If you’ll recall, I and I alone, I believe, El Rushbo long ago predicted to you, or opined that the Occupy Wall Street movement was a creation of the regime’s, because Romney is perceived as Wall Street. They want Romney, and they assume they’re going to be running against Romney, and who could blame them. I mean, if you’re the Obama regime and you take a look conservative media today, you would have to assume that the Republican Party also wants Romney. Okay, it’s inevitable. So you gear up for Romney.
And if you — and Obama’s out in Osawatomie, Kansas, today trying to redo Teddy Roosevelt in 2012, trying to expand on this whole class welfare business. If you’re gonna run against the 1% and the 1% equals Wall Street you need a candidate that you can tie to Wall Street, i.e., Romney. Romney’s out there talking about it. “I’ve been a success in the private sector. I know these things. I’ve built and run businesses. I saved the Olympics. I did all of these things. Bain Capital.” So they got their Wall Street guy made to order. Then all of a sudden, look what’s happening. Here comes Newt — or, before him, here came Herman. Prior to him, here came Perry; whoever was. But none of these guys — Michele Bachmann included — can be as tied to Wall Street as Mitt Romney.
So I have here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers a story from the Washington Post on December 4th. It is by Peter Wallsten and Anne E. Kornblut. Let me give you the headline: “Some Democrat Strategists Worry About Gingrich’s Potential Appeal.” Some Democrat strategerists? Okay, now stick with me on this. “Newt Gingrich would be such a weak challenger to President Barack Obama, according to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., that his nomination would be ‘the best thing to happen to Democrats since Barry Goldwater.’ Democratic strategist Jim Jordan says he and others in the party ‘passionately’ want to face Gingrich. And from the right, conservative pundit Ann Coulter is warning fellow Republicans that Gingrich’s past extramarital affairs and other baggage make him a far less formidable GOP nominee than Mitt Romney. But…”Continue reading on www.rushlimbaugh.com