of the people. I don’t see Ron Paul’s age as a problem at all. He definitely has already shown that he is healthier in mind than the others. He at least remembers his positions on issues…. not like these flip-floppers who can change from day to day. What benefit is there to a guy who is a young, but a hypocrite to his oath in office, his country, and “The People” ? NONE. I will take the solid, proven, tried and true constitutionalist….. Ron Paul.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            He was whacko 30 years ago. A prime example of a libertarian and the reasons are simple he has denonounced both Lincoln and Reagan his form of government would led us down the same road as Obama using the Constitution as a club Obama gives us nothing and Paul would give us everything.

          • American Patriot

            tommie3761,
            Ron Paul is the best of the field by a country mile. He would pick a cabinet that would also be the best. He is very capable for his age and 76 is not too old for a man that has lived a good clean life like he has. I have a doctor friend in his mid eighties, that like Dr Paul has taken good care of himself is sharper then any fifty year old liberal.
            Dr Paul don’t need teleprompters to tell the facts the way they are.

          • TheThinMan

            The problem with all of you is that Ron Paul may be 76, has lot’s of experience, and is probably a tough old bird that will live to be 106 – since he probably takes better care of himself than most of you do of yourselves.

            I have not been a Ron Paul supporter and still much prefer Newt – but I’d take Ron P in a heartbeat over Mitten Romney

          • Roy

            Wisdom comes with age and from learning from our misstakes.all you young whiper snaper.

          • amagi

            Dear Mike,

            It would be very interesting to hear Obama vs Paul
            as Dr. Paul is FOR America and Obama – oh so obviously – against everything our country stands for.

        • Patricia Gault

          Bev, that fool as you call him, has been predicting this financial collapse of our economy for more than twenty years. Better educate yourself.

          • Nannyroo

            When Pauls reforms take place he will be dead in the grave. Only our children will have to live with his reforms. Poor kids.

          • http://verizon.net Bud

            Patricia: Paul has also been in Congress for a long time and exactly what has he done about it? Republicans did have control during his tenure but I don’t recall seeing his name pop up regarding fiscal responsibility. He has recently gone after the Federal Reserve which comes at a convenient time but don’t expect much to come of this as he has no idea how powerful they are. Paul has already back pedaled on this where he said before he would eliminate the Federal Reserve. He recently said he would not eliminate it but make changes which may be possible and rightfully needed.
            You need to know that all the nominees can promise what they will do. How many Presidents have in fact done this?
            It isn’t because they haven’t tried but the other branches of Government that resisted their agenda. Obama goes around Congress with rules and regulations but this is going to stop or he will eventually be indicted for ignoring laws and the constitution. Some say you can’t impeach an ineligible president but you sure can rule his term null and void and indict him for being ineligible.
            Paul would be a far cry better than Obama but he is not my choice. I will vote for him, unlike the other Paul supporters who say they won’t vote for some else and give the election to Obama. That is poor judgement in my thinking.

        • Paul

          I’d be happy to shoot you, you stupid hag…

          • Millicent

            Typical lowlife Ron Paul supporter. They are known for making threats. Just proves what trash he and his antiAmerian supporters.

          • csh

            Millicent, maybe you missed Bev’s stupid comment. She said, “Just shoot me”….

            She shouldn’t make stupid comments like that, for she only invites someone to oblige her ….

            If someone wants to be critical of a position or policy, that is one thing, but to just talk stupid…. well, you just open yourself up for a rhetorical comment.

            So Bev…. don’t be stupid….. read the Constitution.

          • Frankie1429

            Many years ago I heard a very wise man say that it is easy to spot a true liberal and a true conservative. When they have a difference of opinion, the conservative will say, “You are entitled to your opinion.” and the liberal will say.’If you don’t see things my way, you’re a complete idiot.” Over the years, I have seen this time and again. I see a lot of name calling and intolerance right here. Its a shame we can’t see this as a fight for the same goal, but from different avenues of attack.

          • American Patriot

            Milliscent,
            You and your lowlife swine kind can vote for whatever you choose.

          • http://none FAT Sue.

            Ron Paul makes a good President. VOTE FOR HIM.

          • SteveinWv

            Milicent: I have been following you around all these forums, spouting your bs from site to site. Your unintelligent remarks continue to baffle me, with no proof whatsoever.
            * We are 15 trillion in debt, which just surpassed our GDP for the first time ever.
            * We have over 717 military facilities all over foreign lands consuming 2,250,000 acres of land, while utilizing 100k+ troops and a whopping 1 trillion dollar price tag.
            * Our government is now 51% of our workforce….wow!
            * Our middle class is just about gone, and we have about 140 million people on welfare, unemployment, and/or other entitlement programs.
            * We have illegals pouring into this country by the hundreds of thousands monthly grabbing jobs we can not afford to give, paying no taxes and scarfing up the free healthcare like a free loading demmie on handout day.
            AND YOU WANT ME ME TO VOTE FOR THE SAME OLD SH(I)T AGAIN!!!
            I don’t think so, give me RON PAUL or nothing, because nothing would be better than what is out there now! My kids will never see the freedoms I once had and will never see again. You so called conservatives want to police the world, globalizing and conquering. Countries have stated they don’t want us there, we piss off everyone, and you wonder why we are hated, US govt corrupts everything they touch. The only true by definition conservative is Ron Paul. You all want to police the world, want to spend borrowed money, want to give to the those with open hands, start wars with those with different ideology. The debt collector is now at the door wanting their money that we can’t pay, so what are you going to do, and what are your going to cut???? You can’t have it both ways!!!! Ron isn’t so crazy now is he??? You know the difference between a Dem and a Rep? One has a trunk, the other a long tail, both are just extra baggage, so forgive me if I don’t weigh the difference between Obummer and Newt/Romney. Our founding fathers also warned us about a 2 party system, so again, forgive me if a third aprty comes out of this as well!

        • MsgtGdubb

          I agree with Bev. The stupidity that comes out of Pauls mouth is unbelievable. He thinks we can ignore Iran, Venezuela, and be nice to the muslim killers and they will be nice. You cannot negotiate with murderers out of weakness. Ron Paul is a Republican, “Jimmy Carter”. He would embarrass the U.S.

          • Laurie

            He’s NOT a Republican. He’s taken on that label ONLY to endeavor his agenda. He’s clearly a full-on LIBERTARIAN, and not as smart as Ross Perot.

          • Tenacity

            Dr. Paul has never said he would ignore Iran or be nice to muslim killers. If you believe he would negotiate with murderers, much less out of weakness, you are illustrating how little you know about the man. You have not listened to Dr. Paul, but have only projected onto him what the bankster establishment has propagandized you with. Do your homework, understand how we have been lied to all along and then you might be able to hear what Dr. Paul is trying to tell you. Here is a good place to start getting educated: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoB80Yk9NYg

          • csh

            Ron Paul does not “ignore” anything….. he just addresses it in a constitutional way….. you know…. that founding document that we are supposed to be living by. There is a constitutional process in which we are supposed to go by, for good reason. Our forefathers were well aware of how tyrannical governments were formed and the dangers of not having a balance of power. Ron Paul wants to recognize our founding document again in all aspects… which include foreign affairs.

            Not too smart to just ride the wave of propaganda spewn out from a BIG government platform looking to continue to keep us indefinitely in war, so as to keep us all indefinitely under their thumb…. constantly infringing on our rights over and over again until there are none obvious to the onlooker anymore. There is more terror shown from a tyrannical government against its own people, as we have seen through some of these outrageous, unconstitutional bills supported by RINOs, than what is coming from Iran.

            I’m for the guy who will lead by the Constitution.
            Voting for Ron Paul is voting for the Constitution.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            He himself Paul has said he is not a Republican nor a Conservative

          • Dagny

            Jonathan, I see you post your lies all over the net and I’m quite sick of it. Rep. Paul never said any such thing, as I’m sure you know perfectly well. You post lies as supposed facts, with no verification of course, and expect people to believe you. Are you so mentally ill you get your jollies like that, or are you being paid to defame Rep. Paul?

          • TheThinMan

            So, let’s go to war with the whole world – I’m sure if we get just a couple seconds head start we can blow Iran, Venezuela and even N. Korea off the map and there wouldn’t be a single objection – except from Russia and China – and they aren’t quite ready to take us on yet.

          • http://verizon.net Bud

            MsgtGdubb:

            I agree with what you said except for Ron Paul being a Republican. He is and always has been a Libertarian and his son is as well. They ran as Republicans to get elected and there is nothing wrong with this except for identifying what they represent which I have no problem with.
            It is too late for a third party to form and anyone with half a brain knows it is vitally important that Obama be defeated in November of 2012. The Republicans will need every vote to win. Hopefully, the Independents see it the same way since the Republican vote will not be enough to overcome an even split among Independents and the illegal voters Democrats use.
            I think it is very possible within the next four years that a third party will emerge and oddly enough it will be the Democrats, not the Republicans who will be on the losing end. Why? One in six Democrats are moving to either Independent or Republican because they are fed up with their party. The rate of flow among Republicans is far less but they also are moving to Independent status.
            The reality is the Democrats could become the third ranking party in numbers.

          • http://none Little Willy.

            No he wont. Ron Paul will lift us up. Please vote for Ron Paul.

        • Boliver Tugnasty

          If Ron Paul had a cogent military policy it might be different (he was physician in the Air Force, not a line officer with any strategic insight). He comes across as isolationist and wimpy. We cannot “deal” with Iran, for instance, with the same pussy-footing that Dumbo has done. The Mid-East is more dangerous than ever.

          And his libertarian views on marijuana (and other drug use) is abyssmal. Like we need something more to worry about than alcohol on the roads, or tons more addicts (now legitimized by a liberal drug policy), or millions more on the public dole because they are hooked on something…and I don’t mean hooked on phonics. He says the War on Drugs has failed; but I say, we’ve not yet begun to fight. We need to kick butt severely, and start with building a fence between Mexico and U.S., that’s step 1. Then we arm it with machine guns and create a free-fire zone. Step 2: We put all pushers and addicts in work camps and make those turds do something productive, anything, growing vegetables for the homeless, or cleaning up all the cigarette butts on the streets and sidewalks. Step 3: We put all the Demokratz on buses and send them south of the fence we just built.

          • Ed

            Yeah, no thanks.

          • Laurie

            Love it!

          • Joyce

            You are right, Just think of putting your life on the line working with someone who is high. Think of the companies and lawsuits to come from this assinine, Ron Paul. We MUST close our borders, remove the illegals, make English the mandatory language. Do not press1 for English.
            Remove drug users from welfare, make people who are on welfare work at something, even if it’s going to a trade school. Teach them something other than being a baby factory.

          • Neb

            Why do you “WANT” to deal with Iran? Ron Paul wants to end wars not start them. We can only go so much further in pushing other countries and cultures and people around. Sooner or later there will be a overwhelming force that will crush us! Get your head out of the sand and stop telling lies about Paul! He is the only one to take us back to a constitutional government, and that says more than you can ever come up with! You over look that one factor and you loose it all!

          • TheThinMan

            So, which of the candidates (including Obama) has any military leadership?

        • Andrew

          who’s BO

          • Ellen

            BO are the 2 armpits in the W. H. & both stink!

          • k9maiden

            Barrack Obama
            Now I know by the response Paul just made that you are indeed BO supporters. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out Paul. After all, if you are a Ron Paul supporter aren’t you suppose to sit and talk peacefully to the enemy and not use any type of force at all? Isn’t that what the huge difference between Paul supporters and the rest of the candidates have in common? Sit and talk to Iranians and the Taliban, Alquaida, and Islamic terrorist in general and make nicey with them while they chop off our heads, kill our youth, and torture and rape our women. You cannot reason with monsters any more than you can reason with a liberal! So, don’t try and disguise yourself as Paul fans, anyone with common sense can see right through you!

          • http://conservativebyte.com loha

            Joyce, I absolutely agree with you!!! Esp. about the gross abuse of Welfare!!!

          • http://none Little Willy.

            Ron Paul has a military leadership.

        • UncleRoy1

          Bev: That statement makes you “Idiot of the Day” – try paying attention instead of just spouting lib/MSM talking points.
          Use your head, THINK, be different from the other sheeple lining the streets and taking up space.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Bev, you got kakaa for brains and that goes for the rest of you ignorant, imbecilic Ron Paul bashers too. Just shows that you don’t have a f&%ing clue.

          GO RON PAUL 2012!!!

        • Average Joe

          Lets see, fool? Ron Paul wants you and me to make choices with our own minds and then live with the consaqense of thoses choices. That is what gave us our rights in the first place. Of those that signed the declration of independants almost to A man Died early, died broke, or lived A deminshed life. Look it up. There is A saying thats been floating around for more than 200 years and is just as relovent today as it was back then. Freedom is never free. You have your rights because these men made A choice and lived with the consaqenses. Sorry abought the spelling I’m not the spelling gistopo

          • Sarah Says

            Exactly! Also, people have to remember that freedom is a two way street. People say they don’t want Government interfering and involved in their lives and want them out, but then turn around and want Government involved in and making decisions regarding certain issues. In order for you to keep and maintain your freedom, you must let others have their freedom. Each and every freedom you take from someone else, eventually you will be taking away your own freedom. It is not my way or the highway attitude. We all must give a little. If someone wants to drink alcohol, smoke some weed, smoke cigarettes, have an abortion or whatever for example, they should be free to do so without interference from Government and fellow citizens. I might not like what they are doing, but in reality it is none of my business and it is up to them to make their own decisions and live with the consequences of their own actions.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            That is correct however libertarians do not have the same moral compass or ethics that the founding fathers gave us. And Paul is the epitome of a libertarian not a Conservative nor a Republican. He out of his own mouth has denonounced both Lincoln and Reagan

        • tod

          Dr.Ron Paul 2012 for the ONLY PROVEN HONEST ( for Well Over 30 Years ) PATRIOT running for President,PERIOD !!!

          • Richard

            Hear, hear!!!!!!!! Yes, Paul in 2012. WTFU America!

          • Joy

            Ron Paul the only proven idoit running for President. This man allowed drugs to flow so heavy at his Campaign Headquaters in Iowa there were brawls and other major incidences there that were horrible. Paul is being pushed by the left to destroy the right from electing a canidate that will destroy the Usurper President. Obama and Crew are close to destroying America and as long as they keep the right divided with idoits like Paul and Romney they are happy. Newt can save the Country and our Constitution!!

          • Millicent

            Honest my foot. he violates Art.1 Section 8 of the Constitution for 24 years. he is #4 on bringing home the bacon. Ron Paul is an evil vile pile of offal on the order of Benedict Arnold.

          • Dagny

            Joy and Millicent are at it again. Joy may be stupid and a liar, but at least she admits to supporting that pathetic Grinch. Millicent is just a vile, evil degenerate.

          • http://none Little Willy.

            Yes tod. Go Ron Paul. GO!

        • Benjamin Napier

          Ron Paul is the only cadidate running that understands the Constitution and basic economics. We cannot continue to borrow and spend. Not for social projects and not for our wars. It is done. We either stop or we will necessarily collapse and take the world down with us.

          • http://none BIG Willy.

            Yes. I agree with you. Ron Paul is the man.

        • Sheila

          I agree. Paul has some good ideas, but his foreign policy is unrealistic. He is a poor communicator and flits from one topic to another making it difficult to get his point across. Not a good characteristic in a President. As our representative around the world the content of his speaches have to be precise. I haven’t yet seen that in Ron Paul. He’s brought a lot of good ideas to the table, but some of his ideas are too far out there for the average American. His contribution has been good for opening dialogue on a lot of more libertarian ideas and that’s good, but a lot of it isn’t practical. Another problem is that he gives the impression of being an idealogue. We’re already having problems with one of those in the White House now. We don’t need another one. We need someone who can stick to their principles and get something done. Idealogs aren’t successful in their approach of “It’s my way or the highway”. Ron Paul is just simply not Presidential material. He would best serve in a cabinet position or in an advisory capacity to the President representing the Libertarian viewpoint.

          • john in Texas

            Wow Sheila , Well said ,Polite too , I like that , Your so right on Dr. Paul , he often comes across somewhat like John McCain ,who often appeared slightly senile , he’s definitely a Patriot ,But right now defense is vital if we are to survive . Someone mentioned several million who want to torture us to death, make that a Billion at this point & growing at an exponential rate . So ,basically our defense needs would rule out Dr. Paul as a wise choice for Commander in Chief .

          • Laurie

            Well said… :)

          • Neb

            Ron Paul is 100% for the constitution, and the
            “ONLY ONE”
            who is 100% pro Second Amendment!

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            SHIELA, YOU ARE SO RIGHT…. RON PAUL IS NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL…LOONY TUNES IS MORE LIKE IT… VERY SCARY ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS…SAYING WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 911…MORE OTHER ISSUES THAT ARE DANGEROUS COMING OUT OF HIS MOUTH.. GOD FORBID HE SHOULD WIN THE NOMINATION !!

        • Jaclyn Barnes

          Bev,Amen to that!If Ron Paul is so right on the money,also so right for America!Why then all the years that he’s been,in Congress!Has only one of his bills been passed!He’s an old fool he’d set America further back then Obama,already has!I’m a Jew and not for Obama,but also not for Ron Paul!

          • http://www.azmusic.ca Abe Zacharias

            Then who are you for? Romney?

          • RonW

            Nobody cares about whether you are a Jew, a catholic, a christian, a muslim, or Buddist, The only thing that is important at this point in time is. Are you an AMERICAN? Or are you a GLOBALIST? Response to commenters that are Trolls that just have nothing better to do than call Doc Paul names or repeat distortions of his beliefs etc. For all of those here who either haven’t taken the time to do any serious validating of the information you so glibly are letting ooze from your mouths. Especially where Congressman Paul is concerned. Or you are bought and paid for trolls doing the bidding of the very people that are stealing your children’s future. Or just believe in the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT idealistic notion that it just might work. After all History shows us that the way humanity has conducted itself the last 140 thousand years. Does not work. So what the heck. Why not give it a try. Really what have we got to loose?

            The answer to that my friend can be found by looking at the foundation this wonderful new creation sit’s on. And how it has been fostered on the world. If you believe that anything born and designed out of deception, fraud, extortion, mass murder and genocide. Which speaks directly to the mindset of those that will wind up in the end that, gets to tell your children what they get to be when they grow up. Can turn out to be a good thing. You have my sincere sympathy’s. On the other hand. If you believe the NWO is a some kind of fantasy and unreal. And only tin hats believe is real. Please go back to your xbox or nintendo. And be afraid. Very afraid!. If your not willing to even look at what is in your face to see. At least get out of the way and don’t add to the hurdles that the people who are trying to save America must overcome, by sitting in these comment boxes spreading unfounded lies and distortions of fact.

            Of course then again. Maybe you do these things because you are in fact, one of our elected house members that has gone over to the dark, because you lacked the needed charactor to be able to resist the apple the devil’s over at the FED and FRIEND’S offered you. You probably caved in as soon as they told you that, TREASON? No worries mate. We own this planet and we control who knows and does what. Now do as your told and get back over to the house and start drafting up that bill to place more restrictions on Oil Drillers so supply’s can come down while production costs go up. So we can make billions on well timed stock market moves. Oh and by the way. While your at it. Write a bill that sets you and our other friendly legislator’s above and outside the restrictions and penilty’s that the rule of law the people are required to live by. What’s that mate? Go for it. sure you can then reap the rewards INSIDER TRADING provides. Which by the way people, a handful of our legislators are running around in a panic as we speak doing damage control because this information made it’s way into the public eye’s.

            Ron Paul and by default his family, friends , and supporters care about saving AMERICA. Not The Corrupt, abomination passing itself off as America known as THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AND ASSOCIATES that used every form of treachery on earth. To take over and OWN! The US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT in 1913. That’s the readers Digest Version. Now if you think that to be a tin hat statement I dare you to take off your blinders and spend three hours researching it. If your not willing to investigate the truthfulness of the facts you so freely spew out. For the sake of anybody you care about and their futures. Go back to watching, “I’m not the baby’s daddy” or whatever has had your attention for the past couple of decades. What is going on right now is not trivial. This coming election cycle is probably the most important one in our nations history. And possibly its last. Here I’ll give you a starting point. In the Youtube search box. type Nigel Farange. There are many. He is an EU official that has been fighting for his country too. If you want to see what the NWO is really all about and what they think about the people and country’s they now control. Watch at least four or five of NIGEL FARANGES address’s to the EU council. Those of you that are here getting paid to spread and demean Ron Paul. Go Look In The Mirror. If you can stand the pain.

          • Mad Mike

            Why? Because the majority is aganst his ideasbecause they have either been bought, or they have fallen into this trap of agreeing with the liberals just to get the bills passed. Ron Paul is the only canadate that has backbone and won’t back down from a constitution based, liberty based way of life. If any other candidate gets elected with maybe the exception of Santorum, this country will have its currency, it’s government and it’s people controlled by a one world govornment in the very near future!!!! You can bank on it!! Just read the bible, it says the same thing. All of the prophecies are coming true right before our eyes. Wake up people!!!!!

          • csh

            You guys attacking Ron Paul keep coming up with this ridiculous reason for not supporting him….. You say because he hasn’t gotten bills passed that we should not support him. So you would rather support a guy who gets a bill passed, even if its unconstitutional and infringes on the rights of the people????? You have to be kidding me. The point is in seeing what “position” he is taking…. Ron Paul’s position is that of supporting the Constitution and the people. Now we need to support him.

            Are you aware that he is the only one who had guts enough to make a bill to “Audit the Fed”???? He did get the signatures to finally get it passed in Congress, but it did did get held up in the democratic Senate. However, he shows the guts and stamina to persevere for the good of the people, and that is what we need….. not a bunch of sell out RINOS who will just vote to what they think might be popular with the money makers and special interest groups.
            The point is that now we are in a position to continue the momentum of voting in Constitutionalists at all levels of government who will support each other in our work at refocusing our government back to BY, OF, and For the People as our founding documents recognize.
            So, we need to get a president in there who has a proven track record of taking that stand, so that when our other legislators make effort to correct unconstitutional legislation, it will be upheld by the executive branch.

            Leadership is shown in the effort he makes and the stands he takes. He is for the People. The RINOs in office who did not support his constitutional efforts just show that they are not concerned about the constitution or the people. “THEY” are the ones we need to concentrate on replacing.

            Support the guy who supports the people.
            Support Ron Paul.

          • Neb

            Be that way! Those Jews that failed to see what was happening back in the 1930s saw the gas chambers! When they come to take you away like they did back then don’t cry to us for help!

        • RJ

          On a national level Ron Paul is unelectable. Personally, I think he’s a Loon. If the GOP selection process hands us another candidate that does not have a chance of winning the national election as they did with John McCaine, I think it’s time to do away with the current selection process and develop one where all the voters decide and not just a select few from each state. If Paul is the GOP’s candidate, then we have just handed four more years to Obama and his Czars. If that’s the case, just cancel the election and save all that money, time and anguish. I don’t know what the solution is, but I do know that Ron Paul will never be elected POTUS.

          • RonW

            Ron Paul will win. Whether the RNC runs him or not. By Nov. We American’s, Who will not accept anything else. Will have made Ron Paul’s name and belief’s as well known as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln or Daniel Webster’s. And that you can take to the bank with you. But wait until after the election, because the Federal Reserve Bank is going DOWN.

          • RonW

            Ron Paul will win. Whether the RNC runs him or not. By Nov. We American’s, Who will not accept anything else. Will have made Ron Paul’s name and belief’s as well known as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln or Daniel Webster’s. And that you can take to the bank with you. But wait until after the election, because the Federal Reserve Bank is going DOWN.

          • RonW

            Sorry about double post. mouse problems. Batterys.:(

          • Radman

            Ron, once was more than enough. If you’re really so absolutely sure that Dr. Paul can win, with or without winning the Republican nomination, I’m sure that you can find a local or a Vegas bookie who would be more than willing to take your bet…and your money after the election.

          • csh

            Ron Paul Is VERY electable. He gets more support from the veterans than all other candidates put together, more support from all ages, and all parties than the others. His support comes from the people themselves and not big corporate money and special interest groups.
            He is the best to take on Obama because he has the most to offer as an option to what we have experienced in the the socialistic slide with RINOs joining forces with the Obamaites.

            If anyone other than Ron Paul ends up being the GOP candidate, we are fried.

            It won’t even make any difference. Look at the unconstitutional bills the RINOs have passed that has been an infringement on our rights. If another RINO is set to run against Obama , The GOP will have just given it all away.

            VOTE RON PAUL!

          • Pepper

            At least you said “personally, I think” which is better than 99% of the anti-Paul people on here which regurgitate establishment talking points as gospel.

          • Mark

            RJ, please don’t insult loons. Those birds are innocent! There are many other words to describe Ron Paul . . . lunatic comes to mind . . . .

          • Neb

            Now don’t you take the cake! Just vote for who ever the hell you want, keep your mouth shut about other peoples choice and after the election we Ron Paul people will be bitch slapping ya all the way to the inauguration!

        • Tom

          ok

        • Mervin

          I agree with you, Bev. Except for his economic ideas, he is a dud. Those who would support him are more lunatic than those who supported Obama in 2008. I dislike living in the world that Obama has created. I do not think I could stand to live in the world Ron Paul would create. He not Mitt will ever get my vote.

          • Neb

            You must have a anal fixation cause you show us that you have your head so far up your ass you don’t even see a crack of light around that sphincter muscle!

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            MERVIN, CAN’T YOU TELL THESE SO CALLED PEOPLE THAT ARE FOR PAUL ARE DEMOCRATS IN DISGUISE…. THESE SAME PEOPLE THAT CRITICIZE OUR VIEWS ,ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT PUT OBAMA IN OFFICE….WHAT MORE CAN YOU EXPECT FROM THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS.. THEY WILL GO TO GREAT LENGTHS TO GET OBAMA IN OFFICE AGAIN…ANOTHER 4 YEARS WILL NEVER HAPPEN…HAVE A GREAT DAY !

        • Henry

          You wanna be shoot at? go to Detroit and start shouting racist remarks. Don`t need to thank me

        • Lori

          On what do you base your opinion? It is so easy to go around calling him all kinds of things and have not one thing to back it up, except someone else said it. I challenge you to really look into and understand Ron Paul. I dont agree with everything but that is the case for any candidate.

          • Mark

            I’ve looked into Ron Paul. And did so in 2008. He is nothing like his publicity team portrays him to be. Take time to check his voting record in Congress. When he’s not absent, he often votes with the Democrats.

          • Neb

            Mark, you are a liar!

        • Orrie

          I guess you want more of the same of what Obama is giving you, Bev. ………..SLAVERY!

        • Joan

          I agree Bev. What happen to we conservartives vote the best person for the job no matter who gets the bid!!! I didn’t have Ron Paul in mind!!!! Now it looks like Obama will get re-elected
          with all the crap the GOP is doing to each other!! What a bunch of sorry ass fool’s we have running!! God help us!!!!

        • csh

          You’re a fool….. so shoot your self if you want shot.

        • Nannyroo

          I’m with Bev….she is right on.

        • csh

          Bev, if you want shot…. do it yourself.

        • Mark

          Agreed! Anyone that knows the true Ron Paul knows he is just as bad as Obama. The problem is that the liberal media wants him to get the nomination and therefore doesn’t put out the full story about him. For example, why won’t the liberal media tell the story about how he (a FEDERAL politician) was opposed to Texas legislation making it more difficutl for illegal aliens to get a license (a STATE, NOT FEDERAL, issue).

          What about all the Facebook pages by Democrats encouragin other Democrats to vote for Ron Paul in the GOP primary? Why do the Democrats want him to get the nomination? Because they know he cannot beat Obama and, if by some strange surprise he does, they still have a liberal in the Whitehouse.

          I live near Ron Paul’s district and see him for what he really is, not what his publicity team wants you to believe he is.

          • Neb

            Mark! You are still lying! You are no different than Obama! Maybe that tail I see hanging out your back side is your true donkey tail or you just filled your pants full!

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            MARK, I AGREE… NEWT FOR PRESIDENT !! GO NEWT …..THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT NEWT TO BE NOMINATED BECAUSE THEY KNOW HE WILL BRING OBAMA DOWN ON ANY DEBATE THEY HAVE PLUS THE PRESIDENCY…RON PAUL WILL NEVER MAKE THE NOMINATION AS WE AMERICANS ARE SMARTER THEN THAT… HE SHOULD GIVE UP RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT AS HE ALWAYS LOSES’ !!

        • http://www.lockstockbarrell.com Lou

          guess I have to run with Bev on this. Ron Paul is a fool and I don’t trust him. No, I don’t like Obuma at all and I have learned to think critically and Ron Paul fails the test.
          Lou

        • John

          Obama’s not a fool? Romney’s not a tool? You better go back to reality school! Choose a man who wants to balance a budget. 29% of Americans vote. 60 % will be receiving some sort of government aid within 5 years. 20 % of people pay taxes. You tell me how this is sustainable. FOOOL!

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            JOHN, WOW AN OBAMA LOVER…ONE OF THOSE THAT CAME FORWARD THAT IS A DEMOCRAT & PROBABLY PUT OBAMA IN OFFICE…THE AMERICANS ARE SUFFERING BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPIDITY, THANKS FOR NOTHING !!

        • Robert Stone

          he is no fool that gives his life for others and risks all. the fool is the one who doesn’t

        • William

          Dear Bev,

          Would you please be so kind as to post for the other readers and myself, the reason(s) you feel Ron Paul is a fool?

          • http://none Robert Stone

            I am so sorry for calling Ron Paul a fool. I will vote for him. It’s just that, I came from a family that talks like this.

          • paperpushermj

            I don’t think of him so much a Fool, more just Wrong on a whole list of Issues.

        • Mark

          Ditto, Bev!

        • http://msn.com Tim K

          well were are you?

        • http://deleted cmh391

          So Bev and Millicent and a host of others agree that our 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendments rights are nonsense and want indefinite detention for no other reason than the CIC said so. They endorse the taking over of the internet with the SOPA bill. And I’m sure that they would endorse the proposed Enemy Expatriation Act which would have our soldiers lose their citizenship upon returning home from active duty, or for anyone who opposed the current president’s policies.
          America is a very scary place with people like Bev and Millicent living in it.

        • charlie adams

          Okay ,whos the foit would behoove you to check some facts.ol maybe

          • Sirwizard

            CHARLIE ADAMS…Que?

        • StrokerMcgurk

          You’re right Bev. The man is crazy. Period. But, the majority of the population in this once great country is crazy.

        • Sirwizard

          I agree BEV, Ron Paul is wrong on quite a few things. But, you know…so are the other candidates. Do we have a really good candidate? No, we don’t. Will I vote for Mr. Obama? Not even at the point of a gun (and it could come to that). Would I vote for Ron Paul? If he’s the candidate, yes. In fact, I would vote for Ron Paul’s Hamster before I’d vote for the Commissar in Chief. Ron Paul wants to return to a gold standard and that sounds great, but in fact, there isn’t enough gold on the planet to cover the world’s currency. Is that a reason not to vote for Ron Paul? No. Could we live with his foreign policy? Yes. We’d have to respond to things differently. Can we stand a nuclear attack from Iran? Yes, but only at great cost in lives and materiel. Could we respond? Yes. We could create a large glass sheet in the sand that used to be Iran. I’d prefer to hit first, but Ron Paul still beats the crap out of Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama’s chief qualification is being a Star Wars fan…He married the Wookie.

          • http://none FAT Sue.

            Yes we do. Ron Paul is our candidate. VOTE for Paul.

        • http://none BIG Willy.

          Ron Paul is the man. Vote for Ron Paul. Please.

        • RonW

          Bev. Your not Ben Bernanke Are You? A tatement like that will only get you this. The RNC has an empty tool chest. No stallion in the stable. Nothing in the study but a malware infected pc. The laundry room needs activity. The powder room filled with pretty faces getting ready for the next debate. A broom closet with open door, and a living room with an energetic old man cleaning up the remnants of a shattered wall hanging picture frame, and removing the glass shards from a copy of our US Constitution.

          And yet. Most of you sit and talk about the wannabees that the RNC and their media lapdogs want you to talk about.

          This is for John and Bobby Kennedy May they rest in peace.

          For those that really care about America and interested in taking her back from the scoundrels that stole her and our self esteem 98 years ago in 1913 All of America’s serious currant and past problems begins on 12-23-913 when the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT was made law. America’s problems will continue until the moment that TREASON is abolished.

          The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. which is a privately owned and operated bank. That a cartel of International bankers, old money investors, and their front men such as J.P.MORGAN in concert with others. Using deception, guile, extortion, blackmail and even murder. Forced upon We The People, without our knowledge and consent. The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK. Name chosen with intent to “mislead”. Creates “illusion” of governmental association.

          Also in 1913, they gave us while in a state of peacetime, unconstitutional Federal Income tax. which also gave birth to the I.R.S. Our constitution does allow for tax on citizens not profiting from doing business with The US Govt, but only in times of war. To fund an Army. And orders Termination at wars end. How was this allowed to happen?

          The same criminals then in 1931 had perfected into law a bill that made them legally bullet proof.
          The same crooks in 1933 got a bill passed that authorized total operational secrecy.

          The same group of Thugs then persuaded a sitting President into issuing a EXECUTIVE ORDER that made The keeping of Gold Bullion and Coins legally owned by Constitutionally protected American citizens to be illegal and all must be traded in to the Federal Reserve Bank. For pieces of paper called FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

          End of 2011 Congressman Ron Paul gets a bill perfected and forces them to provide ledger’s regarding Bail out money distribution. ( 9 trillion unaccounted for)

          For the RNC to mull over. We are fed up with the “Anybody but Obama mantra. Old tactic. non starter. Listen up! We Paulites will NOT! transfer our votes to ANYBODY!. We have chosen our CHAMPION. Doc Paul has no say. We will write him in. Why you ask? Because one. your dirty. or two, your are cowards. or three, you just can’t find a Stallion that is clean, has guts, and will make ending the FED. MISSION NUMBER ONE. Just nobody home.

          Not one with the guts and intention of fixing the root cause of America’s problem. To make
          Matters worse. Everybody in Washington knows EXACTLY what that problem is. Kind of hard to take out the trash. If you are the trash. Also kind of hard to take out the trash if you fear the trash can.

          NOT THIS TIME!
          WE CHOOSE RON PAUL
          ITS DOC PAUL ALL THE WAY TO NOVEMBER
          YOUR CALL?

          As we speak. Some politicians in DC are wishing they had brought more depends with them. Scampering about doing damage control and trying to get a bill rushed thru to hide the one that has been so good for some of them. You know. The one that gives legislators legal shelter from INSIDER TRADER charges.

          Lets talk PATRIOT ACT.= Workaround Constitutional protections. ACT OF WAR upon and against the constitution our Country and we the people that it defends.

          Lets talk NDAA The same. Both leave in place the document that is America/s foundation.
          No Constitution.= No Legislature. = No USA
          HOLDER? FBI? LOYAL GENERAL? DC METER MAID? ANYBODY?

          As junior said. ” YOU ARE EITHER WITH US.. OR YOU ARE WITH THEM.

        • sc

          well i guess you must be the classic blond, even though i was never a supporter of R.P. he is the only one left that is concerned about getting this county back to the constitution the rest all seem to think that it is just an old piece of paper to wipe your feet, {or maybe a little higher on}

        • RonW

          Let me tell you about that old fool bev and all the rest of you as well. We don’t shoot potential Patriot’s We slap them on the face or pour cold water on the in an attempt to wake them up. For all you mothers and female voters that would rather see a pretty face in the WhiteHouse. a few facts to ponder.

          Doc Paul has brought over four thousand wonderous new lives into this world. Most people have not put it together yet. That is in fact one of his secret weapons. That’s a pretty big extended family if you ask me. I was in the room and helped bring my son into the world. When I noticed his eyes following voices around the room I switched off the lights and BLING. Eyes open and that moments was like no other in my life. To see that wonder and awe in his eyes. Imagine getting to do that 3 or 4 thousand times in your life.

          First let me explain why Ron Paul supporters will not vote for anyone other than Ron Paul in 2012. There are none among any of the, want to be Presidents. With enough backbone, or even the desire. To step up and do what is the ONLY thing that will save, America, and possibly the world at large. Allowing anyone to believe that we Paulites will throw away Doc Paul’s hard work, dedication to cause and principle is a non starter. What doc Paul wants or says does not matter. ABO does not fly. this election cycle. The RNC Can forget the notion that they can shove somebody else at us thing we will just xave in and go along with their business as usual crap. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.!

          The People that believe they are in charge of what your opinions and choices get to be. Have found themselves in uncharted water. Since control of America and most of the rest of the world has gone unchallenged for so long. What has been, will continue to be. Is a BIG FAIL on their part.

          What we do American’s do in this election cycle. Has unlimited possibility’s and will in one way or another. Effect every living entity on this planet. Ron Paul is the only person since John and Bobby Kennedy, With the heart,courage, and willingness to take on the the OWNERS of the FED and OUT OF sight ASSOCIATED FAMILIA. And that places him right in the crosshairs.

          Ending the FED, and all the laws that are associated with it.Including the ones enacted in 1931-1933. Authored By guess who? For the sole purpose of providing the banksters with a legal firewall, and increase the level of contol over our US government they already enjoyed.The second bill gave them Full authoriyu to operate in 100 complete secrecy. No questions allowed. Who do I give my first born to. to get a job like that?

          The Redears Digest Version. Hey America. We can now steal even more of your wealth, self esteem, and add to your feelings of helplessness and despair. and you can’t stop us. HOW YA LIKE THEM APPLES?. Which is why those that pay attention may remember, Both Greenspan and Bernanke, when asked by Congress for certain data. In essence their response was. UP YOURS!

          So maybe you might now be getting the idea why a vote for anyone the RNC rolls out. Will not fly. Ron Paul with a big enough mandate, covered with our body’s for protection. Is the only one that will give us a chance take back our country and our children’s shot at the American dream. How long has it been since you heard anyone in our nations capitol city, or even anywhere in the US for that matter. hold up a sign or shout. “UNITED WE STAND! DIVIDED WE FALL” How Long?

          Doc Paul can not do it alone. But he will do it, one way or another. If he has to. And frankly. I don’t care. And right now, neither should you. What side of our two party system you find to your liking. We as Americans must come together behind Doc Paul and Give him backup. This is not one of your business as usual, election. Or is it some kind of game. This election is about all of our futures.

          Why does it take a 78 year old man, who could be home doing what he enjoys, Bringing new life into the world to lead the charge? Ending the FED is not a curse. It is A blessing. Had the evil ones that gave us THE FED failed back in 1913. Or had then been discovered by the people. They would have been hanged by the neck until dead for for TREASON. And we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

          Our Congress that is accountable to, We The People. Would have been way too busy doing the job we pay them to do. Managing our money properly. To be off creating legislation designed to strip away the protections our CONSTITUTION provides. Those very same protections are what make our public servants. Accountable to “We The People”

          Ron Paul will place the managing, minting and setting the value there of, We The Peoples money. Back in congresses job description. Where it belongs, and should have always been. That single act will get America off life support.

          There have been a few brave Patriots that Said enough to the insanity and Robbery of America in our past. The ones that did Charge fearlessly Straight at the Fire Breathing Dragon, were either, INTIMIDATED, FRAMED and BLACKMAILED, or MURDERED.

          We are telling all you sleepers out there that. You can choose to believe that this is a normal election cycle. Where any of the issues that get revisited every four years matter. They DON”T. They are back burner items. If you people can’t come to terms with the fact that this is NOT Kansas,and no.You can’t click your heals together to get there. This will most likely be your last election using the voting booth.

          Attempts at treating the Patient’s SYMPTOMS, Is a waste precious time, Which by the way, as we speak, is running out. The very people that fear Congressman RON Paul’s message the most. Have now given us all a Deju Vu moment.

          By parking a US AirCraft Carrier on Irans front Porch. They have now duplicated step one of The TonKin Bay Incident that took us to war with Vietnam.They are trying to provoke Iran into doing something stupid. Knowing full well that. Even if they can not provoke a response from IRANS elite. Some stupid wingnut gihadist standing on the Beach with a BB gun might. If that don’t work, An excuse will have to be made up. Result? More death destruction and shame we peace loving, kind hearted every day and American’s will have to carry around and face in our mirrors. After all. We The People are responsible. We took a long nap. Maybe its a good time to check our water supplys.

          PLEASE WAKE UP PEOPLE! And while your at it. Wake up everyone around you that refuses
          to believe what their own eyes show them. There are time sensitive programs already set in motion, that if not stopped. Have consequences that nightmares are made of. That is the madness created by the OWNERS of the FED and FRIENDS, That gave you the PATRIOT ACT. Which is a direct ACT OF WAR upon and against OUR CONSTITUTION! COUNTRY, and by default. YOU AND ME.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            RON, YOU SHOULD STOP WRITING A BOOK ABOUT YOUR VIEWS & COMMENTS…WE JUST ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOUR LIES & SCARE TACTICS…. YOU LIBERALS MUST BE SCARED TO DEATH OF THIS ELECTION , BECAUSE YOU HAVE DONE IT AGAIN, PROMOTING PAUL LIKE YOU DID WHEN OBAMA WAS RUNNING..NO THANKS, OUR MAN WILL BEAT OBAMA & PAUL…THE ONLY REASON YOU & YOUR DEM BUDDIES ARE “TRYING” TO PROMOTE PAUL IS BECAUSE YOU KNOW OBAMA WILL BEAT HIM TO A PULP !! IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN ! GOD BLESS AMERICA !

        • GQ4U

          Wouldn’t waste the bullet!
          Besides, where do you shoot someone who doesn’t have a brain?

        • linda miskolci

          With a doctorate degree in medicine. What do you have a degree in?
          I intend to vote for Dr. paul.
          Some here complain they will have to take care of their old parents and grandparents. That is how we used to do it before the gov’t took over. Nursing homes are an abomintaion.
          I am hopeful we win the gov’t back from the fascist obama and his thugs. I think more fear Dr. Paul because he will insist you take responsibility for yourselves.

        • Kevin

          Bev is right, Paul is naive when it comes to world affairs believing we can appease dictators (like Chamberlain tried with Hitler) and hide behind oceans. This article, like all I read about Paul and including what his supporters claim say Ron Paul is being lied about, yet his speeches say the facts ARE being covered. Paul is for withdrawing from the world. Too bad he doesn’t realize the world isn’t going to stop turning because he is Pres.!

        • maurice king

          IS THE WHOLE OF THE U.S. SO HOOKED ON SPORTS SO
          THAT THEY NO LONGER HAVE COMMON SENCE ?CONGRESS HAS THE POWER TO HIM-PEACH THE PRESIDENT (RICHARD NIXON) AND HAS DONE NOTHING.
          B.O. BAMMER STILL NOT US CITIZEN.[BUT IS OUR ENEMY
          AS A MOOSAM] HE WANTS TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE
          NATION OF ISLAM IN WASHINGTON D.C. IF YOU WANT
          TO LOOSE A LL YOUR FREEDOMS JUST PUT BO IN POWER.
          HOW MANY US CITIZENS HAVE TO DIE BEFORE YOU REMOVE YOU HEAD FROM YOUR BUTT??? ???****

        • Toni

          You are right!! His foreign policy is naive and stupid.

        • William

          OK! Where do you live?

        • paperpushermj

          He is the Piped Piper of the Fools

        • Roland

          you are so correct

        • Maynard Merrell

          Bev: Got a gun you can loan me for about one miniute?

      • Sue

        I am starting to come around myself. I thought that Ron Paul was great on the economy and a nutcase on everything else. However, now that I am really listening to what Paul has been saying – in his own words – and not listening to the spin that the media puts on his words, I am really liking what he has to say!

        Many of the things I THOUGHT he said, or was TOLD he said was either taken out of context (like the whole helping Israel or not thing) and the whole war issue. He’s certainly not a nut like everyone makes him out to be.

        • Jim Agans

          Sue, you have just hit the nail on the head. You have to Listen to what Dr. Paul says, not what the news media says about him. Please, Please, Please do not be guided by fear. The powers that be have been using fear since WW2 to fund the Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower Warned us about. For us to be afraid of Iran is simply irrational. We can crush them like the bug that they are, and they know it. What we have to fear, or should I say eliminate is a government that could care less about the wants and needs of its people. Thats what we have had for the last 50 years.

          • Sheila

            To Jim: That’s just my point. You have to really listsen over and over to what Ron Paul says in order to understand exactly what he is trying to say. He’s clear as mush. That simply won’t work for the President of the US. He’s got to say what he means and mean what he says. He has to be more specific.

          • Neb

            Besides Iran will not close the straights, because it would be shooting themselves in the foot. Their economy will crumble if they start some crap!

          • RonW

            Jim they are not bugs. They are a very old and smart civilization. The people of Iran are not suicidal. I’ll tell you something. If I was an Iranian big shot. I’d dig a deep below the surface deep enough and big enough hole to fill with enough explosives to cause a 5 point hit on the worlds shaker scales. Then be jumping up and down telling the world that I had hundreds of more nukes just like it. Why you ask? Well lets count the reasons. One just about every country Iran shares a border with has OIL and also has been turned to rubble. Iran has OIL and saw what Bush Seniors search for weapons of mass distraction did in Iraq. Iran a country that has a valid beef with Israel over the way they see their Arab brothers and sisters being treated and the underhanded way the ZIONISTS got control of Palestine in the first place in 1948. Iran a Country that had to sit by and watch as the US nuked up Israel. The same Iran that has had the US remove an elected popular leader. And stuff the SHAH OR IRAN up their behinds. Who treated his people brutally for over a decade. Do they want a nuke? You can bet on it. Would they use it You Betcha. But not as a first strike weapon. They are not suicidal. They are a sovereign nation like the US is and want to remain that way. They also know that Israel has enough nuked up submarines to make the entire middle east glow in the dark. NUFF SAID ON FEAR CAMPAIGN!

          • PatG

            I HAVE been listening to what Ron Paul says. That’s why I don’t want him. The only thing we agree on is that the economy is a mess, but he has no idea how to fix it. (Gingrich has already proven he does.) I don’t agree with his approach to anything else. He has his own opinion of the Constitution, and it doesn’t fit with what the Founders said and did. Not even on foreign policy.

        • Richard

          He’s about the Constitution, freedom and responsible government. What’s wrong with that. His philosophy is exactly the way this country should have been implementing for the last 100 years, but we got off the track and have been gravitating toward socialism ever since.

          There are those here who say he is too old. With age comes wisdom. I have also heard that some think he doesn’t look presidential enough. To those I say if your key determinant for our president is his looks, then please stay home on election day and watch the latest mind numbing TV show.

          • Susie Liberty

            I’ve always believed that We Americans had far more in common than our differences…and much to lose – Our Republic, actually.

            And I wear a Shirt when I’m out and about; text reads: RECLAIMING **Our Constitution **Our Liberties **Our Sovereignty **The Rule of Law

            Doesn’t matter where I am…can be at the Hardware Store or a Doc’s office, it inevitably leads to a good discussion, and at the very least a thumbs-up or a positive comment from a passer-by. All ages; apparently all ‘walks of life’…Americans.

            And this garment represents the Candidate whom I support. Corporate Entities tell me I’m wrong…and for whom I should vote; apparently they don’t like the fact that this man is Not for Sale, and therefore, business as usual in Washington might change. (And Corporate? In my opinion…includes GOP Corporate.)

            I can visit with folks and understand their talking points until it comes to supporting the USA pushing for WW III or the Globalist take-over of Our Beloved America – and then, there simply IS NO ‘compromise’. I will FIGHT with all that is in me against such horrors.

            And then I come to my computer for a ‘reality check’. Duh – I never expect the viscious comments toward me or others who support this Candidate. Makes me wonder if I should rethink my “we have more in common than our differences” notion.

            I’ve done my homework…my research, reading, listening, and viewing. And all I ask that you do that as well with an open mind, if you have not. I once was a little girl, but I’m becoming ‘olden’ somehow…and so, my fears related to our future are for my children and grandchildren…and maybe, for you.

            In the meantime, I WILL continue to wear my shirt with pride: RECLAIMING AMERICA RON PAUL 2012

          • Ed Johnson

            I completely agree with Richard as with age comes wisdom.
            There are tremendous supplements available today to protect the brain & body overall. Obviously, he must be in good health to be running in this race. People are living longer & will continue to do so. Forget what he looks like & listen to what he says – the American people need a substantial change in leadership at the top & fresh policies other than socialism.

          • RonW

            Bad answer Richard. People need to throw a brick thru their mind numbing TV screens. And get out on the net or talk to their friends and co workers and dig for the truth. Simple fact is. Whenever Doc Paul get positive results. The trolls come out in force. Like the S. Carolina high power endorsement announced yesterday. I viewed Glenn Beck’s Hit piece yesterday on youtube. What a sad piece work he has turned out to be. Rob Paul has not even decided who will be his running mate. And Beck has him all painted up with Barny Frank and George Soros. Paaaleeeez give me break. Not a single source fact just Beck doing his new employer’s bidding. Beck is another that will sell his soul it appears to the highest bidder.

          • csh

            Amen Richard.

          • American Patriot

            RonW,
            I quit Becks site when they started removing the facts and posting just the lies.

        • don

          sue you are right i bet not one of these na sayers have heard him speak. all second hand hear say.an that not going to get us where we need to be.old you say what has age got to do with saving our freedom an way of life that we love? TELL ME

          • Wayne

            Ronald Reagan was not a young man either. I believe that Ron Paul is in good health or he would not want to take on the job as president. I am sure that he is not taking on this job for the money. I do not know why anyone would want to be President now because of the shape this country is in now.

          • RonW

            Don.
            They have heard him speak. That is why they are left with nothing but the dumb recantations of regurgitated crap that they get from their double speaking bobble headed media spin masters. They face one of two rude awakenings in their very near future. One waking up to an America that went quietly into the night. And they can blame themselves for that. Or two. the knowledge that they were on the wrong side of the fence while they wasted precious time and actually intentionally placed speed bumps in front of us Americans that are fighting to recover our America. Not that impostor that is currently calling itself the US. The only thing one can say we are UNITED on is the notion that we are DIVIDED. Why? Who does that benefit? Its not rocket science.

        • Ann in Nebraska

          Sue, I’ve been listening to Dr. Paul speak, too, and I like what he says. He just makes sense. He doesn’t try to double-talk me. I like very much that he’s a little older. He’s been around long enough to have heard and seen enough, that he knows what’s going on. He is most definitely nobody’s fool. I’m throwing my support behind Dr. Paul and I hope a lot of other people quit listening to what “everyone” says about Dr. Paul and actually take the time to listen to him in his own words. The man makes a lot of sense. See you at the polls, Sue!!!! Dr. Paul 2012!!!!

          • tod

            Sue ,Don’t worry about his age, God says Blessed are the Peacemakers,so he will have Gods Blessings! What We have to worry about is the New World Order Killing Him!Dr.Ron Paul 2012 !!!

          • csh

            Amen Ann!

        • Clifford Johnson

          Sue, the “whole war issue”? Really? What he said was said on national tv and was out there for everyone to see and hear. What are you saying? Who are you going to believe me or your lying eyes and ears? ron paul would set in motion the loss of the lives of millions of Americans and the nation of Israel by giving Iran the nuclear option. They would attempt to destroy Israel with this option. They have stated that wiping Israel off the map is one of there goals. They have no concern for their lives as they believe that dying would be an honorable thing and they would become martyrs. The United States would be on their shortlist for annihilation. There is nothing they would rather do than be responsible for the death of tens of millions of our citizens. If you are a ron paul supporter you are an Iranian, radical muslim enabler and you put not only our lives but the lives of our children and grandchildren at grave risk. Only the most naive would believe that Iran would not use the nuclear option if they had it.

          • Mundus Vult Decepi

            You’re a paranoid piece of crap, Cliff.

          • Average Joe

            Now again how many ICBMs dose Iran have ? Oh thats right NONE. So how are they going to drop the bomb on us? Now if they drive one down to Isreal and set it off wich seems to be their plan acording to you. The retalliation strike of 50 or 60 nukes from around the world( exsept NK) would destroy how much of Iran? Oh thats right it would no longer be on the map it would be listed on the globe as the nation of gone.

          • Andy Miller

            You remind me of Pit Bull seeing an ANT and ranting to his friends the ant is going to kill us we must do something so they go see the Elephant, saying the Ant is going to kill us it has a poison in her bite! The Elephant says but her bite cannot go through my hide, but the Pit Bull says she is making a secret weapon in that mound of dirt, so the Elephant says OK I’ll stop her, as he lifts one foot 6 inches and places it on the Ant and the Anthill! After lifting his foot everyone wants to see what secret weapon she had, all they find is more she ants that were taking care of their eggs and the little ones all DEAD, no secret weapons! Everybody goes back home thinking why did that Elephant step on that poor Ant and her babies!

          • Clifford Johnson

            Average Joe, Iran would have nuclear weapons under a ron paul administration–he said so himself! They are on the cusp of getting nuclear weapons and ron paul says that is okay. This is not some media smear campaign–he stated it publicly on numerous occasions during the broadcast public debates. They already have the means to deliver the weapon. They don’t have to “drive one down to Israel”. Are you really that stupid? I’m sorry, I guess you are. The insanity and ignorance of a ron paul supporter cannot be under estimated.

          • Joey

            New to me or any of my family or friends that I am a radical muslim enabler. But I am proud as a Ron Paul supporter to get called names. It hasn’t kept Ron Paul from continuing to speak the truth. Clifford’s thinking is based on selfish fear without understanding or knowledge of the history of our wars.
            Ron Paul is not giving weapons to Iran or any other nation but our government has been doing that for years Clifford. And our government has been sending our men and women over seas for years to serve in unconstitutional undeclared wars to be maimed and killed. Not Ron Paul! I just read that John Bolton ‘sstatement that it is highly unlikely that Iran could produce nuclear weapons any time soon so lets just attack China or another country that might be more likely to have nuclear weapons.
            Reagan understood that is was a strong national defense that protects our country not attacking “selected countries” that we are told could be a threat. How many countries shall we attack? How many men and women should we send to be killed over seas. We are in 150 counties now. How many more trillions would you borrow to fight unconstitutional undeclared wars? We can’t continue in this insane pattern as a nation and survive but NO candidate but Ron Paul speaks that truth or will stop this insanity and work to protect our borders and secure our nation.

          • Paul

            Please people you need to understand that these Conservative sites are monitored and posted on by the radical right wing nut jobs. There are many Repubs that just spend their day putting up posts on Conservative sites that may make it seem like Ron Paul’s support is weaker than it is. They want to make Ron Paul look un-electable and like his support is a broad based support when it is indeed broad based. Don’t get too worked up over some of these posts. Just remember that many of the supposed Ron Paul “bashers” are right wing nut jobs trying to stir up sh–!

          • LocalYokel 35

            Islam has practiced taxation and intimidation succesfully for 1350 years on all that have demonstrated fear based in ignorance. Fear of Ron Paul is purely media promoted psychosis.
            http://blip.tv/islamtv/the-third-jihad-1388671
            And just what could have stopped most of Europe, USSR, Pakistan, India, North Korea, and China from getting nukes. As was with the USSR, any real threat of use by any of them may well be the beginning of their end. JFK simply reminded them when delivery was a bit slower.
            Perhaps the incident will serve to clarify Ron Paul’s fearless approach to empty threats of Iranian leaders. Does not their Islamic style of boasting bear a strange resemblance to the rantings of a sitting US president considering that they too are only as effective as real American patriots permit?
            The USS Kidd probably housed enough GPS and tracked moving target programmed missiles to annihilate a greater part of Iran and all their subs in the Arabian Sea in mere minutes. Regardless of media propaganda the cold war did not end with removal of missiles from Cuba. Nor is it likely to end with tyrants existing as mouthy as Khrushchev and USS “Boomers” roaming the seas. The big question today is “how long will TV media continue to slander the only true patriot in obvious reach of being our president with both knowledge and courage to lead the rescue of the US from internal enemies within his constitutional limitations?” All external enemies are already at bay in fear of “dooms day retaliation”. When ICBMs are programmed for effective delivery and can only be stopped by local reset, any act of violence against them must be deemed suicide. What you should fear more is being trapped between government over reach and patriots bearing truth.

          • RonW

            Clifford.. You don’t even see how stupid that fear mongering is. Israel with enough nuked up submarines and land based nukes to make the entire middle east glow in the dark. An Air force that can not be challenged, and a president that has told the US in no uncertain terms to butt out. Israel can take care of itself. Go back and tell Obama you have failed him. You just can’t get around the facts. Then spend some time really thinking about the future you want for your grand children. If an absorbed America that has become the Iron fist of death and destruction for the Global World Socialist Government is your idea of Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Then by all means tell your children to go sign up for the military. But remember this. They will come home in one of two conditions. Mental and or physical basket cases. Like our Vets that are so messed up that all they can do is inhabit our nations freeway off ramps with signs that say will work for food. Or in body bags. If that works for you. Then continue on. If it don’t. Come on over to the our side. We are many. Our numbers grow exponentially, and we are UNITED. And that is what has the corrupt traitors looking for clean underwear to put on.

          • RonW

            Clifford.. You don’t even see how stupid that fear mongering is. Israel with enough nuked up submarines and land based nukes to make the entire middle east glow in the dark. An Air force that can not be challenged, and a president that has told the US in no uncertain terms to butt out. Israel can take care of itself. Go back and tell Obama you have failed him. You just can’t get around the facts. Then spend some time really thinking about the future you want for your grand children. If an absorbed America that has become the Iron fist of death and destruction for the Global World Socialist Government is your idea of Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Then by all means tell your children to go sign up for the military. But remember this. They will come home in one of two conditions. Mental and or physical basket cases. Like our Vets that are so messed up that all they can do is inhabit our nations freeway off ramps with signs that say will work for food. Or in body bags. If that works for you. Then continue on. If it don’t. Come on over to the our side. We are many. Our numbers grow exponentially, and we are UNITED. And that is what has the corrupt traitors looking for clean underwear to put on.

          • William

            Dear Clifford Johnson,

            You stated that Iran will have a nuclear weapon under a Ron Paul administration.

            Do you really believe that want have one under any other administration?

          • Sirwizard

            Well, Clifford, I have heard Mr. I’m-a-Dingy-Job say that Israel and the America (The Big Satan) should be wiped from the map. Not once, but often. He said it at the UN, he said it on TV and he said it over Green Eggs and Ham. I believe him. Silly me. When Hitler said he would kill all the Jews, no one believed him. Why, does anyone suppose, that Iran is working on nuclear weapons? The usual progression of weapons development is to create a first generation weapon with about 15 to 18 KT. That’s a pop-gun by American standards, but still, that is the size of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Is that what people would want? What. You think Iran can’t deliver one? No big bomber? No ICBM? True today, but a High Tech delivery system isn’t the only way. A Toyota Tundra will work fine. Just drive into say…Chicago or Detroit and set it off. Think anyone would be hurt? You’re dead right CLifford. Stick to your guns…BUT, vote for Mr. Paul anyway if he’s the chosen candidate because a mushroom cloud in an American city beats the hell out of a permanent Red Flag flying over Washington, DC. We don’t have great choices this election. Hold your nose and vote for ANYONE BUT OBAMA.

          • http://none STONE HIGH.

            I will give every one that will vote for Ron Paul a $500. GO Ron Paul. GO!

        • Carol Goodwin

          Yes, Sue! This is the only way we are going to win people by getting the truth (the whole truth) out there. All these naysayers are paid to get on line and bad mouth Ron Paul. He has single handedly stood up against so many RINOS, dim-oh-krats along with the media and the establishment and now it is our turn and his turn to make people research and read what he has to say. Everything you really want to know about Ron Paul he pain stakingly explains and not in any political double talk such as most of the ‘well polished’ other candidate wannabes.
          I know how hard headed some people can be who are too busy to go doing research and all we can do is try to condense it so at least they can take the time to understand who and what Dr Paul truly represents. I’m trying to get my hands on at least one of his ‘Super Pamphlets’ so I can have copies made or make them myself from my printer.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            CAROL, AREN’T YOU ONE OF THOSE LIBERALS GETTING PAID OR JUST STUPID ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR A RADICAL LIKE PAUL ? THAT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING. WARNING PEOPLE ABOUT YOU DEMOCRATS IN DISGUISE PROMOTING PAUL… YOU MUST BE A COPY CAT ALSO…WE KNOW YOUR GAME PLAN, SO JUST KEEP PROMOTING BECAUSE IN THE END YOU WILL LOSE… PAUL ALONG WITH OBAMA WILL LOSE…AMEN

        • Mad Mike

          I agree Sue! Thank you. I wish everyone else that is against Ron Paul would do the same thing. People, just listen to Ron and his Ideas, not the mainstream media. The media is brain washing everyone. They are all for the most part liberals, except for a few on Fox. The liberals have an agenda, and believe u me, it’s not in favor of the people, it’s to get people dependant on the govornment and the ones who don’t, will be slaughtered. This will happen in the near future if we don’t stop it NOW!

        • Joan

          Sue, Ya think so!! Paul does have a huge following! Maybe just maybe!! Anyone BUTT Obama!!! I know my spelling is off who cares right?

          • Mark

            If Ron Paul gets the nomination, I will seriously look at a third party candidate. Ron Paul and Obama are too much alike.

        • Mark

          Instead of listening to what Ron Paul SAYS, watch what he DOES. What he says and does are two different things. I trust him just as much as I trust Obama, and I don’t trust Obama with much more than knowing his family members’ names!

          • Willis

            I am with you Mark, but you are talking straight from you rear.

            Ron Paul is the ONLY ONE that does what he says.

            In other words, you don’t know what you are talking about, or you are just trolling.

            And trolling is fine. Its fun too.

          • Mark

            Willis,

            Ron Paul SAYS he is for the states being allowed to rule themselves, BUT:
            (1) He opposed Texas legislation that made it more difficult for illegal aliens to get drivers licenses,
            (2) He opposed Texas legislation that authorized the Texas Deparmtent of Public Safety to use facial recognition techology to identify fugitive felons, and
            (3) he stated on the Tonight Show in Dec 2011 that he wants more regulation on alcohol.

            So, should I expect Ron Paul to stay out of state business like he says he will or should I expect him to continue his meddling in state business, which violates the U.S. Constitution that he claims to know so much about?

            He doesn’t do what he says. He’s a career politician. That’s it.

            Take time to learn about the real Ron Paul, not the imitation his publicity team and the liberal media want you to know about.

          • William

            What actions of Ron Paul’s lead you to believe he is deviant in his intentions and statements?

          • http://none K.K.K.

            You are right Mark. I ask ALL my K.K.K. friends to vote for a white man. Ron Paul.

          • RonW

            mark ..So maybe you could tell me how a US congressman can oppose state legislators at state level? what am I missing here. let me see…hmm nope can’t think of anything except maybe your one of those leaper’s that likes to miss the dots in the middle as you connect the outer ones to draw a different picture than is the case.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            MARK, WE AGREE WITH YOU BUT DO NOT VOTE THIRD PARTY AS THAT WILL BE A VOTE FOR OBAMA & THAT WE DO NOT NEED OR WANT… I WILL VOTE FOR WHOEVER WILL BE NOMINATED …IT WILL NOT BE PAUL AS THE WAY HE OPENS HIS MOUTH WITH NOTHING BUT DANGEROUS BELIEFS, HE WILL LOSE…. GOD BLESS !

        • GQ4U

          The last Ron I voted for was a great President. I think this Ron will do a great job of restoring sanity to government, freedom to Americans and sovereignty to other nations. I Hope you come around. See more of his positions on important issues at Dr Paul’s official site:
          http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

          Caution, when you support Paul you will be verbally assaulted and called names by those still confused by the media.

        • Kevin

          According to this Ron Paul info-merical Paul has NO intent on helping Israel! He said NO foreign aid for anyone, that includes our only friend in the Middle East. Paul is naive & dangerous! Without our help Israel will fall and with it comes being fully held hostage for oil. It will take years to get our own oil fields up to capacity and we have closed so many refineries we will not be able to convert oil to gasoline fast enough. Israel is the lynchpin and we must never turn our back on them. Paul said, not I, NO MORE FOREIGN AID FOR ANYONE! That includes Israel!

      • Mary

        Huffington Post is a liberal newspaper – do you really believe ANYTHING they have to say. Arriana Huffington, Georger Soros, the Clintons, Obama, all best buddies and you would believe anything the H Post puts out? Shame on the Conservative Byte for putting this article forward and not mentioning that this rag is as liberal as it gets!

        • Patriot 101

          I went to Huff Po and read the entire article. This author did a good job on this article. Are you disappointed this wasn’t just another “hit piece” on RON PAUL?
          Even liberal rags sometimes have thoughtful articles that get through! USE YOUR OWN BRAIN! Read the entire article, then decide. You seem to be caught in the middle of the flock (like a sheep to slaughter) to believe the MSM lies, distortions, and deceptive, selective out of context statements put forth by them.
          I was similarly caught until I heard RON PAUL speak. He made perfect sense when he put forth his constitutional policies and ideas (INCLUDING FOREIGN POLICY). When he has the time to explain the constitutional reason for his policy positions, it becomes clear he is right! He won me over at Ames at the Iowa straw poll.

          • Mark

            Patriot, it’s too bad this wasn’t one of those honest articles, but rather a liberal skewing of the truth. The liberals want Ron Paul to get the GOP nomination and will do what they can to get it for him.

          • William

            Mark,

            you posted “The liberals want Ron Paul to get the GOP nomination and will do what they can to get it for him”.

            I guess they too are coming to their senses. Looks like Ron Paul really can unite our country’s political factions.

            Go Ron, Go!!!

          • William

            Mark,

            You posted, “To be honest, I think ConservativeByte (and a few other websites) might be false fronts for the Ron Paul campaign. It wouldn’t be the first time he has pulled that stunt.”

            I’ve been on many of the Conservative Sites for years now. For years I’ve offered links to factual information to discredit false and malicious posting in regards to Ron Paul, his philosophies and his campaign.

            It’s been a long hard fight, Few if any where strongholds for Paul and his policy. At times it felt as if my efforts were in vein. I for one am glad to see the tide has turned and Dr. Paul is receiving his due credit and support.

            If you want to join a blog that still loves to Bash the good Doctor, you should sign up at “The Patriot Update”
            it seems to be the last stronghold for the Paul haters.

            Good luck to you in finding what ever it is you are seeking.

            Either way you are always welcome here, we have faith that if nothing else our conversations may at a minimum offer you a different perspective.

            After all, your concern for our nation still gives you merit as being a Patriot.

          • Kevin

            In Paul’s own words, despite his rhetoric about supporting Israel, he said in this article NO more foreign aid for anyone. Anyone includes every country including Israel. Paul is two-faced like all career politicians. Too bad so many of you are so easily swayed and do not really listen to what Paul says. If you did you would see past the political front he puts up and realize he will cut off Israel and he will try to isolate our country. It failed in the pre-WWII years leaving us vulnerable and it will again!

            He said himself, that is Ron Paul for his brainwashed supporters, that there will be NO MORE FOREIGN AID for anyone. So despite his claims of being for Israel, it is his intention to leave them wide open to invasion while we try to hide behind oceans.

          • SteveinWv

            To Kevin: Ron Paul does support Israel, we just can’t afford giving them handouts anymore, Netanyahu has stated on a number of occasions that they no longer required our funding and that they can stand on their own 2 feet now. Why are you so intent on giving money to countries who want to see us dead, nice strategy there. Ron does want to stop the funding because of something called 15 TRILLION IN DEBT!!!!

        • howzzat

          I agree, Mary. Makes no sense at all. Maybe Conservativebyte and Huffingtonpost are having a secret illicit love affair. Who knows for sure?

          • Mark

            To be honest, I think ConservativeByte (and a few other websites) might be false fronts for the Ron Paul campaign. It wouldn’t be the first time he has pulled that stunt.

          • http://none K.K.K.

            Your mama. howzzat.

        • Bonnie

          Seems to me Joey that Ron Paul was part of Congress that authorized the “Unconstitutional undeclared war” just same as the rest of Congress! Did you ever wonder why America is not mentioned in the Bible? Perhaps because we are wiped off the face of the earth by a nuclear bomb. Didn’t John see a light with a tail in the sky in Revelations? Hmmm! I guess I will write in my vote for my candidate too if he does decide to drop out. As all the Cain supporters are going to do. Maybe everyone will write in there candidates that they want as president even the Jon Huntsman supporters. You know where that will leave us? With Obama! No I am not a liberal. I am a registered republican. I am a conservative. But I see how gung ho RP supporters are and how nasty they are to people who don’t share their views about RP that they do and it turns me off. I would not vote for him because of this. There is not no way and no how after I see how viscous you people are that represent this candidate would I vote for him because if this is how you all are then perhaps it is because this is how he is…

          • Willis

            Bonnie, you got it backwards.

            If you just got on the blogs, welcome to the “FLAME WAR”

            Ron Paul supporters are not the nasty ones. But, we are many. So everywhere you go on the internet. There we are.

            We are many.

            We can throw BO out of office, but you have to hitch the cart to THIS WAGON, because we WILL NOT follow you and the Republican establishment into the abyss.

            Ron Paul 2012

          • Mark

            And, of course, Ron Paul denies any involvement with the viciousness . . . .

            But I do find it interesting that there are such similarites all over the country rather than isolated events. These aren’t orchestrated?

          • Mark

            Willis,

            Ron Paul supporters aren’t the nasty ones?

            They weren’t the ones carrying ROn Paul signs and attacking Rick Santorum and his wife & children as they left a restaurant?

            They aren’t the one’s hacking websites and posting profanity about other candidates while worshipping Ron Paul?

            What you talkin’ ’bout, Willis?

          • Kevin

            Willis, Ron Paul supporters ARE the nasty ones! I have been attacked repeatedly for not understanding what Ron Paul really means. SO what does Paul REALLY mean when he says it is a lie that he doesn’t support Israel then goes on to say he will NOT ALLOW ANY Foreign aid to any country? I’m sure as a Paul supporter you will twist it but it means HE WILL NOT give any foreign aid to any country including Israel! Well, verbal support while we hide back here in the United States is not going to be much good to Israel. Paul is already talking appeasement of dictators like in Iran (just like Chamberlain did with Hitler). I don’t see how appeasing the man claiming he is going to destroy Israel is supporting Israel?!?

            Paul is a two-faced career politician, don’t fall for his “savior” claims! I am a conservative who believes isolationism (and that is what Paul is talking about supporters!) fails every time!

        • RonW

          Mary
          I bailed on HPOST when they sold out to AOL. I have been banned from posting comments on rEUters and the NYTIMES for posting this. As of now, I can only thank conservativebyte for having a format that does not limit words or limit comment sizes. The very tool used to keep American’s stupid. How much real data can anyone believe they can get from our sheeple creating two minute soundbite mentality?

          You tell me. Why would a common sense approach at problem solving be a banned? Bzzz Bzzz I can hear the angry hornets nest unholstering their race card weapons as I type this..

          Israeli Peace Plan.txt

          How many people reading this comment know exactly how Israel gained access to what was before the outset of WWII a conquered Arab sovereign nation state and now a British Crown Colony formally known as Palestine? Research it. Winston Churchill and some quote, Influential unamed people struck a deal. Real estate “Palestine” for American blood, By arranging to drag America into the war against Hitler and thereby save England, already on life support, From Germany’s foot soldiers.

          Time to throw a resolution party. Those that don’t participate forgets any US foreign aid FOREVER. The Guest list. Three people that speak and act for Israel. Three people that speak and act for Palestine. The Format one table six chairs. Three on each side.Two real time streeming Video camera’s. Piped to the net and at least one mainstrem media channel on both sides of that wall they are building in Israel. Begins at 8 am. Lunch one hr. at noon. Ends at 5 Pm. If the matter is not resolved by 5 pm. They begin at 8 the next morning. If it takes a 40 hour work week. So be it. Should either side walk out and discontinue the negotiations. They lose US support forever. Five will get you ten they will be back out on the golf course by noon. I’m fed up with being held hostage by that madness. The US. With its quote “UNWAVERING SUPPORT For our friends in Israel is exactly why this stupidity has gone on this long, and the very root cause of our quote Terrorist boogieman Problems. The plain old everyday citizens on
          both sides of this issue do NOT hate each other in spite of the propaganda slung all around the world by the powers the be in Israel and their spinless lapdogs here in the States. Those People want peace. The wikileaks doc’s pretty well spell out who was willing to give much towards peace. And who wants to be the hard headed jerks actively suppressing the economy of the weaker already on life support side. The resolution Party suggestion is fool proof. By having the negotiations streemed live and in real time. The world will be able to see which side really doesn’t want peace. And because of the fact that the meetings are open to anyone that wants to drop in and watch a bit. Nobody will be able to spin it. Kind of like CSPAN. To bad our state dept. and diplomatic corp. haven’t conducted our,”We THe Peoples” business out in the open all along. Just think how much may have been accomplished. Who knows? Maybe those folks working over at wikileaks might have had to go get day jobs.

          • Christian Patriot

            Ron W. You wrote in your other post above that you will write in Ron Paul on the ballot if he is not on there, rather than vote for any other. If you write in Paul’s name if his name is not on the ballot YOU are the one giving the vote to BO. If a candidates name is not on the ballot DO NOT write in someone else. We have to vote united or divided we WILL fall. We have one chance to get this right or we lose America and our way of life. No matter which republican is voted in it will take more than this next election to correct everything that has been done against this country and constitution. So vote and vote united to first get BO out and then stay awake and working at getting rid of the rest of the progressives and ineligibles who are there now. It will still take a lot of work and time from US, from We The People, to correct the direction of this nation back to the original constitutional republic – no matter which republican is voted in. If we go back to sleep again after this election the same will continue. Maybe at a slowed pace again but it will continue to be destroyed if we go back to sleep after this election.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            I agree Paul is a progressive with conservative fiscal views

          • William

            Welcome aboard! Free thinkers are always welcome here.

          • William

            Christian Patriot,
            Ron W. is not alone. The number of Americans willing to do the same are many, myself included.

            Wrote Ron Paul in in 2008, will do so again if need be in 2012. It’s a matter of principle.

            So many so called Republicans and Conservatives so afraid of another term of Obama that they would willingly cast aside principle and bow down and plead for compromise.

            Compromise brought this nation to the place it is today.

            Now, before it is too late; We must stand on Principle.

            No more sacrifice, no more hoping that if we give in to the powers that be, that we might somehow achieve some sort of change, regardless of how small it could be.

            Our Founding fathers did not bow down to the King of England and say “Please sir, can we have some more”?

            Instead they put everything on the line for the belief in principle. Are you? Are we not the descendants of those colonists that made us Americans?

            I realize that not every man shares the same beliefs. But there is no way that any man with any good number of years behind him, having been born in this country can not see how much we have already lost.

            But surely; now, when so many are willing and eager to take up the cause of restoring liberty: that those who would readily settle for less, can not muster the courage to at least stand in the rears and offer if nothing else the appearance of unity.

            “United we stand, Divided we Fall”

            For those who will not stand to help reclaim and restore our America ,I offer to you the words of Samuel Adams

            “If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” — Samuel Adams

          • Christian Patriot

            William if you write in a name on the ballot that is not one of the legitimate choices then you have no vote. If you don’t vote for the republican that is given us then your vote is lost and is obamas gain. This is common sense. Most of us are patriotic and believe in the constitution. Most of us realize it will take a lot more than just winning the next election to save our country but will only take one more election to lose it all and forever. Use your head and use your vote wisely. AFTER we cast out obama is the time to start working on the next step which is to get people in ALL levels of our government replaced. If you refuse to cast out obama there are no more chances to save our country or the constitution. First obama has to go and should be everyones focus. This is the choice we are given, Get obama out and work toward the restoration of our country and constitution, or be stupid and waste your vote and lose our country with no chance to recover. We will all be slaves under a dictator and will live in a whole different world than any of us are prepared for. One where we will not ever have a vote again, only a dictator. A world that I do not wish to live in or watch my children suffer through and grow up in. There is no honor in that and no saving the constitution if you do that. Don’t be so blind and ignorant. What will happen if you do not use your vote and obama wins the election? How will you save the country and constitution then?

        • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

          MARY, I WAS AMAZED ALSO THAT THE HUFFINGTON RADICALS WERE ON THIS PAGE…WE ALL KNOW WHAT THEIR POST STANDS FOR….ALL THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS…YOU NAMED THEM & YOU ARE RIGHT ON THAT… A BUNCH OF SELF GAIN CROOKS …NOT FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE , OUR COUNTRY, FREEDOM & CONSTITUTION…THAT IS WHY WE MUST VOTE THIS ADMINISTRATION ,REGIME OUT 2012 !

      • http://get-america-back.blogspot.com rocky dune

        Man, and you want to say that you are OK with an old fart being a replacement for Obama? You might be kidded! Global politics is a complicated matter and you have to be well rounded to correctly judge a politician. Ron is betting on politically-uneducated American who is mostly reacting with his emotions but not the brain. Take out all our military bases and face the consequences of taking over by Chinese or Russians who would love to control most of the world. Read more, educate yourself, and then make the right choice.

        • Mark

          Well said, Rocky!

        • William

          How is it that we will be able to continue to control the world when we are no longer able to support ourselves?

          Soon the world will control us; for we owe so many, so much.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            WILLIAM, THAT IS THEIR PLAN, CONTROL AMERICA, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…OBAMA WANTS TO BE THE DICTATOR…PAUL IS A CLOSE SECOND..NO THANKS WE AMERICANS HAVE WISED UP & ARE MAKING SURE WE DO NOT HAVE ANOTHER 08.. SINCE OBAMA HAS BEEN IN OFFICE OUR RATING AS A STRONG , NUMBER ONE COUNTRY HAS FALLEN DOWN TO DOUBLE AA FROM TRIPLE AAA..HOW DO YOU ALL FEEL ABOUT THAT ?? THIS COUNTRY IS HEADING EXACTLY THE WAY THIS ADMINISTRATION WANTS …WITH ANOTHER 4 YEARS IT WILL ACCOMPLISH THAT…GOD HELP US ALL !!

        • http://none K.K.K.

          Screw your self, rocky dump.

      • just sayin

        If Ron Paul is honest, then he is incompetent as a manager in my opinion. Here is the fact. Please don’t blather on about NWO, Neo Cons and the like. Just make your determination which one he is and then temper your future comments using common sense rather than Mantra! His views that were written about in HIS newsletters for years with HIS name on them are scary. He claims that he did not know what they were writing for years. To me, that sounds like irresponsible management AT MINIMUM. How can someone who cannot even supervise his OWN newsletters manage international affairs and the US government. So IF he is honest, he is irresponsible and incompetent AT THE LEAST. My belief is that he DID know what was in his newsletters for YEARS and did supervise what went in there. THAT would make him patently dishonest by claiming that he did not know. What would the average person think if they were not a PaulBot or a cult member? My guess would be the latter but the former is possible. Which do you believe, since you claim he is the ONLY honest one? Is he irresponsible and incompetent or dishonest?

        • BarbC

          I agree that Ron Paul knew what was in the newsletters… if he did not, it would make him very irresponsible. I have watched the debates and I have seen him loose his temper and that scares the stuffing right out of me. All we need is an old man with the start of dementia ruling our country. And don’t accuse me of being liberal, a demo, too young, or any of those things. I am a conservative Republican who is pushing 70 and have been a Republican since day 1 of voting. I just do not think we have a decent slate of Republicans running so our choices are very limited.

          • LocalYokel 35

            Consider that you are being squeezed in one of the many cracks created by both media and political parties using their puny terms of conservative and liberal divided again by a range from far left to far right all to replace the only two that have exact meaning. There is no free space between patriot and traitor. Choose carefully where you stand while holding the destiny of future generations. Otherwise, compose an epilogue for your tombstone explaining your action or inaction to your confused progeny. You may deserve what you get, But they don’t.

          • William

            Has your statement of Ron Paul having “Dementia” been medically diagnosed or are you admittedly posting false information?

            If in fact the has been a diagnosis of Dementia, please share your source.

            If not, then please stick to the facts when posting.

        • Clifford Johnson

          just sayin–he is easily both. For him to say, as you so correctly stated, that he does’nt remember who wrote the papers with HIS NAME on them is just so ridiculous and incredulous. He has instabt recall of details dating to the 1950′s and states them with eloquence but he cannot remember who wrote the papers with HIS NAME on them. The ones that were written just a few short years back. What a nut job this jackass is!

          • Willis

            No; How about not throwing people under the bus for some squalid political gain. That witch hunt is being spearheaded by supporters of the Federal Reserve System i.e. CNN, Hannity, Rush and every other liberal in “conservative” clothing.

            Clifford “Military Industrial Complex” Johnson, we have values that you would never know about, because you are Keynesian fed sycophant.

            WE DON’T TRUST YOUR KIND, Cliff.

          • William

            If in you opinion, one example of a personal error makes a person a “nut job” and a “jackass”, in your opinion what then are the rest of the candidates.

            Also, may we then assume that you, yourself have never erred at anything?

            Or is the pot calling the kettle black?

        • RonW

          It is interesting and no matter how nicely packaged. The end result is always the same. When you have nothing else. Smear. Distort, Over look positive consistent voting record, make sure you don’t mention that the man while being fought tooth and nail by all the RANKING members in both congressional houses when he would bring his bills forward on law maker TERM LIMITS Was also delivering baby’s of ALL races into this world. Does RANKING MEMBERS, TERM LIMITS, and GREED and CORRUPTION strike a cord there ? JUST SAYIN? Oh and not to mention maybe his news letter might have bigoted editor, or other infiltrator in his staff. Its not like Doc Paul had boatloads of surplus time on his hands. How many thousands of cases of embarrassed sitting presidents because of underling staff would you like me to burn up hard drive storage space with?

          • William

            Well done. Very well done.

      • don

        RON PAUL’S FOREIGN POLICY IS A MUSLIM BUTT KISSER! It is a very dangerous attitude, which is the same as our muslim president’s policy.

        • William

          100 plus years ago that same foreign policy led America to be the country everyone one dreamed of, told stories to their children of and led many to leave behind everything they had ever known to come and live in such a wonderful place. Ahhh, America.

          Look what we have done to you. Perhaps we need a history lesson. Let’s go back to when America became “that shining city on the hill”

          “The True Americanism”

          What is the rule of honor to be observed by a power so strongly and so advantageously situated as this Republic is? Of course I do not expect it meekly to pocket real insults if they should be offered to it. But, surely, it should not, as our boyish jingoes wish it to do, swagger about among the nations of the world, with a chip on its shoulder, shaking its fist in everybody’s face. Of course, it should not tamely submit to real encroachments upon its rights. But, surely, it should not, whenever its own notions of right or interest collide with the notions of others, fall into hysterics and act as if it really feared for its own security and its very independence. As a true gentleman, conscious of his strength and his dignity, it should be slow to take offense. In its dealings with other nations it should have scrupulous regard, not only for their rights, but also for their self-respect. With all its latent resources for war, it should be the great peace power of the world. It should never forget what a proud privilege and what an inestimable blessing it is not to need and not to have big armies or navies to support. It should seek to influence mankind, not by heavy artillery, but by good example and wise counsel. It should see its highest glory, not in battles won, but in wars prevented. It should be so invariably just and fair, so trustworthy, so good tempered, so conciliatory, that other nations would instinctively turn to it as their mutual friend and the natural adjuster of their differences, thus making it the greatest preserver of the world’s peace. This is not a mere idealistic fancy. It is the natural position of this great republic among the nations of the earth. It is its noblest vocation, and it will be a glorious day for the United States when the good sense and the self-respect of the American people see in this their “manifest destiny.” It all rests upon peace. Is not this peace with honor? There has, of late, been much loose speech about “Americanism.” Is not this good Americanism? It is surely today the Americanism of those who love their country most. And I fervently hope that it will be and ever remain the Americanism of our children and our children’s children.

          — Carl Schurz, Wikisource-logo.svg “The True Americanism”, address delivered in New York City at a meeting of the Chamber of Commerce of the State of New York, January 2, 1896.

        • American Patriot

          don,
          You sir are a damn lier!!!!
          http://tinyurl.com/4alrqxg
          How many Muslims do you see here?
          How many jews?

      • calypsoman

        Dr Paul’s message is good ; too bad the messenger isn’t quite up to the job as Prez.

        • William

          So sad, so sad. Hard to believe.

          That only candidate willing or capable to carry the most important message for the restoration of America is just some crazy, old, senile fool.

          Doesn’t sound senile or foolish to me?

          Sad to believe that no one else is willing to shoulder his burden.

          So sad to believe that we ever let it go this far.

          If you were dying of thirst in the desert, and some crazy old man came and offered you water, would you reject his offer because you thought him old and foolish?

          Why then would you reject the offer of some foolish old man when he offers to help restore your Liberties?

          I wonder? Who is the real fool?

      • http://none Little Willy.

        GO Paul. Go.

      • JC

        The only real American in the running…
        the only one not selling us out to Globalism…
        Go Ron Paul!

    • http://AOL MIKE C.

      Ron Paul….Geithner’s replacement, he wants to corner and control the fed, how better could he do it if he were to take hold of this position, think about it.

      • rob

        Eleminate and,Control are spelled differently and,mean different things, RON PAUL says to ELEMIMATE!!! PAY ATTENTION!!!

        • Kiki

          Um, speaking of spelling, I would have given you the benefit of the doubt, but you did it twice. It’s “eliminate” not eleminate.

        • http://AOL MIKE C.

          Get a life

          • Paul

            Like YOURS, you lousy, NWO-stooge troll?

          • don

            Get a better candidate!

        • Clifford Johnson

          Rob, what the hell does “ELEMIMATE” mean? I think it means ron paul is a nut job.

          • Ruth

            Are you people talking about
            ELIMINATE (meaning “to remove”)?

          • Pepper

            EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!

          • Willis

            Clifford Johnson aka “Send our troops to die for Pentagon Contractors”

            We DON’T TRUST YOUR KIND, Cliff.

            Ron Paul 2012: It’s about TRUST.

          • William

            Again only words of criticism. Truly saddening.

      • don

        corner the fed. HA mr. liberial he wants to do away with it .think about it yea i have. i to say screw the fed.

    • RPG

      All you Pauliacks must be smoking something — he can’t and won’t even win the republican primary let alone defeat the marxist in the White Hood!

      Also all he will accompish, if he runs as an independant, is to get the guy in the White House now reelected — in that case we are all doomed!

      Get serious — any of the remaining republican candidates are infintely better than the marxist — however Romney will probably get the nomination — get behind him!

      • http://Elly Eleanor

        Romney will only get the nomination if people hold their noses and vote for him. The whole campaign so far has been “anyone but Romney”. Is that the campaign mantra we want going into a fight with Obama? We have had to vote for the “hold your nose and vote for…” candidates for quite a few election cycles, including the last one. What makes you think this one would have a different outcome.

        • Patriot 101

          People are sick of “holding their noses” and voting for the RINO selected for us!
          I predict there will be a third party that CAN WIN FOR THE FIRST TIME!
          Many are done with the “system” as it is, and will rebel against the “establishemnt” should they force McCain (oh, I mean Romney this time) on us!
          Romney has trouble getting 30% of REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR HIM! NO DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR HIM!
          HOW IS THIS MAN POSSIBLY GOING TO BEAT OBAMA?

          • Clifford Johnson

            A third party that can win this time? Really? Is it possible that you could be more stupid? Obamler will lose this time because he has been exposed for the fraud that he is. A bunch of the middle class white voters voted for Obamler the last time to prove that they were not prejudice. They will vote against him this time to prove they are not stupid.

        • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

          ELENOR, WHO WOULD YOU SUGGEST ?? NO PAUL, OBAMA… MY CHOICE WILL BE WHOEVER IS NOMINATED…BUT I WILL VOTE FOR ONE OF TWO PEOPLE…HAVE NOT DECIDED FOR SURE YET … WE MUST GET RID OF THIS ADMINISTRATION & WE CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT A RON PAUL WHO IS A DANGER TO THIS GREAT COUNTRY… NOT ANOTHER OBAMA !

      • Willis

        @RPG No.

      • David Betts

        Mitt is just like obumo just in the GOP stables that is all read his record we’ll have another 4 yrs of the same thing but just with a R in the WH.

        • ANNIE

          only THIS time..we will have to clean up obama’s MESS!!!!!

      • Engie

        RPG has it all…The only time I would support Paul is if he was the Republican candidate vs. BO. But that would mean BO would win. If and when he breaks off to a 3rd party, then BO’s back in the WH. Wake up conservatives….get behind a Republican who CAN beat BO and quit hyping Grandpa Ron….he’s a whack job to the core!

        • d rash

          I disagree! He is worse than ANY whack job we can imagine! A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama! The Obama wrecking ball is salivating at just the mere thought of having Ron Paul as the (R) candidate. Want 4 more years of Obama? If so, support Ron Paul. Paul WILL give us Obama!

          • Leslie

            d bag, we know you’re a troll, its always the same you never have anything new to contribute, just a troll.

          • Roy

            gee you sure sound stupid

          • Clifford Johnson

            One of the good things is that after ron paul is put on the trash heap of nut job candidates he will never be able to mount a campaign again as he would be 80 during the next election cycle–if he lives that long!

        • Ken

          I am a conservative. And I am awake. Now show me a conservative to vote for besides Ron Paul????

          • Patriot 101

            You have it figured out! There are no consevatives except Ron Paul!

          • Ruth

            We had a couple of real conservatives, Santorum, and Bachman, but they were not given a chance. Too many people don’t pay enough attention, just hear what the media wants them to hear. Media plays up the more known names (maybe because they get more money from those candidates, and from the Obama administration?)and the sheeple all follow.

          • American Patriot

            Patriot 101,
            I am as conservative as anyone can be. I have NEVER voted for a Dumbocrap in nearly sixty years of voteing.
            I am voteing for Ron Paul because he is the only true conservative running. The trolls say that’s a vote for Odumba. NOT TRUE!! It’s a vote for Ron Paul, the man that can and will do the job he is hired to do. His age is no problem. He’s a very healthy man.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Hey Ron, whack this!

        • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

          ENGIE, GREAT COMMENT, RIGHT ON… WE ALL MUST WORK TOGETHER TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY, CONSTITUTION BACK !!

      • Dan

        Is anybody fool enough to think that Romney will repeal ObamaCare if he gets elected President? Romney invented ObamaCare ! ! ! !

        The repeal of ObamaCare is high on the list of Conservative Republicans.
        The only Republican candidate we can trust to do that is RON PAUL.

        GO RON…GO RON…GO RON…GO RON…GO RON

        • d rash

          EL TORO POO POO! Paul is just an old fool, that just wants to take America down a DIFFERENT path to destruction!

          • Willis

            Its Ron Paul or Obama.

            That’s your only choices.

            The youth have spoken.

            And believe me; for those who lived through the last of Clinton, all of Bush, and now Obama are voting now. They want freedom.

            For them its Freedom vs. Tyranny; and you old 45′s to 60 somethings who are crying RP is too old. Listen to the youth. ” WE DONT TRUST YOU, but WE LOVE AMERICA!!!!”

          • Roy

            go on Derash finnish you’re papplem and don’t forget to have you’re mama wash you’re face

        • Kiki

          Obama said he wanted to “fundamentally change America” and he did. Romney said he will “repeal Obama care” and he will. Anyone who thinks that the Huffington Post has the Republican’s best interests at heart, shouldn’t be able to vote.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            WILLIS, WHAT A MENTAL MIDGET…. YOUTH SHOULD HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE 50′S,60′S HAVE & MAYBE JUST MAYBE WE WILL LISTEN TO YOU… WHAT MAKES YOU AN AUTHORITY ON POLITICS ….UNTIL THEN GROW UP….YOU WILL BE OLDER SOME DAY { IF YOU DO NOT DO THE WHACKY TOBACKY} IS THAT WHY YOU ARE VOTING FOR PAUL…I BET THERE WILL BE A LOT OF YOUTH VOTING BECAUSE OF WHAT HE WANTS TO DO ABOUT DRUGS… WILLIS SOUNDS LIKE OBAMA, HE WILL VOTE FOR THE PERSON FOR HIS SELF GAIN, LIKE OBAMA & ALL HIS UNDERHANDED , CROOKED DEALS, BILLS FOR HIS SELF GAIN !! IT IS SAD THIS AMERICA HAS COME TO THIS !

      • barry

        RPG, Get a new slogan…smoking somethin…GROW UP and learn something new like how to think for yourself…Try it and you will like it!!!

      • Paul

        No one wants a slick, phony, Mexican Mormon flip-floppin’ NWO-stooge!

      • Richard

        RINO!!!

      • johnk

        you mean obama-lite?
        no

      • IdontBrakeForDems

        RPG, hold on to that thought. As we progress through primaries we will soon see just how many more millions of voters Paul will add to his fastest growing list of supporters. You can’t listen to the media, they are pushing only establishment republican candidates so we can be assured of more of the same. Ron Paul is the only candidate that will truely change our country for the betterment of all, especially freedoms. Ron Paul 2012

        • Dan

          I feel obligated to remind you Ron Paul folks that Congress writes the laws. The pres. has very little power in law making. All of Paul’s promises can only come to fruition IF Congress agrees. I certainly hope all you Paul fanatics vote for Tea Party congressional candidates. The message is one in the same.

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            DAN, NOT WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION…THEY HAVE DONE AS THEY PLEASE WITHOUT THE REPUBLICANS…BESIDES WE DO NOT HAVE THE MAJORITY, OBAMA DOES…THE SENATE & OBAMA WOULD JUST VETO ANYTHING THE HOUSE OR CONGRESS TRIES TO DO, AMEN !!

      • TommyGun

        rpg you need to go to http://tinyurl.com72u2hby
        and watch the video in full you will find out just
        how great this CREEP romney really is. I would
        vote for a frog before I would romney.

      • RonW

        RPG. I suppose since you believe that one would wonder why you would even be wasting the time and energy to be here saying it. It really never ceases to amaze me. Just how much you naysayers shoot your selves in the foot by turning out in mass each and every time Ron Paul overturns your previous proclamations into rubbish by doing exactly what your crystal ball told you to say he couldn’t do. And your really not looking forward to the results of South Carolina voting are going to rub you faces in. Coming very soon to TV screens across the planet.

      • William

        Your line of thinking is flawed.

        The majority of Ron Paul supporters are principled.

        We will not vote for any other candidate. We’ve had enough. It’s time to travel the road less traveled.

        Now adding in the factor, that the less principled voter has the “We’ll vote for anyone but Obama” mentality.

        As long as you’re “for anyone but Obama” and you fear that Ron Paul and his supporters are going to split the vote.

        The only logical solution is to support Ron Paul.

        We’re not gonna back down. You don’t really care who wins or why?

        See that’s the difference in Principled and Unprincipled. We’re voting for something important and to defeat Obama. You, You just want to defeat Obama.

        Join us, or… enjoy Obama 2012!

        Your choice? Think about and get back to us.

        • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

          WHO IN HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE WILLIAM ?? WE DO NOT NEED YOUR ADVICE OR A MATTER OF FACT, YOUR COMMENTS… “JOIN US OR ENJOY OBAMA, YOUR CHOICE? THINK ABOUT IT & GET BACK TO US” ?? YOU ARE A TRUE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT THAT IS FALSELY FEEDING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BULL SH$$ ON THIS PAGE…HOW DARE YOU !!

          • William

            It is obvious that the only reason you are posting here is to berate and engage in belligerent expressions of emotional constipation.

            Repeatedly poster claim Paul and his supporters will hand Obama the election by splitting the vote, when the majority of those posters have no opinion other than “Just vote for the Nominee”.

            Very well, that is the right of all that choose to do so.

            Along the length of this thread you have done nothing with the exception of make accusations of Ron Paul’s candidacy.

            Yourself, just as others that have elected to pursue the same course of action, never bother to post any form of substantiation for your your statements. Effectually rendering all of your postings impotent.

            Also in similarity, you all seem to declare your very existence depends upon the Feceral government and it’s ability to “Protect you”.

            Sadly enough, the fate of such individuals in the face of disaster end up much as the Katrina survivors. Unprepared for disaster you will huddle together and wait for someone to come to your aid.

            Such is the fate of those who fail make to assume responsibility for themselves.

            Yet you all cry out “The Government will take care of us”.

            Perhaps you haven’t heard, “Our Government is broke”!!!!!!!

            Earlier you pissed and moaned about “No Foreign Aid to anyone.

            “Where exactly do you suggest we get the money to continue such policies?

            Hundreds of thousands of needy in this country and we send billions of dollars around the world that we could be using here that need the government to take care of them.

            Quite frankly, I’m not even certain that you are worth the effort of this reply. You know nothing of me. From your unsubstantiated postings, you obviously lack any real knowledge of the context of your own posts.

            You have shown the lack of professionalism, a complete and total absence of civility to all that you have addressed as such I feel secure in saying for myself as well as others “You are Dismissed”.

    • Dolores Tamoria

      If he wasn’t electable he would not be running. Being electable does not mean winning the Nomination.

      • Konig

        OMG – the “Do Nothing” minor congressman from Texas is a joke beyond measure. He has never had a single piece of legislation past even if a GOP-controlled congress. He is the 2012 version of Republican Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern rolled into one RINO skin. While he MAY have a few good deas for the Fed, he only wants his anti-war voice to be heard. He is a twit.

        • Willis

          Your logic is failing.

          Throw some money at it.

          • csh

            Ron Paul stands for the Constitution which recognizes our rights. Don’t blame him because he’s had to deal with a bunch of RINOs and sell outs in Congress and the Senate.
            He is the ONLY one who votes 100% constitutionally, 100% of the time. He has spent the last 20 plus years educating Washington, and he has proven himself right on economics and the federal reserve disaster. He will prove himself right with foreign policy as well….. because it is our CONSTITUTIONAL direction. It makes sense if you take the time to actually study it.

        • Chad

          Too bad he wasn’t like your man.. Passing Patriot Act, TSA, NDAA, Weapons bans, ect.. You know the good stuff.

          • TommyGun

            Right on Chad….. Just think folks if we get our
            Constitution back up and running, Then the
            the rest of our Government will be just fine.

        • Richard

          Kudos to csh. You hit the nail on the head. We are governed by the Constitution, not that bunch of weasels supposedly elected to represent US in Congress. They forget their place and have twisted the function of Congress beyond recognition.

          • Bonnie

            Lets not forget Ron Paul is part of that congress!

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Konig, blow it out your ass.

        • ticktockoma
        • RonW

          You have also just stuck foot in mouth. THE GOP in DC is just as dirty as the democrats. ALL the long term entrenched law makers, are the very reason we American”s will be cleaning house real soon. If you can’t understand that. You must be one of them, or paid to visit these comment boxes and spin that BS. Sorry about your luck. Good will for the first time in decades win the day. People are going to JAIL.

        • RonW

          Konig Don’t suppose it has dawned on you that its real dangerous talking too loudly against the FED. Just ask John and Bobby Kennedy. Lets see. A sitting President who two weeks prior to his murder. Made it known that he and his brother, The US Attorney General were going to go after the corruption that began in 1913 and more powerful than ever in 1963. A corruption that extended all the way from DC to Rome to Brussels, to Hamburg, To London, Paris and beyond might have required some guts? huh? Probably don’t matter that the very same infestation is what is driving America towards her absorbtion into this abomination now calling itself “ONE WORLD GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” Don’t suppose the thought ever occured to you that many of our politicians are so badly compromised that even if they don’t want to ho along with that program. They can do nothing about it. There is also the ones that have jumped on board with both feet knowing their treason will be rewarded even more by our new rulers. Want a sneak preview of what that will look like? Youtube search Nigel Farange addresses to the EU Counsel. There are many video’s to choose from. Look at 4 or 5 of them to get the real flavour of what awaits an uninvolved sleeping America. After you do that come on back and Put on your I am an American hat. If you have one.

        • Robert Stone

          Obviously you haven’t checked out Ron Pauls message or read his books or listened to what he is saying. he is far from Eugene Mc Carthy, who was a peace but had no real substance, no full policy on all areas of government. Paul has very specific and radical change directed to save the economy and get us out of the grip of control that is destroying us… to cut out the cancer before the patient dies…. (in case you didn’t realize the patient is dying)

        • William

          Please allow me to correct you. It wasn’t that he never tried, it’s just the rest of those asses don’t care about your liberties.

          Hold on, this is gonna hurt.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_legislation_sponsored_by_Ron_Paul

          Foreign policy
          [edit] Nonintervention

          Kosovo, 1999–2000: Prohibits the Department of Defense from using troops in Kosovo unless specifically authorized by law.[2]
          Constitutional War Powers Resolution of 2001. H.J.Res. 27, 2001-03-06. Repeals the 1973 War Powers Resolution entirely, prohibiting presidents from initiating a war without a formal declaration of war by Congress.[3] Ron Paul did not sponsor or co-sponsor this.
          Iraq Resolution declaration of war. Motion in re H.J.Res. 114, 2002-10-02. In order to prevent Congress from yielding its Constitutional authority to declare war to the executive branch, which does not Constitutionally hold that power, gives Congress the opportunity to declare war on Iraq, rather than merely “authorizing” the president to deploy forces without a declaration of war.[4] Paul said that he would not vote for his own motion, but that if his fellow members of Congress wished to go to war in Iraq, they should follow the Constitution and declare war.
          Iran and Syria: H.Con.Res. 43, 2007-01-23. Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should implement Recommendation 9 of the Iraq Study Group Report. Urges the President to implement Recommendation 9 of the Iraq Study Group Report, recommending direct diplomatic engagement with Iran and Syria toward constructive results.
          Sunset of Public Law 107-243 Act of 2007. H.R. 2605, 2007-06-07. Establishes a sunset clause for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. As one of six Republicans to vote against the Iraq Resolution (which authorized military force for stated purposes without declaring war), Paul also inspired the founding of a group called the National Peace Lobby Project to promote a resolution he and Oregon representative Peter DeFazio sponsored to repeal the war authorization in February 2003. His speech, 35 “Questions That Won’t Be Asked About Iraq”,[5] was translated and published in German, French, Russian, Italian, and Swiss periodicals before the Iraq War began.[6]
          Constitutional War Powers Amendments of 2007. H.J.Res. 53, 2007-09-25 (cosponsor). Replaces the 1973 War Powers Resolution with law ensuring the “collective judgment of both the Congress and the President” in use of war powers.

          [edit] International organizations
          Further information: United States withdrawal from the United Nations

          American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009. H.R. 1146, 2009-02-24, originally H.R. 1146, 1997-03-20. Ends U.S. participation and membership in the United Nations and its activities.
          World Trade Organization, 1999-2000: Withdraws U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization.[2]

          The American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009 (ASRA) is U.S. House of Representatives bill 1146 (H.R. 1146) of the first session of the 111th Congress, “to end membership of the United States in the United Nations” (U.N.). The bill was first introduced on March 20, 1997, as H.R. 1146, to the first session of the 105th Congress (the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 1997); it was a legislative effort to remove the U.S. from the UN.[7] Paul reintroduced the bill on February 24, 2009[8]

          The bill was authored by Ron Paul to effect U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. It would repeal various laws pertaining to the U.N., terminate authorization for funds to be spent on the U.N., terminate U.N. presence on U.S. property, and withdraw diplomatic immunity for U.N. employees.[9] It would provide up to two years for the U.S. to withdraw.[10] The Yale Law Journal cited the Act as proof that “the United States’s complaints against the United Nations have intensified.”[11]

          In a letter to Majority Leader Tom DeLay of April 16, 2003,[12] and in a speech to Congress on April 29, Paul requested the repeatedly-bottlenecked issue be voted on, because “Americans deserve to know how their representatives stand on the critical issue of American sovereignty.”[13] Though he did not foresee passage in the near future, Paul believed a vote would be good for “those who don’t want to get out of the United Nations but want to tone down” support; cosponsor Roscoe Bartlett’s spokeswoman similarly said Bartlett “would welcome any action that would begin the debate”.[12]

          It had 54 supporters in the House in its first year.[7] It was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and was never released for a vote.

          National Review cited the ASRA as an example of grassroots effort “to educate the American people about the efforts of foreign tyrants to disarm them”.[14] Supporters approved of its intent to end financial ties to the UN, its peace-keeping missions, and its building in New York City.[15] A report by Herbert W. Titus, Senior Legal Advisor of the Liberty Committee, concluded that “the American Sovereignty Restoration Act is the only viable solution to the continued abuses of the United Nations.”[16]

          On its front page, the Victoria, Texas, Advocate, a newspaper in Paul’s district, expressed pride for the Act in the face of what it called several undeclared “United Nations wars”.[17]

          Henry Lamb considers it “the only way to be sure that the U.S. will win the showdown at the U.N. Corral”, considering that without withdrawal, U.N. claims of diplomatic immunity and Congressional subpoena power threaten each other, as in the oil-for-food scandal.[10]

          Critics say it “undoubtedly paints a bull’s-eye across the entire country”.[18] Tim Wirth, president of the United Nations Foundation, finds the bill contrary to United States interests: “This piece of legislation has been brought by Ron Paul every year over the last 20 [sic] years and it never goes anywhere.”[12]

          A policy review of U.S.–Canada relations describes the Act as reflecting “extreme views,” but indicative of a majority pro-sovereignty view in Congress, expressed in tighter border and immigration policy, unilateralism in foreign policy, and increased national security focus.[19]

          Similar U.S. legislation includes Ron Paul’s proposal to end U.S. contributions to the United Nations and affiliated agencies, which had Republican support but failed as an appropriations amendment by a vote of 74;[20] and Roscoe Bartlett’s proposal to cut a $100 million payment to the U.N., based on General Accounting Office claims that the U.S. has overpaid by $3.5 billion (the UN claimed that it was owed $1.3 billion).[21]

          The 2002 Republican Party of Texas platform explicitly urged passage of the ASRA; withdrawal from the U.N. had been on the platform at least since 1998.[22]

          Both houses of the Arizona legislature introduced legislation petitioning Congress to pass the ASRA (HCM 2009 in 2004, SCM 1002 in 2006);[23][24] in 2007 similar legislation passed the Arizona Senate (SCM 1002 in 2007), but with the focus changed from the ASRA to Virgil Goode’s Congressional resolution not to engage in a NAFTA Superhighway or a North American Union (H.Con.Res. 487, now H.Con.Res. 40).[25][26]

          The John Birch Society recognizes the ASRA as a reflection of its efforts since 1962 toward U.S. withdrawal.[7] Their publication New American sees Nathan Tabor’s anti-U.N. book, The Beast on the East River, as a building block toward ASRA passage,[27] which it advocates because “the U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations.”[28]

          In 2000, Tom DeWeese’s American Policy Center said it delivered to Congress more than 300,000 signatures from petitions in support of the Act.[29]

          An organization calling itself the Liberty Committee also organized a nationwide petition drive asking Majority Leader Tom DeLay to schedule the bill for a vote.[30]
          [edit] Borders and immigration

          Terror Immigration Elimination Act of 2007. H.R. 3217, 2007-07-27, originally H.R. 488, 2003-01-29. Limits the issuance of student and diversity immigrant visas in relation to Saudi Arabia, countries that support terrorism, and countries not cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism efforts.
          Birthright citizenship: H.J.Res. 46, 2007-06-13, originally H.J.Res. 46, 2005-04-28. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to deny United States citizenship to individuals born in the United States to parents who are neither United States citizens nor persons who owe permanent allegiance to the United States. Clarifies the Fourteenth Amendment in accord with Paul’s opposition to birthright citizenship.
          Trans-Texas Corridor: H.R. 5191, 2008-01-29. To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out the highway project known as the “Trans-Texas Corridor”.

          [edit] Terrorism

          Police Security Protection Act. H.R. 3304, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 1410, 1997-04-23 (Law Officer’s Armor Vest Tax Credit Act of 1997). Creates tax credit for law enforcement officers who purchase armor vests.
          Anti-Terrorism Act of 2007. H.R. 3305, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 2896, 2001-09-14. Proposed immediately after the September 11, 2001, attacks, permits pilots and navigators of aircraft, and law enforcement personnel detailed to aircraft, to carry firearms.
          Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007. H.R. 3216, 2007-07-27. To authorize the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

          [edit] Economy
          [edit] Taxes

          Tax Free Tips Act of 2009. H.R. 779, 2009-01-28, originally H.R. 4408, 1998-08-05. Provides that tips shall not be subject to income or employment taxes.
          Public Safety Tax Cut Act. H.R. 3303, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 3124, 1999-10-21. Creates tax credit for police officers and professional firefighters, and makes public safety volunteer benefits nontaxable.
          Cost of Government Awareness Act of 2007. H.R. 3601, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 4855, 2000-07-13. Eliminates employer withholding tax and replaces it with monthly installment payment of income tax by employees, finding that withholding taxes are inherently deceptive and unfair and that they “hide the true cost of government from taxpayers, making tax increases more feasible”.
          Taxpayers’ Freedom of Conscience Act of 2009. H.R. 1233, 2009-02-26, originally H.R. 1548, 2003-04-01. To prohibit any Federal official from expending any Federal funds for any population control or population planning program or any family planning activity.
          Property tax: H.R. 4293, 2007-12-05, originally H.R. 5860, 2006-07-20. Creates income tax deduction for real property taxes.
          Abolition of income tax: H.J.Res. 23, 2007-02-07. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in competition with its citizens. Repeals the Sixteenth Amendment, income tax, estate tax, and gift tax, and limits the government only to Constitutionally authorized enterprises. Paul had proposed similar legislation in 1999-2000 and in 2001.[2]
          Lutetium oxide: H.R. 962, 2009-02-10, originally H.R. 3731, 2007-10-02. To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide, an ingredient in laser crystals.
          Tax Relief for Transportation Workers Act. H.R. 1097, 2009-02-13, originally H.R. 5991, 2008-05-07. To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for obtaining transportation worker identification credentials.

          [edit] Inflation

          Affordable Gas Price Act. H.R. 2415, 2007-05-21, originally H.R. 4004, 2005-10-06. To reduce the price of gasoline by allowing for offshore drilling, eliminating Federal obstacles to constructing refineries and providing incentives for investment in refineries, suspending Federal fuel taxes when gasoline prices reach a benchmark amount, and promoting free trade.
          Make No Cents Until It Makes Sense Act. H.R. 4127, 2007-11-08. To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the further minting of 1-cent coins until the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System certify in writing that there is not a surplus of 1-cent coins already available for use in transactions, and for other purposes. The U.S. Mint currently spends $.014, which is more than the face value, for each copper-clad zinc U.S. cent it produces.[31] Paul joked, “We can’t even afford a zinc standard anymore.”[32]

          [edit] Sound money/Federal Reserve

          Coinage Act of 1983. Called for new legal-tender gold and silver coins. Ahead of its time, this Act anticipated the successful Gold Bullion Coin Act of 1985, which led to the minting of American Gold Eagles.[32]
          Gold standard, 1983: Attempted to reinstate the gold standard.[32]
          Coinage legislation, 1984: Sought to require Congressional approval of any new coinage and paper money designs, and formal retention of all test notes from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.[32]
          Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act. H.R. 833, 2009-02-03, originally H.R. 1148, 1999-03-17. Abolishes the Federal Reserve Board and its banks and repeals the Federal Reserve Act.
          Honest Money Act. H.R. 2756, 2007-06-15, originally H.R. 2779, 2003-07-17. Repeals 31 U.S.C. 5103, the legal tender law that currently mandates acceptance of Federal Reserve notes as legal tender, in accord with hard money policy.
          Sunshine in Monetary Policy Act. H.R. 2754, 2007-06-15, originally H.R. 4892, 2006-03-07. Requires the Federal Reserve Board to continue to publish the M3 monetary aggregate on a weekly basis. The Federal Reserve ceased publishing M3 statistics as of March 23, 2006, explaining that it costs a lot to collect the data but does not provide significantly useful information.[33]
          Free Competition in Currency Act of 2007. H.R. 4683, 2007-12-13. Strikes sections 486 and 489 of title 18, United States Code, due to “prosecutorial abuse”.[34] The Code sections effectively restrict private minting, and were cited by the FBI as justification for its November 2007 raid of Liberty Services, and its seizure of property allegedly including nearly two tons of precious metals and copper — much of which had been independently minted by Liberty Services with Paul’s image.[35] Paul commented, “If we don’t do something about the dollar, the market will. I would like to legalize competition in currency.”[32]
          Tax-Free Gold Act of 2008. H.R. 5427, 2008-02-13. To provide that no tax or fee may be imposed on certain coins and bullion. Prohibits taxation on gold, silver, platinum, palladium, or rhodium bullion and transactions, and state taxation on gold and silver legal tender currencies and instruments in interstate or foreign commerce.
          Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009. H.R. 1207, 2009-02-26. To reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported. Ensures the audit results are available to Congress,[36] and includes the Fed’s “discount window”, its funding facilities, its open market operations, and its agreements with foreign bankers.[37] Proponents state that the Fed has never been audited by Congress since the Fed’s creation in 1913.[38][39] The Federal Reserve states that “the financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors are audited annually by an independent outside auditor.”[40] Paul says that the present audit process exempts the Fed’s “most crucial activities”.[41]

          Significant advocacy for the Transparency Act has ensued. At a rally in Bloomington, Indiana, outside the office of Baron Hill (D-IN), a Young Americans for Liberty petition encouraging Hill to vote in favor of the bill circulated among a crowd of 200; Hill did not comment to YAL, according to member Meredith Milton.[42] The advocacy group Campaign for Liberty (CFL) encourages members to petition representatives to cosponsor the Transparency Act,[43] sponsoring hundreds of pro-bill rallies in cities like Boone, North Carolina;[44] Peoria, Illinois;[45] Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;[46] and (CFL regional conference) St. Louis, Missouri.[47]

          Glenn Beck of Fox News mentioned the Transparency Act while discussing ways for the average person to remind Congress, “Hey, you work for me”.[48] During Beck’s April 15 show from his rally at the Alamo in San Antonio, Pat Gray interviewed a local supporter of the Transparency Act, drawing cheers from the crowd.[49] A blogger on The Motley Fool website called the bill “the first attempt at a true audit of the Federal Reserve since its inception in 1913″ and affirmed Paul’s Congressionally published column describing his legislation.[50][51]

          Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009. H.R. 1348, 2009-03-05. Requires the Federal Reserve to publish information on financial assistance provided to various entities during the bailout of 2008; creates a website listing all banks that have borrowed from the Fed since March 24, 2008, and the amount, terms, and “specific rationale” of the loans. U.S. Senate sponsor Bernie Sanders (I-VT) commented, “I have a hard time understanding how you have put $2.2 trillion at risk without making those names available.” Fed chair Ben Bernanke had told Sanders that publishing the names would make the banks feel stigmatized and potentially reluctant to borrow further.[36]

          [edit] Social Security

          Social Security earnings limit repeal (cosponsor): Repealed the earnings limitation on Social Security. Seniors now continue working after retirement without being penalized.
          Social Security Beneficiary Tax Reduction Act. H.R. 161, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 2723, 1997-10-23. Repeals the 1993 increase in taxes on Social Security benefits.
          Social Security Preservation Act of 2009. H.R. 219, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 219, 1999-01-06, cosponsored since H.R. 857, 1997-02-27. Invests the Social Security surplus “trust funds” in marketable interest-bearing obligations and certificates of deposit, essentially insuring the integrity of the surplus.[2]
          Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act. H.R. 162, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 4790, 2002-05-22, cosponsored since H.R. 761, 1999-02-12. Makes Social Security and Railroad Retirement Board payments nontaxable.
          Social Security for Americans Only Act of 2009. H.R. 160, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 489, 2003-01-29. Limits Social Security benefits to U.S. citizens and nationals.

          [edit] Constitutional rights
          [edit] Freedom of religion

          Religious Freedom Amendment. H.J.Res. 78, 1997-05-08 (cosponsor). Clarifies the “right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience” to include the right of prayer in public schools and other public property, and to prohibit state establishment of religion or requirements to participate in prayer.
          Hostettler amendment (Ten Commandments display): H.Amdt. 278, 2005-06-15 (voted in favor), amending H.R. 2862, 2005-06-10. Defunds the southern Indiana U.S. District Court judgment Russelburg v. Gibson County, which had directed the removal of a Ten Commandments display on the county courthouse lawn.[52] The district judge later reversed himself, holding that the Indiana display met the Supreme Court of the United States’s test described in Van Orden v. Perry, handed down two weeks after the Hostettler amendment.[53]
          See We the People Act.

          [edit] Freedom of association

          National ID (amendment): Prohibited funding for national identification numbers.[2]
          Identity Theft Prevention Act of 2009. H.R. 220, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 220, 1999-01-06 (Freedom and Privacy Restoration Act). Protects Social Security number confidentiality, prohibits uniform national identifying numbers, and prohibits imposition of federal identification standards.
          TV Consumer Freedom Act. H.R. 3602, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 1078, 1999-03-11. Requires consent for signal retransmission, eliminates must-carry requirements, terminates Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates for television features and functions, and clarifies retransmission rights of satellite carriers.
          Freedom to Bank Act. H.R. 1419, 2009-03-10, originally H.R. 6297, 2006-09-29. Ends laws and regulations which deny decision-making opportunities and communication control to bank account holders. States in its long title that such laws “treat the American people like children”.

          [edit] Right to keep and bear arms

          Second Amendment Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 1096, 2007-02-15, originally H.R. 2721, 1997-10-23. Defends law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights to own firearms.
          National Park Second Amendment Restoration and Personal Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 1897, 2007-04-17. Prohibits firearm regulation within the National Park System. Based on 2006 legislation by Senator George Allen.
          Citizens Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 2424, 2007-05-22. Repeals the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 as amended.
          See also the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2007.

          [edit] Habeas corpus

          See American Freedom Agenda Act.

          [edit] Limited government

          Term limits, 1970s: Paul was the first member of Congress to propose term limits legislation in the House,[54] one of several bills considered “ahead of their time” by Texas Monthly magazine.[2]
          Market Process Restoration Act of 1999. H.R. 1789, 1999-05-13. Repeals United States antitrust law (which limits cartels and monopolies), with intent to restore market economy benefits.
          To repeal the Military Selective Service Act. H.R. 424, 2007-01-11, originally H.R. 1597, 2001-04-26, cosponsored since H.R. 2421, 1997-09-05. Abolishes the Selective Service System, prohibits reestablishment of the draft, and forbids denial of rights due to failure to register.
          Eminent domain: Prevented the Department of Housing and Urban Development from seizing a church in New York through eminent domain.[2]
          International Criminal Court (ICC): Barred ICC jurisdiction over the U.S. military (2002 amendment).[55]
          Global tax: Barred American participation in any U.N. “global tax” (2005 amendment).[55]
          Surveillance: Barred surveillance on peaceful First Amendment activities by citizens (2006 amendment).[55] Individual privacy may be an area of Paul’s greatest influence, and he has long worked tirelessly against forms of what he considers to be federal snooping.[2]
          Sunlight Rule. H.Res. 216, 2009-03-05, originally H.Res. 709, 2006-03-02. Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon. Prohibits votes on legislation from occurring until ten days after its introduction, with the intent of giving lawmakers enough time to read bills before voting on them; allots 72 hours for House members and staff to examine the contents of amendments. Paul charged his fellow legislators with voting for the Patriot Act in 2001 without reading it first; more than 300 pages long, it was enacted into law less than 24 hours after being introduced.[56]
          Congressional Responsibility and Accountability Act. H.R. 3302, 2007-08-01. Prohibits federal rules and regulations not enacted into law by Congress, if they result in job loss or exceed specified costs to individuals, corporations, or all persons in aggregate.
          American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007. H.R. 3835, 2007-10-15. To restore the Constitution’s checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers. Proposes to “bar the use of evidence obtained through torture; require that federal intelligence gathering is conducted in accordance with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA); create a mechanism for challenging presidential signing statements; repeal the Military Commissions Act, which, among other things, denies habeas corpus to certain detainees; prohibit kidnapping, detentions, and torture abroad; protect journalists who publish information received from the executive branch; and ensure that secret evidence is not used to designate individuals or organizations with a presence in the U.S. as foreign terrorists.”[57]
          See also the limited government and income tax abolition amendment.

          [edit] States’ rights
          [edit] We the People Act

          We the People Act. H.R. 539, 2009-01-14, originally H.R. 3893, 2004-03-04. Forbids all federal courts from hearing cases on abortion, same-sex unions, sexual practices, and establishment of religion, unless such a case were a challenge to the Constitutionality of federal law. Makes federal court decisions on those subjects nonbinding as precedent in state courts,[58] and forbids federal courts from spending money to enforce their judgments.

          Because it forbids federal courts from adjudicating “any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion”, secularists have criticized the bill as removing federal remedy for allegations of state violation of religious freedom.[59] As an example of potential for violation,[citation needed] Article 1 of the Texas Constitution provides the (currently unenforced) requirement that office-holders “acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being”. The Democratic Underground online community published the holding that the bill would give state sexual-orientation laws special immunity.[60] The bill is comparable to other jurisdiction stripping legislation such as the Constitution Restoration Act.[61]

          Paul told Congress, “The best guarantor of true liberty is decentralized political institutions, while the greatest threat to liberty is concentrated power.”[61] In April 2006 the Traditional Values Coalition encouraged its contacts to lobby their representatives for passage;[62] the bill was also endorsed by columnist Rev. Chuck Baldwin,[61] and cosponsors include Roscoe Bartlett, Tom Tancredo, Sam Johnson, Walter Jones, Jr., John A. Sullivan, John Duncan, Jr., and Ted Poe.
          [edit] Abortion

          Sanctity of Life Act of 2007. H.R. 2597, 2007-06-06, originally H.R. 776, 2005-02-10. For the purposes of statutory construction over the jurisdictional limitation imposed, declares that “human life shall be deemed to exist from conception”. Removes federal court jurisdiction over abortion cases arising from state laws and effectively negates Roe v. Wade as binding legal precedent.[63] Such a law returns to each state the power to decide whether or not abortion should be allowed, banned, or regulated.
          See also Taxpayers’ Freedom of Conscience Act of 2007.

          [edit] Stem-cell research

          Cures Can Be Found Act of 2009. H.R. 1654, 2009-03-19, originally H.R. 3444, 2005-07-26. Provides tax credits for qualified stem-cell research or storage and for donation of umbilical cord blood.

          [edit] Capital punishment

          Opposes federal use of capital punishment.[64][65]

          [edit] Education

          Teacher certification (amendment): Prohibited funding of federal teacher certification.[2]
          Family Education Freedom Act of 2009. H.R. 1951, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 1816, 1997-06-05.[66] Provides tax credits to families towards spending on any type of children’s education–related expenses, public, private, or homeschool.
          Education Improvement Tax Cut Act. H.R. 1952, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 936, 1999-03-02. Applies a $5,000 tax credit per child for donations to any school in support of scholarships or academic or extracurricular programs.[67]
          Teacher Tax Cut Act of 2009. H.R. 1949, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 937, 1999-03-02. Provides all elementary and secondary school teachers with a $1,000 tax cut.
          Hope Plus Scholarship Act of 2009. H.R. 1953, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 2410, 2001-06-28. Includes qualified education expenses within the Hope Scholarship Credit.
          Professional Educators Tax Relief Act of 2009. H.R. 1950, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 2411, 2001-06-28. Gives all K–12 school librarians, counselors, and other personnel the same $1,000 tax credit as the Teacher Tax Cut Act.[68]
          Make College Affordable Act of 2009. H.R. 1954, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 401, 2005-01-26, cosponsored since H.R. 1631, 1999-04-29. Creates full tax deduction for higher education expenses and interest on student loans.
          Education Professional Development Tax Credit Act of 2007. H.R. 4078, 2007-11-05. To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow elementary and secondary school teachers a credit against income tax for professional development and training expenses.

          [edit] Sexual orientation legislation

          Marriage Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 724, 2007-01-30, originally H.R. 3313, 2003-10-16 (cosponsor). To limit Federal court jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act. Explicitly permits states to continue making a public-policy exception when deciding the status of same-sex relationships independently of the decisions of other states, as states have in fact been permitted to do in the case of incestuous marriages.[69]

          [edit] Environment

          A bill to repeal the Soil and Water Conservation Act of 1977. H.R. 7079, 1980-04-16.
          Dredging: H.R. 7245, 1980-05-01. Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to remove federal jurisdiction from dumping in private (non-navigable) waters, and from state dumping permit programs; permits applicants, rather than the Secretary of the Army, to specify disposal sites when requesting permission to discharge dredged or fill material into interstate navigable waters.
          Fisheries: H.R. 3735, 1998-04-28. To disapprove a rule requiring the use of bycatch reduction devices in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Annuls federal mandates that require private fisheries to reduce catches of non-targeted species at their own cost.
          Environmental Protection Agency: H.J.Res. 104, 2000-07-13. Disapproves an EPA rule published on 2000-07-13, relating to proposed revisions to its pollutant discharge reduction program, federal antidegradation policy, and water quality planning and management regulations.
          Lake Texana dam: Transferred ownership of the Lake Texana dam project from the federal government to Texas.[2]
          San Jacinto disposal area: H.R. 4829, 2007-12-18. To authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey the surface estate of the San Jacinto Disposal Area to the city of Galveston, Texas.
          To provide for the transfer of certain Federal Property to the Galveston Historical Foundation. H.R. 2121, 2009-04-27, originally H.R. 6440, 2008-07-08.
          Energy Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Automobile Tax Credit Act of 2009. H.R. 1768, 2009-03-26, originally H.R. 6441, 2008-07-08.

          [edit] Health
          [edit] Health reform

          Quality Health Care Coalition Act of 2009. H.R. 1493, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1247, 2003-03-12. Exempts health care professionals from antitrust laws in their negotiations with health plans and health insurance issuers.
          Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act of 2009. H.R. 1495, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1287, 2003-03-13. Strengthens health savings accounts and credit for health care costs, carries forward unused health benefits, and repeals threshold on medical expenses deduction.
          Seniors’ Health Care Freedom Act of 2009. H.R. 164, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 580, 2005-02-02, cosponsored since H.R. 2867, 1999-09-14. Facilitates private contracts under Medicare.
          Nursing Home Emergency Assistance Act. H.R. 1494, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4002, 2005-10-06.
          Treat Physicians Fairly Act of 2009. H.R. 1497, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4872, 2006-03-02. Creates tax credit to medical care providers against income tax for uncompensated emergency medical care, and deduction to hospitals for such care.
          Enhanced Options for Rural Health Care Act of 2007. H.R. 1899, 2007-04-17, originally H.R. 6154, 2006-09-21. Gives specific permission for rural health facilities designated as critical access hospitals to offer assisted living services without losing their designation.

          [edit] Tax cuts

          Prescription Drug Affordability Act. H.R. 163, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 3636, 2000-02-10 (Pharmaceutical Freedom Act). Creates prescription drug tax credit and facilitates import and Internet sale of such drugs.
          Cancer and Terminal Illness Patient Health Care Act. H.R. 4684, 2007-12-13, originally H.R. 4265, 2000-04-13. Assists those suffering from cancer and other life-threatening illnesses by waiving the employee portion of Social Security taxes.
          Child Health Care Affordability Act. H.R. 1496, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4799, 2000-06-29 (Family Health Tax Cut Act). Creates income tax credit for medical expenses for dependents.
          Freedom From Unnecessary Litigation Act of 2009. H.R. 1498, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1249, 2003-03-12. Creates tax credit for the cost of insurance against negative outcomes from surgery, such as against malpractice of a physician.
          Evacuees Tax Relief Act of 2008. H.R. 7055, 2008-09-24, originally H.R. 4066, 2005-10-17.
          Phosphoric acid: H.R. 961, 2009-02-10, originally H.R. 3732, 2007-10-02. To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphoric acid, lanthanum salt, cerium terbium-doped, compounds which have medical uses.

          [edit] Alternative Health

          Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act. H.R. 5842, 2008-04-17, cosponsored since H.R. 2592, 2001-07-23 (States’ Rights to Medical Marijuana Act). Protects authorized medical marijuana patients and protects state-legal farmers against federal raids. Lets states choose their own stances on medical marijuana regulations, and permits further study, regulation, and use by reclassifying the plant medically.
          Parental Consent Act of 2007. H.R. 2387, 2007-05-17, originally H.R. 5236, 2004-10-06 (Let Parents Raise Their Kids Act). To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental health screening program.
          Health Freedom Protection Act. H.R. 2117, 2007-05-02, originally H.R. 4282, 2005-11-09. Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding health claims of foods and dietary supplements. Authorizes specific health claims to be made about saw palmetto, omega-3 fatty acids, glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and calcium. Establishes government burden of proof in false advertising cases.
          Act to Remove Federal Penalties for the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults. H.R. 5843, 2008-04-17 (cosponsor).

          [edit] Agriculture

          Ag and rural legislation: Cofounded Congressional Rural Caucus, a bipartisan group which promotes legislation to help the agriculture industry and rural communities.
          Agriculture Education Freedom Act. H.R. 1955, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 3626, 1998-04-01. Makes nontaxable the sale of animals raised and sold as part of an educational program.
          Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009. H.R. 1866, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 3037, 2005-06-22. Excludes industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana for Controlled Substances Act purposes, thereby giving the states the power to regulate and permit farming of hemp. The measure would be a first since the national prohibition of industrial hemp farming in the United States. Paul joined prominent liberal Democrats in urging this proposal. He contends that it would help North Dakota and other agriculture states, where farmers have requested the ability to farm hemp for years.[70] The Economist wrote that his support for hemp farming could appeal to farmers in Iowa.[71]
          Seafood: H.Con.Res. 125, 2007-04-23 (cosponsor). Recognizing the health benefits of eating seafood as part of a balanced diet, and supporting the goals and ideals of National Seafood Month.
          Unpasteurized milk: H.R. 778, 2009-01-28, originally H.R. 4077, 2007-11-05. To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and milk products that are packaged for direct human consumption between states permitting its sale.

          [edit] Ballot access

          Voter Freedom Act of 2007. H.R. 3600, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 2477, 1997-09-16. Establishes the right of ballot access for candidates with timely petitions containing 1,000 signatures.

          [edit] References

          ^ Paul, Ron (September 2007). “Ending the IRS”. Ron Paul 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
          ^ a b c d e f g h i j Gwynne, Sam C. (2001-10-01). “Dr. No”. Texas Monthly. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
          ^ Dougherty, Jon (2001-03-13). “Bill would restore Congress’ war powers”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2007-06-13.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2002-10-03). “Is Congress Relevant with Regards to War?”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on 2007-11-30. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2002-09-10). “Questions That Won’t Be Asked About Iraq”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2007-07-03. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
          ^ Murray, Shailagh (2003-03-10). “A Far-Right Texan Inspires Antiwar Left”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2007-06-15.
          ^ a b c Smith, G. Vance (2001-10-22). “The Way to Win: G. Vance Smith is chief executive officer of The John Birch Society”. New American. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ Bill Summary & Status Search Results – THOMAS (Library of Congress)
          ^ “Rep. Paul Introduces American Sovereignty Restoration Act” (subscription). US Fed News Service. 1997-03-01. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
          ^ a b Lamb, Henry (2005-05-16). “Showdown at the U.N. corral”. Enter Stage Right. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ Resnik, Judith (May 2006). “Law’s Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism’s Multiple Ports of Entry”. Yale Law Journal 115 (7): 1659. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ a b c Chumley, Cheryl K (2003-04-24). “New push to ‘get U.S. out of U.N.’: Congressmen ask for House floor vote during time of disdain for global body”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2003-04-29). “America National Sovereignty vs. U.N. “International Law”: Time for Congress to Vote”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on March 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ Kopel, Dave (2001-08-09). “U.N. Out of North America: The Small Arms Conference and the Second Amendment”. National Review. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ Williams, Kyle (2003-05-03). “Walking out of U.N.”. Veritas (WorldNetDaily). Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ Titus, Herbert W. (2003). “H.R. 1146 – The American Sovereignty Restoration Act”. Liberty Committee. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
          ^ Editor (2003-06-11). “Rescue U.S. from the U.N.”. Victoria Advocate: p. 1. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
          ^ Powell, Keith J (2003-06-25). “The ongoing battle of the U.S. versus the rest of the world”. BG News. Retrieved 2008-04-10.[dead link]
          ^ Cooper, Andrew F.; Rowlands, Dave (2005). Canada Among Nations: Split Images. Drache, Daniel, contrib.. pp. 117, 131. ISBN 9780773530263. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
          ^ Mbogo, Stephen (2003-07-16). “House Votes to Fund U.N. but Not Population Fund”. Cybercast News Service. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
          ^ Elvin, John (1997-10-06). “Actually, the United Nations Owes Us!”. Insight on the News. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ McManus, John F (2002-08-26). “Texans issue a challenge”. New American (American Opinion Publishing). Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003″. Arizona Legislature. 2004. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2005″. Arizona Legislature. 2006. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and Any Other Bilateral or Multilateral Activity That Seeks to Create a North American Union”. Arizona Legislature. 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ “Bill Status Overview: SCM1002″. Arizona Legislature. 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
          ^ Behreandt, Dennis (2006-12-11). “Stalking the Beast”. New American. Archived from the original on 2007-10-11. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ McManus, John F (2005-05-30). “U.S. defenders or UN enforcers? The U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations. America’s Armed Forces must be restored to their only proper role: national defense.”. New American. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
          ^ Bowen, Greg (2000-09-08). “Petitioners want U.S. out of U.N.”. Victoria Advocate: p. 1A. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
          ^ “Liberty Committee: Just 15 Minutes to Answer America’s Question About the United Nations” (subscription). U.S. Newswire. 2003-04-24. Retrieved 2008-04-10.[dead link]
          ^ Norris, Floyd (2006-04-22). “A Penny for Your Thoughts, and 1.4 Cents for the Penny”. New York Times. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
          ^ a b c d e Doyle, Al (2007-07-23). “Presidential candidate Paul passionate over hard money: Texas legislator once ran investment coin firm”. Coin World. Archived from the original on 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-02-14.
          ^ “Discontinuance of M3″. Federal Reserve. 2005-11-10. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2007-12-13). “Statement Introducing the Free Competition in Currency Act”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on 2008-02-02. Retrieved 2008-02-08.
          ^ Lesnick, Gavin (2007-11-15). “Liberty Dollar office raided”. Evansville Courier & Press. Retrieved 2008-02-08.
          ^ a b Kraft, Stephanie (2009-03-26). “Imperium Watch: Banks, Soundproof No More: U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont calls out the Federal Reserve for coddling the country’s biggest lenders”. Valley Advocate. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ Chapman, Bob (2009-04-18). “Gold, Silver, Economy & More”. International Forecaster (GoldSeek). Retrieved 2009-04-19.
          ^ Kolar, Peter (2009-03-24). “Time to check Federal Reserve”. Baraboo News Republic. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ Chaney, Paul (2009-03-21). “Wrong agenda”. Los Angeles Daily News. Retrieved 2009-04-14. Also in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, the San Bernardino County Sun, and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
          ^ “Since the Federal Reserve has considerable discretion in carrying out its responsibilities, to whom is it accountable?”. Federal Reserve Board. 2007-03-07. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2009-04-20). “Audit the Federal Reserve for answers”. Politico.com. Retrieved 2009-04-20.
          ^ Ayari, Mehdi (2009-04-16). “More than 200 march on Tax Day”. Indiana Daily Student (Indiana University). Retrieved 2009-04-16.
          ^ “‘Audit the Fed’ petition to Congress”. Campaign for Liberty. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ Sztukowski, Edward (2009-04-07). “Students throw modern day tea party on Tax Day”. The Appalachian (Appalachian State University). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ McDonald, Karen (2009-04-15). “More than 500 protest during tax day ‘tea party’”. Peoria Journal Star. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
          ^ Wagh, Manasee (2009-04-19). “A timeless protest of government”. Doylestown Intelligencer. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
          ^ Messenger, David (2009-03-30). “Ron Paul draws students to Liberty Campaign event”. Student Life (Washington University). Retrieved 2009-04-14.[dead link]
          ^ Beck, Glenn (2009-03-23). “Are You Profiled as a Militia Member?”. Glenn Beck (Fox News). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ “Glenn Beck”. Glenn Beck (Fox News). 2009-04-15. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
          ^ “Support H.R. 1207 to Audit the Federal Reserve”. Motley Fool. 2009-03-10. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2009-02-23). “On Transparency of the Fed”. Texas Straight Talk (111th Congress (2009)). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
          ^ “Congress Assaults the Courts, Again”. New York Times. 2005-06-18. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
          ^ “Judge rules Gibson County can keep Commandments”. Around the State (Indiana Daily Student). 2005-09-09. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
          ^ “The Libertarian Congressman Is Back”. Wall Street Journal: p. A18. 1997-01-13. Retrieved 2007-09-27.
          ^ a b c Bresnahan, John (2007-10-10). “Paul says Americans’ freedoms under siege”. Politico. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2007-09-16). “The Sunlight Rule”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2007-09-27.
          ^ “Tell your U.S. Representative to co-sponsor the American Freedom Agenda Act”. American Freedom Campaign. 2007-10-15. Retrieved 2007-10-15.
          ^ Rhodes, Randi (2007-08-16). “Ron Paul interview battles Air America Randi Rhodes Show”. Air America Radio. Retrieved 2007-09-27.[dead link]
          ^ Ebonmuse (2008-01-06). “Why Atheists Shouldn’t Vote for Ron Paul”. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
          ^ “The We the (Evangelical) People Act”. Democratic Underground. 2007-12-24. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
          ^ a b c Strom, Ron (2006-01-13). “Bill limits federal courts: Would stop judges from ruling on abortion, same-sex marriage cases”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
          ^ “Action Alert: We, The People Act”. Traditional Values Coalition. 2006-04-06. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
          ^ Paul, Ron (2007). “Life and Liberty”. Ron Paul 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
          ^ Lofton, John (August 2007). “Excerpts From Our Exclusive Ron Paul Interview”. American View. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
          ^ Smiley, Tavis (2007-09-27). “Ron Paul At Tavis Smiley’s All-American Forum On PBS 9-27-07″ (video). Tavis Smiley’s All-American Forum (PBS). Retrieved 2008-02-06.
          ^ “H.R. 368 – Family Education Freedom Act of 2001″. Home School Legal Defense Association. 2002-06-27. Retrieved 2007-09-13. “Parents and individuals who provide for a child’s education should be allowed to keep some of their tax money that would otherwise have been used to fund public education.”
          ^ “Rep. Paul Introduces Education Package”. Education Exchange. Education Policy. 1999-03. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
          ^ “Teacher Tax Cut Act”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. 2003-02-11. Archived from the original on 2007-09-03. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
          ^ Grossman, Joanna (2004-07-27). “The Proposed Marriage Protection Act: Why It May Be Unconstitutional”. Writ. FindLaw. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
          ^ “Reefer Madness: ‘Let’s Embarrass Ron Paul’”. Austin Chronicle. 2007-05-25.
          ^ “On a high”. Economist. 2007-06-21.

      • Chad

        I’m going with the only one who stands for what I believe in and, has the 20 yr. history of proof(not flip flopping lip service). Anything else would be cheap and stupid seeing the Evidence of the other FAKES.

        I’m going for morals, rock steady & unbribable beliefs and honesty.. RP

        • Patricia Gault

          Chad,
          Some folks on here don’t remember that the media and the dems pushed McCain’s nomination last time around, cause they knew he was weak and would not win against Oblabla, so this time it’s flip-flopper Romney. Check out how many of these candidates belong to the Bilderberg group, or CFR or NWO. Check out these groups and you’ll see who is the best candidate. Both sides are equally corrupt. And besides that Ron Paul rides his bicycle two to three times a week- for twenty miles at a time. Too old, wish I could do that at 63. Go Ron Paul!!!!!!!

        • IdontBrakeForDems

          Right on Chad

        • RonW

          Chad
          Fakes might be a little harsh. Huntsman I think probably just is not fully aware of really is at play in DC. I say that because its highly likely that his lack of support from the powers that be. Suggest that they don’t want him yet. They don’t have their hooks into him yet. Which is why he dropped out of the race. Wish I could say the same for the rest. Especially Romney. But alas I can not. I’m 62 and have slept with one eye open since the moment I while in school I as were my class mates told of JFK’s assassination. I’m not an awakening sleeper. I have seen and analysed every newsworthy event in real time since that horrid day. I can tell you with out doubt. Ron Paul is America’s last chance at saving our Country, Constitution and the America I was once proud of. Were down to VOTES in this election cycle. or four years from Nov. 3rd and there is no voting polls. We face BULLETS and RIOTS in and on America’s streets. I prefer The Constitutional way. Ron Paul in 2012.

      • Clifford Johnson

        He is not electable and he IS running! ron paul’s hubris is only exceeded by his ignorance and insane policy positions. Michelle Bachman was not electable and she ran. Jon Huntsman ran and he was not electable. Because you have the hubris to put yourself out there does not mean you have any chance of being elected.

        • Willis

          WE DON”T TRUST YOUR KIND, Cliff!!

          You are the Military Industrial Complex.

        • RonW

          Only a TRAITOR to America would call Ron Paul’s run at the Oval Office hubris. BIG FAIL pal. Go back to your office over at the FED. and Tell your partners Yup. Were in trouble.

        • Robert Stone

          Not so. He has fought for real freedom from financial enslavement and sanity in foreign policy for many years. He is not just being out there, he is in full attack mode and when people get past the old foolish man picture pained by the mass media mind manipulators, then people see, this guy is amazing. What he is saying just has NEVER been said and done before. It s that radical and that good. Read Liberty Defined.

        • William

          Dear Clifford,
          Please sir, share with us your explanations of Ron Paul’s in-electability.

    • Ron

      I will be willing to bet my house and properties, that Ron Paul will not win the nomination. Who wants to take me up on an equal bet??

      • Willis

        You must work for the media.

        You gonna shave some points here and there to ensure the win?

        • patriotrenegade

          no jack. To win a general you must carry the independent/swishy center. L ron paul hubbard will not carry the center EVER. You wanna win the general election or a beauty contest? How old are you, and were you a bama voter last time?

          • Willis

            Are you talking political spectrum center or Establishment being the center?

            The establishment is boiling down to fewer and fewer people. They have to disseminate their ideas through their dying “media.” But the rank and file are jumping ship into the lifeboat of Liberty!!!

            I never liked Obama, but I didn’t like Bush either.

            I voted for Chuck Baldwin in protest for the Establishment offering me McCain.

      • Remington 870

        I won’t bet you. You win. The GOP is obviously in big trouble with a canidate to take on teleprompter Obama. Romney is Milk Toast, Newt has more baggage than a train station, and Ron Paul is out there. We needed Cain, but he was destroyed. We are left with another John McCain who will be steam rolled by Team Obama. It is going to take a real miracle to get Obama out of office.

        • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

          Nice Gun! I have one also!

        • d rash

          Well, Ron Paul ain’t the man for the job! If Ron Paul is so great, name me on piece of legislation he has written, sponsored and gotten passed in over 20 years of service. ZERO, ZILCH, NADA!!! Not one piece of legislation has this “super hero” gotten passed in 20 YEARS OF BEING IN CONGRESS! NOT ONE! Give me a break! And you want put this 20 year loser in charge? Besides, IF, by some VERY LARGE MIRACLE he did win the general election, he would not live to see innaguration. John Kenedy was shot, in 1963 because he signed an Executive order, curtailing the FED! Ron Paul wants to rein in, and eliminate the FED. Do you think those VERY POWERFUL people who run the fed, (no one knows who they are) will allow this Twit, to come in and upset their apple cart? Irrespective of the outcome of ANY election, win or lose, Ron Paul will NEVER (thankfully) EVER, be president of the United States. “THEY”, whoever “they” are will kill him first!

          • patriotrenegade

            you are in the right ballpark, look up CFR, trilateral commission, and bilderbergs. That’s who really owns the fed.

          • kellys

            Its not about passing legislation, there is too much already that has been passed, its about keeping the big spending socialists left and right from doing anymore harm.

          • Leslie

            d bag= blah,blah,blah…insert insult, blah,blah,blah Kennedy, blah,blah,blah….insert insult, blah,blah,blah, shot,blah,blah,blah……..etc.

          • csh

            The Kool-Aid drinkers are the ones who won’t think for themselves, or read anything that isn’t scripted from the RINO camp. Quit believing all the garbage the GOP RINOs are pumping out, and take the time to study the constitution and our founding documents to see why they were written in the 1st place. They were written for our protection…. and there is only one candidate that votes 1005 constitutionally 100% of the time….. Ron Paul. The other hypocrites take an oath to uphold it, but then vote against its direction….. against us. Gingrich, Romney, Santorum are all Big government people… just look at what they vote for. Ron Paul is the ONLY Candidate who has the record to prove that he will stand with the people, becsuse he stands on the constitution…. the others don’t.

          • Randall

            not one piece of legislation, you act like that is a bad thing. how many laws do you want to be ruled by?

          • RonW

            NOT if We The People surround Doc Paul with our body’s for protection. You forget it is our We The People’s children that drive and fire our nations tanks, Fly our nations Fighter jets, make up the ranks of our NAVY, ARMY, MARINES, COASTGUARD, NATIONAL PARK POLICE, BORDERGUARDS, STATE and LOCAL POLICE. And should Doc Paul have ANTHING happen to him. It will be OUR children who will decide who’s pictures get placed on the many decks of cards like they were sent into IRAQ with. It will not be the high ranking HIDDEN ONES at THE FED AND THUGS, and yes d rash.We do know who most of them are. RETIRED GENERALS, NEOCONS, and CORRUPTED GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS and their THINKTANK Advisors that sit on Corporate Boards of Weapons manufacturers. It will be their pictures that the owners of the over 2 plus million hunting licenses sold annually in the US that will make that decision. If it comes to that. The garbage will be easy to spot. They will be the ones running towards the exit signs with crap stains seeping through their pants.

        • AMERICAN

          Obummer is subpoenaed to court Jan. 26, 2012, in Georgia. He has to have a full birth certificate. no copies. All his school records, A social security card. Papers of His real name before he was adopted by His father. Papers on all the name He used in His life time. Hawaii has to turn over a full birth certificate. I think the snake just got caught. I don’t think He will be running for president. I also think Dr. Ron Paul, is healthier, has a great understanding or a high mantal capacity, quick to comprehend, & a sound mine, other than all the idiot, running with him. He is true to His earnest belief, He has all the knowledge or proof, to what this country needs. He has fought and defended for our rights for 30 years. He is going to be America’s next President. Americas, the ones that listen to Dr. Paul, are turning to Him fast. He will have no problem winning. When all the no doers drop out and let this wonderful man help America. Where He can talk and tell America what He knows must be done, to turn us around. He said he can pay off the debt, America has in three years. We all should get behind this intelligent man and help him.

          • RonW

            My understanding on that matter is not as you describe it to be. I read a news blurb stating the case was about mother being full fledged citizen under state law that only men were allowed to vote and there for wives were not considered citizens. Supreme court blew that notion apart in the 18th century.

      • Paul

        Why would I want to win your cardboard box, you Occupier NWO-stooge troll?

      • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

        Beware Folks! This might be the real Ron Paul Talking!

        • RonW

          My name is Ron Willison, Should you be referring to me. Ca resident.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        The only reason Ron Paul will not win the nomination is because the GOP, like their counterpart are a bunch of Constitution-hating, self serving swine.

      • Clifford Johnson

        Hey Ron! Can I throw in a few thousand dollars and back some of your action on this bet? Any of you ron paul “followers” willing to put your money where your big mouth and loud talk is. Also, if you want to bet be sure and put up enough to make it worth the effort. I will be waiting for your reply you ron paul cowards. Let’s get this wrapped up, put the money in escrow and see what happens.

        • Andy Miller

          No we are going to give it to the only man that will solve the mess you idiots have made in America by watching the BLOOOP Tube, Then voting for the media puppet!

        • Karl Kocher

          It appears all the loud talk and big mouths is being done by the people who want big gov. I put my money where my common sense tells me to. I donate to Ron’s cause. I read all the time these “nice” comments such as Ron Paul should be charged with treason – but those saying this have yet to explain why. Talk about big mouths. It is a shame that there are those that want the Constitution destroyed and will support anyone that wants to do it. Also it is a shame that these same people need to resort to name calling and never can back up their insults with facts.

        • RonW

          Sorry. Clifford Johnson Wish I could take you up on that. Unfortunately, the policy’s of the last 8 administrations have me just short of joining my brothers on the local freeway off ramp. Unless you might think a sign that says Vietnam Vet. Will work for food. Has value.

      • American Patriot

        Ron,
        Just where is your little trailer or is it a tent? How big is your lot? 20×30 or smaller?

    • AZ Don

      I’m not certain I agree with that opinion that he is better than Romney or for that matter Gingrich. However, unlike many of the Paul supporters I will view it with an open mind and not only accept Paul if he is the nominee but support him every way possible. If he is not the candidate on the other hand and he runs as an independent I will “not” support him in any way. In other words who ever the Republican candidate is, is who I will support. It is imperative we beat obama! I actually like Gingrich because I think he has the most experience to fix all the problems obama has created in the last 3 years. Believe me it will take experience. We all know that a good congressman (that does a good job) will make some enemies during his tenure, Gingrich did but considering the job he did that speaks for him not against. Furthermore, there is not a perfect candidate out there. The last perfect president when elected was Washington. There has been some pretty good ones since but not when they took office. Like Lincoln, Coolidge and Reagan but they were undiscovered talent before taking office.
      My problem with Paul is I fear obama will beat him up or perhaps just kill him in a debate. I know he has some good ideas and most of them I totally agree with. But you understand obama is the master of BS and Paul is very honest and forthright that in my opinion puts him at a disadvantage. Just how important do you think it is to beat obama?

      • Willis

        You are kidding!!

        You haven’t “experienced” enough Dr. Paul if you think Obama would even be able to begin to beat him in a debate.

        Dr. Paul is a way better debater than anyone in the field.

        No teleprompters for the Doc.

        • ANNIE

          maybe not…but will he make it across the stage without falling??? come on folks…look at him…is that what you want leading our country??? can he even hop a plane..without falling????? give me a break…we need a young guy with some substance!!!!! paul would never be able to debate obama..it takes him too long to form his sentences……..

          • kellys

            Reagan was elected twice at the same age.

          • Leslie

            Annie you are a great example of why this country is in such bad shape, you don’t have your priorities in order if you think Ron Pauls age is going to deter him in any way you’re mistaking, physically he’s in better shape than most of the previous presidents and mentally, yes he could beat Obama in a debate- he’s honest so he can answer questions quickly (he doesn’t have to take the time to remember what lie he told the last guy) and his age certainly is a benefit in this case, he knows economics he knows history and if you refuse to listen to him because of his age, I think that makes you unreliable, why would anyone listen to you when you don’t have all the information because you refuse to listen to one of the candidates for no other reason than his age? wisdom comes with age, I image you to be about 5.

          • Ann in Nebraska

            Annie, you obviously know literally nothing about Dr. Paul. He is an avid walker and he’s probably more physically fit than you are!!!! He walks at least three miles a day, every day. Please take a few minutes and acquaint yourself with the real Dr. Paul, not the one you have imagined him to be. Ron Paul 2012!!!

          • Mundus Vult Decepi

            My dear Annie, you truly are a moron.

          • Andy Miller

            Anne you are so stupid, don’t you know Dr. Ron Paul runs every day including everything else he is doing. I’ll bet you couldn’t keep up with his pace for 1 week!

          • TommyGun

            Miss Annie if my memory serves me right I recall we once had a Pres. who disliked flying took to the air very few times but made a good Pres. We once had a pres.
            Who had Surgar di beatus but Again made a good Pres.
            and we evan had one confined to a wheel chair….How far did you make it Annie ?

        • csh

          he has the most experience in helping Obama’s push for BIG government. Don’t forget who that guy is…. He supported all the BIG government take overs and infringements of our rights… NAFTA… GATT…. TARP…. The PATRIOT Act… Bailouts for his friends…… He only tries to sound constitutional friendly during his campaign speeches, but in reality he votes against it and the people. RON PAUL is the ONLY candidate who votes 100% constitutionally, 100% of the time. He is for us…. we need to be for him, and all other constitutionalists on all levels in government. We can only get our government back by becoming the government by being involved ourselves. “BY”, “OF”, and “FOR” The People. Vote Ron Paul – it’s a vote for us.

          • Andy Miller

            Very well said!!!

        • patriotrenegade

          debate debate debate debate -it’s the voting that counts, debates are soon forgotten. You wanna win a battle or win the war?

          • Willis

            We want to win the war. That’s why we fight HARD.

            But swishy Republicans don’t want to win wars they want to Make Money off of Wars (and are turning the dollar into a counterfeit piece of worthless paper). That is why we are ideologically stomping a mudhole in their rear. We have the numbers despite their dying “media” attempts to discourage us.

            We fight to WIN!!!!!

            We research to CURE; not treat.

        • Morning Star

          You are mistaken…Ron Paul would be putty in the hands of Obama in a debate. You really think Paul is a debater? Wake up. You Ron Pauler’s only want to put Obama back in office. Ron Paul is an isolationist. I listened to him, just as I listened to Obama. I knew Obama was a disaster because I LISTENED to his words and knew just how dangerous he was. I also LISTENED to Ron Paul’s words and he tells me he is just as dangerous if not more so than Obama. By the way, where is he getting all this money from to compete if he doesn’t take money from PACS…Perot or Soros? Romney or Gingrich may not be angels, but I’ll take them in place of Paul or Obama any day of the week, month, year or century!

          • Steve

            Obama can only speak in platitudes, and that only when single words (hope, change, “yes we can”) are insufficient. He has absolutely no substance to any of his arguments, except what has already been written by marxists and communists. Ron Paul has very specific ideas and very specific plans to implement those ideas. Substance trumps fluff any day of the week in a Presidential debate, and Ron Paul would run circles around Obama on any topic you could name. While Obama was community organizing Dr. Paul was honing his message. While Obama has played golf, Paul has been hammering this message of freedom, liberty, sound money, and non-interventionism. At this point in our history the ideas embraced and articulated by Ron Paul are the only ones that can keep us from descending to third world status within a decade.

          • Steve

            I forgot to include in the response above that, unlike other candidates who are most certainly the recipients of PAC money and huge donations from the elite, Ron Paul’s campaign has been funded by the purest grass-roots support of any candidate I know. I have contributed to, and closely watched, the “money-bombs” his campaign has used to raise funds. The increments of money come in as small donations from people who see exactly what has happened to this country and understand that Ron Paul’s solutions are the ones that can actually work to put our nation on the right track.

        • William

          I think his last statement concerning Obama’s debating abilities was a polite way of saying that “If you can’t blind them with brilliance; Baffle them with Bull*#@t!!!

          He might have a valid argument, given the fact that many Americans are incapable of Free Thinking.

          Because while Obama maybe incapable of applying BS to Ron Paul, He has shown the ability to BS the masses.

          Although I am hopeful that many are seeing through the poo.

      • Engie

        You should consider taking another look at Lincoln…he WASN’T the wonder president history has tried to portray him as.

      • IdontBrakeForDems

        A sack of potatoes would beat obama in this upcoming election cycle! This election will be a landslide and obama is going down in flames. The ONLY way obama can win is if mickey mouse votes A LOT plus all the dead people etc. come out to cast their votes. A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for the constitution and freedom to the people. A vote for any other republican is a vote for more of the same. However, no matter who is the nominee, that person will get support from the majority whom hate obummer. Barry is toast.

      • Chief2u

        I totally agree with you, I call it pick of the litter. That is who I will support and vote for.

      • RonW

        AZ DON. The mess you talk about begins long before Obama’a addition. The damage to America began in earnest in 1913. Sad part is only High ranking Public servants knew what was causing it. And they kept their mouths shut. The only reason Obama’s contributions seem accelerated is because the long hidden secrets have been brought into the daylight and the Internet has allowed the accumulation of supporting and additional information to be gathered in totality. And the picture painted is UGLY. Not ALL of our politicians are corrupt. I can tell you this though. All the ones that have hung onto high positions of power over decades are. The ones that are owned is obvious. Their voting record shows that. The ones that are not dirty, and delude themselves with the notion that “Well I can at least try do do some of the people business” are in fact enablers. Had they chosen to back Doc Paul’s term after term attempts to get legislation to the floor for an up or down vote on setting term limits at two. Then that would have said something positive about them. But alas. No other men or women with guts heard liberty’s call to duty. They chickened out.
        Is it not interesting that? People that come to these comment boxes, or their blog sites. Fail to understand that they are so flawed in their thought processes. That they call a man who has until the recent arrival of us Paulbots. A looser, who can’t get anything done in Washington as a law maker. ergo how can he be a President? They miss the point, and stupidity in those kinds of statements and others like it. When I hear comments like, “He’s already ran and lost twice, and will again.” I know they are either enemy’s of mine and America. Or they are just too lazy and unwilling to vet the information they so freely pontificate about. And that makes them also an enemy of mine. By never taking the time to ask Why? Why do his electorate keep sending him back in their behalf? What is it they know about the man that those outside of his district don’t know? Why is such a looser as the simpletons out here call him. still thinking he can beat Obama in the general election? They don’t ask those questions because they stopped teaching their children the meanings of words like determination, tenacity, honesty, duty, the difference between right and wrong, love of country, civic pride and involvement, caring enough about All the people of the world, And courage. To understand just how bad it has gotten here in the US. Excluding our children, brothers, sisters, uncles and dads etc. That do place themselves in harms way. Police and etc. Their have been none with high enough rank and political power to take a stand against high level governmental corruption since John and Bobby Kennedy. Ron Paul is the first in all those years who by the way has spent the better part of 20 plus years single handedly fighting against corruption and to little avail. Why? people? Ask your self, Why does he do it? Does it not scream at you? the answer to those questions? Are you that uncaring about what our Nation has become? Is leaving it as is what you really want your children’s children to live in? Are they to grow up believing that nothing good is worth saving? Are sense of purpose, drive for anything but money, power fame. To be considered bad things? Is that the Country you want to hand down? If there is anybody on this planet besides Doc Paul willing to fight for Good? Let him step forward. Don’t bother sending out anyone that is not wear a ball cap that says. END THE FED on it. What’s that? Oh you can’t find any? Go FiretrUCKING figure.:( In the meantime there are those of us out here that have connected the dots and WASHINGTON be it known by all WE ARE WATCHING!

    • RacerJim

      “…stop listening to the lame, lying mainstream media and read ConservativeByte where the people tell the truth.”

      Stop listening The Huffington Post.

      • Patriot 101

        I’m sticking up for this author. Read the entire article, then post your opinion, other wise SHUT UP!
        I’m not a fan of HuffPo, but this author hit a home run! Good article.

        • Clifford Johnson

          I read the article and this woman is as big a nut job as ron paul. She said that ron paul would get the votes of a lot of dummycrats (despite ron paul’s policy positions that fly in the face of dummycrat positions). The dummycrats villlified McCain for his age–72– what do you think they would do to Dr. Kevorkian–I mean ron paul? If you are stupid enough to believe that ANYTHING ever written in the Huffington Puffington Post would ever be put there to advance the Conservative agenda then you need to be committed to a home for the criminally insane. Moron.

          • Andy Miller

            Clifford I’ll bet you couldn’t keep up with Dr. Ron Paul for one week!

          • Dagny

            Andy, I’m certain Clifford, Annie, and the other ageist morons couldn’t keep up with Rep. Paul for a DAY! Neither can the other candidates. Last summer Paul challenged them all to a 20 mile bicycle race in Houston, when the temp was 100F and the humidity was 100%. Needless to say, they all declined. If they had participated, I suspect most of them would have had heart attacks, and thinned the field considerably.

            Clifford, Annie and the rest are probably fat slobs who don’t know what lean and healthy (which describes Rep. Paul) even looks like.

    • Larry W.

      It is NOT a funny thing that Ron Paul supporters ignore his foreign policy then resort to Obama tactics of name calling and scatter brain data.

      Certainly Ron Paul has great budget ideas, but we have to protect the remnants of what Obama has left us by air, sea and if necessary on land. Most Ron Paul supporters seem to be saying that the current military is suitable to tackle any adversary. So you folks are fine with a small number of Americans bearing more burden of defe3nding this country after 10 years of grinding them down bit by bit. Throwing away such known facts as “100% better” and thrown in an ambiguous one of 99% benefitting from the sacrifice of 1% in uniform. When you sit there pounding on your PC, you ignore the reality of neighbors patrolling in foreign lands to keep us all safer.

      I just have no more time for you rhetoric. It is so Obamaesk!

      • patriotrenegade

        excellent sir, spot on

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Larry, don’t be such a paranoid scardy cat. Grow up pussy boy.

      • Willis

        Wrong.

        You say “we’ve been grinding them (the military)down bit by bit for ten years.”

        We say, EXACTLY!! That foreign policy makes us weaker.

        Obama wants to cut defense to use the money for his BS pet programs and economic planning initiatives. THAT IS NOT OUR POSITION.

        We want American families to be together. We want our forces to be home fed and STRONG. We want our weopons to be clean and ready for defensive action. We want our demeanor to be kind yet strong; not belligerent yet tattered.

      • csh

        I see most of the name calling coming from those who are attacking Ron Paul…. the only “real” constitutionalist in the whole candidacy. Ron Paul Is a brilliant economist and he has been warning Washington for years about the Federal Reserve Bank and the debt system….. Now that our economy is crashing, and his words are proving true, they are finally listening to him.

        They need to listen to him regarding our foreign policy as well, because his words will prove true there as well. We are NOT making ourselves stronger by being scattered all over the world….. we are fractionalizing ourselves, so we may be in more places, but we are wearing our guys out. Ron Paul gets more support from our military than all the other candidates put together. They realize that they are being used more as world police for the U.N. than they are as a defense for us. We would save untold billions of dollars by bringing them back home, and refocusing our efforts on actually building “this” country back up again, both physically and emotionally. As a constitutional noninterventionist, (not the RINO term of isolationist) we can still remain allies with countries and trade with them. The difference is though that we will actually “protect” our borders instead of leaving them wide open for any danger that wants to slip through. It’s time to bring our people home, and rebuild both physically and emotionally. We don’t need to act like a nanny, a bully, or the world police.

        Ron Paul has no hobble to him as he walks across the stage, but even if he did, I’d rather support a guy who needed a walker if he would support legislation that would turn this country back to the constitution. That’s what counts.

        I’m for the one guy who honors the constitution and “The People” … Ron Paul.

        • RonW

          Wish I had said that.

      • Clifford Johnson

        Well put Larry W. I think that every candidate running has a good idea or two. Hell, even a broke clock is right twice a day. However, ron paul’s insane foreign policy positions put him way beyond the pale of consideration for me.

        • Willis

          Clifford Johnson – de facto spokesman for the Military Industrial Complex.

        • CJM

          There are Thousands of senior citizens who are extremely intelligent and continue to have full control of their capacities just as there are thousands of young people who are in that same category. I would prefer Ron Paul over the unintelligent, lying, thief, and criminal that now squats in our Oval Office and imagines himself to be the President of the United States. Gingrich and Romney are nothng but the same ilk as obama and wil sell us out for even bigger $ to our enemies. If anyone thinks Romney will repeal obamacare, think again–he has repeatedly stated that he stands behind his romneycare package that he foisted onto the good citizens of MA–and it is romneycare that obammy patterned his garbage after. As far as foreign affairs go, what’s wrong with cutting off ALL foreign aid to those countries who are making demnds on our tax money while they continue to stab the USA in the back–they shouldn’t be recieiving ANY assistance from the US and as long as our government is handing over the funds, it is akin to aiding and abetting the enemy, which is against the law.

    • http://verizon BILLY DICK

      I CAN GIVE YOU 100 REASON WHY HE CAN NOT GET ELECTER. A VOTE FOR PAUL IS A VOTE FOR OBAMA.

      • http://conservativebyte.com/2011/08/five-reasons-obamas-speech-stunt-hurts-him/ Stop obama!

        You are so right!

        The people who voted for obama are the ron paul people now. They are sold on a fake “peace,” and an non-intervention charade. As long as there is danger to our democracy and freedom, there has to be an intelligent strategy to keep the US safe and free! ron paul does not have it, PERIOD!!!

        • Ann in Nebraska

          Stop obama!, you said “The people who voted for obama are the ron paul people now. ” Such being the case, Dr. Paul is a shoo-in for the presidency!!!!!!!!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!

        • csh

          You are really missing it…. Ron Paul is gaining voters from the Democrats, independents, and Republicans…. that’s “why” he is the only guy that can take on Obama and win. The constitution appeals to us all, and I have voted Republican all my long life.

          The other candidates are cut from the same big government cookie cutter, but just called by another name. They have earned the name RINO, because they are Republican In Name Only. Ron Paul is the most conservative of all of them and is most like the Republican party of the past. The party has slid to the left so far, that following the constitution now seems “crazy” to them.

          However, following the Constitution is the smartest thing we can do. It was written to protect the people… that means you and I, and Ron Paul is the only one who will vote accordingly to the constitution 100% of the time. We can count on him. He won’t be a flip flopper like those other candidates.

          And he won’t be voting for more big government bills like these other guys will. Just look at their record. Remember GATT, NAFTA, TARP, the PATRIOT Act, Bank bailouts for their friends????

          Ron Paul voted against these things. Yes, he stood alone many times as he stood up to the Fed for our benefit, but he had the guts to do it. THAT is being a leader.

          He will have much more influence to help us as president, especially if we continue to put in other constitutionalists to support him.

        • Clifford Johnson

          You have it stated perfectly Stop obama!.

      • Paul

        … writes a 3rd grade drop-out…

        • Paul

          Of course, that was for “BILLY DICK”

        • patriotrenegade

          there you 20 yr old jackoffs go with the slander and lies again. Do you have anything to back up your cult/brat behavior?

          • Willis

            Have you gone toe to toe with the dying “media?”

            And I am takimg TOE to MF’n TOE!!!

            We are the only troops who are willing to do BATTLE with OWS, MSNBC, CNN, FOX News, The FEDERAL RESERVE and all the other CFR related groups that you hate.

            We hit the internet hard, but, just as hard, we hit the street.

            So call us brats, but, I ask you honestly, WILL YOU TROLL WITH ME in the general election?

      • kellys

        A vote for anyone other than Ron Paul is a vote for someone just like Obama, if not Obama himself.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Billy Dick, your last name says it all. Ya dick.

      • Joey

        Okay Billy Bo I can give you 200 reasons why he can get elected. Now doesn’t this make us real debaters. You want to come back with 300?

        A Vote for Paul is a vote for liberty!!!

        • Pepper

          I can come up with 16 TRILLION reasons real easy to vote for Ron Paul.

      • Patricia Martin

        Start listing them One, Two, Three, etc.

      • RonW

        Wrong a vote for Paul is the only thing that will save your butt.

      • William

        I for one would like to read those one hundred reasons. Please post them.

    • PATTY

      GOD BLESS AMERICA
      AND
      GOD BLESS
      RON PAUL
      I’M VOTING FOR YOU!!!!!

    • Mary

      He is not better than Romney. Paul is a isolationist. A moron who would watch Iran get a nuclear device and destroy Israel. Do you really want that kind of blood on your hands? You may want to think twice about anything written in this article. Look at the source and shame on Conservative Byte for putting it out there as truth. Huffington Post/AOL is probably the most liberal rag in the country. Arriana Huffington and George Soros go way back. I would trust a darn thing this group puts out.

      • Willis

        Romney can’t win.

        He doesn’t resonate with the young.

        And, unfortunately for him the elephant in the room is that he is a Mormon. A heretic in most Christians eyes.

        Republicans might engineer the nomination for Romney, but without support from the grassroots with REAL FERVOR, he’s got no chance in the general.

        • Paul

          That IS an accurate appraisal of the slick and phony Mexican Mormon…

        • csh

          Mary …. quit drinking the RINO Kool-Aid…. Ron Paul is NOT an isolationist. That is just the propaganda talking points that the RINOs are throwing out to discredit his “Constitutional” foreign policy. They want an excuse to be at war continually and will create the situation for it, if it isn’t already there. When at war, The president has an excuse to act like a dictator throught the “War Powers Act”. It gives motive to create a BIGGER government, and the only ones winning are the elitists at the top.

          Ron Paul simply requires that we follow “The rule of law”, as our REPUBLIC dictates. There is a constitutional “PROCESS” that we are to go through to ever get to that point of war, and the process was designed for our own good. Our forefathers were brilliant men who understood by experience the devastation of not having certain protections put in writing…. so they did. Read the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence. It won’t take that long. Don’t fall for the lies of the RINOs……. They have slid so far left, that even following the constitution seems unusual for them… and gets in their way of controlling the people. That’s why we need a man who understands and Follows the constitution. The other hypocrites take an oath do do so, but then make a mockery of it.

        • patriotrenegade

          the “young” cannot carry a general election. The problem with the “young” is that they were taught from birth that EVERYTHING they say or do is “wonderful”. It’s NOT WONDERFUL. OR SMART.

          • Willis

            You are “ME GENERATION” incarnate.

          • csh

            You are very wrong is you think Ron Paul is “only” carrying the young. Again you are buying the RINO hype. Yes, he is gaining their votes, as he is gaining votes from all ages, all parties and affiliations, because we all have something in common…. it’s called our Constitution and our Republic, that we are supposed to be living by.

            They all take an oath to uphold it, but then vote against it to our demise. Ron Paul is the only one who has guts enough to vote along constitutional lines to protect our freedom 100% of the time, and has the record to prove it.

            That may not be popular for the RINOs, but it is popular with the people, and the more people are understanding the constitution and our other founding documents, the more they realize that if we don’t get someone in there who will really stand for constitutional principles and for the people, we are over as a free country. The RINOS have sold us out with NAFTA, GATT, The PATRIOT Act, Bailouts….. We are just so done with them.

            That’s why they are trying so hard now to “sound” constitutional…. but don’t buy their campaign speeches …. look at their voting record.

            That’s why Ron Paul will make a great president… he is dedicated to bringing the power back to the people as designed, and making the “federal” part of government more limited again…. as was constitutionally designed.

            That’s important at all ages.

            If you care about your freedom you should be supporting Ron Paul as well… no matter how old you are.

          • Clifford Johnson

            The young people of this “time out” generation are the most spoiled, disgusting generation to have ever lived. They have an entitlement mentality that is beyond the pale. There hubris is only exceeded by their ignorance. Thank God that there are still enough mature people to throttle these jackasses.

        • Morning Star

          Why wouldn’t people vote for a Mormon? They voted for a Muslim didn’t they?

        • RonW

          Willie by the time Nov. gets here. You can trust and believe. Abortion, religion, immigration, and all those other back burner issues will be just that. Back burner issues. It will come down to two choices. Either you are an AMERICAN or you are with THEM.

        • RonW

          Willie by the time Nov. gets here. You can trust and believe. Abortion, religion, immigration, and all those other back burner issues will be just that. Back burner issues. It will come down to two choices. Either you are an AMERICAN or you are with THEM.

      • Randall

        patastain got nukes, we couldn’t stop them, india got nukes we couldn’t stop them, even north korea got nukes and they don’t ever have a economy and we couldn’t stop them. why in the world do you think we could stop iran from getting nukes if they want them??? how silly, none of our business. we give isarel 3 billion a year in forgien aid and give 12 billion a year to isarel’s enemies. that makes sense to you? our deluded policy’s are not making us more secure.

        • Clifford Johnson

          The difference between Pakistan, India, and North Korea is that they do not have a mentality that would cause them to commit mass suicide like Iran. Iran would be willing to sacrifice the lives of everyone in their nation to destroy Israel and kill tens of millions of Americans. They believe that would be an honorable thing to do. They would be martyrs and to them that is their highest honor.

          • Willis

            Clifford “The Military Industrial Complex” Johnson

            We don’t TRUST YOUR TYPE, Cliff.

            We know what you are up to, Cliff.

            Keynesianism is dead, Cliff. The dollar doesn’t work as well because of your type, Cliff.

        • csh

          You are Right On Randall !!! We give all our finances away to other governments and train them militarily, so that they can then turn around later, and use it against us.

          Not only that, but Israel has stated that they don’t even “want” our aid…. that they can defend themselves. They do NOT like the nanny strings that go along with accepting money from us. They want to be Independent, and we should respect that.

          If we came home, and saved our billions of dollars, we would be in better shape to help an ally if “asked”.

      • Andy Miller

        I would trust a darn thing this group puts out.
        Mary by your post You must be on our side!

      • Patricia Martin

        Mary, have you ever heard one of Ron Paul’s speaches or his answers when asked questions in the debates? or ——–are you forming your opinion solely on what you are told by another person or by the media?
        Do your own research, that is, if you are not too lazy!

      • William

        Dear Mary,

        I have taken the courtesy of posting for you as well as anyone else that may be interested some links to very informative articles and videos that will help clear up your misconceptions. Your fears are unfounded.

        The first is a link to the video of the speech Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made before a joint session of the US House and senate in which he went on to say ” We do not need your nation building, we are already built. We do not need you to bring us Democracy, we’ve already got it. We do not need you to send your soldiers to defend us, we defend ourselves.

        http://www.c-span.org/Events/Israeli-Prime-Minister-Addresses-Congress/10737421714-1/

        The second and third are links to Webster’s Definition of “Isolationism” and “Non-Intervention”

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/isolationism

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non-intervention

        The third is a link to a collection of Quotations attributed to Thomas Jefferson. It is my hope to everyone that utilizes this link, gain some insight as to what is really at stake in the coming election.

        Last but not least is a link to Ron Paul’s official Campaign website, so that you may better
        understand the Congressman. This will without a doubt strengthen your arguments against Dr. Paul. Or it may actually reveal to you your misconceptions.

        Thank you for your time and consideration

    • Clifford Johnson

      Look where this article was written–The Huffington Post, the most libiot biased rag on the planet. The Huffington Post would never, under any circumstances, allow any article to be published on their pages that would, in any way, be good for the Republican party. I have never read an article that was more FOS than this article. ron paul is a nut job and a present day Jim Jones and his “followers” are the koolaid drinkers. I can’t wait until this month is over with and ron paul has been effectively eliminated from the race for the Republican nomination. I can’t wait to read the posts from all of the ron paul “followers” when his defeat is finally certain and he is no longer campaigning for the Republican nomination. ron paul may try to play the roll of spoiler by running as a third party candidate, thereby handing the election to Obamler, this would play into the hands of his followers because they are so mean spirited and spiteful that they would vote for this moron knowing full well he would not win the election playing a major part in reelecting the Dummycrat Obamler. I am going to print up bumper stickers and yard signs that say “Vote for ron paul! Reelect Obamler! (This message is supported by the Committee to Reelect the President).

      • Willis

        Clifford “Military Industrial Complex” Johnson.

        We want a STRONG NATIONAL DEFENSE not your your CORPORATE RAPE OF THE YOUNG.

      • RonW

        Nice try Clifford. ABO is non starter. If Doc Paul asked us too. We will not vote the Party line. Just to keep Obama out. Not Gonna happen. Want to know why? Simple fact is. Even if we did and say anyone but Ron Paul wins in NOVEMBER. It still leaves us worse off than we are today. You see. Ron Paul is the only one willing to surgically remove the cancer that is eating away at America’s heart. Its The FED DUMMY! So we will scratch Ron Pauls name into the Computer screen if we have to. End result? Obama wins and the noise from all the whining and its Ron Paul’s ranker will wake up and have more REAL American’s scratching their foggy heads and asking , What the hell is going on? And that will be a win for America. Not the wealthy hidden corrupt ones. It might buy them another for years. But in the long run. 1 then 2 then 3 the 25 then millions will say ENOUGH! WE need more prisons cause we are going to clean house.

    • Millicent

      I see this comes from the left wing Huffington Post. Ron Paul is a vile pile of trash and is anti American. He is even worse than Obama. I tell people all the time about what he has done and said against America. They are coming to despise this dirtbag as much as Obama. I work very hard at exposing this vile evil old goat.

      • Paul

        I’m very disappointed that YOU did not croak over the weekend, hag!

        • Leslie

          I second that Paul, as I was scrolling down the comments and didn’t see Millicents name I started getting excited, and then…. Oh well, I guess if not her then some other troll would be here to take her place.

          • Millicent

            Why don’t you admit you come from OWS. Only trash supports the lowlife pile of offal named Ron Paul

        • Clifford Johnson

          Paul you and ron paul are both vile, disgusting, insane and moronic.

        • Millicent

          Such is the scum that comes from Ron Paul supporters. They even threaten people. You are as low and vile and theat evil old goat Dr. Dementia.

        • Pepper

          Millicent and Clifford are always so polite.

          As polite as vile, disgusting lowlife anti-American steaming piles of offal!

          (hmm… wonder where I heard those nice words before)

          • Willis

            Its the actual voice of the Military Industrial Complex.

            That is what it sounds like.

            Demonic to say the least.

          • American Patriot

            Pepper,
            Milliscents depends are full and leaking again. The stench is about as kosher as it can get with the crap and VD.

      • Robert A L

        Disinformationalist Bull Crap Ron Paul is the only true patriot running in this election or for that matter in any election over the last 50 years. The run are politicians backed by profiteers (like you) who want to cut the prime cuts for themselves rather than build our country back to it’s former strength! Ron Paul vote for him vote with your heart for our great country!

        • patriotrenegade

          oh wow- another 20 yr old bamabot. You can just tell.

        • Roy

          I’m with you fellow countryman

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Hey Millicent, what happened honey, did you misplace your dildo? It’s real simple, just buy another one, you frustrated bag of crap.

      • Ann in Nebraska

        Millicent, as hard as you say you “work very hard at exposing this vile evil old goat”, please be assured I will work twice as hard for Dr. Paul. I am retired and have nothing but time. Lots and lots of time. Dr. Paul is the one to beat because he is the real deal. A lot of my friends are also retired, and they, too, are seeing that Dr. Paul makes way more sense than the rest of the candidates. Our group meets regularly for coffee and almost all of us are going to work for Dr. Paul in one capacity or another – canvassing our neighborhoods, having meetings in our homes, or on the phone. Thanks for keeping me very inspired, Millicent!! Ron Paul 2012!!!!!

        • Millicent

          Guess what, the people I talk to laugh at the idea of this pile of trash getting elected. They see him for what he is. Worse than Obama.

          • Pepper

            Guess what, the people I talk to are laughing at YOU. Is it possible for you to write one sentence without being rude? There is serious doubt.

      • csh

        Millicent ….. I agree that the Huffington Post is usually left wing and I don’t appreciate it most of the time, but then you turn around with your comments and sound just as repugnant. Your name calling against Ron Paul only shows you as the piece of trash you accuse him of being. Unamerican???? He is the ONLY one who stands on the REPUBLIC and its founding documents that recognize the freedoms and independence that Americans are supposed to have.
        If you are against the Constitution, it is then “YOU” that is the vile old goat!

        • Millicent

          Ron Paul has been a serial violater of Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution his whole lackluster career in Congress. He puts in earmarks, then votes against them, knowing the bill will pass. Then the liar says, see I never voted for an earmark. He is #4 on bringing home the bacon. His rants are always against this country. I bet you come from OWS. I would never ever ever in a million years vote for another enemy of the USA. He is worse than Obama

      • RonW

        Millicent = milli centimetre sized brain

        • American Patriot

          RonW,
          Milliscent= intelligence of less then fungus.

    • bob corbe

      If it is Romney i would rather see Ron Paul as nominee. The Republican party brought us McCain and now the loser Romney wich is is bad to he bone.t

    • ANTICRIME

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

      • csh

        AMEN to That!!!! :)

    • Tercel

      Ron Paul is:
      1.) Too old…he said himself he didn’t know if he had the strength to even get through the campaign. POTUS requires carrying the weight of the entire world on his shoulders. Evidenced by the instant gray hair every man gets upon assuming that office.

      2.) His foreign policy is dangerous…Ron Paul is Neville Chamberlin. Look where that got us.

      Ron Paul is not serious about being President. He has said so himself. He just wants to influence the debate which he is doing. His economic policies do merit some debate but legalized drugs, legalized prostitution, doing away with the age of consent, doing away with social security and medicare…are just not going to fly with the bulk of American voters.

      Go ahead and explode Paulbots. But it is just not going to happen! Your wasting your breath.

      • Patricia Martin

        I would like to research what you have just written. I have never, and I mean never, heard any of these things before about Ron Paul. Since I
        am leaning toward Dr. Paul, it is necessary that I find out exactly where he stands on those things that you say he is for. Please let me know where I can find what you are claiming.

        • Pepper

          Good luck with that. Any reference will turn out to be circular.

      • RonW

        I saw that interview and what you don’t see is. Ron Paul Does NOT Sit Around And Drool And Dream About Life In The WhiteHouse And Oval Office. He is running because he really cares about AMERICA and yes even the little peoples of the world at large. He run’s for office because his SENSE OF DUTY Tells him HE HAS NO OTHER CHOICE! What all you nay sayers can’t get past. Is he really is the EVERYREADY BATTERY BUNNY That just keeps on going and going and going. And it is NOT because he WANTS to like all the other wannabe’s. He is the REAL DEAL and Those that like things as they are CAN”T STAND THAT. And he has a secret weapon that NOBODY can take from him. Over time he has got to witness that look of awe and sense of wonder that beams out from a newborn baby’s eyes. Wanting the best for an extended family of that size carry’s with it a lot of grit and support. There is no real way around any of Doc Paul’s economic and or other programs for fixing America. You can try to use fear mongering. But in the end Common Sense will win the day. Everytime he gets interviewed an a mainstream channelI sit around and make bets on how long it will take the interviewer to get around to asking the what if the RNC doe not pick your question? The one when they want to pin him down and commit to not running a third party race and everytime he answers the same. “Its Not My Attention at this point.” That makes them crazy over at the RNC. Because they know he is a man that keeps his word. Let it be known. Doc Paul has no control over how we Paulites and Paulbots Vote. And we will NOT transfer our worked for hard earned powerful votes to the RNC’s chosen controllable lapdog, We are united on this and we are screaming to the heavens NOT THIS TIME!

      • William

        Thanks for posting. Now that we have all had the opportunity to read your mind; please, humor me and use the the links I have posted which refute your positions.

        Ron Paul on his physical condition.

        http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-08-20/ron-paul-76-challenges-status-quo-to-20-mile-bike-race-in-houston-heat/

        http://www.humblelibertarian.com/2011/08/ron-paul-answers-age-question-with-20.html

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBft0EgbZTQ

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPlUnnKLYJk

        Ron Paul on Legalization of drugs and prostitution

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4Eca-INIOw

        Ron Paul on National Defense:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzqpbCcD76o

        Dare to challenge your perceptions.

    • msbets

      All you will get with a vote for Paul…………………..IS OVOMIT BACK FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE!!!

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        You think so, stupid?

    • Mike

      If Ron Paul is so great, then why is it that he has only had one bill passed since he house been in congress. Another words, if has not been able to get anything done in congress, what makes anyone think he will be able to get anything done as president? I think he is to far right to be able to get congress to work with him.

      • Pepper

        So, passing more unconstitutional laws is the mark of success in your mind? His voting record is 100% constitutional, 100% of the time. That’s why none of his bills pass. Congress passes, and the President signs, only unconstitutional bills. That’s the way it works. For now.

      • William

        Here’s the link to a list of the legislation Ron Paul has proposed. His inability to garner support is due to the fact that his proposed legislations would either repeal “anti-personal liberty” legislation already in place or authorize more “personal liberty” legislation returning more power to the American people.

        Don’t give in to the temptation of believing headlines, investigate allegations and insinuations thoroughly before signing on to them.

        I hope you find the info at the link helpful

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_legislation_sponsored_by_Ron_Paul

    • The Texas Cooke

      Message to the RNC: I DON’T INTEND TO HOLD MY NOSE ANYMORE! I am not a socialist. I wasn’t raised in a socialist country. I will not vote for a socialist candidate REGARDLESS OF THE PARTY HE CLAIMS TO REPRESENT. When you ran John McCain, I didn’t leave your party, you left me. I voted for the Constitution Party. If you run Mitt Romney, you will have left me for good. If you want to give Obrain-dead another term, just run another socialist against him. There are other parties that don’t just say what I want to hear, but actually do what they say they will do. Unlike the Republican Party that so far has talked big, but since Reagan, your candidates have left the elections behind, taken an oath, and then continued progressive/socialist policies as though they had never opened their mouths once during their campaigns. You are about to strategize yourselves right out of existence and, believe me, you will not be missed! If the Tea Party made an error in judgment, it was in ever believing that you could be trusted to speak for conservatives.

      • Capt RCG

        If obama gets re-elected (he is the REAL socialist) it will be because of Kool – Aid drinkers who back Paul – the man cannot be elected and his supporters need to realize that – The term ABO (anyone but obama) should be taken seriously. If by some quirk Paul would be nominated I would definitely vote for him – would I vote for him for the nomination no – because I am sure he can’t win either the nomination or be elected POTUS

        • Pepper

          WHEN obama gets reelected it will be because the RNC insists, no matter how hard they get hit upside the head, on foisting Establishment Puppets on us.

          We want the Constitution and freedom, not more puppet shows.

        • RonW

          Capt. You have bailed on the American people too soon. One way or another, Ron Paul will be the next President Of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I think S. Carolina will be the wakeup call for many of you doubters out there. Here is a poll that can be done right this minute. One at a time. Youtube search youtube Just their names. Ron Paul then Mitt Romney. then Newt and so on. Tally the numbers. For and against. Then ask yourself why us Paulbots are so involved and active. Try watching a few there are hundreds it not thousands. I’ve downloaded for safe keeping every one I’ve had the time to watch. Currant count in that folder is. Survey says? 141.

      • csh

        I am of the Tea Party, and don’t believe the rhetoric that there is any one person who represents or can speak for the tea party….. it isn’t really a party in that sense. We are all independent thinkers, but have tried to work with the Republican party. That’s what makes us different.
        That’s why Ron Paul has my support…. before there ever was a “Tea Party” he was already fighting for those constitutional principles that we all long to return to. THe RINOs are killing the party because they have gone so far left it isn’t even recognizable anymore. Ron Paul could help give it a new face because he is not afraid to face the federal government and reighn in its over reaching power grab. He is dedicated to bringing power back to the people and an awareness and respect for our Constitution again.

        • RonW

          Two thumbs up. The RNC does not get the fact that We are AMERICANS first and foremost. And worse yet they haven’t caught on yet that they have lost their way. After South Carolina they may even loose relevance if they choose to ignore the results.

    • Capt RCG

      It is wishful thinking on the part of Paul’s supporters to think he can even come close to being nominated no less elected to POTUS – he had his 15 minutes of fame in the limelight – now he needs to go back to Texas – smoke some more Jimson Weed and stay out of everyone’s hair – his supporters have to realize he is going nowhere in the race – get over it – move on – & vote for whoever gets the nomination and get obama out of office. – So Mote It Be

      • Willis

        Your Logic Is Failing by Willis

        Your logic

        is

        failing.

    • Kenai

      I will not vote for Ron Paul for 2 reasons. 1 his foreign policy is non-existant and 2 he is an anti-Semite. He hates the Jews and is pro- Palestinian. The only way I would vote for him is if he actually was the one to go up against Oblammy…God forbid!

      • csh

        His foreign policy does not have to be non existent…. The RINOs have sure been trying to make it that way though. His foreign policy is a CONSTITUTIONAL one…… you know…. that document that is “supposed” to be at the base of any of our other laws, but has been ignored by the socialist mentality in Washington.

        He is NOT an Anti-Semite….. that is RINO propaganda. He has the most respect from Israel because he “HONORS their own request” to be independent. They don’t even want our involvement, and the prime minister has “said” so. They don’t want the ties that goes with taking our money. They don’t want us as their nanny, and they have stated that they would rather defend themselves.

        We can be a constitutional noninterventionist nation, and still act as an ally upon “REQUEST”. In the meantime we can bring our troops home that is scattered over 130 countries, saving billions, and work on rebuilding our own country and protecting its borders.

      • ANTICRIME

        @Kenai, OF COURSE Ron Paul has a foreign policy based on NON-INTERVENTION IN THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF OTHER NATIONS! ~ The very SAME basic policy of George Washington!
        SHOW us PROOF that Ron Paul “hates the Jews”…or retract your unfounded accusation, my friend!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

      • William

        I have posted a link to refute your position on Ron Paul’s foreign policy. In return I would ask that you post links to substantiate you allegation of antisemitism.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzqpbCcD76o

        I await your reply.

    • Jacob

      I’m glad others are willing to expose the brain-washing ways of the mass media and the special elite that pressure and pay our politicians to make things happen for their benefit. I have known for years now that something had been wrong with today’s media on T.V. I’ve always wondered why the news would show bad things all the time. Then it finally dawned on me that for the government and the elite to gets it’s way they must first find a way to strike fear in our society. No better way than to take a small story and turn it into a “were all doomed” situation to scare Americans into allowing more wars and more police. Then it all was finally confirmed when I began college and took a sociology course which the reinforced the fact that media corporates do infact gate-keep to only allow things into the media that benefit the major corps that support that network. The only way to control people is to devide America into groups which are now Liberals, Replublicans, and Democrats. Once the nation can be devided then America is in great danger. I ask you all to find common ground which is respect everyones civil liberties, rights, and families regardless culture, race, and ethics. Once we can finally come to respect one another and look at everyone as Americans instead of political offiliation, then we will unite and finally begin to rebuild a nation that has begun to devide it self do to media propaganda. The bottom line is Ron Paul stands for true freedom and true freedom and that my friends is what will unite America once again. Ron Paul 2012

      • Steve

        Very good insights, Jacob. Those who castigate the younger generation need to understand that there are very keen insights that are coming from those under 30 that are very critical to the future of this nation.

    • sdhartz

      I am so sorry, but I find any article on the Huffinton Post suspect. I just can’t go there! It surprises me to find a link to HP on Conservative Byte!

    • Richard Wright

      I am eighty six years young, have seen some dumb political policies in my time but, none as stupid as Ron Paul’s isolationist , to hell with the world we live in policy. If, thru his stupidity, our military intelligence agencies and Homeland Security are reduced to a skeleton force to “reducethe debt ,” how long will it be before every enemy of our FREE SOCIETY is at our door steps. Ron Paul is a JOKE. My first awareness of Political Stupidity was Alf Landon. I hope Ron Paul is not my last.

      • Patricia Martin

        86 year old, I have news for you. Ron Paul is NOT an isolationist. He is for letting other countries stand up for themselves and should they need our help, it will be given. Maybe you are a little senile?

    • Cynthia

      Too OLD to serve? Ron Paul rides a bike 12 miles each day. I would strongly suspect that 99% of you couldn’t keep up with him and that he’s in better shape than you in that 99% range.

    • http://www.usaqh.com Sly

      Y’all need to go to townhall.com and read Judge Napolitano’s column ‘What if ?’ …

    • Deb

      Sorry to break it to you but, Soro’s has been funding Ron Paul’s campaign. So, yes indeed, he’s bowing down before Soro. Paul is VERY Dangerous for America as a president. His views about Iran & Muslims is dangerous thinking. They ARE a very real threat to America as well as every other country that is not Muslim. Cutting our Military & Defense will only make us weak & vulnerable. NObama already has begun doing this. With Paul he’d just finish it.~ As it is, Paul has already admitted he’s not committed to winning, just getting his screwed up liberal/tarian views out there.~ The more we learn about what & who he really is, we RUN in the opposite direction~ He’s definitely NOT a Conservative. And before you go claiming we’re ‘brainwashed’ etc, It’s from Ron Paul’s own mouth, that we learn about how dangerous his screwed up thinking is & what a kook he is.

      • Patricia Martin

        What proof do you have that Soro’s is funding his campaign?

      • William

        First things first. Here is Webster’s definition of Conservatism and the link to the page in case you doubt the validity of my posting. I have taken the liberty of doing so because it appears your understanding of that premise may be flawed.

        con·ser·va·tism
        noun \kən-ˈsər-və-ˌti-zəm\
        Definition of CONSERVATISM
        1
        capitalized a : the principles and policies of a Conservative party b : the Conservative party
        2
        a : disposition in politics to preserve what is established b : a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (as retirement income or health-care coverage)
        3
        : the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism

        Anyone have with actual knowledge of Ron Paul’s campaign, having read the above definition can not deny that Ron Paul’s policies clearly define him as a conservative.

        Next, a link to Ron Paul’s actual position on Nation Defense.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzqpbCcD76o

        Finally, I would ask that you substantiate your assertion that George Soros is funding Ron Paul’s campaign.

    • MSGT JOHN CORREA

      After careful research of all U.S. Presidential Candidates; I found Dr. Ron Paul to be a genuine American patriot. As I mentioned earlier; U.S. Presidential Candidate Ron Paul speaks more about saving America and our U.S. Constitution than any other candidate. And this concerns me greatly because it is extremely important for most American patriots to have this sovereign nation restored back to its greatness.

      Borrowing a passage from ‘Americans United For Freedom;’ “One of the most fundamental characteristics of our Republic is the Separation of Powers among the three separate branches of government. The checks and balances in the American system were instituted for the ‘express’ purpose of combating the rise of a tyrannical and oppressive government.” Tyranny and oppression began when the foreign-born agent conquered the White House, and both U.S. became infested with communists.

      These are the exact checks and balance the foreign-born Muslim Communist dictator and illegal U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama II is currently and desperately trying to destroy at this very moment with the hope that Congress will be caught with their guard down by ignoring their constituents. That is … “We the People!”

      If Congress ignors their constituents and allow passage of Obama’s request for total authoritarianism; this will place all branches of government under ‘King Obama ‘s rule with the termination of the United States Constitution. And so, our sovereign Republic will be no more the America we once knew.

      Instead of concentrating on the election, we should all be shouting and demanding for the immediate arrest of the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II and charge him under the catagory of ‘espionage’ since he was a plant orchestrated by ACORN (A KNOWN COMMUNIST ORGANIZATION) that was monitarily supported with illegal donations from foreign countries, for which, we knowingly allowed them to get away with all forms of frauds. Again, I shall repeat what is the truth; Americans left their country unguarded.

      There is absolutely no reason why the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II shouldn’t be arrested for ‘espionage.’ ‘Nothing’ will change in America until “We the people” clean out the rodent infested Washington, DC area of all liberal socialists communists. As I mentioned earlier, both U.S. Houses are infested with self proclaimed members of the ‘Democratic Socialists of America’ whom in reality are Communists. Why beat around the bush when we know darn well that they are indeed communists. It’s who they really are.

      Demand that the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II be immediately arrested under the catagory of ‘espionage’ whose intent was to destroy our Republic from within; and that certainly falls under the catagory of ‘espionage’ for a foreign-born agent. Later we can purge members of both U.S. Houses by charging them with ‘High Treason’ for their attempt in the overthrow of the United States Government and its Constitution.

      God bless America!

      MSGT JOHN CORREA
      USAF (RET)

      • ANTICRIME

        The PROBLEM lies in the fact that Obama falls within the JURISDICTION of the U.S. Justice Dept, a branch of which is the FBI whose responsibility and DUTY is to investigated federal crimes and effect arrests. ~ Once they have made the arrest then it is up to the FEDERAL COURTS to try federal crimes!

        Bottom Line: The three previous “Progressive” Administrations placed THEIR “appointments” within these strategic locations to make Obama UNTOUCHABLE! ~ UNTIL JUSTICE returns, criminals will remain in charge of our country….UNTIL THE STATES STOP THEM!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

        • MSGT JOHN CORREA

          Anticrime, you are absolutely right. I had written a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in regards to the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II, only for my letter to be completely ignored.

          If the late Director of the FBI J. Edgar Hoover were alive today, I guarantee the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II would have been arrested for ‘espionage’ along with his co-conspirator, U.S. Senator Joe Biden, including massive arrests of leading communist members of ACORN for conspiracy in the overthrow of the United States Government and other serious fraudulent crimes.

          MSGT JOHN CORREA
          USAF (RET)

    • Eliz

      If Ron Paul wins I will not vote for him. I am vote mostly for Republians but consider myself a Libertarian. I like some things Ron Paul stands for but he sounds like a fool when he gets too much time to talk. I would vote for anyone else.

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        Cognitive Dissonance much?

      • William

        He has been criticized for talking over peoples heads.

        It seems the average American has had difficulty comprehending his definitions of his objectives. Which is no fault of his own.

        Please look back to the 2007 debates, you will be unable to not notice the difference in his deliveries.

        I fear it may be out of necessity.

    • Gerr i Staffiery

      Ron Paul is a good man with good intentions. I agree with most of his domestic policies, but when it comes to the international, that’s when it gets scary. He believes Iran should have weapons of mass distruction if they want them and with a dictator in power that is a mad man who wants the distruction of Isreal and the USA, we can’t have a president who is an isolationist.

    • http://www.BornAgainHeathens.com Tim Hays

      The mentality that says, “anyone but Obama” puts Ron Paul in the camp of anyone. I am sad that Bachmann could not gain anymore support than she did, I liked her, and trusted her character. Those that remain standing except Ron Paul are all from the left side of the GOP. Ron Paul will turn the ship of state 180 degrees, back toward a constitutional republic. The best we can expect from Romney, Newt, Perry or Santorum is going slower into the abyss of Big Government, Big Brother, Big Debt, Big Fed Reserve, and a funeral pyre for our dead republic. Reluctantly, I have no other choice but to support Ron Paul, and pray for the man’s safety.

      • ANTICRIME

        Tim, Sorry, but Bachmann showed her unreliability when she voted to extend the unconstitutional “Patriot Act”, my friend! ~ Dr. Paul, having more wisdom, voted against it!

    • C.C.

      Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid
      ________________________________________
      Radical Leftists Don’t Have to Have Kids…
      They Can Steal Ours
      Many people assume that this generation of young Americans is much like any other.
      But thanks to the radical left, they’re not even close.
      In Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid, Hicks exposes how the Left’s relentless attacks on America’s character and culture have finally succeeded, and are ushering in the first authentically socialist generation of Americans who believe they are entitled to a lifetime of government care.
      There is a frightening percentage of our kids who believe that:
      • Socialism is better than the free market
      • Christianity is judgmental, and just plain mean
      • America is the villain of world history
      • We all need the government to take care of us
      We can’t maintain the kind of system our Founders built for us without the kind of people who built it. Period.
      “You don’t have to be a parent to be concerned. In fact, the result of this campaign to indoctrinate our nation’s youth will affect every one of us, regardless of our family status,” warns Hicks.
      All is not lost though. We can break the Left’s hypnotic spell, says Hicks, and Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid shows you how.

      VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY – He will put God, our Flag, and Constitution back into our schools. He will have our schools teach the work ethic to our children and how to be proud of our America!

      • ANTICRIME

        @C.C., AND WHAT “Kool Aid” have YOU been indulging on, my friend?! ~ Mitt Romney would make an ideal used-car salesman, for certain! He votes against any pro-Second Amendment legislation, promotes socialized health care and is a proponent of BIG GOVERNMENT….not to mention being a RINO for the Globalists!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • C.C.

      Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid
      Radical Leftists Don’t Have to Have Kids…
      They Can Steal Ours
      Many people assume that this generation of young Americans is much like any other.
      But thanks to the radical left, they’re not even close.
      In Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid, Hicks exposes how the Left’s relentless attacks on America’s character and culture have finally succeeded, and are ushering in the first authentically socialist generation of Americans who believe they are entitled to a lifetime of government care.
      There is a frightening percentage of our kids who believe that:
      • Socialism is better than the free market
      • Christianity is judgmental, and just plain mean
      • America is the villain of world history
      • We all need the government to take care of us
      We can’t maintain the kind of system our Founders built for us without the kind of people who built it. Period.
      “You don’t have to be a parent to be concerned. In fact, the result of this campaign to indoctrinate our nation’s youth will affect every one of us, regardless of our family status,” warns Hicks.
      All is not lost though. We can break the Left’s hypnotic spell, says Hicks, and Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid shows you how.

      VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY – He will put God, our Flag, and Constitution back into our schools. He will have our schools teach the work ethic to our children and how to be proud of our America!

      • Willis

        Sounds like you still want a “king” here on earth. To right all the wrongs.

        I agree that the liberal agenda is grinding down the youth. That’s why people should want to limit the government interference in all parts of our lives. Not elect your guy so he can “right the wrongs” in dictatorial manner.

        How about lets get back to constitutional government.

    • Average Joe

      What I’m sick to death over is the fact that my grand dauther owes over 40 thousand dollors of the goverments debt. Shes 3 years old and is just starting to figure out what penneys are good for.

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        Yes, you are right. Since the Federal Reserve was established, our money has lost 98% of its value. This is unconscionable and criminal. Yet they just keep printing more.

    • JoJo

      Ron Paul can win, even Jim DeMint says to LISTEN to Ron Paul because most of what he says makes sense, but unfortunately, a good portion of his followers are acting like the OWS crowd which is a major turn off to a lot of people (I count myself amongst this group). Paul has a lot to say and the vast majority of it I agree with, and it’s really annoying that there is no compromise area with the so-called Ron Paul worshippers. It’s almost like Obama worship.

    • Esek Hopkins

      Paul is too old to run. If elected, he will keel over within a year due to the rigors of the office and, for that reason alone, he can not win. Let the next President appoint him as Chairman of the the Fed and allow Paul to while away his few remaining years dismantling the Fed.

    • Gabriel

      “He’s 100% better than Romney who is a DemonRat in an elephant suit. ”

      And Paul is a wacko in a regular-person suit instead of a straight jacket. He’s a pretender too. Romney would be a disaster, but Paul’s foreign policy would be more damaging than Obama’s. I started with Paul near the middle of my list of Republican candidates, and he’s since dropped below Romney. I actually had to make room down there because Romney started out at rock bottom. Good Lord, how can people be taking him seriously? Well, in a country that elected Barack Obama, what should I expect? Someone spews some catchy stuff that sounds good, and people don’t feel the need to think any farther. RonPaul supporters are just as bad as the Obama worshippers who have caused so much harm to this nation…

    • Pat

      The Dems have absolutely nothing to brag about, so their only option is to smear and lie about the opposition…and while they are tarring and feathering Paul, Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, it detracts the news away from things like Fast and Furious, the 11 new “Solyndras”, the constant assaults on our Constitutional rights, etc. etc.

    • Bill Dion

      Ron Paul is 76 years young, but he is in better shape then most of you 30 year olds, he rides a bicycle for exercise, and goes for long walks. obuma and rumny are out to make this country into a one nation under the UN and also are trying to take your guns away. Thats right, rumney already made strict laws in mass for gun control (which is why there is so much violence and death in mass). and obuma is trying to do away with American Citizens being armed to protect this nation from corrupt congress, thieves, cops and rabid animals, and also is trying to get this nation to be under control by the united nations, one government to control all, if you think I am kidding then you haven’t been listening to clinten and obumas speeches. Ron Paul is the only one that is pro US Constitution. All the rest want us to be socialists or arms free. Wake the f**k up and see the light at the end of the tunnel. No arms means no freedom, no Constitution, no voting, no speaking of God at all, no Merry Christmas, no In God We Trust, no prayers by our soldiers because of the UCMJ, and the list goes on. so you had better want to speak Spanish or Chinese of some other foreign language if you vote the wrong person in.

    • Corey

      So, we should stop listening to the lying mainstream media about not voting for Ron Paul, but we should listen to The Huffington Post, one of the most liberal media outlets there is on why we should? Ron Paul fans are much like the mainstream liberal media, they turn a deaf ear and blind eye to the truth about their leader. At least two of the six points made in the story have been shown to be the exact opposite of what is said. He does believe in isolationism and he does not make sense in the debates if you have ever heard him speak.

      Go ahead and vote for him if you choose, but don’t let the liberal media fool you into voting for their choice of republican candidate!

    • Alden Wayne Dumas

      ‎101 Reasons to Vote for Ron Paul

      Submitted by Staff on Mon, 2008-02-04 17:13.Humor
      Presidential Election
      Ron Paul

      [Okay, some of these are complete place fillers, but there are a good 30 plus in here. --MJ]

      1. He Supports the Constitution.
      2. He Believes In Religious Freedom.
      3. He Has Never Voted For A Tax Increase.
      4. He Is Against Public Funding Of Abortion.
      5. He Is Against Funding Abortion Abroad.
      6. He Is Against The National I.D. or Real I.D. Act.
      7. He Believes In The “Just War Theory”.
      8. He Supports The Rights Of Private Property Owners
      9. He Wants Us Out Of The U.N.
      10. He Wants US To Trade With Nations And Not War With Them.
      11. He Is For 2nd Amendment Rights.
      12. He Opposes NAIS.
      13. He Wants To Shrink The Federal Government, Not Expand It.
      14. He Has No Plans To Start A War With Iran Or Anyone Else.
      15. He Wants To Bring Our Troops Home.
      16. He Does Not Belong To The CFR (Council On Foreign Relations).
      17. He Has Not Received Campaign Contributions From Rupert Murdoch (Like Hillary).
      18. His Running Mate Most Likely Will Not Have Shot Anyone In The Face.
      19. He Wants To End The I.R.S., BATFE, and Federal Reserve.
      20. He Wants To Cut Spending.
      21. He Is Against Eminent Domain.
      22. He Is Against The NAFTA Superhighway.
      23. He Is Against The North American Union Or SPP (It Exists Google It).
      24. He Is For The Principle Of Sound Money.
      25. He Is Against The Idea of The Amero (Google It).
      26. He Is Against The Federal Reserve’s Monopoly On Monetary Regulation.
      27. He Is Philosophically Opposed To Big Government.
      28. He Voted Against The Misnamed Patriot Act That Stripped Us Of Our Rights.
      29. He Is For The Bill Of Rights.
      30. He Knows The Meaning Of Liberty.
      31. He Was 1 Of 4 People That Supported Reagan Early On.
      32. He Has Been Married For 50 Years, Which Is An Achievement These Days.
      33. He Is Not Married To Hillary.
      34. His Supporters Love Him.
      35. He Is A Once In A Lifetime Candidate.
      36. Because His Record Is Consistent.
      37. He Is Against Funding The So-Called War On Drugs (Another Unsuccessful War).
      38. He Is Actually Against Funding Many Unsuccessful Federal Programs.
      39. He Does Not Want To Ruin Healthcare By Nationalizing It, (Like Hillary, Obama, et al.)
      40. He Is A Student Of History.
      41. He Votes In Accordance With The Constitution.
      42. He Will Not Forcibly Implant Us Or Our Troops With Microchips Or Like Devices (It’s For Your Safety, Of Course).
      43. He Is The Only Conservative, In The Traditional Sense, Left.
      44. Republicans Love Him Because He Is For Small Government.
      45. Democrats Love Him Because He Will End The War For Oil.
      46. Libertarians Love Him Because He Wants The Government Out Of Their Business.
      47. He Is The Only Electable Republican Candidate.
      48. He is Against The Creation Of A Surveillance Society (See London).
      49. He Supports Homeschool Rights.
      50. He Wants To End The Corporate Welfare System That Is Destroying Our Government’s Credibility.
      51. He Tells It Like It Is. He Is Truthful.
      52. He Reads.
      53. As A Doctor, He Is Informed On The Healthcare Issue.
      54. He Has Not Been Hannitized.
      55. He Has The Courage To Speak Out Against What Is Wrong.
      56. He Will Be Good For The Economy (Freedom Is Generally Good For The Economy).
      57. He Wants Us Out Of The WTO And Like Organizations.
      58. The I.R.S. Is Scared Of This Guy.
      59. He Is Smart Enough To Prefer Gold Over Paper.
      60. He Knows The Term FIAT-CURRENCY and knows what it means.
      61. He Wants To Secure Our Borders.
      62. He Favors Guarding Our Country Over Policing The World.
      63. He Opposed The War In Iraq From The Beginning.
      64. He Authorized The Hunt For Osama Bin Laden.
      65. He Believes Local Governments Are Better Suited To Handle Their Own Issues.
      66. He Is Willing To Listen And Reason With Others.
      67. He Is A Christian Who Believes Christ Was Right When He Said, “Blessed Are The Peacemakers”.
      68. He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
      69. He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
      70. He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
      71. He has never taken a government-paid junket.
      72. He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
      73. He voted against regulating the Internet.
      74. He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
      75. He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
      76. He Is Against Selective Service Registration.
      77. He Is Against A Mandatory Draft.
      78. He Is Still Not Married To Hillary.
      79. He Has The Support Of The Youth.
      80. His Campaign Has People Across The Country Motivated.
      81. His Supporters Are Enthusiastic.
      82. He Is Educated.
      83. He Wants To Apply The Golden Rule In Government (How Radical).
      84. He Believes in Freedom Of Speech.
      85. He Believes In Individual Rights
      86. He Believes Those Rights Come From Our Creator.
      87. He Does Not “Move With The Herd”.
      88. He Has Delivered Over 4,000 Babies And Values Life.
      89. He Doesn’t Have To “Act The Part” Because He Is What He Is.
      90. He Has Not Waffled On The Abortion Issue As Every Other Republican Candidate.
      91. He Has Faced Tremendous Opposition With Dignity.
      92. He Is Optimistic
      93. He Values The Traditions That Have Kept Us Free.
      94. He Understands That Monopolies Are Bad Things.
      95. He Understands The Difference Between Individual And Government Responsibility.
      96. He Understands Inflation Is Not Just The Prices Going Up, But Rather The Value Of Money Going Down.
      97. You Will Feel Good About Your Vote For A Change.
      98. You Will Know You Have Done The Right Thing.
      99. For The First Time In A Long Time, You Will Not Be Voting “For The Least Worst”.
      100. You Will Help Undo The Damage Done To Our Country Over The Last Several Decades.
      101. He Is Our Last Hope For A Free

    • lawrence due

      ron paul sat on a committee with barney frank and of the 14 members 11 were tied directly to soros. obama just revealed that plan last week. a ron paul endorsed plan to destroy the military. that ron paul got from soros.

      • William

        Post your sources for substantiation or retract.

    • arpiem

      I see he now has the support of the Huff and Puff Post, as well as some radical white supremacist groups such as Stormfront. That tells me a lot about this senator who has done nothing in 23 years. His supporters think he will suddenly start doing something if elected president. He has introduced one bill in all that time that had nothing to do with his crazy beliefs.

      • William

        Your post is unsupported. My reply refutes it.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_legislation_sponsored_by_Ron_Paul

        Foreign policy
        [edit] Nonintervention

        Kosovo, 1999–2000: Prohibits the Department of Defense from using troops in Kosovo unless specifically authorized by law.[2]
        Constitutional War Powers Resolution of 2001. H.J.Res. 27, 2001-03-06. Repeals the 1973 War Powers Resolution entirely, prohibiting presidents from initiating a war without a formal declaration of war by Congress.[3] Ron Paul did not sponsor or co-sponsor this.
        Iraq Resolution declaration of war. Motion in re H.J.Res. 114, 2002-10-02. In order to prevent Congress from yielding its Constitutional authority to declare war to the executive branch, which does not Constitutionally hold that power, gives Congress the opportunity to declare war on Iraq, rather than merely “authorizing” the president to deploy forces without a declaration of war.[4] Paul said that he would not vote for his own motion, but that if his fellow members of Congress wished to go to war in Iraq, they should follow the Constitution and declare war.
        Iran and Syria: H.Con.Res. 43, 2007-01-23. Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should implement Recommendation 9 of the Iraq Study Group Report. Urges the President to implement Recommendation 9 of the Iraq Study Group Report, recommending direct diplomatic engagement with Iran and Syria toward constructive results.
        Sunset of Public Law 107-243 Act of 2007. H.R. 2605, 2007-06-07. Establishes a sunset clause for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002. As one of six Republicans to vote against the Iraq Resolution (which authorized military force for stated purposes without declaring war), Paul also inspired the founding of a group called the National Peace Lobby Project to promote a resolution he and Oregon representative Peter DeFazio sponsored to repeal the war authorization in February 2003. His speech, 35 “Questions That Won’t Be Asked About Iraq”,[5] was translated and published in German, French, Russian, Italian, and Swiss periodicals before the Iraq War began.[6]
        Constitutional War Powers Amendments of 2007. H.J.Res. 53, 2007-09-25 (cosponsor). Replaces the 1973 War Powers Resolution with law ensuring the “collective judgment of both the Congress and the President” in use of war powers.

        [edit] International organizations
        Further information: United States withdrawal from the United Nations

        American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009. H.R. 1146, 2009-02-24, originally H.R. 1146, 1997-03-20. Ends U.S. participation and membership in the United Nations and its activities.
        World Trade Organization, 1999-2000: Withdraws U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization.[2]

        The American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009 (ASRA) is U.S. House of Representatives bill 1146 (H.R. 1146) of the first session of the 111th Congress, “to end membership of the United States in the United Nations” (U.N.). The bill was first introduced on March 20, 1997, as H.R. 1146, to the first session of the 105th Congress (the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 1997); it was a legislative effort to remove the U.S. from the UN.[7] Paul reintroduced the bill on February 24, 2009[8]

        The bill was authored by Ron Paul to effect U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. It would repeal various laws pertaining to the U.N., terminate authorization for funds to be spent on the U.N., terminate U.N. presence on U.S. property, and withdraw diplomatic immunity for U.N. employees.[9] It would provide up to two years for the U.S. to withdraw.[10] The Yale Law Journal cited the Act as proof that “the United States’s complaints against the United Nations have intensified.”[11]

        In a letter to Majority Leader Tom DeLay of April 16, 2003,[12] and in a speech to Congress on April 29, Paul requested the repeatedly-bottlenecked issue be voted on, because “Americans deserve to know how their representatives stand on the critical issue of American sovereignty.”[13] Though he did not foresee passage in the near future, Paul believed a vote would be good for “those who don’t want to get out of the United Nations but want to tone down” support; cosponsor Roscoe Bartlett’s spokeswoman similarly said Bartlett “would welcome any action that would begin the debate”.[12]

        It had 54 supporters in the House in its first year.[7] It was referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and was never released for a vote.

        National Review cited the ASRA as an example of grassroots effort “to educate the American people about the efforts of foreign tyrants to disarm them”.[14] Supporters approved of its intent to end financial ties to the UN, its peace-keeping missions, and its building in New York City.[15] A report by Herbert W. Titus, Senior Legal Advisor of the Liberty Committee, concluded that “the American Sovereignty Restoration Act is the only viable solution to the continued abuses of the United Nations.”[16]

        On its front page, the Victoria, Texas, Advocate, a newspaper in Paul’s district, expressed pride for the Act in the face of what it called several undeclared “United Nations wars”.[17]

        Henry Lamb considers it “the only way to be sure that the U.S. will win the showdown at the U.N. Corral”, considering that without withdrawal, U.N. claims of diplomatic immunity and Congressional subpoena power threaten each other, as in the oil-for-food scandal.[10]

        Critics say it “undoubtedly paints a bull’s-eye across the entire country”.[18] Tim Wirth, president of the United Nations Foundation, finds the bill contrary to United States interests: “This piece of legislation has been brought by Ron Paul every year over the last 20 [sic] years and it never goes anywhere.”[12]

        A policy review of U.S.–Canada relations describes the Act as reflecting “extreme views,” but indicative of a majority pro-sovereignty view in Congress, expressed in tighter border and immigration policy, unilateralism in foreign policy, and increased national security focus.[19]

        Similar U.S. legislation includes Ron Paul’s proposal to end U.S. contributions to the United Nations and affiliated agencies, which had Republican support but failed as an appropriations amendment by a vote of 74;[20] and Roscoe Bartlett’s proposal to cut a $100 million payment to the U.N., based on General Accounting Office claims that the U.S. has overpaid by $3.5 billion (the UN claimed that it was owed $1.3 billion).[21]

        The 2002 Republican Party of Texas platform explicitly urged passage of the ASRA; withdrawal from the U.N. had been on the platform at least since 1998.[22]

        Both houses of the Arizona legislature introduced legislation petitioning Congress to pass the ASRA (HCM 2009 in 2004, SCM 1002 in 2006);[23][24] in 2007 similar legislation passed the Arizona Senate (SCM 1002 in 2007), but with the focus changed from the ASRA to Virgil Goode’s Congressional resolution not to engage in a NAFTA Superhighway or a North American Union (H.Con.Res. 487, now H.Con.Res. 40).[25][26]

        The John Birch Society recognizes the ASRA as a reflection of its efforts since 1962 toward U.S. withdrawal.[7] Their publication New American sees Nathan Tabor’s anti-U.N. book, The Beast on the East River, as a building block toward ASRA passage,[27] which it advocates because “the U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations.”[28]

        In 2000, Tom DeWeese’s American Policy Center said it delivered to Congress more than 300,000 signatures from petitions in support of the Act.[29]

        An organization calling itself the Liberty Committee also organized a nationwide petition drive asking Majority Leader Tom DeLay to schedule the bill for a vote.[30]
        [edit] Borders and immigration

        Terror Immigration Elimination Act of 2007. H.R. 3217, 2007-07-27, originally H.R. 488, 2003-01-29. Limits the issuance of student and diversity immigrant visas in relation to Saudi Arabia, countries that support terrorism, and countries not cooperating fully with United States antiterrorism efforts.
        Birthright citizenship: H.J.Res. 46, 2007-06-13, originally H.J.Res. 46, 2005-04-28. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to deny United States citizenship to individuals born in the United States to parents who are neither United States citizens nor persons who owe permanent allegiance to the United States. Clarifies the Fourteenth Amendment in accord with Paul’s opposition to birthright citizenship.
        Trans-Texas Corridor: H.R. 5191, 2008-01-29. To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out the highway project known as the “Trans-Texas Corridor”.

        [edit] Terrorism

        Police Security Protection Act. H.R. 3304, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 1410, 1997-04-23 (Law Officer’s Armor Vest Tax Credit Act of 1997). Creates tax credit for law enforcement officers who purchase armor vests.
        Anti-Terrorism Act of 2007. H.R. 3305, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 2896, 2001-09-14. Proposed immediately after the September 11, 2001, attacks, permits pilots and navigators of aircraft, and law enforcement personnel detailed to aircraft, to carry firearms.
        Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007. H.R. 3216, 2007-07-27. To authorize the President to issue letters of marque and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and other similar acts of war planned for the future.

        [edit] Economy
        [edit] Taxes

        Tax Free Tips Act of 2009. H.R. 779, 2009-01-28, originally H.R. 4408, 1998-08-05. Provides that tips shall not be subject to income or employment taxes.
        Public Safety Tax Cut Act. H.R. 3303, 2007-08-01, originally H.R. 3124, 1999-10-21. Creates tax credit for police officers and professional firefighters, and makes public safety volunteer benefits nontaxable.
        Cost of Government Awareness Act of 2007. H.R. 3601, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 4855, 2000-07-13. Eliminates employer withholding tax and replaces it with monthly installment payment of income tax by employees, finding that withholding taxes are inherently deceptive and unfair and that they “hide the true cost of government from taxpayers, making tax increases more feasible”.
        Taxpayers’ Freedom of Conscience Act of 2009. H.R. 1233, 2009-02-26, originally H.R. 1548, 2003-04-01. To prohibit any Federal official from expending any Federal funds for any population control or population planning program or any family planning activity.
        Property tax: H.R. 4293, 2007-12-05, originally H.R. 5860, 2006-07-20. Creates income tax deduction for real property taxes.
        Abolition of income tax: H.J.Res. 23, 2007-02-07. Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in competition with its citizens. Repeals the Sixteenth Amendment, income tax, estate tax, and gift tax, and limits the government only to Constitutionally authorized enterprises. Paul had proposed similar legislation in 1999-2000 and in 2001.[2]
        Lutetium oxide: H.R. 962, 2009-02-10, originally H.R. 3731, 2007-10-02. To suspend temporarily the duty on lutetium oxide, an ingredient in laser crystals.
        Tax Relief for Transportation Workers Act. H.R. 1097, 2009-02-13, originally H.R. 5991, 2008-05-07. To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for obtaining transportation worker identification credentials.

        [edit] Inflation

        Affordable Gas Price Act. H.R. 2415, 2007-05-21, originally H.R. 4004, 2005-10-06. To reduce the price of gasoline by allowing for offshore drilling, eliminating Federal obstacles to constructing refineries and providing incentives for investment in refineries, suspending Federal fuel taxes when gasoline prices reach a benchmark amount, and promoting free trade.
        Make No Cents Until It Makes Sense Act. H.R. 4127, 2007-11-08. To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the further minting of 1-cent coins until the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System certify in writing that there is not a surplus of 1-cent coins already available for use in transactions, and for other purposes. The U.S. Mint currently spends $.014, which is more than the face value, for each copper-clad zinc U.S. cent it produces.[31] Paul joked, “We can’t even afford a zinc standard anymore.”[32]

        [edit] Sound money/Federal Reserve

        Coinage Act of 1983. Called for new legal-tender gold and silver coins. Ahead of its time, this Act anticipated the successful Gold Bullion Coin Act of 1985, which led to the minting of American Gold Eagles.[32]
        Gold standard, 1983: Attempted to reinstate the gold standard.[32]
        Coinage legislation, 1984: Sought to require Congressional approval of any new coinage and paper money designs, and formal retention of all test notes from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.[32]
        Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act. H.R. 833, 2009-02-03, originally H.R. 1148, 1999-03-17. Abolishes the Federal Reserve Board and its banks and repeals the Federal Reserve Act.
        Honest Money Act. H.R. 2756, 2007-06-15, originally H.R. 2779, 2003-07-17. Repeals 31 U.S.C. 5103, the legal tender law that currently mandates acceptance of Federal Reserve notes as legal tender, in accord with hard money policy.
        Sunshine in Monetary Policy Act. H.R. 2754, 2007-06-15, originally H.R. 4892, 2006-03-07. Requires the Federal Reserve Board to continue to publish the M3 monetary aggregate on a weekly basis. The Federal Reserve ceased publishing M3 statistics as of March 23, 2006, explaining that it costs a lot to collect the data but does not provide significantly useful information.[33]
        Free Competition in Currency Act of 2007. H.R. 4683, 2007-12-13. Strikes sections 486 and 489 of title 18, United States Code, due to “prosecutorial abuse”.[34] The Code sections effectively restrict private minting, and were cited by the FBI as justification for its November 2007 raid of Liberty Services, and its seizure of property allegedly including nearly two tons of precious metals and copper — much of which had been independently minted by Liberty Services with Paul’s image.[35] Paul commented, “If we don’t do something about the dollar, the market will. I would like to legalize competition in currency.”[32]
        Tax-Free Gold Act of 2008. H.R. 5427, 2008-02-13. To provide that no tax or fee may be imposed on certain coins and bullion. Prohibits taxation on gold, silver, platinum, palladium, or rhodium bullion and transactions, and state taxation on gold and silver legal tender currencies and instruments in interstate or foreign commerce.
        Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009. H.R. 1207, 2009-02-26. To reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported. Ensures the audit results are available to Congress,[36] and includes the Fed’s “discount window”, its funding facilities, its open market operations, and its agreements with foreign bankers.[37] Proponents state that the Fed has never been audited by Congress since the Fed’s creation in 1913.[38][39] The Federal Reserve states that “the financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Board of Governors are audited annually by an independent outside auditor.”[40] Paul says that the present audit process exempts the Fed’s “most crucial activities”.[41]

        Significant advocacy for the Transparency Act has ensued. At a rally in Bloomington, Indiana, outside the office of Baron Hill (D-IN), a Young Americans for Liberty petition encouraging Hill to vote in favor of the bill circulated among a crowd of 200; Hill did not comment to YAL, according to member Meredith Milton.[42] The advocacy group Campaign for Liberty (CFL) encourages members to petition representatives to cosponsor the Transparency Act,[43] sponsoring hundreds of pro-bill rallies in cities like Boone, North Carolina;[44] Peoria, Illinois;[45] Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;[46] and (CFL regional conference) St. Louis, Missouri.[47]

        Glenn Beck of Fox News mentioned the Transparency Act while discussing ways for the average person to remind Congress, “Hey, you work for me”.[48] During Beck’s April 15 show from his rally at the Alamo in San Antonio, Pat Gray interviewed a local supporter of the Transparency Act, drawing cheers from the crowd.[49] A blogger on The Motley Fool website called the bill “the first attempt at a true audit of the Federal Reserve since its inception in 1913″ and affirmed Paul’s Congressionally published column describing his legislation.[50][51]

        Federal Reserve Sunshine Act of 2009. H.R. 1348, 2009-03-05. Requires the Federal Reserve to publish information on financial assistance provided to various entities during the bailout of 2008; creates a website listing all banks that have borrowed from the Fed since March 24, 2008, and the amount, terms, and “specific rationale” of the loans. U.S. Senate sponsor Bernie Sanders (I-VT) commented, “I have a hard time understanding how you have put $2.2 trillion at risk without making those names available.” Fed chair Ben Bernanke had told Sanders that publishing the names would make the banks feel stigmatized and potentially reluctant to borrow further.[36]

        [edit] Social Security

        Social Security earnings limit repeal (cosponsor): Repealed the earnings limitation on Social Security. Seniors now continue working after retirement without being penalized.
        Social Security Beneficiary Tax Reduction Act. H.R. 161, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 2723, 1997-10-23. Repeals the 1993 increase in taxes on Social Security benefits.
        Social Security Preservation Act of 2009. H.R. 219, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 219, 1999-01-06, cosponsored since H.R. 857, 1997-02-27. Invests the Social Security surplus “trust funds” in marketable interest-bearing obligations and certificates of deposit, essentially insuring the integrity of the surplus.[2]
        Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act. H.R. 162, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 4790, 2002-05-22, cosponsored since H.R. 761, 1999-02-12. Makes Social Security and Railroad Retirement Board payments nontaxable.
        Social Security for Americans Only Act of 2009. H.R. 160, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 489, 2003-01-29. Limits Social Security benefits to U.S. citizens and nationals.

        [edit] Constitutional rights
        [edit] Freedom of religion

        Religious Freedom Amendment. H.J.Res. 78, 1997-05-08 (cosponsor). Clarifies the “right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience” to include the right of prayer in public schools and other public property, and to prohibit state establishment of religion or requirements to participate in prayer.
        Hostettler amendment (Ten Commandments display): H.Amdt. 278, 2005-06-15 (voted in favor), amending H.R. 2862, 2005-06-10. Defunds the southern Indiana U.S. District Court judgment Russelburg v. Gibson County, which had directed the removal of a Ten Commandments display on the county courthouse lawn.[52] The district judge later reversed himself, holding that the Indiana display met the Supreme Court of the United States’s test described in Van Orden v. Perry, handed down two weeks after the Hostettler amendment.[53]
        See We the People Act.

        [edit] Freedom of association

        National ID (amendment): Prohibited funding for national identification numbers.[2]
        Identity Theft Prevention Act of 2009. H.R. 220, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 220, 1999-01-06 (Freedom and Privacy Restoration Act). Protects Social Security number confidentiality, prohibits uniform national identifying numbers, and prohibits imposition of federal identification standards.
        TV Consumer Freedom Act. H.R. 3602, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 1078, 1999-03-11. Requires consent for signal retransmission, eliminates must-carry requirements, terminates Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates for television features and functions, and clarifies retransmission rights of satellite carriers.
        Freedom to Bank Act. H.R. 1419, 2009-03-10, originally H.R. 6297, 2006-09-29. Ends laws and regulations which deny decision-making opportunities and communication control to bank account holders. States in its long title that such laws “treat the American people like children”.

        [edit] Right to keep and bear arms

        Second Amendment Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 1096, 2007-02-15, originally H.R. 2721, 1997-10-23. Defends law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights to own firearms.
        National Park Second Amendment Restoration and Personal Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 1897, 2007-04-17. Prohibits firearm regulation within the National Park System. Based on 2006 legislation by Senator George Allen.
        Citizens Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 2424, 2007-05-22. Repeals the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 as amended.
        See also the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2007.

        [edit] Habeas corpus

        See American Freedom Agenda Act.

        [edit] Limited government

        Term limits, 1970s: Paul was the first member of Congress to propose term limits legislation in the House,[54] one of several bills considered “ahead of their time” by Texas Monthly magazine.[2]
        Market Process Restoration Act of 1999. H.R. 1789, 1999-05-13. Repeals United States antitrust law (which limits cartels and monopolies), with intent to restore market economy benefits.
        To repeal the Military Selective Service Act. H.R. 424, 2007-01-11, originally H.R. 1597, 2001-04-26, cosponsored since H.R. 2421, 1997-09-05. Abolishes the Selective Service System, prohibits reestablishment of the draft, and forbids denial of rights due to failure to register.
        Eminent domain: Prevented the Department of Housing and Urban Development from seizing a church in New York through eminent domain.[2]
        International Criminal Court (ICC): Barred ICC jurisdiction over the U.S. military (2002 amendment).[55]
        Global tax: Barred American participation in any U.N. “global tax” (2005 amendment).[55]
        Surveillance: Barred surveillance on peaceful First Amendment activities by citizens (2006 amendment).[55] Individual privacy may be an area of Paul’s greatest influence, and he has long worked tirelessly against forms of what he considers to be federal snooping.[2]
        Sunlight Rule. H.Res. 216, 2009-03-05, originally H.Res. 709, 2006-03-02. Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon. Prohibits votes on legislation from occurring until ten days after its introduction, with the intent of giving lawmakers enough time to read bills before voting on them; allots 72 hours for House members and staff to examine the contents of amendments. Paul charged his fellow legislators with voting for the Patriot Act in 2001 without reading it first; more than 300 pages long, it was enacted into law less than 24 hours after being introduced.[56]
        Congressional Responsibility and Accountability Act. H.R. 3302, 2007-08-01. Prohibits federal rules and regulations not enacted into law by Congress, if they result in job loss or exceed specified costs to individuals, corporations, or all persons in aggregate.
        American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007. H.R. 3835, 2007-10-15. To restore the Constitution’s checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers. Proposes to “bar the use of evidence obtained through torture; require that federal intelligence gathering is conducted in accordance with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA); create a mechanism for challenging presidential signing statements; repeal the Military Commissions Act, which, among other things, denies habeas corpus to certain detainees; prohibit kidnapping, detentions, and torture abroad; protect journalists who publish information received from the executive branch; and ensure that secret evidence is not used to designate individuals or organizations with a presence in the U.S. as foreign terrorists.”[57]
        See also the limited government and income tax abolition amendment.

        [edit] States’ rights
        [edit] We the People Act

        We the People Act. H.R. 539, 2009-01-14, originally H.R. 3893, 2004-03-04. Forbids all federal courts from hearing cases on abortion, same-sex unions, sexual practices, and establishment of religion, unless such a case were a challenge to the Constitutionality of federal law. Makes federal court decisions on those subjects nonbinding as precedent in state courts,[58] and forbids federal courts from spending money to enforce their judgments.

        Because it forbids federal courts from adjudicating “any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion”, secularists have criticized the bill as removing federal remedy for allegations of state violation of religious freedom.[59] As an example of potential for violation,[citation needed] Article 1 of the Texas Constitution provides the (currently unenforced) requirement that office-holders “acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being”. The Democratic Underground online community published the holding that the bill would give state sexual-orientation laws special immunity.[60] The bill is comparable to other jurisdiction stripping legislation such as the Constitution Restoration Act.[61]

        Paul told Congress, “The best guarantor of true liberty is decentralized political institutions, while the greatest threat to liberty is concentrated power.”[61] In April 2006 the Traditional Values Coalition encouraged its contacts to lobby their representatives for passage;[62] the bill was also endorsed by columnist Rev. Chuck Baldwin,[61] and cosponsors include Roscoe Bartlett, Tom Tancredo, Sam Johnson, Walter Jones, Jr., John A. Sullivan, John Duncan, Jr., and Ted Poe.
        [edit] Abortion

        Sanctity of Life Act of 2007. H.R. 2597, 2007-06-06, originally H.R. 776, 2005-02-10. For the purposes of statutory construction over the jurisdictional limitation imposed, declares that “human life shall be deemed to exist from conception”. Removes federal court jurisdiction over abortion cases arising from state laws and effectively negates Roe v. Wade as binding legal precedent.[63] Such a law returns to each state the power to decide whether or not abortion should be allowed, banned, or regulated.
        See also Taxpayers’ Freedom of Conscience Act of 2007.

        [edit] Stem-cell research

        Cures Can Be Found Act of 2009. H.R. 1654, 2009-03-19, originally H.R. 3444, 2005-07-26. Provides tax credits for qualified stem-cell research or storage and for donation of umbilical cord blood.

        [edit] Capital punishment

        Opposes federal use of capital punishment.[64][65]

        [edit] Education

        Teacher certification (amendment): Prohibited funding of federal teacher certification.[2]
        Family Education Freedom Act of 2009. H.R. 1951, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 1816, 1997-06-05.[66] Provides tax credits to families towards spending on any type of children’s education–related expenses, public, private, or homeschool.
        Education Improvement Tax Cut Act. H.R. 1952, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 936, 1999-03-02. Applies a $5,000 tax credit per child for donations to any school in support of scholarships or academic or extracurricular programs.[67]
        Teacher Tax Cut Act of 2009. H.R. 1949, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 937, 1999-03-02. Provides all elementary and secondary school teachers with a $1,000 tax cut.
        Hope Plus Scholarship Act of 2009. H.R. 1953, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 2410, 2001-06-28. Includes qualified education expenses within the Hope Scholarship Credit.
        Professional Educators Tax Relief Act of 2009. H.R. 1950, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 2411, 2001-06-28. Gives all K–12 school librarians, counselors, and other personnel the same $1,000 tax credit as the Teacher Tax Cut Act.[68]
        Make College Affordable Act of 2009. H.R. 1954, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 401, 2005-01-26, cosponsored since H.R. 1631, 1999-04-29. Creates full tax deduction for higher education expenses and interest on student loans.
        Education Professional Development Tax Credit Act of 2007. H.R. 4078, 2007-11-05. To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow elementary and secondary school teachers a credit against income tax for professional development and training expenses.

        [edit] Sexual orientation legislation

        Marriage Protection Act of 2007. H.R. 724, 2007-01-30, originally H.R. 3313, 2003-10-16 (cosponsor). To limit Federal court jurisdiction over questions under the Defense of Marriage Act. Explicitly permits states to continue making a public-policy exception when deciding the status of same-sex relationships independently of the decisions of other states, as states have in fact been permitted to do in the case of incestuous marriages.[69]

        [edit] Environment

        A bill to repeal the Soil and Water Conservation Act of 1977. H.R. 7079, 1980-04-16.
        Dredging: H.R. 7245, 1980-05-01. Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to remove federal jurisdiction from dumping in private (non-navigable) waters, and from state dumping permit programs; permits applicants, rather than the Secretary of the Army, to specify disposal sites when requesting permission to discharge dredged or fill material into interstate navigable waters.
        Fisheries: H.R. 3735, 1998-04-28. To disapprove a rule requiring the use of bycatch reduction devices in the shrimp fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. Annuls federal mandates that require private fisheries to reduce catches of non-targeted species at their own cost.
        Environmental Protection Agency: H.J.Res. 104, 2000-07-13. Disapproves an EPA rule published on 2000-07-13, relating to proposed revisions to its pollutant discharge reduction program, federal antidegradation policy, and water quality planning and management regulations.
        Lake Texana dam: Transferred ownership of the Lake Texana dam project from the federal government to Texas.[2]
        San Jacinto disposal area: H.R. 4829, 2007-12-18. To authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey the surface estate of the San Jacinto Disposal Area to the city of Galveston, Texas.
        To provide for the transfer of certain Federal Property to the Galveston Historical Foundation. H.R. 2121, 2009-04-27, originally H.R. 6440, 2008-07-08.
        Energy Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Automobile Tax Credit Act of 2009. H.R. 1768, 2009-03-26, originally H.R. 6441, 2008-07-08.

        [edit] Health
        [edit] Health reform

        Quality Health Care Coalition Act of 2009. H.R. 1493, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1247, 2003-03-12. Exempts health care professionals from antitrust laws in their negotiations with health plans and health insurance issuers.
        Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act of 2009. H.R. 1495, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1287, 2003-03-13. Strengthens health savings accounts and credit for health care costs, carries forward unused health benefits, and repeals threshold on medical expenses deduction.
        Seniors’ Health Care Freedom Act of 2009. H.R. 164, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 580, 2005-02-02, cosponsored since H.R. 2867, 1999-09-14. Facilitates private contracts under Medicare.
        Nursing Home Emergency Assistance Act. H.R. 1494, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4002, 2005-10-06.
        Treat Physicians Fairly Act of 2009. H.R. 1497, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4872, 2006-03-02. Creates tax credit to medical care providers against income tax for uncompensated emergency medical care, and deduction to hospitals for such care.
        Enhanced Options for Rural Health Care Act of 2007. H.R. 1899, 2007-04-17, originally H.R. 6154, 2006-09-21. Gives specific permission for rural health facilities designated as critical access hospitals to offer assisted living services without losing their designation.

        [edit] Tax cuts

        Prescription Drug Affordability Act. H.R. 163, 2009-01-06, originally H.R. 3636, 2000-02-10 (Pharmaceutical Freedom Act). Creates prescription drug tax credit and facilitates import and Internet sale of such drugs.
        Cancer and Terminal Illness Patient Health Care Act. H.R. 4684, 2007-12-13, originally H.R. 4265, 2000-04-13. Assists those suffering from cancer and other life-threatening illnesses by waiving the employee portion of Social Security taxes.
        Child Health Care Affordability Act. H.R. 1496, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 4799, 2000-06-29 (Family Health Tax Cut Act). Creates income tax credit for medical expenses for dependents.
        Freedom From Unnecessary Litigation Act of 2009. H.R. 1498, 2009-03-12, originally H.R. 1249, 2003-03-12. Creates tax credit for the cost of insurance against negative outcomes from surgery, such as against malpractice of a physician.
        Evacuees Tax Relief Act of 2008. H.R. 7055, 2008-09-24, originally H.R. 4066, 2005-10-17.
        Phosphoric acid: H.R. 961, 2009-02-10, originally H.R. 3732, 2007-10-02. To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphoric acid, lanthanum salt, cerium terbium-doped, compounds which have medical uses.

        [edit] Alternative Health

        Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act. H.R. 5842, 2008-04-17, cosponsored since H.R. 2592, 2001-07-23 (States’ Rights to Medical Marijuana Act). Protects authorized medical marijuana patients and protects state-legal farmers against federal raids. Lets states choose their own stances on medical marijuana regulations, and permits further study, regulation, and use by reclassifying the plant medically.
        Parental Consent Act of 2007. H.R. 2387, 2007-05-17, originally H.R. 5236, 2004-10-06 (Let Parents Raise Their Kids Act). To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental health screening program.
        Health Freedom Protection Act. H.R. 2117, 2007-05-02, originally H.R. 4282, 2005-11-09. Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding health claims of foods and dietary supplements. Authorizes specific health claims to be made about saw palmetto, omega-3 fatty acids, glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and calcium. Establishes government burden of proof in false advertising cases.
        Act to Remove Federal Penalties for the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults. H.R. 5843, 2008-04-17 (cosponsor).

        [edit] Agriculture

        Ag and rural legislation: Cofounded Congressional Rural Caucus, a bipartisan group which promotes legislation to help the agriculture industry and rural communities.
        Agriculture Education Freedom Act. H.R. 1955, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 3626, 1998-04-01. Makes nontaxable the sale of animals raised and sold as part of an educational program.
        Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009. H.R. 1866, 2009-04-02, originally H.R. 3037, 2005-06-22. Excludes industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana for Controlled Substances Act purposes, thereby giving the states the power to regulate and permit farming of hemp. The measure would be a first since the national prohibition of industrial hemp farming in the United States. Paul joined prominent liberal Democrats in urging this proposal. He contends that it would help North Dakota and other agriculture states, where farmers have requested the ability to farm hemp for years.[70] The Economist wrote that his support for hemp farming could appeal to farmers in Iowa.[71]
        Seafood: H.Con.Res. 125, 2007-04-23 (cosponsor). Recognizing the health benefits of eating seafood as part of a balanced diet, and supporting the goals and ideals of National Seafood Month.
        Unpasteurized milk: H.R. 778, 2009-01-28, originally H.R. 4077, 2007-11-05. To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and milk products that are packaged for direct human consumption between states permitting its sale.

        [edit] Ballot access

        Voter Freedom Act of 2007. H.R. 3600, 2007-09-19, originally H.R. 2477, 1997-09-16. Establishes the right of ballot access for candidates with timely petitions containing 1,000 signatures.

        [edit] References

        ^ Paul, Ron (September 2007). “Ending the IRS”. Ron Paul 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
        ^ a b c d e f g h i j Gwynne, Sam C. (2001-10-01). “Dr. No”. Texas Monthly. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
        ^ Dougherty, Jon (2001-03-13). “Bill would restore Congress’ war powers”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2007-06-13.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2002-10-03). “Is Congress Relevant with Regards to War?”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on 2007-11-30. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2002-09-10). “Questions That Won’t Be Asked About Iraq”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2007-07-03. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
        ^ Murray, Shailagh (2003-03-10). “A Far-Right Texan Inspires Antiwar Left”. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2007-06-15.
        ^ a b c Smith, G. Vance (2001-10-22). “The Way to Win: G. Vance Smith is chief executive officer of The John Birch Society”. New American. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ Bill Summary & Status Search Results – THOMAS (Library of Congress)
        ^ “Rep. Paul Introduces American Sovereignty Restoration Act” (subscription). US Fed News Service. 1997-03-01. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
        ^ a b Lamb, Henry (2005-05-16). “Showdown at the U.N. corral”. Enter Stage Right. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ Resnik, Judith (May 2006). “Law’s Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism’s Multiple Ports of Entry”. Yale Law Journal 115 (7): 1659. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ a b c Chumley, Cheryl K (2003-04-24). “New push to ‘get U.S. out of U.N.’: Congressmen ask for House floor vote during time of disdain for global body”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2003-04-29). “America National Sovereignty vs. U.N. “International Law”: Time for Congress to Vote”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on March 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ Kopel, Dave (2001-08-09). “U.N. Out of North America: The Small Arms Conference and the Second Amendment”. National Review. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ Williams, Kyle (2003-05-03). “Walking out of U.N.”. Veritas (WorldNetDaily). Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ Titus, Herbert W. (2003). “H.R. 1146 – The American Sovereignty Restoration Act”. Liberty Committee. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
        ^ Editor (2003-06-11). “Rescue U.S. from the U.N.”. Victoria Advocate: p. 1. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
        ^ Powell, Keith J (2003-06-25). “The ongoing battle of the U.S. versus the rest of the world”. BG News. Retrieved 2008-04-10.[dead link]
        ^ Cooper, Andrew F.; Rowlands, Dave (2005). Canada Among Nations: Split Images. Drache, Daniel, contrib.. pp. 117, 131. ISBN 9780773530263. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
        ^ Mbogo, Stephen (2003-07-16). “House Votes to Fund U.N. but Not Population Fund”. Cybercast News Service. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
        ^ Elvin, John (1997-10-06). “Actually, the United Nations Owes Us!”. Insight on the News. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ McManus, John F (2002-08-26). “Texans issue a challenge”. New American (American Opinion Publishing). Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003″. Arizona Legislature. 2004. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2005″. Arizona Legislature. 2006. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ “A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and Any Other Bilateral or Multilateral Activity That Seeks to Create a North American Union”. Arizona Legislature. 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ “Bill Status Overview: SCM1002″. Arizona Legislature. 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
        ^ Behreandt, Dennis (2006-12-11). “Stalking the Beast”. New American. Archived from the original on 2007-10-11. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ McManus, John F (2005-05-30). “U.S. defenders or UN enforcers? The U.S. military is currently being used as the enforcement arm of the United Nations. America’s Armed Forces must be restored to their only proper role: national defense.”. New American. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
        ^ Bowen, Greg (2000-09-08). “Petitioners want U.S. out of U.N.”. Victoria Advocate: p. 1A. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
        ^ “Liberty Committee: Just 15 Minutes to Answer America’s Question About the United Nations” (subscription). U.S. Newswire. 2003-04-24. Retrieved 2008-04-10.[dead link]
        ^ Norris, Floyd (2006-04-22). “A Penny for Your Thoughts, and 1.4 Cents for the Penny”. New York Times. Retrieved 2007-12-17.
        ^ a b c d e Doyle, Al (2007-07-23). “Presidential candidate Paul passionate over hard money: Texas legislator once ran investment coin firm”. Coin World. Archived from the original on 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-02-14.
        ^ “Discontinuance of M3″. Federal Reserve. 2005-11-10. Retrieved 2007-12-13.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2007-12-13). “Statement Introducing the Free Competition in Currency Act”. Congressional Record (U.S. House of Representatives). Archived from the original on 2008-02-02. Retrieved 2008-02-08.
        ^ Lesnick, Gavin (2007-11-15). “Liberty Dollar office raided”. Evansville Courier & Press. Retrieved 2008-02-08.
        ^ a b Kraft, Stephanie (2009-03-26). “Imperium Watch: Banks, Soundproof No More: U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont calls out the Federal Reserve for coddling the country’s biggest lenders”. Valley Advocate. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ Chapman, Bob (2009-04-18). “Gold, Silver, Economy & More”. International Forecaster (GoldSeek). Retrieved 2009-04-19.
        ^ Kolar, Peter (2009-03-24). “Time to check Federal Reserve”. Baraboo News Republic. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ Chaney, Paul (2009-03-21). “Wrong agenda”. Los Angeles Daily News. Retrieved 2009-04-14. Also in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, the San Bernardino County Sun, and the San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
        ^ “Since the Federal Reserve has considerable discretion in carrying out its responsibilities, to whom is it accountable?”. Federal Reserve Board. 2007-03-07. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2009-04-20). “Audit the Federal Reserve for answers”. Politico.com. Retrieved 2009-04-20.
        ^ Ayari, Mehdi (2009-04-16). “More than 200 march on Tax Day”. Indiana Daily Student (Indiana University). Retrieved 2009-04-16.
        ^ “‘Audit the Fed’ petition to Congress”. Campaign for Liberty. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ Sztukowski, Edward (2009-04-07). “Students throw modern day tea party on Tax Day”. The Appalachian (Appalachian State University). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ McDonald, Karen (2009-04-15). “More than 500 protest during tax day ‘tea party’”. Peoria Journal Star. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
        ^ Wagh, Manasee (2009-04-19). “A timeless protest of government”. Doylestown Intelligencer. Retrieved 2009-04-19.
        ^ Messenger, David (2009-03-30). “Ron Paul draws students to Liberty Campaign event”. Student Life (Washington University). Retrieved 2009-04-14.[dead link]
        ^ Beck, Glenn (2009-03-23). “Are You Profiled as a Militia Member?”. Glenn Beck (Fox News). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ “Glenn Beck”. Glenn Beck (Fox News). 2009-04-15. Retrieved 2009-04-16.
        ^ “Support H.R. 1207 to Audit the Federal Reserve”. Motley Fool. 2009-03-10. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2009-02-23). “On Transparency of the Fed”. Texas Straight Talk (111th Congress (2009)). Retrieved 2009-04-14.
        ^ “Congress Assaults the Courts, Again”. New York Times. 2005-06-18. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
        ^ “Judge rules Gibson County can keep Commandments”. Around the State (Indiana Daily Student). 2005-09-09. Retrieved 2008-03-18.
        ^ “The Libertarian Congressman Is Back”. Wall Street Journal: p. A18. 1997-01-13. Retrieved 2007-09-27.
        ^ a b c Bresnahan, John (2007-10-10). “Paul says Americans’ freedoms under siege”. Politico. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2007-09-16). “The Sunlight Rule”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2007-09-27.
        ^ “Tell your U.S. Representative to co-sponsor the American Freedom Agenda Act”. American Freedom Campaign. 2007-10-15. Retrieved 2007-10-15.
        ^ Rhodes, Randi (2007-08-16). “Ron Paul interview battles Air America Randi Rhodes Show”. Air America Radio. Retrieved 2007-09-27.[dead link]
        ^ Ebonmuse (2008-01-06). “Why Atheists Shouldn’t Vote for Ron Paul”. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
        ^ “The We the (Evangelical) People Act”. Democratic Underground. 2007-12-24. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
        ^ a b c Strom, Ron (2006-01-13). “Bill limits federal courts: Would stop judges from ruling on abortion, same-sex marriage cases”. WorldNetDaily. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
        ^ “Action Alert: We, The People Act”. Traditional Values Coalition. 2006-04-06. Retrieved 2008-04-02.
        ^ Paul, Ron (2007). “Life and Liberty”. Ron Paul 2008. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
        ^ Lofton, John (August 2007). “Excerpts From Our Exclusive Ron Paul Interview”. American View. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
        ^ Smiley, Tavis (2007-09-27). “Ron Paul At Tavis Smiley’s All-American Forum On PBS 9-27-07″ (video). Tavis Smiley’s All-American Forum (PBS). Retrieved 2008-02-06.
        ^ “H.R. 368 – Family Education Freedom Act of 2001″. Home School Legal Defense Association. 2002-06-27. Retrieved 2007-09-13. “Parents and individuals who provide for a child’s education should be allowed to keep some of their tax money that would otherwise have been used to fund public education.”
        ^ “Rep. Paul Introduces Education Package”. Education Exchange. Education Policy. 1999-03. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
        ^ “Teacher Tax Cut Act”. Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. 2003-02-11. Archived from the original on 2007-09-03. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
        ^ Grossman, Joanna (2004-07-27). “The Proposed Marriage Protection Act: Why It May Be Unconstitutional”. Writ. FindLaw. Retrieved 2008-02-15.
        ^ “Reefer Madness: ‘Let’s Embarrass Ron Paul’”. Austin Chronicle. 2007-05-25.
        ^ “On a high”. Economist. 2007-06-21.

    • pfbonney

      “At least Ron Paul won’t be bowing down to George Sore-ass.”

      Don’t bet your bottom dollar on that.

      “In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force. The Task Force “consisting of….9 out of 14 members were linked to Soros’s organs. …Ron Paul proposed to put a bunch of Soros funded think tank experts in charge of dismantling the US military. – “Barney Frank defense-cuts ally Ron Paul has a “Soros defense plan”" – Adam Taxin, Philadelphia Jewish Culture Examiner January 3, 2012

    • paulz

      im with you concerned citizen and Willy….Go Ron Paul… our prayers are with you.

  • Rick

    God help us if either is the candidate!

    • Pat

      you are so correct Rick, neither one of them is worth a darn & that is pretty sad but the WA establishment wants Romney & they along with the media seem to get their way at each election. Very sad

      • Southerner

        Amen to both of you Rick and Pat!

        • Konig

          amen and ditto. We need to be very focused to get the right person, perhaps not perfect.

      • minnie

        The news is that mitt romnie’s FATHER and GRANDFATHER were BORN in MEXICO. Mitt romnie is a HYPOCRITE, HE was hiding that from the American people. He has nevr been vetted just like obama. I was never going to vote for that mutt romnie. Voting for NEW GINGRICH. So how is romnie going to deal with the immigration problem? Obama has an aunt here illegally what about romnie?

        • http://googlechrome David

          Romney? Does sound Mexican. Real name is Carlos Pedro Romney.

        • Capt RCG

          You have been smoking the same Jimson Weed that Paul smokes – put the Kool – Aid down – go back to school & finish 3rd grade – come back & vote for any candidate that will beat obama – no matter who gets the nomination

        • usthepeople

          If Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico then Mitt is ineligible to be President of the United States (just like Obama whose father was a Kenyan and a UK subject and regardless of whether Jr. was a citizen born in Hawaii). He must be a “natural born citizen” which has been defined by the US Supreme Court as BOTH parents as well as the child must have been born on US soil to be eligible for the Office Of The President Of The United States Of America. No one exposed Obama for being ineligible; who will expose Mitt? I don’t know if this is true of Mitt. I have to research it further. If true it would be a good point to bring up by the other candidates.

          • MSGT JOHN CORREA

            Simply have Mitt Romney produce his original birth certificate. I sent a courtesy copy of mine to the four leading Supreme Court Justices to prove a point that birth certificates does not fall under the “Privacy Act” since birth certificates are on demand as proof of who you are and where you were born.

            I had hoped that the Justices of the United States Supreme Court would order the foreign-born agent Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II to show his original birth certificate, and then, have him arrested for deception and fraud.

            MSGT JOHN CORREA
            USAF (RET)

        • usthepeople

          Natural Born Citizen for Dummies – YouTube
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGJdN2KPf0g
          Research it. Copy and paste in your browser.

        • usthepeople

          Incidentally, the following CNN report mentions that George Romney ran for president in 1968. If he was not born in the U.S., how was he able to run for President?

          Well, Wikipedia writes that “questions were occasionally asked about Romney’s eligibility to run for President due to his birth in Mexico, given the ambiguity in the United States Constitution over the phrase “natural-born citizen.”

          However George Romney’s grandparents never gave up their U.S. citizenship when they moved to Mexico, so his parents were citizens, and so was he. The Constitution states:

          The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens of the United States.

          So there you have it. I researched it and found Mitt is indeed eligible. However, Obama is not. BOTH parents must be citizens; Obama’s father was not. Disqualify him or impeach along with his baggage of vice president and all the czars.

      • Patricia Martin

        We each have freedom of choice. We do not have to vote the way they lead us to. Vote the way you are inclined to. Do not let the media tell
        you how to vote. Decide for yourself after you do your research and the media be damned!

    • Charles

      You are so right !!!

    • Ron

      Rick, I agree “God help us”, but who do think should be our Moses that will save us?

      • Dolores Tamoria

        Oh Ye of little faith! The chips are not down yet and already you are moaning and groaning. Moses lead God’s people to the promised land but he himself could not enter. Have faith in God’s Plans. Faith can move mountains.

        • Pepper

          The children of Israel wandered in the desert for 40 years before entering the Promised Land.

          Somebody remind me again. How many years has Ron Paul been telling us we’re going in the wrong direction?

          • Jonathan Gartner

            He has been ranting and raving for at least 30 that I know of

      • Kenai

        We have to get Sarah Palin and-or Allen West in the race. They would be our saviors!

        • csh

          It;s not just the person…. it’s what they syand on and are willing to fight for.

          I like Sarah, but she has ties to that RINO McCain, and I don’t know if she can really get free from that.

          Ron Paul has already proven himself a constitutionalist, already has the momentum, the experience, the support, the stamina, the ability to draw voters from all parties.

          I’m going with Ron Paul.

      • USAMYCOUNTRY

        RON…….or who should be our MOSES”’ES????? I AM STILL WAITING FOR SARAH PALIN TO COME OUT OF THE SHADOWS… SHE IS THE REAL CONSERVATIVES THAT DOES NOT TWIST HER WORDS AND SAYS IT AS IT IS…….

    • Insurgent

      You want the Kenyan chigger for four more??????

      • wireline

        No I would like to see limited government and a return to a Constitutional Republic as promised by the founders. How about a return to liberty and freedom, get big brother off our backs for a change?

        How about you?

        • James Andrews

          I agree. The feds and many of the state governments need to DOWNSIZED, and be FORCED to balance (and keeop them balanced) their budgets, and do so without any new taxes or tax increases, period. And our Constitution MUST be upheld and abidied by, especially our Bill of Rights. Our gun laws are actually too strict in many parts of the nation for example, and should be eased up on. We all know that the stricter the gun “control”, the more violent those areas are that have it. An armed society is a POLITE society!

        • JC

          Thats not going to happen all by itself. People need to really pay attention and vote the man, not the party. We have got to have someone with a strong moral backbone and a desire to see this country return to its constitutional roots. That means we as a country get back to God too.

        • Bruce

          Ron Paul WILL get the goverment OFF OUR BACKS and out of our lives.

          • RacerJim

            Ron Paul’s record during his 14 years in Congress bespeaks his ability to do much of anything.

          • Millicent

            Ron Paul is a Libertarian and a traitor to this country. I make sure I let everyone know the vile things he has said and done. I let people how evil he is and they despise him as much as I do. He is Obama’s chief weapon against getting a true Conservative. Take Ron Paul and put him in the trash heap of histroy along with Benedict Arnold.

          • Paul

            “Racer Jim” and “Millicent” want their guaranteed FEMA coffins, and I hope they get ‘em…

          • Robert A L

            Millicent is a disinformation artist. Notice she provides no substance just negative labels. She is here solely to muddy the waters of discussion. Go back to your Socialist Blog Millicent . . . Corporate Socialist or Marxist Socialist either way you want to take what people EARN with their Blood sweat and tears to give to someone who doesn’t deserve it!

          • Ron

            Right on, if Ron Paul introduces over 600 bills in congress and gets only ONE passed?? Why would anyone think he could convince congress to go along with anything he proposes, if he were president?? Hello??? Get out from under your rock, and see the real world!!

          • Kenai

            Yea and he’ll also get us all killed!

        • patriotrenegade

          ……and eliminate anyone with membership in any globalist org from ever being in our govt again. That’s the real end result we need.

        • csh

          Me too….. Vote Ron Paul. :)

    • Average Joe

      Ricks a dick with alittle prick

    • The Bob

      Better Paul than Romney.

      • RacerJim

        Better Gingrich than Paul, Romney or Santorum.

        • Millicent

          Absolutely. He is the only true Conservative up there. Ron Paul is scum and I mean real scum. The first time I heard him speak in a debate I just dismissed him as a nutjob. Now I see how vile and disgusting he is and his supporters even go around threatening people. I hope this is brought out in the debates. Ron Paul is trash.

          • Paul

            With such a graphic description that you keep spewing about Ron Paul, you are truly one demented NWO-stooge troll…

          • ANTICRIME

            It is an ignorant person that calls good evil and evil good!
            There is no doubt that you, Millicent, would be among those that would try to crucify Jesus Christ again, during his 2nd coming!

            ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

          • Robert A L

            Ah so now we see Millicent is a Corporate Socialist . . . take from the middle class, destroy their way of life to help yachts, Caribbean islands, and Penthouse for the Elites who bribe the easily bribed politicians like Mitt and Newt!

          • Kenai

            I agree about his loony supporters. They are just as bad as the occupiers. They are filled with hate for Israel.

          • Ann in Nebraska

            Millicent, calm down. You’re going to have a stroke or big heart attack. You are full of hate and other vile, evil things. I worry for you. I’m sorry you’re so unhappy. I will pray for you. Ron Paul 2012!!!

          • Jonathan Gartner

            He has for the last 30 years the example of a Libertarian. He denonuonces both Reagan and Lincoln and does not consider himself either a Republican or a Conservative this comes directly from him not from others. And this makes him a total fruit loop

          • American Patriot

            Milliscent,
            You sound so dumb and retarded it’s doubtful if you could dump the pee out of your shoes if the instructions were on the heels!

          • William

            Alright Millicent, I’ll bite your hook.

            I’m calling you out.

            You keep posting your making every effort to reveal Ron Paul for the vile old goat that he is, here’s your chance to be a star.

            It’s your time to shine darling. Lay it out for us, sock it to us baby!

            It’s your time to shine!

            But if you are unable to post links to substantiated evidence to support your claims, you will have done nothing more than permanently discredit yourself.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Jimmy boy, please stop broadcasting your ignorance.

      • Chief2u

        I am with you all the way “THE BOB”, my classmate and also friend of the person FBI.

    • Willis

      God help us, regardless of anything.

      You’re saying we don’t need God’s help if Newt goes up there?

      Ouch.

      • Millicent

        And you’re saying the man with the best record inCongress is not what we need? You’re an imbecile

        • Paul

          And YOU are an already-senile NWO-stooge troll-hag…

        • Steve

          Here’s a link to an article about Newt that may provide some information that you may not have known or remembered:

          http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/2396-newt-gingrich-the-establishments-conservative?showall=1

          No candidate is perfect, but this man’s history is indicative of a political opportunist who “plays ball” with the folks who are more interested in globalism than in a free, sovereign, solvent United States of America. Feel free to refute any of the points, but please try to do so without resorting to gutter talk or unfounded opinion.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          No they rather have a congressman who has done nothing for 23+ years and has been speaking some real strange policies. No one has to make it up its all there not slander or degrading or lies he has done it all to himself others just do not want to believe it.

    • C.C.

      Rick – Are you a DEM or SOCIALIST?

  • Winghunter

    How Marxists Wrote Ron Paul’s Defense Cuts Plan http://bit.ly/xuJtqh

    The Ron Paul claim of ‘blowback’ completely debunked by actualy history: Terrorism and the New American Republic http://www.dojgov.net/Liberty_Watch.htm

    A Quick History Of Socialist Ron Paul http://bit.ly/uJxlHi

    Paul may be an isolationist, but the Founders weren’t http://bit.ly/tcaRRQ

    What Ron Paul Thinks of America http://on.wsj.com/uRqlYU

    To Get Ron Paul’s Insanity, You Have To Understand Libertarianism
    “Libertarianism is to authentic conservatism what Barack Obama is to 19th century liberalism” http://bit.ly/vBBvkk

    Mischief Voters Push Paul To Front Of GOP Race
    http://bit.ly/soNidH

    Ron Paul in 2009–‘I Wouldn’t Risk American Lives’ to End the Holocaust http://cot.ag/w3P7GX

    Ron Paul-Economic Hypocrite
    $550 million in earmarks in the last two years, but he’ll tell you he’s against them
    http://bit.ly/tAMyPa

    Where Libertarianism & the Left are Joined at the Heart http://bit.ly/vMn8Jv

    Ron Paul & the Neoliberal Re-education Campaign http://bit.ly/pTbm9w

    Ron Paul’s worldview: ‘Sheer stupid, half-witted parochialism’ http://goo.gl/dj5Ce

    Ron Paul calls traitor Manning A ‘Hero’ and ‘Patriot’ http://bit.ly/rurgLM

    Paulbot website whines, “REJECT THE TEA PARTY” http://www.dailypaul.com/178341/reject-the-tea-party

    Ron Paul Hates Republicans & Everything They Stand For http://visiontoamerica.org/6530/ron-paul-hates-republicans-and-everything-they-stand-for/#.TvKWlqDFAnE.twitter

    Ron Paul’s Naive Promises http://bit.ly/vkp03j

    • Willis

      Hey Winghunter thanks for the links,

      Wow, I think I’ll vote for Newt.

      Everybody loses but Paul. Your neocon ideals are dead. We aren’t voting for those ideas.

    • Millicent

      I know all this about him. But don’t call him naive. He is as vile and evil as Obama. His supporters probably come from OWS and the rest of Obama’s armies. Ron Paul is trash.

      • kellys

        OWS, those are Obama people.

      • Robert A L

        Millicent you’ve been brain washed.

        You fighting against you own salvation.

        • Kenai

          Robert, Have you ever seen millions of Lemmings making a mad dash to jump into the sea? Voting for Ron Paul is the same.

          • Willis

            Nope, the great thing about the Liberty Movement is that you are allowed to jump into the sea if you want. But don’t expect us to follow that lead.

            Hence, we don’t support Obama, Romney, Santorum, or Piggy (Newt).

          • Millicent

            I love your analogy. The Pied Piper.

          • csh

            Voting for anyone other than Ron Paul will be as drowning in the sea….. we have “already” been thrown into the sea with all of these backstabbing RINOs. Voting for another RINO again, is like grabbing onto an anchor as its hurled to the deep.

      • Ann in Nebraska

        Millicent, please come up with some different words. Vile, evil and trash are starting to wear on me. Ron Paul 2012!!!!

      • csh

        Millicient, you are probably past the point of being able to discuss anything reasonably, since about the only thing you seem to understand is calling names and throwing slurs. You really deserve the same back, but first I’d still rather you exert a little energy and actually try to read the Constitution and our founding documents. Those are what we as a country are supposed to be living by.
        If that is too hard for you, then you really do deserve for the federal government to become your mamma and change your diapers. You are pretty full of it as it appears.

    • ANTICRIME

      WHAT ELSE but pure BS can be expected from the COMMUNIST LEFT?!!
      It reminds me of the CRAP they piled on WI Senator Joseph McCarthy to discredit him and destroy his credibility back in the early 1950′s; ONLY the gullible swallowed it, to their and our detriment today!

      Bottom Line: Today more people than ever are waking up to the fact that Senator Joseph McCarthy WAS RIGHT…..and best of all that their national media CANNOT BE TRUSTED! ~ In truth, OBAMA is the alarm clock that woke-up America!!!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

      • csh

        AMEN !!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      RON PAUL 2012. Watch as his numbers surge and then choke on it, you ill informed idiot.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Thank you very much for the links. I highly suggest all Paulbots look up the information. You might believe one but the landslide is irrefuteable.

  • Concerned American

    Ron Paul is a wacko and will never win the Presidential election. He is a total fruitcake. I cannot understand why anyone would vote for him. Democrats would love to have Ron Paul as the GOP candidate against Obama but it will never happen. We need someone who can bring in Independents and Reagan Democrats to beat Obama, the most incompetent President the U.S. has ever seen. Ron Paul would be the second most incompetent President if he was elected (which he won’t be). Mitt Romney has the smarts, the experience, the economic know-how, the diplomatic skills, and the personality to steer our country through the the dangerous shoals that Obama and his Socialist, gangster friends created. He will turn this country around. Ron Paul is a total joke!

    • Willy

      That’s what makes America great, You get an opinion , too.

      • Southerner

        Yes Willy…. But “Concerned American” is correct! If you knew anything about Government you would know Ron Paul is just the other polarity extreme as Obama on the same battery. If these two are our only choices then America is up the creek without a paddle and the Waterfall is not far away!

        • wireline

          if he is that opposite then that is where we need to be going, it certainly isn’t the direction the country has been going.

          Try liberty and freedom for a change, limited government, get big brother off our backs.

        • KH

          You’d say the same thing about Thomas Jefferson if he were running today.

        • Neil

          “Just the other polarity extreme as Obama on the same battery”. What are you talking about?! Ever since Both
          Bushes, Obama, and the current platter of Republican candidates (except Ron Paul), we haven’t had any change in
          how they have or would run government. Can you please tell me how any of them would run anything differently? Doing the same thing over time and time again and expecting different results in the end is ridiculous.

          BOTH parties have strayed way off course of what once made this country great. Take notice today…there’s NO accountability for anything. No one gets arrested or charged with anything except whistle blowers and the little guys.

          The root of everything Ron Paul stands for stems from our constitution and the rights granted from that document to
          us. He is not for empowering corporations, wall street, privately owned Federal Reserve, banks, or the multitude of other entities sucking off the American taxpayer citizen.

          He is for you and I which is what made this country in the first place from the beginning.

          • csh

            Neil, You are absolutely right. Good words.

          • Southerner

            Neil …It is nice to dream but one day everybody has to awaken to reality!

        • Millicent

          Shows you just how far down our country has fallen that Obama is in the WH and scum like Ron Paul is a candidate. We are toast.

      • http://www.libertyandhope.com/ xRedfoxx

        That’s why I support Paul so much. He is all for the uninformed having the freedom to express their posititon as well!!

        • bullrider

          I like a lot of what Ron Paul says but I think he will be too easy to paint as so extreme that Americans can be frightened away from voting for him. (While the same could have been said of Obama, the media was in favor of him and so did their best to make him seem mainstream and reasonable, not Marxist. They will not be that kind to Paul.)

          I will support whatever nominee the GOP settles on. While I’d rather not see it be Paul I will fully support him – and if someone else gets the nomination and wins in November, there must be someplace in the new admin where Paul could do a whole bunch of good for this country.

        • Millicent

          Ron Paul as a candidate shows how far down this country has fallen. He is worse than Obama. Take that lowlife pile of offal and flush him into the disgraces of history.

          • Paul

            YOU are one demented NWO-stooge troll-hag…

          • Mundus Vult Decepi

            Flush yourself, pig.

          • Patricia Martin

            Millicent, I have read your many statements of hate toward Ron Paul. Apparently you have been hurt so much that you have forgotten how to be civil. You have as much right as me or anyone else to express an opinion, but let’s keep it civil. I have a question for you. Just what has Ron Paul done to you or yours that you hate him so much. Surely you can give me and others some proof that he is as bad as you say. So, let’s have it!

      • Average Joe

        When Dr. Ron Paul is eleticed please feel free to leave America and STAY GONE.

        • patriotrenegade

          THAT ain’t happenin.

        • csh

          Hahaaa GOOD ONE Average Joe…. I second your comment. :)

    • joe

      THE ONLY JOKE IS YOU!

    • Lou

      You didn’t read the 6 reason why !

    • http://aol peabodykd

      Your the wacko you dirt for brain moron

      • Margo

        “Your”? Your what? You must mean “you’re”…who’s the dirt brain?

        • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

          Go Margo! “Nuff Said”

        • Willis

          Wow, I’ve never used Dirt Brain before.

          “What’s up, Dirt Brain?” WINNING!!

    • Rubin

      NO Concerned American ” You are the Joke” You are the reason that this country sucks” You are a complete idiot” and its idiots like you that have a liberal opinion and have ruined this country! Mitt is a New World Order Liberal pretending to be a phoney Republican, and if thats what you say is smart, once again you are a idiot! So stay away from the voting boths and you and your boy freind go do what you do on voting day….

      • donald

        Gee, Rubin. Do you have any idea what civility means? Your name calling puts you right at the level of the liberal democrats and obama whom we’re trying to replace.

      • Robert A L

        No Concerned is not an idiot. He is a diabolical arsehole spewing disinformationalist crap on to these pages of truth about the most honest man to run for President in over 100 years!

        He should be ashamed but he is to blind and ignorant to understand that . . .

      • csh

        I know…. after awhile, you just get tired of explaining why the constitution is good for people, and supporting the guy who supports the constitution is good for us. You are so right about Mitt though. He pretends to be from the people, but his only business experience was to buy into businesses to shut them down, profiting for himself, while putting real people out of work. check this out….
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLWnB9FGmWE

    • http://NA Don Joyner

      As idiots come and idiots go, those like you to the lowest flow!

    • Freeme

      Concerned American…quit while you still have some semblance of sanity left and RESEARCH instead of listening to MSM ‘social engineering’ you and telling you how to ACT and THINK! Voting for anyone else than RP, will bring this country so fast it will make your head spin…and it should be spinning now with all the empty promises and lies heard over the last 20 years!

      • patriotrenegade

        This page, for the first time is so childish. All I’m seeing here is a bunch of brat college kids screaming and yelling while offering anything resembling anything halfway intelligent. wow. these are what paul has for support? Anyone this crowd likes has to be bad.

        • patriotrenegade

          the wor NOT was left out.

    • http://aol jelloquest

      I have an opinion also. We need Obama, (tied, neck in neck with Carter, for the worst President ever) to GO!!!!!!! Ron Paul can’t get elected.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        And who says Ron Paul can’t get elected? The Oxycontin gobbler, the phone pervert O’Rielly, or the imbecile who tosses the football?

        Well guess what, you ignoramus, Ron Paul’s numbers are consistently high, unlike the up and down flip floppers, who come and go. But, the establishment Nazi propagandists say that Ron Paul “can’t get elected” so I guess he can’t. Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

      • csh

        Right! Voting for Ron Paul is voting for the constitution to be upheld. Voting for anyone else is voting for further blurring the parties into one massive socialistic handover to a tyrannical executive branch.

    • Jet

      Romney is four more years of the same as what we have, he should be running on the demorcratic ticket, anyone who can’t see the similarity is insane, he has flip floped on every major issue , a true politician tell them what they want to hear and get elected and do nothing of what you promised, Ron Paul is the only candidate left that tells it like it is, he is for less government and would balance our budget, Romney is a white obama and thats all he will ever be, listen to ron and only a idiot would disagree with what he says.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      It is very interesting that this blog is now quoting the Huffington Post am I the only one that see’s some real problems with this??? And Paul is a nut case has been for 30 years with his amoral views.

      • Robert A L

        That is the height of spin that is . . . Ron Paul is the only candidate who has a solid moral code that he follows at all times. The others are always willing to negotiate their moral stance.

        • csh

          AMEN !!!

      • Millicent

        Glad there are some sane people here. RP has Obama’s armies and OWS supporting him He is a vile excuse for a human being.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Suck s&%t out of my ass and die, b*&%h

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Ah the violence of the irrational left. No matter I am prepared. My trainers would love to see how many piece I can make out of you. I do not attack but, will always defend and since you and the Paul bots have finally gotten to that point I would have little problem morally or ethically to do so just like the people that just killed that Iranian sciencetist

      • Willis

        Dirt Brain.

    • Joseph Hunt

      More independents voted for Ron Paul in Iowa than all the others combined. He is for the re-establishment of the Constitution. He is NO wack-job, you need to go to his webpage a read what he stands for and quit listening to the Republican establishment elite. Romney will be another McCain. RINO.

      • RacerJim

        More non-residents of Iowa voted for Ron Paul in the Iowa caucuses than all the others combined.

        • Millicent

          And New Hampshire too. The country is nuts.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            No New Hampshire is hardly a reflection of this country. We will find Paul losing steam very soon and his Paul bots self-destructing or getting violent just like the ones above

      • csh

        EXACTLY ! Well said.

    • donald

      Concerned American: One of the more intelligent commentaries!

      • Robert A L

        If you don’t know what you are talking about . . .

        Concerned American crafted his handle to resemble Concerned Citizen to confuse and feed off of CC work then he posted links loaded with disinformation designed to hide/obfuscate the truth about Ron Paul and nature of our country today.

        Purely a disinformationalist play

    • Gary

      When people have no evidence to support their position they resort to name calling and belittling their opponents. That’s exactly what you, the Republican Candidates and the Establishment are trying to do. You will fail? Ron Paul is, by far, the best candidate with real moral and Constitutional values and convictions of every candidate. Mitt Romney is running so close to Obama’s style that Obama would probably beat him and I strongly believe that Obama would wish that Romney, Newt, Perry or Santorum would be the nominee because his chances of re-election would go up dramatically. Romney, Newt and Perry have some serious baggage that should scare every sensible thinking American. Santorum is really another big government guy based on his long term record. Ron Paul is just the opposite of all these guys. Do your homework before you speak!!! Obama really fears Ron Paul because of his Constitutional values which the others don’t have!

      • http://bellsouth chrissygirl

        So glad to read a more intelligent comment!
        Dr.Paul has the very best ideas to heal this country..I will
        support him and if he is nominated vote for him!
        Don’t listen to all of the idiotic Naysayers..
        Chrissy

        • patriotrenegade

          Beck was right when wrote a book about arguing with idiots (or cult members).

          • Willis

            Since when do you, A scientologist, have a say in who is a cult.

            If we are a cult we are the Cult of America, because that is what we are ALL ABOUT.

            The reason we like Ron Paul is because WE TRUST HIM.

            The only idea that I will die for is that Jesus Christ is Lord. American liberty is the only governmental ideal that promotes the freedom to follow Christ unhampered.

            That is WHY WE FIGHT!!!!

        • csh

          Good goin’ Chrissy! Glad to see some real thinkers on here.

      • RacerJim

        If Ron Paul truely has Constitutional values which the others don’t have then why has he said that the issue of Obama’s eligibility doesn’t matter just like the others?

      • Charlotte Juett

        Gary,
        You are so right! Obama really only fears Ron Paul because once the truth is brought to light and listened to by the people, lies don’t have a chance. The rest of the pack want only to increase their own power and glory, Ron Paul cares for the whole country and an individuals freedom.
        I, personally, want a president that supports the Constitution and principles that the United States was founded upon and not one that will trample on the Constitution.

        • csh

          I second that, Charlotte!

    • Doug

      Concerned American, You are right. Paul’s foreign policy, blind eye to Iran, and libertarian views would further weaken America. His age is also a problem. That being said, I would vote for Dr. Paul over tribesman obama any day.

      • Average Joe

        Ron Pauls forein pollicy is not nieve His pollicy will be deplomacy you know talking to other countrys. Everybody thats talking abought bombing and nuking Iran is saying play ball with me or I’ll shove the bat up you ass. Are you people so dumb as to not figgure thats how we got into the wars that we’ve been in for ten years started. Talk abought fools and morons you people take the cake and don’t even know what to do with it.

        • Robert A L

          You make a great deal of sense for a guy who can’t spell. Just goes to show you wisdom is found everywhere just as incompetence is found everywhere . . .

          Don’t judge a book by it’s cover or by the slander of those who stand to profit by your ignorance of said book.

        • csh

          Average Joe, they can’t really debate what’s constitutional if they haven’t even read it. It’s much easier to just believe all the RINO propaganda and drink their Kool-Aid,

      • RacerJim

        The fact that Ron Paul has said he wouldn’t support any other GOP nominee is reason enough to not vote for him, and the fact that many/most Ron Paul supporters have said the same thing is reason enough to not listen to them.

        • Paul

          RP says that because he KNOWS that all the others are NWO-stooges…

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Good Jimmy, then don’t listen to us and shut your mouth.

        • Willis

          As a result of your logic, you lose.

          Paul or Obama; reality is tough for some.

          • Millicent

            Yes it amounts to which vial of poison do you want to drink

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Not only that but, the Paulbots are in denial they refuse over and over again to deal with the reality of this wing nut the evidence is provided out of his own mouth and over 30 years. If you want consistency you have it with Paul constant insanity

    • donald

      Absolutely!

    • Oregon Bill

      How spot on you are, Ron Paul has absolutely no chance to win the general election, I’m definitely a Conservative, and I see Romney as the only one that can actually win, we need Obama out, period and God help us get the Senate back, then America has a chance to be great once again, it’s the most important since 1980.

      • csh

        Ron Paul is the ONLY one who has a chance at beating Obama because he is the ONLY one who actually offers a choice. The others are all rubberstmped RINOs that are following the same BIG government plan.
        He actually has the best chance to win, because he is capable, and is already showing it, that he can pull votes from all parties and all ages, because he stands on the thing that we can all unite with….. the CONSTITUTION. If the GOP would ever get smart enough to support him instead of fight him, they would win in a landslide. However fighting him only shows that having the republican seat is not as important to them as being able to promote their RINO socialist agenda.

    • Art Chandler

      Concerned American is right. Paul is an eccentric and a rude man, at best. There was a letter to the National Review a couple of months ago from a man who approached him with a reasonable question. He was rebuffed with more than just rudeness, embarrrassing some of Paul’s Republican associates sitting nearby.
      He is not a suitable candidate.

      • Robert A L

        BS propaganda

        I have met and spoken with Ron Paul he is a Kind and Gentle Man, a Baby Dr. who seeks to restore our country to it’s intended greatness in spite of all the profit seekers who want to carve her up for their personal benefit while taking her to her lowest point ever.

      • Willis

        This is such a dirt brainish comment.

      • Paul

        (F)Art (c)Handler is one of the naive, gullible, ignorant, and stupid sheeple, OR he is a NWO-stooge hired-plant troll – and in either/any case can be ignored, as he is (this comment notwithstanding)…

        • Willis

          Paul, that doesn’t help.

        • csh

          Yeah Paul …. I was thinking about that as well…… I have had the opportunity to meet with Ron Paul personally, and he is a very gentle character. Watching the way these radical attack dogs treat him, I am genuinely impressed with how he can keep his composure and still remain civil to them. That only shows me how he can stay on focus and not get steered off on some rabbit trail from the left…. or stoop to their level. He is Constitutionally sound, of great character, and is consistent. No flip flopping around like these other candidates. That is also why he will make a great leader and president.
          Ron Paul for 2012!

    • rob

      lets see if I understand you. giving CONSTITUTIONAL answers to questions is WACKO!! let me take a WACK at being presumptutious you are an decendent of ELLIS ISLAND HUNS and or PEASANTS!

    • Roy

      So since when have you been a shrink? you sounf more like a nut cas tban Ron paul.you don’t sound like an americanWould you rathere be a global slave under Obummer or mitt Rominey or at worst Newt Ginritch? get a life man

    • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason

      Ron Paul is the only one with a sane foreign policy. You can’t go around the world picking fights with countries that didn’t attack us… That is very stupid and dangerous. If we need a war, we declare it, go in, win it, come home. You don’t bankrupt the country with undeclared, endless, unwinnable wars, policing the world, and nation building.

      Common sense people!

      Ron Paul 2012!

      • patriotrenegade

        I thought the four globalist horsemen for bama in the repub race were bad, now I believe paul is another shill for the bama machine.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          You just let the cat out of the bag — you’re a damn fool.

      • RacerJim

        Ron Paul is the only one with a moronic foreign policy. You can’t not pick a fight with countries who repeatedly threaten to attack us…especially countries soon to have nuclear warheads and rockets/missiles to deliver them…that is very idiotic and suicidel. We have never bankrupted the country with undeclared, endless, unwinnable wars but, rather, with unConstitutional, limitless, unproductive socialism.

        • csh

          Jim, do you not realize that our entangling ourselves with other countries as an offensive measure, instead of preserving our resources, to have the strength when needed, to act as a “DEFENCE”, (which is what our military was constitutionally designed to do) has worked against us instead of for us???? We have used our money, strength, intellect, and resources to build up and train other countries militarily, HELPING them with strategy, so that they later turn around and use it against us???? We build up one leader to go against another….. and then they both end up coming against us. We spend money in destroying other countries and then further pour our finances into building them back up again. We have made ourselves BROKE. Do you understand the word BROKE????? WE are even PAST broke…. We are so far into debt, that there is only ONE chance to possibly getting us back on our feet again… and that is to follow the CONSTUTION, and abide by it.
          *Quit acting as World bullies and instigating wars, pitting one country against the other.
          *Bring our troops back home from over 130 countries, saving BILLIONS of dollars.
          *Refocus, by building our own country back up instead of depleting it.
          *Act as an ally instead of a nanny. Israel has already supported Ron Paul’s position of allowing them to defend themselves. They would rather NOT have our money and our intervention, so as to remain independent, and the Prime minister has said so.

          There is a reason Ron Paul gets more support from the military than all of the other candidates put together… they understand that we are stretched too thin, they know that they are being steered into playing the role of world police for the U.N. more than a national defense for ourselves. We are drained both physically, and emotionally. We need to make our money work for us here, make use of our own resources, instead of paying excessive amounts of money to import natural resources that we already have. we need to become more independent, and protect our borders as constitutionally instructed…. yet remain allies with other countries. We can still barter and trade, but with respect to other countries as being their own country, and not acting either as a nanny or a bully.

          Ron Paul is the ONLY one who “gets it” and that’s why he gets the most support from the veterans, and why his support is constantly growing from all parties.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Nice try. The military supports many people including unfortunately Obama. There is no majority for Paul so sorry. Now how do I know?? I have trained many officers in my career they stretch from here to Germany to Afghanistan to Japan and they know what is going on and they have said as much. That people have claimed to be military when contributing to Paul don’t make it so.

      • csh

        Yes!!! We have some sanity and common sense people on here! :)
        Thank you Jason!

    • Dan

      I almost didn’t add my opinion here. All of you people who are against Ron Paul are so
      deceived. If all of you lived in the times of the Revolutionary War, you would be opposed to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and others like them. They called them TORIES then. They wanted to continue to be ruled by King George and pay those high taxes. They called George Washington a nut case, unable able to win, etc.

      Go ahead and elect Romey. You will be everlastingly sorry. I PROMISE YOU !

      We know what to expect from Obama. You will expect something different from Romney, but guess what?

      YOU’RE GOING TO GET THE SAME…THE SAME…THE SAME…MARK MY WORD!

      • RacerJim

        Go ahead and nominate Ron Paul. You will guarantee the demise of the United States of America.

        • csh

          NOT voting for him will be our demise.

    • ANTICRIME

      CA, THE REASON we have an INCOMPETENT POTUS is simply because we have a majority of INCOMPETENT VOTERS, my friend!
      IF we do not make them a minority through proper education then we will CONTINUE to have incompetency and evil intent leading our country to ruination!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • ANTICRIME

      CA, Have some more Kool-Aid with your “fruitcake”, my friend!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

      • RacerJim

        ANTICRIME, that you believe we have an incompetent POTUS bespeaks your intelligence and/or judgement. Have some more Paul-Aid with your “nutcake”.

        • ANTICRIME

          @RJ, And for you not being able to realize his incompetence only shows that you drink from the same bottle he does, my friend!

  • Straight Shooter

    Great article! The deliberate deception of the media is amazing! I am so disappointed in FOX news. However, they seem to be doing better. Ron Paul, when asked on FOX news what he would do if complications arise in the Straits of Hormuz, said, “I would study whether the problems threaten the US, if they do, I would get a declaration of war from congress, then I would go in, get it down and get out.” What part of this constitutional approach is dangerous to America? Ask the press I’m sure they’ll figure out another good lie!

    • RacerJim

      That Ron Paul said he’d have to study whether an Iranian blockade of the Straits of Hormuz would threaten the U.S. is proof positive his foreign policy is moronic.

      • csh

        Anyone who would just “REACT” instead of studying something is the one who is acting moronic.

        Ron Paul is calm, collected, reasonable, and constitutional. “IF”, after checking the situation out himself, and after CONGRESS decides to declare war, THEN he would go in to win it….. not just fly off the handle subjecting us all to indefinite warfare with no real strategy or goal.

        That is being rational. That is following the constitutional process.

        Ron Paul is the one of reason. He is a true leader.

        That is why we need him as president.

  • NoBama

    Ron Paul is the only Republican worthy of my vote and that I can actually be excited about voting for. No more “holding my nose and voting for a lesser evil”.
    Thank God for Ron Paul.

    • Winghunter

      To Get Ron Paul’s Insanity, You Have To Understand Libertarianism
      “Libertarianism is to authentic conservatism what Barack Obama is to 19th century liberalism” http://bit.ly/vBBvkk

      • Straight Shooter

        The constitution should not be radical to Americans. It is what this country fought for– Freedom from taxes! Freedom from government intrusion! Freedom from Government abuses and Searches without warrants! Freedom to defend ourselves! Freedom to speak ones view point! Freedom to choose our own officials! What has happened to America?????

        • Winghunter

          Ron Paul’s Naive Promises http://bit.ly/vkp03j

          • Average Joe

            Ya maybe he cant cut A trillion dollors in the first year But I’d bet he could cut 750 billion and no other campainer is even saying theyed try that

        • wireline

          yes it shouldn’t be radical but it is, but it was radical in Jefferson’s time also, the very idea of overthrowing their king was radical.

          very radical, the kind we need again

          the kind that will throw the yoke of big brother off our backs and a return to a government of the people, not the ruling class oligarchy

          we have much the same as a king it is just the form of it is a little different. At least we aren’t getting our heads chopped off yet for our opinion, not yet anyway

      • Jonathan Gartner

        I totally agree however when some one waves the Constitution around and it has been ignored attention automatically goes to them. Morals and ethics are missing in the Libertarian approach you get so much freedom that chaos ensues any one studying Libertarian’s realize this very quickly

        • wireline

          ummm, I wouldn’t get to comparing Ron Paul’s moral and ethics against the likes of the newt or the mitt or even Santorum too much if I were you.

          then we get into this thing my guy is more Christian than your guy and up next to Ron Paul I think they are all loozers, but then you have to really understand the subject well, as you seem to be trying to attest to

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Logic gives it to us in that Paul has said that he is neither a Conservative or Republican. His policies in that he has not passed anything in 23+ years in congress atests that he would get nothing done. He has also denonouced both Lincoln and Reagan this person is not what he seems look up the evidence for yourself and what he has said over 30 years.

      • http://NA Don Joyner

        Libertarianism WAS our oringinal form of governing before the GREED oF BANKSTERIZM destroyed it. The constitution states emphatically that no barristers or BAR assoiciation members shall hold a position in congress and that is about all we have in there except for Ron Paul and a few others. The silent majority shall rule this time once and for all.

        • wireline

          AWESOME!!! How few really know that

          They certainly don’t want to teach that in the public skool (fool) system anymore. Can’t have to many educated folks running around that really understand what happened when the founders decided to throw off the yoke of the monarchy. It has now been subsubstituted by an oligarchy. Not quite as bad, but almost and getting worse as time goes on. Ever notice all the perks and priviledge congressional members receive? most think it is theirs for lifetime too, kind of like the lords and ladies of old ruling over their serfs.

        • Ann in Nebraska

          Don, I’d wager that 99.9% of the Ron Paul haters on here do not know that he has opted OUT of the pension plan for Congress. When he retires from Congress, he will collect NO federal pension. I’d be surprised if even one-tenth of them have ever listened to him speak or visited his web site. Most of these people have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about. Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!

          • Millicent

            Who cares about that. He is a vile lowlife against America. He sure is good at bringing home the pork though. That is the only reason this evil racist antisemitic old goat keeps his seat.

      • ANTICRIME

        BIG DEAL…Jonah Goldberg’s conclusions and opinions! ~ Bring it on!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • RacerJim

      So, if Ron Paul isn’t the Republican nominee you’re not going to vote for whomever is?

  • Uncle Pat

    I like Ron Paul and if he is the nominee I will vote for him. But, I like Newt much better. He has the experience to” hit the ground running” and has most of the solutions necessary to correct the majority of our problems. Plus, Newt would destroy Obummer in a debate. I can not picture Dr. Paul beating Obummer in a head to head debate.He rarely is able to shine above the republicans during most of the debates.

    • richardwilson

      i agree with newt being the candidate that can replace obama,he has the nohow to defeat the socialist in congress and the obamas.

      newt is the only candidate that has the nohow to beat obama,he has ben there done that before.

      • BigJohn

        Try “spell check” until you learn the English language.

        • spike

          Big John, I think it is the content of what a person writes not the way in which it is written. You can probably find a gramatical forum on the internet where you can point out spelling errors etc.
          This forum is political in nature and encourages discussion of ideas regardless of spelling.

          • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

            Well said Spike! At least this person in question has as much right to express an opinion as anyone else. I’m Sick and Tired of these so called Politically correct people who criticize others who might slip in their brain signals to the fingers. They still make a point! ‘Nuff Said!

      • Joseph Hunt

        RINO

      • KH

        Newt is a socialist. Don’t you people study voting histories?

        • wireline

          no they listen to MSM and their lies about Paul being to the left of Obama, LMAO, can you imagine a bigger lie

          the day Obama comes out for a limited government…won’t happen never mind

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Ah yes he is. Many of his polices are way left of Obama who hates the military and what we can do Paul would do much the same leaving us naked in the rather nasty world

        • RacerJim

          Ron Paul is an isolationist and gay-rights proponent. Don’t you people study voting histories?

        • Millicent

          Yes and he has the most Conservative. He is rated at 61% by the trackers of this. The average is 56%. Get a life you idiot you wouldn’t know a Conservative if you fell over one.

    • Stan

      Don’t deceive yourself Pat,Ron Paul’s knowledge will have no problem beating mr.teleprompter.I prefer Mr. Clean AKA Ron Paul to Snidely Whiplash AKA Newt Gingrich any day,honesty and truth over lies and deception.Haven’t we had enough of the deception and lies?It’s time to put true values and principles, and the constitution back to work to make this country great again!

      • wireline

        it was funny to watch Obama trying to argue with a plumber on the street playing pitch and catch with his kid during the last campaign,

        he struggled with that one for sure

        • RacerJim

          But that didn’t prevent him from being elected, did it?

    • Rubin

      Come on Uncle Pat, Wake up, If the truth stands tall then the truth will over come the devil! Just common sense the American public wont trust this idiot Obama. The rich are getting richer and donating millions while most have seen how they have be played. I think Ron Paul is the only one who can beat barry and the polls show that also…. INFOWARS.COM

      • Patricia Gault

        Rubin,
        Here are just a few videos that will set your hair on fire:
        Loose Change #2
        End Games
        Infowars
        ae911truth.org
        Wake up people, the wolves have been at our doors for years, and if we don’t stand up and stop them, we will be devoured. And that’s not just babble. Check it out……… What do you have to loose??????

    • gml

      Newt is also the most intellegent. I personally love Rick Perry but he is just too mild mannered to do the job. Obama is a dirty politician and we can expect the dirtiest run in history!! Perry really hates Obama. And contrary to poular belief and the liberal media he is not a Bilderberger!!!! and is not in bed with the Bush family. They backed Huntsman! We have serious problems with the Mexicans in Texas, also the wildfire issue. Obama grounded all the government planes in a labor dispute and left Texas to it’s own devices. Other states chipped in but not the government. Rick Perry is unliked because of the Gardesil issue and also NAFTA. Neither of which we did here. He listens to the people of Texas.
      FYI…. Ron Paul has been a Texas Congressman for 23 years. In that time he has introduced 620 pieces of legislation. One (that’s 1) has passed & become law. It was a bill that asked the Federal Government sell the Old U.S. Customs house in Galveston, Texas to the Galveston Historical Society for fair market price. It passed unanimously. He’s a real shaker & a mover alright. He campaigns that he “is not responsible for a single piece of pork barrel legislation”. Duh.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Give the man a prize unfortunately watch out for the irrational rants and raves of the Paul bots they do not understand his social progressive stance and his interptation of the Constitution are not what the founding fathers had in mind.

      • Brady

        I hate to disillusion you GML,but Perry was invited to the Bilderberger meetings. So,with that being said,he is backed by them and would not trust him one iota.

      • Kelly O’Flynn

        Newt is the MOST intelligent and logical choices of all our GOP candidates. He’s the only one of them I feel a sense of security with.

      • wireline

        “FYI…. Ron Paul has been a Texas Congressman for 23 years. In that time he has introduced 620 pieces of legislation. One (that’s 1) has passed & become law”

        Guess that tells you where the rest of the Congress is when it comes to following the Constitution or at least giving it more than just lip service, huh. I find it rather appalling to say the least.

        • RacerJim

          What that tells me is that Ron Paul wasn’t able to convince enough members of Congress to vote for any of the other 619 pieces of legislation he introduced.

          Not exactly what I’d consider proof of his leadership ability.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          I dont know he is hated by every body in congress as a rather nasty old man. And how do you know that some bills were perfectly good??? I know he voted for more pork and his stance on immigration is the worse of all canidates including Perry

      • ANTICRIME

        gml, Oh but you missed the grand blooper of Perry’s career in his approving the building of the Globalists “Trans-Texas Corridor” which is to link Mexico & Canada together with the USA in their planned creation of a “North American Union”! ~ The proverbial “cat” is out of the bag concerning Rick Perry’s allegience!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • Freeme

      but PAT….look how the ‘debates’ thus far have been orchestrated and manipulated by the moderators! Even LEFT LOONS like MAHR and JOHN can SEE the MSM working hard to destroy PAUL.

    • Kevin

      He rarely is able to shine above the republicans during the debates is because he barely ever gets any time to speak. Ron Paul is left out of 90% of the the news stories regarding the primaries, even the charts leave him out. How can the guy in the #2 spot not even be mentioned?

      Its clear that the establishment will do anything to keep Ron Paul from winning, that alone is reason enough to vote for him. If there is that much pressure to hold him down, I ask why, he must be willing to change the status quo gravy train of the same.

      There is zero difference between the Republicans and Democrats, just different means to the same end. Ron Paul is the only choice to save the country. We are 15 trillion dollars in debt, I don’t see anyone doing anything to help. Ron Paul wants to get the government out of your life as much as possible, that’s a good thing.

      Newt is a smart guy but he’s the same thing AGAIN! Santorum is a nut job, more war for everyone and I’m from PA, I know all about Santorum. He pro gun which is great but so is Ron Paul. Romney looks like a President but he’s a democrat in reality. More government from him.

      Anyone who is for gun control against it’s law abiding citizens has an alterior motive. Why disarm the people unless you want to control them, now or in the future?

      I suggest reading the Constitution and lets pare down the government back to whats its meant to do, protect us from foreign threats, that’s it. The states do everything else for themselves.

    • Average Joe

      Everybody knows Obama will lose every debate because there will not be any telaprompters in front of him to give him the anssers. When he is challanged he will stall try to change the direction of the question and just look stupid. He got elected because of his speach wrighters since hes been in office hes used tellaprompters to speek even to 3rd graders. Hes never had A clue and now he dosent have A hope

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      “He rarely is able to shine above the republicans during most of the debates”?

      You’re not listening, boy.

    • ANTICRIME

      UP, “Hit the ground running”….in WHICH DIRECTION?! ~ TOWARD GLOBALISM; go study! (Hosea 4:6 “My people perish for their lack of knowledge”!)

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • Paul Garrison

    ONE reason he will never get my vote, his stance on Israel. You can cut all foreign aid except Israel. You can give them money without telling them what to do.

    • Joseph Hunt

      You have not read his stance on Israel. We give more “aid” to Israel’s ememy’s than we give to Israel and he says that needs to STOP.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        And he also has stated that he killing of a person perfecting atomic weapons that the state of Iran will use against both Israel and US to mention only two is terrorism. Terrorism is attacking civilian targets that have no military value to promote fear. Killing this person was deliberate no one else was hurt and the scientist was perfecting weapons to be used against us

        • Willis

          So planting a car bomb is not terrorism?

          So, now, car bombs aren’t terrorism.

          Wow. Ouch.

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Obviously you do not read real well it killed only the sciencetist typical Paul bot

      • wireline

        yep

    • KH

      Israel has 300 nukes. How many more do they need to blow up the Middle East?

      • Jonathan Gartner

        And yet have never used any. Iran would not have that problem

    • Chad

      How much money do we have to give right now?! We are bankrupt as a Nation!!!! How many times have you been to Isreal to visit family??

    • Brady

      Why can’t we cut aid to Israel ?? That has to be the dumbest statement I have ever heard. Hey pal,our country is broke,what part of broke don’t you understand ???? I’ll tell you what,why don’t you give all your hard earned money and send it to Israel. What is so sacred about Israel ?? You have to start reasoning with yourself,who do you support,the U.S. or Israel ? People like you are responsible for the way our country is screwed up.

      Where does it say in our Constitution,that we are to support other nations ? Further,we are not to have favored nations,which both Washington and Jefferson stated.

      • ANTICRIME

        THE TRUTH of the matter is that Ron Paul is adhering to the WARNING that George Washington gave to the American people during his farewell speech upon leaving office; basically he said TO NOT GET INVOLVED IN OTHER NATIONS FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR TO EXPRESS FAVORITISM TOWARD ANY OF THEM! (Google: George Washinton’s Farewell Address)

        SINCE we did not listen to our first POTUS, we have have entangled ourselves with Israel along with all her problems and enemies!

        America was meant to be for AMERICANS whose only interests in foreign nations were for TRADE purposes! ~ And YES Americans would help by providing aid IN DISASTERS…..not in “nation building”!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Actually if you read history muslims do not need a reason except you do not believe in their insanity

      • Southerner

        Brady…..It is idiots like you who do not know that Israel buys more than 85% of the aid they receive in American made products (which improves our economy), and they are the single largest contributors to many of the weapons that guard our troops in the field! …And in accordance with you last remark explain Tripoli which is an important part of the national defense of this nation and even part of the Marine Corps anthem…… Explain that Smart A-s!

    • Roy

      Why do we haveto give any forgien country money?

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      U.S.S. Liberty.

      • Southerner

        Yes lets talk about the USS Liberty!

        This will just show how off the tract of reality you Ron Paul supporters are!

        It is painful to say but so many of use never understand the difference between the factor of what is intelligence and what is mis-information. My purpose in this commentary is to bring to light many things that escape our methodology of thought because most all of us are the victims of mis-information. I in my life served in counterterrorism and counterintelligence for 27 years. Most people think because they have served in the military or in the government they actually have a true grasp on what is really happening. Nothing could be further from the truth!

        Those who do know what truth is really available will most likely die and go to the grave with that knowledge. Every government of the world is involved in the intelligence and mis-information plot. Let me make a break down of who works for who:

        Intelligence Mis-Information

        1. Private Contractors 1. Mis-informed Politicians
        2. Intelligence agencies 2. News Media
        3. Military personnel 3. Military personnel
        4. Private Individuals 4. Foreign Governments and Diplomats
        5. General public
        6. Religious Institutions
        7. Terrorist groups
        8. Law enforcement agencies
        9. Government Agencies
        10. International Agencies (United Nations, CIA, ect.)

        Even from within the United States Government the majority of people who actually have an idea of what and why things are actually happening are appointed, contracted, and or government employees. Not elected officials! If you think because your Senator says something or your Commanding Officer says something was like this or like that, and that is the reality….well you are sadly mistaking!
        I want to touch on a subject that seems to be pulling attention due to the position of the United States Government concerning Israel. I will state what I know as a person who has both worked in Intelligence and counter Intelligence. I will make no apologies, but I will challenge you to step back from what you think you know to get a glimpse of what is really happening or has happened.

        Let’s begin this Journey from 1947-8 the time of the beginning of the State of Israel. I will ask questions and make commentary and you decide for yourself.

        1. Both Britain and the United States were seeking very earnestly how to maintain an base of operations both naval, air, and ground in the Middle East for both Strategic and economical concessions. The United States State Department even was a size able component in propelling the movement for the proposed Jewish State of Israel before the newly established United Nations.
        2. However they both had much larger interest in mind! Both the United States and Britain supplied weapons and supplies to the Arab States, and Britain even worked vigorously to prevent the importation of arms to the Jewish settlement.
        3. Britain and the United States even struck an agreement to help the new Jewish State to be established while as well having an agreement to divide it when it failed to defend itself against the overwhelming odds of the Arab militias. The United States was to get the Northern section and Britain the southern section. This clearly defines why the nations involved were not so concerned with the geographical dimensions of Israel. They never believed it would survive more than a couple of weeks!
        4. The Arab nations at that time also believed they would be the victors within a week or less. They also agreed with the United States and Britain seeing this arrangement as an easy way to tap into the financial capability of the great nations of the United States and Great Britain, hence no need for any large stretch of land for Israel. Because the land mass in their conception was sufficient for the strategic and economical ventures they had in mind.

        I understand this well be very upsetting to those who have been taught differently, but allow me to point out several verifying factors in our day and age as well. The Georgetown University Center for studies of peace in the Middle East…..Who paid for it? Who heads the educational system for all of our State department officials? With every group that is sponsored by our government on studies of the Middle East who teaches and heads up those divisions? How many translators doers the United States military have enlisted who were trained to speak Arabic? And why are we depending on Iraqi’s to serve as translators in Iraq? Do our Military undergo any type of training as to the customs and mentality of the Arabic speaking people? Very little to none! I could write a book in explanation of why all of this is the way it is, however this is not my objective.

        Now lets venture to the incident of the USS Liberty that everyone is talking about!

        First I will enter this snake pit by making some commentary! I have read many of the comments made recently about the USS Liberty issue, however I have to snicker at the innocence of people to believe what they have read or been told, much of which defies logic!

        1. Did you know that when this incident of the USS Liberty came up in confrontation between the United States and Israel, The United States was asked by Israeli intelligence if they would desire for the pilot radio logs and the intercepted radio transmissions as recorded to be made public in order to clarify the matter? The reaction was to sweep everything diplomatically under the carpet. Why? Maybe there were some intelligence matters being transferred to the Egyptians? Israel was in a eminent struggle for survival and had no alternative but to stop the source of intelligence to the Egyptians!
        2. I ask when did the United States sweep under the carpet any attack on any American military vessel? Why, when and for what reasons?
        3. When in the history of the United States did any diplomatic connection become stronger and not weaker after such an incident?

        Listen and understand Iran or Chavez are not the greatest enemies of the United States, and this administration is in parallel operation with the enemies of everything you may think you stand for! Democrats and Republicans alike! The liberals will only imprison you, and the moderate conservatives will only take longer to do the same! The United States is in a downward spin that the present system cannot apprehend. As a matter of fact the two only real allies the United States has ever had, and the only two countries who have every paid back their debts are Taiwan and Israel and yet have been repeatedly stabbed in the back with the diplomatic process of the liberal administration of the United States Government.
        Israel is much the same, the Zionist and liberals are the biggest enemies Israel has and they were from the beginning until now. There is only one way to survive this system of Intelligence and Mis-Intelligence and that is to start over with new people with new objectives and a vision…as it is written ” the people who have no vision will perish!” Shimon Perez and Obama would be even thought to be of the same family, both see history as they wish, both want to remain in power even if it tears the very core of the countries apart, and devaluate everything they both stand for. Our politicians have no vision and we will perish as a nation if we cannot produce a complete change of government and establish a government that serves the people and not a political agenda! ” the people that have no vision will perish!”

        • ANTICRIME

          @Southerner, Very interesting post, my friend! ~ But it was the Johnson Administration that should have caught the retribution…NOT our men on the U.S.S. Liberty who suffered such a savage attack for following orders from DC!

  • mikeledo

    One reason why he won’t win: He won’t get enough votes.

    • Willy

      HE won’t with an attitude like that.

    • Insurgent

      Especially since the Chicago punk-puffing gangster has the machines rigged !!!!

    • KH

      That’s because America is filled with historical, economical, and constitutionally illiterate Americans.

      • wireline

        right again

        • Chad

          Thank you KH.. Was thinking the same thing.

      • Brady

        Well said…KH !!

      • kellys

        You are absolutely right, Americas biggest failure as a nation.

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        This is absolutely the most truthful statement to be found anywhere on the Internet.

  • WTF

    I’m for Ron Paul.

    • Red

      He is not a serious candidate. He is enjoying the turmoil he is helping to create amoung the candidates and the publicity it is giving his Libertarian “movement” which his son, Ran, will now lead.

      • Chad

        Not Serious? Open your eyes!

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        You’re dreaming, oh thou with the sawed-off brain.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Paul even has a hard time answering a Constitutional question put to him by Newt. He reads it very nicely but with no understanding morals or ethics. He also needs to brush up on the Bill of Rights and the position of all the founding fathers also read the Federalist Papers.

        • Willis

          Hey John,

          I think I’ll vote for Santorum now.

          F’n Ha Ha.

  • Tom

    I wouldn’t vote for Ron Paul for dog catcher. He belongs back in the 60′s and 70′s with the “peacenik” movement. I had NO use for them and have even LESS use for him.

    • KH

      That’s because you’re a moron and wouldn’t know the Constitution if it bit you on the ass.

      • wireline

        nor does he really care, that would take some effort on his party

        better to leave him in his ignorant bliss, product of our public skool (fool) system

      • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

        Now, now, K.H.! Please be nice! Tom has an opinion, as you have!

      • Brady

        KH- LOL !! Oh my god you are so funny and right on !!

    • Roy

      You don’t know any thing about him

  • Judith

    Pray that God will have mercy on our country and help us get out of the mess we are in.

    • GDC

      Prayer IS a delusion!

      • Insurgent

        Contrary to GDC———————–God Bless America—–we need your help more than ever!!!

      • Ron

        I beg to differ with you. It you haven’t tried PRAYER then you don’t know what it can and will do for a person. I suggest that you really, really try it before you open your mouth!

        • Average Joe

          It will be better to beleive and be wrong than not to beleive and be wrong

      • Southerner

        God will not fix what we are able to do on our own people! Ron Paul is not the answer and never has been! Who are you going to pray to when his favored policy towards understanding Iran???? coupled with his anti- Israel and isolationist views puts the Terrorist on you door step????

        • KH

          Where were you when Kim Il Sung was rumored to get the bomb for North Korea? Where was your gnashing of teeth? The fact is he got it and there was nothing the US could do about it and he never used it like American leaders said he would.

          It’s asinine to start WWIII by trying to prevent WWIII and that’s what would happen if the US starts another unconstitutional war with Iran.

          • Southerner

            KH……. so why are you voting for Ron Paul?????

        • wireline

          “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
          John Adams 2nd US President 1797-1801

          Even the founders conceded this point, think we still have that today?

        • Patriot 101

          The united States has no constitutional authority (short of a declaration of war) to bomb another country. THIS IS WHAT RON PAUL ADVOCATES!
          If the American people (thorough congress) declare war on Iran, RON PAUL, as commander in Chief would engage, destroy the enemy and return our troops home.
          There is no appetite for more endless wars in this country! If you want a war, LETS HAVE THAT DEBATE IN CONGRESS AND DECLARE IT!

        • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason

          Ron Paul is not anti-Israel or isolationist. You don’t know what you are talking about. Not a clue!

          • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason

            Ron Paul is the one who supported Israel when they wanted to bomb Iraq’s nuclear facilities.

          • Average Joe

            Exsactly how many ICBMs dose Iran have? Non thats the latest estament so how is Iran going to use A nuke on America? They aer not they may drive one down to Isreal and set it off but the retalleashion will wipe Iran off the face of the planet. We will not raise A finger or push A button and we will be held blameless.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Paranoid, paranoid, paranoid. Put the blanket over your head, suck your thumb and shiver with fright. Poor, dumb SOB.

      • Ernie

        That’s what they said about Noah, until it started to rain

        • Dundee

          Excellent comment. God said if we would repent and TURN FROM our wicked ways, He would heal our land and bless us again… Maybe for as many as 10, as in Lot’s day…

      • Rubin

        NO, You are the delusion, Prayer is faith and faith stands tall! Maybe one of these other Liberals is a lot more for you! We The People is all based on faith!

      • bullrider

        So is the idea that all life on Earth, from redwood trees to elephants to bacteria – all sprang from some amino acids on an asteroid, and just ‘evolved’ with the passage of time.

        That makes the one about giving a monkey a typewriter and he’ll type the works of Shakespeare actually seem possible. If you don’t want to believe in God then that’s fine but perhaps consider ‘just don’t know’ instead of assuming you have to ascribe to the other, at-least-as-hard-to-believe position of evolution.

      • Willis

        Following Christ is the reason we live. Prayer is necessary.

        Jesus is the Great Liberator.

        That’s where I ideologically break from politics.

    • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

      Judith, You have the right answer, Lady!

  • Straight Shooter

    The press has been saying that Ron Paul wants to legalize all drugs, prostitution, abortion, gay marriage and worse. What a lie! Ron Paul clearly says, “The President of the US has NO CONSTITUTIONAL right to be involved in these matters. These decisions were given, by the constitution, to the States. The people of each STATE must choose!” This is democracy as our constitution defines it. This prevents Statism, Tyranny and Large Scale abuses of our liberties, such as forcing people to pay or support or buy things or people they do NOT want or agree with!

    • Carol Fryer

      Its what they do…..take everything out of context to let people hear only what they want them to hear.

    • Rubin

      You are completly correct! I cant stand reading some of this garbadge that these sheeple right, They are not happy unless thay have there Bush, Clinton, or Barry taking there rights away…

    • Jim

      Exactly correct, the federal government wasn’t ever suposed to have power over the states, it was suposed to be the uniting force and the group leader, not the master!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Yes all you Paul bots are like children in a candy store and your Uncle Paul will give you all you want and in fact he will shove it down your throats just like Obama will not give you any. Same coin different faces same problems no immigration drugs allowed the basic chaos and anarchy that the libertarians believe in.

      • KH

        And all you neocons are morons. You claim you want this country to follow the constitution and you want the government out of your lives but yet you don’t mind the government regulating marriage, drugs, and counterfeiting money to sustain an unsustainable military in which to start unconstitutional wars. You’re a lemming. Turn off O’Reilly and Hannity. Read some history. Learn the Constitution. Take an economics class and quit showing your ignorance.

        • wireline

          I really feel for the KH to believe the garbage being spewed from MSM on the tube everyday and the believe it so fervently too.

          really sad

        • wireline

          really feel for “them” I meant to say, sorry for the typos

        • wireline

          you know there was a lot of resistance for the founders also KH, if they had gotten their way, we would all still be paying fealty to our king or queen,

          most of their society at the time thought it was so very wrong to overthrow their king, seems like we are faced with almost the same thing today. they are the loyalists of our time

        • Brady

          KH- I really love your comments,they are right on !

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Don’t have to shove freedom and liberty down my throat, but probably your’s because you like the taste of bulls&%t rather than the sweet taste of truth. Fool.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          And the truth is if you want to look in history that Paul on so many levels is a certified fruit cake

          • Willis

            Little John is getting crunk on the blog.

            What What?

  • GDC

    Ron Paul IS absolutely PSYCHOTIC!

    • Insurgent

      And what is the Kenyan chigger?

    • Freeme

      and for YOU GDC….unable to SEE, HEAR or THINK, what does that make YOU???

    • Rubin

      Yes, If you love the constitution and the liberties that the fore fathers brang to us then you would be a idiot to even say that. You must be a liberal scum bag that hates this country! You could have no other reasoning to make that statement….

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Oh I love the Constitution all right but the documents that Paul touts are the libertarian version something the founding fathers warn against as much as tyranny

        • ANTICRIME

          JG, Give us an example of Ron Paul’s “Libertarian version” of our U.S. Constitution, my friend! ~ Back-up what you post or it means nothing other than your personal deluded opinion!

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Not a problem now listen child. Paul has just said that killing a sciencetist that was advancing Irans nuclear program that they have repeatedly said that they will use was terrorism. Sheer stupidity terrorism is when a target is destroyed that has no military value or threat to instill fear. The person doing the advancement was killed no other. Paul would be an isolationist or non-interventationlist same thing he can not even define terrorism much like Obama

          • ANTICRIME

            @JG, WHAT does your post say that has ANYTHING to do with Ron Paul and our U.S. Constitution???!

            Since you brought up the assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist, conducted by the Israeli Mossad, it WAS an act of terrorism to terrify other nuclear scientists within Iran to stop developing nuclear weapons!

            Iran is a sovereign country and there has been no official declaration of war from either Israel or the USA!

            Bottom line; Ron Paul is RIGHT in his comment on that incident!

          • ANTICRIME

            @JG, ADDENDUM; I forgot to mention to you that there is a BIG difference between being an ISOLATIONIST and a NON-INTERVENTIONIST….they are NOT the same or there would only be ONE term!

            To help with you confusion; an ISOLATIONIST believes in having noting to do with any other country but their own, whereas a NON-INTERVENTIONIST, like George Washington and Ron Paul believe in having trade relations with other countries but NOT to get involved in their internal affairs!
            Oh, by the way, I’m probably old enough to regard you as a child, my friend!

            ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • Kelly O’Flynn

      He is at that! Talk about DANGEROUS MINDS!

    • KH

      I think O’Reilly or Hannity is on right now.

      • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason

        Who owns the station that O’Reilly and Hannity is on? Oh, that would be Mitt.

        • CJ

          Yes, Bain Capital owns Clear Channel.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Yeah! I want that psychotic in the white house.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      If by psychotic you mean 100% constitutional, a man of integrity, a man of honor, not in the hip pocket of the globalists like the rest of the candidates, then I agree. Ron Paul is absolutely psychotic.

  • Carol Fryer

    The most irritating thing the GOP is trying to pull over our eyes is that he is unelectable. They did this last election too. And even when hes in second place or it seems hes winning, they keep the retoric going. Its sickening. All that means is they dont like him one bit. Duh. They think people are that stupid. Well, some are. lol Hes my choice no matter what. Ill write him in.

    • http://AOL MIKE C.

      Look Paul has said he will not run and can’t see himself running as an independant. I take him on his word. But he should have a big voice to the party platform, how the campaign and policy is to present and enact and he should have heavy influence to the persuasion of how the candidate runs. This I am all for and most reasonable people should be. Isn’t it unbeleivable that there is not a single democrat wanting to stoke the fire and challenge Obama toward the center, speaks volumes to how radical the democrats have become…they are not your great aunt’s democratic party anymore and I’d say some old style competent dems are turning in their graves the last 3 years.

      • wireline

        they fear a voice that speaks of liberty and freedom

        they fear even more that the idea might catch on

        so dangerous is right

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        They better let him have a voice at the convention. Don’t forget how despicable the GOP has behaved. Remember 2008, they wouldn’t even let him in the door. They deserve extinction, yet Paul is still willing to give them another chance.

    • Ed

      And that will help put Odumbo back in. God help us if that happens!

  • http://AOL MIKE C.

    You know a Romney -Paul ticket would make the dems feel something dingle down their legs…and it is not from excitement. Won’t happen, but boy would it be fun to watch…could you imagine Paul looking at Biden in debate and say “are you serious”? Just hilarious.

    • Chad

      LOL.. The Dems would pee their pants! hehe

      • Ann in Nebraska

        I think they’d do more than just pee their pants! They’d probably have to shake the brown stuff out of their shorts, too! Love that Mike C! He’s a funny guy and I really like him! A Romney-Paul ticket would be really fun to watch and vote for!

  • Straight Shooter

    Ron Paul is a vote for liberty.

    • http://NA Don Joyner

      Yes and the best second in command would be Jesse Ventura and Rand Paul in 3rd place.

  • CaptTurbo

    God Speed Dr. Paul!

  • azwayne

    Be prepared, Ron PAul is the most correct of any we’ve seen yet. Be ready and get educated. Also be ready the liberal Republican party will not allow, so there is going to be CONSERVATIVE third party.

    • Winghunter

      Yeah, why don’t you get educated??

      Ron Paul & the Neoliberal Re-education Campaign http://bit.ly/pTbm9w

      • Freeme

        You either have been listening to CNN or have your head stuck in the sand! Please educate yourself OUTSIDE the MSM and all the others spreading lies and RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Paul is a social progressive and not a Conservative at all nor should he ever have been considered a Republican at any time.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Right on. I don’t consider Ron Paul a Republican and thank God for that fact, as Republicans are ignoramuses one and all.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Yes just like Lincoln and Reagan both of whom Paul has denonounced . Please take your butt down to the left and the huffington post

  • David

    I would vote against Obama and if that means vote for Ron Paul I would vote for Ron Paul. But the Republican Party has a pecking order, It was Dole’s turn, Then it was McCain’s turn, now it’s Romney’s turn. Sad way to run a party.

    • kellys

      I have noticed this too, and then they wonder why they lose elections,

  • John Wayne

    Obama has been a Radical Leftist and had impacted the nation in a negative manner, the extent of which will become better known beginning in 2013. Ron Paul, is the antithesis of Obama. Paul is quite likely the only candidate with the fortitude to repair the Marxist damage that has been done. Perry could but won’t get the nomination. Romney sure won’t but is the likely nominee. Gingrich could but won’t be the nominee either. Santoram is a career politician . . . ‘Nuff said!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      But he is not. He is as radical in his notions as Obama is and in many forums further left.

    • donald

      Paul is as far to the right as obama is to the left. Neither is desireable!

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Ron Paul is 100% pro Constitutional. And, this is a bad thing, huh a**hole?

        • donald

          Limited vocabulary? Crude! Sound like a liberal democrat!

          • Pepper

            Have you read anything by “Millicent” – priceless!

  • Irv

    Anyone who is 100% for the second amendment gets my vote!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Yes but that means any one can get a weapon even those who every one would say should not have one like people who have killed others for no reason or muslims could stock pile and with their religious fervor well known for killing. The Constitution is not a suicide pact.

      • ANTICRIME

        JG, WAKE UP! ~ The unlawfull will always obtain guns to harm others! ONLY the law-abiding who abibe by laws will be at the mercy of criminals…who FEAR an armed victim!
        Bottom line: Liberalism is a mental disorder!

        • Jonathan Gartner

          No but it is still illegal and you can get caught and punished with Paul self protection until some one is killed would not exist typical libertarians

    • kellys

      That would be Dr. Paul.

  • http://www.libertyandhope.com/ xRedfoxx

    Here is a link to the Conservative Scorecard that is an easy-to-read rating of the GOP candidates on conservative issues. Ron Paul ranks very high!!

    http://www.conservativescorecard.com/

    I think it’s time we unite behind him and we take Obama down!!

    • Millicent

      Ron Paul is just plain rank

      • Pepper

        Ranking much higher than you ever will, offal-brain!

        offal offal offal
        Thanks Millicent for teaching me a new word
        offal offal offal

    • Jonathan Gartner

      And last in immigration

  • Almost Always Right

    Ron Paul is a joke. And not even a funny one. Just pathetic.

    • Insurgent

      But much better than a Kenyan chigger !!!!

      • donald

        Yup!

    • Mutt

      You chose a good name, “Almost always right”. You’re sure wrong on Ron Paul! People who dis Ron Paul are just plain un-American. You don’t believe in the constitution or the bill of rights! Maybe we can use the FEMA camps after Mr. Paul becomes president and round up all the ignorant assholes and place them there so they don’t contaminate the gene pool anymore! A misplaced vote for ANY other candidate is a continuation of the Bush/Cheney globalist cabal!

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Oh really I have watched this nut case for 30 years and have used him as an example of how not to read the Constitution. Now I have served for over 25 years as a Army Officer and Intell specialist on setting up freedom for people around the globe. I have found that the interpetations of a document are as important as the document itself. Paul is amoral he reads without understanding or the morals and ethics that the founding fathers also gave us. But, this is no surprise he has been doing it for so long. The main problem comes in that the Constitution has been misused and ignored that anyone waving it gains supporters.

        • ANTICRIME

          @JG, GIVE US ONE example of Ron Paul’s misinterpretation of our U.S. Constitution; surely after watching him for 30 years you can fill this small request, my friend

          • Jonathan Gartner

            Easily the Constitution has never said that we should not have allies around the world Paul has and would shrink us to dangerous levels. The founding fathers did not want us to get into something that did not benefit us. Iraq and Afghanistan have both benefited us may be not today not tomorrow but once a people has tasted freedom they want it again. This is a deliberate and immoral and unethical and against what the founding fathers wanted. They based the Constitution very much on the Bible read Matt 5:14. In essence not helping others when we can and should is just as Un-Constitutional as anything that Obama has done and Paul will do.

      • wireline

        its because they like the status quo and it scares them that Ron Paul would tear down what the oligarachy has given us

      • donald

        No, Mutt – People who “dis” Paul are rational individuals who have spent some time researching the candidates!

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Bravo!

    • http://NA Don Joyner

      You best take a long slow look in the mirror bottom feeder.

    • Ron

      Ron Paul will close the borders and not take your guns away, he will abolish Qbama care and bring our country back. He is going to phase out the IRS. His son is a congressman. My vote is for Ron Paul.

    • ANTICRIME

      @Almost Always Right,…..THIS is one time that you are WRONG, my friend!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • paulsupporter onceagain

    in this household we will all write in Paul’s name. There is no other candidate that is for the people as Paul is.

    The elites own the media. The sheeples listen to t.v. for their news. And the sheeples are falling out of the middle class daily. We all know someone unemployed for over a year.

    • Ed

      Why not just vote for Odumbo if you are going to write in Paul. Same result!!!

      • Stan

        My family will write in Ron Paul if he is not the Republican candidate.We feel that he is the best and only choice.If the Republican party is to evil to back the only true conservative,then this is what happens.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Boy you have been brain washed next you will set up an altar to him in your home

          • Mundus Vult Decepi

            Well, God Bless Ron Paul.

          • ANTICRIME

            @JG, Ron Paul’s supporters are NOT brainwashed, they are simply BETTER INFORMED on their U.S Constitution and our founder’s words than you are, my friend!

            ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

        • Chad

          Us too.. Stay strong Stan!

        • donald

          That’s a good way to keep obama, Stan!

          • Chad

            Obama – RINO… Whats the difference?

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        You’re full of crap, Ed.

      • ANTICRIME

        @Ed, WHAT PLANET do you live on????!!! ~ The closest to a GOP “Obama” would be a RINO like Mitt Romney who is all for socialized medicine, gun control and….BIG GOVERNMENT!

        • Jonathan Gartner

          No Paul is. His libertarian views are very close to marxism. Same coin different sides

  • wendy

    RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT

    • Red

      May as well keep Obama, if that is the choice. Either will strip the military, abandon our allies, open our borders, legalize drugs, and blame America for most of the world’s problems.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Yes and most people do not or will not realize that is the out come of his policies. In this Obama and Paul are the same coin different faces

      • donald

        No way, Red. Paul may be the least desireable of the conservative candidates, but he’s still better than obama!

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Consider political standing like a circle. Obama is far to the left or at the bottom of the circle Paul is the same way all the way to the right. Neither is good for US

          • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

            This is pure nonsense. No way pure freedom and pure state control coincide in any belief system or geometric pattern.

  • Justwonderingwhy!

    Ron would be a Great President, if his foreign policy didn’t sink so bad. I would jump on his band wagon in a heart beat if he would back all of our allaies, but he will not and he believes our enemies, need nuke power, not to produce electricity like they say, but to let them create their own bomb. The enemy will not use caution with that newly created bomb, but not only mass produce it, but use it as well, to create another World War…..

    • Stan

      You are distorting what he said,just like the news media.You should stop watching the news and check out Ron Paul’s positions elsewhere.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        How about the words out of his own mouth considering the killing of a scientist that would advance weapons that the state of Iran would use in a heart beat as stated policy against every/any one as a terrorist. A terrorist is a person or group that kills or destroys things that have no military usage. In other words it is indiscriminate killing women children ect during a time where war is not declared. Killing the Scienctest was not an act of terrorism period.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Who is provoking whom? Who is poking a stick in sovereign foreign countries eyes? Wake up asshole.

  • HUMPY

    ron paul is the single most dangerous man in the USA worse than what we have now

    if he is elected start building a bomb shelter for your family !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • donald

      Maybe not worse, but certainly just as scary – Particularly since he thinks since Israel has nuclear weapons it’s OK for Iran to also have nuclear weapons – said this in every debate!

      • Chad

        Yes, Because we all know that Isreal would never use any of it’s hundreds of Nukes to defend itself.

    • Chad

      So true, could you amagine being freed from gov regulation, having more freedom and having to take care of ourselves???…EWWWWWWWWWWWW

    • Ron

      You are what your name is. Go Ron Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Hehehehehehehehehe. It’s great to know there are so many assholes on this site, of which you are one of the biggest.

    • ANTICRIME

      @HUMPY, YES, I agree that he is the most “dangerous man”….to the Communist-”Progressive” movement that is destroying our country, my friend!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • Dianna

    We can not afford to have Ron Paul as the nominee. Obama will walk all over him. He doesnt see the Obama for who and what he is and Obama base will crush Ron. Then we are stuck with the biggest scam artist in american history. We can no affrod to have Obama again. We can not have Ron Paul as the nominee. We need to get the US back from Obama destruction.

    • Mutt

      And how do you plan to “get the country back” if you’re against Ron Paul. The answer is staring you in the face dumbass! I’m really getting sick of all of you mindless morons!!

      • donald

        Name calling and vulgarisms put you right out there with liberal democrats – and shows a definite limited vocabulary!

        • Joseph C Moore, USN Ret

          Polite whitewashing does not change the facts. I agree with Mutt.

          • Mutt

            Thank you Joseph. I usually refrain from mudslinging but the stupidity is piling up in epic proportions here!

          • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

            History will prove that Mutt is correct on this one.

      • ANTICRIME

        @Mutt, They only prove that there is no need to rig the elections as long as the national media does a good enough job at screwing-up the minds of what they HOPE will be a majority!

        Bottom Line: The Nov 2012 election will show if America is dominated by a majority of informed WISE….or gullible FOOLS!

        ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

    • kellys

      Obama cant even speak without a teleprompter, I do not fear Obama, its the ignorance of Americans that bothers me.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      WRONG!!!!!! Ron Paul is the only viable GOP candidate, and you are so stupid it is beyond words.

    • ANTICRIME

      @Dianna, Go back to sleep dear….you are TOO FAR gone, my friend! A sure case of TV-Zombieism!!!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • http://www.libertyandhope.com/ xRedfoxx

    Here is a link to the Conservative Scorecard that is an easy-to-read rating of the GOP candidates on conservative issues. Ron Paul ranks very high!!

    I think it’s time we unite behind him and we take Obama down!!

    • http://www.libertyandhope.com/ xRedfoxx

      oops…no links allowed. conservativescorecard dot com

    • Red

      Ron Paul is not a conservative! He has written nine books extolling Libertarianism and promoting very liberal ideas.

      • Stan

        And believing in Liberty and personal freedom is not conservative????You sir are the slave to the media,and big Government.

      • http://NA Don Joyner

        Libertarianism has nought any connection with Liberalism our original form of government was Libertarian not socialistic Liberalism.

      • wireline

        so did the founders of this nation

        very radical ideas for its time, but surely you know this already if you know your Early American/U.S. history

        you do don’t you?

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        And, thank God for that.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      And last in immigration take a complete look something Paul bots do not wish for any one to do.

  • Barbara

    Although I would love to see the Senate and Congress rally behind Ron Paul as President, I don’t think it would happen. A president can only do so much. I would love to see Newt in office but his racist remarks will blemish his credibility-maybe a vice prez position with all of his knowledge. As for Romney-he had his chance to shine last election. His cronies are too deeply embedded in his political stance that he will be no better than who is in office now. Santorum has moral values and good judgement. Huntsman is off shooting in another field. Isn’t there anyone out there to lead this great country?

    • Chad

      What RP wants to do doesn’t need congress aproval. He can clean up alot of garbage without any help. Look at what bumer is doing without help, if he just undo whats been done this yr would be a giant help.

  • Maxine

    I will vote for Ron Paul and no one else he is for the people and he wants to get are country back where it belongs they are all scared to death of him they will lie do anything they can to stop him the libs and the rinos so stand behind him we need him bad

  • Scott C in Spring Tx

    I just want to encourage each and every person who plans on casting a vote in the 2012 Presidential election to spend a couple of hours at their computer or at the computer of their local library researching these candidates for themselves. The rhetoric has been overwhelming by the media and the feedback on these blogs. I am not going to give a yea or nay opinion in this response even though I do have an opinion. My opinion has been reached through personal research, doing fact finding, reading candidates web sites and comparing what they are saying to their public record. Look at how often they vote on all the issues. What issues do they avoid voting on? Does their campaign platform line up with their voting record? How often are they absent from the chair they have been elected to fill? Please folks, this is worth your time. It takes a little personal sacrifice but our future and the future of our nation is worth it.

    • Insurgent

      And you make it sound like the Chicago punk-puffing gangster does not have the voting machines rigged !!!

    • Ron

      This is the best advice I have seen on any comment section about elections. Scott C is right. I have been doing this for years and have taught my whole family how to do it and they do. It is not that HARD folks, just takes a little time. You also have to want to take this Great Country AMERICA, back to where it should be, the way our Founding Fathers set it up to be. Go to DC serve your term, then go back home, not stay for centuries. Uphold the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Take no money from anyone to win an election. So, YES study the canidates and their background before going to vote, but DO VOTE!. Gob Bless America!

    • Southerner

      Scott C in Spring Tx….People will not do what you are asking to be done! They fall in blindly behind one candidate and follow their blogs blindly. Because people who are in desperation want to believe that what they are following is right! I have seen it in ever theater of the world I have operated in. The problem is people seem to get hooked on the mindless ranting of certain expressions like “Constitutionalist” when in reality the fathers of this country made it super clear in their writings they did not think highly of anyone who was career politician!
      I cannot comprehend why anyone would even begin to conceive of Ron Paul being president if they only considered a person who has been in politics for over 30 years only passed two bills in his whole career and yet he will be able to run the nation???? The sad reality is the congress will run over him like road kill !
      If he really stands for anything worth voting for he would be focused on giving the American people a clean voting system and State panel approved absentee voting! The most prominent issue before America is the Voter Citizenship Verification that should be done in person! Why don’t you Ron Paul supporters wake up and ask yourself that Question “Why has he not done anything about this? If you think that a 30.4 % absentee vote is acceptable as it was in 2008, then this would explain why you are blindly willing to vote for Ron Paul instead of having someone like Col. Allen West or Governor Nikki Haley! We need someone who will not be road kill for congress, but we also need a candidate who is not part of the Boy’s Club on the Hill!

      • donald

        Hopefully, Scott, you speak for most Texans!

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        If Ron Paul runs into complete gridlock with congress, and absolutely nothing gets done for four years, it’s still a hell of a lot better than what is happening now.

    • donald

      If more people, like you, Scott, would do a little research instead of just listening to the rhetoric, we wouldn’t have obama!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      You write well and give others choices good for you. I may not agree with everything you think but, that is part of democracy in a representive Republic. Beware of Paul bots because logical discussion is contary to their rants and raves and dismissal of his record on being a libertarian

  • Otto Schaden

    Will his running mate be Helen Thomas or Cindy Sheehan? Does Paul have any Soros support?
    He should, based on some of his major anti-US issues.

    • Straight Shooter

      The constitution should not be radical to Americans. It is what this country fought for– Freedom from taxes! Freedom from government intrusion! Freedom from Government abuses and Searches without warrants! Freedom to defend ourselves! Freedom to speak ones view point! Freedom to choose our own officials! What has happened to America?????

      • Chad

        They have become dependant on the gov babysitting and breastfeeding them, instead of having free will and self reliance.

    • kellys

      What are these anti US issues? I noticed you were quick to slander but not near as adept at supporting your point.

  • Myra Ann

    Ron Paul could NEVER beat Obama. Sad but true!! If we do not want Obama for another four years we must vote for someone who can beat him. I am a Democrate but will not vote for Obama. You are very wrong about Mitt! He is the only one who has created jobs and he is the only one who can Beat Obama. Mitt is not perfect but we are in real trouble and my party does not seem to care. I will always vote for the one who is for the American people and I don’t care if he is a Dem. or a Rep.. Mitt created over 80,000 jobs here in my state just in one company. Obama has never even had a job!! He was just an Organizer for Acron.

    • http://sassyhen@sccc.tv Davis

      Well said Lady! You are using your head beside something to hang a hat! If we all used our heads rather than being led by a bunch of Rag Heads and the such, This great Nation would not be in the shape that it is in! To all! we have to get this Rag Head Loving Monster out of office as soon as possible. Make a wise decision when you vote. “Obama Must Go!!!
      “Nuff Said”!

  • Jay

    Ron Paul is not electable. He’s a kook and a naive one at that. He is however paving the way for his son who will be a viable candidate in the future.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      “Ron Paul is not electable. He’s a kook and a naive one at that.” That’s right, Jay, repeat the Nazi propaganda that you hear on your Nazi propaganda shows, because you don’t have the where-with-all nor the due diligence to do your own research. You along with your Nazi propaganda “news” shows are becoming less and less significant with each passing day.

  • Ron Clark

    The only halfway imaginable scenario that would include Paul is a Romney/Paul ticket. At least Paul could out-nut Biden in a debate (in a good way of course), which would be must-see TV and something akin to ‘Pols Gone Wild.’

  • paul fortugno

    concerned american: will you kindly list evidence supportiing any of you idiotic bs

  • Red

    Ron Paul can’t carry Texas, much less win the nomination

    • donald

      You’re right. Most of here in Texas would not support him – Unless, of course, he turns out to be the only alternative to obama.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      You’re dead wrong and the Texas caucus will prove me right and you full of crap.

      • donald

        Well, mundus vult decepi, you’re probably the crudest contributer here. Sound just like the liberal democrats – limited vocabulary, just crude and vulgar offerings!

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Thank you. I take pride in my crudeness, when dealing with complete morons.

  • Quinn

    Sorry, Paul pushers, this is the old boy’s last hurrah ….
    We need a Republican in the White House, but it’s not Dr. Paul.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Screw the Republicans. Let’s get someone who respects and defends the Constitution in the White House and I don’t give a damn what party he comes from.

    • Willis

      Another one won’t win.

      Sorry to burst your bubble.

      Its Paul or Obama; face it.

  • Bob Marshall

    Go to Council on Foreign Relations site and see who they are behind. “it is not the votes that count, it is who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin.

  • Mmort

    Only the independents, that are really Libs, would vote for Ron Paul. They know he is so far out of normal comprehension that he could never win against Obama’s only talent- Speech.

    • Winghunter

      Mischief Voters Push Paul To Front Of GOP Race
      http://bit.ly/soNidH

    • Mutt

      obama only has that “talent” when the teleprompters are running. Have you ever seen him answer spontaneous questions? Ron Paul would make him look like the blooming idiot he is in a debate!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Right being consistently 100% pro constitution is “out of normal comprehension”. And you lady are gigantic douche bag.

  • Elwood

    So, the author of this piece says there are six reasons why Ron Paul can and will be elected. Well, I say there is one reason he can’t and won’t be elected. His age has caught up with him. Why, the man is almost as old as I am. Enough said!

    • Bon

      Agree!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Age doesn’t have a damn thing to do with it, you fool.

      • Ann in Nebraska

        Mundus Vult Decepi, I agree with you 100%. Dr. Paul is in way better shape physically and mentally than most of the blathering fools on here. I’d actually prefer to have someone with a little age on him. Ron Paul 2012!

  • T-Texas

    I am taking another look at Perry.He knows the in and out of running a large economy (TX 13th b biggest in the world)lower taxes get government out of the way,pro constitution.What I don’t like about Perry is his stance on illegal’s children being supported on my dime.If the parents are illegal so are the children even if the rulings say they are American citizens.

    • Winghunter

      Perry;

      * Lied to our faces about his support for TARP.
      * Called Tom Tancredo a racist for supporting the enforcement of our own immigration laws.
      * Publicly ridiculed Gov. Jan Brewer for SB1070 in trying to protect her state from being overrun by illegal aliens.
      * Signed a totally unsupervised DREAM Act in Texas and having the audacity of a dope to call Americans ‘heartless’!
      * Pushed his plan to build a US-Mexican Highway on stolen eminent domain land!

      Rick Perry not a true conservative by Tancredo http://politi.co/pv9OnW

      The Phony Right-Wing, Part 5: James Richard ‘Rick’ Perry http://bit.ly/qRJo3B

      Rick Perry’s dangerous Muslim compromise: http://bit.ly/qGCjjR

      Rick Perry AGREES with Obama: Open Borders for America http://bit.ly/qfmWli

      Rick Perry thanked by Vicente Fox for Illegals In-State Tuition (TX Dream Act) http://bit.ly/qWLDMY

      Does GOP want Perrys DREAM act too? http://bit.ly/lmyB3R

      Rick Perry’s dangerous Muslim compromise: http://bit.ly/qGCjjR

  • Bones

    Paul supporters are as ignorant as those who voted for Obama. Write-in’s will waste their vote and might as well stay home. Even Paul doesn’t expect to win. Paul supporters best learn about politics. Political ignorance is the reason Obama is where he is!

    • Winghunter

      The Ron Paul Campaign and its Neo-Nazi Supporters http://bit.ly/m1lhQ

      The Odd Alliance Supporting Ron Paul http://bit.ly/mVkXv1

    • Ron

      so is staying home and not voting…………that will put Obama back in for another 4 years…………we don’t need that!

      • Elwood

        Ron, I agree! Our best, and perhaps only, chance to beat Obummer is for all of us to unite behind whoever the Republican Party candidate may be, turn out to the polls in droves in November and VOTE! If enough of us stay at home and sulk because we aren’t in 100% agreement with the Republican nominee, BHO is reelected.

        If a third pary candidate arises the boy in the White House is reelected. We simply must persuade our friends, relatives and acquaintances that are of the same persuasion as we to VOTE! I just don’t see any other way. Another four years of what we have had for the past three and we are sunk. GONERS!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Exactly, and you exemplify political ignorance.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        And you go far beyond just political ignorance you encompass the sphere of idiocy

        • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

          Pot, meet kettle.

  • Sage

    The six reasons to elect Ron Paul don’t seem to be listed in the article; (Dr. Ron Paul: 6 Reasons He Is Electable and Will Win). However, I’m convinced Ron Paul is an honorable gentleman, but his observations on issues beyond the borders of America are rather lame, even scary.

    NOTE: The post by ‘Concerned Citizen’ does more to allienate voters than attract them. When Ron Paul supporters degrade and demean opponents with terms like Demorat and Obonzo most people will turn off and tune out.

    • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

      Because the article is copied and pasted (i.e. plagiarized, like most articles here) from somewhere else. You would need to click the link to go there and finish reading it. Since the source is HuffPo, the comments there are probably even stupider than here,if that’s even possible.

  • RC

    If ConservativeBytes really believes this, then I guess it’s another batch of e-mails destined to the spam bin.

  • Kelly O’Flynn

    THIS “conservative” sure WON’T be voting for him!!! Ron Paul is an ignorant fool and an unethical liar!!!! He’s no more a conservative Republican than Obama is. Throughout his whole campaign, he’s been leeching off the Republican party just to win the nomination. At least with Ross Perot you knew who he was and where he stood. He was “man” enough to stand on his own two feet and run as an Independent instead of hiding behind the skirts of a political party he didn’t truly adhere to. Ron Paul is a FRAUD

    • Bon

      Wow you are so right!!!

    • donald

      I don’t much care for Paul either but I don’t think he’s a fraud – just a fringe conservative. But Kelly, if by some remote chance Paul becomes the nominee, not voting for him helps obama into a second term.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      How does it feel having a skull full of feces?

      • Jonathan Gartner

        You should know through personnel experience except when spewing it in a post like this. twit

  • Joyce

    Although Ron Paul has some very good ideas which I hope are instituted, he would gut the military and make us unable to defend ourselves. Thus LIBERTY would lose. Although Ron Paul and Donald Trump are different, they both have some very good ideas, but are NOT what we need as a president. If Ron Paul runs as 3rd party, BARAK Obama is GUARANTEED to win. I think if Ron Paul and MANY of his supporters even had a 1% chance of winning the presidency with a 3rd party run, he would flush this country “down the drain” in a minute in order to try to do it.

    • donald

      You’re right. And that may be his strategy. Not to become president but to bring some of his valid ideas to the fore.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Then I say, flush away!!!

      RON PAUL 2012.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        We will make sure you go with him along with the rest of the human waste

  • Roscoe Bonifitucci

    I would vote for Daffy Duck rather than the Marxist Idiot in the White House today. While a Romney / Allen West Ticket would be best, with Paul as Secretary of Treasury and Michelle Bachman as CZAR to repeal Obamacare and Newt as Chief of Staff.

    I would still vote for and support Daffy Duck rather than the Lunatic in power today.

    • donald

      I like your choices!

  • Bon

    The people who think ron creepy paul is good for this country all need to seek help of a shrink.!! He is a very scary person. He will be worse than obummer count on it. He is a disgrace!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Oh, I’m sorry for thinking that someone with integrity, a consistent pro-constitution voting record and honor is good for this country.

      I guess I need to rethink my position and think about voting for one of the flip floppers, you know the warmongering, paranoid schizophrenic, self-serving pigs that are running on the GOP ticket.

      You’re funny Bonnie boy.

      • Joyce

        I am pro constitution. And we will lose our constitution if we don’t turn things around. However, don’t think a single one of our founding fathers would think that a militarily weak country would be have liberty honor or anything else that we desire for long.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      The Paul bots do not like either history or logic he himself has said that he is not a Conservative or a Republican. He has also disrespected both Ronald Reagan and Abe Lincoln. This is not lies or libel but what he has said out of his own mouth. He and his friends are no friends to this Republic

  • Crocodil

    Ron Paul’s timing is wrong. Ron would had been a dandy president back in ’64 instead of LBJ. If so, we wouldn’t have the monstrous national debt and liberal control of the educational system we now face.
    Today Ron is not the man, the nation is far too weak and sick for his medicine to work. His “cold turkey” policy would only kill the fragile patient.
    Sadly, Paul’s boy scout honesty does not stand a chance against the communist obama’s chicago politics. Paul should step down and let an electable RINO displace obama.
    The best we can hope for is that the nation might survive another decade with a RINO, but will certainly perish with the flag hating, fascist, baby murdering obama.

    • donald

      Correct! And he certainly would have been far better than LBJ!

  • http://AOL MIKE C.

    Representative Joe Wilson on Fox right now endorsing Romney….I’ve spend sometime with Joe at a Gamecock-Vol game in a suite, this guy is such a REAL American if he is endorsing Romney, he means it. The guy is as straight a shooter you will find. He told a friend of his that when he told Obama “YOU LIE” during the State of the Union it just blurted out like someone else was yelling from his gut out….Joe is the guy who with 2 words started this country to waking up, a true American. If he wants Mitt, so should alot of you. The goal of all of us should be electability this time, if Romney gets it I can’t see the House or Senate republican leaders letting him get away with any too moderate stances. That is something all of you should keep in mind. The object is to get the best person on top of the ticket to defeat Obama, period.

    • John Jensen

      If you are a teal true American as I. I am a Vetrean which I know Vetreans will not vote for Ron Paul, I am a Patriot who trust the Bill of Rights and the Constutation and Know all that do will not Vote for Ron Paul. He will do the following, Get rid of our Military Strenget. Limit the second admendment. He will not close down the unwanted Goverment services loke the EPA, and dept of Education. HE IS A DICTATOR saying do it my way or hit the Highway.
      ACUTALLY WE DO NOT HAVE ANYONE IN THE POLITICAL THAT A TRUE AMERICAN CAN TRUST NO MATTER THRIE PARTY DMC OR GOP. WE NEED TO FIND A INDEPENDENT WITH NO POLITICAL TIES THAT WILL FOLLOW THE FATHERS OF THIS GREAT LAND BEFORE WE LOSE IT AND HAVE A NOTHER CIVIL WAR. That’s what is really needed > Wake Up Fools. A Politican will KILL AMERICA LIKE OBAMA is trying to do.
      Thanks for the time John Jensen, Be Safe Be Strong and stop letting OBAMA say SHUT UP
      and SIT DOWN.

      • Patriot 101

        How could you possibly be so mis-informed?
        Romney is Obama lite (light?); a War Party candidate that has pledged war with Iran.
        Just what America needs! Another endless, winless war in a God forsaken desert half way around the world.
        Another massive invasion force on the same scale as the Iraq invasion. Remember we gotta have “boots on the ground” to find the bad guy and the supposed weapons! Then we kill the bad guy, not find any weapons of mass destruction (Really weapons of mass delusion!). Then print up another Trillion or so worthless dollars to fund this war, and go on from there?
        More blown to heck soldiers, more dead, more just plain screwed up for life. For What?
        You tell me….

        • Jonathan Gartner

          As for weapons of mass destruction let me introduce you to some Kurds they might want a word with you. As for nukes we know a convoy shortly before the fall went into Syria with radioactive materials giving off the signature of nuke materials. This is all common knowledge . Paul would end our alliances and our ability to hit the problems out side this country. Unlike Paul I have actually been in the field and cold with cold rations. I have put my nutts on the line more than once and have no problems doing it again. I will never vote for some one like Paul and neither will any one under my command they know better

  • David

    On domestic and monitory issues Paul has some excellent perspectives, and could serve his Country best in such cabinet or advisory positions.
    Paul’s view on the military role of the United States is almost as naive as Obama’s.

    • mr bad example

      BINGO! spot on, well said!

      • Tony

        A complete foreign policy disaster. Chamberlain said “I have a piece of paper from Chancellor Hitler…we will have peace”. I cannot believe thant anyone can believe that retreat from American bases overseas will engender peace. The enemies are at the gates: global Islamists, resurgent neo Sovietism & Marxism in Europe. Ron Paul is a fool and so are his believers in literal libertarianism.

    • donald

      VERY well put, and spot on!

    • Joyce

      Sounds good to me.

    • howzzat

      I maintain that a strong conservative congress could mitigate many of paul’s loonier ideas.

  • Ron Bedell

    Go Ron Paul. Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate standing for the constitution and personal liberty. And Paul has a track record to back up his words. I am voting for Ron Paul!

    Romney is a big government socialist and and Internationalist. Furthermore, who can trust anything that Mitt Romney says?

    Gingrich is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Read the book The Shadows of Power by James Perloff and you will find out that the main objective of the CFR is to socialize the United States and strip the U.S. of its sovereignty and independence and get the U.S. involved in a one world government. CFR members are carefully chosen because they do believe in big government.

    Rick Santorum is another big government socialist and internationalist.

    Ron Paul for President in 2012!!!

    • Red

      He is running as a Republican, because it gives exposure to his Libertarian movement. He ran as a Libertarian in his two other failed attempts. Not a serious contender, but he is entertaining and plays well to the under 30′s crowd. In his own words, he admits to having no delusions about being nominated.

      • Pepper

        You lie!

        • Jonathan Gartner

          And you need a shave

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Not only that but, his history is catching up with him including the disrespect he has shown both Ronald Reagan and Abe Lincoln

  • mr bad example

    Ron Paul will only be elected by aliens, not mexicans, but ETs… i respect RP and his stands on certain issues, but he is as bad as obama on national issues.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      WRONG!

  • shawn corrigan

    ron paul is for real. look at his record , doubting fools think he could be a fake.
    his stance on congress taking the nation to war and putting our soldiers lives in harms way is solid. america HAS NOT DONE THIS SINCE WW2 !!
    his policy of “not being the policeman of the world is right !
    the bilderberg, tri-lateral comm. U.N. agenda 21 ,council on foreign relations agenda is what america has been following. google it ,learn it ,you will see that they are afraid of ron paul.
    you will see why that is. what they have done and are planning. it likely is to late, it is too big and too advanced , but ron paul is a light of what is right. for your own self respect ,do the right thing and fight ,(as he has done) for freedom liberty, and american honor.
    stop being educated by the enemy !! educate yourself and learn how to survive the scourge that is developing into the greatest horror the world has EVER seen. !!!! it will dwarf the sum total of all the wars combined. but i know strong educated people can survive.

    • Joyce

      Shawn, PLEASE really look at Ron Paul’s record with your eyes wide open! He lives in eutopia and that is NOT the real world.

  • Janie

    God help this country if Paul gets elected. He won’t get my vote

    • donald

      Well, Janie, I don’t think much of Paul either. But, if he, by some remote aberration, should get the candidacy, not voting for him would work toward getting obama for four more years. Some choice, huh?

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      God will help this country if Paul gets elected. He will get my vote!

  • pdol

    Watch this now and then any one of you can tell me he is crazy…..
    http://www.youtube.com/user/CollectiveCheckup

    • Pepper

      That is a very dangerous video. It contains truth which has no place in Conservate Byte blog comments.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Not a problem he is as loony as a bed bug always has been.

      • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

        Obviously only a crazy person can be that accurate.

  • Stephen

    If Romney stressed for Constitutional Principles, Limited Government, truth in foreign relations, and eliminating the Federal Reserve, would the media call him a wacko as well?

    • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

      Of course not, they all know he would change his mind soon anyway.

  • Play2k

    This election is about whether America will go ALINSKY RADICALS or not. The Candidate that figures this out will win in a landslide.
    Newt is the only one who has articulated this!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Newt is a self-serving lizard and member of the CFT, stupid.

  • Freeme

    FINALLY! A GREAT ARTICLE ON RON PAUL! It is astounding how many people have NO CLUE who he really is, what he does and what he stands for…and steadfastly over the past 20 years or more! Please compare:.
    *** Mitt Romney’s support for “RomneyCare” – which served as the model for “ObamaCare” – and the $700 BILLION TARP bailout, as well as flip-flopping on virtually every core conservative issue you can think of;

    *** Newt Gingrich’s support for the individual mandate, TARP, Nancy Pelosi’s radical “global warming” agenda, and his raking in $1.6 million from Freddie Mac to keep the housing bubble expanding;

    *** Rick Santorum’s support for forced unionism, vote to DOUBLE the federal Department of Education, and endorsing and campaigning for RINOs like Arlen Specter – not to mention his support for Medicare Part D, which added $16 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities.

  • Ron Paul Constituent

    As one of Dr. Paul’s constituents, I wish he would tell his minions that defacing public property by plastering bumper stickers on highway directional signs is not a good political tactic. The doc should certainly be aware of it — if he isn’t, he should just head west on SH332 from LJ.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      It’s called gorilla political action, you moron.

      • Pepper

        actually it’s “guerrilla” and an outstanding form of civil disobedience.

        Just like when I write “vote for Ron Paul” on all the federal reserve notes I spend.

  • Larry

    If Ron Paul wins then GOD HELP US. I can come to grips with his National policies but his foreign polices scare the heck out of me.

    • Red

      Ron Paul couldn’t win his own state much less beat Obama. He is not a serious candidate. He isn’t even a Republican, he is a Libertarian.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      God WILL help us if we elected Ron Paul, which I pray to the same God, makes happen. As far as your being scared of Paul’s foreign policies, just pull the blanket over your head, shiver like a child, suck your thumb and shut the hell up!

  • http://conservativebite AJ

    We can’t get everything we want in a candidate. I share many of the sentiments shared above, all of the candidates have there weaknesses. obozo has a billion dollars in his war chest. Think about the damage he will do, to any of the candidates. He also has the alphabet soup news channels to assist, and at no charge! Sorry Ron Paul fans, he is not polished enough, he lacks the funds, he will get destroyed in the debates, and by attack adds… Anybody but obozo, but be careful who that person is… If this obozo and his socialist/Marxist ilk retain power, we are done!!! I am on the fence with the whole pack of republican hopefuls, but when the time comes, no matter who it is I will support them. I LOVE my country, and hope to see it shine again… Please rally behind our chosen candidate, put your personal feelings behind and think of the country as a whole. This is not burger king, and we cannot have it our way… Remember what Ross Perot gave us?

    • Stan

      No,this is not burger king,but if we want the best for our country,then we have to vote for the best.Ron Paul is the very best,and that is the only vote I will cast.

      • Joyce

        Stan, If you refuse to vote for our candidate, your non vote IS a vote for Obama. Think about it. We need every vote we can get to cancel Obama votes and his voter fraud votes.

        • Mundus Vult Decepi

          Stan, if you vote for any of the GOP candidates besides Paul, your vote IS a vote for Obama. Think about it. RON PAUL 2012!

  • George E. Buttner

    We are a country of laws, ands whatever happened to that Hockey Mom, Sarah Palin? There’s my vote! An Iron woman in the White House. And why at these so called primary debates, isn’t someone asking or interested in securing our borders and deporting the 20 million illegal immigrants still flooding into our country. it there they who are stealing our JOBS…And if we are a country of laws, then why do we offer illegals who break our laws, “Amnesty?” Let’s build a fence and detention camps along the border and charge Mexico rent for housing their citizens…Then after we close our doors for awhile -
    we can roll up our sleaves and rebuild America’s infrastructure… A Patriot!

    • http://NA Don Joyner

      Amen! America could use a Margret Thacher as well.

    • Stan

      George,The feds need to let the states enact laws to make it impossible to hire illegals without suing the states.This will make the illegals go back without wasting a dime on shipping them back.We don’t need the fence,we need real government supporting the states rights.We need Ron Paul to re establish the constitution.

    • Joyce

      George,
      Right on. Although Romney is not my first choice, he HAS come out strong against illegals. If illegals lost their good paying jobs (mining, manufacturing, contruction, etc.) and couldn’t collect social services, they would SELF DEPORT. That would probably add more than 1 million jobs immediately and many people could save their homes. If the other illegals were not able to collect social services and low cost housing and be a drain on our economy, like farm workers, they would go home in the off season like they used to do.

  • Ralph

    Anyone but obama !
    Ron Paul is the only candidate that will change the status quo in Washington.
    Any other candidate will be the same crap we have been dealing with for decades.

  • 2WarAbnVet

    No true patriot can support Ron Paul. That critical element of the Constitution that he eschews is the government’s responsibility for national defense. He would decimate the military, and make America one of the weakest nations on earth. He would allow our enemies free rein to run roughshod about the world. While Obama seeks to destroy our children’s future through active measures Paul would accomplish the same outcome through inaction.

    • Patriot 101

      He will make America’s so called allies step up and defend themselves!
      He is for a strong National defense.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      National defense is not the same as pr-eemptive wars you moron. I am a true patriot and I support Ron Paul and his non-interventionist policies. And you, sir, don’t have a clue about foreign policy or anything for that matter.

  • Paladin~SUI~

    Ron Paul is a fruit cake. If he is elected his isolationism will elininate thousands if not a millions of jobs. He has no respect or fear of terrorists such as Iran or Seria which is who we mainly fought in Iraq. As a sitting US Senator he sounds woefully under informed on security matters.
    He has stated many times he has no reguard for Isreal and offers no help or hope for them if he is elected. People really need to listen objectively to what he says. As a Senator he introduced, as a matter of public record, over six hundred bills and one got passed. That says much for the respect of his peers.

    • Willis

      You are misinormed to the point I just lost my self laughing at this comment.

      Please do better next time.

    • Karl Kocher

      “Ron Paul is a fruit cake” I think you are confusing yourself with him.
      I wish he were a Senator because then there would be one more vote to the good.
      Take a look at how the “fruit cake” voted. Never to take away your rights – never to take away your money – always to protect you.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Paladin, you really are sphincter boy, huh?

      Nonintervention is NOT isolationism.
      “If he is elected his isolationism will eliminate thousands if not millions of jobs” What, are you pulling these statistics out of your rectum or just parroting what you hear on the lamestream news?
      I agree, Ron Paul has no fear of terrorists such as Iran or Syria, neither should I, and if you and your ilk weren’t such a bunch of scardy cats, neither would you.
      Ron Paul is NOT a sitting US Senator, he is a Congressman, you pathetic moron. Furthermore, his knowledge on security matters is a lot more indepth than his neocon, warmongering, treasonous counterparts.
      Regarding his failure to get his over 600 bills passed, merely illustrates the self-serving, treasonous stance his counterparts in congress take, not Dr. Paul’s inability in any manner.

      Again, Ron Paul is a CONGRESSMAN not a SENATOR.

      Perhaps you ought to get your facts straight before you broadcast your complete stupidity and incompetence regarding politics.

  • Darryl

    Ron Paul doesn’t really want to be president. He does want to influence legislation, the federal reserve (which is unconstitutional), and foreign policy. Some of his thoughts are nearly profound, others not quite so, But, he is a force to be reckoned with, even for Romney, who will be the GOP nominee. And may I add, that Romney and Paul have had a generally warm relationship. Romney has NEVER criticized Paul, and Paul has even defended Romney against the Gingrich onslaught on capitalism. So, it is safe to say that Romney would be most likely to find a place of prominence for Ron Paul in his administration. Secretary of the Treasury comes to mind, because Ron Paul said he won’t seek re-election to Congress. He would shine in that position.

    • Joyce

      Darryl, The last time I heard, about a week ago, Ron Paul said he WOULD NOT rule out a third party run. I would support Ron Paul in some cabinet position, but NOT for president.

  • eric johnson

    have never been a Paul supporter but am leaning more his direction. You must give him consistency of message and policy far and away more than any other candidate and what is needed most now in this country is major-major reform of government! With the right people surrounding him I am definitely paying attention. Romney will not get my vote

  • WildBill

    Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Sam

    Notice who published this piece: The Huff Post, a leftist entity. If 76 year-old Paul is nominated, we’d better have a young, vigorous, conservative chosen with him as VP. If Paul wins the election, I think we should let him “audit the Fed.”, and then ask him to retire.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Sammy boy, you’re a short-sighted, pathetic excuse for a man.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        And you and Paul are sorry excuses for humans

  • brian

    This article came to me via Conservativebyte.com – “Take a bite out of liberalism.” Ron Paul is not a conservative, he is Libertarian… what am I missing?

    • Stan

      Libertarians are more conservative than Republicans.

      • Pepper

        Republicans have been infiltrated by progressives. “Conservative” does not mean “perpetual war, even if it bankrupts us and our grandkids.”

      • Jonathan Gartner

        And Nazi’s

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Ron Paul has been hiding under the Republican banner for a long time. Libertarians are very much like Marxist in that they are on the fringe neither is good for the United States

  • oldtexgal

    A Ron Paul nomination, or third party run, will insure Obama’s re-election. Good Grief! THINK! Paul has been in Congress for decades, though he proposed term limits on several occasions. He would be in his late 70s, if he were elected. Anyone have a clue who his VP would be?

    I don’t believe that Congressman Paul thinks he will win either nomination or election. His goal is to either use his delegates to impact the Republican platform, or God forbid, mount a third party run. How well did that serve American conservatives when Ross Perot split the conservative vote and gave us Bill Clinton?

    Obama would beat Ron Paul like a drum in a general election. Don’t let that happen!!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Obama wound NOT beat Ron Paul like a drum in a general election. Without his talking points and his teleprompter he is like a monkey out of the jungle. Ron Paul would beat the snot out of Obama in a debate and anyone who thinks differently really has a skull full of monkey dump.

  • Paladin~SUI~

    The President is not supposed to be “for the people”. His job, if you read the Constitution, is
    the Chief Law Enforcement oficer of the US charged with protecting the Borders of the Nation,
    and Settling disputes between the States. Ron Paul has no notion, just like Obomber, that
    he has to follow the Supreme Law of the Land which is the Constirution.

    • Willis

      Still laughing.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      What is a Constirution? Is it like brain constipation? You know that ailment that you suffer from.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        No you Paul bots have constipation you don’t listen can’t understand and are full of crap.

        • Willis

          Little John – Yaya-

          Ahh Skeet Skeet Skeet.

          You are so crunk.

  • Pete

    Ron Paul’s’ team has him saying exactly what you want to hear. After reading most of these pro-Paul statements, it proves to me that they are just listening to the media and what Paul wants you to her. Do yourself a favor and study Paul’s history. The American people want someone who will stabilize America and the world while protecting our interests and safety. Ron Paul is not that man. He is TOO liberal on a lot of his ideas but hew does talk a good story. I will vote for whoever becomes the Republican candidate in order to get Obama out of there prior to his finishing the job of tearing our country down to a third world status and this includes Ron Paul should he make it but I think my vote will have been in vain.

    • JRRS

      Great advice, the man has written nine books and in none of them is he the person being touted by these mindless supporters, especially the under 30′s group.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Agreed. Not only that but, by his own words he would be in conflict with the Constitution on the President protecting the US as he would shrink the military and allow open borders just like Obaama

      • Willis

        Lil jon – King of Crunk

  • bill

    Personally, I think Newt would be the best contender, but My vote will go to whoever the republican party nominates. Any would be a welcome replacement for Obummer

  • nofoolinpoulin

    I grant Ron Paul has some misgivings, however, I believe his stance on auditing the Federal Reserve and knowledge of how and why it was really estasblished by big bankers is reason alone for my vote.(see http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=federal+reserve+conspiracy&oq=federal&aq=1&aqi=g10&aql=&gs_sm=c&gs_upl=3293l13454l0l17287l7l7l0l0l0l0l308l1526l0.3.3.1l7l0)
    I believe abolishing the “Fed” and the “IRS” as we know it today would be a wonderful start in recovering this nation “of the People and for the People” We very much need to get back to the “Gold Standard”!!!! (one man’s opinion :-)

  • Marie

    You must ask yourself if you’re judging Ron Paul for himself by yourself or have you been influenced by the media, most of whom are tied with New World Order and Obama. He’s had quite a campaign of slander against him. One has to wonder if he’s the one the Democrats are most afraid of. I would suspect so. Fox News even drops the “bozo”, “nutty” names for Paul. I think it’s terrible and raises my suspicions of the commentator, not Paul. He states his opinion, but his explanation is never heard – because of the roar of the crowd. Listen carefully when he explains – makes sense to me.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Nope judging him by his own words through logic and reason something if you look at it sorely lacking with libertarians read their books and make up your own mind you might be surprised at what you find out.

  • Patriotic nut

    Look at where this article originates and you’ll understand. I personally do not have that much of a problem with Ron Paul. Some of the stories about him are very exaggerated, just as things are against all the candidates. I have listened to Mr. Paul myself and found some of his ideas great and others not so much, just as with the other candidates. The main problem I have with Mr. Paul is that if he is elected he will get little to no support from congress and will accomplish little if anything as president. It actually isn’t a problem with Mr. Paul but that he is alone in his battle with the establishment, almost.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Well then, stand by him if he is elected. He won’t stand alone if we stand with him. If we have a self-serving legislature in Washington, then contact them if and when they go against Ron Paul’s direction. Tell them that you will fire the bastards if they fight Ron Paul in any way. Real simple.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        You sound just like Obama

        • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

          And you are starting to sound like Millicent.

  • randellmd

    Nope Ron Paul is a short white whiny obama on steriods he will not even come close to winning.

    • Al

      Wow… Nice use of name calling… You really got your point across…

      What a bunch of nonsense!

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      He will come closer to winning then you can imagine, you hob goblin.

  • Patrick McDonald

    If this article is based on the polling numbers and the recent 2nd place win in N.H. then you’re wrong. The exit polls indicated that the majority of his voters were Democrat and Independent’s. When asked if R. Paul becomes the Republican candidate running against Obama “who would you vote for” the majority answered Obama. N.H. is a spoiler state alowing all parties to vote not just Republicans. If only Republicans were allowed to vote then I think this wouldn’t be a topic of conversation.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Nicely stated unfortunately not reported

      • Willis

        Well in that case Lil Jon. Your mate Obama wins.

  • Jim Agans

    Ron Paul has been right on every issue discussed in all of the debates he has been in. What more do you need? It is time for those of you who are not on board to get on, or you are going to have four more years of the same incompetence in the White House. I am voting for Ron Paul, even if I have to write him in. I fought for my right to vote, and I am going to exercise it.

    • Jack

      good post jim,but there are a lot of morons posting on here about ron paul. lot of ignorance on display

  • http://wolfpack2012.net JThaddeustoad

    We are in the season where primary campaigning will serve as an infomation source to vette all the candidates ….. Let us keep in mind that no matter ones past transgressions the ability to change is gifted to us all by seeing the error of our ways …. This applies to all the candidates… I like what Ron Paul has to say but unfortunately he is proving to be an anachronism in the light of this entitlement generation of 48 out of every 100 americans are getting a check from the government…( the time for Ron Paul was 1964)…. Gingrich is a knowledgable politico with inside experience and dealings with the DC bunch Iam not sure we need an academic to teach us the ways of the world,he is a very agressive competitive candidate with really good Ideas …. Santorum wants to be president because he is nice guy and professes his rightousness,unfortunately this nation has surrended it rightousness to greed and averace…. Romney is the surviving alternative,however,we all must be atuned to some very evident varifiable facts …. Last year Bain Capital contributed to the elections of 29 candidates and 26 of them were democratic…. I know this sounds ominous,but let us examine the circumstances …..These are capitalists(Bain)not politicians and they will go with the flow ….. Any wise business man can feel the winds of change are blowing and Bain is no exception….. MY bet is the capital will flow to the republican party with a Romney nomination …. How is this for a dream team …. Romney Pres. Gingrich or Trump VP Ron Paul chairmen of the fed… we mu7st not forget that in order to effect real change we need the senate,the house and the executive branches of government…. capital will flow to local campaigns across the country…

  • LVBob

    Are all of you Newt supporters so dumb you cannot see the problem with the $1.6M he took from Fannie and Freddie for “history lessons”. Probably a lot of history teachers out there that would have done it for a lot less. The man is a snob and a liar, two really bad traits along with his ethics problems while Speaker, his dumping of his ill wife and marrying his trophy wife. He makes John Edwards and Bill Clinton look like husbands of the year.

  • Jack

    all I see on this post are brainwashed monkeys who buy into romney who is no more than a white obummer. ron paul makes sense and loves our country which is by the way a republic,not a democracy. he wants to give power back to the people and restore the constitution of the united states. you liberal anti paul morons are the reason this country is turning into a socialist military regime.

    • Stan

      Well said Jack!

  • http://conservativebyte.com/2011/08/five-reasons-obamas-speech-stunt-hurts-him/ Stop obama!

    NOT!

  • Jedi

    I was a Republican for 50 years and hated the choices we had for President every time except Ronald Reagan. I am now an Independent and I will only vote for a true conservative who stands on the Constitution. Ron Paul is the only candidate that says what he means and means what he says. Most of the negative comments posted here are by the ignorant, biased, agenda based, liberal thinking, hypocrites who do not have a clue what the founders and framers of the USA Constitution knew.
    You don’t know what you don’t know. The founders knew that the liberal agenda would fight hard to destroy conservative ideals. Anyone educated in the Government Schools have been brain washed to support liberalism and big government. Government has no business controlling every aspect of the citizens life.
    Only a person like Ron Paul who does understand more than any other person running for office what the role of government is suppose to be is worthy to hold the office of President of what used to be the greatest nation in the world. God will take his hand off this country one day and it may be sooner than later if the people of this country don’t get better informed.
    WAKE UP HYPOCRITES!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      You might want to know that Paul disrespected both Ronald Reagan and Abe Lincoln the man is clearly a nut case period.

  • Rick

    Why would you vote for someone who has said himself that he cant win?

  • http://None G.H.D.

    We have had a foriegner as our president for over three years! Do you really think that by electing the candidates that want to bragg about “What” they can do, just as “The foriegner did”
    that behaves as any “Dictator” would, that these other candidates can undo all the wrongs of this hateful presidency in a couple of years is insane! You must consider that all the “States”
    Have had their rights trampled by the “Federal burocrats” and it will take someone who strongly believes in the rights of the states to return them! That is Ron Pauls objective, that is the way he believes and being an honest politition, that is what he will do! The others can only
    make unfulfiled promises, and that is the reason that Ron Paul will get my vote!

  • Adam’s Rib

    God help us if Ron Paul is chosen to run against Obama.
    In a debate, Obama would chew him up and spit him out!
    Obama would love to have Paul as his opponent.
    At Paul’s age, he might not even make it to November.
    Paul looks frail and ill to me. His isolationism would
    bring our country to oblivion. With all the nukes rattling
    around, it’s not time to be an isolationist. His views on
    allowing Iran to have nukes is enough to tell you right
    there that he is incompetent to lead this country and
    keep it safe. He even had the gall to say that America
    was to blame for the 9-11 attacks. What kind of talk
    is that? I think he’s looney. He could never defeat
    Obama. If he is the one to oppose Obama, then we’ll
    have 4 more years of Obama. Then, our country will
    be destroyed by this Muslim, Communist imposter.
    If Ron Paul is the choice to run against Obama, then
    I am leaving before Obama starts his second term
    and the walls come tumbling down. Better update
    your passports.
    The only glimmer of hope of getting us out of this
    disaster we’re in, is Newt. He’s the only one that
    can put Obama down. He’s the most experienced
    and the most intelligent.
    A vote for Paul is a vote for Obama.
    Forget Gran-Paul.

    • Al

      Newt?

      How is replacing a corrupt bankster backed politician with a corrupt globalist politician any help to the American people?

      Ron Paul 2012!!! :)

    • Stan

      Adam,you sound like Fox news and CNN rolled into one…….and as far as NWO Newt goes,that would be as bad,or worse than obama,because he is smarter at being deceptive.Our Republic needs a true patriot,that believes in this country as the founding fathers did.Ron Paul is the only conservative that can get this country out of it’s down spiraling fall toward socialism.

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Paul is neither a Conservative or a Republican this comes out of his own mouth along with many other things to silly to note.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      ADAM, I AM WITH YOU ABOUT NEWT, I AGREE !! IN FACT I AGREE WITH YOUR COMMENTS !!

  • JRRS

    The absolute best candidate wil be whoever is running against Obama. The goal is to get that radical Muslim out of the White House. All these personal attacks are not doing that cause any good. We need the strong support of independents to defeat Obama.

  • Dixie Doodle

    I’ve thought about this post for a long time and once I’ve writtwen it, I probably won’t send any more. I’m very old and this is finally getting on my last nerve.

    As I’ve said before, we must PRAY!!! I am a democrat who will be voting republican in this upcoming election. Let me say this, whomever is chosen to run, we must stand behind him 100%. Many say if this one or that one does not get the nod, they will not vote. Put your thinking caps on — it doesn’t take a Philadelphia lawyer to know that an abstention from you is a vote for obummer. There are many things about those seeking the nomination that I don’t agree with, but I don’t care who it is, he will have my vote!!! If everyone would think this way, we would have no problem in November.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      God bless you and keep you. The Democratic party is no longer a true American Party . To many willingly help Obama and what he has done along with some RINO’s on this side.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      DIXIE, VERY GOOD …I AGREE…MY SENTIMENTS ALSO..I WILL VOTE FOR WHO EVER IS NOMINATED…WE MUST SAVE THIS COUNTRY !

  • Al

    Ron Paul would make a great President…

    It’s just too bad that many of the Anti Paul people on here are quick to resort to the same old tired name calling with little to no substance on their stance on why they despise Dr. Paul and support their establishment candidate of choice.

    Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Pepper

      They, and the candidates they claim to support, appear to be nothing but Globalist Establishment Puppets (R), functionally equivalent to Globalist Establishment Puppets (D), whose end goal is the ruination of America and its absorption into a new totalitarian world state.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Hardly my attacks are based on what Paul has said if you do not like it please vote for some one else. I do not have to resort to lies or libel his own words do him in along with his actions or inaction in the last 30 years.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      AL, WE, WHO ARE AGAINST PAUL ARE GOING BY WHAT HAS COME OUT OF HIS STUPID MOUTH…HE HAS SAID IT ON T V…SO WE HAVE SUBSTANCE…PUT THAT IN YOUR PIPE & SMOKE IT… YOU MUST BE A LIBERAL BECAUSE IF YOU WERE A CONSERVATIVE YOU WOULD NOT GO ALONG WITH PAUL’S BELIEFS & TRY TO SAVE THIS COUNTRY …IT IS TOO BAD THAT WE HAVE A BUNCH OF LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ON THIS PAGE IN DISGUISE !! SO THERE IS YOUR SUBSTANCE !!

  • hot02rod

    WONDERFUL COMMENTS,,AND YOU ALL MY BE RIGHT.GOD ONLY KNOWS WHO IS TO BE PRESIDENT.I FOR ONE BELIEVE NEWT IS THE ONE.TIME WILL TELL.NO MATTER WHO’S PUT IN WE MUST PRAY FOR THAT PERSON.REMEMBER THIS IS NOT A REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT RACE OR ANY OTHER PARTY.THIS RACE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT RACE AMERICA HAS EVER HAD OR WILL EVER HAVE.AMERICA IS IN A SPIRITUAL WAR,NOT A RELIGIOUS WAR BUT A SPIRITUAL ONE.SATAN WANTS WORLD CONTROL.CONTROL OF EVERY THING THAT OUR CONSTITUTION STANDS FOR.OBAMA’S CHANGE.WELL THAT’S WHAT HE IS DOING.IT’S IMPORTANT WHO WE VOTE FOR.WE CAN’T AFFORD AN OBUMER CLONE. GOD HELP US IN OUR TIME OF NEED.

    • MLC

      Amen.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      HOTO2ROD, GO NEWT..I AGREE !!

  • kellys

    Ron Paul is the closest thing to a Jefferson or a Madison we will ever get. These men wrote the foundational basics for this great country and Ron Paul is the only one who not only talks like them but can walk the walk as well. The rest are compromised with their agendas and lack of understanding of what America is truly supposed to be. Other than Ron Paul all of them are for bigger, more costly, more intrusive government. Paul is the only one truly electable, the problem lies in a well manipulated and ignorant public caught up in the well established deceptions that our government has to have its nose into everything and that bigger government is better. If Paul is not elected all we can look forward to is more governmental debt to bind Americans to their banking masters, more surveillance to bind us to our governmental masters. Freedom as I knew it when I was younger is already a thing of the past, how much farther will we let it go. May God help us.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Jefferson perhaps James Madison never. Madison would never hold to so much foolishness that Paul embraces read his books look at his history

  • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason

    Ron Paul 2012!

    Legalize the constitution!

  • gullah

    Of course the Huffington Post would want Paul to be our nominee because they know they can tear him up during the general election regarding his newsletters.

    Folks Paul gets an “F” on illegal immigration.
    Santorum just rocketed to an A- on illegal immigration. He has seen the light!

    Go to NUMBERSUSA to see the grades.

    • Robert A L

      Sorry I don’t to see the “Grades” by some group who has an undisclosed agenda trying to manipulate the populace. I can think for myself thus I vote for Ron Paul! As all Americans who can truly think for themselves and care for their country do!

  • Arthur Konyak

    I don’t agree with everything that Ron Paul has to say, but he’s 1000% better than what we have in office now. At least he’s an American and proud of it. As a matter of fact, they could nominate and run a corpse for the Republican ticket, elect him, and he would be a better president than Osamabama.

    • donald

      No Doubt!

  • VEDerma

    Ron Paul will never win. Many of his ideas re forpol are baloney and he is too old. He will never get the youth vote. Obama will have landslide against him. That’s why democrats seem to be the ones promoting him.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      VEDERMA, THAT IS WHY ALL THESE DEMOCRATS ON THIS PAGE ARE PROMOTING PAUL…THEY ARE NOT FOOLING ANYONE …. WE ARE WISE TO THEM…THEY WANT PAUL TO WIN THE NOMINATION SO OBAMA WILL GET HIS 4 MORE YEARS…WASTING YOUR TIME LIBERAL DEMS BECAUSE PAUL WILL NEVER WIN…HE IS A NUT CASE !

  • david

    WOW! The Huffington Post as a source document..now THAT scares me! Sounds like an infiltration to me. Dr. Paul as a viable candidate? He is NO LESS or MORE electable than a pompous former Speaker- THROWN out for his lack of ethics, or a it’s okay to bribe mexicans with reduced college ala Texas governor, Or a LIBERAL governor who thiks an INDIVIDUAL mandate is the way to go for the country..read that LOSS of LIBERTY..
    Dr. Paul would honor the limits of the office of the presidency NOT attempt to be dictator in chief as we have now.
    I WISHED to God there were ONE honest CONSERVATIVE with honor and dignity to restore the country to the REPUBLIC we are supposed to be…
    My fear is there is none and we are doomed to endure weakness and servitude for generations.

  • Mad Mike

    If Ron Paul is the candidate selected to run against Obama, He will have my vote. Of course, if “Bugs Bunny” won, he would have my vote also! Anything, anybody, (or even, no body), would get my vote against our current “Anti-Christ” in the white house. You know where Herman Cain got his plan for “9-9-9″? He saw an “up-side down” picture of Obama sitting in the barber’s chair.

  • Daylo

    Let’s face it folks. During the American Revolution, Ron Paul would have been a Tory. He would have never taken up arms against the King of England.

    • Stan

      Thats a lie,He would have been known today as one of the founding fathers.

    • Al

      At Daylo;

      This is a lie… Dr. Paul served his country… Unlike Newt and the gang…

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

      • Are You Serious

        Yeah, he was in the Air Force before they had planes. LOL

      • Jonathan Gartner

        Ah yes Pauls service to his country warm bed warm food no real danger as a flight surgeon LOL

    • Pepper

      You bunch clamoring to support the latest Establishment Puppet are the ones deserving of the Tory designation.

      • Daylo

        Wow, I just got called a liar and was attacked by Ron Paul’s most vehement group of supporters here and other places as well! Nasty individuals who stand by their man.

        The statement below is from freerepublic.com:

        In 2005, Ron Paul was the only Republican lawmaker who refused to vote for a resolution condemning Iran’s President after he said “Israel should be wiped off the map,” and called for a “world without Zionism. . . Like it or not, the Zionist regime is heading toward annihilation. The Zionist regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one storm.” He also warned Europe that it should support his country’s nuclear program or “suffer the consequences.”

        ***********************
        Yet, you are still advocating that Paul is the way to go. Are you Israel haters as well? If not, how do you explain this? It is NOT just America, but our allies and Europe as well that Iran hates. Please explain!

        • Daylo

          No takers, I see… It’s hard to refute the lack of Paul’s own words, isn’t it?…don’t tell me he loves our ally, Israel!

          • Al

            Sorry for the late response.

            Dr. Paul has no beef with Israel. In fact, Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel Agrees with US Congressman Ron Paul on his foreign policy concerning Israel.

            Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Well said

  • Darryl

    Huntsman just quit and endorsed Romney.

    • Pepper

      Five more votes for Mittens. Oh well, guess we should all pack up and go home now.

  • a b

    DRAFT J.C. WATTS – former Oklahoma congressman. Not a career politician and probably more in line with mainstream America than any of the present candidates.

  • Richard

    Well I still don’t know if Ron Paul is electable. But, what I do know is that he’s an honest man, wants to downsize govt., get rid of bloated, oversized fed. govt. agencies, no foreign aid (since we’re broke), and the most important of all, he believes in following the Constitution! That right there puts me in Paul’s camp. I listen to the debates and as far as I’m concerned, he speaks from the heart (not a teleprompter), and when I do hear him speak, I like what I hear.

    I’m voting for Ron Paul for 2012!

  • http://deprogrammingservices.com deprogramming services

    I’ve seen what appear to be liberal trolls on these sites telling us not to vote for the only conservative running, Ron Paul. One of the reasons they are giving is his age. If I remember right that tactic was also used against Reagan. It failed then and it will fail now too.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      Not a Republican or Conservative his words not mine Libertarian read the books then ditch Paul

  • Daylo

    Ron Paul — Once upon a time, there was a man who wanted peace with everyone and everything. He wanted liberty. Strict Liberty. The people gathered around him and said his name over and over and over again. “Paul…Paul…Paul…Paul…” The country rallied around him and voted him in as President of the United States of America. They laid down their weapons and began to live in peace and happiness. Then one day, Iran shipped a nuclear bomb under great cover and quietness to the land of Chavez. They bomb was launched.

    Good night. Sleep tight. Hope the bombs don’t light.

    • http://deprogrammingservices.com deprogramming services

      Tyrants and aspiring tyrants have always used the threat of powerful enemies as a pretext to acquire and maintain their power. This has been so common in fact that it was a central theme in the book 1984.

      Ron Paul is not anti-defense. What he is anti is our military being turned into a foreign legion that can protect the borders of any country in the world except our own. As a veteran of the Viet Nam war he is also a believer in either fighting a war or not fighting a war; he is anti fighting a war in a half-assed manner that just gets a lot of our young men killed and maimed and puts us in debt but doesn’t solve the problem.

      Have you wondered why Ron Paul gets more money from military people than any other candidate? Do you really think that’s because he’s anti-defense? Think about these things my friend; you have been manipulated by those who seek to be your masters.

      • Richard

        You’re absolutely right Deprogramming Services! Remember, the Gulf of Tonkin incident? The lie perpetrated by our own govt. to get us involved in the Viet Nam fiasco. How about Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty back in 1967. They attacked the USS Liberty so they could blame it on Egypt! We send foreign aid to Isreal so they can attack one of our own? C’mon people, how many time do you have to be played before you tire of it!

      • Joyce

        Deprograming, Your quote “What he is anti is our military being turned into a foreign legion that can protect the borders of any country in the world except our own” is EXACTLY why people are afraid of Ron Paul. When some strong agressor comes forward (maybe in the future China or another) and they take over ALL of the strong countries in the world and use their resources against us, how long do you think we would be able to stand against the world. During WW II, when we were issolationist and weak militarily, that came close to happening.

        • http://deprogrammingservices.com deprogramming services

          I know. Some problems don’t have a good solution. But our solution, which is being policeman to the world, has proven to be a very bad one, and I think Ron Paul’s would be less bad. Our foreign aid and foreign legion will destroy us through debt, so that we won’t be able to defend against a serious aggressor like China. (Socialism will also destroy us by the way, and Ron Paul is the only candidate who has proven that he will do anything meaningful about that.)

          I think all of the Islamic nations being united under a caliphate is a possible threat too, especially with the vast fifth columns the caliphate already has in western nations like ours (thanks to political correctness).

          There are three ways we can deal with a potential threat:
          1. Let the threat know that if they leave us alone we will leave them alone. And mind our own business.
          2. Some version of what we are doing now: get involved in world politics and try to shape the world in such a way that it is not a threat to us.
          3. Destroy any and all enemies completely, and let it be known that we can and will do that. Be friends with anyone who wants to be our friend, but if someone chooses to be our enemy, be the most terrible enemy they could ever imagine.

          Ron Paul, if elected, will try the first option, for either four or eight years. If a real threat comes along in that period I am confident that he will deal with it, effectively and decisively, not in the half-assed manner other leaders have done. If the world appears to be taking the kind off shape your post suggests either Ron Paul or the next leader can adjust our foreign policy to deal with it.

          We will then be able to say that we gave the first option every possible chance and it just didn’t work. The same can be said for the second option. So maybe then we as a nation will finally pull our collective head out of our rear end and take a closer look at the third option.

          As I said, some problems don’t have a good solution. But some of the bad ones are still preferable to others. The least preferable to me is the never-ending wars our leaders have led us into.

          This is a very complex issue, and it’s hard to address your comment adequately in a post even as long as this one, but I hope this clarifies my point, and shows you that Ron Paul’s position on foreign policy is not as simplistic as it is often portrayed as being.

          • Pepper

            Thank you for daring to use logic and reason in this veritable cesspool of filth and venom.

            As an armchair foreign policy analyst, I interpret the Ron Paul strategy ideas as a combination of what you have listed as options 1 and 3, with Option 3 as the last resort.

          • Joyce

            Deprogramming, I appreciate your reasoned reply and also agree with some of your points. I would support Ron Paul being appointed to some important post in which he is interested. He has some excellents ideas. However, I do not believe he would make a good president for many reasons, foremost of which is his issolationist stance and lack of reality on foreign affairs. If we let our friends be taken over by an aggressor nation, eventually there will be no friends left. I wish all nations would live within their borders and leave their neighbors alone. That is not true now and has NEVER been true in the whole history of the world. Some of our own people think we are the problem, and everything would be good if we just stayed home — not true. How many of those countries we saved after WW II are we ruling or even since then? Many have climbed on the Obama band wagon that we should appologize to the world. Obama has done that, so how is that working out for Obama?

    • Robert A L

      Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

      Benjamin Franklin

      You would have the US destroy all Civil Liberties to avoid such an imagined event ? And why would Iran seek to do such a thing? Oh because we are oppressing them from every angle. And how would it occur by slipping thru our open borders that Bush Obama and Romney Gingrich etc will not close. Ron Paul will stop the dilution of the USA by invasion from other cultures intent on Destroying the USA aswe know and love it.

      • Pepper

        Indeed, if the terrorists truly hate us because we are free and prosperous, well we are pretty close to eliminating that (freedom and prosperity, not the terrorists), aren’t we.

        • Jonathan Gartner

          Nope they want us to bow down to their arabian moon god please do try to keep up

    • Jonathan Gartner

      And because he did not defend the United States he is violation of the Constitution

  • josetoyou

    Dr. Paul is not my choice, but I will vote for ANYBODY besides the black clown now posing as president…

  • jorge

    Everyone who voted for “Obama” should vote for Ron Paul, because Paul will truly make “change” and not the “business as usual” under another name that “Obama” has given us. The media has been lying about Paul. Now that I listen to him speak in his own words, I think he is exactly what we need! Get rid of the income tax-so we can keep ALL of our income and return to Constitutional Government-so that our freedoms are restored!!! Before our government gives up our sovereign to the UN, we truly need a “CHANGE”!!

  • Wife of Purple Heart Vet

    We need the transparency, as promised by the current president, so we really know how our president thinks on all issues. Ron Paul will give us honesty and the real hope we deserve. He would not turn away opportunities that would create jobs for our people. Good luck and GOD BLESS you Ron!

    • ticktockoma

      You’re right! I haven’t heard any candidate say anything specific about these things.

      Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who doesn’t just talk about balancing the budget, but who has a full plan to get it done.

      SPENDING:

      Cut $1 trillion in spending during the first year of Ron Paul’s presidency, eliminating five cabinet departments (Energy, HUD, Commerce, Interior, and Education), abolishing the Transportation Security Administration and returning responsibility for security to private property owners, abolishing corporate subsidies, stopping foreign aid, ending foreign wars, and returning most other spending to 2006 levels.

      REGULATION:

      Repeal ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, and Sarbanes-Oxley. Mandate REINS-style requirements for thorough congressional review and authorization before implementing any new regulations issued by bureaucrats. President Paul will also cancel all onerous regulations previously issued by Executive Order.

      MONETARY POLICY:

      Conduct a full audit of the Federal Reserve and implement competing currency legislation to strengthen the dollar and stabilize inflation.

  • Chad

    ConservativeByte …Taking a bite out of Liberalism. My Butt!!…This is a cesspool of Liberals.

    • Jonathan Gartner

      or Libertarians hard to know which is worse same methods

  • OAHS

    Ron Paul is the only honest candidate … he never changes his beliefs … integrity …

    • Catfish

      He is a three time loser, do you get it?

      • Pepper

        How many times did Reagan lose? Oh right. Fail, catfish, back into the mud with you!

    • Very Concerened For Our Country

      AMEN

  • off plum

    Chad … Your the liberal … Go back to obama supporting
    The rest of us want freedom.

  • Grace

    what do you think of an all Texas Ticket???? Ron Paul and Rick Perry. We would surely have our Mexican Border closed then, don’t you think.

  • Jedi

    Moses told God he wasn’t eloguant enough to lead the Jews but God told Moses he would provide what ever he needed including someone esle to do his speaking for him if that is what it took for him to do the job. Moses took the job of leading the Israelites out of bondage and did a stellar job doing it. Moses was the man for the job because he had faith and believed God.
    Ron Paul may not believe he will be president because he knows how the system works and dishonest men twist the truth and lie and cheat in order to make certain men like Ron will not get elected.
    Besides the government educated people have a religion of their own called Humanism. They love and worship the creature more than the creator. So anybody that runs for office that is going to jeapordize the humanist postion by taking power away from their protector .. The Government.. will be maligned by the majority of voters.
    Many of you who are making these comments concerning Dr. Paul are guilty and it is time to repent or just admit that you are really a liberal calling yourself a conservative. Being a Republican does not make one a Conservative. Most Republicans I know are more liberal than they are conservative for the very reasons I have already stated……Government Education….. you don’t know what you don’t know!

  • Very Concerened For Our Country

    Ron Paul is the answer to the mess our country is in. If he loses we all will lose our freedom, rights and you think the country is in trouble now, you have not seen anything!! A vote for any other person will be a vote to have the same problems we have, only worse. Americans stand up and fight the powers that be and take control of your country and life. Vote for FREEDOM, CHANGE, RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION, GIVE US OUR RIGHTS BACK. Our country has been being taken over for years and years slowly by the elite who want a one world order to take over the world, they are in both parties that are part of them, and do what they are told. O has been the worst of all of them. Please wake up and take responsibility for your life and your world. Vote for Dr. Ron Paul!! Show the Elite that control our media, our government, we the people no longer want them in Washington. We NEED the Change we wanted 4 years ago, but did not get, it was worse than ever. Dr. Ron Paul is the only one who has been fighting for us his whole career in Washington. Do not listen to the lies you are fed on main street media, you will never know the truth. The Elite own them and tell them what they can say. Why do you think they have banned against Ron Paul and do not report on him Think About It. They are afraid of him and the truth he tells about. WAKE UP AMERICA before it is too late. God Help Us!!

  • Gordon

    The Russians and Iran have been reported to back Ron Paul??!! with campaign funds!!
    go to http://www.redstate.com and search on the words. It amazes me that so few people have picked up on this! A vote for Ron Paul is a vote to give our enemies free passes at us and we have no future, if an enemy EMP or nuke knocks out 90% of civilization as we know it. No wonder they are backing him! Think about it people before you throw our country away. I would vote for Rick Santorum even tho he is not the perfect candidate, no one running is, but anyone is better than Obummer the communist muzlim traitor.

  • DW

    We MUST nominate a candidate that can beat Obama, no exceptions. You “Paul-Bots” are screwing up the election. RP cannot win the National Election so please just drop out of the race now. His “isolationist” views on National Security are very dangerous for this Nation!!!

    • Al

      At DW;

      We must nominate Ron Paul, no exceptions!!! These establishment cheerleaders need to get their heads out of the sand. Newt, Romney and the rest of the gang should all drop out. None of them can win! They’re messing up this election! They’re all Pro War Big Government Puppets and are a danger to our rights and our freedoms and our nation!

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • off plum

    Daylo….
    Has Ron Paul ever talked about giving up our second amendment right to bear arms … No !
    If you are so fooled by the same mainstream media that has protected and supported obama then maybe you should be one of his supporters?

    • Daylo

      I might listen to him a little closer if he wasn’t so incoherent. I can’t make sense of the man, especially when it comes to foreign policy. He’s too vague. I believe that is on purpose. He is an apologist when it comes to America. We already have one of them in the WH. Thanks, anyway.

  • Richard

    Wow, I just read the comments on this article! The Obamabots are alive and well. This just goes to prove how afraid they are of Ron Paul. If there was a debate between Paul and Obama, Paul would crush him, while Obama would be reading his teleprompter. We have a president that thinks America has 57 states. What his excuse for not knowing how many states there are? He certainly can’t feign faulty memory because of his age.

    C’mon, people, it’s time to wake up and realize we have a Marxist for president in the WH, whose only goal is to ruin America. First, by ruining the economy (which he’s doing one hell of a job at), then bypassing and running around those cowards in Congress. Obama has no respect for our Constitution and Rule of Law. I mean look at what AG Eric Holder’s been up to. Look at all the corruption that is the Obama Administration. If I need to explain it, then you’re either a total Obamabot, or you refuse to look at the facts. NDAA, google it. This is what your beloved president thinks of you America!

    Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse are supposed to have a report out on Obama in Feb. Can’t wait. And, let’s give a round of applause to Judge Malihi out of Georgia, whose finally given ‘standing’ so Obama will have to appear in court Jan. 26 to prove he’s eligible to be on the 2012 election ballot. Sure seems funny to me that all other presidents before Obama we’re vetted, but not Obama. If he’s got nothing to hide, then why’s he hiding?

    Obama’s house of cards is starting to crumble and the emperor has no clothes!

  • czman

    All of you naysayers, go ahead and vote for romney, newt, and expect a
    different result than obonzo, you are insane. The only way to effect a
    different outcome is to vote for someone completely different than the norm!
    Stop drinking the rino koolaid…

    • Al

      Great Points!!!

      Rino Kool-Aid! Nice :)

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

      • Daylo

        Ron Paul believes the “Golden Rule” should be applied to our enemies. The enemies are laughing with all their being. The rest of us are laughing with all of our being as well. Our enemies don’t seem to agree with Paul, but you guys do. I would think that both parties would have to agree to that “golden Rule” thing for it to work. You forget that our enemies don’t even know what the “Golden Rule” is. That’s an American thing.

        At least Newt can put two sentences together and you can understand him. Ron Paul needs to be a treasurer, but without public contact.

  • http://www.wix.com/albarrs/usandfamilyhistory Al Barrs

    This article is clearly a diehard propaganda piece. It only mentions his positive traits, but conveniently never mentions his outrageous and in some cases dangerous shortcomings! So, you think the conservative American people will set complacently by and let Iran get an atomic bomb or bombs, let Islamist terrorists escalate death and destruction in Europe and America and allow the open use of drugs and their related death to others on our highways, and on and on… Sure, Paul’s poll numbers are rising but look who is supporting him, the drugheads, the anti-American faction, the anti-war faction, etc. definitely not the mainstream working folks. No, the conservatives of America will not allow Libertarian Ron Paul into the Whitehouse! We have had enough irresponsible activities and policies by allowing a Socialist (Communist) into the Whitehouse. Many would prefer Obama to Paul… THINK ABOUT IT…

    • Patriot 101

      I’m a Christian Conservative from Iowa and your premise of Ron Paul’s support is seriously WRONG! There are not a bunch of Obama liberals trying to savage or infiltrate the primary process to compromise the Republican nomination.
      Ron Paul’s support here was (is) enthusiastic and across all ages, faiths and economic backgrounds!
      To say we are a bunch of liberal pot heads in favor of Iran having a nuke, or legalizing drugs and prostitution is just plain offensive and TOTALLY WRONG!
      Pot heads wouldn’t support Ron Paul financially, as they would rather buy a bag of pot than send in a donation. Your theory just falls apart if you look at the amount of financial support and the huge number of votes that Ron Paul gets. His support is from REPUBLICANS. Constitutional conservative REPUBLICANS! Santorum is taking the Social conservative Republican vote, or Ron Paul’s numbers would be whatever Ron Paul has PLUS about 80% of Santorum supporters. It should be 100% but there are probably 20% or so that are so closed minded they will not look at Ron Paul.

  • Brenda in VA

    Well ! Here in VA our 2 choices ARE JUST Romney & Paul!
    So much for a REAL election & Freedom of Choice!
    THESE ARE THE ONLY 2 folks the Republican party can DIG UP for me to decide WHOM should RUN My country?

  • http://bowlingsurfboards.com pete bowling III

    the paulbots just want pot !!! the only reason he has so much support is legalizeing drugs!!! get a clue there are more important things than getting stoned!!!!!

    • Al

      At pete bowling III;

      Yes there are more important things. For instance, more gun control for lawful citizens, extend and expand the powers of the Patriot Act, and more never ending wars…. Oh wait, sorry that what the establishment candidates are pushing for… Sounds like a great plan Pete…

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • LT

    One of a million reason he is not electable, I’m note voting for him!

  • Are You Serious

    .…….…..:´¯/)
    …………./¯..//
    …………/….//
    ……/´¯/’…’/´¯¯’)¸
    …/’/…/…./……./¨¯\
    .(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
    ..\……………..’……/
    …’\……………. _.•´ 
    …..\………….. (
    ……\………….. \

    For all you idiots supporting the old fool Ron Paul.

    • Patriot 101

      Very cute, you could spend a little of that time wasted reading up on the strongest conservative in the race… RON PAUL!

      • Are You Serious

        If you’re down wind perhaps.

    • donald

      I don’t care for Ron Paul. But crude doesn’t cut it “are you serious”. Makes you look like a liberal democrat!

      • Are You Serious

        Cut this. Are you gay?

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Right back at ya, you witless troll.

    • ANTICRIME

      LOL! ~ The Liberal “Sign” of ultimate frustration from those unable to bebate against TRUTH!!! ~ ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • LouiseCA

    Ron Paul is frighteningly naive on foreign policy, the middle east and Israel. He is not presidential material. I appreciate that he is pro-life and that he evidently is a believer in Christ, but that simply does not qualify him for the presidency. Didn’t we learn our lesson last time? We put an old man up next to Obama and look what we got-disaster. And McCain was more qualified than Paul. And even if he did beat Obama-which is highly unlikely-our enemies will laugh and roll right over us. He thinks we should feel sorry for Iran because they are “victims of terror” because they lost one of their scientists who was helping them develop a nuclear weapon. Really? People-use your brains. There is more at stake her besides shrinking the size of government. All of the candidates know we have to do that. But at least the rest of them know that everyone in the world is not a nice guy.

    • RiverFred

      Right on, when I heard he was not against Iran having nuclear weapons I thought it was a mistake, I contacted his headquarters and they confirmed. What an idiot.
      If Iran goes nuclear, Israel is # 1 target and the USA is # 2 target.

      • ANTICRIME

        FRED, you have been spending too much time fishing in the river instead of getting yourself informed, my friend!
        THINK; Israel has around 300 nukes and the U.S. many more so WHY would a country like Iran want to commit suicide with one or a few at most nukes?!!!
        Israel’s Prime Minister and also their head of Mosad publicly stated that Iran is NO real threat to Israel and if they should become so, Israel could handle them WITHOUT US INTERVENTION….DUHHHHHH!!!

        The BIGGEST THREAT to America is the UNINFORMED VOTER!!!
        Hosea 4:6 “My people perish for their lack of knowledge”!

    • ANTICRIME

      LouiseCA, And you are “frighteningly naive” of facts concerning Ron Paul ~ Go study!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • tod

    Thank God !!!The World is Waking Up!!! Now if you people would quit your Sunday worship of Baal,and start Worshipping (I AM The Lord God Almighty) on His Day Of Rest,the Sabbath,and stop your Pagan Celebrations of Christmas,Easter,Halloween,and others,just Maybe God will forgive us and protect Dr.Ron Paul,and let him lead us back to our Constitution based on Gods word !!! For What God Really Tells Us Go To ( lcg.org )The Living Church of God ! Dr.Ron Paul 2012 !!!

    • http://wolfpack2012.net JThaddeustoad

      Amen : To that Tod …… unfortunately I think God has kept his promise to this great nation and because of the herdness of our hearts he has left us to our own devices and the spirit of confusion has taken hold ….. I think we both know who is the author of confusion ….. Let us look at what we have become in this blessed nation ….. Pornography is an industry,Killing babies is a choice,Deviete behavior is an alternate lifestyle,we have a drug habit that supports entire economies of countries who hate us,nuturing mothers are sentenced to poverty because divorce is an option and a way to abandon responsibility ,we have removed God from our politics,schools and community facilities…. just to name a few ….. God Bless America ! Why???? Good people have been silent to long…. perhaps if we sincerely ask of him and we change our ways things could change…. Ron Paul was answer in 1964

  • bob

    ANYONE that thinks Ron Paul is insane must think that the writers of the constitution were insane, he did not think up any of his supposed ideas. They are all from the constitution….
    Constitution based government and spending and military etc.

    • shawn corrigan

      you are absolutely correct. people are bashing ron paul with name calling, they NEVER use substance, WHY because they have none. thankyou for that !!!

      he honors his oath of office . he is a fighter, much more than most as he was a soldier.
      he fights to uphold the constitution. he is called many disparaging names for his correct stances. the reason is easy ,but most people will not take the time to see why the establishment is afraid of him, why they smear him with shallow name calling.
      read the bilderberg agenda. then you will see why this is taking place. dont be a fool.

  • Kit

    Remember the summer of 2007 when John McCain was lugging his own suitcases at the airports because his campaign was broke? Then a miracle happened and his campaign was flush with moeny and he went on to win the GOP nomination. You can’t tell me that the RINO’s and the SOROS group did not have a big part in that. Well I think we’re seeing it all over again with Ron Paul. The left wants him to win because he would be chopped liver for the BO gang. Wake up and realize that we need a strong person who has battled the left and has won,. Newt is that person and his baggage doesn’t bother me a bit. He has proven that he can get the job done.

  • http://none MCS

    Ron Paul is a doctor by previous trade. All doctors are pacifists. Read the hypocratic oath. All pacifists have gotten us in BIG trouble through out history in this screwed up world. You have to look no further than Neville Chamberland to see where that leads. Adoph Hitler!!!!!!!!!!! Enough said. As a rational man and a Newt supporter I see no other choice.
    He’s already got a solid record of accomplishments IN OFFICE for conservative values.
    He beats Obama in debate hands down and I don’t give a hoot who he’s screwed in the past. By the way his previous “sick” wife is still alive and kicking and drawing alimoney. The Dems can’t use that against him because it seems to me that we’ve had some other Presidents
    that screwed around in office and were beloved and honored by many on the other side. Does the Kennedys and the Clintons ring a bell? Ron Paul would make a good chairman of the Federal Reserve in the next administration. Somebody elect him to that!!!!! If he dies in office so be it. Were no worse off than the Chicago goon squad we have in there now.

  • http://Google Greg

    The Libs would love Ron Paul to be the candidate ,Obummer would tear him a new ass hole in 2 seconds flat.All he would have to say is “HEY Grand Paul ! …..

  • henrygottfried

    I’ve been reading most of the comments re: Ron Paul and others. It seems the worst ones are all or either idiots, socialists, anarchists, communists, nazis, anti-semites, non-educated, high school dropouts. They don’t realize the most important thing in this election is the economy and jobs and Mitt Romney is the man to turn the economy around. We must defeat Obuma for the sake of this country. Ron Paul is NOT the answer.

    • Al

      Mitt is Pro War, Pro Patriot Act, Pro Gun Control, Pro Federal Reserve and is backed by Goldman Sachs…. He’s Obama all over again…

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Patriot 101

      The most important issue in the upcoming election is FREEDOM. Do you want the freedom to have a job or a govt. thug making you do your job?
      This is going to be your future if Romney is the next dictator.

  • http://Google Phil C

    If Ron Paul was matched up against Obamamama he would wind up like McGovern did against Nixon in the early seventies. Anyone that talks third-party in order to run is an egotistical fool, and this is coming from an ultra-conservative, me.

  • Chris

    “First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.”
    – Mahatma Gandhi

    Ron Paul 2012

    • Are You Serious

      Holy Cow!!!!!

      • Pepper

        Moo! Your point is…?

  • howzzat

    They all have HUGE warts from their past and they are all trying to cover them with pancake makeup to try and fool us, except for ron paul. And I guarantee you that I am not a total ron paul fan. BUT at least he is a true conservative with some loony ideas. And he may be old, but so what? If he is the nominee I would vote for him, but NONE of the others. Too many BIG warts proving they are not conservative, or they would not have supported some of the legislation and concepts that they did.
    At least ron paul is truly conservative and hopefully congress would stop his loonier ideas.
    And then maybe due to the 2010 elections a true tea party conservative will rise in the ranks for the 2016 elections to be a serious contender. And wipe out all these RINO’s. I suppose one can dream!
    Otherwise, I will vote for obama, and hopefully after another 4 years even most stupid Americans will see how socialism is ruining America. Some of these really stupid voters have to be knocked in the head with a 2X4 really hard!

  • Wake Up

    Being a delegate and and a Republican who has actually read the Republican platform and the Constitution, Ron Paul is the only one who abides by them. People that don’t like him, don’t study for themselves, but listen only to Tv and radio to get their info. It’s funny that they say they did research, But you know they didn’t because they use the same exact words the media uses. Oops, they showed their ignorance! Do these people know who has run their government so far and why the media is wanting to do away with Ron Paul? Do they know that Romney, Newt, santorum, and Perry have dealings with the CFR? Wow, they are in for a rude awakening when they google CFR to study it. They may change their minds.

  • http://HANDSOFSTONE RONNIE G

    I HAVE VOTED REPUBLICAN ALL MY LIFE . NEVER AGAIN AFTER READING ALL THE COMMENTS I KNOW THIS COUTRY IS GOING DOWN THE TUBE.WE DESERVE OBAMA. THIS COUNTRY AS ITS HEAD UP ITS ASS

    • Are You Serious

      Amen!!!!!!!!

    • ANTICRIME

      @RonnieG, There is no cure for hard-wired Liberals who are the ones with heads in dark places! ~ THE TRUTH would set them free, but they love the stench and darkness of their abodes!

      Bottom Line: Get yourself INFORMED on the U.S. Constitution and the WORDS of our founders and walk to the polls with those intent on saving America from tyranny!
      When you become frustrated and throw in the proverbial towel, then you enemy…WINS!!!

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • Tom

    hey Clifford, could it be that your statement: “There are many libiots that just spend their day putting up posts on Conservative sites that may make it seem like ron paul’s support is greater than it is.” is your attempt at reverse psychology? Paul is the only candidate who leaves me with no wonders whether he believes in constitutional America, and that in itself is the only evidence i’ve seen that any of these candidates give a damn about preserving America and her liberty as it is meant to be. The people who get labeled as right wing extremists nowadays were considered honest to God Americans before Kennedy came along and the hippie movement took hold……open your eyes folks!

  • http://Justthefacts Tom

    I hate it when a person has no valid points to make so they revert to name calling. I’m not a Paul fan because of what I’ve heard him say: “Iran has a right to nuclear weapons. “The US with it’s involvement in world affairs caused the attacks on the US.” He’s not in favor of free trade, We shouldn’t be the worlds police-really, who do we entrust with that? the UN? Age, sex, race etc. shouldn’t be a factor. Grow up name-callers and educate yourself with sources other than your favorite propagandist sites.

    • ANTICRIME

      YES TOM, Iran is a SOVEREIGN COUNTRY with just as much right to protect itself as the U.S., Israel or any other nuclear nation! ~ They would commit suicide in attacking any nuclear nation! Have you ever heard of nuclear arms being used as a DETERANT to attack?!

      Ron Paul is NOT in favor of “free trade” where the U.S. products going to China have tariffs but goods coming into the U.S. FROM China are tariff-free! ~ Get your facts straight, my friend!

      WHERE in the U.S. Constitution does it say that America is to police the world by having military bases within sovereign nations at the cost of U.S. taxpayers?!

      As you were not specific in regards to age, sex, race, I will withhold comment until such time as you clarify yourself.

      ***RON PAUL~THE NEW SPIRIT OF 76***

  • Catfish

    All it takes to vote against Paul. He does not believe in homeland security and he has always been a nut and that would be a 76 year old nut.

    • ticktockoma
    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      You don’t know what you are talking about, asshole.

      • donald

        You know, MVD, your vulgarity and limited vocabulary make you sound just like a liberal democrat. If you’d make an effort to put forth a cogent and reasoned argument without the crude, you might be taken seriously and have an impact.

  • Diane Embry

    No one ever questions Ron Paul’s record. Actually he does not have one. He has been in the House for 23 years, has sponsored 620 bills and only got one passed……the sale of a building in Houston. He may have got a pass on this but of course Obama would not give him one.
    Since he cannot get anything done in 23 years as a member of Congress how does anyone think he could work with them as President?

    • Dagny

      “Criticizing Ron Paul for not passing bills in Congress is like
      criticizing a nun in a whore house for not turning tricks. He was there
      to stop the “whoring,” not become one!” ~ Blake Buffington

  • just sayin

    The Huffington Post! I love it!

  • Dave W

    Ron Paul wouldn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell in a debate against the Socialist Radical Muslim Illegally Occupying the White House. The only real political talent Obama has is his ability to campaign and arouse the uninformed populace in America to do his bidding. Look at how the Occupy Protestors swoon over him. Remember Obama is achieving his unpopular policies by circumventing the United States Congress and the US Constitution. He has implemented many policies and has approved a large number of controversal agency appointments without even a hint of consideration of congressional assessment. Many of Obamas actions during his tenure as POTUS have been un-American and many border on Treason. However no Elected Official has even attempted to hold this Rogue Dictatorial Regime accountable for their actions and initiated IMPEACHMENT proiceedings. Don’t ever be lulled into thinking that Obama will be easy to beat. It is going to take a really strong candidate to defeat Obama and Ron Paul symply is not that candidate. He does have some very good ideas but his bad ideas outweigh the good.

  • Spider

    If Paul wins we all lose, BIGTIME! I agree with his views on the Fed. but that’s all. He reminds me of Professor Erwin Corry…. just another rambling Nut Job! Newt is the only one that can win a debate with the “liar in Chief”

    • Al

      Newt?

      How is replacing a lying corrupt bankster backed politician with a lying corrupt globalist politician any benefit to the American people?

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Newt the Lizard is a CFR globalist puppet, you pathetic ass.

      • donald

        You cannot make ANY points without vulgarity? Sign of a limited vocabulary, limited intelligence and acting like a liberal democrat!

  • Catfish

    Ron Paul is an embarasesment to all Texans.

    • Wayne

      I am a Texan and he does not embarase me.Ron Paul in 2012. Anyone instead of Obama.

    • donald

      Certainly is!

    • Karl Kocher

      catfish why do you speak for all of the good Texans?
      You embarrass yourself and me.

  • Dan

    There’s not much to say here. From where we are now a monkey is electable if people are serious about getting our country back. I don’t believe there are Communist monkeys?

  • Dan

    There’s not much to say here. From where we are now a monkey is electable if people are serious about getting our country back. I don’t believe there are Communist monkeys?

  • James

    If you want to watch a great video, check out Peace propaganda and the Promised Land. I don’t know if this link will work. If not, just google it, watch it and make iup your own mind. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2165626245072381061

  • Kenneth

    I disagree 100% with the author of this article. Dr. Paul is too radical to win the election.

    • Patriot 101

      You apparently think Obama is “mainstream” then. Wake up! Or maybe you are just trolling….

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      What’s too radical about Ron Paul? The fact that he has been consistently pro-constitution in his voting record? You blind bitch.

      • Are You Serious

        Get sexually involved with yourself!!!

  • Mike

    I was a Ron Paul supporter before I read the name calling and Obamaesque attitude of those posting on here. ” By their fruits ye shall know them”.. The foul hatred and anger they spew show their true colors… Evil…

    • Pepper

      Millicent? just sayin? d rash? patriotrenegade?

      These fine examples are not the Ron Paul supporters.

      If you’re coming here expecting constructive and polite dialog, sorry about that.

  • messup

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=icNTs30ZRvQ

    Reason No 1 why Mr. Paul will not be elected: Islamism and Islamic extremism in the USA, i.e., CAIR/Muslim Brotherhood/Sharia Law (please educate your friends and neighbors by viewing this compleeing video).

    Reason No. 2 Mr. Paul won’t be elected is he’s a Sino-Soviet sympathizer.

    Reason No. 3Mr. Paul won’t be elected is he allows his campaign to be organized, funded and run by 60′s and 70′s anti-war crowd and their sympathizers (the likes of Bill Ayers, Saul Alinskyites, et al)…somewhere in the deepest recesses of this campaign smacks of a Soros connection.

    Reason No.4 Mr. Paul won’t be elected is his Congressional record is not too different than current White House’s occupants record while voting in the Senate…zero benefits for Our Blessed USA.

    Reason No. 5 Mr. Paul won’t be elected is his drum beat. It’s one designed for his public. Contrasted with his voting record…a dichotomy arises, creating consternation in his electorate. Which Mr. Paul is it that’s speaking today…congressional Ron Paul or Stump Stormin’ Ron Paul?
    A true We The Elite People of culture of corruption Washington DC insider. Just look at how long he’s been in Congress doing absolutely nothing. Geez! Wake-up.

    Reason No. 6 Mr. Paul won’t be elected President is he’ll have another do-nothing Administration. His policies will be so at odds with all Electorate that what Mr. Obama hasn’t done will seem a cake-walk next to a Ron Paul “do-nothing” administration.

    Amen! Wake-up!

    • Wayne

      messup how do you know all of these things? Have you been setting beside him in congress all these years?

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Your 6 reasons are baseless and uninformed crap. RON PAUL 2012.

  • Cameron

    Ron Paul will win. Everyone who says he is crazy give no evidence to back it up. Listen to what he is saying. He is taking more independents and dems than all the other candidates. He is consistent. He is opposite of Obama on everything. He is getting major endorsements. He will beat Obama in a debate because he is on point on the real issues. Obama is destroying himself. Paul has warned us for yrars about our crisis. Thankfully people are paying attention

  • Jeffrey Hardin

    Every single one of our elected leaders are weak, selfish, outright vain, narcissist, pompous cold blooded blow hearts, who cannot be trusted to up hold our constitutional rights as citizens of this exceptional Nation, yet we flounder and roll over for those very characters in the men and woman we elect, like fish out of the water we suffer ourselves. We did this, we elected them and kept them in office, and we knew they were corrupt. We did this to our self. Look how we are falling at the feet of Ron Paul, this guy hates Israeli’s and the Jew population here and abroad, he is more dangerous than Obama. When are we going to wake the hell up. Like the Israeli’s of old, they were given one sign after another, yet they could not believe that their Father’s son, came here to deliver unto us, a way into the kingdom of our heavenly Father, they brought horrors upon their own heads because of it, and so have we, and so will we. I will not vote for Romney nor Paul, regardless of the consequences, I just cannot…If we do not get this right, we will pay for it, and so will the innocent amongst us, being our Children and grand children…Ron Paul and Romney are dangerous!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Jeffrey, why are you spouting lies about our next president, Ron Paul? RON PAUL 2012!

      • Are You Serious

        Very very funny. Ron Paul President. Yeah sure. Not a chance!!!!

  • Joyceann

    The only thing worse than Ron Paul is the Paulbots. People may have listened to him, he might be a more electable candidate if it wern’t for the Paulbots. No matter what your belief, if you talk like a nasty name-calling arm flapping idiot, nobody will listen. You’ve done more harm than good….the trick is to present your idea in a way that is conducive to thinking, but the Polbots call you names before they even hear your position or question. Me thinks thou dost protest too much – what are you trying to cover up? Could it be Paul’s smack-whack type of business?

    • Al

      At Joyceann;

      I’ve been in support of Ron Paul for some time now and to be perfectly honest, I’ve seen much more name calling from those who oppose Ron Paul and his supporters than from Ron Paul supporters. I’m not saying that it doesn’t happen, but from where I sit your argument presented holds little to no merit…

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Joyceann, I think you are a smack-whacker, and my definition of a smack-whacker is probably different than yours.

      Go smack-whack yourself, dumb bitch.

      • donald

        Boy have you got class, MVD! Sounds like something Debbie Wasserman Schultz might say!

      • Dagny

        MVD, I strongly suspect you are an anti- Paul shill. I have NEVER run into one of his supporters who is as vulgar and disrespectful as you. Rep. Paul is a complete gentleman and most of his supporters try very hard to emulate him. It’s generally the progressives and neo cons who are foul and disrespectful. They sometimes pretend to be Paul supporters in a vile attempt to discredit him in the eyes of the undecided.

  • John Bailiff

    He’s an anti Semite, that alone will count him out with me. That and his foreign policy is loonytoons.

    • Patriot 101

      “anti-semite” is a mainstream propoganda lie!
      You really need to stop spreading the lies, do your own investigation into the mans record on Israel and what he actually says regarding Israel.

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      who cares John, your vote will be insignificant anyway.

      RON PAUL 2012!

  • blackhawk

    Ahhhh Give the old coot a break.

  • bulldustin

    Ron Paul is as scarry as Ovomit. One wants the nation as his the other wants the Nation to stay at home untill they Abomb us GOD SAVE AMERICA

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      Paranoid schizophrenic asshole.

  • Patricia

    There are so many good things about each candidate, here, in my opinion, would be the ideal thing to happen after ONE of them gets the nod, regardless of which one. I would like that candidate to say to the others, “If you can accept me as the President then I would like your help. Let’s talk and see about finding you the place in the administration that fits your strengths. It will take more than one person to do the job facing the mess America is in today if we wish to clean it up and save it for future generation. Let’s work together as a team and create the best administration this country has ever seen.”

    • Frank

      Sounds good, but if another big government R or D get’s elected, we won’t solve our problems.

  • Scott

    Paul haters are so funny. They claim they want someone who will support the constitution, but are willing to vote for someone who tramples the constitution like Romney or Gingrich, opposed to Paul who has written several books on the subject and is a constitutionalist. Paul would be a million times better than Obama, and he actually likes American unlike Obama, so stop being so negative and brainwashed, and do some research instead of listening to the mainstream media.

  • Ziva McCabe

    Sadly, my man bowed out last night. How he could get behind Mitt Romney is beyond me. I praise Ron Paul for getting into the race, actually checked him out before I threw my entire support behind Jon Huntsman. Ron Paul has the difficulty of getting the Senate and Congress to back him IF he were elected President. I don’t see that happening. What I do see happening is a splintering of the Republican party and no viable options… I think Obama will win by default.

    If I stick to my personal guns, I would have to do a write in campaign for Huntsman.

    Romney’s mindset is more of what got the USA into the mess we presently find ourselves, Gingrich is cronyism at is best and more of the same mindset we do NOT need, Santorum has never governed a state, for that matter neither have Paul or Gingrich and unless you have actually had experience governing a state it is my feeling that the candidate is just another hog at the feed bag… like Obama. Without experience of governing, and running a State’s check book in the BLACK, how in hell does one wrap their minds around a whole country’s check book?

    As a Junior Senator, Obama had the opportunity to vote up or down expanding the debt limits under Bush… he voted no each time … now that the shoes are on HIS feet, he expects us to raise the debt limits again and again and again. Well this needs to stop. We need to defeat Obama, and sadly I would venture to say “at any cost”… but I personally Hate Mitt Romney, and will not vote for him, even if Huntsman is his running mate… Romney is a clown. Any man who even jokingly is willing to toss off a 10K bet (at Perry in a debate) will be willing to throw around YOUR money as well. I detest Romney. His life style has been flagrant and disgusting… more of what will not serve America. He has state he has never been poor… well I have, and worked hard to get where I did in my lifetime. HE cannot relate to those whose votes he desperately wants! He isn’t “real”.

    At the Town Hall meeting in Swanzey, NH Huntsman took the time to speak with me before and after his speech. We told him about our status, we asked the hard questions and he actually seemed to care…

    While standing outside at the polls in the cold from 8:45 to 7 pm on Primary day here in NH, several folks scanned the crowd of supporters for their particular candidate. I saw several give me a thumbs up before they went in to vote, or even more a “YES!” looking right at me. Several people asked me why I supported Huntsman and many more who voted for Obama last year came to me after they voted to tell me they voted for my man because they saw him as the “voice of reason” and the “voice of sanity” among those in the Republican race… less than a week after his statement about “#3 being a ticket to ride”, it would appear that “he don’t care”(Beatles).

    And there you have it… the Republican party torn asunder… I don’t want to vote holding my nose… We need term limits, we need a balanced budget, AND we need a President, Senate and Congress filled with individuals whose health care and benefits are also shared with the people who put them in office! They should not receive any more than those who elected them, and I don’t want to see Career Politicians in our futures. Their perks would make you sick if you knew what they received. If they receive fabulous health care as a perk, then so should every person in the USA have access to the same level of excellence in health care benefits. Their pensions for performing their civic duties are sickening, while people like my husband and I are out here, worked all our lives and are now jobless, me for 20 months when the economy went south and I had to close my business, and my husband was a civilian who worked 25 years for the defense Contractor: Textron, Wilmington, Massachusetts. They had a work force of about 5000 and it is down to about 500 now… Thank you Mr. Obama… new technologies were being pursued and suddenly those contracts fell away into the Obama abyss…

    The Severance package is gone. We dismantled half of our 401K with a prayer of finding employment before having to dismantle the other half still finding ourselves unemployed. I am grateful for unemployment benefits or my husband… I cannot collect having been my own business entity.

    I have been working since I was 14 and I will be 57 in February. My husband is 57 as well. If you think employers don’t age profile think again… we are both professionals have experience up the ying yang and cannot find work. But I hear Canada is hiring in my husband’s field of expertise… GOD HELP THE USA.

    • Frank

      All I can say is remember what the Founding Fathers wanted: small, Constitutionally limited government. For foreign policy: free trade & avoid foreign entanglements. That’s Ron Paul!

  • David

    How many times does it have to be said before you CULTISTS realize the TRUTH? Ron Paul IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN!!!! He is a LIBERTARIAN whose party does not have enough money to support him so therefore he is using you to get more money ONLY!

    He’s a doddering old fool with crazy ideas like isolationism who Obvomit will tear to shreds in the first day of the campaign.

    And I, along with 99% of REAL CONSERVATIVES, WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM! We will create a third party, whether it loses or not, rather than vote for EITHER OBAMA or PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • donald

      Bad move. Even Ron Paul would be better than obama!

    • Frank

      Check out what our Founding Fathers wanted & what Ron Paul wants, then find out who really is the true conservative of all the candidates.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        RON PAUL 2012!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      David, pull your head out of your ass, please.

    • Patriot 101

      Speak for yourself. I’m conservative and will vote for Ron Paul. I hope that enough REPUBLICANS wake up soon enough for him to be the REPUBLICAN nominee!
      If they don’t I think Ron Paul will launch a 3rd party run with the support of the Constitutional and a lot of the social conservatives. These two groups of Republicans will be joined by the anti-war democrats (that Obama lied to) and an overwhelming number of Independents to elect a 3rd party president! When this occurs, the Republican Party will be officially dead, and good riddance!

    • Al

      Come on now Dave…

      That’s a bit of a stretch isn’t it? As a conservative, can you really disagree with Ron Paul on his fiscal views and strategies? And if not, knowing that he’s very conservative on spending shouldn’t that be enough to support him if nominated?

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Nick

    The concept of Ron Paul being “electable” ranks with the pope declaring that he has been an atheist all along and Obama going to Europe and making speeches reminding people what a great and generous nation America is. If, by some weird mischance [e.g. discovering Romney was born in Canada] Paul got the nomination, the hysterical laughter and partying in the White House could be heard from one end of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to the other.

    After Obama is elected for another four years, to put the final nails in the coffin of this great country, pundits would comment that, once more, the Republicans snatched defeat from the jaws of victory, putting up an old f*rt of a candidate with zero appeal to anyone under age 50 with an IQ above room temperature. As an air force vet myself I applaud Paul’s military service, as I did those of Bush Sr. and McCain – the sad fact is that, other than some ex-servicemen, nobody cares! If being close to senility wasn’t enough, Paul is also a way-out whacko like Barry Goldwater and Ross Perrot, with crazy ideas about decimating our military and giving Iran the OK with its nukes.

    • Justwhistlingdixie

      To Nick; , putting up an old f*rt of a candidate with zero appeal to anyone under age 50 with an IQ above room temperature.
      You proabaly need shock treatments, so I will give you this one, for free.
      Ron Paul has the largest base of supporters of any republican candidate and that base is largely composed of young adults 18 to 35 , colledge students, all branches of the miliatry, and from free market economists, and people with IQ’s of at least 101.

      Judging by your comments on the military, I would guess if you actually were in the military, you were proabaly in the inteligence group.

    • Frank

      Don’t buy the “unelectable” sound bite. It’s what the Power Elite that control the MSM want you to think.

  • http://actforamerica brian

    Dr. Paul is the last hope for America. Dr. Paul has a long record on fighting for our constitutional rights. The foresight to predict where we are now from back in 2002 is impressive.

  • Ronnie Ohio

    I am an ol long time volunteer. I worked on the 1st 2 campaigns of Clarence Miller from Ohio who was a conservative Congressman who fought pork & waste. Thats how I first became aware of Ron Paul. Everything in life is relative to surrounding events & relationships. Presidents usually are handpicked by the most powerful crime families on this planet. But, the events in Pauls life have aligned themselves together to make Ron Paul the most popular political figure in the GOP & at least BHO’s equal if not his superior in public support.

    I do believe NO ONE the American people need as President is “out there” except Ron Paul. I have played dozens of past Paul speeches captured on Youtube videos. I watched the debates. I know his “pledges”. He is not a liar. He means what he says.

    Supporters need to donate some funds, their very public support often in gear & with signs, & show up at his events & GO VOTE. Join in as a phone bank system volunteer. Wear his gear daily in public. Do alot of RON PAULing. If not YOU? WHO?

    Our nation is deeply in trouble. BHO is an evil cancer. USA needs to see & hear Ron Paul take BHO on & dissect his past, and his words & his proposals & his changing of our Republic openly in the discourse of a political fight one on one. It would electrify Americans watching that play out.

  • Ronnie Ohio

    I am an ol long time volunteer. I worked on the 1st 2 campaigns of Clarence Miller from Ohio who was a conservative Congressman who fought pork & waste. Thats how I first became aware of Ron Paul. Everything in life is relative to surrounding events & relationships. Presidents usually are handpicked by the most powerful crime families on this planet. But, the events in Pauls life have aligned themselves together to make Ron Paul the most popular political figure in the GOP & at least BHO’s equal if not his superior in public support.

    I do believe NO ONE the American people need as President is “out there” except Ron Paul. I have played dozens of past Paul speeches captured on Youtube videos. I watched the debates. I know his “pledges”. He is not a liar. He means what he says.

    Supporters need to donate some funds, their very public support often in gear & with signs, & show up at his events & GO VOTE. Join in as a phone bank system volunteer. Wear his gear daily in public. Do alot of RON PAULing. If not YOU? WHO?

    Our nation is deeply in trouble. BHO is an evil cancer. USA needs to see & hear Ron Paul take BHO on & dissect his past, and his words & his proposals & his changing of our Republic openly in the discourse of a political fight one on one. It would electrify Americans watching that play out.

  • yblat

    I am definitely NOT a Ron Paul supporter but do think he has some valuable ideas. If only he wasn’t an isolationist and IF ONLY he supported Israel could he be considered as a viable candidate. Those who have mentioned that nobody would want to (or could afford to for future reputations) be his running mate, I agree with! That would be suicide!!

    • 57 girl

      Ron Paul is NOT an isolationist. He is an non-interventionist. They are two different things. PLEASE go to his website and listen to Dr. Paul directly. The Media will push their agenda and try to poison Dr. Paul’s message any way they can. And I’ve seen quite a few clips from Israeli’s that would prefer that America keep her foreign aid money and stay out of their business. Israel is well armed and fully capable of taking care of their own affairs. That does not mean that Ron Paul is against them by any means. Please do some research into those areas that are not clear in your mind as to where Ron Paul stands. We as a Nation have got to stand beside the one man that will stand beside us and our Nation. We are fighting for America’s Sovereignty, not Israels. Think about it.

      • Al

        At 57 girl:

        Great Post… I’ve noticed that a majority of people that oppose Dr. Paul try to use the whole “He’s an Isolationist” when he clearly isn’t. Again, Great Post and keep up the good work! :)

        Ron Paul 2012!!!

      • Karl Kocher

        57 Girl – I hope people take your advice and do the research.
        MSM is not a real news outlet.
        RON PAUL 2012

      • Patriot 101

        57 girl,
        Glad you’re here! I’m tired of replying to all the dis-information being posted about Ron Paul! We can use your help!

    • Mundus Vult Decepi

      If Ron Paul was in reality an isolationist (which he is NOT) and if he did not support Israel (which he does) it wouldn’t make a damn difference to me. RON PAUL 2012!

  • Fireplace

    I used to think Ron Paul was a nut case, but he was getting ignored sooo much after winning so many straw polls (17 t0 Newt’s one, and more then any other candidate), and was not even being mentioned when results came out. FOX, CNN, MSNBC, and ALL their talking heads pretended he didn’t exist. THAT’S what caused me to really investigate and see where this man is coming from. Far from the “nut case” and “joke” the media was spinning, I found an articulate, sane, reasonable, approuch from a gentleman in perfect health, and a sound mind, who believes in he Constitution. He’s far from being an Isolationist, has sound foreign policy and if ANYONE investigates honestly and uses a critical open mind, you’ll see that the established powers that put us into the mess we are in today, are scared S——s of this guy. Huntsman worked for Obama; is now supporting Romney- who was also endorsed by that RINO McCain; Romney is backed by Goldman-Sachs, B of A, Chase, etc; and it’s fact that it was Romney’s men who coached Obama’s team in implementing Obamacare….vote for anyone BUT Paul and we’ll continue to nation build in more then the nine contries we’re fighting in already. Enough is enough. Vote Paul for 2012.

    • Frank

      Well put.

  • Keith Mathison

    A nation that has forgotten the Lord their God elects a closet Muslim, and now is stupid enough to consider a Mormon cultist and a licentious libertarian… I guess if the prostitutes love Ron Paul that is good enough for you? We have become self-centered instead of God-centered as a nation so my recommendation is dust off your Bibles and read it in 2012 before you vote. We need a revival in the hearts of the American people.

  • Scott

    To those of you who are complaining that Paul is not a republican – who cares?!? There are nearly as many corrupt repubs as libtards! The idea is to get the person in office who is trying to dismantle the constitution, and replace him with someone who wants to reinstate the constitution. Stop paying attention to titles and the 2 party system!

    • Fletchguy

      Its not about 2 parties it’s about core beliefs and Ron Paul does not share the core beliefs of those who identify with republicans or the Tea Party. Cripple our military advantage and legalize crack, heroine, and any drug out there is not a good idea and are very huge flaws he has and sorry th GOP and TP will not vote for a man who seriously thinks those are good ideas.The liberals may love him since he is pretty much a liberal in every way but not the GOP.

      • Frank

        False, see my comments below.

  • 57 girl

    It is hard to hide the truth. The thing about Ron Paul, whenever people make their accusations, we “Paulbots” can come up with videos and clips to denounce the lies. Whereas those that are spreading them can’t back up their accusations. The truth shall prevail. And that racist BS from 20 years ago only goes to show that the establishment and their goons can’t come up with any real dirt. Yesterday, I posted clip after clip of black Americans that are campaigning for Ron Paul because they know he is not the racist the Media accuses him of being. Freedom is freedom and it doesn’t matter how we as individuals are packaged so to speak. It is hard to try to defame and honest man. Anyone that truly loves America and wants to see her maintain her heritage and her Sovereignty had better be seeking the truth, PDQ. We don’t have much time left to elect the ONLY Candidate that will lead us back to our Constitutional rights and our Freedoms on which this Nation was founded.

    • Fletchguy

      Can you link me to a video of him saying he does not want to legalize crack, meth, cocaine or lsd??? That alone make him an idiot. next please link me to a video where he does not want to close our very much needed over seas military bases for premptive saftey….These are very very huge issues with him and 2 of the main reasons he has no republican or Tea Party support. If these are false please show the links you claim. Thanks

      • Frank

        I’m Tea Party for Ron Paul.
        How has the War on Drugs gone? Have you had your house robbed (like me) yet by a drug addict desperate to buys drugs? You like powerful Drug Lords (like the Mafia during Prohibition)?
        Alcoholism & drug addiction are wrong, but let’s admit it: the War on Drugs has failed as has been tried so far. Time for another option.

      • Pepper

        Did I miss it?

        Prohibition of liquor required an amendment to the Constitution.

        Which amendment was it that allowed federal prohibition of the other substances?

  • Lloud Bayley

    If you are the one nominated to run against obama I will vote for you.

  • Bill

    Concerned AmericanA: you say we need someone you can bring in Independents; where do you think this overwhelming amount of support for Paul is coming from? If he was only supported by Republicans he would not have the support that he does have…party liners like you are evidence of that. Party line Republicans are what gave us the Republican liberal GBII. It is high time people stop voting for the party and.start voting for.the individual stance of a candidate.

    • Fletchguy

      Problem is he may get independents and liberals but no honest republican or Tea Party member could vote for this loon. He is basically a liberal wanting to hide as a GOP member which is is not.

      • Frank

        Not true. I’m a Tea Party Republican voting for Ron Paul.
        Stop listening to MSM talking points.

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Who cares if the Tea Party members or RepublicRATS don’t vote for him? He will win in spite of these retards.

  • lynn @ cathy

    ron paul for freedom..

    • Keith Mathison

      Libertarian license is not freedom. I guess if prostitutes love Ron Paul that is good enough for you?

      • Mundus Vult Decepi

        Yep.

  • Jeanne M

    I pray this crazed idiot never sees the oval office.
    Again, not a bad man except that his isolationist policies would doom this country and the world!
    We need a commonsense, moral leader who understands how to get the right things done and protect our Constitution and our Nation at the same time! Mitt Romney is the only candidate who can fill the bill. Now the question is as American voters can we come together and save this country. We need to rally to Romney and build a solid base of support for this leader-we should not wait till the national convention to do this. If we wait we give Obama the edge one more time.

    • Fletchguy

      Exactly Ron Paul has a few good ideas on economics but as far as reality goes he is in cooc coo land and is not to be ever looked at seriously.

      • Ed

        If you are for the “status quo” then, yes I agree Ron Paul’s ideas may seem coo-coo…
        The thing is Ron Paul is sanity in your insane world.

    • Ed

      He’s not “isolationist”
      Repeating this right wing mantra still doesn’t make it true. I know nothing I say will penetrate that thick skull, dunno why i try.

    • Ed

      So Romney will stop the multiple unconstitutional wars and the killing of innocent people which incites hatred against us? Romney is the person to do this? Romney will “protect our Constitution”?? Are you on crack?

    • Frank

      Please, Romney is more of the same big government politician that got us into this mess. Ron Paul is a non-interventionist, not an isolationist… like our Founding Fathers wanted.

    • Drop Dead Fred

      Your delerious. All you have to do is look at his record in Massachussets. Are they better off because of them? As a Neibor of Mass and a proud voter in the NH primary I see all the time the devestation to Mass financially because of Guys like him. Aside for California you will not find a more liberal state. Romney is nothing more than a liberal in conservatives cloathing. He is the liberals coservative alternative to O’bummer.
      I cannot believe the shear volume of rubes out there who dis Ron paul from moving from the Libertarian party to the Republican. But little if none about Romney’s flopping around like a fish out of water. A relativly logical move on Ron Pauls part considering that the Republican party was once the home to conservatives, not RINO’S, and the Libertarian party’s main focus is trying to force conservatisim and Constitutionality on the Government the way our founding fathers intended.
      Now try and explain any alledged logic pertaining to Romneys epic leap from the Democratic party to the Republican party. I truely hope that someone out there can enlighten me on this topic.

  • Bill

    Rush limbaugh and Mark Levins do not like Ron Paul and that is good enough for me!

    • http://wolfpack2012.net JThaddeustoad

      Rush Limbaugh …… should shut his fat mouth ….. Here is a guy who has alot to say about how this country should be run ….. but he cannot even manage his own reckless existance with multiple marriages and propensity for drugs…..

    • pdol

      Wow! Talk radio show hosts determine your politics…that’s pretty sad.

    • Ed

      Bill you are the epitome of what is wrong here in the US.

    • Pepper

      “Romney loves me this I know,
      for the radio tells me so.”

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      BILL, RIGHT ON, I AGREE !

  • http://wolfpack2012.net JThaddeustoad

    I like Ron Paul and I applaud his courage …… He is an anachronism his policies would have worked if they were inacted in 1964 …… The sad facts are he can never win an election because of the selfishness of the entitlement generation …… 48 out of every 100 americans are getting a check from the government ……. Perhaps after we go through a bankrupsy Ron Paul would consider once again to seek the office ….. In reality today,I would think he would make an excellent chairmen of the Fed ….. this nation needs to do business or we are toast….

    • Frank

      Ron Paul can win if America wakes up to the fact that big government Rs & Ds are ruining our nation (it’s turned into a big welfare/warfare/police state). Even the 50% that collect more from the government than they pay in are having their freedoms taken away.

    • Patriot 101

      There is no such thing as an excellent man to head a totally corrupt and unconstitutional criminal enterprise like the Federal Reserve! This is the problem with many people; they don’t understand the basic premise that the “FED” is not any part of our government! It is all powerful now, printing the money we need to operate on a day to day basis!
      Congress was to “Coin the money and regulate the value thereof”! Now thanks to the “Progressives” and corruption we have a Federal Reserve Bank that has us all enlisted as slaves forever. Ron Paul wants to BREAK FREE from the “FED”, and he is the only one that will get us free again!

  • Ed

    Paul / Romney 2012 or Romney / Paul 2012! This the only combo that will defeat Zer0Bama.

    • http://wolfpack2012.net JThaddeustoad

      Romney /Gingrich/Paul …… Checks and balances …… Romney brings capital to the 2012 race …… let us not forget the OBama campaign has a billion dollars ….. capital goes where the power is….. Romneys’ Bain capital funded 29 campaigns over the past few years and 26 of them were democrats…. This year capital will flow to the republicans with the right candidate ….. capitalists are business men not politicians …… in order to effect change the GOP needs the house and the senate as well as the presidency….

      • Patriot 101

        Bain Capital (I heard) is giving more money to the democratic party than to Romney!

  • Fletchguy

    The writer must be smoking crack. Ron Paul has no chance to win and can not even be looked at seriously. He is definatly not a republican and really not a Tea Party guy. Any idiot who is for legalization of crack, cocaine, meth and lsd has issues. Then throw in his hate for preventitive military and the need for strategic points of military bas operations while believing covering your eyes and ears pretending it’s all ok well he is a nut. No one with any real brain would even consider Ron paul to be a person worthy of the White House. His loyal wack job followers are the loudest but tend to be living in make believe land like Obama supporters.

    • Frank

      TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party stands for 3 main principles:
      1. Fiscal responsibility
      2. Free markets
      3. Limited government.

      Tea Party people (like me) should support Ron Paul! Don’t listen to all the MSM (including Fox) spin. Check out things for yourself on the Internet.

      • Patriot 101

        Fox News is so “in the tank” for Romney, they should be embarrassed, ashamed! O’Reilly and Hannity especially! Fair & Balanced? Looks like they are going to need a new motto! Even the “Hard News” people like Chris Wallace are out against Ron Paul with “Gotcha” questions or else they just “forget to mention” that he is in 2nd place in SC and closing fast on Romney! Romney’s numbers are SOFT! He is losing support to Paul, Santorum and maybe Gingrich too.Turn ‘em off!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      FLETCHGUY, I AGREE, HE WILL NOT WIN, PLUS HE WOULD NOT HAVE A CHANCE AGAINST OBAMA…RON PAUL SCARES THE HELL OUT OF AN AWFUL LOT OF AMERICANS BECAUSE OF HIS COMMENTS & BELIEFS ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS… ANY ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD NOT SAY DRUGS SHOULD BE LEGAL, AND HE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY ?? I DO BELIEVE HE IS A NUT CASE , MY OPINION AS OTHERS HAVE THEIRS !

  • pdol

    for any of you who think he is a fool – watch this:
    http://www.youtube.com/user/CollectiveCheckup

    • Frank

      Listen America!

  • Lovelegalimmigration

    SAMTORUM 2012!

  • Eleanor Anderson

    As far as I’m concerned, and listening to Ron Paul in the debates, Oh, yeah, he’s unelectable allright. His foreign policy and attitude towards Israel ate downright un-american. To put it bluntly, the man is a nut!

  • Evelyn

    You didn’t list 6 reasons why Ron Paul is electable. All you said was that he isn’t what everyone says he is. It was a waste of space to even print this and the title is misleading. Give me reasons to believe he is the best candidate. I want fact with proof not just comments stating someone else is lying.

  • Harry Beaton
  • Bett

    too old, flake? do you ever look up the facts? 02′ he begged congress to turn the country around! 2002 predicted exactly where we would be now in link below w/congress who blew him off as most who do not know truth do as well. Insightful, wise, principles he will not sell us out! Gov’t HAS: Agenda 21, NDAA signed w/threat from obama, gun rights next, and FEMA camps to imprison us as we are being incorporated into the One World Order! see why you should not vote for another political prostitute who will say anything for a vote! Our Sovereignty at stake! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJG_oFFDK0

    • Frank

      Great link!
      All should check it out.
      How can you not vote for Ron Paul after listening to what he said in Cogress on that day in 2002. He got it all right.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001509763914 Gary Workman

    People are wising up, finally. Not only can Dr. Ron Paul win, I’m sure he’s the only Republican in the field that can. They aren’t called “Reagan Democrats” anymore. They are now “Ron Paul Democrats” and along with independents, there are many of them. From reading some these post, it’s clear there are still a lot of people who get all their news from CNN and Fox News or any one of the other controlled news outlets. Wake up folks! They are controlling you! We now have the internet. Use your head and ask a lot of questions. Don’t let a Bill O’Reilly or anyone else do your thinking for you. As Reagan said, the Left right paradigm is false. It’s keeps you busy thinking there is a difference in the Republicans and the Democrats. Romney and Obama both have the same contributors. Our Congress has sold us out to the highest bidder. They own our so-called “Free Press” and if they can they will shut down the internet as well. People all over the world are looking for America to become the bastion of Liberty she once was and are looking at Ron Paul as the only movement that can restore that shining city on the hill. I am almost 65 years old. My generation has to throw out your TV’s and realize you’ve been had. You have got to start learning to use the internet. Start out by googling Ron Paul. Then google anything you hear that you question. Google “Neoconservatism” and “Iran” and anything else that comes to mind. This is our last chance and old people like me vote more than anyone else and because of the owned media we are the most gullible. For your children and grandchildren’s sake, do as I said then make up your own mind to vote for or not vote for Ron Paul. By the way, be sure to look up all the polls. The controlled news tells you every day Ron Paul has the “Worst chance against Obama”. When you find out you’ve been lied to will you be pissed? You should be! Then I can say “Welcome to the Revolution!”

    http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/poll-ron-paul-v-obama-dead-heat-fla

    • Frank

      You are exactly right Gary. I’m 61 and most of my life I just listened to the MSM on TV for my information about what’s going on nationally & internationally. I was duped! You’ve got to make the effort to do some Google searches & check things out. Sadly, the older you are the less likely you are to do that, but the more likely you are to cast a misinformed vote.

    • Steve

      Right on, Gary. Excellent points all. Don’t call yourself old, though. One is as young as one thinks, and you have the mental flexibility it takes to stay young for quite a while.

      • Robert Stone

        Yes. history shows that people are MOST productive starting at 60. (productive people)

  • Frank

    Wow, will wonders never cease! A reasonable article by the Huffington Post!
    If you click on the link & go to the Huffington Post, you can read the comments below. Most disagree with the article and say they will still vote for Obama (from the comments I saw on the top of page 1). Their audience is big government, liberal Democrats.

    Listen America, only small government, Constitution-loving Ron Paul is the real alternative to big government, Constitution-trashing Ds & Rs.

  • Mad Mike

    If we could vote today on the issue of “confidence in the current government” what do you suppose the results would be? In England, when the “house of commons” returns a vote of “no confidence”, the government stands down, the prime minister resigns and a new government is elected. If that were the case here, Obama would have had to “pay for his own Hawaiian vacation”, 253 rounds of golf, extravant Holoween parties and multi-million dollar trips to Europe. Obama has “rubbed our noses in it” every day since January 13, 2009. It’s “pay back time”.

  • http://brave kusa

    I do like Dr. Paul. I know many doctors who are over 80 and they are brilliant still practicing medicine. We forget that president should not run the country. Then we would call it communism. Then we should have right VP like Sarah or Michelle. I am sad about some comments on conservative side and I wonder if we do not deserve what we have, the mess.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001509763914 Gary Workman

      KUSA- The funny thing is, when you look at who most of the world leaders are now and throughout history, Dr. Paul would probably still be considered one of the youngest! It’s the ideas that count, and even more importantly, a word you don’t hear much anymore, wisdom! Maybe with Dr. Paul’s rising popularity, Americans are once again appreciating that trait. As for Sarah I agree she got a bad rap and a lot of it wasn’t from liberals, but from the neoconservatives who were running John McCain’s campaign. She was too independent and wasn’t likely to buy into what they were selling once her eyes were open. She’s moving our way more and more every day. Micehlle on the other hand, would scare the hell out of me. We’re talking World War III with China being Iran’s closest ally and I get the feeling she’s got something to prove. I just want to get all the neocons out of both parties. As far as I’m concerned, they are all crazy and brainwashed.
      http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=19618

  • http://verizonyahoo james

    Ron Paul andMitt Romney two of a kind.They are both Freemasons the masons are one of the top 10 secret societys in the world.This is what i read on the computer .You should search the free masons and what they believe an then ask what are the good and the bad about the masons.Can you be a christian and a freemason,

    • Frank

      1. Not sure Ron Paul is a freemason.
      2. Even if he was, so were a lot of other good Presidents that we had, including those in our Founding fathers. Thus, is not a disqualifying reason to vote against Ron Paul.

    • Ann in Nebraska

      James, James, James. What are we to do about you? Do you not know that most of the founding fathers were Free Masons? My own father was a Free Mason, and I don’t think I could have asked for a better man to be my dad. If you knew anything about Free Masonry, you would know that they are not ogres. Check it out on Wikipedia for an over-view of Free Masonry. I’m not sure Dr. Paul is a Mason. I’ll have to investigate.

  • Marty

    If Ron Paul does not get the Republican nomination and Gary Johnson DOES get the Libertarian nomination, my vote will go to Johnson this November.

    • Frank

      The main thing about Gary Johnson I don’t like is he’s pro-abortion.
      I’d have to closely check out the other 3rd Party candidates first. But, yes, if Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, I’ll probably vote 3rd Party… especially if Romney gets it!

      • Are You Serious

        Moron alert !!!!!!!!!

        • Pepper

          Looking in the mirror again?

          • Are You Serious

            ESAD

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        FRANK, NOT WISE….THESE 3RD PARTIES WILL HELP OBAMA WIN…WHAT ON EARTH IS THE MATTER WITH YOU PEOPLE?? IS THIS ANOTHER 08, WE SCREW UP , OBAMA WINS ANOTHER 4 YEARS… I WANT OUR COUNTRY, FREEDOM, CONSTITUTION & LIVES BACK…I CERTAINLY WOULD THINK ALL AMERICANS WOULD WANT THE SAME AFTER WE ALL SEEN WHAT HAS HAPPEN THE LAST 3 YEARS…THIS IS NOTHING YET BUT GIVE OBAMA ANOTHER 4 YEARS & WE WILL NOT HAVE A FREE AMERICA!! GOD HELP US ALL !!

  • CJM

    Annie said: “he would probably have a stroke…time for a nap paul…go home and get some rest…he will never make it to the election!!!!!” And Ronald Raegan had alzheimer’s disease WHEN HE WAS FIRST ELECTED as President. Three months after he left office, it was announced that he was in the TERTIARY STAGE of the disease and you don’t get to that level in 3 short months. Even newborns have strokes, Annie, so what’s your point?

  • http://deprogrammingservices.com deprogramming services

    I remember as a long-haire­d hippie living in western Nebraska in the early 70s some of us liked to say that the hippies and the rednecks should get together and form a united front to stop the bigots from telling us how to live. A bigot of course is one who is intolerant of others; using the power of government to force others to live according to ones own beliefs is as bigoted as it gets.

    This idea makes even more sense today than it did then. Each party attacks freedom from its own angle. And those of us who just want to live and let live end up being attacked from bigots on both sides.

    Ron Paul is the only candidate I’ve seen who has proven to be serious about employing the live-and-l­et-live concept in government­. I beg my brothers and sisters here to step back away from this or that tree and look at the forest. Do you really want government to be your master?

  • DVious

    6 reasons Ron Paul is electable, 2 reasons that he isn’t:
    #1 The Huffington Post endorses him.
    #2 Even though it shouldn’t be a reason to elect or not elect somebody, does anyone really believe Ron Paul will be able to go against someone as articulate and youthfully charismatic as Obama, when Ron Paul comes off “dry as dust”?

  • Bud MacGuire

    Boy, o boy! the Israeli lobby is now out in force to sink Ron Paul, and they don’t hesitate to tell out and out lies to try to stop him, because they know that after Ron becomes president America is going to announce a long period of peace to avoid the encroaching bankruptsy that only he has a plan to defeat. And Israel then will be obliged to take up her own defence.
    These critics of Ron Paul are no friends of America

  • http://www.steinbergblog.com Larry Steinberg

    Exactly how is Paul electable? His racist newsletters and anti-Israel positions alone mean he would have to win almost all the white vote, and enough of them will be alienated when his belief that George Bush was behind 9/11, as reported by former members of his own staff, comes out. Not to mention how many conservatives will want someone who thinks it is ok for Iran to have nukes to be POTUS.

    • Frank

      Don’t listen to MSM talking points. Ron Paul is neither racist nor anti-Israel. He’s not a “Truther”, but he won’t trash them.

      If the PM of Israel & head of the Mossad think that a nuclear Iran poses no existential threat to Israel & that they could handle Iran on their own, why should we think we can’t also?

      • Pepper

        Because we are a bunch of good Paul-hating folk who get all our information from that best of all sources, our rectum! And talk radio.

        And Ron Paul is a lowlife anti-American pile of offal, a traitor who should be strung up for daring to say the government should obey its own laws. And you should be strung up for daring to question us.

        (wow, that was a painful exercise. I don’t see how they do it. Especially Millicent.)

        • Ann in Nebraska

          Ah, yes, Millicent. She needs a big chill pill. And a nap.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001509763914 Gary Workman

            And some Depends

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      LARRY, YOU ARE EXACTLY RIGHT, HE DID SAY BUSH WAS BEHIND 911, ANTI ISRAEL…WE DO NOT NEED HIM AS OUR NOMINATION LET ALONE PRESIDENT OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY..HE IS TOO FAR TO THE LEFT AS FAR AS I AM CONCERN…WE HAD ENOUGH PROBLEMS IN THE PAST 3 YEARS, WE DO NOT WANT A NUT JOB RUNNING OUR COUNTRY FOR 4 YEARS…THESE ARE NOT LIES , ALL THIS CAME OUT OF HIS OWN MOUTH HOW HE WILL RUN THE COUNTRY & HIS WAY OUT BELIEFS !

  • steve

    Like a lot of conservatives I liked an awful lot of what Dr. Paul has to say about Constitution respecting government doing away with the Patriot act(a blueprint for a dictatorship) I believe we should audit the Fed end the hated income tax and abolish America’s gestapo the IRS. I hesitated because I was nervous about his foreign policy ideas. Recently he addressed the “Ron Paul is a kook” sentiment as follows: “They call me kooky We went into Iraq a country that did not attack us and have set up a shiite regime which will after we have expended so much of our blood and treasure will ally with Iran. Now that is kooky.” Enough said RON PAUL 2012

  • whatsmyname

    I am a republican, my entire family is republican, proud of it ! I really wonder if all of you Dr. Ron Paul supporters are for real? Because he is putting his son in a bad position if he loses, did you ever think of that? Also, I heard if Dr. Ron Paul , would have to give up his run for president, it is assumed that he would have all of his LIBERTARIAN, supporters, back , Gary Johnson [libertarian] New Mexico. I would like to know Dr. Ron Pauls, expertise, on the Obama adm. and Clinton’s , as to why our 4 Marines are being charged with a criminal assault . The state of Mississippi, Gov. Barbour , are the ones who should be charged for releasing prisoners who committed murder, not our Marines. Lets hear the Marines side of the story. These 4 marines, should only be charged by the military. Go, home , Obama.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001509763914 Gary Workman

      I’ve been a Republican since Barry Goldwater in 1964. We were not called Libertarians so much back then, it was mostly called “Conservative” or just “Republican”. I’m not sure Barry Goldwater even knew the word “Libertarian”. I can assure you, neoconservatism which is apparently what you subscribe to has little to do with being a conservative. It is an outgrowth from the Democratic Party.

      As far as the 4 Marines, I have no idea what Dr. Paul would say about it, but I will tell you what I think. I think it’s an act beyond stupid and jeopardises every other Marine and soldier and every other American and it does not speak to who we are or represent the values we hold dear. We have a code of conduct and those Marines have been trained and know what that code of conduct is as well as the consequences to them and their fellow Marines. I can assure you the Marines will know how to handle them. Neither Obama nor Ron Paul’s input is needed or warranted.

  • Raymond Thomas

    I am amazed at the number of anti-Ron Paul people on this site. They are good at calling names but do not offer one iota of evidence for any of the bilge they spew out of their mouth’s. They of course are free to think and say what they want, however it just shows their complete ignorance of what Dr. Ron Paul stands for and what he has been doing for over 20 years in congress. Please try and educate yourself by checking the facts, not what the main stream media is pumping out of their lying lips. Just because some establishment dork lies about someone does not make it true. I guess they remember that if a lie is told often enough that some will believe. Well you have proved it. PS I believe that if Ron Paul dies in office it will be because he has been assassinated like other presidents who have gone against the establishment. Wake up and do a little research on your own.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      RAYMOND, YES, WE ARE GOOD AT WHAT WE SAY ABOUT RON PAUL…. YOU SAY WHERE IS OUR PROOF, WELL WHEN THE NUT JOB TELLS ON T V THAT WHEN HE IS PRESIDENT HE WILL DO THIS & THAT, WHAT MORE PROOF DO YOU WANT ???? HE WANTS TO LEGALIZE DRUGS, HIS FOREIGN POLICIES ARE VERY, VERY SCARY, PLUS NUMEROUS OTHER SCARY BELIEFS HE HAS & COMMENTED IN HIS DEBATES ! DOES YOUR COMMENTS CLASSIFY LIES { WHEN YOU TELL LIES OFTEN ENOUGH, PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE IT } ALSO OR IS IT JUST THE ONES THAT ARE AGAINST RON PAUL ?? GET REAL, THIS IS AMERICA, FREEDOM OF SPEECH & OUR CHOICE OF A PRESIDENT ! IT WILL NOT BE RON PAUL ! AMEN !

  • http://www.awakeningasleepinggiant.com Mike Horner

    Can you just imagine this skinny, whiny high-pitched voiced old man trying to stand on the same stage with a young, handsome Obama. The worst thing about Paul is that he is a “Truther”, believing we are responsible for the 9/11 attacks, which makes my blood boil. If he were to win the nomination I would vote for Obama, believing that Republicans must be totally nuts, and, after the previous nominations of Bob Dole and John McCain I’m not that far off the mark!

  • Drop Dead Fred

    The only thing that determins if a lawfully eligable candidate electable is wether or not people vote for them. I would much rather take my chances with an honorable man such as Ron Paul then with any one of those other lying jackels running for president.
    If you honestly believe for one second that Mitt fromthe land of taxachussets and the big pig isn’t going to butt f**k you with higher taxes and play to lobbyists intrests then you are not only sadly mistaken but deluded.
    Mitt is there for three reasons. To fulfill his personal liberal agenda, put more money and power in his pocket and finally ego.
    None of these reasons truely benifit our country.

  • Richard Kahn

    @Sage, I noticed that there does not appear to be the “six reasons”. I expected a list. I still plan to vote for him, though. The arguments [still] attacking his foreign policy simply regurgitate the fear-mongering, especially in the context of Iran. So how come all-of-a-sudden we are not afraid of any of the other communist countries that have the bomb?

    @Elwood, if you are that old and cite age as a reason to not vote for Ron Paul, do you remember what Ronald Reagan said when Walter Mondale tried to make age an issue? “Some people want to make age an issue in this campaign. I for one refuse to comment on my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”

    • Radman

      “So how come all-of-a-sudden we are not afraid of any of the other communist countries that have the bomb?”
      To answer your question, Richard, it’s because the other nuclear (and Communist) nations you mentioned are not controlled by radical Islamists, indoctrinated from childhood with the belief that their only true reward will come in the afterlife via suicidal jihad in the name of Allah.

    • Ann in Nebraska

      Richard Kahn, I had forgotten what Reagan had said about age. Thanks for reminding me. It’s still funny today. Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Terry Black

    News Articles to Search Today: How To Get Ron Paul Elected

    And:

    Ron Paul Receiving Game Changing Endorsement From South Carolina Senator

  • Duane Grindstaff

    Those who dislike Ron Paul must have hated President Eisenhower. Eisenhower tried to warn us aabout the military-industrial complex, Ron Paul is the only candidate to stand up to the military-industrialists & the bankers, who profit from a permanent state of war. All other candidates, including Obama are just puppets of those, who profit from war. Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate electable against Obama because he is the only candidate, who would offer real change from what Obama is already giving us. Those, who think that we Ron Paul supporters are a bunch of “Nut Jobs” must actually really love Obama because they want to continue the status quo – permanent war, with the disappearance of the middle class, and a constant move to totalitarian government.

  • e perase

    Following the logic of this post, Ron Paul can only try for the Presidency in a 3rd Party.

    However, we have good reasons to believe that even though “Ron Paul has all the psychological make-up of a politician that if he doesn’t get his way” he would have no qualms of running in a third party, that this time he won’t, and he can’t either.

    Our case is presented in the piece “Ron Paul Is No Titan Saturn – No Third Party Run” (Here)
    Our premise is uncontestable.

  • https://www.facebook.com/groups/PatriotsUnitedAgainstObamaPropaganda/ Ernest O’Dell

    Go figure: Laura Trice writing for the Huffington Post. Does that sound like a conservative writer on a conservative blog? No. You Paulbot pinheads just got punked by another Liberal on a libturd blog.

  • Justwhistlingdixie

    Question’s for all of the few who despise Ron Paul.
    You hate his opposition to the war on drugs. Q: How is that war going, are you winning it. How much of your taxes are being wasted. How many liberties has it cost you so far. How many illegal immigrant drug dealers are now in the country. When do think you will win that war, or is it like the war on terrorism, it will never end, but, will ultimately destroy America.

  • Mundus Vult Decepi

    RON PAUL 2012!!!

    • AlleyOops

      The author of this article must be the guy that heads up the Patriot’s ‘organization’ in South Carolina. Ron Paul is old and worn out and it shows. He had to crawl back to TX to rest up a few days before he could continue his campaign. He was so travel and campaign beaten that he couldn’t attend the debates in Charleston, SC. The debates were much better without the shrill voice of Ron Paul echoing thru the auditorium. I find it odd that the majority of his supporters are 30 years old and younger. Perhaps his wanting to legalize drugs gives the groupies cause to support Paul. It would be a shame to see Romney get the nomination by default; Santorum, Paul, Gingrich and Perry are dividing the conservative vote which just might let Willard get the nomination thru the back door.

  • know better

    Go Paul ! Your the only true American that is running for president.The rest are a bunch of anti-gun jacka-s’s that are out for themselves and ANY of you that can’t see that are insane.Ron can and will beat obutthead ! God Bless.

  • Flag lover

    Thanks Ron W,you said what my heart has been telling me. I think that some of you people are idiots,OUR COUNTRY is at stake here and you are telling lies like a little school girl.Well like I have said MANY TIMES before dont waste your time on Idiots and get to work Ron Paul voters,we have work to do to save our country from these types.The 14 amendment we need to do some work on.Many of the things that Ron Paul is trying to do for us is Really good for our country anyone who thinks not is either a Lib or Communist or both or worse.GOD will sort them out later,We should ignore them that makes them more mad.Arguing with Idiots a waste of time.Get your friends organized,show them Ron Paul Videos and invite them to coffee and talk to them about whats wrong with the country ,show them the FACTS they are out there please get organized get them awake so many people rep and democrates are still sleeping.Dont waste your time blogging these people gather the comments that themselves make and call it racist,crazy,or what ever they want it to be and call us Ron Paul supporters when they are BO supporters,These types are in every place to blog about politics,SO DONT WASTE YOUR TIME YOU HAVE WORK TO DO .If these sites dont get visited by true Ron Paul supporters then they will have no one to point a finger at or argue with .

  • ALPHAOMEGA

    RON W. We understand your frustration & concern for our country to survive the SOCIALIST
    president who sneaked in while AMERICA was sleeping, as in 1913 & 1933. Our constitutional
    guranteed freedoms are at great risk because this country elected this puppet of the CITY OF
    LONDON, and his Handler, GEORGE SOROS. These trillionaire TITANS also engineered the
    debacles of 1913 & 1933. I am 88 years old, an ardent observer & student of history. WWII &
    Korea Air Force vet. I visited DACHAU & viewed the HOLOCAUST evidence first hand. Hitler
    called a National Emergency, secured the allegience of the Military, and his private forces, out-
    lawed elections. The dicator was born. The internment camps were opened. The Jews & all
    protestors were the initial scapegoats. OBAMA has as his catalyst only the provacation of a
    “Reichstag fire

  • ALPHAOMEGA

    RON W. We understand your frustration & concern for our country to survive the SOCIALIST
    president who sneaked in while AMERICA was sleeping, as in 1913 & 1933. Our constitutional
    guranteed freedoms are at great risk because this country elected this puppet of the CITY OF
    LONDON, and his Handler, GEORGE SOROS. These trillionaire TITANS also engineered the
    debacles of 1913 & 1933. I am 88 years old, an ardent observer & student of history. WWII &
    Korea Air Force vet. I visited DACHAU & viewed the HOLOCAUST evidence first hand. Hitler
    called a National Emergency, secured the allegience of the Military, and his private forces, out-
    lawed elections. The dicator was born. The internment camps were opened. The Jews & all
    protestors were the initial scapegoats. OBAMA has as his catalyst only the provacation of a
    “Reichstag fire

  • Gordon

    Five big reasons why NOT to vote for Paul: The Russian press and Iran are backing his campaign!! go to http://www.redstate.com for details. 2) His age 3) only one bill passed in 20 some years so how would he be able to magically at this point start performing according to campaign promises 4) He is an isolationist from a national defense stand point and would allow Iran to develop nukes and/or launch an EMP 5) if no 4 happens, all else is a mute point! There are many more reasons why one should not vote for Paul. Come on posters feel free to add to the list.

  • Danee Lee

    HERE IS SOMETHING FOR YOU TO READTHAT MAY SAVE YOUR WAY OF LIFE!
    Ok Let me sun it up for you Ron Paul Haters
    I’m retired with nothing to do but research and I have spent the past four years researching Obama, and the other candidates who have been running for office.

    Yes ever since Obama came on the scene I spent nearly every day checking out his and all the other candidates’ backgrounds, voting records, political views, income, donations
    And much more… I got my information from credible agencies and government websites that have public records and facts and other sources. Not biased news agencies or TV stations or his enemies.

    You are either brain washed media morons or Democrats that just don’t get it yet or maybe you are wanna be socialists. What I find most of the time is that people who put this man down are getting their info from someone else who really hates Paul and democracy. Atheists, enemies of America and Christianity.

    This is a warning for all of you because you are hurting our countries only chance for honest democracy. This man is the only candidate not in the pocket of the rich and powerful.

    You need to stop discriminating against the older generation. Your all gonna be there soon enough. He has the wisdom much like another old geezer who was the best president ever. Ron Reagan.

    I’m not trying to put anybody down just trying to set the record straight. Whoever wrote the article above is right on but there is so much more they should be saying that they have not even touched on about the American Patriot Ron Paul. If you can’t see that he is the most intelligent man at any debate you are blocking it out.

    What I have found in all my research is that everyone has skeletons in the closet except Paul
    He is honest, intelligent, pro American, pro constitution, pro Christianity, and an air force veteran that answered the countries call when he was called. Paul got most of his donations so far from the military. His voting record proves his love for the American way and the media hates him because it is owned by the left or the rich and powerful.

    Folks there is something more important than your candidate working here and that is that our enemies are financing the take down of America and all the candidates but Paul are on the take. I encourage you to look at their voting records and read some of the bills they are voting for which are all part of public record.

    America is about to be swallowed up by our enemies who are all part of the UN and the One world order along with China and Russia. They are all making us weak and spreading us thin all over the world with our military/ Please wake up and vote for the constitution with Ron Paul.

    He has been around Washington for a long time and knows where to start to end the corruption of America.

    He will need a lot of protection because I fear they will attempt to destroy him or kill him if he starts getting stronger at the polls or is the GOP choice against Obama. Yes he will beat him with America behind him.
    No other candidate is as honest or willing to say no to all the big money that has been laid at their feet by the NOW.

    Good luck America, and above all else do your homework. Don’t vote in this election by hearsay, it’s way too important to all of us American patriots. If you think things are bad now, wait until the war starts in Iran and wait until unemployment gets to 50%.

    Black, Caucasian, Asian, Spanish whatever, we are all in this together, if we continue to let big money run our lives through the media we are doomed to destruction and communistic rule. A good rule of thumb is don’t vote for the candidate who raises the most money. He has to pay it back somehow. It’s just common sense.

    It’s coming folks I promise!!! Get ready or vote for Ron Paul….

    • Ann in Nebraska

      Danee Lee, sounds like you’ve been doing what I’ve been doing. I’m retired also and after doing a lot of research on the candidates, I have come to the logical conclusion that Ron Paul is the one who can beat Obama. One of my most enlightening findings: Ron Paul will take no federal retirement pension when he leaves Congress. That is very telling about him. He’s not in this for fame and glory. He is a citizen serving in the House of Representatives, just as the founding fathers wanted the citizenry to do. He left Congress once to return to his medical practice, and then came back to Congress. Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Alice Smith

    Dear Conservative Byte,

    I’m subscribed to your newsletter. Somewhere around 2 or 3 weeks ago, I was ready to unsubscribe, in disgust, over what I saw as, more than one (can’t remember, now), Ron Paul bashing articles. Within the last couple of news emails, I noticed a change with more positive articles about Ron Paul. Thank you, I appreciate that.

    I am not some wild eyed kid, I’m over the half century mark with gray hair on my head. That said, I learned in the early 90s how conservatives have been betrayed with the standard bunch of so called ‘conservative’ talking heads on the main stream media. I still remember old Rush proclaiming how grand NAFTA was with only a handful of real conservatives sounding the alarm. We now have the proof of how old Rush is nothing but a phony conservative, same as the rest of the bunch. FWIW, I haven’t listened to Rush since about 93 when it dawned on me that he was nothing but a phony. Neither do I listen to the rest of the phony ‘conservative’ talking heads. I see them as not only traitors, but bought and paid for media whores.

    Back in the early 90s, I started watching voting records to tell me the truth about any politician. I’ve been watching Ron Paul for around 15 years. One thing I can count on is his consistency on upholding his oath of office and supporting the Constitution. This is all that I ask for with any politician. I want them to uphold the Constitution with their votes. Sadly, the majority of the time Ron Paul warnings have fell on deaf ears with his fellow politicians voting to trample on the Constitution.

    We now see the fruit, of the successful manipulation tactic of, ‘voting for the lessor of two evils’. We have a House and Senate that’s the best money can buy. It’s full of political whores that have no loyalty to this country or the Constitution. Their votes PROVE who they are and what they are. The direct results of this voting has brought our country to its knees and we’re like a ship sinking fast. I’m encouraged because conservatives seem to be waking up out of their slumber and realizing they’ve been manipulated.

    I would like to challenge all, check the voting records of ALL of those running in this race. Use the Constitution as your yardstick. You will discover that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that has consistently voted based on the Constitution.

  • John G.

    Coming from the Huffington Post, I can understand where they are coming from. They would love to have Paul as the Republican nominee. Obama would chew him up and spit him out. The same people who voted for Obama as a protest are the same ones supporting Ron Paul. One would think that they learned their lesson but I don’t think they did. Ron Paul is an old fool. He’s been a bubble or two off center from the day he was first elected to the Texas Legislature. Things haven’t changed. Anyone with half a brain and one eye could see Ron Paul for what he is, a cantankerous old man. If you listen to his ideas, some make sense, but he goes way overboard with them. I’d love to see several agencies/departments done away with and they can start with the EPA, Energy, Education, and Commerce. They could (should) elilminate all foreign aid unless the country can PROVE that it’s necessary. Like Rick Perry said, “start with zero.” Then let them argue their case. Ron Paul is misguided in his zeal and would be another Obama, a person with no experience.

  • Optimistic Dreamer

    Reading these comments has simply, scared me to death. Granted, most are intelligent, well thought out and have legitimacy, even though there are such opposing views. However, it just serves as a reminder that people who believe that Ron Paul can and will, not only get elected, but, succeed in changing things…..will unfortunately, never be able to convince the masses of this theory, whether factual, or not. Remember, who are the masses. Well, going back about 50 years, these were the gullible Americans who thought that as along as we continued to help the rest of the world, we would be loved and appreciated for it. The masses were also the ones who began to eat fast food and junk food and pay a few pennies less for mediocrity, wherever they could find it. These were the masses who were ready to kill anyone who opposed the Vietnam war, or, even had hair below the neckline. These are the masses who allowed Richard Nixon and every president since, help every corrupt administration to bring Rome to its current collapse. The masses? Well, these masses now are even more gullible. They are even more in favor of asking that question, Ask not what I can do for my country, but, what can THIS country do for me. And, I stress the word THIS, instead of the work, MY. In theory, Ron Paul and his Libertarian views are only a reflection of what our founding fathers based the creation of the USA on, nothing more and nothing less. Why Americans are now forced to settle for so much less and something that is disintegrating faster than you can say, “Maybe, when you look at the whole picture, Obama is still the best choice…..” If this is true, or, this most blatant of all liars is to continue to dictate his rhetoric to us, for the next four years, then, my friends….whether opponents or patriots, the only truth is, that, as Yogi used to say, “The Game ain’t over, until it’s over!” But, at that point, even Yogi would admit that the game indeed has ended. Everybody please, no matter how, let’s just get rid of this current evil that exists and continues to destroy America and let’s worry about the other candidates, afterwards, if we are successful enough to have that chance.

  • MSGT JOHN CORREA

    This message is directed at ‘Millicent’ who critized Dr. Ron Paul without listing the “vile things he has said and done?”

    ‘Millicent,’ I can fill six pages of Dr. Ron Paul’s achievements both in private practice and in the House of Congress. Dr. Ron Paul and I know the meaning of the word ‘patriotism;’ do you? And we both honor the principles of the Oath of Office. I doubt if you have ever taken the Oath of the Boy Scouts of America. I did!

    Out of curiosity; what have you ever done for your country?

    P.S. Don’t forget to list the “vile things he has said and done.”

    MSGT JOHN CORREA
    USAF (RET)

  • ALPHAOMEGA

    OOPS, “Reichstag fire”. (How about Iran as the provocation to declare MARTIAL LAW, AND
    USHER IN OBAMA AS DICTATOR ). With the recent DEFENCE bill passage, all is set in
    place for OBAMA to take over. FEMA, HOME SECURITY, & other government secret agencies have the internment camps built & ready. With the stroke of a pen the COMMANDER IN
    CHIEF can do it. We may not have an election in NOV 2012. This should cause all of us to
    start trembling with fright. Can’t understand the Jewish people voting the Democrat Social
    ticket as they will be among the first internees as they were in Germany. The BIBLE states
    ” The Jews will be an astonishment & fuel for the furnaces thruout history”.

  • Danee Lee

    TO EVERYONE ON HERE WHO IS VOTING FOR RON PAUL

    I would like to encourage you that we need to ban together and every chance each of us get
    You send your comments to every Democratic, Republican and Independent BLOG or discussion group. Let’s start an avalanche of positive truthful information about the peoples only true candidate. This means that you should subscribe to every single political website as possible and let the entire world know we are taking America back through Ron Paul.
    Not only are we voting for him, we are also voting for all new Republicans, Democrats and Independents in the house senate and then we can start working on the judicial branch of government. WE ARE TAKING BACK AMERICA FOR OUR KIDS AND GRAND KIDS…
    CHARGE!

    • Joyce

      You are mistaken..Ron Paul wants to put everyone on drugs. Can you imagine our Senate, and Congress smoking weed, and voting on things that our very lives depend on?
      We already have had enough of this stupidity. Can you imagine our police or military forces high, and running around with pistols drawn? WAKE UP AMERICA! This is a ploy to get Obummer reelected. We are now lost, but WE have a chance. Go to the polls and vote, but PLEASE not for Ron Paul.

      • donald

        Where in the world did you get this, Joyce? I don’t care for Paul but this sort of thing goes beyond the pale. Same kind of stuff a liberal democrat would fabricate!

        • Joyce

          I will remind our readers that there are TWO Joyces and a Joyce Ann writing in this blog. The above Joyce is not me.

          • donald

            You’re not you?

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        JOYCE, I THINK A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE ON THIS WEBSITE ARE DEMOCRATS…I HAVE READ EVERY ARTICLE & IT IS ALL ABOUT RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT. A FAR CRY FROM WHAT I HAVE READ , OBSERVED & HEARD…YOU SEE ,THE DEMOCRATS WANT RON PAUL TO BE NOMINATED BECAUSE THEY KNOW OBAMA WILL BEAT HIM TO A PULP… WAKE UP AMERICA, DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AS IN 08 , DO NOT LISTEN TO A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE ON SITES LIKE THIS…BE VIGILANT…GOD BLESS !

      • MSGT JOHN CORREA

        Joyce, I really don’t believe you have any real knowledge about Dr. Ron Paul or you wouldn’t be expressing yourself with such hatred in your heart. I really think you should see a therapist to help you conduct some form of research before you criticize a person you know absolutely nothing about. I’m not criticizing you, I’m only suggesting a recommendation for you to see a therapist. So please don’t think of me as being unkind.

        MSGT JOHN CORREA
        USAF (RET)

  • Nannyroo

    Are you people not aware of what the Holy Bible says about the nation of Israel? Pray blessings upon Israel….You had better be careful for what you ask. Ron Paul is good fiscally but socially he is a nightmare. How can we ask for Gods help when we need it if we don’t support the apple of his eye? That will be might bad when you don’t have much of a defense and military system.

    • Al

      At Nannyroo;

      I can see how you may be confused on this topic considering how the mainstream media has tried to twist the message. So to be clear, Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel Agrees with US Congressman Ron Paul on his foreign policy concerning Israel. Poking at the apple of Gods eye with flawed policies surly isn’t going to win us any favors and that’s exactly what the other establishment candidates are pursuing.

      Ron Paul 2012!!!

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        AL, I FOR ONE DID NOT HEAR IT ONLY FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA …READY FOR THIS ? WE HEARD IT FROM RON PAUL’S OWN MOUTH… SO THIS IS THE TRUE FACT…WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN, THAT YOU SEEM TO KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT PAUL THAT YOU DID NOT KNOW THIS…IF YOU DID & YOU STILL WILL VOTE FOR HIM THEN I JUST WONDER WHO YOU ARE & WHY WOULD YOU VOTE FOR HIM, UNLESS YOU ARE A LIBERAL, DEMOCRAT YOURSELF …JUST WONDER ABOUT SOME PEOPLE…THIS LOOKS LIKE THE DEMOCRATS ARE RESTLESS & ARE OUT THERE DOING THEIR UNDERHANDED DEEDS AS IN 08 !

        • Al

          At SQUEAK;

          Everything I stated above is correct. Please provide me with a link showing that Dr. Paul is stating something otherwise.

          Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • DrE

    2008 taught us all that Trust is a number 1 priority. 1. being aware That Media Vetting screwed the American voter in 2008-What will you do about it in 2012.

    All those aware have no Trust in our US governing… Face facts Obama Jr. is neither the American Dream nor the African American Dream. He is a made up Milli Vanilli character. He has no background or Business savvy running the Presidency of the United States. Once off the prompter we all know he is lost lip singing Soros and or Rev Wright tunes, and therefore we are all had dad. 2. a resolve is open up all background data and details of all White House Guest meetings under oath, Mr. Whoever you are and prove that you are not Milli or Vanilli.

  • Ron

    Definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over getting the same results. Time for change. Vote Ron Paul 2012

    “Do not believe it when they say he is not electable. It is a lie.”

    • AuburnV12S

      Then Ron Paul and his minions are insane for trying over and over again, and failing over and over again, to convince sane people to vote for him!

      • Steve

        All the so-called “sane” voters elected politicians who got us into this mess in the first place. The third time may just be the charm for RP.

        The ideas he as articulated will live on and only grow stronger because people will see that he will have implemented policies that actually turn things around or (if not elected) they will see that nothing works but his ideas for more limited government, individual liberties (as opposed to creeping surveillance and loss of privacy), balanced budget, sound money, and a non-interventionist foreign policy such as we had for our entire national history before 1950 (i.e. wars declared only by Congress).

  • off plum

    I will always vote what I have promised, and always vote the Constitution, as well as I will not vote for one single penny that isn’t paid for, because debt is the monster, debt is what’s going to eat us up and that is why our economy is on the brink. Ron Paul

    If you like small government you need to work hard at having a strong national defense that is not so militant. Personal liberty is the purpose of government, to protect liberty -not to run your personal life, not to run the economy, and not to pretend that we can tell the world h

    Another term for preventive war is aggressive war – starting wars because someday somebody might do something to us. That is not part of the American tradition. Ron Paul

    The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people. Ron Paul

    There is nothing wrong with describing Conservatism as protecting the Constitution, protecting all things that limit government. Government is the enemy of liberty. Government should be very restrained. Ron Paul

    • Joyce

      What you Ron Paul supporters don’t get is Ron Paul is NOT a conservative or Republican — he is a LIBERTARIAN pretending to be a Republican (running on the Republican ticket) or conservative. That’s ALL he can understand: Libertarianism, nothing more — by the way, SOME of which I can support.

  • niles

    Why he can’t win….
    He is too short, looks too old, poor speaker, not good looking, and poor debater.
    Too many voters today vote for looks, and slick talk over charterer. It is the rock-star mentality.
    The sad truth is if you don’t look and sound like a celebrity you lose, Romney does. Paul needs to join him as VP. Together they can beat Obama. Isn’t that the most important thing. To end the Obama regime.

  • sensei2004

    Ron Paul’s ideas are looney. Pulling the US out of the UN will not serve any good purpose. The UN did not exist when the Constitution was written, and the world in general has advanced since then. Foreign aid is the only way the US can maintain some influence in otherwaise nasty countries. If it wasn’t for foreign aid Egypt would have become anti-American many years ago.
    Should the GOP be foolish enough to elect Ron Paul America will have another four years of Obama. People should stop bickering about Romney. Arnold has managed to win in California because he was electable. So he was not a staunch Conservative, but what matters in politics is first of all to be in power. And in this particular case it is imperative that Obama be out.
    RP is a looney and the fact that he gets so much attention and diverts GOP votes to unwinnable causes is worrying. Electing Ron Paul would be more of a revolution that electing Obama was. The number of lost jobs on this occasion would be enourmous. Amercia can’t afford teh luxury of another failed experiment in demoocracy.

    • donald

      You’re right sensei2004! If Paul is the nominee chances are high that obama will get another 4 years!

    • Anthony San Diego

      Here we have two opinions, one by sensei2004 and then supportive of that opinion we have Donald. Now we all know that opinions are like… well, you get the idea.

      • donald

        No Anthony, what’s the idea?

        • Are You Serious

          Like A holes, everybody has one.

    • Steve

      I can agree with you that electing Ron Paul would be more of a revolution than the election of Obama, but as to the trajectory of that revolution I have to differ with your conclusions. The vast majority of jobs lost would be in the (taxpayer funded) government sector, freeing vast amounts of private capital to pour into free enterprise ventures which would, in short order, more than compensate for any initial loss. His policies are the only ones that have the potential to forestall/avoid an economic system collapse and a currency collapse such as this nation has never experienced.

      U.S. foreign aid to other nations has been seen by many of the best experts as nothing but a funnel of bribe money to corrupt the rulership of sovereign nations who continued to be enemies of this country regardless. If an equivalent amount of money had been sent via private enterprise to stimulate economies of other nations it would have been many, many times more beneficial for the citizens of those countries and would have resulted in immeasurably more good will across the world.

      Obama’s policies have been anything but an experiment in democracy. He has made himself a virtual dictator, almost unilaterally sending troops into harms way and teaming with NATO to do dirty work in Libya that had nothing to do with our national interest; he appointed dozens of czars who are unaccountable to Congress and now is making federal appointments without any Congressional oversight, spitting on any semblance of balance of powers. He has signed laws such as NDAA that work against the interest of the American people; he has commited trillions in taxpayer funding to bailing out criminal “too big to fail” banks and insurance monopolies. He fought tooth and nail for a healthcare bill that will ruin the quality and availablity of healthcare, lying that it would reduce the deficit (by adding new taxes to the language of the bill).

      Ron Paul would reverse these trends, which threaten to undo the finanical stability of this country to the point that we will move into third world status within the decade. Now THAT is a revolution I can, and will, support!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      SENSEI, RIGHT ON…I AGREE!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      SENSEI, I WATCHED THE DEBATE TONIGHT & THE MORE I HEAR PAUL TALK THE MORE I THINK THIS MAN IS A DANGEROUS MAN FOR THIS COUNTRY BESIDES THE FACT HE IS A NUTS …. OBAMA WOULD CHEW HIM UP & SPIT HIM OUT IN A DEBATE WITH HIM… I TRULY BELIEVE WE HAVE A LOT OF DEMOCRATS FOR PAUL & MAKING COMMENTS ON THIS PAGE IN DISGUISE… THEY HAVE COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK… THE DEMOCRATS WOULD LOVE TO HAVE PAUL NOMINATED…SO BE CAREFUL ALL YOU PEOPLE !!

  • Wallace Bush

    Bull

  • Wayne

    To the naysayers …I agree that Dr.Paul lives in a place where things are different than the real world BUT selecting Mitt Romney even tho he could very well defeat Obama , would create a whole new set of issues and problems. I think the real issue is not who in the republican side runs..but that we all agree another 4 years of Obama is not an option

  • Enubus

    I assume this is tongue -in-cheek, but if not I am laughing out loud at the blogger’s foolish missive! Ron Paul is a lunatic and at his age probably showing signs of dementia.

    • Are You Serious

      You’ve got that right. He thought Lansing Michigan was a surgical procedure.

  • http://www.wakeupamerica.com/constitutionalbelievers Constitutional Believer

    If You Believe in this statement; “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”Then I ask you, what are you doing to make sure this statement is not thrown out in the trash and made obsolete by the Tyrannical Entities that have become entrenched in our countries local, state and federal public offices? Make Corrections To This Travesty! Make the Difference and Take a Stand with other Good Men and Women.
    Info @ http://www.wakeupamerica.com/constitutionalbelievers Take Care and GOD BLESS!
    Sincerely
    Mr. Harris
    ConstitutionalBelievers@hot.rr.com

  • American Patriot

    You don’t need to donate money to help Ron Paul just a little time and effort….
    Each of you patriots can make a difference…

    I would like to encourage all Paul supporters to jump in and help us get some honesty back in government by sending a donation of whatever you can afford to Ron Pauls website.
    He doesn’t have the wall street bucks or the third world order support (NWO)
    What he does have is compassion for America and our constitution, bring respect back to our Whitehouse, Congress and Senate. Donate to Paul and save your kids future.

    If you want to help Ron Paul without donating money, you can easily help his campaign by contacting this website address and requesting the facts that you can cut and paste into blogs or discussions groups, friends and associates email addresses and more…

    Let’s ban together and take this country back! allhonesty777@hotmail.com

  • robert

    pulling the us out of the un is a perfect idea.and then kicking the un people and dismantling the building.the un trys to dictate us policy to the us.no one should try to dictate policy to the us,but the us.you people have your opinion,i have mine,ron paul is my choice,you people have your choice.everyone i know is voting for ron paul,thats are choice.his age.i know lots of people in there 70,s and 80,s that are very smart,very healthy.so your opinion means absolutely nothing do us.god bless all american veterans and american citizens

  • One of the Last True Patriots

    Well, I find it sad that many of the commenters on here are either brainwashed into believing whatever the biased mainstream media has told them, or are outright uneducated on the policies of Ron Paul. (Many are most likely plants trying to divide the people and hide the truth) Who cares if he is old, most of the politicians in Washington DC are like the crypt keeper from HBO’s Tales from the crypt! The only reason people are calling him crazy or looney is because he does not represent the status quo running the scene in politics, so I guess that is to be expected. Please do the research yourselves, listen to the candidate speak for himself, don’t believe whatever you are told!

  • Scott

    Like I have stated recently. I have never before been a registered voter due to the fact that I know that they are all liers and fraudulent thieves. Now I soon will be a registered voter and will only do a write in vote for Jill Reed and Tom Cary of the TVP party. TVP and the Prime Law will take this country into a higher level than it ever has been. It will be what it was always meant to be. No Republican or Dumbocrat will ever change anything for us. They have everything just like they want it. TVP2012.org

    • Ann in Nebraska

      What on earth have you been smoking, Scott??? Step away from it before you hurt yourself.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      SCOTT, YOU MUST BE OUT OF YOUR MIND…OR AN OBAMA LOVER, BECAUSE WHAT YOU JUST SAID WILL GIVE OBAMA VOTES…WOW, WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOU…EITHER YOU HATE THIS COUNTRY,YOU ARE A STUPID DEMOCRAT OR BRAINWASHED…SORRY, DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT SOME OF YOU PEOPLE ARE SAYING & THINKING… MAYBE YOU NEED TO LIVE IN ANOTHER COUNTRY BECAUSE YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE US AMERICANS SUFFER ALSO BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPID VOTES, ANOTHER 08 ????? GOD HELP US ALL !

  • BP

    All of you morons ho think you need to elect Nitt Romney to the White House should have been living in MASSACHUSETTS when he was here. You would certainly change your mind. He shoved a health care system down our throats no different than Obama’s. He cannot be trusted no way, no how. Romneycare-Buy insurance or pay a penalty on your taxes.

  • Joy Chessher

    Dr Ron Paul 2012!!!!

  • fish

    The morons and uneducated will vote party lines. We need to get back to the constitution or all is lost. Ron Paul will do that. To believe anything else is to fight mental health. The sheeple will not vote for Ron Paul they do not know the constitution or what this country is all about. They just want their freebies and handouts. The others are bought and payed for by the illuminati (cental bankers). If you believe this wrong, then your the one with the problem(the socialist traitors).

  • Buck

    If not RON PAUL then who ? Look at all their voting records , including RON PAULS , see who voted for what as well as who voted against what . RON PAUL is the last best chance we have to save this country from the progressive agenda . He may be old , but like Ronald Reagan I’m sure he won’t hold that against his opponents , furthermore I am sure he will pick a VP that will continue his policies . I would like to see him pick his own son Rand PAUL as his running mate , I believe it would be the first time we will have had a father / son team leading our country , it might prove very interesting because I would vote for Rand Paul in a flash . The only reason he is not in this race was out of respect for his father , how often do we see that today . RON PAUL for PRESIDENT !!!

  • Bokassa Kentucky

    A Ron Paul/Allen West ticket sounds great to me.
    I’m not in the least bit worried about Ron Paul’s age, especially if he has a top quality running mate like West or Rubio.
    I sincerely hope that Obama manages to serve out prior to being removed from office via impeachment or other because his VP is a total plagiarizing idiot who has been caught dead handed in numerous lies.
    If Obama decides to dump Biden for Hillary that would be even worst then the Biden thing. She may be a bigger fraud then Biden. Oh I forgot she landed under hostile fire in Iraq ….didn’t she. What a crock of crap they try to pedal on us.

  • CW

    I hate to even say this but with the ones we have running and with all the money behind Obama afraid we are stuck with him.

  • FedUp

    I don’t know about anyone else, but if Arianna is hawking it (him), I’m nervous.

  • A. Rollins

    Even Ron Paul knows that he will not be elected President.
    As soon as I can find a way to cancel my subscription to your nut house publicationI will do so.

  • Matt from Florida

    All these puppets on here talking trash about Ron Paul need to get a life. Any sane person, with half a brain, who takes two seconds to listen to the man speak, will know two things. One, he is right, and two he is honest. You’ve been brainwashed by the plugin drug box sittin in your living rooms! Obama ran on bringing troops home. He won. Bush ran on small government, with no nation building. He won. Yet, Ron Paul gets attacked for having the same policies. Why? Because they were lying, and their masters knew they it . They also know that Ron Paul isn’t lying. He believes in what he says, and he will do it. Anyone seeking honest info on Paul, don’t pay attention to these idiots. Their probably all the same person, trying to sway public opinion with their stupid lies.

  • fred

    Go Ron Paul.

  • whatsmyname

    An Allen West/Ron Paul sounds better to me. My question is this, would Ron Paul back his son, Rand Paul, if he were running for president ? In my opinion, only we know that Ron Paul is good to himself, what about his family ? I am a bit older, and that 88 year old military man, that can do everything, yes he can very slowly. Come on 88 yrs old , thank you for serving your time, I appreciate your comments.
    Harry Reid , close to 85 yrs old
    should retire, he is getting to be a liability, on our time. Pelosi needs to go she is to old for her position, go home Pelosi, growing old, is exactly that, you think the same way, but you cannot physically keep up. Makes you wonder, as you get older, like Ron Paul, you mellow,
    or you relive your youth. There is nothing wrong with that,reliving your youth. I have followed Ron Paul, his campaigning, Gingrich from way back, especially when he was Speaker, that was a different timeline this is a very historical time. Go home Obama, go back to your country.

  • KenBanks

    We have a number of want-a-be’s running for the Republican nomination. When I listen to Romney, Gingrich, and Perry, I hear arrogance. I see passion for the power and prestige for the office. I do not see that passion when they describe how to fix this country’s woes. Paul, on the other hand, has been screaming about our woes and solutions for years. Some people are actually starting to listen to him. His passion is for his country. Some chatter on the web lists Romney and Obama as coming from the same mold. Romney is more like G.W. Bush. The reason that we have a Cheshire cat in the White House, the queen of hearts in the House, the mad hatter in the Senate, and two red rabbits digging deep holes in the Federal Reserve and Treasury is McCain, Bush, Chaney, and Rove. We recognize these people as having done severe damage to our country (and the Republican party). They pushed the independent thinking voter to the left in the 2008 election. A Bush-like Romney or Gingrich now will guarantee that we will have Hillary and gun control in 2016, if our country still exists.

  • David

    Hey Ron Paul supporters, what will you do when he does not get the Republican nomination? Will you be so mad that you would vote for Obumnutz? Because if you want him to go third party, that is EXACTLY what you would be doing. Think about this verrrryyy carefully!!!

    • Are You Serious

      They don’t care. They are stupid !!!!

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        ARE YOU SERIOUS, EITHER THAT OR THEY ARE LIBERAL DEMOCRATS IN DISGUISE…I FEEL IT IS THE LATER !!! I CAN NOT BELIEVE THE TRUE CONSERVATIVE AMERICAN WOULD JEOPARDIZE THIS GREAT COUNTRY BY VOTING THE WAY THEY SAY… WOW, HOW SAD !!!

    • Alden Wayne Dumas

      Hey David, Yes. I will vote Ron Paul in the 3rd party.. Think about this! If you dont vote Ron Paul , It will be your fault Obumnuts is re-elected, No matter Obama/Romney..Obama/Newt…Obama/any other Gop Candidate but Ron Paul You will get more of the same, they sleep in the same BED…Wake UP sonny boy

    • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

      If you can convince me of a legitimate difference that makes Establishment Puppet (R) better than Establishment Puppet (D) then I would consider it.

    • AuburnV12S

      Ron Paul supporters keep repeating the Big Lie that there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans. Those “Paul-estinians” remind me of George “Segregtion forever” Wallace who said the same thing in the 1960s because he was upset that more Democrats had finally joined most Republicans in opposing racial segregation and discrimination.

  • Travis

    B.S.!!

  • JJM

    I want someone who will protect my Freedom and Liberty as outlined in the Constitution. Ron Paul is the consistent Constitutionalist and I believe the only one who will continue to fight for what our founding fathers established. The others are more likely to sell us out or be threatened off. And who else has a radical plan to cut our expenses? The federal government is supposed to have limited powers, primarily for national defense and personal liberties, not to control every aspect of our lives. Continue down the road we are on and “1984″ will soon be here.

  • Bill

    Ron Paul is a friggin idiot!!

    • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

      Yeah that must be why he has correctly predicted every economic and political calamity that has befallen us in recent years.

  • Nanette

    I have been following all the debates and every candidate are able to send their information to me via my e-mail. Number 1, in our country the best person to be the best President is not necessarily those who run on any side! It takes BIG bucks! How long has Ron Paul served in the senate??? Term limits, huh! I can not agree with several very important key issues, one being foreign affairs! Federalism worked real well in the 1700′s I am not sure with the “world getting smaller” if this view is applicable or achievable in this day and age. It is not nor would it be as easy as Ron Paul makes it “sound” to implement his ideals. Those who are ‘So Ron Paul” for President, remind me of those who followed Obama. THIS election year is going to determine if we as a country are going to be the “late Great America” I do not believe he can stand up to the test!

    • AuburnV12S

      Actually, Ron Paul has been in the House of Representatives, but you do have it right. Ron Paul is a walking advertisement for term limits.

  • AuburnV12S

    Huffington Post?! GIMME A BREAK! What a classic case of liberals trolling for Ron Paul! BTW, did you know that Ron Paul wastes taxpayer money by flying first class on airlines? If he weren’t such a hypocrite, he oughta fly Southwest!

  • AuburnV12S

    Ron Paul and his supporters are toxic hybrids of Neville Chamberlain, Saul Alinsky, Perez Hilton, and MAObama himself. They attack our friends and kiss up to our enemies.

  • dj

    I hope everyone has a farm so they can grow their own crops and raise their own livestock like the people had back in the days when the Constitution was written by our Founding Fathers did. Some of my ancestors were of the men that signed that paper. That is where Paul wants to take us back to. I am sorry to say but it won’t work in the days of today. Most live and work in cities. Only a few can grow their own today. The world is smaller and our ways are different. Most families have mom and dad both working to pay the bills. Under Paul only the rich would be able to put the old people in rest homes to be taken care of.

    Most young people would have to take care of their sick grandparents under Paul as the medicare would not be there to cover them. Inf act no social security or anything else for when one needs a helping hand. It will all fall on the backs of the working man if you really wish to go back to the days of our Founding Fathers. The rich will keep on getting richer and the working man will become poorer and poorer as Paul said he would also do away with the minium wage! Think about that for a moment if you will. I then will be able to hire the man or woman that works now at minium wage for fifty cents or a dollar and hour!! Come to think of it I kind of like that idea but then my family would be having to work for the same wouldn’t they? I guess I don’t like that idea at all come to think of it!!

    No, I guess I still think Paul is off his rocker just like I thought people were off their rockers if they wanted Obama to begin with. Those that would vote for Paul are no different than those that voted for Obama. From one extreme to the other!!

    I guess if I am going to vote for a President this year I will have to write one in and it sure won’t be Obama or Paul the two worst possible ones to to ever be elected to even dog-catcher much less the highest office in the land!! I see why so many ask God to help us because we sure don’t seem to have enough sense to help ourself. Looks like we are heading for another disaster to me!!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      DJ, YOU SOUND LIKE A SMART PERSON, I AGREE NO PAUL OR OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT BUT TO WRITE A NAME IN WILL BE A VOTE FOR OBAMA, PLEASE RECONSIDER…I WATCHED THE DEBATE TONIGHT & PAUL IS A NUT CASE & OBAMA WOULD HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH HIM IN A DEBATE … WHAT I WANT IS TO SAVE THIS GREAT COUNTRY, OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR FREEDOM & OUR AMERICAN WAY OF LIVES !! GOD HELP US ALL !!

      • dj

        I am not going to vote just anyone in. To do so would mean that I am agreeing with some things that they stand for that I cannot as a Christian condone. I try to live as much like I think that Jesus would wish me to in all my dealings. I would not be able to look him in the face on judgement day if I was willing to sell my soul just to vote for the lesser of two evils. Maybe others can but not me. My soul is worth more than that to me. Anyone that doesn’t feel that way is not and will not lead our country back from the brink of total destruction. It is sad that a lot of men and wome have no concept of what Jesus said his followers are to be.

        I have prayeose running and there is only one that I feel is one that really loves his Creator and tries to live as Jesus would wish him to do. He is not perfect any more than anyone else is but he is the best one running so if he isn’t elected to be the GOP choice then I will follow what I feel is right.

        I have always put my God first. My family second and my country third. I will continue to do so. So if others wish to do other wise that is their right as I also have those very same rights. They were granted to me by my Creator not by any one sitting in the office of President of the U S A. Those rights that I have has cost many a soldier their lives so I will not stand by and say it doesn’t matter who gets in office just so long as one side wins over the other. It is far more important to stand for what is right EVEN if you loose. It is not about winning so much as how one can live with themselves and how they will one day be judged on what they did.

        • Pepper

          Wow, you have just described Ron Paul, the one guy you steadfastly refuse to support. Please become more informed.

    • Pepper

      You make a completely specious argument. Restoring freedom and obeying the constitution, while having the effect of changing “things” back to how they used to be only changes certain things, i.e. the laws and what people expect the government to do.

      You make the argument that it would also somehow negate all technical advances we’ve made, and we’ll be riding around in horse-drawn buggies and watching TV by candlelight. That’s just nonsense.

      Regarding the value of money, if people are getting paid fifty cents an hour, why should that be a problem if that hour’s wages buys five gallons of gasoline!

  • jim shipley

    Ron Paul is the nearest thing to an honest man there is in Washington.

    • AuburnV12S

      Honest? When he wrangled to insert earmarks for his district in budget bills and then made a show of voting against those budget bills when his vote was not needed for passing the bills?

  • Alden Wayne Dumas

    LMAO, WOW , I’ve read so many idiotic responses here it’s funny…

    No.1 Ron Paul “loves” this country more than any other politician in office.. Believe me. He will protect this country with all his power. Granted he will not fly off half cocked like All the rest of the want-to-be GOP candidates will. After all- The Constitution states, Congress must Declare the Act of War. Not some half baked President who OBEYS the U.N.

    Stop listening to the scare tactics used by the DEMS and the other GOP candidates.
    Your American…..Act like you have some NADS

    Ron Paul in 2012

  • Die Free

    I don’t think Ron is the right person I like santorum. He is better at least I believe he is and I hope he gets the nod.

    • James

      what are Santorums views on the 2nd amendment? Check out how he voted on the Brady bill.

  • Patriot 101

    This link was posted by another earlier, but I’m putting it up again. I watched this and was astonished!
    Watch this link before any of you bash Ron Paul again.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/CollectiveCheckup
    The man is insightful, intelligent and bold in his predictions.
    I’m sure you couldn’t get him to make predictions for 10 yrs out now! It would be too scarry!

  • Rev Jim Williams

    Did you know that Moses was 80 years old when God called him to lead the children of Israel ?
    Did you know that Socrates was 70 when he gave the world his wisest philosophy ?
    Did you know that Michelangelo was still composing poetry and designing structures at age
    89 ?
    Did you know that Bacon was 60 before he wrote his greatest works ?
    Did you know that Alfred Lloyd Tennyson published “Crossing the Bar,” at age 83 ?
    Did you know that Oliver Wendell Homes, was 79 when he wrote, “Over the Teacup.?
    Did you know that George Bernard Shaw wrote some of his most famous plays at age 80.
    Did you know that John Wesley , at age 83 was annoyed that he could only write 15 hours a day without hurting his eyes. And at 86 he was ashamed he could not preach more than 2 times a day. In his diary, he complained that he had an increasing tendency to lie in bed until 5;30 in the morning.

    You check the ages of our oldest Presidents, and see that they were some of our best.

    Old people are not always mentally challenged , they are more likely to be physically challenged. But, we don’t need a President to go out and play basketball with the boys, or play golf with John Boehner.

    I would just hazard a guess, that if a person were to check all previous Presidents, that none of them needed 17 vacations in the first 32 months in office.

    If a President needs that many vacations in 32 months, you tell me, “WHO IS THE WIMP ?”

    • Steve

      Excellent.

  • http://conservitivebytes george morrison…….suffering from a case of RED ASS

    well he certainly has got to be a hell of a bunch better than the current userper in office now,and better yet he ain’t no communist and he was born here unlike the trash that currently resides in the whitehouse,Dr.Paul has some good ideas he is well educated he also has a very good understanding of how the government works and how it is supposed to work,is he electable? I think so and where these other folks carry a lot of undesirable baggage with them Dr.Paul does not seem to have all these problems,I would think he would be sent up higher in the rankings with the choice of a real strong running mate but time will tell,personally I hope he does get the nomination,the rest of those folks just don’t do a damn thing for me

  • Tom T

    Both Rep and Dem are scared of Ron. The last thing that Wall Street wants is peace. Wall Street is nothing more than a war machine, that produces large pay days for Wall Street and big business. Lets give peace a chance.

  • Paul

    Ron Paul wants to restore our freedoms and liberties that have been lost. We don’t need no stinking war with Iran or any nation. One of the people who posted a comment asked “where would we put all those troops returning home?” WE spend billions each year on bases abroad and the one who asked that silly question doesn’t care about spending the money over here and adding jobs over here? The U.S. has missiles that can hit targets hundreds of miles away, and aircraft carriers carrying jet fighter planes in the Atlantic and Pacific, so defending the U.S.A. isn’t a problem in this high-tech age we live in. Ron Paul served in the military unlike Mittens Romney, Newtie Gingrich, Rick Santorum or that idiot we have as current president. It never ceases to amaze me how the majority of people who have never served in the military are the ones who are in favor of war. Ron Paul will eliminate waste in government and abolish the stinking I.R.S.

  • Jack

    Damn I thought there were much smarter people in this country but looking at these replies America has been dumbed down so for I dont know if electing Ron Paul could even save this country.

    • http://www.pepper.net Pepper

      I hope and pray that what you see here isn’t typical but keep in mind Americans always get the government they deserve.

  • Judith

    Ron Paul has more brains in his pinky than most people do in their entire body. This man spends 18 hours a day reading policies and issues to stay abreast of current events. That’s why he can answer questions – unlike that idiot Perry.

    As for him going third party, this country is ripe and ready for someone who will restore our freedoms and not be a puppet for the Globalists.

    • Are You Serious

      Yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  • Roger Cunningham

    Dr. Ron Paul served in the Air Force as a medical doctor with no command responsibilities. Peace-time, state-side doctors are insulated from the true realities of the military culture. Most serve only to gain forgiveness for the extreme costs of medical school. He can’t be faulted for that.

    When he said, however, that Army Private Bradley Manning was a “Hero” for “spilling the beans” to Wiki- leaks, he (Paul) revealed his true ribald reasoning and thought process!

    The “value” of what Manning disclosed isn’t the issue. It’s the fact that he violated his oath…even if it only involved the tire pressure of a Jeep, if it was disclosed in “Secret” papers.

    I held an Army Security Clearance in the Viet Nam era. After an extensive background investigation, I underwent a sternly worded orientation, detailing the responsibilities including “non-disclosure” that I even held such a clearance. It wasn’t to be disclosed to family, friends, and certainly not to casual acquaintences over coffee or a beer!

    Bradley Manning violated his basic oath to the US Army, and a secondary oath to recieve his security clearance. He violated both and belongs in Leavenworth for a good, long time!

    For Ron Paul to support the admitted actions of Bradley Manning lays wide-open the ribald thinking of this avowed Libertarian. He scares me!

    The election of Ron Paul to the Presidency would lead to certain war!

    rc

  • Kem

    I used to think Ron Paul was a nut case until I actually read what the man stood for. I was looking at Michelle Bachman and Rick Santorum but after reading where Ron Paul stood on the issues, I’ve gotta say I’m taking a deeper look at him. I won’t vote for RINO Mitt or hateful Newt so I’m narrowing down my choices.

    • Are You Serious

      Fool!!!

  • http://hotmail Beverly Kaleiohi

    Finally! …Whats the matter w/ the BLAZE comment blog?…..Isn’t it suppose to be the last comment at the top?….Actually I wonder if my comment even gets printed, seeing that it take so long….waiting to see if it shows up.
    No to Ron Paul and Romney…..Oh God I wish some conservative would jump into the race….for sure they would win the election.

  • dj

    Did you have him as your doctor when he was in the military or since then? Do you live in Texas and know people that know him? If not then you don’t really know Ron Paul now do you? He is known as a kook in Texas and that as much as I wish he would move back to the state he came from I don’t wish him to move to DC. I think the country when all is said and done will have enough sense to not send him there either!! Vote for him to be the GOP choice and you will have four more years of Obama. You can take that to the bank. Face it there are more registered democrats than Republicans. It will be the Independents that will have to swing behind the choice and vote to win and in the past most of them seem to have voted democrat. Paul will make it a sure vote for Obama. Paul won’t be able to get those people’s votes.

  • Dudley Smith

    I have to agree with ‘Ron” what we need is a strong man that is not afraid to stand up
    to what the politicians has made our country to be. There are some of us who are ashamed of
    what it has become and agree we need to go back to our ” GRASS ROOTS”
    An old man once told me ” Son don’t get above your up-bringing and you will do fine”

  • http://ConservativeByte Independant Voter

    To those stupid enough to vote for Ron Paul, WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!! The man says Iran should have the right to a Nuke bomb!!!! Ron Paul is a Right wing Liberal NUT JOB!!!!!!!!!!!! I tend to swing to the GOP side of voting, but I will NOT vote for someone who supports America’s enemies in building a Nuke!!!!!!!! And Mitt and Perry both say abortion at any stage of a pregnancy should be protected under federal law!!!!! Both support LATE TERM Abortion!!!!!!
    My vote this time will go to either Sarah Palin as a Write In, or Donald Trump if he runs, as he is the one possible candidate that can bring our country back to it’s greatness!!!!!!! Although I do like Santorum he has very little chance of winning. And Obama, Pelosi, Reed, Hillary Clinton, and the tax cheat Timothy Gietner should all be tried for treason against the United States, according to the Constitution, Article III of Section III states that Treason is described as any Leader or member of congress, who gives money, moral support, or bows to a foreign enemy of the United States has commited Treason against the United States. They have done all of the mentioned, Hillary Clinton has written checks to half of our enemies since she took office, Obama has said “Sorry” too a lot of our enemies for our past with them, Obama also said ” the Talaban are not Terrorists, and that our military are the Terrorists. I say Impeach Obumma and the rest of his cronies, and put Trump in to replace him!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Pepper

      I hope you enjoy being a subject of the empire with a boot on your neck because that’s where we are headed.

  • Paul

    Good grief dj! Do you not know the difference between a liberal and a libeterarian? Libeterarians want individual freedoms and liberties for the people and that the people are responsible for themselves. Liberals want government in your front yard, your back yard, your kitchen, your bedroom, and to tax you and take your hard earned money and give to those who don’t want to work. Libertarians want a strong defense and no intrusion in other nations wars or conflicts. Liberals like neocons don’t care about freedoms and rights and like to use scare tactics to control the people. Liberals like the neocons enact rules and ordinances to “protect” you, after all you are not responsible enough to be safe for you and others around you. Don’t forget to put on your seat belt, make sure your children have their helmets on when they skate board or ride a bicycle. Liberals like neocons love to perputate the perpetrated fraud called income tax. Last but not least, as a Vietnam veteran, I ask “war, what is it good for?” Absolutely nothing!!

    • dj

      I won’t vote for a liberal or a libeterarian! They both are not my kind of people. One gives away everything and the other one is scrooge.

      One thinks he is santa claus and the other is the grinch.

      I want one that has his heart in the right place. Not one that gives out a hand-out to everyone and not one that wants to help no one that is an islationist.

      These two are Obama( santa) and Paul (grinch)!!

      • Pepper

        Libertarian is not scrooge or grinch. Libertarian leaves you free to decide for yourself. You are free to give your money and your time to whatever bleeding heart programs you want.

        What I don’t understand is what disease exactly is it that makes you think it’s ok to have the IRS pick my pocket to do what you should be doing yourself of your own free will.

  • James

    Funny that if you look up George Washington’s stand on where and what America should avoid in order to keep this new found union, you will see Ron Paul is RIGHT ON……

  • Suzanne

    Can someone please tell me how President Paul would get his program through Congress? I fail to see how, even with majorities in both houses, he could get the political class to go along with measures that strip them of their power. I noticed tonight while watching the SC debate that he never addressed this issue. Please, if anyone knows the answer, tell us.

  • niles

    Most in poll think Romney will clinch GOP nomination

    Mitt Romney holds a strong lead nationally in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, with a 2 to 1 advantage over his closest competitors, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
    I don’t have any faith in polls.

  • TracyJayne

    76 years old!!!!!! He’s a good man but he is 76 years old!!!!!!!! He has to go home frequently to rest because he is 76 years old!!!!!!!!!! One broken hip or cold and he will not bounce back because he is 76 years old!!!!!!!!!

  • Julian

    Some of these comments show the liberal media have done their job on those who do not do their own research. A big point is while others are talking about grand 10 billion
    $ cuts (over ten years of course) Paul is talking about cutting ALL unnecessary spending until we get our finances under control, and yes that scares those who only know how to feed at the government trough.

    • dj

      Bull corn!! He scares the heck out of anyone that has any sense. He has been running for years and most people have enough sees to see how he really is. He thinks our enemies can be talked to and they are going to fall in love with us. People have been talking with them for centuries and that hasn’t changed one thing with them. They even kill there own. What would make any sane person think they are going to love you? You are what they hate. Those freedoms that Paul talks about? It’s people that won’t worship as they do! If anyone thinks Paul will be able to keep us safe from those kinds of people then you are using some very heavy street drugs.

      • Gary

        So what would you do about it, continue with war? Because that certainly seems like it is working… NOT.

        All the war is doing is breeding another generation of American-haters.

        Also, you make it sound as if Ron Paul being president will mean America will be defenseless. How so? We will still have the military in our country (where they should be), protecting OUR country, doing their job.

  • Gary

    So what if he is 76? He is in good health, he takes care of himself, I mean, he was a doctor for crying out loud, he knows how to take care of himself!

    Also, keep in mind that there have been bad presidents in America’s past that were much younger than Ron Paul, so age is DEFINITELY not an indicator of how good a president they will be!

    Too many Americans are guilty of age discrimination. Our country treats our older citizens like garbage. While other countries revere their older citizens as wise, we sweep them under the rug, corral them into centers for the elderly and leave them to die quietly.

    If a younger person forgets something, we pass it off as them just being forgetful, but the moment an elderly person doesn’t remember, OH NO THEY HAVE ALZHEIMERS!

    Ron Paul is healthy! Please don’t let his age make you pass him by! As an American you should vote for someone based on how they plan to tackle issues, and NOT by how old they are!

  • anton

    I agree with this article. I believe that mainstream media is clearly working against Ron Paul by misrepresenting his concepts. However, for those who truly listen to him, his words truly do represent class, strength and accountability. I have never had so much pride in a potential candidate who I believe is truly for the people. Giving power back to the states will inspire more free market for states to compete for business and recruitment.

  • ALPHAOMEGA

    Just one min. please. I like Ron Pauls positions. He is a very healthy clean living 76 yr old.
    The reason we have troubles in the Middle East is because we interfere in their soveriegn
    business. We expect them to accept our values & culture. We kill thousands in their home
    countries, & then we expect them to love us. How would you like it if they invaded us &
    killed our children? If we expect PEACE in the future we must bring home all of our foreign based military and let those nations choose their own culture & way of life. Our military
    should be used only to defend our borders when we are threatened. We could certainly deploy
    some on our southern border. We should maintain the highest military expertize & the best
    military deterrant weaponry. Iran is a vile snake, but will back down from their beligerancy.
    They know Israel has nuclear missiles, and the best little defence force in the world. They will
    not push beyond the line in the sand marked by Israel. We don’t need to worry that Obama
    is weak. Israel will take out Iran’s nukes this year. Ron Paul knows this. I have decided to vote
    for our nominee. Lord help us as a nation if we pick our man by his good looks & speech.

  • http://facebook pat

    socialist/communist propaganda,,boy there is alot of it on this conserv site this morning lol..
    all u anti paul fans..if u think its working,,its not lol..keep up the good work though,,more and more of us older generation are taking a harder look at paul because of u..the young folk are already on his agenda..so pretty soon it will be just u morons left for obullcrap

  • WildBill

    Red is Wrong!

  • niles

    No matter how much you like Ron Paul he couldn’t debate Elmer Fudd. Obama would chew him a new arss We need someone to out slick . Obama, He has to be defeated.

  • Sergeant Major – U.S.M.C. – Independent Extreme Far Right Conservative TEApublican

    I will vote for anyone against bore-rock HUSSEIN obummer.
    Ron Paul is not my first choice and Romney is not even on my radar.
    Ron Paul would be a huge “change” for America.

  • Thomas M Petty

    Are these Ron Paul naysayers the same people who backed McCain in 2008? So far the people have had very little to choose from for many years

  • Gloria

    I’m telling you people out there that you BETTER think more than twice who you will vote for!!! This Country of ours is about to come to an end as we know it. Don’t listen to the media about anything! They distort every good thing!! Do your research on all the candidates and check out which one will actually stand up for our Constitution, our rights as a Nation. If you will do this you will find that Ron Paul is the “ONLY” one on our side. It doesn’t matter his age, because with age comes wisdom! So just prove yourself! We have got to stand together on this issue or else our Country is gone ‘FOREVER’!!!! Just PLEASE check out each candidate. I have been researching for a very long time now and to me the only one that is capable is “Ron Paul”!!! I do know that Obama is seriously afraid of him. Just check out your heart first!!!!!

  • Gloria

    Listen, the military people know who to look at! The majority of the military are on Ron Paul’s side. So just think about this and do the proper thing for “America”!!!

  • http://www.allofgraceministries.org Lasaro

    Usually I don’t get involved in these kinds of discussions because as Proverbs says to not answer the fool unless you get to be like him, but as I keep the reading the reasons why not to vote for Ron Paul it shows me where these particular individuals have their head in. It seems to me, if they are professing Christians, they should remember the age of some His servants that he used for the good of His people. As far as I am concerned, his age has nothing to do with it because the Scriptures makes it very clear that God holds our ways and breath in His hand. All of the critics of Ron Paul, even if they are younger than him, may not be here tomorrow while he may live 8 more years as POTUS. No, my friends, what we need to do is pray that God put the man of His choice, and I will say this: The presidents we recently have had are the ones we deserve because as a whole we have left out God out of our lives. God’s Word makes it very clear that He is control of governments, including ours. He put Obama via the elections and the voting system because we deserve it! Amen!!!

    • Are You Serious

      That is just pure BS. This is not God’s world. This world is ruled by Satan. It is up to us to guide ourselves through the many obstacles placed before us by Satan. Currently its obama and the progressive left. If we fail to defeat obama, Satan wins another round in an on-going battle of good vs evil. Evil has the upper hand right now but that will change if obama is defeated in November 2012. I have doubts it can be done.

  • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

    CONSERVATIVE BYTE, YOU NEED TO TELL SOME OF THESE OTHER PEOPLE ON THIS PAGE NOT TO WRITE A BOOK WHEN MAKING A COMMENT…IT IS THE SAME THING OVER & OVER ALSO..WHERE ARE YOU TO MAKE THEM STOP DOING THAT ?? FAVORITISM ?? DEMOCRATS ?? WHAT IS IT ???

  • Washington76

    Here is yet another update on dissent online: EPIC – FOIA Documents Reveal Homeland Security is Monitoring Political Dissent http://epic.org/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-monitoring/

  • Washington76

    Update: On Jan 24th, Congress will vote to pass internet censorship in the Senate, even though the vast majority of Americans are opposed. We need to k i l l the bill – PIPA in the Senate and SOPA in the House – to protect our rights to free speech, privacy, and prosperity.

    Our First Amendment protected right of free speech is now directly under assault by a berserk U.S. Congress and White House. Our voluntary black-out is being done in conjunction with countless other websites to help the public understand the serious dangers in SOPA and related bills awaiting passage in Congress right now.

    SOPA and PIPA are to the First Amendment what the NDAA military detention and trial provisions are to the Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments – allowing for the “bl ack bagging” and “disappearing” of websites on a mere accusation alone. If such laws are enacted, the following may as well be posted by the government when they shut sites down:

    “NOTICE: THIS SITE HAS BEEN DECLARED AN UNLAWFUL BELLIGERENT SITE BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OR ONE OF ITS CORPORATE PARTNERS. THIS SITE HAS BEEN BL A CK BAGGED AND DISAPPEARED IN THE NAME OF NATIONAL SECURITY, AND IS NOW INTERNED IN GITMO.

    Your attempting to access and associate with this site has been noted, your IP address has been recorded, and you too are now being evaluated as a possible candidate for unlawful belligerent designation. Have a nice day.”

    That is the kind of Orwellian world the internet will have become, under SOPA/PIPA or other such nonsense.

    The First Amendment is first for a reason.

    Without it, peaceful redress, correction, and removal of oath breaking officials becomes impossible, leaving you with only the Second Amendment to secure your rights. The internet is our most powerful weapon of free speech, which is exactly why the powers that be want to shut it down. With a free internet, they no longer have a monopoly on the exchange of ideas and the spreading of information, and that scares the hell out of them. So, we can expect them to do all they can to find a way to shut the internet down or to tightly control it.

    Thus, the same “bi-partisan” pack of traitors and useful idiots who passed the NDAA now want to k ill the internet. We must defend it with as much dedication as we would defend our right to bear arms.

    • Are You Serious

      There is nothing we Americans can do to stop it. They want to pass it, they will pass it. Please don’t tell me by writing to our congress person will do any good. They don’t give a flying f.u.c.k what we think or want. We are all useful idiots. I hope and pray for the revolution to begin. The sooner the better as far as I’m concerned. It is all we have left. The upcoming election is a joke!!!!

  • Dave

    Please do not include me in any of your emailings’ if you think I will vote for this broken egotist. Ron Paul may have supporters, but so do athletes and you know where they are located. I would much prefer Gingrich or Santorum to this empty headed “individual” (one person on there own, not associated with any group or ideal that would proper others)

  • Ed

    While I am not firmly in his camp, Dr. Paul’s foreign policy has an element of subtle genius: when the feces hits the propeller, our sons, daughters, husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, and cousins in the US Military will be much more valuable when we really need their help in protecting the Republic from enemies, foreign and domestic, if they are right here on our home soil, rather than half a world away… I’m just sayin’…

  • Terry4031

    RON PAUL IS A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE BUT A SOCIAL LIBERAL!

    I have asked my friend a Ron Paul Supporter, as a professing Christian and believer
    in the Bible how he can support the following based on his Christian faith:

    1. Ron Paul supports the legalization of all recreational drugs! This is an extreme
    LIBERAL position on drugs.

    2. Ron Paul supports GAY MARRIAGE! This is inconsistent with clear statements of
    the Bible!

    3. Ron Paul supports legalization of PROSTITUTION! Clearly contrary to Biblical
    teaching!

    4. Ron Paul blames America for the problems we have with Islam. He doesn’t seem to
    know history that Islam has been killing Christians forever and has a hated that is intense
    for Jews and all who will not convert to Islam. Martyr’s have continued to be highest
    in Muslim nations. Christian or converts from Islam have routinely been killed. In spite
    of this Ron Paul blames America! I don’t think so when a case can clearly be shown that
    America has been unselfish in dealings with these folks and there are many historical
    records confirming that that in his ramblings he misses.
    The above are not consistent with the Bible, the Constitution since they are against
    “nature God” and His clear teaching. Ron Paul wants to legalize sin and cast aside
    Judeo Christian morality which comes from Biblical law. As Dr. Karl Menninger advised in the 50′s there was an effort back than clinicalize sin and make it more acceptable and he
    wrote a book warning about this called, “What ever Happened to Sin? Dr. Menninger
    sin has now been pronounced legal by our society and God and His word irrelevant! The
    trend in the U.S. is down and Barack Obama is an indicator of that and now the
    Republican Party has Ron Paul who is right on fiscal issues but departs from the
    Constitutution(which was for a moral people) and the Word of God.

    I will vote for no person Rep. or Dem. who supports the further moral destruction of
    this country. It may be to late already. All you Paul folks ignore the teaching of the
    Word of God on the matters I point out. My friend has never responded with a defense
    regarding his support for Ron Paul and the conflict with the facts of the Bible and History!

  • John W.

    First of all, Paul is not going to drop out or run third party or independent. Insofar as who wins the general election, it wouldn’t matter anyway; almost all of us who support Paul will not vote for “democrat lite” Romney in any case. Those of you who follow the “anyone but Obama” script-which is a prescription for more of the same-need to realize that four years of Romney or four more of Obama will be one and the same, in any substantial sense. Just more seesawing between Republicrats and Demoblicans, as we’ve done for decades now. More war, less security for the nation (no, bombing Iran won’t make us safer), more destruction of what remains of our liberty. Those of you who are convinced by the neocons that we’re on the verge of being invaded by Islamic hordes and living under Sharia law need to stop listening to the snarky bellowing of folks like Mark Levin, and use your own common sense.

  • John W.

    Fascinating-most of those who knock Ron Paul and call him names-never say why they disagree with him or think he’s crazy. They repeat the “talking points” of Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, et. al. Let’s see…..spiraling inflation, more war, indefinite detention, upcoming censorship of the Internet, more and stricter gun control (read, civilian disarmament), more folks in prison than any other developed nation thanks to the “war” on drugs, failing public schools in spite of record funding and federal control. And you call Ron Paul crazy?…..!

    • Jack

      Too true. They’ll just vote for whoever Clear Channel tells them to vote for again. I am sure it will work out this time. “Insanity” is, after all, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. You made bad choices voting for shills who sold out this country. At least be man or women enough to admit it and call out the shills who lied to you before instead of propping up your egos with arguments constructed on grade school playgrounds that rely on name calling. Pathetic.

  • Jack

    Wow. I can’t believe the what passes for logical reasoning by many of the posters here. They clearly aren’t paying attention to the foreign policy nightmare we live under today when they dismiss out of course any opposing view. Every Empire in history has fallen (at least partially) because of their military being overextended and that leading to economic collapse through debt. I guess history isn’t the strong suit of most of this blogs readers.
    I am also puzzled at how so-called conservatives can rail (rightfully) against the idea that the government throwing money at a problem doesn’t fix it…and often times actually exacerbates the problem, yet they think throwing more and more of their children and grandchildren future dollars at the military complex will somehow equate to a better defense. As if the military complex isn’t in and of itself a bureaucracy. It’s completely hypocritical.
    Your party anointed leaders have bankrupted your country and destroyed your military by using them to secure wealth for their crony buddies. A third grader can see this…but grown adults remain in denial. Supporting crooks who steal your money JUST BECAUSE they wrap themselves in the flag while they do it is what is really insane. I want a strong defense and agree with top CIA analysts who have said for years that our nation-building foreign policies are making us less secure as a nation. How many times do you have to be lied in to a war before you start questioning the same liars telling you the newest one is the real one that is important. You’re a bunch of babbling fools who wouldn’t know what conservative ideology was if it bit you in the (you know what). If you are so committed to these wars, than go over there yourself and empty your bank accounts to support them rather than stealing money from future generations and destroying the lives of our young adults to placate your delusional desires. It is immoral to ask others to support your inept thinking with their lives and their treasure.

  • John

    It’s sad to see people who I think really what something different in Washington but won’t vote for someone who would do things different. I think the word is confused.

    Ron Paul would DEFEND America without purposefully OFFENDING other countries. He has no problem going to war based on the Constitutional model which is perfect for what we are going through. He just won’t allow that process to grow the industry of militarism. The MILITARY gives more to Ron Paul and all the other candidates COMBINED. What do they know that the rest of America seems not to comprehend?

    It is time for people to go to Ron Paul’s website(s) and LEARN why he says what he says. How he intends to make peace through trade and how he intends to reduce the government to as small as possible to regain all of our civil/personal liberties.

    It is time. Or maybe you like the gestapo at all of our airports known as the TSA. Maybe you like the government having the power to call anyone who is against big government a terrorist. Maybe you like the government telling you what you MUST buy to be an American which in itself is ANTI-American. Maybe you like bailouts. Maybe you like taxation and redistribution. Maybe you think the Federal Reserve should be allowed to increase the prices of everything you by at the store through the power of the printing press.

    Of course as I stated at the start of this rant … maybe you want something different but then act like a schizophrenic and argue against the person who can bring the right message to DC to fix all of these problems that have grown for the last 100 years.

    Ron Paul has what we need in a president. It is time. It is PAST time!

  • singer23

    Even if I could stand Ron Paul,(I can’t) His supporters would make me say,”AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!

  • Patriot 101

    Can’t stand RP? Get used to more Obummer!
    Only a strong contrast to Obummer can beat him! Someone that is against bailouts, mandated health care participation, lower taxes and less government.
    Romney has pledged Iran won’t get a bomb, so that means bombing, bombing is WAR!
    More war from the leader of the war party!
    End the madness, VOTE RON PAUL!

    • Are You Serious

      BS. He can’t win!!!! Impossible!!!!!

    • Kevin Beck

      How do you figure the Republicans are the war party? They might be co-conspirators, but when you look at the wars since 1900, you get:

      World War I: Started by Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat;
      World War II: Started by Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat;
      Korean War: Started by Harry Truman, a Democrat;
      Vietnam War: Started by John Kennedy and escalated by Lyndon Johnson, both Democrats;
      Persian Gulf “War”: Started by George Bush, a Republican;
      Iraq-Afghanistan War: Started by George W. Bush, a Republican.

      Looks like a 4-2 advantage in favor of the Democrats to me.

  • Sophy

    Wow, Ron W,
    Amen; right you are!!! It was about time for someone with brains and actual knowledge of true, documented facts enlightened some of us……..perhaps you should consider running for public office. [What is your age, btw? lol!]

  • Kevin Beck

    Now we only have to convince the power-brokers in the Republican party Establishment about this. They seem the most impervious to this intelligence.

  • Washington76

    This is Ron Paul’s famous Predictions speech from April 24, 2002. This is the original video compiling recent images and video to give his speech a chilling effect.

    “I have no timetable for these predictions, but just in case, keep them around and look at them in 5-10 years. Let’s hope and pray that I’m wrong on all accounts. If so, I will be very pleased. ” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM&feature=player_embedded

  • Washington76

    This is Ron Paul’s famous Predictions speech from April 24, 2002. This is the original video compiling recent images and video to give his speech a chilling effect.

    “I have no timetable for these predictions, but just in case, keep them around and look at them in 5-10 years. Let’s hope and pray that I’m wrong on all accounts. If so, I will be very pleased. ” Ron Paul

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM&feature=player_embedded

  • Washington76

    Jan 6, 2012 Ron Paul Talks About SOPA And The NDAA Bill At N.H Airport Hanger Rally
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phRi80HBIuU&fe

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1177000219 Jared Myers

    Wow, a good article from the Huffington Post! Who would have thought! :-D Glad to see them give props to Paul.

  • Lola

    6 reasons why Ron Paul will NEVER become nominee nor President…
    1. Not Liberty, just Stupidity
    2. Not Liberty, just Stupidity
    3. Not Liberty, just Stupidity
    4. Not Liberty, just Stupidity
    5. Not Liberty, just Stupidity
    6. Not Liberty, just Stupidity

    enough said.

  • Doran Cooper

    There are many reasons that I can see for voting for Ron Paul. The two main ones, I think, are that he will get us out of the United nations and get the united nations out of the US. I believe that he will reaffirm the 2nd amendment, and that is badly needed. I think that a lot of people just don,t understand his foreign policy. The only thing I don,t agree with is his .wanting to legalize drugs. That is one negative out of number of positives. And wanting to do it doesn,t mean it will get done.

  • JR Patroit

    Ron Paul is the only one in the field for president in either party that is for the CONSTITUTION as written by our great founders. A lot of great, intellegent, brave and true patriots have died for all of the reasons that Ron Paul is standing for now. Uninformed people who do not see the whole picture should not vote. People who do not have a picture ID should not be allowed to vote. There is plenty of time to get one.
    The enemy works off of lie and deception just like 95% of our politicians today. If you want to keep your freedom and America as we know it, RON PAUL is the only answer. I just can't understand why people don't see that all of the others are progressive, one world government, socialists that want to destroy our great country.
    RON Paul has been ignored by the MSM and that should tell you something right there.

  • JR Patroit

    You certainly print plenty of comments that say all kinds of negative propaganda against Ron Paul and a lot of outright lies. At least my comments are truthful. I think you are just against RON PAUL.

  • JR Patroit

    RON PAUL for president 2012, The only honest man running.

  • Sovereign Soul

    Congressman, Dr. Ron Paul IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE who does NOT belong to the Council on Foreign Relations! THE CFR's agenda is the establishment of a New World Order as prophesied and advocated by George H.W. Bush. BOTH the Republican and Democrat party elite … at the very top of the political food chain, are working together to get the Constitutional Republic of America destroyed and made a part of a global government under the United Nations. Ron Paul has a record of consistency and a character of impeccability that none of the others can come close to. Besides that, he has the thlorough and detailed knowledge of how our monetary system works and HOW THE PEOPLE ARE BEING ROBBBED by "the establishment" elite. DON'T listen to the lies about Ron Paul. He's healthy, smart and a TRUE patriot!

  • Sovereign Soul

    Continued: Read The Creature from Jekyll Island to see how this all came about. Just last week, G.H.W. Bush, confined to a wheel chair, and son Jeb met with aka Obama in the White House. For WHAT OTHER reason than deal making and strategy would those TWO be having such a cordial and friendly meeting with THE USURPER? THINK folks! WHY do you suppose BOTH dems and repubs are so visiously attacking Ron Paul?

  • Rich Orr

    To me Ron Paul is the only candidate that ever worked for a living. He has the experience to have felt the human condition and
    to offer a positive alternative. I agree with his plan to balance the federal government. Obama has managed to drive this country
    off the cliff. I support Israel, I abhor the major medical establishment that control and deny common sense treatments and have denied timely treatments to make money. Why has quinine and niacin been removed from the market. Why are stem cells not been employed to treat major illnesses. How about hyperbaric chambers for treating limb ishemia in this country. What kind of a vetting process requires tens of years to approve procedures and medicine and treatment that saves lives, limbs, and minds? I'll leave it to the good Doctor Ron Paul to get us out of the current morass.