Gingrich Collapses in Iowa as Ron Paul Surges to the Front

Print Friendly

A new poll from Public Policy Polling shows that Ron Paul has taken the lead in the Iowa caucus race, while Newt Gingrich’s support is fading fast. A different Gallup poll shows Gringrich still holding the lead, but slipping, while The New York Times has Paul in the lead as well.

Gingrich has seen his numbers in the PPP poll drop from 27 percent to 14 percent in just three weeks, while his favorability rating is now split at 46 percent for to 47 percent against, the worst of any candidate not named Jon Huntsman. That’s quite a fall for someone who looked to be running away with the state and taking charge on the national level.

Mitt Romney has also seen his numbers tick up slightly (to 20%), putting him just behind Paul (23%) for second place. The poll measured voters who are planning to vote in the Republican caucus.

Perhaps the most telling secondary question was, “Do you think Newt Gingrich has strong principles?” Only 36 percent say that he does, but for Paul that number was 73 percent.

The bad news for Paul, however, is that when asked for their second choice for President, only 9% said they would vote for him after their preferred candidate. That means if supporters of any of the second-tier candidates sense defeat and decided to abandon their choice at the last minute, those votes are more likely to go to Romney. Even if Romney doesn’t win, the stronger than expected showing could be the snowball that starts a primary avalanche for him.

Continue Reading on www.theatlanticwire.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
Posting Policy:
The 1st Amendment protects the right to freedom of expression from government interference. However, you are currently posting on private web property and your comments are bound by our site's policies. We have a zero-tolerance policy for comments containing violence (threats, suggestions or direct statements permitting violent or threatening acts or sentiments), racism (suggestion that one "race" is superior to others), crassness or profanity (any word or phrase considered by courteous society to be profane), all caps (a violation of internet etiquette), discourteous behavior (calling names, rude or insulting statements directed at another user/post) or violations similar in nature to any of these offenses. Posts violating our policies of posting are subject to removal and the user may face banning. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.
  • Michael

    This is one dangerous candidate for the GOP. He has no chance of defeating Obama in either a debate or the general election. His foreign policy is an abolute disgrace to conservative prinicipals. Iowa, I hope you regain your senses. Paul is worst possible option in the entire field.

    • know better

      “AGREE”.

      • Sarge

        Agree….nuff said!

        My choice would be……………………………….!

        God Bless America and help us get past this Paul thing!

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          For someone who says “God Bless America”, you would support someone who would kill innocent people to fight against WMDs that are not even there? Really? As a Christian, I can’t support anyone but Dr. Paul for POTUS.

          http://milwaukeestory.com/index.php/2011/12/19/pentagon-says-iran-concerned-primarily-with-deterring-an-attack-344/

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Where are those recovered WMDs from Iraq?

            You have to love war propaganda!

            http://www.scribd.com/doc/30277432/DoD-Unclassified-Report-on-Military-Power-of-Iran

          • george Braneff

            As a Christian you should not be suporting someone that is anti-Christian. Paul does not have Christian views and this will make him unelectable.

          • The Great Ricardo

            Jason, Jason, Jason, the man is a looney. His ideas on Foreign Policy are as far out there as one can get. Like I said, the man’s a looney.

          • Elizabeth

            Dr. Paul says one thing and believes another.
            The article I read about a week ago on him said that he hated blacks and muslims.
            Why on earth would we try to put someone in that COULD NOT beat the current failure?

          • Michael

            As a Christian – do you really believe it is wise not to be proactive against the radical regime in Iran – whose stated goals include wiping Israel off the map – in fulfillment of Psalm 83:4? Leadership is more than willing to begin a conflict to usher in the 12th Imam, claiming that the Jesus you profess will return with him to bring death to Jews and Christians?

            If you want to believe what you read – start with the Word of God and filter the human half-truths through that my friend.

          • Southerner

            In Lebanon and Syria Dummy! The United Nations even helped them get them out…..Just like the 6 Scuds Missiles fired on Israel from just inside Jordan to escape and US military airstrike on them! Stupid Cyber Idiots!!!! I guess you probably think they were throwing cotton balls at each during the Iran-Iraq War!!!!! Or you probably think hey bought the Chemical and Biological weapons they used on each other st the 7/11 store on the corner! You Ron Paul supporters have copied the MSM and the Liberals to a perfection!!! Obviate, Facts History, anything to push your agenda and smear others! Go sit at Al Gore’s feet if you think the mainstream media and everything you read on the internet is correct! Idiots…Cyber Idiots!

          • Ron

            To Jason: I guess you are one of those that has to have a nuclear weapon jammed up your rear end, before you are convinced that Iran is out to kill you?

          • ressex

            I keep hearing people say Ron Paul is looney, or his foreign policy is looney… but I never hear anyone say his economic policy is wrong or looney etc… what’s more important? That said, I don’t think his foreign policy is looney, (and I was in the military) I think his foreign policy is the only one that meets the criteria the Constitution outlines, and that is foreign to most of us since no politician has followed the Constitutuion in “forever”… Ron Paul’s plan is the only one that will save America from financial disaster, and our biggest threat to our security is no money to pay for our military. Most agree on that. So put away your “his foreign policy is nutty” arguement and realize that foreign policy is not at the top of the list of importance in keeping us safe from outside threats. Our biggest threat is continuing a big gov’t PERIOD.!!!

          • salleeann

            Let me see Jason—UUUMMmmmmmm who really gives a frig if you are a Christan or a rag head—-???

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            George Braneff:

            I invite you to look at Ron Paul’s statement of faith:

            “I have accepted Jesus Christ as my Lord and personal Savior, and I endeavor every day to follow Him in all I do and in every position I advocate.”

            http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron:

            No, I am one of those who doesn’t believe in murdering the innocent.

            http://milwaukeestory.com/index.php/2011/12/19/pentagon-says-iran-concerned-primarily-with-deterring-an-attack-344/

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            salleeann:

            Racist.

          • esitduk1

            As a Christian…….you need to pray about that one! Ron Paul is dangerous with his isolationist , head in the sand, views of radical islam. Those people don’t hate us because we bomb them, they hate us because we exist! I’d rather have Jon Huntsman than Ron Paul, and I’d hate to have Jon Huntsman. Dr. Paul cannot beat Obama and therefore should not knock someone out of the chance that is able to do the deed. I love his fiscal ideas, would love to see him as chair of the Fed, but he needs to be kept far, far, far away from the foreign policy decision making process. Wake up Iowa………nearly anyone but Paul!

          • joe

            Paul is the only TRUE AMERICAN.

          • Francisco

            Yep! Dr Ron Paul has what it takes !
            All of you Warmongers are filled with hate and Greed.
            Love and Goodness will prevail contrary to what you may
            want to happen. Ron Paul dosen’t Rule with Fear and
            Lies. Nuff Said

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Elizabeth:

            It’s pretty bad when you are just flat out lying about Ron Paul. You are starting to sound like Bachmann. A compulsive liar.

            Here is the truth:

            Ron Paul is against the death penalty because it is not fair for poor people and people of color. The rich white people get off, while the minorities and poor people die.

            Ron Paul is against the drug war because it is racist. Ron Paul says that black people are only a small percentage of drug users, yet they are the highest number in jail for drug related crimes.

            Ron Paul is a libertarian. Libertarians do not believe that groups have rights and they reject the idea of grouping individuals together. Libertarians believe only individuals have rights. It’s very difficult to have this core set of values and to be racist.

            Austin NAACP President Nelson Linder, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, unequivocally dismissed charges that the Congressman was a racist in light of recent smear attempts, and said the reason for him being attacked was that he was a threat to the establishment.

            “Knowing Ron Paul’s intent, I think he is trying to improve this country but I think also, when you talk about the Constitution and you constantly criticize the federal government versus state I think a lot of folks are going to misconstrue that….so I think it’s very easy for folks who want to to take his position out of context and that’s what I’m hearing,” said Linder.

            “Knowing Ron Paul and having talked to him, I think he’s a very fair guy I just think that a lot of folks do not understand the Libertarian platform,” he added.

            Asked directly if Ron Paul was a racist, Linder responded “No I don’t,” adding that he had heard Ron Paul speak out about police repression of black communities and mandatory minimum sentences on many occasions.

            Dr. Paul has also publicly praised Martin Luther King as his hero on many occasions spanning back 20 years.

            “I’ve read Ron Paul’s whole philosophy, I also understand what he’s saying from a political standpoint and why people are attacking him,” said Linder.

            “If you scare the folks that have the money, they’re going to attack you and they’re going to take it out of context,” he added.

            “What he’s saying is really really threatening the powers that be and that’s what they fear,” concluded the NAACP President.

            This smear campaign against Ron Paul was expected. This just means that we are getting too close for their comfort… Remember, the last person to challenge the Federal Reserve banking system was Kennedy. We all know what happened to him. I wonder how far Ron Paul will get…

            http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/the-american-dream-a-true-story/

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            The Great Ricardo:

            It’s only loony to you because you have no understanding of our foreign policy or what the troops believe.

            Ron Paul is correct.

            http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

          • http://facebook ADRoberts

            You are easily deceived. They went to Syria and back to Russia. That is just like the media claiming there were no WMD but then complaining that they had a chance to get one of the leaders at a Rissen(sp) plant. How can you complain about not getting a terrorist while admitting there is a poison plant and then later claim that those weapons don’t exist. Hypocrit.

          • http://facebook ADRoberts

            Well, I finally got to the end of your comments to yourself. It looks like you have locked yourself in on Ron Paul and he can do NO WRONG. Well there are people who have different opinions than you. And quoting someone from the MAACP means nothing to me. YOu are very quick to throw accusative names out to those who don’t agree with you. You have lost your credibility.

            Oh, and by the way, if your effort is to promote Paul, you are failing badly. Go regroup. And stop flaying at everyone.

          • Retired Marine

            When you have no idea what you are talking about, please be silent. If you weren’t there, and did not have access to the intel, don’t spout nonsense. Take a wild guess where the WMD’s went, I’m certain it can’t cause too much pain to your thought process. Think outside your little box.

          • Robert

            Legalization or tolerance of vices that destroy and enslave men like drug abuse and prostitution are not positions any candidate I will support will have. Ron Paul passes these problems to the states saying the Federal government shouldn’t be involved. I suppose he would have passed slavery to the states or the death penalty. This doesn’t solve the problems, it merely kicks the can down the road. The laws could be different in every state if the Federal government abdicates all Federal authority. I believe there are laws that should be uniform and universal across he entire union, just as the Constitution is a set of laws/rules of governance that are to be uniform across the nation. Congress has authority to make laws that are binding across the land. Our current disdain for Congress is due to an abuse of this power and this abuse does not negate the need for such authority or support the abdication of such a responsibility. There is much more to be said on this, but I cannot support a candidate that does not believe the Federal government has a responsibility and duty to stand against evil at all levels. Perhaps the real crisis here is that mentioned by a founding father,

            “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
            — John Adams

            The salvation and strength of our nation is not to be found in its constitution or natural resources or political personages. Adams saw this and warned us…. he is not the only one…

            “If we ever forget that we are one nation under GOD,
            then we will be a nation gone under.”
            – President Ronald Reagan

            I could recount many others. What I am saying here is that the libertarian position of a government that has no business punishing evil (God being the one who defines evil) is really a position of no government at all. Drug abuse is a destructive enslaving exploiting evil, alcoholism is a destructive enslaving exploiting evil, prostitution is a destructive enslaving exploiting evil. Fornication is a destructive enslaving exploiting evil.

            The government has a responsibility to combat evil…

            “For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”
            – Romans 13:3-4

            I do not support candidates that support evil although I have been forced as a voter to support the lesser of two unwanted choices.

            For myself, I intend to strive to be a better man and citizen and neighbor with each passing day. I intend to avoid going into debt. I intend to work hard at my job and to do my best to contribute to the welfare of others as long as I have the ability. I realize that the solution starts in my heart and in my actions and in my daily life and decisions. I do not look to government or politicians to solve my problems, but I do look to both to stay consistent with the founding principles of this nation.

          • http://Hotmail.com Major Daniel P. Corcoran

            As a Christian? WMD not even there? Are you not forgetting 9/11, USS Cole, Beirut marine barracks bombing just to name a few of the terrorist acts committed against our country and those of other free Democracies? It seems that you have your facts a little skewed! Let’s see, how many were killed in the 911 attacks? More than were killed at Pearl Harbor (that led to war) How about the mass carpet bombing of the British empire by Hitler that led to war. Let us get a little more closer to our timeline. Let us look at Saddam Hussein and the tens of thousands that he had killed for political reasons. Or Qaddaffi for the same reasons as well as being instrumental in providing funding and training camps for terrorists, plane hijackings and setting off bombs aboard passenger airliners! Innocent lives killed? You need to take a good hard look at the facts of reality in which we find ourselves as we deal with your alleged innocent victims! Time for you to do some serious research! Good luck!

          • Donald DeHoff

            Mr. Burns, you know not of what you speak!. You speak of WMD that were “not even there”. The intelligence agencies of several countries had evidence that those problems existed. After the war, they found that Hussan had hidden and entire squadron of jet fighter/bombers in the dessert sands and they found empty cannisters that were designed to carry WMD—and he had previously used gas on some of his own people. If he could hide an squadron of airplanes under the sand, surely a hord of bombs would be no problem–I suspect we will eventually find some of those hidden bombs in the drifting sands of the dessert. With your faulty logic, I can just see you screaming, if Hussan “had” used his WMD–your silence would be deafening!

          • Paul

            Old gezzer Ron Paul’s head ain’t in the sand. It’s up his ass. He is unelectable and a very dangerous old man and can not beat Ovommit at anything.

          • Betty

            Jason, he may be a fine man and a good Christian man, but he’s NOT the man that can stand up and defeat Odummer in any kind of a debate – - and also, he’s just too dang old!

          • jim

            The WMD’s were trucked and flown into Syria. One of Saddam’s Air Force generals has written a book/memoir about it. You’ll find it on Quinn & Rose’s website.

            “If you voted in ’08 to prove you’re not a rascist,
            vote on ’12 to prove you’re not an idiot.”

            ….And please, lets not have to do the same thing again in ’16 in order to prove , again, we’re not idiots.

            Because… (ahem-m-m) a vote for RP is a vote of idiots.

          • RioSam

            @GEORGE;
            Perhaps you should take a look at this and tell me who is and who isn’t a Christian

            http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fshelf3d.com%2F6Dzsfn7m63E&h=JAQEVU_bbAQEFBjTZkoFsORF_isJSUm1c4-0HtposjjXs4Q

            RON PAUL 2012

          • vincent koenig

            Ron Paul is the George Washington of our time and all the rest of them are just going to give us more government control wake up America we are losing our Constitutional Republic i.e.our FREEDOM!!!!!

          • Sherman4040

            All those WMDs are in Syria, where they were moved while Saddam held off the IAEA teams of investigators!

          • Potawatomi13

            I can stand just so much ignorance and stupidity!
            1. Michelle Bachmann is NOT a liar!
            2. Ron Paul is NOT an isolationist(as if that was a bad thing). He is a non interventiontionalist.
            To stop wasting our “foreign aid” money as the worlds welfare agancy and police force/arms supplier would save us many many Billions. If countries can’t raise themselves up from poverty as the US has in our own history then maybe some invader can do a better job. It’s not really OUR business nor should the taxpayers be compelled to support it.

          • John W

            Ron Paul is a WAR VETERAN. He KNOWS what war is all about. Bill O’Reilley is a DRAFT DODGER who gossips like a woman and wants to send YOUR sons, not his, to war. Newt Gingrich is a DRAFT DODGER with the same arcane hypocrisy as Bill O’Reilly. War VETERANS are not isolationists–we are REALISTS who like to fight LEGAL wars, not this serial undeclared war mongering which has BANKRUPTED us, fiscally and morally.

        • Mark

          Couldn’t agree more, Paul is a nut job and needs to go away!

          • Doug Kimberling

            The only nut jobs are the people who don’t see he may be the only answer to turning this country around. This country needs major surgry, not moe soccialaist bandads. He is the only one who sees that 50 years of socialism has destroyed it.

          • Cotterwood

            Retired Marine is CORRECT. Seems Paul and Jason have lost their ‘light’, Just before we went into Iracq, Hussein was trucking WMDs over to Iran and Afghanistan, as fast as he could, thinking he would win the war and get them back. That was shown on TV, they had video via satellite of this going on, that’s why they were trying to get the forces in there faster than they actually did. Now the other terrorist states have them.
            We need somebody that believes in “walk softly but carry a very, very big stick”.

          • Ralph R.

            You sound like a Newt (Nuke) supporter,we need the muslims out of America,they don’t need to move here and plant their mosques here or anywhere near here,their first choice was near the “Twin Towers.”They don’t need one here in America,chase those camel jockey’s back home along with obummer in the lead,are the dirty bombs here already brought in by their terrorists,Iran is moving warships off of our coastline on the east coast. “God is on his way to bring the Christians up,”we won’t be
            here when the world war III starts,also he still does miracles. Did anyone see the look on the face of George Bush Jr. when he was hiding in Florida,he wasn’t in any hurry to go anywhere,why don’t they have people that read body langauges any more of the President,they used to do that,G.Jr. was nervous as all getout,watch (9/11 the search for the truth).” God is Great.”

          • Paul

            He may seem to be a “nut job” because we have all been indoctrinated with socialist ideas. Go here and find out what Dr. Paul is really about. http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

          • RioSam
          • RioSam

            The hyping of the potential nuclear program in Iran is Washington’s attempt to establish a pretext that would garner public support for a strike/destabilization campaign on Iran. The obvious goal would be regime change.

            So the real reason the Pentagon sees a nuclear program in Iran as a threat is not because it would be used as a first strike weapon against Israel, but because it would make it more difficult for the US and its allies to take out the regime in Tehran.

            Many in Washington would love to have cooperative leadership in place in Tehran because it would tilt the control of world energy resources sharply in favor of the US and its allies. But as long as Iran is rogue and friendly with Russia and China we can expect to hear about Iran’s potential nuclear program and the danger it presents Israel and the world.

            In the light of these facts the current debate in the Republican presidential primary seems like nothing but propaganda, save the argument made by RON PAUL..

        • Kanudawg

          Could not agree with you more.
          Paul seems to be in the Lyndon LaRouche category and just as much out in right field somewhere.

        • USAMYCOUNTRY

          sarge……..this is all a liberal thing to make us think that RON PAUL will win…….THIS IS THE LEFTEST MEDIA DOING WHAT THEY ARE GOOD AT…….PAUL spends money to bring in his supporters so he will get a bump where ever he goes………THIS IS A DANGEROUS WORLD AND WE ARE ON THE BRINK OF DESTRUCTION OR POSSIBLE ANNILINATION..FOLKS..!!!!!!!!!..PAUL could never stand up to the obama-sorros machine…….he may have SOME good ideas but he can have this nation isolated and let the rest of the world go by…….THIS IS NOT A LIVE AND LET LIVE WORLD ….YOU OUT THERE THAT WANTS FOR PAUL TO WIN!!!!!!! YOU WILL BE GIVING BACK TO OBAMA …on a silver platter..4 more years…….. DO YOU NOT SEE THE THINGS THAT OBAMA IS ALREADY PLANNING FOR US??????? I AM NOT SURE THAT WE STILL HAVE THE RIGHT CANDIDATE …….but i will never give my vote to PAUL……..i will stay with the majority and may have to hold my nose but i will not help obama get back in…..>>>>>>>

          • ressex

            That is a dirty big gov’t establishment LIE from both sides…!!! Don’t believe it for a second…

          • Michael

            Right you are USAMYCOUNTRY. Ressex, it is an absolute fact that Paul has no little chance of winning the nomination and even less chance of defeating Obama. You don’t think Obama and his billion dollar machine will make Ron Paul look foolsih at all costs. Paul serves foolishness up on a silver platter with his self-serving foreign policy. It doesn’t serve the interests of our country or our allies, has nothing to do with consitutionality. Yet, it does differentiate him from the balance of the field and leans even further to the left than the great American apologist-in-chief.

          • jacy

            Ron Paul may win Iowa but he will never win the election – it would go back to Obama! Paul sounds like an absolute kook on foreign policy when anyone with any common sense can look at the world around us – Iran is building a nuclear bomb; the middle east is violent; and now N. Korea’s dictator is dead – they have a bomb. Despite what this country has done for foreign government through either charity or saving them from powers i.e. Nazi’s and the Japanese in WW2 and WW1; they hate us! Ron Paul believes appeasement will work or just turn our back – then we had 9/11…he is very frightening – maybe he has some good point on domestic problems – but we need someone in the WH with some solid common sense and foreign policy strenght -

          • ressex

            Michael,
            I disagree. I am tired of the establishment. Left is fast track to 100% Socialism, the republican establishment is the slow track to 100% Socialism. I’m not for either one. Yes I am a Libertarian mostly, but a Christian first. and I see a lot of lies about Ron Paul as an isolationist, he is not. As a weak defense posture, he is not. He is not as aggressive as the establishment because he is not funded by special interests that want to us the military to further their business. i.e. Oil etc… Look at what Eisenhower said about the military industrial complex… we can disagree, that’s ok. but I will not buy the big lies that the R’s and D’s propogate. I look up my own info, and do not believe any side until I research it from a reasonable impartial viewpoint. God Bless.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            OK, enough of the nonsense, now for the real truth…

            If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.
            Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.
            Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party
            Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.
            Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.
            Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

            Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

          • ressex

            I’d say you can quit worrying about Iran because if we are not interferring with Israel, then Israel will wipe Iran off the map as soon as they think they are in real danger. Obama hates Isreal and will try to stop them and then we are in deep crap!!!

          • Cotterwood

            USAMYCOUNTRY,
            Good for you, I’m with you all the way. Remember, Obama gave all our tax money to the unions so he could get most of it back for his re-election. We’re dealing with
            liars, criminals, theves, basically folks who want to destroy this country and turn it into a socialist regime with an illegal alien in the white house. WE MUST FIGHT, AND FIGHT HARD, HARDER THAN THE SOCIALISTS TO SAVE THIS COUNTRY. THIS IS A FIGHT TO THE DEATH FOR OUR COUNTRY.

          • Michael

            Ressex – if we fail to worry about Iran and radical Islam’s delcaration of war on the US, it isn’t just Israel that is in real danger. Do we want the the proactive solution – or do we enjoy ending up in the reactive posture that led to the 9/11 attacks. Ignoring the threat doesn’t maake it disappear.

          • littlesnake

            usamycountry—-isolation?? I see you are for supporting Greece and sending my tax money there so the lazy bastards can live off the government and not work for their living. Do you really want the USA (mycountry) to do the same as the euro click. They developed the euro to compete against us, to bring us down and Obumer fell for it.

          • LocalYokel35

            Consider that the compromise of majority is the sole source of continuation of the corruption at hand.

          • RioSam

            I’m sure they, the warmongering oligarchs, will be happy to see they so many faithful sheeple that will do their fighting and dying for their financial gain! “wakin up is hard to do”
            RON PAUL FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY

          • ressex

            Michael, Ron Paul is not against going to war when necessary, AND when congress declares war, and as a veteran, neither am I. But if we cannot pay for it what good will it do to declare it. I can declare I have a Ferrari in my garage but I cannot afford one, so there isn’t one actually there…

          • Pat78

            To USAMYCOUNTRY: I use to think that about Paul also until I read one of the books he wrote: END THE FED which made so much sense! I previously supported Cain who turned out to endorse Newt. I’m disappointed. Paul’s head and shoulders more educated, honest and humble than the rest of the Republican candidates. We can continue to vote for people like Obama Lite or we can vote for someone who is a true patriot as defined by the U.S. Constitution that many of us are somewhat familiar with after all the arrogant have shredded it little by little for the last 100 years. Why do you think Obama and his teleprompter could beat anyone? He’s an empty suit. He’s not carrying out his own agenda. It’s Soro’s and the other arrogants behind the curtain manipulating the whole world. It’s sickening! Obama and minions will not be able to bring out any dirt on Dr. Ron Paul as they will have no problem burying the other nominees with their own dirt. We really do need to think about that. From what I’ve been reading, the true majority appear to be supporting Ron Paul this go round now that people are educating themselves.
            Let’s discuss this with open minds. I think we all want the same thing–Nobama, but how we go about making that happen is where we disagree. Anyone would do a better job than Obama’s done. Anyone will be able to beat him. Look beyond to the next 4 to 8 years. If we go with an Obama Lite, we’ll be turning Congress, etc. back to the commies. Then they will finish the great nation we love. Romney and Newt qualify as Obama Lites.

          • wordmaster

            USA, you seem to contradict yourself. You say Ron Paul brings in his supporters, why are the others unable to bring in supporters like that? Because they don’t have any that care that much? Because theirs will be sitting on the couch while Ron Paul can enthuse people enough to get them to come out and vote?

            In reality, the dems know full well That Ron Paul is the only one they have to worry about. As long as they can keep him from winning the republican nomination, Obama will be safe.

            They bad mouth him or ignore him in the leftstream media, the dem trolls jump into forums to tell us he is a “nut” all because they know he is the only one who can beat Obama.

            Against Obama, Ron Paul will pull the votes of the republicans, the independents, the youth, the libertarians and even a large number of disgruntled dems. None of the others can even hope to pull the votes of all these groups and it will take every one of them to beat Obama.

            With any of the other candidates, many of the republicans will, as they did with McCain, sit home and the other groups will either go third party or dem. Ron Paul is our only hope to beat Obama.

            More importantly, he is the only one that will make any difference if he is elected. He is the only one who believes in keeping a very, very, strong military and the only one who realises we must have a good economy in order to afford that strong military.

          • vincent koenig

            hey army my son is a Marine and I know that as a parent of U.S.Marine I would feel much better knowing that a President Ron Paul would have his and you life in mind more than all the other candidates who are ignorant of the writing of our founders and the constitution which you took an oath to uphold and defend We have an extremest in the White House right now we need an constitutional extremest in the white house to fix it he has always voted constitutionally (no surprises) Hey Army from the bottom of my heart ,Thank You .

          • knaughtyknight

            If Ron Paul does not win the Republican nomination, then I will vote for Obama, as I know what his true position is!!! Then, unleash the “Hounds of War” !!!

        • Michael

          Sarge – if I had to make a call right now I’d lean Gingrich. I prefer Santorum, but I don’t believe he has a chance in getting the nomination or winning the general.

          • esitduk1

            Whoever gets the nomination (probably Gingrich or Romney) needs to pick Santorum as a running mate. I have been more impressed with his thoughtful answers and grasp of the issues that many of the others. You are correct, I believe, that he cannot win. Santorum would “shore up” some of the true conservative voters for either one of those, both of which are much more moderate than I like to see. Don’t be fooled, Paul is not a true conservative. He talks like one when speaking about fiscal issues, but he rants like a lunatic when he changes to foreign policy discussions. The man is a moron when it comes to foreign policy. We can’t just ignore the rest of the world and not expect to be fighting them on our own soil some day very soon.

          • RoBoTech

            he won’t if the people that actually support him won’t vote for him.
            That unelectable crap in in your mind!
            Time after time I read idiots say “I like “XXX”, but they can’t win, so I won’t vote for “XXX”.
            They CAN’T win if clueless supporters turn them backs on them!
            You see my friends, people like this guy is the problem. They allow themselves to get brainwashed by the Socialists and MSM.
            I am not a Santorium supporter, nor Ron Paul, but I never say any are unelectable. It’s the Primary for Gawds sake. And the best candidate WILL win, so vote for who you support.
            If your candidate doesn’t win, SO WHAT! At least you supported them!
            The General is a different duck. But, I still say, vote YOUR principles, because no one else is going to!
            Unless you just want to be part of “the in-crowd” that the MSM spouts.
            That’s how we got Obama!
            What buffoonery.

          • Anthony San Diego

            esitduk1,
            And it’s apparent that you sir, are a genius(?) on foreign policy. Wake up.

          • wordmaster

            With Gingrich, the entire thing will be about all his long history of progressiveism and family problems. The press will not have time to bring up any of the Obama problems for harping Gingrich’s problems. With Newt as the republican candidate, just as with any of them other than Ron Paul, Obama will get another 4 years.

            With any of them other than Ron Paul, we will just see McCain act 2.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            WORD MASTER…….becareful of the polls…..RON PAUL BRINGS IN BUSES OF PEOPLE…..MOSTLY YOUNG PEOPLE…….(NO PROBLEM WITH THAT..) BUT IF THE OTHER CANDIDATES DO NOT…..IT IS NOT BECAUSE THEY CAN NOT GET THEIR PEOPLE THERE….YOU CAN ENTHUSE ANY ONE IF YOU RUN $$$$$$$BEFORE THEIR EYES…. THIS IS AMERICA (at least for a while) each of us see a candidate in their own way…..i can not say that i am happy with any of the candidates.100%…..i just do not feel comfortable with dr paul. …i do not think that being a constitutionalist makes it all o.k. ….WE NEED TO HAVE GOOD COMMON SENSE WITH IT… heard paul say on t.v. that it did not worry him about iran getting a nuke……..why not????? every one else can!!!! WELL .because they have said that they will destroy israel .and the west………I WANT SOME ONE INPOWER THAT . WILL STAND UP TO IRAN………….I ALSO DO NOT WANT MARAJUANA MADE LEGAL…….

        • don

          nuff said ha- please any one but mitt or newt. mr. insurance an mr big gov. no way

          • esitduk1

            Either one will be better than what we have. Osama Obama is counting on foolish conservatives to stay away from the polls because their favorite candidate didn’t get the nomination. That sort of idiocy is dangerous for the country. Wake up Iowa…….nominating Paul is like……….Nevada electing Harry Reid again…………or America electing Barack Hussein Obama………..What the HELL were they thinking!!!!!!!!!

          • Michael

            Robotech – I agree with a portion of what you said. I dd vote my conscience in ’08 and intend to do so again in ’12. If history is any indicator, it won’t matter one bit as I had three candidates remianing in ’08 (voted Huck) and willl likley have three or less by the time it’s my turn this time around.

            Let me rephrase – I suspect Santorum will not be one of them. If Santorum is still standing – he will recieve my vote.

            By the way – best to leave words like “idiot” directed at the person rather than the policy out of your argument. I typically wouldn’t give such talk the time of day. Leave the personal attacks to the other side and take the high road.

        • Nanna Gail

          Sarge: I don’t know how “looney”, or “Dangerous” Ron Paul might be, but I do know his attitude towards Isreal is extremely “stupid”. I dislike several of his policies and personally, I would really prefer Michele Bachmann get the candidacy. I also think, Michele could win against obumbler and would be an excellect President.
          Why are the male population still sticking their heads in the sand and refusing to acknowledge that a woman President, especially Michele Bachmann, would do wonders for America.
          We have had the “compulsory” “colored/ethnic” one and look at the horrific mess HE has made of our country.

          • Fritz

            I,m a male and have always said that it’s time to put a woman for Pres. We had males for so long and we gave a Black men a chance and he screwed it all up.
            So Michele who believes in Christ, the constitution.the core princible a Mother who raised 5 of her own children plus foster children as well the 2nd amentmen also drilling for oil or at least support the Kyestone proj. that will put 20000 + people to work.

          • mqg25

            If your so fired up about “poor little Israel” then I suggest you immigrate and join their military, but please don’t allow any more of our brave soldiers to be killed so you can satisfy your undying lust for more murder and mayhem.
            For those who claim to be “Christian” (who love death and destruction)) I have a question. If Israel is the “apple of God’s eye” then why should we have to pay them tribute and fight their wars? Should not God take care of them without our help?

          • Michael

            As a male, I have no beef with Bachmann. However, I don’t believe that she will stand up in the general election for the very same reason Sarah Palin didn’t on the undercard 4 years ago. The MSM HATES conservative women with a passion. There is nothing they will not do to assure that they are marginalized. 2012 is going to be far worse than the last election with the negativity – because that is the only road to travel down given Obama can’t run on his record and withstand the scrutiny.

          • RioSam

            So what you’re saying is lets do something stupid again and hope for a different outcome..
            Typical sheeple!
            RON PAUL 2012

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            NANA GAIL…….i do not know why it is so hard to think that a woman can not be PRES. …….LET ME THROW THIS AT YOU……..I HEARD ON FOX NEWS THIS A.M. ……that the dems that are not happy WITH THE ANNOINTED ONE……WILL WRITE IN HILLARY!!!!!!……SHE SITS AT THE RIGHT HAND OF OBAMA….AND WHEN YOU SEE HIM …YOU SEE HER……. NO DIFFERENCE IN MY THOUGHTS.

          • wordmaster

            You think Ron Paul giving Israel an 8 billion dollar edge over the muslims is a bad policy? That is what Ron Paul proposes.

        • http://facebook ADRoberts

          Fill in that blank with Sarah Palin. She is still way better than any of these fence posts.

          • Cotterwood

            ADRoberts,

            My ‘wish list’ is Chris Cristi for President and Sarah Palin OR Arixonas Governor as VP. We would win by a landslide if we could just convince Chris Cristie to run,
            EVERYBODY would get behind him.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            ADROBERTS…….SARAH PALIN SAID ON FOX NEWS TONIGHT THAT IT IS NOT TO LATE FOR ANYONE TO JUMPIN……..she hadSAID EARLIER THAT SHE WAS NOT REALLY SATISFIED WITH THE ANSWEES FROM THE OTHER CANDIDATES…,.. OH GOD I PRAY

        • cleareyes

          Open your brain, and your EYES.
          This is a sucker punch of the DamRats.
          You believe this you’ll believe anything.
          Just like the song says!

      • Anita

        Absolutely! He is dangerous for America because he’s a nutcase!

        • Joan

          Anita, I agree Ron Paul is one weirdo & kooky!! I don’t understand what others see in this guy he is not Presidential material!!!!!

          • Michael

            If you can read the US Constitution, you would better understand Paul’s policies.

          • Bob

            I agree also. Ron Paul is an oddball. Just read Newt Gingrich, “Contract with America.” It will show you how great a leader he will be.

          • Marcolarco

            How true! He makes some sense on some issues, but as far as foreign policy and the military…this guy is wacko and would be a laughing stock against Zero! He’s exactly what we DON’T need to win in November. Please…anybody but Paul!

          • Michael

            Hey other Michael – I can read the US Constitution and I believe that Ron Paul is a foreign policy crackpot. National defense is stressed as the pre-eminent function of the federal government. Under a Paul administration – our interests at home and our necessary allies abroad will be at risk.

          • Al

            Yeah… Newt and Mitt and Obama is exactly what this country needs right now (insert sarcastic look here) … They’re all copies of each other… Good call Joan!
            Let’s pile on the debt and kill a few million people… As long as the President looks Presidential… Pathetic!

          • http://google Thomas Dalling

            America sat back while another MAD MAN, Hitler killed millions of Jews. Ron Paul would do the same thing FDR did with Hitler, Nothing. Ron Paul has the same attitude that Obama has. Be nice and do nothing.

          • http://JohnGalt.Princeton@gmail.com John Galt

            @Thomas Dalling:
            America (FDR and his socialist buddies) sat back while Lenin & Stalin murdered over 25,000,000 Christian!

          • ressex

            well said Al…

          • Ann

            If we do not get the right man in office , we are in trouble and will not have a president but a dictator, marxist,or communist leader. We are at a Y in the road.

          • Pat78

            Joan, have you read any of his books or is he just not as good looking as Romney or JFk? What is presidential anyway? We’ve had presidents who “look” presidential who have brought our nation down. That’s not a good measure.

          • Paul

            Go here and find out what those that are informed see in Dr. Ron Paul: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

          • wordmaster

            Hey, Michael, you should really, really read what Ron Paul has actually said instead of regurgitating spin and lies from the leftist media. In reality, Ron Paul will have a much stronger military than any of the others. He is ALL about defence and would also protect our borders.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Good logic… lol

          You really made your case with that statement…

          If only you knew what it means to be American, follow the constitution, and ‘act’ like a Christian.

          Ron Paul 2012!

          • Gary Schaumberg

            To Bob in regards to NG’s ‘Contract with America’, I agree NG is a great orator. However, ‘talk’ is not ever been very expensive to administer. Regarding his CWA in the early 90′s, check out his voting record in congress. Actions are regarded as speaking louder than words. Don’t know about others, but I vote based primarily on the candidate’s previous voting record, in cases where their words do not agree with their actions.

          • Louis

            Jason,
            These shills are really pounding on you. But it’s pretty simple really, anyone who believes in the constitution is American, and those who don’t are anti american. Ron Paul= American…… Those pounding against Jason= anti American. Ron Paul will only impose constitutional principles regardless of his PERSONAL BELIEFS. So let the American haters keep thier rants going. They have some explaining to do as to why they hate the constitution so much.

          • Art

            Sucks!

          • Michael

            My Christian friedn – look at Genesis 12:3.

            Gen 12:3 I will bless those who bless you,
            and whoever curses you I will curse;
            and all peoples on earth
            will be blessed through you.”

            Here we have a regime that has a stated goal of wiping Israel from the afce of the earth – and you and Ron Paul want to stick a middle finger out to Israel?

          • Southerner

            Jason you are full of it! Where in the Constitution did they use the term “Christian”????? “Under one God” and “Almighty God” …..Yes! If people like you were given control then and Thank God thy were not! You idiots would have recreated exactly what the Europeans and others ran away from to come to the New World! You just prove you know practically nothing of the things you speak!

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Michael:

            Where in the Bible does it say blow the hell out of those who don’t like you? I remember Jesus saying something about loving your enemies and turning the other cheek.

            There is also something about Christian Just War Theory. Preemptive wars are not part of this. Neither is going to war with countries who never attacked us like Iraq or Libya.

            Iran never said they wanted to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth or anything like that. Once again you are operating on false information.

            http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/23/politics/truth-squad-iran-israel/index.html

          • http://google NL Coop

            SINCE YOU THINK YOU ARE SO PERFECT. WHY DON’T YOU JUST WRITE YOURSELF IN AS A CANIDATE. HA. HA. LET’S ALL GET TOGETHER AND VOTE OBAMA OUT. THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS. JASON!!!!!!!

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Unlike Ron Paul, I wouldn’t win. See the numbers are all saying that Ron Paul is the only Republican that can win. The numbers do not lie.

            If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.
            Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.

            Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party

            Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.

            Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.

            Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

            Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years.

            On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

          • Michael

            Can I assume that you are talking to me? Why don’t you bolster your accusation with some in context Scripture? Why don’t you respond to Gen 12:3 and Psalm 83:4? What – shall we “turn the other cheek” while our ally is being bullied, or should we be joint caretakers like the Good Samaratin? Shall we refuse to defend our interests at teh expense of another 9/11 attack? You come out here claiming moral superiority at every turn…yet haven’t offered a shred of Biblical support for your position, Either do so, or do not invole the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ in your argument.

        • EMILY MARTINSEN

          and how do you diagnos O???????????????????????????????

        • reason1

          And you think Obama isn’t ?

        • The Great Ricardo

          As I’ve said many times, Ron Paul reminds me of the Black Knight from “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.”

        • Angela

          He is a LIBERAL. He blames AMerica for 9/11 and apologizes for her. He has no moral ethics if he says anyone can marry whoever they wish-same sex-whatever and he wants to legalize marijuana! This is an appeaser not a COnstitutionla Leader.

          • Louis

            Angela,
            How do you defend personal liberty? God gives everyone the right to do as they will and suffer the consequences of their actions. In other words, he gives each person the liberty to make their own choices in this life. Salvation can come by no other means then by free will or free choice. Otherwise we have the crusades enforcing religion and politics down our throats. Because Ron Paul believes this does not make him immoral or unchristian. In fact, it makes him more christian, because God even gives you the right to do as you please. As far as the 911 thing you are parroting, Ron Paul has NEVER blamed AMERICA for it. He was only quoting what the CIA and other official documents have written. IE. the policy’s of former administrations’ have resulted in “Blowback” causing 911. What is wrong with quoting these sources to make a point? I hope you understand these two clarifications.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            OK, let’s get something strait. Ron Paul is not a liberal. Ron Paul is a conservative Republican libertarian.

            Libertarian and Liberal are not the same thing, not even close. My suggestion: Get a dictionary or learn to Google.

            Second. Ron Paul does NOT blame America for 9/11! Ron Paul only recognizes what the CIA calls blowback. (Google that too) If you ignore this, you are doing it at your own risk, and the risk of ever other innocent American. Ron Paul is a STRONG supporter of marriage. He just doesn’t believe that it’s the Federal governments business, and marriage should be handled in the church. Ron Paul has been married for over 50 years. Ron Paul is pro-life. Ron Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life act that defines life at conception making abortion into murder. Ron Paul wants to overturn Roe v. Wade.

            Ron Paul recognizes that alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana and pharmaceutical drugs. How many people have died from alcohol? Many. How many have died from pharmaceutical drugs? Many. How many people have died from marijuana? Not many if any. Why are sick people banned from using marijuana if they need it and have a prescription? Why would you put a sick person in jail? I am a Christian and I don’t use drugs, and I think drugs are bad, but I do understand the problem we have with this. I don’t understand how people like you cannot see this.

            Ron Paul is the only consistent candidate running. Ron Paul votes 100% in favor of the constitution. He has a perfect voting record. Who else can claim any of this?

          • Durango

            Angela,
            You need to read up on 9/11 and the missing reports and America’s involvement. You may take a different view.

          • RioSam

            Ron Paul has never applogized for America. He simply states that having our MILITARY occupy middle eastern countries has created hatred for us by those same countries..therego; Blowback! Which is also agreed upon by several DOD and CIA people.
            He is not proposing to legalize drugs. But rather let each individual state legislate their own drug laws. The same goes for same-sex marriage; state by state. I would encourage those that are obviously quite mistaken about his stances on issues to check them out at http://www.ronpaul2012.com
            Make no mistake, if the US was threatened or attacked, Ron Paul would absolutely go to congress and ask for an Act of War. He would not, as some would believe and have others believe, hide his head in the sand. He didn’t dodge the draft in the 60′s, unlike Newt Gingrich, and he wouldn’t dodge being Commander in Chief..

            Have the American people become so “war minded” that they simply cannot conceive of a different way for our country to exist and flourish?

            RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!

          • RobertELegal

            Sorry Angela, try again. Ron Paul blames 9/11 on the insane foreign policy of the USA. Not only has it bankrupted this country, it has made us hated all over the world. Killing people until they love has never worked nor will it.
            As far as marriage, Ron Paul says the state shouldn’t be involved in it whatsoever. It is a religious/cultural matter and the government should stay out of it.
            Marijuana? Who cares? It’s not a legitimate function of government to prevent a person from making dubious choices. Also, where does the Constitution empower the Federal government to babysit adults? Given the absolute and resounding failure of the insane war on drugs, why are people even arguing about it? The drug war is worse than the drugs.
            It’s disturbing to see so many people who haven’t the slightest clue about the founding principles embraced by this country. If you people want a statist, war monger. Vote for Obama. He hasn’t done anything that Bush wouldn’t have done.
            As for a debate with Obama, I’m sure RP would relish that match up. Obama’s war mongering, banker coddling and nanny/police state record cannot stand up to RP’s fidelity to the gasping Constitution.

          • wordmaster

            Angela, you really should take the few minutes needed and read the constitution. When you do, you will find that marriage and drugs are not in the limits placed on the Federal government, these are, just as Ron Paul has said, state issues, not federal issues.

            Also, if you read what Ron Paul actually said rather than regurgitating leftist media lies and spin, you will find that he does not apologise for America and you will find that he also does not blame America or Americans for 9-11. Instead, he blames extremely poor foriegn policy.

      • wereallscrewed

        The problem is that you have all been “brainwashed” by the LAME STREET MEDIA as to what FOREIGN POLICY SHOULD BE.

        All they do is “BEAT the WAR DRUMS” 7-24 and try to keep us SCARED so we will keep making the CHOICES they TELL US to make!

        If we keep spending “MONEY we don’t have” on 900 Military bases around the globe, the Military Industrial Complex, and these endless wars, our ECONOMY will “Colapse COMPLETELY” and then how safe will we be, when we can’t pay for anything , including Beans and Bullets!

        • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

          Do not fear Ron Paul. Remember in 1963, Dallas, Texas, a president was shot and killed. Why? Because a few months earlier, he had signed an executive order to end the Federal Reserve, AND THEY KILLED HIM BECAUSE OF IT! Ron Paul wants to do away with the fed. If he is nominated and wins (fat chance of that) he will not live to see innaguration day!

          • Bert Dean

            I’d like to see some verifiable, factual documentation for this claim.

          • JRRS

            BS !

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            JRRS: What do you mean BS?

            That is exactly what happened.

            http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/the-american-dream-a-true-story/

          • Donald

            d rash is right on. The Federal Reserve is killing America. How can they make 82 Billion $ profit when
            40 million Americans are on food stamps and the economy is dying. The only way they have to profit is print the money or pick the tax payers pocket. If tax payers did what they do they would put us in prison.
            If America owes a dollar, all the profit the Federal Reserve makes should go back in the general fund by law. I don’t see anywhere in their charter that authorizes them to put money in foreign banks. Congress created the monster and congress can dissolve them. Federal Reserve was created to protect the money institutions and AMERICAN people. It is time for a new system. They have certainly protected the banks friendly to the government and forgot the people.
            I am for Michele Bachmann.
            IIt does not matter who is selected to run there will be a third party entry and Obama will be the next and last elected President.

          • RioSam

            @Bert and JRRS; That is absolutely true. He and his brother Robert had everything in place to abolish the Fed. And when they killed John, Robert tried to carry on the same fight and they killed him too…and do you think John Jr plane blowing up was just an “accident?” He was planning on announcing his candidacy to run for US Senate in the state of New York…and some say he wanted to carry on where his father had left off. Well they took him out early so it wouldn’t look so government orchestrated…and of course we all know who became that US Senator for NY..Hillary Clinton; memeber of: CFR, Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission..
            My only prayer is that nothing will happen to Ron Paul if he wins the nomination…but I do admit, I am concerned for his well being..

        • minnie

          If obama keeps on spending our UNearned childrens income and using the printing machine for unnecessary stimulas money, we will not have money to defend our country, thanks to this ratical that have put us in the dangerous position. We should vote for Newt for President in 2012.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            If you vote for progressive New for president, then I would have to question whether or not you are racist. Why? Well, they both have liberal ideas. They are both progressives. If you are too shallow or lazy to look at their history and not just what comes out of their mouths to win votes, then you deserve Obama and Newt. (two of the same kind) So if you are voting in progressive liberal Newt over progressive liberal Obama, I have to ask why? The only difference I see between the two is their skin color.

          • RioSam

            Newt Gingrich is nothing other than another Obama of a different color!
            Member of the CFR and a Bilderberg attendee..translation; Globalist, NWO and a more than willing puppet for the Bankers of the Fed and the Military Industrial Complex..
            In other words; S.O.S.

            Wakin up is hard to do
            RON PAUL 2012

        • Angela

          What is wrong with you ? Ron Paul is a liberal and hates the Constitution just like obummer! He would NEVER defeat obummer! He wants to allow people to do whatever they want-marry who they want-legalize marijuana and much more! Our country would become more chaotic than it is today! You are thinking straight about what is real here. Ron Paul could never be a President.

          • Louis

            God allows people to do whatever they want, marry who ever they want, and even smoke marijuana and much more. It’s called free will and he allows it! Now how does Ron Paul “hate” the constitution? In the same way god hates the bible maybe??????? By allowing man the CHOICE to do good or evil???????

          • Juggernaut69

            I do not support Paul for a number of reasons. However removing the government from marriage is a good thing. Last I checked it was a contract between you, your spouse and God. We know the biblical opinion of same sex couples so this is something you have to contend with not rely on the government. I do not trust his foreign policy however I do agree with abolishing the fed. One question to go back on the gold standard do we still have gold in Fort Knox or is it a hoax.
            We need to pull some of our troops home and keep them ready to deploy at any corner of the globe we need. Bringing them home will save money and keep families together. the savings would be substantial enough to deploy them if needed. I do think Iran and Pakistan should be under close watch. We need to stand strong with Israel. I could go on but do not intend to run for office or blog here so you get the picture. Paul is right in a few places but he is
            1) most unlikely to win
            2) is wrong where it could be the most dangerous

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron Paul is not a liberal. Are you being serious or are you joking? Ron Paul is a conservative. Ron Paul is a libertarian. Ron Paul is no liberal. Are you confused?

            In a recent poll, Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama. Who should I believe, the polls… or you. I think I will stick with the polls, thank you. Ron Paul believes marriage should be handled by the Church. What is wrong with that? Ron Paul is right about marijuana. How many people die from alcohol or alcohol related deaths? Many. How many people die from pharmaceutical drugs? Many. How many people die from marijuana? Not many if any. The only people dying from marijuana are the people getting killed by the police, drug dealers, and innocent victims of these two. If marijuana were legal, nobody would be dying. Why are sick people being locked up for using marijuana with a prescription as medicine? Is this fair? Yet they can take a dangerous pharmaceutical drug that (if you watch the TV commercials) can cause death or permanent damage with no problems. What is wrong with America?

            You people need to get your priorities strait!

            Ron Paul 2012!
            Restore America before it collapses.

          • mqg25

            “Paul…Is a liberal and hates the constitution” Being a student of history and political philosopy I find you comment “mind numbing.” Are you serious? Have you ever read the Constitution or the federialist, (anti) federialist papers? Do you even have a clue? Can a student still graduate from high school without passing their American Civics test?

          • RioSam

            @Angela: You really need to educate yourself about Ron Paul. You could not be more wrong if you tried. He is a Libertarian leaning Republican, NOT a liberal. All during his time in Congress he has always voted on every issue according to the articles stated in the Constitution. Go to http://www.ronpaul2012.com and do some reading, won’t take long..

            RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012

          • ressex

            in addition to Jason’s info on marijuana,it was only made illegal because the lobbyist from the cotton industry made it so… as hemp was the main and only competition to the cotton industry back then (early 1900′s I believe).

          • knaughtyknight

            If you want to speed up the Second Coming of ‘Immanuel, for those of you who do not know His Name, and are tired of waiting on the “Rapture”, then Vote a “straight” Democratic ticket, if that adjective can still be applied to either party !!!

        • Michael

          Media beating the war drums?? You mean the media that has their head up Obama’s tail?? The “blame America” president??? Wow – now I’m really ready for the rapure…I have officially heard Paul and his backers use every excuse in the book.

      • http://googlechrome David

        I think Ron being a liberal would be another obama. There goes my republican vote. I’ll go with the 3rd party candidate unless it changes again.

        • Morton Friedman

          There is a world of difference between ‘libertarian’ and the usurped term ‘liberal’. One can be a conservative libertarian, but a libertarian liberal is an oxymoron. Ron Paul is not my favorite, but I find it a stretch to call him ‘liberal’. A conservative libertarian, Yes.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron Paul is very conservative. Ron Paul is a Republican libertarian. (Libertarian does not mean liberal)

        • USAMYCOUNTRY

          david……..DRAFT SARAH PALIN………..SUNDAY on FOX NEWS they asked SARAH who she would endorse…….SHE SAID THAT NONE HAS GIVEN HER ALL THAT SHE NEEDED TO HEAR FROM THEM…….the media is pushing PAUL because they know that he would come out looking “”whipped”"”and make us look foolish……..can not say it any stronger

          • Michael

            Isn’t that the truth. I don’t think the guy is above running as a third party option when common sense sets in and he is soundly rejected by the end of the primaries. The guy hung in the ’08 campaign until well after the dust settled. Ronny – it isn’t the messenger that isn’t resonating 0 its the message.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Ron Paul is NOT a liberal. This goes to show our education level here in the U.S.A. (Another reason to dismantle the Department of Education)

          Liberal is not the same thing as Libertarian. Not even close.

          Please do your homework before posting CrAzY nonsense.

          http://www.teapartyactivists.com/tea-party-issues/why-shouldnt-the-tea-party-want-to-eliminate-the-department-of-education/

          • Michael

            I think you probably misunderstand – its his foreign policy off the chains liberal. See my other responses to your posts on Christian response and Constitutional authority for his lack of substantivve foreign policy.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            I looked at your crazy responses. They make no logical sense.

        • RioSam

          Ron Paul is NOT a Liberal. He is a Libertarian, BIG difference.
          But you are right in line with the Paul supporters when it comes to the General Election. They will not vote for the lesser of 2 evils again. No Obama No Gingrich and No Romney. So they will write in Ron Paul or vote the Libertarian Party candidate and that means another 4 yrs of Obama..So choose wisely when you vote in your primary, which simply means if you don’t vote for Ron Paul that will mean with all probability that Obama will win the G.E. VOTE RON PAUL FOR PEACE AND PROSPERITY

          • Michael

            I won’t be bullied into a tyranny of the minority on either end of the spectrum. That doesn’t help make your case. Being the advocate for the Constitution that he claims to be, Mr. Paul should bow out gracefully when the people have their say once again.

            If Mr. Paul should happen to swing enough support, I will pull the lever for him in the general because four more years of Obama is far worse than anything any of GOP candidates would bring to the table.

      • Joan B

        Did Iowans listen to Paul’s comments at the debate ? Paul would put us in jeopardy insfar as national security….the man’s nutty !
        Joan

        • candi

          a total nut….

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          You are incorrect. Ron Paul is the only one who wants to defend our country, not the borders between Iraq and Afghanistan.

          http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

          • RioSam

            RIGHT ON!

        • michael peck

          i bet u supported mc cain too didnt u? and what happened? rp is the only choice, if he doesnt get nomination im voting for anyone but a repub or a dem……….

          • ressex

            word!

        • knaughtyknight

          It is you that does not understand Ron Paul`s Constitutional position on foreign policy-”you can not buy friends”, and he would destroy any country in the world, including Israel, but only if Congress DECLARES WAR !!! As commander-in-chief of the military, the president is not supposed to start the war, read- “preemptive strike”, only follow Congress` orders !!!

      • PaulRupp

        GOP foreign policy is an absolute disgrace to conservative principals, as are those who believe endless wars and endless spending of money we do not have!

        Obama is more of the same failed ideas!!!

        The good DR Ron Paul has the right approach, just the medicine America needs, finally. . .

        • PaulRupp

          What did Dr Ron Paul say about going to war last debate? Well, that you need the support of the people, then congress declares WAR and we go and kick azz and get it over with.

          How is that weak?

          • Michael

            Allowing Iran to go unchecked. Denying that there is any evidence to support they are close to a nuke. That is a dangerous pre-911 strategy that screams another domestic attack if implemented. Complacency led to the costly wars of the last decade. Shall we start all over again down that road we just travelled by necessity or shall we have a proactive defense strategy? Pay now – or pay a lot more later in gold and in blood.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            How do you figure Ron Paul is allowing Iran to go unchecked? There is a difference between knowing what is going on in the world and bombing everyone you suspect.

            The reason 9/11 happened is because of too much regulation. If guns were allowed on the planes, 9/11 wouldn’t have been able to happen.

            When we go bankrupt and the rest of the world realizes that the dollar is just worthless paper, we will all pay in blood. Our only hope is to bring the troops home, balance the budget, stop printing money out of thin air, strengthen our own country from within and guard our own borders.

            This will all end. When we go bankrupt and the other countries reject the dollar, it will all end. When we can’t buy oil because nobody is accepting paper anymore, only gold, it will all end. What then? The troops will come home, one way or another. Will it be because we brought them home and fixed our economy, or will it be because we collapsed from within. Then when we are attacked by these countries that hate us, will we be strong enough to survive? Probably not. I suggest we pull back, strengthen our economy, rebuild, then we live to fight another day. That is a strong foreign policy.

          • ressex

            Jason Burns… INDEED!!!!! Ditto!!!!! well said… etc…. someone gets it… now I pray for more of the USA to understand this…

        • RioSam

          Absolutely Correct!

          Ron Paul 2012

          • Al

            Jason got it right!

      • Les

        I agree, Ron Paul is not good to be our canidate, & sounds & acts like an
        oddball, but anyone is better than Ovomit.

        • libertybound

          Oh yes Ron Paul is an oddball, he is the only one who believes in freedom and believes in the constitution. Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are going to keep giving what we are already getting, more bailouts, more tarp, more getting into expensive wars where our men go and die in vain. We need to mind our own business. As long as we get into these expensive wars more money is going to go overseas while we starve here at home. All Ron Paul is saying let us communicate more instead of jumping in and making everything our business. Like Israel they know about how to take care of themselves, why do we have to be in on their business. Do you really want your sons and daughters, brothers, sisters, mother and fathers to die in a war that was none of our business. THINK ABOUT IT! How can we take care of our borders when they are all over the world, who is left here to protect our borders especially the U.S./Mexican border. If we brought our men home and put them to use along that border, wouldn’t that serve a better purpose for us to have our borders protected. Ron Paul has stated in alot of debates is that when we go overseas to nation build we are making them mad at us for occupying their land. We go over there and tell them how to conduct their business. Just think about how we would feel if some other country did that to us, we would be mad too. Ron Paul would always put our country first if it was attacked, but when we go over there we are going to just keep getting in more and more wars. Do you really want more war so that your mother, brother, father sister, son or dauther can get killed for something that had nothing to do with us? There will always be something wrong in the world over in other countries where they are not getting along so that means we are always going to be in some kind of war all the time. All Ron Paul is saying lets pick our battles carefully. Right now we have because of our wonderful senators and congressmen they just past the Defense Authorization legislation where U.S. soil is considered a battleground every american citizen would be considered a terrorist in the eyes of the gov’t. One day your loved one may not come home because he/she got picked up by someone like FBI, someone from homeland security never to be seen again, because in this legislation that was just past your loved one can be indifinitely detained; you get no counsel, nothing, and only 2 senators voted against that bill and one of them was Rand Paul, and his father Ron Paul is just like him. Ron Paul will not stand for this kind of nonsense. Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich is for this kind of action. I would want Ron Paul in there to get rid of this! Do you really understand americans what is about to take place here in america you better wake-up before they come and hunt us down and take us to interment camps. Ron Paul is the ONLY one who has spoken out against this. If this does not wake you up nothing will. This is the last shot we have of getting the best man in there. There is no candidate, but Ron Paul who completely believes in the Constiution. Newt Gingrich even stated that sometimes the constitution got in the way of getting things done, Oh Really. Neither Newt nor Mitt would sign a pledge for 2nd amendment rights. Is this who you want to run our country? Newt is for cap and trade, and who knows for sure about Mitt Romney he changes his mind so often. Here we have a candidate that runs consistent with the Constitution and you american citizens think he is nutzo. Well I for one think you american citizens are looney for wanting someeone who is going to give us another Obama.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Let’s face it. If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.

        Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.

        Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party

        Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.

        Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.

        Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

        Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

        • USAMYCOUNTRY

          RON PAUL PAYS PEOPLE TO FOLLOW AROUND AND VOTE FOR HIM……..WHEN WE DESPERATELY NEED TO GET OBAMA OUT…….STOP YOUR THREATENING THAT IF SOME ONE ELSE GETS THE NOMINEE….YOU WILL STILL WRITE HIM IN………YOU ARE NOT SINCERE ABOUT TAKING OUR COUNTRY BACK………I THINK THEN THAT YOU ARE A PART OF THE DESTRUTIVE FORCE WE ARE CONTENDING WITH………..KNOCK YOUR SELF OUT FOLKS……

          • 57 girl

            Sadly, if Ron Paul loses the nomination, it won’t really matter because the rest of the Candidates (on both sides of the Isle) will pretty much go along with the ‘establishment’s’ agenda. Research their past voting records. The party divisions are only apparent when the Representatives are in public. Behind closed doors, it is just one big party and as George Carlin put it, we ain’t invited.

          • Al

            At USAMYCOUNTRY;
            He’s never paid me? But then again this sounds more like a fictional excuse from a jealous person to try to discredit someone that actually has passionate supporters.
            And how exactly is supporting the only candidate that is in opposition Big Government, Big Spending and Endless Wars not trying to take the country back?

        • Michael

          Young people. This country is paying for the day that we lowered the voting age to 18. They leave high school indoctrinated to the liberal agenda with no life experience to speak of. The rule of thumb should be 21 unless you are a member of the United States Armed Forces.

          Anyone foolish enough to vote for the campaigner in chief the last time – that would be willing to give him another four years if they don’t get the loon Ron Paul – are not worthy of handing the keys of this country to.

          I would vote for Paul holding my nose, understanding that we have certain checks and balances in place to keep his incompetent side in check.

          • knaughtyknight

            When your children are imprisoned or dead, by your “moderate” Federal government, just watch the Waco film made by Janet Reno, then try to remember all those “loony” reasons that you had for voting against the Constitution and Ron Paul, enjoy all your “entitlements”!!!

        • THOMAS STEWART

          Hey Hey Jason Burns Take Some Deep Breaths, Set-Down Your Obamacare Kool-Aid, And When The GOP Said Mickey Mouse Could Beat “King Obama”, Yikeess, Taken That Statement The Voters Thought After “King Obama” Anyone But Looney Tunes Ron Paul This Is One American That Falls Thru The Cracks, Yikeess, Now All You Ron Paul OWS Followers Back To The Zuccotti Zoo. God Bless America And The Tea Party Patriots.

          • RioSam

            God Bless Ron Paul the Grandfather of the Tea Pary Patriots!

            Ron Paul 2012

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          USAMYCOUNTRY:

          Now you are the conspiracy theorist. Are you serious? You are not going to “take your country back” by voting in someone who is just like Obama. Like I said, if Ron Paul isn’t the nominee, the Republicans don’t have a prayer. By the way, your caps lock is broken.

          Michael:

          I am 36. The troops all support Ron Paul. News Flash: Ron Paul gets more donations from active US military (troops) than all the other Republican candidates combined. Ron Paul gets more donations from the troops than Obama. I support who the troops support.

          http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

          THOMAS STEWART:

          I don’t support Obamacare. Nothing you said in that CrAzY rant made any sense. I can’t respond to nonsense, other than just calling it nonsense. Do you know why the tea party was started? It was to protest TARP. Ron Paul is the only candidate against the bailouts. So God Bless the Tea Party. The true Tea Party. Ron Paul is the grandfather of the Tea Party. We invented this thing before it was hijacked by you Tea-O-Con RINOs.

      • Southerner

        Concerning Ron Paul, I could not agree with you more Michael! The worse thing is even though his followers may have good intention they have adopted the same tactics as the liberals. They rewrite history with partial presentations and obliterate facts and ignore what other people have experienced! Do you people realize what 40 plus years of fanatical teaching has done to Iran? How many of these Ron Paul Supporters have ever been there??? Let me tell you about Iran, and the Iranian people!
        You do not even have to go to Iran to see what I am saying is true! Just go to Los Angeles, California where you will be able to chat with many of the State Department sponsored immigrants who are coming from Iran during the present Administration …yes recruited by our State Department to immigrate to the United States…..As they drool with hatred let them tell you with fanatical hatred how much they hate this nation! Get real people! They were brought here on your tax dollars and living on your tax dollars as well! Recruited by Jihadist Hilary and her gang!
        We are talking about a culture that is so filled with hatred! What kind of people will fight each other to drink the urine of their religious leaders, and to eat their manure and even spread it all over their bodies??? Iran is a country were you can murder you wife in public if she disgraces you or brings shame to you in any way! Yes it is okay as long as you drag her to the street and declare why you are going to beat her, and if she dies well this was by the hand of Allah! And their Religious leaders as well teach and preach openly that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the rightful ruler of the world!!!!! Hey Idiots do you get it!!! They say he is the rightful leader of the World! I guess Ron Paul is either an complete Idiot or an Islamist psychopath! Make you pick either way he is not what America needs!
        Anybody that ignorant and uninformed about who and what he is talking about does not need to be the leader of any nation…Has not Obama demonstrated that enough for us????

        • Michael

          Wow – Amen Southerner! We can only hope and pray that opened an eye or two with this post!

          • Steve

            Southerner, you are painting Iranians with a very broad brush, indicating quite a bias, sir. I am very much a Ron Paul Supporter and I lived in Iran for several years as a child then visited again as part of an official U.S. Navy visit prior to the fall of the Shah. My (American) mother was born in that country and my grandfather served as a Presbyterian missionary there for 44 years. The Iranian people are NOT what we see in their government. It is a known fact (do your homework) that the vast majority of Iranians are pro-US. A number of months ago millions of them took to the streets to protest the re-election of a thugocracy that is completely illegitimate. Obama had the perfect chance to voice his support for that very real revolution but he was (curiously) silent. That people is ready to take their country back, out of the hands of their criminal ruling body, but sanctions and an unprovoked war will open the floodgates of oppression of any dissent and probably result in the jailing and death of thousands, as happened after the fall of the Shah in the 80s.

            Israel has the wherewithal to deal with the threat as they see fit. War needs to be the business of sovereign nations, not NATO or the US as the proxy of the UN. If we need to go to war with ANY nation, including Iran, then let it be debated and declared in Congress, as stipulated in the Constitution. God forbid that we involve ourselves in yet another Middle Eastern war that kills thousands of brave Americans and potentially hundreds of thousands of innocent Iranian citizens because of propaganda that turns out to be misleading in hindsight.

          • Southerner

            Like you said you lived there as a child and before the Islamist Fanatics took completely over! Have you been there since? Do you know what is is like today! So if we go by your assessment we could say Germany was not bad in 1900 I was there! But yet while your are living in 1940 in Nazi Germany trying to compare it by that measure as it was in 1900????? Really great comparison you have there!!! When the Shah was in power it was one of the liberal nations in the region!!! You do your homework you may hoodwink others but your comparison is more than absurd! Out of place out of understanding and with no comprehension! Go to LA and convince those that Hilary is bringing in that they are American lovers!!!! You are out of touch with reality!!!

          • Steve

            Okay, I tried, but your mind is apparently like a rusty steel trap, and you apparently have a low comprehension of what I wrote. I have a deep history with Iran and have followed the fortunes and misfortunes of that country all my life. I was there a second time just before the fall of the Shah.

            Since you refuse to do your own homework I’ll hector you on the key points:
            1) The ruling body is a criminal enterprise speaks loudly but has a very little (military) stick and is politically very weak due to a young populace (majority under the age of 30) that is sick and tired of the repressive rule of the mullahs.
            2) The majority of the populace is pro-West as a result. Do not confuse the people of Iran with their government. Do you not even remember the demonstrations in the streets following their last elections?? If you don’t understand what happened then you sure as hell don’t have a clue what is going on now inside that country.

            I understand that this will be insufficient for your closed mind, but wanted to set the record straight. You just go ahead and continue to follow the mindless propaganda of those who want to sponsor our next major war.

        • blindenoughtosee

          southerner YOU have no knowledge at all you do not even know who you are?You try to rewrite history with your simple mind .You think you know Religion and the history of yourself. This land you call America was a vote by what you call founders ?Founders of what ? The new found land that had inhabitants .Owners of this great Nation ,we call America now because men stole ,killed ,raped, pillaged, put on reservations because they were savages,?This Nation has done nothing but shed blood from the beginning when men voted to call this place America?I was born here but my ancestors and yours and the so called Founders,came here as trespassers, robbers ,thieves, and shed blood . Natives did not agree and was killed like Iraq ,and all other nations we invaded by us.Tell me southerner what was the name of America before men voted to call this land America .You are the one who knows history and religion ?You do not know and you want to be an authority on religion and history?You need to search out a matter before you open your mouth and show us all how unknowledgeable you are?Please tell us what the name of this nation is in the books of religion ?Just because men vote to say 2+2=5 does not make it truth it still equals 4 no matter how many you get to agree with you?Ron Paul knows that and will not compromise that truth for your want of blood shed because you think you are better than poorer nations?We all have our roots from over there and came from over there.Unless you are Native to this land.are you,I know the name of this land before the founders came and voted a name change ,real history , RON PAUL IS TRUTH AND THE ONLY TRUTH WITHOUT COMPROMISE .YOU ONLY KNOW WHAT THE VOTERS TELL YOU AND THAT IS WHAT YOU SPEAK A PUPPET THAT SAYS 2+2=5.

      • Jack Reacher

        The dumbocrats are licking their lips in anticipation of Paul being the candidate. I believe a lot of Paul’s support is coming from dumbocrats in skunks clothing causing the media surge as well as the voting surge.

        If Iowa residents wish to keep any sense of intellect they must reject Mr. Paul on the grounds that he invented the term “Loose Cannon”.

        • 57 girl

          Not to burst your bubble, but I’ve seen quite a few comments from confessed Democrats that have re-registered on the Republican ticket to assure themselves that their vote will count on behalf of Ron Paul. They are smart enough to realize, it is not the party that counts, it is the Candidate running. I welcome any Democrat that has come to their senses and willing to cross those fictitious party lines to join their fellow Americans (forget party) in trying to salvage what is left of our Constitution and our Nation. If we lose our Constitution or our borders, we all lose.

      • Maynard Merrell

        Know better: What makes so many of you people believe that if Ron Paul is elected that the republican vote will go to Obama? For years many of us have had to vote for the lesser of two evils. If Paul is nominated, why would so many republicans suddenly quit voting for the lesser of two evils, and not vote for Paul, who would be better than Obama.. I think that most of you that think that way are nothing but a bunch of Reds, trying to defeat Paul and hope that Obama wins.

        • blindenoughtosee

          Maynard Merrell you are so right our people do not want a lesser of two evils .If they would put petty beliefs behind them and support together one good man who would free them all.We all could have a better nation a more friendly world where people could live .Keep the God they serve in their own country and if its the wrong God and rules just move to the country that has their beliefs .But still respect their beliefs and if they want to convert to some other God or set of rules or laws let them move to wherever.Just have mutual respect one for the other and not obey my ways or else you die.I am a Ron Paul supporter not because of his religion but because he is for all to be free and pursue happiness in a sovereign nation with its own laws and its own God.We know the God this nation had when the founders chose to make it a sovereign nation all others should respect that and not try to change it .Our constitution should be obeyed ,not changed to fit some other nations God or rules of law,and we should not try to change theirs .Like Ron Paul said by freedom to change what the individual wants to serve and obey. The foundation of our country has been undermined to fit or change for all Gods and their rules.It does not work any more like that?

      • RangerWW2

        How can we reply to a post, if the word “reply” is not under it

      • Bert Taylor

        It’s time to wake-up …… !

    • Ron

      I totally agree, and can’t believe there are that many brain dead people in Iowa, that would not see this old geezer as a time bomb, ready to explode at any time. His views on foreign matters is dangerous, and totally out there in left field…

      • guest

        Totally agree with all the above.

        Newt – 2012

        • Ed

          I totally agree!! can’t those idiots see that!!! Ron Paul has no freakin’ chance of defeating Prez Zero next fall I just shake my head in wonder. What scares mke the most about Paul is his foreign policy. He lives in a fantasy world if he thinks the emenies of the US are going to even try and do what he asks. We will be the laughing stock of the world, as if we are not already.

          • jim

            Oh we definitely are, with bozo as pres!

          • Al

            Ron Paul is the man! You bark at his views on foreign policy but have you actually taken the time to listen to his message, or yourself? Is it the place of the free nation of the world to bomb and desecrate other countries because of the views of a few in power stating that “They hate us because we are free!”? And that it has nothing to due with the fact that we kill thousands of their people every year. Is it the more sane choice, to invade more countries under the premise that maybe someday they might be able to attack us and insight more hatred towards us? We’re not the first country to use preemptive war, but then again the United States was never intended to be like a Germany of the 1940s either.
            It’s your right to believe whatever you like and that’s what makes our nation so great. Vote for whoever you feel will support your views. But you shouldn’t write off Dr. Paul so carelessly.

          • Kevin

            I love how all the RP supporters are always saying we haven’t listened enough to his drivel… or haven’t read the constitution, or some other thing that we just don’t understand. Personally to me, it sounds a lot like the liberal elite saying you’re too dumb to understand, so just do this and it will be ok.

            His idea that Iran will just go away and play nice after we pull out of the region is a joke…. Mooscums are all over the earth trying to take over, and he’s going to bury his head in the sand? Just for example, what has Australia done recently to piss these idiots off? Nothing… yet they continue to come in, and demand more and more ‘rights’… where do you think these clowns come from?

            100 years ago if we either left them alone, or blew them off the map then, yes, his policy might make sense today. But with Iran’s 12th Imam clowns in arms reach of a nuke, pretending that they won’t cause Armageddon is just asinine. I’d sooner vote for Trump.

            Sadly, I do believe the man honestly means well and believes in what he thinks. But like Reagan said about liberals, so much of what they know simply isn’t so.

        • richard

          NO! NO! NO! NOT NEWT ,NOT ROMNEY ,NOT PAUL NOT HUNTSMAN

          • T-Texas

            Agreed

          • Carl E. Nell

            Then who?, professor

          • Carmelo Junior

            Michelle Bachmann is what we need to keep North Korea and Iran on check. Paul is a moron isolationsit racist.

            Obama should be laughing his ass to these polls. He would not need to replace idiot Biden.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            AL… you say to listen to his message……………well his message has a few good ideas………BUT…………IT IS THE MESSENGER THAT MAKES ME UNEASY…..!!!! JUST CAN NOT SUPPORT THE MAN

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Newt is a progressive. Talk about brain dead. I hope you are not calling yourself a conservative…

          You must not know what a progressive or conservative is.

          A while back they invented this thing called Google. It’s a search engine. Use it.

        • Al

          At Kevin:
          Your stance on how obviously Mooscums (aka Muslims to the non-racists)are just all inherently evil people because they pray to a different deity and should all be annihilated is a bold stance Kevin… Clearly the United States should eradicate these people off of the face of the earth before they kill us all. Heck, is been nearly a century since the Holocaust, it’s about time we made a sequel! Good call Kevin… I’m sure killing 1000s more will stop them from thinking ill of us…
          But sarcasm aside, the whole “I’m terrified of people living in caves… we should kill them!” thing is getting really old. So I’m with you now buddy, let’s just stay middle east until our country goes bankrupt and try to put end to this whole Muslim fad once and for all…
          Obviously, this is all meant to be sarcastic to make a point…

        • 57 girl

          Kevin, you said . . . “Personally to me, it sounds a lot like the liberal elite saying you’re too dumb to understand.”

          All I can say to that remark is “Hey, if the shoe fits . . . and obviously in your case it does. So tell me Kevin, where are we going to get the money to Police the world with indefinitely?

        • My USA

          Newt in 3012. BO needs to be defeated along with all of the Democratc Socialist. Ron is 76 years old is no match for BO.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            MY USA…… (just kidding you) I KNOW THAT YOU MEANT 2012………if 3012 non of us would care what happened…….!!!!!!right?????

          • Jason Burns

            I’m with you. Newt in 3012! Ron Paul in 2012 because I won’t be here in 1,000 years.

        • Gin

          Oh you establishment wanks! Seriously? Gingrich (He can’t be loyal to his wedding vows, why would you think he would be loyal to the presidential oath?) Romney (the white Obama?) Do not even suggest that you are a defender of our constitution, or that you know one little thing about economics. Anyone reading your comments know that you are both shills posing as republicans.

      • Charles

        I agree with both know better, and Ron, but look what was elected in 08

      • bcecille

        There are many good wise people in Iowa just like all states! The thing is that we cannot believe polls. People in Iowa know better than to think Ron Paul could do anything other than be a spoiler in this race. I believe the agenda behind any poll should be scrutinized. The Democrats are counting on this, all their block votes and dollars from special interest.

        • Jason Burns

          You really don’t realize our level of support do you? I am in Iowa. You don’t have a clue what is going on here. While the Republican polls are saying Ron Paul is winning Iowa, these polls are not counting our independents and third party voters. Not to mention our blue republican crossover voters. Our numbers are greater than you think! Ever heard of a landslide? You will in a few weeks!

      • guest

        Iowa is always out of sync with the rest of the country.
        This vote means very little, wait and see.

        • knaughtyknight

          If you do not vote for Ron Paul, then buy a gun, while you can, for you and your children, as you are going to need it !!!

      • Bob in Boston

        LOL that old Geezer is the only candidate with a foreign policy that matches what the founders said the United States needed in order to survive. friends of all nations, entangling alliances with none.
        Thank god there is Ron Paul to remind us!

        • http://conservativebyte Robert

          Good luck trying to get through to these idiots, Bob. They won’t know the truth until our economy completely collapses and the UN comes in to take over this once proud nation.

        • Andre

          I agree, and those who haven’t read the constitution or can’t grasp the simplicity of it as it was written without all the amendments, will never see that!
          Non intervention is what he speaks about, not isolationism, BIG difference there.
          Unfortunately, Obama has so much money behind him, he may not be able to win an election against the most corrupt WH we have ever had.
          Had Obama been vetted from the start, we wouldn’t be having any of these conversations!!

          • minnie

            Before a person can put his or her name in the head to run for President they need X amount of signatures. I t appears like he had some signatures that were Not legit, so without those he would not have had enough signatures to have his name in the ballot. He was not vetted there was when real corruption started. This is the first time we have ever had corruption to this extend in our White House. What clinton did is nothing compare to zero WHILE being President. Vote Newt in 2012. I really like his foreign policy and replacing judges not giving them a job forever cause the corrupted ones at heart will start showing their true colors soon after.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Newt is a progressive!

            Here, let me Google that for you.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressivism

            If you are too lazy to click the link, let me quote some of the more important parts from the document:

            “Today, most progressive politicians in the United States associate with the Democratic Party or the Green Party of the United States.”

            “The term “progressive” is today often used in place of “liberal.” ”

            “American progressives tend to advocate progressive taxation and oppose the growing influence of corporations. Progressives are in agreement on an international scale with left-liberalism in that they support organized labor and trade unions, they usually wish to introduce a living wage, and they often support the creation of a universal health care system. In the United States, liberals and progressives are often conflated, and in general are the primary voters of the Democratic Party which has a “large tent” policy, combining similar if not congruent ideologies into large voting blocs. Many progressives also support the Green Party or local parties such as the Vermont Progressive Party.”

          • knaughtyknight

            Yes, you would, only you would be saying-Hi C, instead of BO !! lol

        • Charlotte Juett

          It seems that a few of us are starting to get through to the rest of America that there is only candidate in the race that actually believes in our Constitution and has the principles to stand up for it and his oath of office. Ron Paul 2012.

          • 57 girl

            For America’s sake, let’s hope we are getting through. If not, we all lose.

        • http://aol Dennis G.

          Ron Paul is an isolationist. I admire much of what he says about his interpretation of the Constitution and he is right on many points. However, World War II would have never come about had this Nation not been going back in time to it’s isolationist policies after World War I, and our failure to act in the early stages of World War II was fully detrimental to our Nation. Many American military personal died because of our lack of foresight. The world is even much smaller today and even far more dangerous. If Ron Paul’s international policies were to become this Nation’s policies, we would be doomed.

          • Hawkeye

            Ron not an isolationist. He’s a non-interventionist. There’s a very big difference between these philosophies so you’d should study up on it before you make up your mind about Ron Paul. Ignorance is no excuse. As far as our foreign policy during the years leading up to WWII, there were groups w/ varying opinions just like there are today. Germany was a concern to many, just like Iraq and Iran are today. Germans were looked at with suspicion, just like Muslims are today. So to say we would not have had a conflict in Europe if we had seen the signs and acted on what we know happened later is demonstrating ignorance of human nature. The finest medical instrument in the world is the retrospectascope.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron Paul is NOT an Isolationist. Why do some people just repeat the same stupid crap over and over?

            Ron Paul is a non-interventionist. Huge difference!!!

            Please people, get an education!!!!

          • Maynard Merrell

            Dennis G: You don’t know you history. In 1917 two British Fabian Socialist Society founders, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, on an invite to see Pres. Wilson from Wison chief advisor, House, convinced Wilson that if he could get us into WW I, Wilso would be the First president of the One World Government headquarterdat the League Of Nations. The conservatives in Congress, after the war refused to get embroile in Europs problems. Serveral times the League had opportuntities to stop the Axis powers, but did nothing. The fabians again appeard beforWW II and promised Roosevelt that if America would come into the war, he could become the first world president under the United Nations. An embargo here nd an embargo there finally lead to the attack on Peral Harbor. Now whatwere you saying about isolationism. Our Founding Fathers told us not to get involeved with the dipolmisy and politices of foreign nations, but it ws ok to trade with them. We didn’t take their advise.

          • knaughtyknight

            You are doomed !!!

        • ovgrandpa

          obummer wll eat Ron Paul up in a debate guarenteeing him a reelection. If he is so good,and he isn’t,what happen to him the last time he ran? To me he is even a disgrace as a veteran.

          • Maynard Merrell

            ovgrandpa: The debates don’t worry me one bit. If you don’t want Obama, the debates wont mean anything to you. Only to the idiots out there. Paul was defeated in the past because the republicans put candidates before us that were socialist liberals, just as they had been doing for over 50 years, and the voters nominated them every time, just as many of you will do this time around; the Gingrishs, Romneys, and Perrys, because you haven’t learned any better. If you insist on voting for the lesser of two evils, it might as well be Paul. Don’t that make sense?

          • Maynard Merrell

            ovgrandpa: The debates don’t worry me one bit. If you don’t want Obama, the debates wont mean anything to you. Only to the idiots out there. Paul was defeated in the past because the republicans put candidates before us that were socialist liberals, just as they had been doing for over 50 years, and the voters nominated them every time, just as many of you will do this time around; the Gingrishs, Romneys, and Perrys, because you haven’t learned any better. If you insist on voting for the lesser of two evils, it might as well be Paul. Don’t that make sense?

          • knaughtyknight

            Sorry to hear that you have passed your defective genes along to another generation, and really it is too bad what your way of thinking is going to do to your grandchildren !!!

        • Jan

          Ron Paul is probably best buddies with Code Pink and like a fifth-grader would play on the playground with the bullies of Iran, because he naively thinks they will play fair if he just is nice to them. Good grief, when I heard him say one one debate something to the effect that Iran behaves the way it does because the US does “bad” things, I thought somehow Obama had gotten on the GOP debate stage. Paul is so brilliant in some areas that he can’t think clearly in others! Well, if Iowans go with Paul this time around, all I can say is look how they’ve been wrong before!

          • Michael

            So true Jan. If the guy wasn’t so completely naive on dealing with radical Islam, my feeelings would be far different.

      • James Andrews

        Bull-he’s got the best voting record by far of any of the candidates-he defends the Costitution, he’s pro gun rights, he’ll kep us out of wars we shouldn’t get into, his ideas of getting rid of the Federal Reserve are SPOT ON< (they are nothing but a legal counterfeiting organization that has done nothing but damage to America since it's inception), etc. He continuously votes to NOT SPEND MONIES WE DON'T HAVE, etc. etc. He,s the best candidate we've had in thirty years.

        • Mike in PA

          I agree. I have seen Ron Paul described as a nut and looney with crazy ideas but have yet to see any proof….just media parroting. Are we voting with our “feelings” or our “brains”?
          Please take another look and post the facts about Ron Paul’s failures.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Whatever Ron. You make no sense. The non-interventionist candidate is a time bomb ready to explode at any time? Really? You make little sense.

        http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

        • Caped Crusader

          Yup, That non-interventionist crap worked really well for the demofags in the thirties!!!!, Walk out on the Arizona memorial and tell that crap to the sailors still entombed on that ship!!!!, Good point, Jason Burns……..

      • candi

        people in iowa do seem totally out of it… whats wrong with them… they must want obama to win again… geez

    • Goodforalls

      I live in Texas and couldn’t agree with with you more. He is a very dangerous man and has fanatical followers. He is nothing more than a RINO.

      • Charles

        I disagree, he is also a NUT

      • JoJo

        It’s these fanatical type followers that got Obama elected. I don’t know where the people’s brains are, but Paul, Romney and Gingrich are the WORST possible choices.

        • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

          I am one of those middle-of-the -road business type Democrats that voted for and continue to contribute to President Obama and the Democratic Party, the party of the people. It is the party of FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ and Bill Clinton. No party is perfect, and no president can be all things to all people. The Democratic Party has supported progressive issues throughout the 20th Century.

          Both parties have been traditionally centrist capitalist parties of the left and the right. The last 30 years have been seen the rise of two dangerous elements in our society: one the dominance of the wealthy elites, through their corporate leverage and the other, the know-nothing, flat-earth thinkers of Tea Party.

          The second group promulgates myth, rumor and divisiveness through their banal attacks regarding: Birthism, the religion, communism and the baseless canards over the President’s education. We have never seen so many moronic attacks in generations and as long as they are fomented by supporters of the Tea Party and the fundamentalists we will have senseless divisions in our society.

          As to Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, they are all flawed and doomed to failure. Paul is a small-time Congressman who at his age should retire. His ideas on foreign policy, the Federal Reserve and scores of other topics reflects a lack of stability. His only saving grace is consistency, if that means anything.

          As to Gingrich, he is unqualified for any office. He’s morally disqualified, he’s gamed the the government for millions, he’s a hypocrite who criticized Fannie Mae and has taken millions from them, and he was basically thrown out of his GOP leadership role. This, or any site, could not contain the reams of information on his duplicity and hypocrisy. Basically, without mincing words, he’s a faux intellect and a lowlife. Aside from the other nobodies and cuckoos who are running, Mitt Romney has not a wit of principle. He has reversed himself chronically and even he is not sure which position he stands for today on any issue.

          What does that say? It says that the Republican field represents no one. It represents archaic ideas, the 1%, religious crazies, and greed over need. This field insures that President Obama will win in 2012 and his coattails will eliminate the Tea Party. Ironically the Republican Party will be quite happy with their demise.

          • http://aol Dennis G.

            Are you for real? Obama is no Roosevelt or any thing close to any of the past American loving Democratic presidents. He is a destroyer of this Nation and people like you fail to see what is happening. You sir, are a dangerous virus, which has contaminated this Nation. I will vote for the best man no matter what his party. You will always vote for the Democrat even if he is Adolph Hitler. Wise up and smell the the smoke. That is what your liberal brainwashing has done. This Nation is in big trouble and Obama is the fire of destruction.

          • http://tmarcum@yahoo.com Terry Marcum

            Rigarfunkel! I see your still trying to spread the Marxist lie!
            I’ve got to say it again. Oh! You so smart! Must have one of them there college degrees. I bet you have one of them PHDs.

          • RebelRich76

            To RJGarfunkle:
            You cute little socialist/communist you! You love appearing at all these blog gatherings and as you walk in perfect step with your blood brethrens: Marx, Stalin, Morgan, Kuhn, Loeb, Warburg, Bauer-Rothschild, Goldman, Sachs, Soros and the list goes on and on!

          • Reinhold Sommerstedt

            rjgarfunkel says he is a “middle-of-the -road business type Democrat” He admits FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ and Bill Clinton the model leaders of the Democratic Party has supported progressive issues throughout the 20th Century.
            Those of us that love the truth better than the lie – love what Samuel Adams called the “Animating Contest of Freedom recognize that neither party has provided honest leaders but only those that disparage our LAW. This rigarfunkel says he is a “Progressive” and that he is.
            Before Marxist doctrine was called “Communism” Marxist Bolsheviks called their doctrine, “Progressive.” It is this anti-Christian doctrine that has destroyed what made America great. America has ceased to be great because America has ceased to be good. The many here that disparage Ron Paul define the failed character that has emerged in America. These have embraced the doctrine of servitude. They selfishly grasp the neck of their rescuer. The disease is re self-love of narcissism. These that claim the middle of the road are actually hogging the road in order to dominate all others. The Bolshevist claims to be the majority by denial of the existence of all others. They love only the bogus liberty of the Cabala of the Bogus bank of Credit Fraud. They deny that Ron Paul is a True Statesmen that represents The People. Not the LIARS. These selfish PIGS- Parasites In Government Service hate Ron Paul because they hate the truth. We celebrate candidacy of Ron Paul because he has returned the truth to the forum. If these that hate him deny his truth and even if these LIARS seek to kill him we shall not retreat. No, instead we shall advance with ever increasing vigor. Our purpose is to destroy the LIE because we Christians are promised. “You shall know the truth and the truth will make you free.” Should we be denied liberty by peaceful persuasion, we shall achieve Liberty by compelling force. Our enemies defend the synagogue of satan at their peril. We come in peace, our opponents love war. We witness the truth, our opponents love the lie. Peace is better than war. The Truth is better than the Lie. The Cabala of the Bogus Bank of Credit Fraud has failed. END THE FED

          • candi

            democrat party, party of the people… you mean the party of the free handouts… all they care about is your vote… they throw you a crumb and you think, oh they love me, has your lifestyle been so great under dem control… only if you live low and collect freebies… what a joke dems are, and people fall for it… sorry for you, i would hate to live that way.

          • Caped Crusader

            Let’s see now, FDR, Gave us WW2, Truman, Gave us the Korean war, JFK, Gave us the Bay of pigs fiasco and the Cuban missle crisis, LBJ, Gave us the Vietnam war and Slick Willie, Gave us the Somalia fiasco and no doubt the 911 attacks, And oh yes, You left out Jimmy Carter, Wasn’t He was responsible for the Iranian hostage crisis and a destroyed economy, Sure makes me want to vote for the demofags………

          • FireMall

            @ Rigarfunkel

            Much like the OWS’ers claim to represent 99% of Americans ??
            I can’t for the life of me recall voting to support OWS.
            Much like I can’t recall a pollster polling me.
            Reckon there might come a time that Americans “Think” with their brains instead of having groups that they never met speak for them ??
            Imo: Romney is the future reincarnation of Obama. I guess that would suit Obama lovers here just fine , Huh ?
            That’s if they used their own sense of perception instead the MSM’s sense of Deception.
            Gingrich has just as many Socialist skeletons in his portfolio also.
            I don’t understand why folks can’t see they are being played from both sides.
            America has No possibility of regaining her Constitutional Values & Rightful Freedoms when the masses are so massively fooled.
            Romney care == Socialism
            Perry + Gardasil vaccinations + Trans corridor+ Illegal Tuition== Socialism
            Gingrich + Flip flop abortion + Nwo pundit+ Breach of Contract with America + Politician = Socialist
            Nuff Said ????

          • Michael

            Birthism? – it doesn’t matter Obama was born in Hawaii, Kenya or Pluto. The requirement of natural-born citizen is met when a child is born to TWO PARENTS that are citizens of the USA. This issue isn’t even open for debate. It shows just how Constituionally illiterate this country has become – on both sides of the aisle.

          • LannyV

            and your point is?

          • http://advocates-wvox.com rjgarfunkel

            As usual the mud-slingers continue their age old tactic of slander and historical revisionism and divide and conquer. Political discourse, the free-flow of ideas and open-mindedness fall wayside to the base canards conveniently hurled here, that would make Joseph McCarthy blush with shame. Any one who believes in progressive taxation, social safety nets, economic opportunity for all is called a Marxist, a commie rat and every other baseless unsubstantiated insult. There are voters called Yellow-Dog Democrats who would vote for a yellow dog over a Republican, but Adolph Hitler is posed as the example. Perfect metaphor for the clowns that haunt these sites. As if there were any folks here who have an open mind to vote for a Democrat.

            Every contribution here repeats baseless canards about Obama’s origins, faith, education, family life along with racial antipathy. With all that in mind you call yourselves Americans? Every sensible American, if they were aware of the moment by moment contributions here, would be reviled by the slime and lies constantly offered here by flat-earth, flat-tax religious zealots, whose only consistency is intolerance.

            Speaking of Congressman Ron Paul and some of his quotes:

            Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the ‘criminal justice system,’ I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. — Printed In Ron Paul’s Newsletter (but not written by him)

            Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action. — Printed In Ron Paul’s Newsletter (but not written by him)

            The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. On the contrary, our Founders’ political views were strongly informed by their religious beliefs. — Ron Paul

            The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance. — Ron Paul (not by Franklin, Jefferson or Adams)

            Through perverse court decisions and years of cultural indoctrination, the elitist, secular Left has managed to convince many in our nation that religion must be driven from public view. The justification is always that someone, somewhere, might possibly be offended or feel uncomfortable living in the midst of a largely Christian society, so all must yield to the fragile sensibilities of the few. The ultimate goal of the anti-religious elites is to transform America into a completely secular nation, a nation that is legally and culturally biased against Christianity. — Ron Paul

            There is little historical fact in what he has stated, and it reflects a bias and a prejudice that makes him unfit for office.

            As to the concept of the “separation of church and state,” it is often credited to the mind of the British philosopher John Locke, whose influence was keenly felt in the drafting of the United States Constitution. In his social contract, he talked about “a natural right in the liberty of conscience.” This led to the thought that religious freedom was sacrosanct to the individual and that right should be inviolable by any government agency, dictate, or authority. Under our Constitution the treatment of religion is divided into two clauses: the “establishment clause,” and the “free exercise clause.” With regards to “free exercise,” the treatment of religious practice should not be impinged on by government, unless there is a clear violation of state law. Basically the courts have insured that important religious rights are not impeded and they usually demand that any state laws restricting religious practices must show that the state has a valid interest in protecting citizens from being bodily violated.

            The American people will never accept flat-earth theocrats determining their religious future and boundaries by their view of the scriptures. For sure, at the present time, the Republican field has become a captive of this type of thinking. After the 2012 Goldwater Disaster that they will inflict on themselves, the problem and the people who promote those views, will thankfully be put to bed and their promoters will go back to being under the rocks and back into the intellectual caves from whence they came.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          No, choosing a warmonger like McCain is how Obama was elected. You are on the right path to have him elected again.

          If Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, have fun with Obama for another four years. You have been warned!

          If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.
          Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.
          Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party
          Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.
          Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.
          Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

          Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        What does living in Texas have to do with anything? Ron Paul has won in Texas multiple times. He must be doing something right.

        A RINO? Really? (Republican In Name Only) You must be talking about Gingrich, Perry, or Romney.

        Ron Paul is the most conservative candidate running. He has more conservatism in his pinky toe than all the other candidates combined.

        Ron Paul’s plan to restore America cuts One Trillion dollars the first year. He plans to balance the budget by year three. Tell me who else is this serious about cutting spending? He wants to decrease the size of the Federal government and restore a sound currency. This is the Republican way. Calling Ron Paul a RINO is like calling Gingrich a conservative or calling Romney consistent. It’s just a flat out lie.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns
          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            RJ CARBUNCLE ……… ….. HAS FINALLY TOLD US WHAT HE REALLY IS……….YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A LIBERAL…OBAMA HUGGING IDIOT……YOU HAVE BEEN WRITING TERRIBLE THINGS ABOUT THESE OTHER PEOPLES POSTS .AND YOU NEED TO STAY THE H—OFF OF HERE AND FIND SOME PLACE ELSE TO SPEW YOUR INSULTS AND MARXIST IDEAS……YOU ARE WHAT &WHO THAT HAS HELPED DESTROY US…….. TO THE REST OF YOU POSTING…….TELL THIS S.O.B. TO CRAWL BACK UNDER HIS ROCK!!!!!!

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Hey USAMYCOUNTRY:

            YOUR CAPS LOCK IS BROKEN!

        • Sonja

          Sorry, Ron Paul has many good ideas, but with exception to our “protecting our country”. We wouldn’t need to worry about the economy with Ron Paul as President as our Country would no longer exist, it would be wiped off the face of the map by our Muslim enemies with Paul as President. People need to wake up, the Muslim countries for centuries have vowed to “take over” & destroy Israel & America, that will not stop but be worse with Paul as President with his “naive” views on the Muslim Countries.

        • Michael

          I’ll go off the board and take Paul Ryan any day. A trillion dollars out of 15 trillion plus how much unfunded liability?

      • Joan B

        Fanatical is putting Paul’s beliefs kindly !
        Joan

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          I would choose a better word for Paul’s beliefs…

          American

    • Homer Carnes

      And that is the truth Brother. He is a disaster on the way to a wreck.

    • Nita

      neither does Paul stand a chance…

      Nita

    • Dennis

      Given that we spent over $800,000,000,000 to depose the Iraqui dictator (that we supported earlier to protect oil interests from an Iranian regime that we also set-up but then later failed), I’d say I have to agree with Ron Paul on foreign policy. If America “needs” to sent troops overseas, then let Americans send a message to the Executive Branch via their elected Representatives and Senators. Meanwhile, we could need a President that will allow cooler heads to prevail, cut the deficit, preserve personal liberties, and restore our economy. I’ve had enough of welfare and warfare. Go Ron Paul! (And watch him take ground in South Carolina after he wins Iowa).

      • Roxanna

        You, I and thousands of others stand with one that doesn’t flip flop depending on who he talks with. Stood on the principles of OUR Constitution, has voted ALWAYS for the liberties and freedoms of the American Citizen. Has more contributions coming in by the day because he speaks truth, doesn’t white wash it and hope for approval. I could care less about the people who HAVE to spew ignorance because they follow the lame stream media. We are strong and mounting in numbers. When Dr. Paul DOES become President, whether you choose to vote for him or hand the Presidency over to Obama, THAT will be on your head. Dr. Paul receives more money from the federal employees than ANY other Republican candidate, he receives more money from the GRASSROOTS citizens, all candidates combined don’t surpass his donations from our troops. Yet you still spew your ignorance….DO YOUR RESEARCH, become MORE educated and enlightened on what is going on around you!!! RON PAUL 2012 FOR SURE!!!!

        • UMP13

          Very true Roxanna!!
          Dr.Ron Paul has such a SPOT ON stance on foreign and domestic policies.
          I am retired ARMY with 6 TOD’s in southwest Asia and I/WE support Dr.Paul for the presidency.
          Too many people judge the book by the cover and have never really looked into Dr.Paul’s view’s…Dr.Paul is not an isolationist,North Korea is…BIG difference!!!!!!

        • William

          Finally someone with the intelligence to understand what it takes to make an informed decission. Instead of one that has thier head in the sand. Look at your favorites voting record on issues you care strongly about and then make a choice based on that not on some BS from the media or someone elses blog.

      • http://conservativebyte Robert

        I’m with you, Dennis. America first!

      • Alex S

        OK, we spent that money to 86 Hussein. What’s the matter with recouping our expenditure, plus, from Iraq, via oil? Payment for that, and our involvement in Syria (agreement on payment BEFORE our involvement), would have covered our loss with Soylanda, etc.

      • jaydee

        Agree! All my adult life, we’ve been throwing away American blood and dollars on jihadist freaks who only wish to blow us off the map. WHY ?? Its breaking our economy !!! I say bring the troops home, and put them on the southern border to clean up that mess w the cartel, which would certainly improve “life” inside the USA. Also, Ron Paul is the only one of all the candidates running whom I TRUST NOT to disarm Americans. If we are disarmed, then we are helpless and any tyrant who wishes to, be he our own leader, or a foreign Islamic leader, can KILL us !!! All the other candidates either support gun control, or, are hesitant to take a stand and have been wishy washy on that subject. The UN wants to take us down via the Small Weapons Treaty (thankx to Hillary and Soros) making us “subjects” to the UN. RON PAUL WANTS TO PULL US OUT OF THE UN !!!! That right there is good for my vote !!!! If not stopped, the UN will totally destroy the soverignty of this nation. You can call it isolationism, or whatever you want, but if we dont’ tweak our “common good” thinking, we as a nation are doomed.

        • 57 girl

          Agree! All my adult life, we’ve been throwing away American blood and dollars on jihadist freaks who only wish to blow us off the map. WHY ??
          ************
          Do you really want to know? Watch and learn . . .

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo&feature=digest_thu

        • Fernande Picard

          Right on… America first.

      • Sonja

        Having a “good” economy won’t be “good” if we have a President that doesn’t see fit to protect us from our “enemies” the Muslim countries like Iran, etc. Their goal has been for centuries is to destroy Israel, Jewish people & America, this is their belief from their so called “god”.

      • candi

        ron paul is a fool…

        • Al

          At Candi;
          You call Ron Paul a fool? But yet, support Newt? lol… Seriously, Ron Paul is probably the most educated person on the stage.

      • Southerner

        I guess you Ron Paul supporters want to fight terrorist in the streets of the United States???

        • Al

          At Southerner;
          No that’s why we have the Patriot Act… Duh! Nothing keeps us safer at home than having our forces overseas and giving up our rights…

        • Mike in PA

          At least we’ll still have our guns!

        • blindenoughtosee

          Southerner I have never seen a terrorist on our soil that we have not made by our foreign policy.Keep your nose out of peoples business and they will keep theirs out of yours.Force your ways and beliefs on them and they will ask who do you think you are God?Who made you ruler over us ,then anger sets in and you get in a fight ,people die ,people get wounded.I would like to ask you a question ?When we pulled Saddam out of the hole why did we not water board him to get the information ? He was the only one that knew where all those weapons were?Why did we torture little soldiers who knew nothing? Why did we let the so called head man die without questioning him? Where is the real pictures of Osama Bin Laden why not show your trophy off for all to see.like Gaddafi pictures .Why bury him at sea like it was a act of respect for our 9-11 murderer ?may be that he was working for our C.I.A. and trained by our foreign policy makers?when Russia was there at war and we used them as pawns to get rid of the Russians? Russia has nukes why not strike them ?They don:t like Israel and would destroy them?

    • Edward Levy

      I could NEVER vote for Ron Paul, even against Obama.
      I am an INDEPENDENT. With NO pace to go. ALAS

      I wish that there was a strong 3rd party candidate, but that would only take away
      from the GOP candidate
      We saw what a 3rd party candidate did here in NC. We wound up with Bev Purdue
      because that candidate split the Republican vote

      • JoJo

        I’d plug my nose and vote for Paul, but I would also make certain that I was voting for SANE, Constitutional minded people for the senate and house to create balance. I would NEVER, EVER vote for Obama. This is exactly what the progressives want.

      • T-Texas

        Please reconsider about your vote and vote for anyone running against opileofsheet.I would like to think people are a lot better educated now,

      • Ron

        You are correct, and Governor Perdue is a total joke, even worse than Mike Easley was, which half of his administration is now in Federal prison. She is just as, if not more corrupt.

        • jaydee

          NC has always been “sold out” …. like a historical curse of some sort … ‘:-(

        • candi

          yes, bev purdue needs to go… shes horrible.

      • William

        As an independent you can go any pace ( place ) you choose.

      • 57 girl

        It is sad that you are so brainwashed by party divisions that you can’t think for yourself or stand with the rest of the Nation to put an honest President in office (regardless of party affiliation). That’s kinda like voting for Candidate A because you don’t want Candidate B to win even though you really like Candidate C. Why not just vote for Candidate C and give him/her the chance to win? Baaaah, go back to grazing.

      • blindenoughtosee

        Edward Levy It sounds like you like the status quo, keep killing ,keep spending ,keep wars, keep liars in office spend our youths future ,keep fema camps ,keep indefinite detention with out trial ,keep TSA pat downs or naked body scans of your children and grandmothers .Do not vote for Ron Paul and that is what will remain in our nation and worse .Store seven days of food you are a terrorist .Speak up for the constitution and your rights you are a terrorist .Do not pay for health care and go to jail.To old to benefit society do not cover under health care .This is what you get if Ron Paul is not elected .The FEDERAL RESERVE will continue to rob ,steal,your future.You get a raise on your job the FED. raises interest rates so you stay as poor as you always were.

    • Patriot 101

      I’m from Iowa and I’m voting RON PAUL. I am probably not who you think I am. I am fiscially conservative, socially conservative. I don’t make a lot of money, and I’m a single father taking advantage of food stamps and other “govt. programs”. I have my own business that has been devastated by the economy. I’m still in business, but technically “broke” or bankrupt, just haven’t given up yet. I have had my own business for many years. I’d like to remain in business, but the freedom to do so is going away.
      I used to be a Republican, but I have discovered that I’m really more Libertarain than anything else, as the Republicans seem to be “Big Government” too, just more interventionist, military industrieal complex big govt.
      The “establishment” Republicans are all for war with Iran. Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Bachmann have all vowed that Iran will not achive or have a nuke if they are president. Are they gong to ask them “Pretty Please” to give up their nuke ambitions? NO, it will be bombing. Bombing another country is war.

      • Michael

        Patriot – it unrealistic to believe that Iran will not use a WMD against Israel first, then ultimately against US interests. You cannot pacify those bent on globalization of Sharia Law. Just like medicine and vehicle maintenance – prevention is the best cure for the disease. We cannot allow ourselves to return to the pre-911 mindset. The minute we fall asleep at teh switch – it will happen again on a mass scale.

        • Big Ugly, Wyoming

          …… and if Iran does bomb Israel – turn the entire country into a glass bowl.
          Until then, what gives you the right, or anyone else for that matter, to dictate what they may, or may not, have.
          We have them, but no one else is supposed to??

          Bombing Iran because they ‘might’ use them is no different than arresting you because you have a penis and ‘might’ commit rape, or arresting you and putting you under ‘indefinite detention’ because you have guns and ‘might’ attempt to assassinate Obama.

          There ain’t no “Department of Pre-Crime”.

          • Michael

            Big Ugly – you are living in pre-911 denial. How many more attacks on American soil are you willing to put up with? Do you go the doctor for a check-up? Do you go to the dentist to get your teeth cleaned? Do you take your car in for an oil change or do you wait for the engine to blow? The more we can do to prevent terrorism and protect ourselves and our allies – the less costly it will be in the end.

          • Southerner

            Big Ugly you need to add “and completely ignorant” to your writing name! You are so ignorant I will address this issue for the benefit of others and not you! YOU CAN’T FIX STUPID!!!
            What has Israel done to assist the United States? (Just recent events)
            1. During the Clinton administration the Israeli Intelligence warned the United States 32 times that they were in danger of an terrorist attack involving the use of Aircraft. While naming 4 of the people involved as well with the recommendation to check flight schools and such.
            2. They continued on four other warnings during the Bush Administration. To no result….and guess what? 9/11 occurred.
            3. When the US Military went into “Operation Desert Storm” they had only 4 interpreters who could speak Arabic in the accent of the Iraqi’s ( For those of you who do not realize this the accent of each region differ in that part of the world and if you cannot mimic it with perfection it will not work.) So where did the United States Military acquire people who could do this???? Israel volunteered their Intelligence service who had plenty of people comprising the most success counterintelligence team in history and confounded all of the Iraqi communication saving thousands of US military lives!
            4. Also during “Operation Desert Storm” Israel allowed the stationing of missile batteries for the protective measure to insure that Iraq could not utilize nor would utilize any weapons that would be able to cause mass destruction to the US military positions in Iraq. In fact three Israeli Air Force wings were kept on 24 hour alert for scramble to launch in case they would be needed to intervene until the US Military could set up proper coverage.

            Don’t even go to the place of defending the Palestinians! Big Ugly your ignorance proceeds you greatly! Any body who thinks Terrorist are unfortunate, and that Iran can be negotiated with is way off the scale of sanity or commonsense!

          • Al

            At Big Ugly, Wyoming;
            lol! That’s AWESOME! I agree!

        • Dave

          Israel has 300 nuclear weapons.

          • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

            Yes, and they have shown very great restraint, in NOT using one on Iran. Why? Attitude. Attitude is what should be the determining factor on whether a country is “allowed” to posess nukes! With the “wipe Israel off thr face of the earth” attitude of Iran, they should NOT be allowed, by the world community to posess nukes, EVEN IF THAT MEANS NUKING THEM FIRST TO PREVENT IT! A “first strike” against Iran, would actually be a defensive tactic! Iran MUST NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BE ALLOWED TO POSESS ANY NUKES, PERIOD!

          • Southerner

            Where did you get that from…Ron Paul’s Iranian Intelligence source???

        • http://conservativebyte Robert

          Iran is only trying to complete one bomb. If they are stupid enough to do so, Israel will wipe them off the map with their arsenal. We don’t need to get involved. We already support Israel to the tune of $8,000,000 a day. That is quite enough support from us!

          • Southerner

            Robert unlike the support the United States gives to other countries. Both Israel and Taiwan support the United States in many ways. Just the intelligence would require a larger amount of money if the United States had to support an intelligence group t acquire the same amount of intelligence. The United States get on an constant basis real time intelligence for matters on every country in the Middle East and Gulf States. Just for the record this has over the years saved countless American lives! The fact be known the internal intelligence in Iran that the United States depends on is rendered by Israeli sources! Unlike the countries like this Administration chooses to support! The trillions of dollars that the Obama administration will not only never save an American life but the same money they are giving away and to whom may very well cost many many American lives!

        • Ron

          Iran is without a doubt, the most dangerous nation on the planet, and has been since 1977 when they took 50 US hostages, and the looney President Carter let them stay imprisoned for 444 days, with no backbone, and no respect or fear from Iran, to let them go free, until Reagan went into office… They have either killed or sponsored killing our soldiers in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Who of you Ron Paul backers don’t get this????? They are evil, plain and simple, and Ron Paul would sit down and say “pretty please, don’t bomb us”??? Get real..

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron,

            Why did they take the hostages? Were these people just born evil? Does any of this make any logical sense? Maybe you should tell the whole story… or maybe you didn’t know…

            http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

          • jaydee

            Last time I checked it was up to Congress to declare war. If we do our job, and also elect SANE congressional leaders, then we shouldnt have to worry about this. My humble opinion is that that having troops on the ground inside these Islamic states is a waste. I clearly rem. the air strikes that we delivered during the Gulf War. I fully support a powerful air force and navy, and all branches of the military. What Ive become is dead-set AGAINST sending is sending the ground troops into these evil regions, and just leaving them !!! Im fully aware that Iran is more dangerous than any other nation, b/c they have a MADDD MAN at the helm. I have no hesitations about “dropping the big one on them” if need be. But Im sick of seeing out guys sacrificed on the ground. I want them out of Afghanistan, and do not support sending them into any more long drawn out “iraqi” type situations, where the minute we pull out, the situation there will most likely revert right back to the jihadist environment that it was before we went in. That makes no sense to me. If I could see long term improvement inside those nations due to our presence, I might think differently. But Im not seeing it.

          • Caped Crusader

            Right on Ron!!!!!, And now they are holding our aircraft hostage!, Come on jimmy carter junior and make an effort of somekind to retreive our aircraft……

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            RON……and obama said to iran……..PRETTY PLEASE……SEND OUR DRONE BACK……!!!!!!

          • Al

            At Ron;
            “Iran is without a doubt, the most dangerous nation on the planet”… Really? Have you watched the news lately? I love my country but our foreign policy that encourages preemptive strikes and our vast military clearly makes us the most dangerous nation on the planet…
            It’s people who are scared of the boogie man like you that have allowed these wars to continue.

        • Southerner

          Michael….You have to understand the Ron Paul…think that being a Constitutional supporter is to think you actually live in 1782! While they completely forget that we went back to war just 30 years after that and we were no so prepared and America learned a lesson that these Idiots have already forgotten again!
          Like liberals they will only understand the things we are trying to express to them when the terrorist or the nuclear weapon will land in their yard!

      • sbangred

        For purely economic reasons Paul would be a good choice. He get’s the danger of the Federal Reserve. On the other hand is foreign policy would be a disaster for America. What good would a good economic policy be if America was washed off the face of the map because of dangerous foreign policies? There must be a balance!

      • Ron

        It’s people like that will put that jerk we call a president back in office again. Ron Paul is a jerk of jerks. He doesn’t have brains enough to operate a cat house. (thats a whore house ) Cai could of beaten him but someone drug the trash out of the city dump. Bauchman can beat him if people weren’t so set against a women for president. I loss my business since that clown took office and I’m not on welfare or food stamps and I’ll make it because I beleive. We need to thinking of saving AMERICA.

        • wireline

          he had enough brains to deliver over 4,000 babies, probably a lot more than you could ever do. Where do you think Ron Paul stands on abortion? If you support Gingrich, Romney or any of their ilk then you must like what you been getting because you will be voting for MORE of the SAME, if you wanted to see real change then you would vote for Dr. Paul. How about we try the Constitution for a real change

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          It has nothing to do with being set against a woman president… Just like it has (had) nothing to do with race in ’08. I am tired of all this nonsense about race and sex. It has to do with principal, or a lack of.

          Here is the problem. Bachmann is a compulsive liar. She has lied and lied and told lies to cover lies. She cannot be trusted.

          Romney has no core values. He flips and flops on every issue, even the important ones like tarp and abortion.

          Gingrich is a progressive and a flip flopper. He cannot be trusted. If you vote for Gingrich over Obama, I would have to wonder if you were a little racist because they are basically the same person. (if you look at their history and not the lies they tell)

          Ron Paul has voted consistently. He has a perfect voting record. He has said the same thing for over 30 years. He doesn’t change his message to get votes or bow down to the special interest groups or lobbyists. He wants to restore the constitution and our liberties. He wants to defend our country (put America first) instead of guarding the borders between Iraq and Afghanistan. He understands that wars affect families and innocent civilians and they are bankrupting this country. He knows that given the effects of war on innocent people (women and children) and families, we should go to war cautiously and only after diplomatic approaches fail, unless we are in imminent danger. How many lives have we lost in these recent wars against people who did not attack us? (Iraq) How many did we lose in 9/11? I think the wars have hurt our economy and American families more than 9/11 and even after 9/11, we went to war in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

          If you people can’t understand this, you are all fools.

      • UMP13

        God bless you Patriot 101…hang in there my friend

      • Sonja

        With that attitude, Obama is sure to win, Paul will be helping what Obama started with allowing our enemies to “destroy” our country by not protecting it from our “enemies”. People need to wake up to “why” the Muslims in the Muslim countries are vowed to destroy us & Israel. Pauls ideas “will not” make the Muslims change their vow to destroy us, don’t be so naive. Read up on why “they” want us destroyed & they always will & will not stop. They are our enemies period & our President needs to protect our country period.

      • candi

        you are a fool… ron paul wont win anything, if he wins in iowa its a joke. he is as boring as watching paint dry… please…

        • 57 girl

          Better bored and free than fed an elegant line of BS as our remaining rights get flushed down the toilet. What exactly is it about our Constitution that bores you Candi?

      • traitors in gov

        Not true.. we are not going to start the war,, just clear the way for Israel to bomb the Muhammed out of Iran…Will this be the final war until Jesus comes??? Or will Jesus come before the war??

        either way, Paul will stand aside and let Iran kill whomever they please with a Nuke…No, we need to stand with Israel if it does happen…

        If and only if Paul wins the bid, I will vote for him,,, due to not wanting communism to come here and stay….

        Power to the people of the constitution of the United States of America.

        I didn’t serve, but stood in the same room and took the same OATH TO MY COUNTRY>>…anything Foreign OR Domestic my brothers

        • Jason Burns

          Ron Paul would step asside and let Israel attack Iran. You left that part out.

      • EthanolRules

        Good work! Throw your vote away! Nice. Ron Paul is a LIBERTARIAN- understand that a LIBERTARIAN is as far from a CONSERVATIVE as
        a COMMUNIST is. STOP with this ridiculous Ron Paul bull already.

        • Jason Burns

          You are joking right? Either buy a dictionary or learn to Google. You havn’t got a clue what you are talking about!

          Ron Paul is a conservative. In fact, he is the ONLY conservative running. Nobody else is serious about cutting spending or shrinking the size of government.

    • http://msn.com Tim K

      You must get your info from the obama news outlets which is all of them with fox being there with them. too bad there is so many out and out IDIOTS like you out there and you say or act like your saving America what a bunch of dumb Asses.

      • richard

        TIM, I AGREE it’s not the candidates it’s the voters

      • Lonnie W. Lynch

        Tim K. Yours is the only post that I have seen here that makes any sense what so ever.. For more than a week now FOX and the democrats have been trying to blow Newt Gingrich away. It has been an all out assault on him and then people sit back and wonder why… I think maybe a thrill must be running up Krauthammers leg when the name Mitt is mentioned !!!

        • candi

          i cant stand romney… i really want newt, this country has become a joke…

          • Al

            Apparently, you’re not the only woman that wants Newt…

        • Annie

          Seems Fox has begun a promotion for Romney (a wishy, washy politician) and an assault on Gingrich, the best qualified, intelligent, quick thinker, with knowledge of all areas that Washington and a president must deal with along with a record of making changes even while Democrats were in control. He gives a feeling of strength, understnding and determination to get America back on track.

      • James

        Sure thing. You morons did a great job with the last election. Ron Paul 2012.

        • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

          RON PAUL, …………………………. NEVER!

          EVER………………………………..

          NEVER, EVER…………………………………

          OH GOD, SAVE US FROM RON PAUL!!!

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            Ron Paul 2012!

            Restore America Now!

          • traitors in gov

            No, God save us from OBAMA

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Yes, great job in ’08! You guys got what you deserve picking a warmonger like McCain. If you don’t pick Ron Paul this time around, I am afraid you are going to get Obama again in ’12.

          • candi

            you mean if you do pick him you will get obama again… no to ron paul….

          • Jason Burns

            No, that is not what I said.

          • blindenoughtosee

            Jason Burns You are right McCain was the one that just implemented the INDEFINITE DETENTION BILL ON AMERICANS. NO TRIAL?use military to kick down your door haul you off to F.E.M.A. CAMP. run by haliburton Cheney K.B.R. I WONDER HOW MANY OF THE REPUBS. INVESTED IN THAT COMPANY.?

    • B Gilbert

      Dittos to that!

      • B Gilbert

        Michael.

    • Rubin

      If ignorance is a blessing then you are well blessed! Ron Paul is the only one that can beat Obama. Reasoning is that Democrates will flip the scrip, Seniors, Young people will only vote for Ron Paul, Not these other Pigeons! Newt would be a disaster for the conservitives! Romney holds no clout it would be a dead issue and the Hitler puppet would contine…. Vote for Ron Paul or prepare for the next Great Depression

      • Michael

        Rubin – Ron Paul has zero chance of defeating the zero in the White House. God help us all if he does – as his foreign policy will prove deadly to Jews, Christians and at some point ALL Americans. While I appluad most of his economic policy – the best prevention is a strong national defense. We can’t return to the pre-911 mindset that defines Paul’s foreign policy.

        • Gary

          You’re nuts!! He’s the only one with the savvy to win the election!

          • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

            GARY, YOU’RE THE NUTTY ONE! Ron Paul will do great in Iowa, then slide into oblivion after that. That has been my prediction, long before this poll came out. Paul is a “serial candidate for President”. His 4th try will be in 2016, and 5th try in 2020. Hopefully by 2024, he’ll be “in the home for the senile”. (which is where he really belongs today) All you Ron Paul supporters, your boy is not going to win, no matter how frikkin obnoxious you get on these discussion boards! HE WILL FADE AFTER IOWA! Get used to it. Get over it!

          • Sonja

            If Ron Paul wins, the muslim countries will “with his help” be able to destroy our country & Israel. That has been their goal for centuries to destroy “infidels” as they put it. Don’t be so naive about Iran or the other muslim countries, read up on “why” they believe we should be destroyed.

          • Jason Burns

            You neocons are fools. Ron Paul is the ONLY one who can beat Obama! Keep it up, like four years ago, your McCain neocon warmonger pick will lose again! You guys are making your own bed, and mark my words, if you repeat what you did four years ago, you will lose again. The young voters will not vote for a warmonger. So go ahead, keep it up.

        • Roxanna

          AGAIN, DO YOUR RESEARCH….there are stanch Democrats, in charge of committees that are changing to RON PAUL. After years of voting Democrat, they have now switched parties to vote for Dr. Paul. Not just in New Hampshire, BUT all over THIS NATION. There are Australians, British, Germans, people allll over the world who are supporting RON PAUL…..because he is the ONLY ONE that represents OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS, RIGHTS, AND LIBERTIES. From my conversations, they DO NOT want the United States of America to stop being the strong Nation that it has been for hundreds of years. OUR CONSTITUTION is what has built this nation to be strong, land of the free, home of the brave. Our
          men and women have fought and died to keep us free and you SIT THERE spewing ignorance…..BUT THATS YOUR RIGHT! And I just voiced mine!! RON PAUL 2012

          • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

            The reason, AND ONLY REASON a democrat would “change” and support Ron Paul, is because they realize that Ron Paul is by far, the absolutely weakest candidate Obama could face in the general election, and by facing the weakest, Obama might “squeak in” for another 4 years! THAT is the ONLY reason a democrat would support this crazy nutbasket and fruitcake!

          • Sonja

            Naive, so naive, alot of good it won’t be just to have our Constitution followed without protecting our country from our enemies like Iran, North Korea, & Mexico, etc. Just having a good economy will not protect us from our enemies. Obama has already opened the door to our enemies, Ron Paul would finish it allowing them more power to destroy us & Israel. With our enemies knowing there is a President that will “leave them alone” you can count on our enemies taking advantage of that to continue their “goal” to destroy, as they call us, “infidels”.

        • UMP13

          Michael my boy,
          you could not be any farther from the truth!
          Dr.Paul is very electable and is the only one that WOULD take down Obama.

          There should be a new party,to be headed by Dr.Paul and other intelligent AMERICAN’S…The Reality Party!!!

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          The polls are all saying that Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama. Who do I trust? You… or the polls?

          I think I will take my chances with the polls.

          Ron Paul 2012!

        • blindenoughtosee

          Michael I do not need to go to another town or a neighbors house to protect my home , that is why we have technology, radar ,spy satellites,. to see what is happening around us .If that stuff does not work why blow all that money on it.I can protect my home from invaders if I am there,if I am gone they can enter without resistance from the owner.We need the owners home so they can protect what they own .OUR TROOPS .UNITED WE STAND ,DIVIDED WE FAIL ,THEN WE FALL, Let technology do what it was made to do and if not get rid of the junk for good ,why pay for something that does not work and say we are smart .Your technology should have made you safe without sending your troops away from home to protect the home front.Our borders are crossed every day ,those troops could be here protecting them,spending their money here instead of helping all the enemies economies as was just stated in our news paying 15 dollars a gallon for fuel.

      • wireline

        Rubin they must like what they been getting, because they seem to be willing to vote for more of the same with either Gingrich or Romney. If they wanted REAL change then they could understand where Dr. Paul is coming from. How about trying the Constitution for REAL change. The RINO’s have been selling us all down the river long ago.

        • Sonja

          lmao, such fools. Alot of good it would be to have Paul as President, one who you state would follow our Constitution, but not protect us from our enemies like Iran etc. With him as President, if he was allowed to follow through with his thinking about our enemies, our country along with Israel would be destroyed by our enemies as to our enemies their goal has been for centuries to destroy “infidels” which they refer to as us & Israel, all Christians. So naive of people to think for one second they will ever not follow their vow to their “god” if we do not protect our country from them. Obama has already opened the door, Ron Paul will push our enemies in the door.

      • Carmelo Junior

        Obama is very happy. He wants the GOP to nominate any of these boring old white asses.

      • candi

        ron paul in a debate with obama would just stand there and look stupid, like he always does. the man can hardly speak… he needs to go back to delivering babies, where he does not need any personality/

        • 57 girl

          Candi, just because you don’t know how to listen does not mean Ron Paul does not know how to speak. If you would actually listen to what he is saying, you’d probably realize that Ron Paul is the most intelligent Candidate running. As far a debating Obama (with or without his teleprompter), Ron Paul would run circles around him. Ron Paul knows what is in our Constitution from start to finish. Given Obama’s actions since he has been in office, I doubt Obama could say the same, or perhaps Obama just doesn’t have enough respect for our Constitution to abide by it. Either way Dr.Paul would put our current President to shame.

    • jimmyg

      Totally agree…Paul would be the worst possible choice to defeat Obummer.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Well then you would be wrong. The polls say otherwise.

        • Sonja

          Well, look at the traitor many voters put in the Whitehouse the last time, just shows how feebleminded many voters are.

    • Dave

      Pusillanimous‏ Gingrich’s Chickenhawk Military Record

      http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/ron-paul-goes-after-gingrichs-military-record.php

      “Student? Married? Father? No excuse. My brother was married and father when he went to Viet Nam. He was my only brother. He recently died of complications from Agent Orange. Gringrich is just like all the neocon politicians in Washington and their draft dodger supports. Let somebody else fight in wars, because they have better things to do with their lives. Romney skipped off to Paris to find himself.” Dorothy Banks

      I served. And my brother served in Vietnam on the river boats. I took care of him the last fourteen years of his life. He too died recently due to complications from being there. Newt Gingrich is a chicken hawk who has sucked the blood and marrow out of America and Americans for too long.

      • Ron

        I’m with you. I also served on swift boats in Vietnam. I can see that you care and we need a lot more like us and other veterans. Go Navy

    • Janet

      @ Michael…You are SO right. If he gets this nomination Obama will be in the W.H. another 4 years. Paul is very scary with his foreign policy. He said he hoped he could make it through the primaries meaning his physical strength. If he is concerned to make it through primaries how in the world will he make it through 4 years of tough Presidency especially dealing with the big mess Obama will leave. Scary!

      • Gary

        Ron Paul is very good on foreign policy! You need to do some more research on the matter. Are you going to vote for a War Hawk? Every other candidate is for more wars. It’s time to rethink that mentality and start protecting our own borders instead of those of foreigners! Ron Paul’s policies are in line with the Constitution and the Founding Fathers! All of the other candidates, Not So Much!

        • Roxanna

          GO RON PAUL 2012

          • Sonja

            Right, “go away”, we do not want our country destroyed by our enemies with another President who thinks we should just sit back & allow our enemies to “subdue” us.

          • USAMYCOUNTRY

            roxanne……..yeah……GO AWAY DR. PAUL……WHERE ALL GOOD DR’S GO …..INTO RETIREMENT!!! we are sure in a fix……the president wants to sweet talk the enemy……….and paul wants to ignore them………MAN I FEEL REALLY SAFE!!!!!!!!!!

        • Southerner

          Concerning Ron Paul, I could not agree with you more Michael! The worse thing is even though his followers may have good intention they have adopted the same tactics as the liberals. They rewrite history with partial presentations and obliterate facts and ignore what other people have experienced! Do you people realize what 40 plus years of fanatical teaching has done to Iran? How many of these Ron Paul Supporters have ever been there??? Let me tell you about Iran, and the Iranian people!
          You do not even have to go to Iran to see what I am saying is true! Just go to Los Angeles, California where you will be able to chat with many of the State Department sponsored immigrants who are coming from Iran during the present Administration …yes recruited by our State Department to immigrate to the United States…..As they drool with hatred let them tell you with fanatical hatred how much they hate this nation! Get real people! They were brought here on your tax dollars and living on your tax dollars as well! Recruited by Jihadist Hilary and her gang!
          We are talking about a culture that is so filled with hatred! What kind of people will fight each other to drink the urine of their religious leaders, and to eat their manure and even spread it all over their bodies??? Iran is a country were you can murder you wife in public if she disgraces you or brings shame to you in any way! Yes it is okay as long as you drag her to the street and declare why you are going to beat her, and if she dies well this was by the hand of Allah! And their Religious leaders as well teach and preach openly that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the rightful ruler of the world!!!!! Hey Idiots do you get it!!! They say he is the rightful leader of the World! I guess Ron Paul is either an complete Idiot or an Islamist psychopath! Make you pick either way he is not what America needs!
          Anybody that ignorant and uninformed about who and what he is talking about does not need to be the leader of any nation…Has not Obama demonstrated that enough for us????

      • Charlotte Juett

        Who are you going to believe about foreign policy? The ones that believed that Iraq had WMD and they found that they didn’t or the person that more of our boots on the ground soldiers support more than any other because they can see futility of on going wars in person.
        The Middle East has been fighting each other for over a thousand years and we think that we are going to be able to come in and with force of arms force them to institute a Constitutional Republic?
        Ron Paul understands the history and economics of this situation and is determined to get us out of wrong headed ideas of forcing the world to follow us. We would influence many more by sticking to our Founder’s principles and our Constitution and lead by example.

        • USAMYCOUNTRY

          CHARLOTTE………you have got to be kidding……..the middle east gives two hoots in hell about our founders principals and our constitution…. they have their own ideas and that is to kill the infidels……..AND SISTER …YOU ARE AN INFIDEL ……KID YOUR SELF NOT…..

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.

        Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party and independent votes.

        Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party

        Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them

        Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.

        Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

        Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

    • Gale

      We need a whole new line up for president, Congress, the House, all the way down! And they need to be REAL AMERICANS WHO WILL FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION!

      The End

    • Sackett

      Whereas obama’s foreign policy is bowing to muslim dictators and sending troops into a country that was not threatening us via a phone call from his golf cart.

    • Jt

      Just look at all this rhetoric! You people are so quick to bash him yet you have no reasoning or evidence to offer. I have yet to see ANYONE take Paul on in the debates, they change the subject or else literally lie (Bachmann, Iran did NOT say “wipe Israel off the map” because such a phrase doesn’t even exist, you LYING NEOCON).

      Please, give a reason, otherwise you look like a foolish sheeple which I suspect is the case.

      • Roxanna

        Dr. Paul has brought out MANY issues to be discussed to the debates. He is NOT there to make bets, or make people laugh about serious issues concerning us all. He wants to debate the issues at hand. No one has mentioned that this is now a nation ruled by military law from the Defense bill just passed and signed into law. Don’t be to surprised it Dr. Paul gets that into a debate one way or another. OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN STRIPPED FROM US!!! HELLO?? We have no “due process” under the law if they knock or blow down our doors for a “suspicion” your guilty and WILL be detained without representation!!! NAZI GERMANY IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER…..research the history!

      • Sonja

        People like you need to get educated on the reason Iran, & the other Muslim countries want us destroyed. It will not stop with them with a President that does not believe their goal & reason to destroy us & Israel. Our enemies have made a vow that has been going on for thousands of years that they are to destroy all “infidels” as they call us. Our country having a good economy, following the Constitution “WILL NOT” stop our enemies from their goal of destroying us. It will only “open” the door for them to succeed without us protecting our country & Israel.

      • USAMYCOUNTRY

        JT……..excuse me sir…….DO NOT CALL ANY ONE A LYING NEOCON…….. I…personally heard AHDIMANUT JOB say in one of his speeches………IT IS HIS JOB TO DESTROY ISRAEL AS IT IS HIS DUTY TO BRING ALLAH BACK ……..((((((.THAT IS WHY HE IS BUILDING HIS ARSONAL ….TO TAKE OUT ISRAEL..))))))………..( we beleive that if that comes about)) it will be the return of our JESUS CHRIST……we are the infidels as is England and he intends to do us all in……HE DOES NOT WANT THE LAND OF ISRAEL …..HE WANTS THE JEWS DEAD ….. GONE……CAPOOT……….GOT IT..??????????

    • Stephen Fox

      Michael, you’re not informed my friend. You, and millions like you feel you have a firm handle on important knowledge pertaining to the military, finances, and all other “political” realms. What you have is the same 3rd hand knowledge passed on to people like Rick Santorum. The GOP is a good ole’ boys club, and they lobby hard to keep you listening to Rush Limbaugh, watching Fox News, and believing anyone that doesn’t agree with them is part of the “left wing media.” If you don’t believe me, take 15 minutes. Use two to take a deep breath and prepare yourself to be open-minded, and 13 to watch the video here: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/316304

      You’re being led by people that only want to control you. The GOP is not your friend.

    • Bob in Boston

      Actually Ron Paul matches up against Obama better than ANY of the other candidates, so if the GOP wants to oust Obama, then the party had better start supporting them. A vote for Romney or Gingrich is a vote for Obama at this point.

      • Ron

        you sound like those morons that ran our counrty with there paycheck and power like the Kennedys and that traitor John Kerry, (this does not include JFK)

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          OK… Well, how did warmonger McCain work out for you in the last election?

    • Gary

      You’re drinking the Left Wing Media Kool Aid, Including Fox News who has a completely different agenda than the American People! Be careful about being manipulated for or against any candidate by Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Eric Bolling among many others. Sean talks about being Conservative before being a Republican and that is a complete fallacy! When you compare the rantings of all of these people compared to the Constitution, they fall far short of being Conservative! Conservative means Conservative by Constitutional Standards, not their own made up view of how the country should be! All of the above tend to be more Establishment types when it comes to picking candidates. Establishment candidates would continue our march to the CFRs, One World Order, United Nations bunch who have put us into this horrendous mess! Establishment, One World Order types like Newt, Romney, Perry would continue the damage already done but more subtly and slowly than Obama but rest assured, you will not be any happier with any of these three a few years down the road! Do your homework and don’t believe everything you’re hearing on radio, tv, or newspapers. Ron Paul has received more donations from the Military than all of the other candidates COMBINED. Do you think they have some insight into the matter. I trust their judgment far more than any media blabber! Ron Paul has received over 4 million in donations in the last 3 days to advance his campaign. Why do you say he has no chance of being elected. When people like you say that it drives more people like me to push even harder for Ron Paul who is the strongest, most truthful, Constitutionally principled candidate in the field!!!
      That’s What WE NEED!! The Constitution must be our guide, not some highly paid media person with an agenda completely different than ours!

      • http://conservativebyte Robert

        Say it again, Gary. I think these idiots are deaf! RP is the only one, who isn’t for a one world government!

        • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

          Ron Paul is whacked. His supporters are being led to slaughter, and want to take the rest of us with them. Ron Paul is the one Obama really wants to take on. He is by far the weakest candidate of the field. Obama will win a 50 state victory if Ron Paul is the nominee. WHY are democrats supporting Ron Paul? Because he is the ONLY candidate they know, Obama can beat!

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.

            Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.

            Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party

            Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.

            Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.

            Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

            Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

          • 57 girl

            Obama wouldn’t stand a snowballs chance in an open debate with Ron Paul … on any subject.

        • Southerner

          Concerning Ron Paul, Well read below and understand he is so ill informed it is pathetic! The worse thing is even though his followers may have good intention they have adopted the same tactics as the liberals. They rewrite history with partial presentations and obliterate facts and ignore what other people have experienced! Do you people realize what 40 plus years of fanatical teaching has done to Iran? How many of these Ron Paul Supporters have ever been there??? Let me tell you about Iran, and the Iranian people!
          You do not even have to go to Iran to see what I am saying is true! Just go to Los Angeles, California where you will be able to chat with many of the State Department sponsored immigrants who are coming from Iran during the present Administration …yes recruited by our State Department to immigrate to the United States…..As they drool with hatred let them tell you with fanatical hatred how much they hate this nation! Get real people! They were brought here on your tax dollars and living on your tax dollars as well! Recruited by Jihadist Hilary and her gang!
          We are talking about a culture that is so filled with hatred! What kind of people will fight each other to drink the urine of their religious leaders, and to eat their manure and even spread it all over their bodies??? Iran is a country were you can murder you wife in public if she disgraces you or brings shame to you in any way! Yes it is okay as long as you drag her to the street and declare why you are going to beat her, and if she dies well this was by the hand of Allah! And their Religious leaders as well teach and preach openly that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is the rightful ruler of the world!!!!! Hey Idiots do you get it!!! They say he is the rightful leader of the World! I guess Ron Paul is either an complete Idiot or an Islamist psychopath! Make you pick either way he is not what America needs!
          Anybody that ignorant and uninformed about who and what he is talking about does not need to be the leader of any nation…Has not Obama demonstrated that enough for us????

          • 57 girl

            You are so full of chit.

          • CJ

            Are you a Jew?

      • freedomlover

        Right on Gary, I wish these people who are against RonPaul would listen to what he has to say about foriegn policy instead of listening to the media and read their constitution so they know what it says, then maybe they would see that Ron Paul is our only hope.

        • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

          I have listened, and don’t like what I hear, just as any free thinker would feel. Want isolationism? Vote ron paul. The year is 2011, not 1800. World isolationism, as Paul desires, is not even thinkable in the world of today! Ron Paul, just go back to the home, take your meds, and a nap. You are nutso! Your followers are worse!

          • candi

            you are so right…..

          • Southerner

            Thank you D Rash!!!!! These people completely ignore history! They think it is 1782!

    • john

      Paul is the liberal presses, and the democratic party’s favorite republican right now. No wayPaul can beat anyone. Gingrich has more ideas than all of the candidates put together. That is what this country needs right now, someone with ideas. Paul is a dud with a capital “D”. Conservatives, please wake up and don’t let the democrats and the liberal press influence you. Just take notice. Every one that has taken a lead in the primaries has been beat down by the liberal press until only the worst candidate will be left standing. If conservatives allow that to happen, then they deserve what they get. Look at the last presidential election. That’s exactly what happened, and we wound up with the worst possible candidate with “zero” chance of winning. You don’t have to like the candidate personally, but lets put someone in there that knows how to right this country. It ain’t Ron Paul.

      • McChief

        I’m a retired Air Force CMSgt. I support Ron Paul and have contributed to his campaign repeatedly. Check his record and you will see that he is the ONLY candidate that votes IAW the Constitution every time. If you don’t believe that, perhaps you should read the Constitution, Federalist papers and other founders opinions with a critical eye and the goal of understanding rather than refuting their positions and the facts. It will be very enlightening. I don’t watch the main stream media, including Fox. I don’t read the main stream print. I form my opinion based on my own research from a vast number of sources. I have been studying our constitution, Congress’ and our courts tyrannical actions for decades. Most have absolutely no regard and/or understanding of our Constitution, proven by their words and deeds. America, wake up. We are at the precipice. Will it be freedom? Or tyranny? The latter I fear!

      • freedomlover

        IT IS RON PAUL! I wish you people had some discernment.He is the only one that votes constitution every time. The rest of those clowns just say what they think the people want to hear at the time. What do you think is going to pull us out of this mess if its not the constitution and someone who will enforce it? We wound up with the worst possible candidate because the NWO put him in,not because he was elected.

      • http://CanObamabebeat? d rash

        EXACTLY! These Ron Paul fruitcakes, are letting the democrats “pick their candidate” just as they did in 2008, by forcing McCain onto us. They beat down everyone else, until McCain was the only one left. How did that work out for us? The democrats “KNOW FOR A FACT” that Ron Paul IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE OBAMA CAN BEAT, SO they “nudge” us towards picking him as our candidate! Question? Do you want another 4 years of Obama? OK, then if you do, support Ron Paul for President, and guaranteed, you will get Obama!

        • paulsupporter onceagain

          the independents and some of the Dems are supporting Ron Paul. They too have realized we canNOT afford this military all around the planet plus the over spending on things.

          All of the others are big spenders. They are all quite wealthy and think about themselves first. How many are actually in touch with Main St.???

          The young adults are the ones that will swing this election. If they want another worse 4 years or some real change is up to them.

        • Southerner

          d Rash so true this is history being repeated by a real bunch of Idiots, armchair analyst and Cyber Idiots! Ever noticed how they only know to post Youtube and newspapers….hmmmm Who else does that? Hmmmm think hard now! LIBERALS!

    • Millicent

      Absolutely correct. His supporters skew the polls. He is a disaster and most sane people know this.

      • Al

        Personally, I think Newt and Mitt supporters skew the polls with their ignorance… just saying…

    • Frank

      @ Michael:
      Come on Michael! Ron Paul is the GOP’s best candidate! He appeals to both Independents & Democrats for multiple reasons. He’s the only candidate that will cut $1 trillion from the budget & balance it in 3 years. He’ll audit, then try to phase out the corrupt Federal Reserve (will make lots of OWS people happy). He’s opposed to ObamaCare and will cut the size & scope of government (will make the Tea Party happy). He’s opposed to fighting undeclared, Unconstitutional wars & he’ll bring the troops home (will make the average servicemen/woman happy). He’ll stop telling Israel what to do (should make Israelis happy). Being non-interventionist, he’ll make most governments around the world happy.

    • James Urban

      I agree completely. IMHO, this guy is an absolute whack-job.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Based on what?

      • Mike in PA

        Can you support your opinion with some facts please.

    • charles

      The only one dangerous is YOU for not knowing our Constitution!! SHAME ON YOU!

    • Adam Gonzalez

      Michael, you are the part of the mind wash establishment that believes anything, the net work tells you, go vote for Obama, or the other Zionist warmonger GOP offer! Your a coward go fight no win wars, go to Iran and fight them you sheeple, if you come back with PSTD or without your limbs, Go and then go to Hell.

    • John

      Ron Paul reminds me of the old cartoons that depict an ostrich with its head buried in the sand. His statement on Jay Leno’s program shows his ignorance about the threat of Islam. Get hold of a Koran and read the damned thing! Muslims are the friends of no one but other Muslims.

      • Charlotte Juett

        Yet, before we started meddling in the politics of the middle east they were so busy fighting eachother that they didn’t have time for anyone else. If we get out of their way they will go back to fighting eachother and leave the rest of the world alone. Let them have their oil, we have more than enough energy within our own borders to power this country for the next 200 years.

    • alphamel

      Mitt Romney is by far the preferred candidate to defeat Obama even if not as right wing as some would prefer. Paul or the Gingrich That Stole Christmas would be self-destructive for the GOP.

      • alphamel

        “MITT” connotes a fist or boxing glove. “NEUT” conjures up a tiny insect, a cretin on “HERCULES”, or a neutral person.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Mitt is a flip flopper. He is on both sides of every coin on every issue, including abortion and tarp bailouts. Obama will mop the floor with him. You have to be kidding me!

      • paulsupporter onceagain

        let’s hear what you say when you see his health care prices. Mass has one of the highest health care premiums in the nation. Wait till someone brings it up.

    • Don

      Paul would just more or less hand the election to Obama. One more term with him, could well wreck the economy and our freedoms with it. With even greater debt, a weakened military, more bailouts, more stimulus, more spending, more regulation, and more hindering energy production would be a disaster from which we might not be able to correct. Almost the last straw with Paul, is that he is not even willing to say he would support the GOP nominee if he is not the nominee. We are desperate to replace Obama, not give him another term to continue his destruction of the nation.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Seriously? You have to be joking… Ron Paul is the only one fighting for our constitutional rights. He is the only one fighting for our economy. He is the only one serious about cutting spending. Ron Paul is the only candidate against the bailouts. Ron is the only one against the stimulus, regulation. You are saying the exact opposite of everything Ron Paul has fought for over the last 30 years.

        I am calling you a flat out liar. I would say you have no clue what you are talking about, but I can’t imagine that you are that out of touch, so I am calling you a flat out liar.

        You should vote for Bachmann. You have something in common. Lies.

        • candi

          excuse me, ron paul is a kook… period…i never realized there were so many stupid, dense people out there… he would be worse than mccain, and that horrible.

          • Al

            Newt is a Kook! It amazes me how many stupid people out there support that moron…

    • bj christensen

      Ron Paul is an absolute idiot! He worse than obuma.

      • Pepper

        He worse, be he? How so, factless bloviator?

      • Al

        lol… No Dr. Paul is probably the most educated person out of the whole bunch… Surely he’s smart enough to spell Obama’s name… *cough-clear throat*

        • Southerner

          Al ….Can’t you post something that is even worthy of someone making a comment about?????

      • Mike in PA

        Proof please.

    • RebelRich76

      To Michael and all his agreeable minions:
      You say Paul is a ‘dangerous candidate’, that his foreign policy is a ‘disgrace to conservative principals’ and he’s the ‘worst possible option’. The only thing that can be said to those comments is that either you’re an intellectual brainiac with superior genius to the Founding Fathers, who Ron Paul emulates in both action and policy, or the more likely scenario of your being a mental midget warhawk that would control or annihilate half the world ‘just because’.

      There’s little doubt that the Founders would find you and those that agree with you just as revolting as you find Ron Paul. They openly deplored your type of mentality by signing a Declaration against just such aggression and then fought a war to be rid of it. If the narcissistic, militaristic, intervention style of aggressive nation building and/or destruction by the old British Empire that this nation now employs is your idea of ‘conservative principals’, then I pity you, because some day it’s going to circle around and bite you right in the arse! And given what I know is coming, that few others do, you’ll be eating your own words soon enough. What this government is doing overseas right now, it will soon be doing right here in our borders with military troops to YOU!

      • CJ

        I’m with you RebelRich- The NDAA passed.

    • RJ

      Ron Paul is an unelectable Loon. I just pray that his worshipers come to their senses and don’t do anything stupid to give the election to Obama. Every time I hear ‘Third Party” I get a knot in my stomach.

      • Mike in PA

        He is a loon because…?

    • kowboy

      Kinda looks like others are saying people of Iowa have no brains. If all the
      nay sayers here against Ron Paul would do their homework, instead of listening to the whores of the media, they would discover Ron Paul is the only Candidate with principles and morals , …and he is not against having a defending army.,.but against the ‘illegal’ wars.
      Obama on the other hand is the elite’s puppet like most past presidents,..and he was just voted illegible for President in the courts because he is not an American citizen, and should not have been President in the first place. It’s time the American people took their blinders off and realize until Ron Paul,..the leaders of both leading parties are but two heads of the same beast. He is the only one that wants to sincerely work “for” the people. Wake the frig up !!

    • Vinnie

      I would prefer we follow the conservative principles of the founders. Oh wait…

      “She [America] has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart. She has seen that probably for centuries to come, all the contests of that Aceldama the European world, will be contests of inveterate power, and emerging right. Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.
      She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.
      She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.
      She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.” – John Quincy Adams July 4, 1821

    • Annie

      Agree.

    • Timothy Brummer

      Ron Paul is only dangerous to the Bilderberger banksters, obviously you have been brainwashed by them.

    • mickey2

      A refreshment read on the Constitution might be in order. NDAA has pretty much destroyed this.

      It isn’t by accident obama goes to the UN instead of defending the Constitution. Neither is it by accident that McCain is involved.

      I used to view the repubs as conservative in thought, think before taking action. Now I think the repubs are screaming “bomb the world”, we are taking over.

    • Sonja

      You are correct, sadly if he does get the nomination, the people that vote for him, will only be giving Obama a win which is what we do not want to happen.

    • Marie

      People Get Educated! Stop the same old bull!Ron Paul can not only do it, but do it better then anyone else. His record speaks for himself. He may not be young and have great hair but look what that has gotten this country . Because most people vote for all the wrong reasons instead of doing a little research.

      Merry Christmas and God Bless.

    • Art

      Michael, you are 100% correct. Ron Paul continues to mess things up for the country. Every election.

      • candi

        you are so right, why does he keep running time after time…. just to cause a mess… hes a kook…

        • 57 girl

          I have to laugh at you name callers with no reasoning behind your comments. “Hey Candi, Your Momma is fat and wears combat boots”. There, I said it. It must be true!, huh? LOL . Seriously, do a little (in your case, a lot of) research, why don’t you? I think you’ll be surprised when you discover the truth about Ron Paul.

          • Southerner

            Yes 57 girl….. It really reminds you of the comments Ron Paul made about the other Candidates on the Jay Leno show! we did discover the truth about him…that is why we do not want him!!!

          • Jason Burns

            Candi, your Mamma is fat and she wears combat boots! That was awesome 57 girl. Problem, it’s not true unless you type it in all caps.

    • mike turner

      Ron Paul is the only candiate that gives this country a chance to get out of the toilet, stop parroting Fox News

    • candi

      i agree with you, ron paul has no chance of winning anything… he just stands up there and acts like some sort of kook… whats wrong with these people.. and who died and made iowa so important… what about the rest of the country????? our elections just dont seem right. vote for paul and give the general election to obama… stupid people.

    • blindenoughtosee

      Dear Michael ? what did Iraq or Iran or any nation ever do to you ?Only governments start wars everyday people just work to feed their family like the rest of us do?where is the 2.3 trillion dollars Donald lost as secretary of defense? He said I do not know where the money is to congress. What about the Iran contra weapons we sent to Iran to kill the Iraq peoples ,then the weapons we gave to Iraq to kill Iranians . This government needs to keep its nose in its own country. leave those people alone .When you wake up homeless and your children because our government lost 2.3 trillion and much much more ? then it will be to late to say to your kids I am sorry when they are hungry God Forbid . change it now ,this will be your last chance and it will be very hard.

      • Southerner

        blindenoughtosee….oh boy now we have philosopher in the bunch! So disconnected from reality he sees things we don’t!!! You do not understand a thing about what you are talking about! You better stick most simpler read material…like ..see dick run, Jane has a ball , see Spot chase the ball!

        • blindenoughtosee

          Southerner you are a puppet that only speaks what someone else tells you and you believe it .You need to be schooled again by someone who knows real truth .How much of your truth is eye witness to the fact .As we thought none ? you are stupid is as stupid speaks AND YOU CANT FIX STUPID PUPPET BOY OR GIRL WHAT EVER YOU ARE. How do you feel now ?You are a follower not a leader ,speak what you know not some other persons words what they said to back up your point of view . Oh you have no point ,or view someone must report on it before you can speak. You change your mind like the weather not Like RON PAUL who has a perfect voting record .read you might see with eye witness if you can read ?you are a DEM-A-CRACK-trying to change true Republicans minds .they can read and look at the voting records,eyewitnesses.to truth.

    • billy

      All the Paulettes keep harping that if he is not the nominee then they won’t support the eventual GOP nominee. THAT IS STUPID!!! We all know Paul will do well in Iowa because his supporters are fired up, but that will be all the glory Paul gets. No candidate is perfect but they are all preferable to Obama. He is the target. We must support the eventual GOP nominee even if it is kooky Paul or a RINO…..ABO

    • michael peck

      you moron, paul would decimate obama in a debate, Paul is the only true conservative in the race, look up the word ‘consevative’ one who conserves, not one who attacks weak countries and depletes our national treasure..his foriegn policy is the only sensible one, we are broke, we must end these stupid wars, your line of thinking will surely bring an end to our country as we know it….

    • Stephanie

      Ron Paul wants to make America strong again! Tell me why you think we should be the police of the world! Bring them all home and make this country strong. Then, if they need our help, we can help when we want to.
      The Constitution had it right and if we get back to it this country would be a lot better!

    • Dntmkmecmoverther

      Don’t believe the polls. Poll trolls can get any response they deem necessary to spin the caucus outcomes. The Des Moines Register endorsed the Romulan just so that Newt would take a hit in the polls (sheeples still see the newspaper as having some integrity…most of us don’t hold that ideal any longer). The DSM Register is the most leftist rag known to man; and they’re determined to do whatever they can to see Obummer re-elected. This nomination of the romulan is just another of their ploys.

      As for Ron Paul, he has some supporters, all of which show up for the debates; but what you see there is what you get and it aint much. Gingrich will likely walk away with the nomination as long as people’s brains don’t fall out their backsides. If the romulan gets it, we are in for 4 more years of obummer. God help us.

    • Terry Elliott

      Dead on!! I can’t think of a thing to add to your post!

    • Michael

      Ressex – you state that Paul’s foreign policy is the only Constitutional representation of foreign policy. Artilce 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution defines the authority of government with regardds to defense. Please tell us all where you and Mr. Paul believe you see ignorance as a peacekeeping solutiomn. It didn’t work pre-911 against Al-Queda and will certainly not work against Iran.

      To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

      To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

      To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

      To provide and maintain a Navy;

      To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

      To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

      To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

      • RG

        Michael. It would have worked if Congress had listen to Dr. Paul then when he said use the Letters of Marque and Reprisal. The problem was and still is that the UN does not want us to delcare war and win it, 95% of the Congress doesn’t even know what the Letters of Marque and reprisal are, and the banksters control most of the media to prevent its release to the uninformed public like yourself. These Letters of Marque and Reprisal are the legal documents that allow the government to go directly after non-country forces or individuals and either capture or kill them in any location on the planet. You know like Obama did with Seal Team 6.
        Time to WTFU (wake the fooled up) Michael. You are the one fooled or are the useful idiot being tooled because you aren’t schooled. Perhaps you are just a progressive socialist (ne0con) that seeks to hold position in the police state take over. Whatever shoe fits…

        What didn’t work is sticking with the idiots that have run our country for the UN and its banksters by the candidates they’ve bought and sold over the last 100 years. Those who opposed them were shot and killed or shot and changed their course to comply with the New World Order.

        We finally have a real chance to eliminate the socialistic, unconstitutional steering of America and put it back into the hands of the people first, not he bankers first. A real chance to re-establish American exceptionalism, but appearantly you really hate those goals.

        • 57 girl

          With the internet at our disposal and the information it affords, it is difficult to believe that every person in this Nation is not standing with Ron Paul. He is the ONLY Candidate that will indeed fight on our side and for the love of his Country, rather than personal gain. No wonder America is going down the tubes so fast. Too many people simply refuse to open their eyes and face the truth.

          • Paul

            Dr. Ron Paul’s web site has more intelligent information than all of the other candidates put together. If you go to this web site you will come away convinced that he MUST be our next President.
            http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

    • Ben Midulla

      If you choose to ignore Ron Paul and like getting your news from only the outlets that you choose to listen to. Ron Paul wants you to get your facts straight not that packaged crap that they are portraying as fair and balanced or what I refer to as fairly balanced if it fits their agenda that day. The boys at fox want make sure that your hen house is protected properly. I know that you would rather have someone that has never served calling the shots on going to war. I have never had to fight for my country, so I feel unqualified for the job and am uncertain that I have a dog in the hunt. I would like to have someone who has had a dog in the hunt in the highest office or at least not been a “chicken hawk”. I am certain that deleting of this rather than reading it may be the reader’s best response, as it is not from the guys protecting the hen house or someone that is nothing more than a well paid entertainer. Fox news serves a very important function, They make certain that things do not get swept under the carpet and ignored, but viewing them as the solitary unbiased source of information is perhaps unrealistic and should be viewed with skepticism. I know that you are not interested in sweeping things under the rug either so I am forwarding this to you. Be careful though your chickens are endangered from the air and the ground, there are foxes and chicken hawks hanging out waiting around. Praise the lord that we have second amendment so we stand guard and protect our hen house, I know that you and Scott will supply all the proper ingredients.

      • RG

        Never let the hen house be run by the Fox, or mouseland by the fat cats.

    • Pastor Ruth

      Paul in NOT dangerous! He is the most independent thinker of the bunch with a proven track record. He is NOT however in the pockets of the BIG Bankers: the Rockefellers who own Citibank; the Rothschilds who own Bank of America; the Morgans who own Chase. Follow the money! The bankers own the corporations who buy the elections who enslave us and tell us what we can and can’t do. Paul is for cutting us loose! Getting rid of the FED that was created to bring us to default. They are a private organization – not run or overseen by anyone. They answer to no one, and Paul is right, they need to be shut down.

      America is the last standing tower of freedom that the One Worlders must topple! We can’t let that happen or the whole world will be enslaved. God is our only hope, but Ron Paul should be our only candidate. No one else is willing to talk about this, or to stand up to them. He is willing to stand alone for US. He sees the big picture.

      We MUST regain our sovereignty and our freedom, or we will be duped into handing control to someone who can be bought!

      As a Christian I am aware of some of the drawbacks of legalizing drugs, and allowing for same sex relationships. Believe me, I am personally not for that. But I also know that you cannot legislate morality or faith. It must be a personal decision. Once you see what the alternative: slavery, you say, OK, I will work harder to share my faith on a personal level, while allowing everyone the freedom to choose. Our jails are filled with the poor who are serving time for petty crimes while the BIG criminals get away with anything they want.

      In order to keep our freedoms and our sovereignt, I recognize that a more libertarian view is the surest way to keep America standing.

      • 57 girl

        Beautifully stated and the God honest truth. Thank You for a well written statement. I hope some of these poor misguided sheep will stop long enough to read it and absorb your insight.

    • Paul

      Every election year Ron Paul makes a trip in from Mars just to excite a few voters (Iowa hicks) has no chance of getting nominated on his return home he should take a few excited followers with him back to his home planet

    • Michael

      From a logical Michael to a delusional michael. If Ron Pauls foreign policy is a disgrace why don’t you offer any reason why it is. Could it be you don’t know and are repeating what your slave masters fox news and the neocons want you to say. If Iran hates the Jews so bad why do they have 25,000 jews in Iran. They have 24 mosques in Tehran and the Jewish people even have a seat in Irans Parliment. Youtube Jews in Iran and you will hear the Jewish leader in Iran tell you they are not Persecuted by the Iranian Government. This conflict between Iran and Isreal is a Gov. conflict not a Irainian people against Jewish peolple. Listen to what Netanyahu said to congress a few months ago. Isreal doesn’t need American nation building they can thake care of themselves. They don’t need or want American troops there. Get educated on what is going on in the world and stop being a puppet to the neocon cronycapitalists that control you.

      • Donald DeHoff

        Sir, I am a retired military officer and for the last 3-years, 7-days a week, I have been studying the religion and cultural problems of the world, I find little credibility in any of your comments.. You obviously have not read an approved English translation of the Qur’an, which clearly states that Jews and infidels have three options, convert and be a second (or third) class Muslim, pay an exhorbant annual tax or have one’s head removed. You are obviously of the Islamic faith so I will not bother you with chapter (Surah) and verse. I suspect you do not even know about the Qur’an’s lack of chronology and its undated “abrogations”, which make that Holy Book almost undeceipherable, even by the more learned Muslims. Their statement that Islam is a “religion of peace” insults the intelligence of the entire non-Muslim world.

    • KH

      You obviously are one of the “new” conservatives otherwise known as a neocon. You don’t mind bankrupting America in order to police the world. America is broke and the Federal Reserve has to print money in order to sustain the size of the military. We give military support and monitor the borders of foreign countries that have better economies than we do. This doesn’t even cover the fact America enters wars not on Constitutional principle like a declaration from Congress but from tyrannical presidents who send men and women into harms way under the orders from a foreign governing body, namely the United Nations. You also are ignorant of history. You need to read how the CIA forced the Shah on the sovereign people of Iran which caused them to hate us ever since. Every time the US sticks their nose into another nation’s business it always comes back to bite us on the butt. Please do all Constitutional, liberty minded, freedom loving people a favor. Read the Constitution, learn some economics and history.

    • Ron

      The dems have been placing people in the Repubs caucus, for the soul purpose of supporting the worst candidate, that has no chance to beat Obama in the election. Notice the huge change in the poll numbers in a very short time.
      We need to stop talking and argueing about we should do this or that and actually start taking action to take back our country before it is to far gone. Volunteer for something anything to help, other than a lot of lip service that is pretty much contianed within the ears of the choir here and take no action at all. Transform it into action and we will win!!!
      God Bless America
      May the lord keep us safe

    • ohevel

      Michael you are certainly right, more you can not be wrong considering the meaning of your own name

    • Ernest T.

      He sure can beat Obama! Alot of Liberals will vote for him. He has the anti-war vote tied up. He has the Liberation and Constuitalist in the bag. Paul is my first choise.

    • Darren

      Did you know that Ron Paul receives more donations from active duty military that all other candidates combined (including Obama). Do you think our troops would so overwhelmingly support someone whom they believed had bad foreign policy? If anyone knows what a good foreign policy should be, it’s our troops.

      http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/07/20/ron-paul-campaign-raises-most-donations-from-military/

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      MICHAEL, I AGREE, PAUL IS A DANGEROUS MAN, HIS FOREIGN POLICIES ARE VERY SCARY … HE SHOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT…I DO NOT THINK HE HAS ALL HIS MARBLES…. WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH IOWA ??? DON’T THE PEOPLE OF IOWA WANT TO GET OBAMA OUT OF OFFICE ??? PAUL WILL NEVER BEAT OBAMA…IF PAUL IS NOMINATED HE WILL FOR SURE PUT OBAMA IN OFFICE FOR 4 MORE YEARS !! WAKE UP IOWA & AMERICA OR WE WILL NEVER SEE AMERICA AS IT WAS IF WE ARE NOT CAREFUL WHO WE VOTE FOR !! GOD HELP US !!

    • Dorris

      Michael, Another one that agrees with you. You can sure tell by some of the comments,people really aren’t doing research on these people.
      That is how the Idiot we have in there now got in,well that and bought votes.
      Look that one up.

    • Michael

      Jason Burns – Roan Paul can profess to be whatver he wants. I don’t want a professor of faith – I want a Possessor of Christ. A Possessor of Christ would realize that turnimg our back on Israel is the behavior that screams anti-christ rather than Christ.

      • CJ

        Why does Israel come first? Are you a member of AIPAC?

      • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

        I am a born-again (saved) Christian and I disagree. Israel wants to be a sovereign nation. They don’t want our help. They don’t need it. They don’t want us telling them what they can and cannot do. Besides, Ron Paul is the only one who supports Israel. Click on my name above and visit my website where I post Ron Paul’s views on Israel, from one Christian to another.

    • cj

      We have the weakest, most dangerous president in our history right now. However, if Ron Paul were to become the next president we would be challenged with bombs, attacks, cyber terrorism, etc. on a daily basis because he is as weak or weaker than obama. If either of these two men were to become our president we can kiss our security and freedom GOODBYE!

    • GREENTEETH

      Iowa is controlled by the GOP, Iowa is a back up system for the GOP, They don’t want Newt, so they prop up Paul knowing that will shove more votes to romney. paul they might as well dig out the doomsdsy bomb and push the button on July 4th. Newt is our only hope, especially for wanting to take controle of the judges.

      • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

        Fail. We, the people who want change picked Ron Paul. As an Iowan, I would like to know where you are getting you misinformation?

      • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

        Newt is a flip flopping progressive with no core set of values. Newt is the white equivalent of Obama. If you vote for Newt over Obama, it’s probably because of skin color. The other option is that you are part of the establishment and you need another puppet to pretend he is running the country while the banksters run it behind the scenes. Good job red shield, you have them all fighting amongst themselves while you continue to pull the strings. Ron Paul is no establishment puppet. He will cut the strings. The banksters know this and they are terrified.

    • RG

      Regurgitory BS (buffaloed senility) you are espousing Michael. Every poll but one that has placed Dr. Paul against Obama, Dr. Paul has won. Take back your brin and let the rest of us take back the country, the Constituion, and common sense.
      President Paul = peace through friendship not isolationism/favoritism; prosperity through less unnecessary government regulation; principled leadership in Contitutional adherence, by a man of proven morality in his personal and professional life that has the congressional experience that the others lack or have greatly abused.

    • littlesnake

      So Michael it seems you really love Obumer. My ten year old dog is better than Obuma. Anyone or anything is better than Ob. Ron Paul has the only agenda to get America back on track and NON COMMUNIST!!! Unlike Nute or Romney they are just a reflection of Obumer. Or perhaps you want all of mexico going to school on your and my dime like in Texas.

    • Sam

      Your response is nonsense! You are just regurgitating what the “establishment media” is telling you to think! You need to gain your senses! You think it is a conservative principle to want to send our military all over the world bombing and policing all these other countries? The principle is to have a strong national “defense”, not a strong national “offense”!

      • Donald DeHoff

        Sir, you are not a military person or if you are, you do not understand tactics. Having the military at various locations around the world, gives us TIME. To attack our forces in Germany or Japan, gives us about 20 minutes to launch our military forces in the U.S. and other parts of the world. To attack the U.S. first, gives our Germany and Japan forces time to launch. With WMD on both sides, it is prudent not to launch a strike except as a “court of last resort”–which even the Russians acknowledged. If all of our forces where within the U.S. we could be “setting ducks”. War is not nice and it is expensive. Also, being close to a potential enemy provides strike capablity within seconds, not 20 minutes. I am sure the military would welcome your ideas on how to do the job better.

    • Donna Gamble

      Agree very much’ I was raised in Sioux City,and doubt they’re that dumb to vote for Paul. He’ll never beat Obama’ He rambles on when asked a direct question,he’d give the election to Obama. Probably only 2 canidates could hold their own or hopefully beat Obama in a debate. Then there’s all the $$ Obama will spend to smear,steal votes etc. It’s a Hard journey for us TRUE AMERICANS’

    • David

      I think he is the only candidate that could crush Obama in a debate. If you do not agree with his foreign policy then I guess you don’t think that we should follow the Constitution.

      • Donald DeHoff

        Sir, by your indefinate pronoun, “He”, I assume you mean Paul. Well, hands down, Newt is the most knowledgable and experienced man in Washington–”he has been there, done that” He knows both the national and international problems inside and out and is probably the only one who can stand up against Obama (and his teleprompter). True, he has some baggage, but I suspect all of them do. Keep in mind Obama receives daily briefs on all significant developments in the world, much of which is not available to “new kids on the block”, I think the biggest mistake we are making is waiting and hoping that the election will accomplish that which should be done by impeachment. Obma can and is doing irrepairable harm to this country and who knows what else he has in mind between now and election time. Ask you congresspersons why are they waiting. Also keep in mind, many of these outlandish problems he puts forth are merely “red herrings being dragged across the trail”, to keep our focus off of what he is really up to.

        • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

          Newt is a progressive. Newt = Obama

    • FOR HIM”"!RICH

      I’M CONSERVATIVE”! AND DR.RON PAUL’S POSITION ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS SUITS ME FINE’! NO MORE “NEO-CONS” IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY……THEY JUST WANT WAR AND MORE WAR’! THEY KILLED 5,500 INNOCENT AMERICANS IN A STUPID AND NON LEGALLY VOTED ON WAR (IRAQ) Plus……IT COST ME AND OTHER AMERICANS Close To A Trillion Dollars’! MORE LIES ABOUT “IRAN” WON’T SWAY MY POSITION AWAY FROM DR.RON PAUL. BUSH LIED THRU HIS TEETH ABOUT IRAQ”! NO MORE WARS…..NO WAR FOR ISRAEL AGAINST IRAN’!

    • LocalYokel35

      Consider that Ron Paul’s candidacy is the greatest danger that either party has faced in 75 years due to their compromise malignant drift from their constitutionally imposed limitations. Their traitorous condoning of drift from any articles set to contain all three branches within these limitations by disregarding oath of office has become tabu for media address.
      Condemnation by “conservative principals” of constitutionally limited foreign policy raised by Ron Paul only reveals an altered conservatism copy of that repeated by media attempting to impose its image on true patriots while hiding behind their media hyped party image long tarnished by words and actions contrary to their sworn oaths of office. The RNC with few exceptions has merely provided candidates of only slightly less corrupt image than those either unmentioned or MSM whitewashed for the competition.
      The DNC has provided none.

      Fact 1: Neurotics are broadly well accepted among their own kind.
      Fact 2: Neurosis has been reclassified as psychosis of a lesser degree.
      Fact 3: Inhaled hydrogen sulphide in sewer gas also conceals its pungent presence to all victims that fail to properly react to its first detection. Where will you find shelter and fit in?
      The time is at hand for both party and personal association reassessment to determine whether either conforms to patriotic thought process or simply volunteers as willing victims of media abetted principle compromise designed and practiced by their entire composite enemy political camp.
      Repetition of the media created electability threat only expresses the rampant fear consuming elected members of the other party that are expecting rebellion to run downhill in pursuit of all those caught in the inevitable patriotic tsunami building to swamp the cesspool wherein they all reside. Where will you find shelter and fit in?

    • Patrick

      Yup. to base a foreign policy on the Constitution is just nuts. What were our founding fathers thinking?

      Please tell me how you define conservative principles.

    • Robert Stone

      His foreign policy is the ONLY sane one. The rest are spouting off this hardline garbage to get votes while Paul is willing to speak what he honestly believes. Paul will get Independents and a lot of the fed up Democrats with republicans so the best choice to win. War is not going to make america strong, it only weakens on every front

    • Big Guy In CO

      Paul is NOT my choice for President as he has no chance in H**L of defeating Obamanation. He does not have the presents or stature of representing us in the world! He appears to resemble a ventriloquist dummy with someone else pulling the strings.

    • JERRYMATT

      APARENTLY MICHEAL, ALOT OF PEOPLE DON’T AGREE WITH YOU, AND NEITHER DO I. PAUL-PALIN 2012 YOU’LL SEE

    • amagi

      Dear Michael,

      If you had read any of Dr. Ron Paul’s very readable books, you would have known the
      difference between ‘principals’ and principles’. Amazingly many Americans do not.

    • Syl

      Beware not to fall for the hysterical media translations of what Paul said about Iran since they want to destroy him for a mainstream candidate. I saw the debate. He said that INTELIGENCE from Israel says there is no threat from Iran and Israel, of all nations, should be concerved if there was a threat. He did not say he would not act if there was a REAL THREAT of Iran getting nukes but did not want to over-react at this time. I am sure Bachmannn would not go to war if she had the same intelligence. So the real issue is: who’s intelligence is correct? However, I am a Bachmann supporter for other reasons — not this issue.

    • Paul

      Dr. Paul’s foreign policy is the same as George Washington’s. “Beware of foreign entanglements.” The Roman Empire’s decline was largely due to trying to police the whole World. We don’t need to have troops in 132 foreign countries. We need to start paying off our national debt. Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann seem to be the only candidates with a long term view. The rest are just focused on getting elected. As for Obama, he has already defeated himself and will probably not be the nominee for the Democratic ticket. Look for Hillery Clinton to be nominated.

    • Donald DeHoff

      Michael, there is a very touchy issue that has not been adddressed; one so serious that not even the Christian angels tread there; that is, it is pemature for any women to be our President. About half of the world leaders and cultures involve men who believe that women are inferior and should remain at the “beck and call” of their husband for sex and stay home and raise children. The world situation is far too fragile right now to have a women representing our interests on “life and death issues”. All of our women are great people, and their time will come, but if we elect a women she is going to be thrown into a male political lions den where “they” would tear her apart”—she would not have the respect needed to get an honest dialog going with those leaders, who wish us ill-will. With Huckabee and Cain out of the picture, I seriousy believe that Newt, the smartest and most experienced man in Washington, is the only one that can beat Obama and deal with the world situtation. Yes, there have been women in the past who have done great things, but they were both older and more experience in the political arena. Now is not the time to experiment and hope, as the stakes are much too high. We should not expect two “Tebows” in a single season.

    • Maynard Merrell

      To the citizens of Ioway: I had a very good friend from Ioway and that’s the way he pronounced it. Befor you vote, I’d like to see each and everyone of you read the following search on your computers. I think you will be glad that you did, and that you will feel that you are really leading the way for Americans. God bless you all!

      http://www.4rie.com/rie%201.html thru: 207.html And:

      http://www.4rie.com/mainindex.html

      • Paul

        You highlight a threat we ignore at our own and our countries peril. The “elite” would enslave us all.

    • Jeanie

      AMEN TO THAT MICHAEL.

    • Rich Bach

      I have made up my mind. I have 2 choices and neither of them are part of the Washington establishment. Those choice happen to be Herman Cain and Donald Trump. It’s really too bad that there was nothing backing up the comments that those women made about Herman Cain. If in fact he did sexually harrass any of them, it should have came out 15 years ago and not during his run for President. The media will do anything to undermine someone that can actually be the Usurper in Chief. Now it seems that the Republicans are going after each other when the focaus should be on the numbnuts in the White House.

      Did you know that his little “vacation” to Hawaii is going to cost the taxpayers somewhere around $14 million dollars and he won’t be traveling with his so called wife. She is already in Hawaii just like the vacation they took to Martha’s vineyard. This guy says he needs to raise taxes in a recession and he his spending taxpayer money like a drunken sailor. Wake up people. This country needs to be run like a business.

      I truly believe that if the House of Representatives had any cajones at all, they would start articles of impeachment so this guy won’t be getting paid his $400,000 salary for the rest of his life. What a retirement for just 4 years of thumbing his nose at the American people. I guess Boehner is nothing but a paper tiger.

    • dave

      Ron Paul is the only canidate that will /or can restore the freedoms and liberties of the people!!! Ron paul will win it all!!! Get the facts at infowars.com

    • Jeanie

      Paul must go PERIOD!!!!
      If you want the daylights scared out of you please read the following:
      These are cronies of Mr. Obama and some of his activists friends from
      Chicago. This was from the TEA PARTY NATION but, before you say no all has
      been checked and rechecked and verified to all be true. It is time we woke up.
      PLEASE READ AND REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING NAMES (Look them up)
      Kalle Lasn
      Wade Rathke
      Stephen Lerner
      Lisa Fithian (Obama’s activist friend from Chicago)
      http://grumpyelder.com/?p=10350 Also TEA PARTY NATION: “The Puppetmasters”
      You won’t be sorry but, you will be totally scared of what Obama is trying to do.

      • RioSam

        Do you know the number of payroll jobs in 1999 was approximately 130 million? That is the same number as in 2011. Zero growth. This economic stagnation is leading to economic decapitation and it is coming sooner not later. It is happening NOW. If this nation does not elect leaders with the political will to do battle with the entitlement status quo, to do battle with the monster that is the Federal Reserve, we are finished. Done. President Obama does not have the political will to do so. Far from it. Nor does he have the understanding of just how dire the situation is. Far from it. More of the same will only lead to the mutual destruction of both political parties and the nation

        Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/wall-street-insider-president-obamas-plan-to-unionize-the-american-military/#ixzz1h2MsWRfs

    • U.S.Patriot 01

      I agree and I say a vote for ron p is a vote for O !

      • RioSam

        Do you know the number of payroll jobs in 1999 was approximately 130 million? That is the same number as in 2011. Zero growth. This economic stagnation is leading to economic decapitation and it is coming sooner not later. It is happening NOW. If this nation does not elect leaders with the political will to do battle with the entitlement status quo, to do battle with the monster that is the Federal Reserve, we are finished. Done. President Obama does not have the political will to do so. Far from it. Nor does he have the understanding of just how dire the situation is. Far from it. More of the same will only lead to the mutual destruction of both political parties and the nation.

        Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/wall-street-insider-president-obamas-plan-to-unionize-the-american-military/#ixzz1h2MsWRfs

    • Punkin

      My cousins live in Iowa and have told our family here in Oklahoma that the make-up of Ron Paul followers in her state consist mainly of young ‘professionals’ and young people now of voting age. They are a group who refuse to serve this nation in any capacity, do not believe in military service at all, and believe that stupidly giving Ron Paul their votes, he will keep them out of the military. These aren’t pacifists, but rather more like the “you can’t do that to me” cowards who scurried northward into Canada during the Vietnam conflict, leaving other young men and women to fight and die for them, and in their places, then demanded amnesty decades later.
      The decent, hard-working, tax-paying, common-sensed citizens of Iowa are 110% against Ron Paul and for Newt Gingrich, are disgusted with what passes as politicians within and representing their state for the most part, and scared to death of Ron Paul.

      • Steve

        The upcoming vote in Iowa will demonstrate that your cousins are quite out of touch with the majority of Iowa voters and do not speak for them. You and they misrepresent the motives and intent of that very important demographic of young voters who see (apparently more clearly than you) where this country is headed and who is best positioned to turn things around.

    • WillburJ

      I think Ron Paul has the best chance of defeating Obama. More so than others because he believes in the Constitution, freedom, and peace. Just because he doesn’t want to go around killing people who “MIGHT” be dangerous is no reason to say his policy is bad. We need to be critical thinkers. Don’t drink the koolaide or follow the sheeple. Vote for someone you can believe in for a change instead of the lesser of two evils.

    • Richard William Faith

      Michael,
      Your disproportionate concern over (your own misinterpretation of) Ron Paul’s foreign policy reveals your ignorance of the Constitution. Q1) According to the Constitution, who has the sole authority to declare war? A1) Congress. Q2) According to the Constitution, who has the power to direct the appropriation and disbursement of funds? A2) Congress! If a President “happens to be” a (GOOD) diplomat, then so much the better; however, action on the part of a President that is tantamount to the declaration and/or funding of war is blatantly unconstitutional. If you apply this (the latter) principle to a list of Presidents that we have had over the last fifty years, you will begin to see how far off course we have veered. Perhaps you fear Iranian nukes? Remember, that is far more the province of Congress than of the President. Also remember that we will be sending many new members to Congress. If in fact Iranian nukes should turn out to be a threat within the next four years, here’s something else to think about: for years we have had, but have not fully developed, the technology to intercept enemy missiles and blow them up long before they can reach our shores. We SHOULD be MANUFACTURING them, IN QUANTITY. Of course, THAT cannot happen in our current “economic” (EXCUSE the misleading word!!!!!) situation. We need to GET AN ECONOMY FIRST; until we do THAT, we are HELPLESS. Any candidate who does not GET what I’m saying here, or more likely PRETENDS not to GET it, is probably a shadow operative of the New World DIS”order”. If that doesn’t seem important to you, then you must be one of the great number of people who WONDER why no one in Congress has the “cajones” to impeach obama! Well, I DO know why, and here’s a CLUE: it has NOTHING to do with “cajones”! It has EVERYTHING to do with New-World-DIS”order” connections! ALL politicians who are so connected (Bachman and Paul are the only prominent ones who ARE NOT) serve the same “masters” as obama, and if elected, will do the same things!

    • RioSam
    • Steve

      watch the John burch society vids. Here we come cap and trade

    • K P Smith

      Total Agreement–Paul is no better than McCain ever was

    • Chuck Miller

      I agree completely!!! Ron Paul is the worst GOP candidate. Paul blames America for 911. Check National radio talk show host Mark Levin for information on Paul. He is terrible on National Security, he stated on National T.V. in 2008 when he last ran for President he would eliminate all of our security services, including our FBI. When asked if a Country was preparing to attack America where would he go to get information Paul stated he would ask Congress. Yikes what a joke!!! Ron Paul will not support the defense of Israel. We can not elect another President like Obama that will continue to throw our ally Israel under the bus!!! Paul is not a Republican he is a Libertarian that supports George Soro’s open Society, which includes legal use of all illegal drugs such as Heroin, Cocaine, Meth, etc. Check out the facts and our American Citizens will not support this individual for President!!!

    • Truthseeker

      Ron Paul easily beats Obama in any debate!! Stop the negative jargon. Any vote other than Ron Paul is just another vote for the same establishment NWO rule that we have been suffering under for so long.

    • Davey

      Another Parrot,
      I will be over your house tomorrow and take over your life. I will tell you when you can go and when you can come back. Just shut up as I take control of everything because I am your Master.
      Another punk who has never been to war or even has the balls to join the military. All you fools do is repeat what you here with no facts except for someones opinion that has also never been there.

      Would you like for me to come to your house and escort you to the border, you might like the way the Mexicans treat you in their prisons? Leave stupid!

    • Daniel from TN

      I agree that Ron Paul is not the right candidate, but for more practical reasons. Granted, Paul has made some EXCELLENT points to-date during his campaign. However, he has also put his foot DEEP in his mouth and shown his total ignorance on several topics. These occurences convince me Paul’s age is already affecting him mentally, even if only occasionally at this time. If elected, Paul will be 77 when sworn into office. We need a president who will have clear mental faculties throughout his/her term in office: We simply cannot be 100% sure this will be the case with Ron Paul.

    • M.J.

      Then we are doomed to the same back stabbing lying politically correct traitors. Say goodbye to the America you once knew. My family came to this country in 1642. My mothers side signed the Declaration of Independence. This country now makes me sick to my stomach. This is biblical.

    • Sonny

      *Laugh. Foreign policy is a disgrace? I really, really didn’t know there were so many uneducated so called conservatives out there. Please do your homework, unless you are just a flat out war mongering neo-con. A better analysis is that the GOP has abandoned its conservative roots, and many of the voters it seems. Ron Paul is more in the lead than out of step. Unwavering constitutional values is what he carries, values and truths which have obviously been forgotten or just plainly been brainwashed out of several generations. The press keeps pushing that Libertarian thing, when in fact he is a True Conservative, never changing. It’s far more than just amusing to listen to those who say, “I like what he says, but his foreign policy is insane or crazy”. If only a more in depth History on the founding of this country would be taught in our Public schools then it wouldn’t sound so crazy. Here is a bit of history from the beginning, for those of you who think Ron Paul out of step and for those of you who have been brain washed on foreign policy.
      “George Washington’s advice in relation to internationalism”
      Washington advised the United States, in his Farewell Address, to remain a neutral player in the international political game. He urged the new republic to avoid conflicts and alliances with other nations. Although he felt that economic ties with other nations should be promoted to encourage trade and commerce, political ties should be minimal. He was concerned that having close relations could force the US to unite with allies to promote their interest and be drawn into their war. Likewise, he was concerned that strongly discordant relations would do the same and that both situations could force the US into conflicts that may not be important to the US. He was concerned that these types of relations would cause passion driven foreign policy rather than policy based upon the nation’s interest. Quoting him, “Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world….” – (George Washington Farewell Address) However, George Washington was not the only Founding Father of the United States to advise neutrality in foreign affairs. Thomas Jefferson, quoting him, stated “I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government [to be] peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none…” “Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto.” – (Thomas Jefferson 1801 former quote 1799 latter).

    • mark j

      you must be blind or deaf or maybe both, if you truly want to save this country do your home work on Ron Paul I think you will change you mind set and see the truth. Why do you think the media calls him a nut job is that the best they can come up with. 75% of active military want him, does that tell you anything? please do your home work Ron Paul 2012.

    • Allen Doss

      Hey: DUMB A’.
      “Paul can’t possibly win.” You freakin’ parrot. That’s what mainstream media has been saying since day one about Iowa but look at him now. You better jump on board because Ron Paul supporters have integrity and principle. They vote FOR something – not against Obama and jump from candidate to candidate in hopes of a “great white hope.” Paulians will stay home or vote 3rd party instead of voting for “the lesser of two evils.” Evil is evil. Better wake up man. Any other GOP nominee and Obama is back in. You’ll have no one to blame but yourself. Remember it.

    • Tejano Jack

      Iowa: Michael is right. Did you know that Paul just stated that PFC Manning, the kid who sent all of the classified matter to Wikileaks, is a hero? YES, A HERO! The kid grossly violated, with malice of forethought, the National Security Act and his signed, solemn oath to protect and keep safe all classified information to which he is exposed.

      For Paul to call this misguided kid a hero is madness. Surely, you folks in Iowa, a state that used to be the most literate state in the nation, can see that Mr. Paul is totally out of touch with reality. He means well, but he’s senile and irrational. How could any rational American, let alone a veteran, condone releasing mountains of classified documents to Wikileaks? It doesn’t matter what the information is.

      A lone private cannot be alowed that latitude in our military. Would you want the lives of your Iowa sons and daughters in the hands of a PFC Manning? Of course not.

      Clearly, others are answerable for allowing Manning to be in a position to do what he did, but he signed an oath to safeguard classified information under the provisions of the NSA. He’s lucky the government isn’t asking for the death penalty. In my opinion the government is being quite compassionate for not doing so. I believe they are now recognizing the boy is not stable and neither is Ron Paul.

      V/r, Tejano Jack

  • bsfurg

    I dont like the idea of Paul bring all of our troops home from othere countrys… I want to be kept safe knowing we have our front covered and I would like the back of me kept safe to… we need to keep all of our troops in the countrys they are in now.. We cant trust other country to say out of American.. we have the muslims tt\rying to take over America from the inside as Obama and Hillary seem to be communist…

    • BIRTHER

      WE HAVE 36,000 TROOPS GUARDING THE S. KOREAN BORDER.
      AND ZERO ON THE AMERICA / MEXICAN BORDER.
      HOW THE HELL DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL SAFE?
      WHEN I WAS IN S.O. WE COULD BE PARACHUTING IN ANY COUNTRY IN 24 HOURS..

      AMERICAN VETERAN

      • Ed

        At least they don’t have nuclear weapons!!!!!!!!!!!

        • john

          Yet

        • Sonja

          They do not need nuclear weapons, what better way to destroy our Country then from “within”. This is already happening with the muslim in the Whitehouse.

        • Davey

          BS! There are terrorists groups across the border waiting for their chance to attack us. We wiil be attacked by the ones here already thanks to those who refuse to close the border. They do have materials to make dirty bombs and others.

          Where do you come up with this BS?

      • Michael

        Birther, (the other Michael)
        Veterans know. Dem statments only mean dems are afraid of Dr. Ron Paul. He’ll be our new president.

        • Millicent

          Dems would be laughing rolling on the floor if this nutjob was are nominee.

          • charles

            Miliocant

            Dems are scared stiff of Ron Paul. WAKE UP!!

          • Robert Stone

            if you read his books you will find that he is not the nut that the media like to portray. He is the only one willing to say what he believes and do what he says, and consistent in voting. you know what you will get….. freedom from tyranny growing, and making friends instead of enemies abroad. To hell with the war policy,

          • Richard William Faith

            Then let them laugh all they want to. Hopefully they’ll rupture themselves in the process; then we’ll be RID OF THEM.

        • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

          GOD FORBID THAT HE WILL BE OUR PRESIDENT…PAUL SHOULD GIVE UP & RETIRE…HE COULD NOT WIN BEFORE WHEN HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT…SOME OF YOU PEOPLE ARE THINKING THE SAME WAY WHEN OBAMA RAN IN 08…DO YOU WANT OBAMA IN OFFICE AGAIN ??? USE YOU HEADS BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF YOU VOTE FOR PAUL…GOD HELP YOU ALL !!

      • Edward Levy

        I agree with you, BUT a bigger question, why do we still have our military in Germany & Japan 67 years later? No wonder that they have a great economy, they have almost no military budget

        • john

          Do a little research instead of listening to Barney Franks, etc, and you might understand why.

      • Grumpy old man

        To American Veteran; Your comment is the only intelligent thought out comment in this thread….

        • john

          More intelligent than what is coming out of yours anyway.

      • Mike

        Couldn’t have said it better birther. As a former Marine Scout Swimmer, we were working in countries south of Mexico without anyone else knowing, taking out shipping ports, airfields and harassing two different countries armies which ultimately led to a change in those country’s leaders. We were also charged as first responders, and the number of code reds we got were off the wall. Within a half hour, we would have our weapons drawn from the armory and our A.L.I.C.E. packs packed, ready to respond to a national emergency. I also believe we need to have a force working on all the north and south borders as well. Maybe rotate different infantry units. Bet there won’t be anymore illegal aliens making it over.

      • Sackett

        You Go American Vet.
        I would feel safer with OUR borders secured not some country half way around the world.

        Edward – I have asked that question many times about troops still in Japan and Germany.

        • john

          Either you didn’t get a reply, or you were too ignorant to understand it.

      • Louis

        Love you response American vet!!!!! I hope the rest of the small minds can see your point!

        • Louis

          I’m not saying you have a small mind, but the others do. LOL

        • Michael

          Louis – prove your conservative colors by leaving the personal insults to the dems. As others have stated, we find the tactics of the Paul supporters to be similar to those of the left.

          • Richard William Faith

            I hope you never have to learn this the hard way: NO proponent of one-world government can truthfully call himself a “conservative”. Here are some of the TENTACLES of the New-World DIS”order”:
            Bilderberg Group
            CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
            UN
            Trilateral Commission
            North American Union
            ;
            NEVER mistake any member or operative of ANY of the above for a CONSERVATIVE.

      • Stephanie

        I agree!!!!

      • FOR HIM”"!RICH

        THANK YOU BROTHER VET (AIR FORCE VIET NAM ERA VET) YOUR 1000% CORRECT….

    • Gale

      I’ve always wondered why the US is the ONLY country in the world to have bases all over the world?
      I think we need to bring all our troops home and secure our own borders and protect our own country and mind our own business.
      We meddle in other country’s affairs as if we own and control the world.
      I think we need to be like Switzerland! They set a good example.
      Ron Paul might just be what we need. The Democrats and Republicans haven’t done anything but get us in trouble around the world and deeper in debt and kicked God out!

      • JoJo

        Switzerland can afford to “set a good example” since they exist to take care of the world’s money and work under the radar. The progressives/socialists/communists are the ones that kicked God out of our country. McCarthy was correct back in the 1950′s, unfortunately, he went about it the wrong way.

      • john

        We aren’t the only country.

      • Ron

        We are not an island in the sky. Our troops over sea are protecting our country and the places they’re stationed. Use your brain and think here you are in the middle with fifty people around you you and they have fifty guns and you have one gun so what chance do you have to survive. Thats why troops are stationed around the world. Yes I am a 17 year veteran and I seen a lot. Russia want Germany, Poland and all those countries Hitler had and just think about that

        • mickey2

          Then we should let them protect their borders. We only need to get involved by treaty.

        • AZJEFF1963

          and its COSTING ME the AMERICAN TAX PAYER $…let them police themselves….i dont want my son giving his life for these OTHER countries….ef em

          • Michael

            And how much did the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq cost due to years of flawed and complacent foreign policy? How many innocent lives were lost on 9/11 because we rrefused to recognize that Radical Islam had declared war on us. Like it or not – we are at war with an ideology rather than a country or three or eight.

    • Ken Howe

      Ron Paul, by pringing the troops home would do a much better job of closing the borders. There is no way to eliminate the threat of some kinds of attack but we have no business providing Americas military to defend countries that hate us for doing it and don’t bother to pay us for doing it either.

    • Jt

      It is not safe at ALL to occupy other countries and police them and periodically drop bombs killing civilians en masse. Have you considered what we would do if someone else brought tanks to our streets and warships to our shores? We would attack them!

      When our national security is threatened in a REAL way, not a hyperbolic no-evidence way like we’ve seen with Iraq and now Iran, we should go to war. In fact Paul is the only one who would act swiftly and run a proper war in the case of a real threat.

      • Charlotte Juett

        The main principal in war should be to declare it first and then go win it in the most expeditious fashion and then come home. Instead we are spending in lives to destroy infrastructure, then paying corrupt entities to rebuild it and then have to destroy it all over again. How in Hel* does that make any sense.

      • Michael

        And just how do you account for the multiple bombings by radical Islam in the 90′s? Like it or not, radical Islam has declared war on this country. It is this very denial that led to 9/11 and the expensive campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran harbors terrorists. Iran has a stated policy of annhialating Israel and the United States. If your neighbor had a policy in place of anhialating you, your family and your interests – and was actively pursuing an arsenal of weapons dedigned to do just that – would you wait until the mission was accomplished?

      • Donna Gamble

        JT’ What planet are you from”Paul has stated NO WARS’ He’d give our country to anyone that threatened us.As far as The war in Iraq ,there’s a whole list of the items found that when assembled,were weapons of mass destruction.The mistake in Iraq,was’nt in getting into a war there,it was pulling all our troops out and admiting we are a weak,scared country that has no staying power. Now it’s wide open for other countries to take over and put all the lives we lost be in vain.

    • Annie

      Paul is too extreme on his views. Reduction, yes and more, much more emphasis on protecting our own borders… our borders are like a welcoming committee to terrorists, drug runners and illegals at this time which is totally unsafe.

      • mickey2

        And over throwing the Constitution has allowed this. Paul is FOR the Constitution.

        If the countries want military protection, then they pay for it.

    • Roxanna

      By all means …..go sign yourself up!! Our boarders are open to all that want to harm us, not even an honest attempt to keep them out and your worried about something our missiles can take out over a 10 mile radius on every shore? Since you want our young men and women kept in other countries indefinitely, sign up and help! All those sitting on the sidelines wanting our troops deployed indefinitely….sign up yourselves! WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE. Defend our homeland and our citizens….period. We are a weak nation NOW, we need time to build up to the strength we had years ago.

    • freedomlover

      How in the world are our troops keeping you safe by being in foreign countries? They need to be on home soil to protect us. I suppose you are all for the homeland security as well. Another one that listens to the media instead of doing your own thinking.

    • KH

      You mean you support bankrupting America so the US can police the world. Now that’s some kind of conservatism there.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      if we had a stronger defense HERE we might not have had 9/11 occur.

    • K P Smith

      Again– Correct assessment on all counts

  • John

    Ron Paul is good in most of his ideas, but the one that really, really, scares me is his foreign policy, of walking/talking softly to hostile countries. Other than that, he’s OK. I’m not sure if he can show a great of debating skill against O’Bama, like I think Newt, or Mitt could.

    • Ron

      This in my opinion, Iowa will be the last flash in the pan for Ron Paul, as he will not come close in states like South Carolina. The people in South Carolina are smarter than to go for Ron Paul.

      • Dennis

        I live in SC. I’m voting for Ron Paul. Watch. He will gain more support here after he wins Iowa.

        • Dave

          I’m in SC as well and I’m voting Paul.

          Gingrich= Romney= Obama

        • Roxanna

          I also believe….he is gaining MORE support daily. He believes in OUR country, OUR citizens and OUR Constitution.

        • Annie

          Paul is too extreme in his views and I question his debating capability. Gingrich is more logical and would be a great debater with Obama with his quick, logical thinking and his vast knowledge on all subjects that a president should have.

          • mickey2

            And Newt is under Pelosi’s thumb. She will either destroy him (lol, she was in on that ethics committee) or allow him to run. Still = obama win.

            Nope the only thing that threatens both parties is the Constitution. RP is only the messenger.

          • Roxanna

            SO, your going with another “smooth” talker? Haven’t you learned by Obama? Dr. Paul has a steadfast record in supporting the American Citizens. PLEASE, don’t fall for another “smooth” talker. Look at his record, how much tax dollars did you put in Newts pocket for the bail outs? Not to mention he was admonished as Speaker of the House for 93 ethics violations. He is for himself.

        • Ron

          Iran took the 50 Embassy employees, because that is who Iran is, they are terrorist.. So now you are saying it was Americas fault that Iran took the hostages and kept them imprisoned for 444 days? And I guess you are one of the one’s that would say 911 was America’s fault too? You need to find you another country to live in, as I do not view you has being a patriotic American.

      • Jt

        Surprise, surprise. Someone without any evidence to offer, who clearly has not done their research and does not understand Paul’s policies, is insulting my intelligence for supporting him. I’ve never seen that one before.

      • Patriot 101

        Few people take the selection of a president more serious than Iowans! We aren’t much “smarter” (your words) than most, but probably better studied and informed than most and right now RON PAUL’S message of “Restore America Now” is what we are begining to understand as the best way to “fix” the problems this country is in.
        Iowans are understanding that FREEDOM is going to be the # 1 issue in 10 months. FREEDOM is under attack from the president and congress right now, and we must return to constitutionally limited government.
        On December 14, the House passed the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). On December 15, the Senate followed suit – ironically on Bill of Rights Day.
        Obama will sign it into law. The measure ends constitutional protections for everyone, including US citizens. Specifically it targets due process and law enforcement powers.
        This law allows the president to order the military to arrest anyone for any reason anywhere, including you in your home.
        If this isn’t a bigger issue than “jobs” let me know.
        Ron Paul for FREEDOM!

        • mickey2

          Exactly. While some are arguing for “looks presidential” or who is the “best debater” or who has the “money” to beat obama, they are ignoring the most basic value–our Constitution.

          repubs are no longer repubs with McCain sponsoring “legal martial law”.

        • David

          I think that whoever voted for the NDAA should be voted out of office.

        • David

          That is the most intelligent thing I’ve seen posted all day!!

      • KH

        Yeah we need another big government, elitist, establishment, neocon like Newt Gingrich to run the country. Give me a break. Don’t you people read history or do you just ignore it when it’s convenient?

      • paulsupporter onceagain

        until you understand or read Blowback you do not understand things.

        Think of it this way… if another country came and occupied us how would we feel. If they threw out our govt, walked the streets carrying high powered weapons, and told us what to do with curfews some of us would not like it. And if they blew up our buildings, injured our children, and harmed adults – we would not like it.

        So what are we doing in countries that do NOT want us there?

        I have yet to run into one person who is willing to pay their share to balance the current spending levels. We are screwing future generations over with massive debts. The kids will live with their parents forever due to paying those monstrous taxes. If we do not stop the spending immediately this is not going to end well.

        Look at Greece and ZImbabwe as examples. They over spent. Look at Germany in the mid 1940′s and how their military became too expensive. And Rome and the former Soviet Union. We now spend more than the entire world combined. So much that we will soon have to eliminate all social services. If we want to save social services (medicaid, medicare, soc sec) we have to reduce military spending. Or else we need to increase taxes around 60 percent for everyone

    • Michael

      Dr. Ron Paul is following our Constitution.

      • Millicent

        Congressman Ron Paul is a disgrace to America. Antisemitic old crow who is a big phony. America would be a bigger laughing stock if this old geezer got into the WH than it is now with Obama. I can’t wait til his is in the history books as the idiot he is.

        • http://conservativebyte Robert

          If he’s so anti-semitic, how come Benjamin Netanyahu agrees with his ideas? You’re an idiot!

        • Roxanna

          Mill……Must be a liberal……look at allll the name calling when backed in a corner. Is that the best you can do? No support?? No research? HA! Facts and truth will prevail!!

        • mickey2

          Yeah, and we are getting more posts from overseas that wonder why the US is willing to give up its Constitution so easily.

        • blindenoughtosee

          Dear Millicent tell the dead troops and their family we do not want to be a laughing stock? Those troops deserve to die so we can look good? I guess we really need a president who will just nuke all other nations ?Then we will be safe from laughter right?Those other nations who do not obey our commands deserve to die like the filth they are ?Only we Americans deserve to live and be happy.How many of your family are you willing to let die for lies of W.M.D,S if you remember there was a no fly zone in Iraq north and south .How could they fly over here and bomb us?All of their radar was taken out by us before the war.God Forbid we let one of our boys or girls die to keep us looking good.They would prefer being laughed at right now.at least they would be alive .I would not give one of ours to make you look good or any government or president or congress member.They start the wars let them die in them and leave our troops out of policing the world .Please let them come home and rest?or send your family to take their places on the front lines and you and yours can make us look good.May God Bless You .

    • Gale

      I just hope the Republicans and Libertarians aren’t split! That would GIVE obama the election!

      • Jt

        You’ve touched upon the reason why, this year, the only candidate who CAN win is Ron Paul. His supporters will NEVER support an establishment candidate. No other candidate can POSSIBLY get enough support in general election.

      • Dave

        If you don’t want that you would be wise to support Ron Paul.

      • Charlotte Juett

        Democrats are leaving their party to vote for Ron Paul, Independents support him and you think that “Obama” can beat him. Ron Paul is the one candidate that can UNITE this country again. In his unblemished record of supporting the Constitution and taking his oath of office more seriously than anyone in Congress today, he is FOR Liberty for the American populace, not more governmental control which can only lead to disaster for this country.

      • Annie

        Agree. If the conservative vote is split in 2012, Obama is a shoe-in and America can say… “Hello, socialism”.

        • AZJEFF1963

          your the same dimwhits that kept saying “when mitt wins Iowa you Paul bot’s better jump on the band wagon or your going to split the vote” WELL now that DR Paul is winning….now what?

          • Annie

            I will not vote for Obama. I will vote for the conservative that is chosen, but if it be Ron Paul, I strongly doubt that he will be elected president… he is not a strong leader.

    • Sackett

      PRESIDENT’S have ADVISERS. What the he– do you think obummer’s “experience” was/is ?
      At least Ron Paul is intelligent enough that he would listen to those advisers and he would pick intelligent people for those positions and not “appoint” 100+ czars of this /n that so he could take umpteen vacations and go golfing.

    • john

      Who cares if someone can debate or not, get someone in there with ideas to help this country. The press will jump all over Gingrich for wanting to arrest some federal judges, but ignore what is happening in Arizona and Alabama to law enforcement officers trying to keep illegals out of our country. I also agree with Gingrich that the Supreme Court should not have the Supreme power that they seem to want to wield. That is not, and never was their purpose. BTW, i would rather a good debater than a good bu-l shi–er like berrack hussain. I’ve had enough jive talking from our so called president. Lets get a real president.

      • Bill

        I agree with you John,
        People better understand whats at stake here with our next election either you want the government to control 95% or your life and everything you do with it /or / you want the right to control it yourself!

        As the question on a good debater or a good bull Sh**$R o I would also take a good debater however a good bullshi***r will always win because he’s talking to the majority of people who are always UN informed and un knowledgable on most issues! thats why we have to get everyone we know involved in this next election and tell everyone we know how important it is and WHY! It wasnt the well informed who put him in office remember that! we have to change that and then we’ll “Win”
        Bill

    • charles

      Newt/Mitt = NWO whores, get it??

    • Louis

      John,
      Think of it like this. Lets say your neighbor is involved in some illegal activity. Should you go over to his place and clean house, drop your “bombs”, threaten him, invade his property and say you are only protecting your home by doing so???? No you get the right people involved to do it. We have no business in invading foreign lands because they are “bad” If and when they make a move against the U.S. then you will want to take action. Lets hope we are not financially bankrupt to wage a full scale war when we need to. Paul will save this country trillions thus making our military secure and have them home where we need them.

  • Insurgent

    ANYBODY——————– but the illegal LFN from Mombasa, Kenya!

    • Gale

      You would think!

  • Terry Black

    Voters need to face the fact, that the simple truth is that the other nominees carry a globalist agenda, hence Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich – while Michelle Bachmann is off on a tangent about Muslims!

    Perhaps there may be some merit to that problem – but the truth here is that the Muslims who took part in 911 have proven since to have been on the CIA payroll, eg. Osama Bin Laden, so in other words these Muslims were bought and paid for to become the “Boogeyman”, scapegoat for the global oligarchs’ plan of launching the “One World Government”, agenda into the operative phase of the actual beginning of the take down of America!

    Bachmann would do well to remember that without help in high places it is very difficult for a backwards uneducated people to set up, such a technological take down of two Twin Towers – Building 7 and the Pentagon – over what was supposed to be highly secure restricted air space!

    If I were Bacmann I wouldn’t be as concerned with the Muslim enemy as the Traitors inside our own government, who are running scared and passing legislation that puts a once free USA, into the same Police State league as North Korea! Re: Indefinite Detention and China style Internet censorship!

    An interesting article to Google is – New Poll: Ron Paul Leads In Iowa, Gingrich Imploding

    • Paul Brown

      You must have been in Kenya when 9-11 took place. There were no US Jets in the sky till way after the first plane hit the towers and then after they did get up went the wrong way for 20 minutes, allowing the second plane to hit the towers and Pentagon and the ground. no plane hit tower 7. I think your term, ” what was supposed to be secure/restricted air space”, is the most correct. Backwords my ass. Anyone that believes this needs to wake up.

      • Gale

        Do you really think if the US did it that they would advertise in their own jets? Have you seen the pictures of the plane that hit the Pentagon? Did you notice it didn’t have wings?

        • john

          BS Gale

        • candi

          how did people that lived there see the plane flying so low, it seems to me it would be hard to fly without wings…you are kooky…

    • Ralph

      Sounds like another Ron (“The Weasel”) Paul nut job to me!
      Conspiracy here, conspiracy there, conspiracy everywhere!

      • john

        Ask Ron Paul who bombed the WTC towers. It was George Bush. Just ask him.

        • charles

          John

          Don’t be stupid – it was a Made in Isra-hell JOB!

      • Donna Gamble

        Exactly Ralph’ I’m begining to get VERY AFRAID’ Too many ignorant,nutjobs on here that would vote for Paul. He has not made one
        senseable comment in a debate,he rambles,wont answer questions put to him,and has “Weird ” ideas. Supporting the Consitution is a given for any President (except Obama I guess),but we need a TRUE AMERICAN for President.I really don’t think there’s one running this time.

      • Robert Stone

        and you sir are blind . Read history. (Myron C Fagan.com)

    • ABnOK

      We would do well not to diminish the left-wing threats inside our government or those outside the country. Both are equally as dangerous in different ways but to the same end. Beware of taking our eyes off or softening our stance with either.

    • RW

      Where are your sourses for your statements Terry?…Just another consiracy ?….Sourse where the muslims where on the payroll. You are just like most of the Ron Paul supporters…Statements without facts

      • RW

        Oppps…Spelling…

    • Herb

      Some people believe anything. I just can’t see how our government could have done 9-11.Think about it. Can you imagine the number of people at differant levels that would have been involved in this. After 10 years somebody on the inside would have come out with real evidence by now. Something this big could not stay secret this long. Clinton could not get a BJ in the oval office without the world finding out about it. How in the heck do you think they pulled off 9-11 without somebody talking.

      • mickey2

        Gee, how many years has it been that people don’t realize we knew about the Jews in Germany and did nothing. That Roosevelt also knew about the Japanese going to Hawaii, stood down so we would have an excuse to fight Japan?

        Israel told us about 911 and who would be involved, yet no action taken.

        I find it hard to believe our planes, a hop skip and a jump away from NY were on “training stand down”?

        True, at the time I was shocked. Bringing those buildings down in such a matter and listening to people close to the time, I reviewed other plane crashes. Wouldn’t happen without some sort of explosives planted.

        I looked at the Pentagon, a hole about the size of my house. Impossible. I’m familiar with the path they said the plane took. Would have to be an expert not to take out the lights, cars, etc.

        Hard to believe our own govenment might be involved. Then an unexpected happened–we united, no color, no dem, no repub, just US citizens. The establishment has been separating us into groups, more so, ever since.

      • Robert Stone

        Its easy to deceive a stupid government news media brainwashed people. They ll believe anything their gov or media tell them; while they steal your rights, your economy and your foreign policy.. and poof… its gone

  • http://conservativebyte.com bulldog dude

    Had Gingrich not been so smug…so arrogant in the past couple of weeks , he might still be riding that high horse. I’ll bet a “Pay-Per-View” of an obama and gingrich debate would bring in more revenues than the last heavy weight prize fight.

    • BurkeVA

      Smug? Arrogant? How about a confident leader? Under Newt’s LEADERSHIP, the GOP won the House for the first time in 40 years, balanced the budget for 4 straight years and implemented Welfare Reform, with Clinton the president. That’s what a LEADER does. What he also does is POff a lot of people who don’t like to work or take risks. Not many liked Winston Churchill, either. Newt is being destroyed, not by Democrats, but by jealous and angry RINOs, who care only about themselves and their own power. And about the $1.8 million over 6 years from Freddy, Dems took out hundreds of millions! We had better start focusing upon getting a LEADER in the Oval Office, or none of us will have the chance to write comments like these!

      • Annie

        Agree!

      • mickey2

        The Constitution belongs to all of us–for now.

      • candi

        i love newt, and you are so right, so many of these jealous people running against him… michelle b. makes me sick . and romney also. jealous, jealous, period…. go newt… americans seem to always want to pick losers.

  • Naplesjim

    I thought the people of the USA were starting to awaken but it looks like they have been drinking more of the kool-aide. I believe Ron Paul would be a disaster to the our security of our nation.

    • Gale

      It can’t be much worse. The millions of illegals. Maybe he will bring our industries back to America. We are like the South in the Civil War, no factories to build our own weapons or anything for that matter.

    • Edward Levy

      I am inclined to agree. One disaster after another.

      We would be between a rock and a hard place if it comes down to Obama vs. Paul.

      ANY 3rd party would certainly be a sure win for the our current CZAR

    • Robert Young

      Maplesjim, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I believe Ron Paul is the only one of the Candidates that has a workable plan for America. His plan cuts One Trillion Dollars from the Federal deficit the first year, abolishes redundant Government Agencies and Departments, ends Foreign Aid, gets the U.S. out of the U.N. and gives We, the People a balanced budget by his third year in office. No other Candidate offers so much. However, We, the Voters must elect a House and Senate controlled by Constitutional Conservatives along with Ron Paul for President for this to happen.

      • Sumerian Man

        Words of Wisdom

    • charles

      Naplesjim. Helllooo clueless, READ OUR CONSTITUTION before you open your mouth again!

    • Annie

      Paul is too extreme. Our country should be ruled based on the Constitution. Gingrich will do this and has the record of accomplishments that prove his ability.

      • mickey2

        Excuse me? RP is all about the Constitution.

        • Annie

          I did not intend to insinuate that Ron Paul was not for a Constitutionally based government in America because he is a very strong believer in the constitution…. he is too radical in some of his beliefs and would not be a strong leader.

          • paulsupporter onceagain

            what do you consider being radical?

            I like the idea of following the constitution. Its the law of the land.

  • Dingle

    Newt is a vote for the New World Order and Federal Reserve. Who do you think has propped him up in the media? The people can’t be fooled that easily.

    • OT 4 bHo

      YOU’RE A PARANOID, SUSPICIOUS DICKle.

    • Ralph

      Just another one of Ron (“The Weasel”) Paul’s cult members.

      • charles

        Ralph

        What an intelligent reply. NOT!

  • richard

    people need to take stock. the only thing anyone who votes ought to be concerned with is, who out of all the candidates has the best chance of beating obama. it certainly is not paul. jesus man, get a grip out there. what the hell are conservatives thinking??????????????????????????????????????????????????

    • Ralph

      So true!

    • Gale

      They aren’t thinking! That’s just it! It’s just a game for publicity. obama didn’t get voted in. He is just a puppet for the Powers That Be that PUT him in there! Our votes don’t count anyways. Those PTB just like everyone to think they have something to do with it so we don’t realize we are getting conditioned to be in a dictator/communist controlled country. We are only sheeple.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      the people who can read and think for themselves are noticing that the REAL CONSERVATIVE is Dr. Ron Paul. Look at his voting record.. He was against Iraq war (4500 of our brave troops are dead and 20,000 injured). He has been speaking up about the federal reserve (a private bank that enriches several special people). He wants a balanced budget. He has a plan to reduce spending. Who else is talking about serious spending reductions? Ans is NO ONE.

      He should win the nomination as the Grand Old Party is over. Done. Its enriched the elites as has the Dem party. And the worker bees are the ones carrying the water.

      He does not want to control other people’s lives. If you want to be controlled enlist and see what its like.

  • Pat

    Paul is dangerous & will not do a good job & he will not beat obama if he is the one. I am sad to see what is happening to the Rs again, it happened when they stupidly put an old worn out man like McCain in & here they are even considering another one????

  • shawn corrigan

    the reason ron paul is surging is because he is right, or more correctly constitutional liberty and abundance are right. ron paul fights for the respect of our founding documents, newt is 2 faced. he may be different now, but i would not want to bet the nation and the world on it. you see the whole world has benefitted from the example of freedom and prosperity america has provided thru the constitution through the past 2 centuries, many leaders have strayed from it,ron paul wants to bring us back. all healthy people love freedom. it is a message that will win. communistic welfare and the totalitarian obama message has many lazy wimpy peoples support i believe most are smarter than that. he is surging in the polls. the establishment hates this, the bilderberg ,council on foreign relations,united nations ,tri-lateral commission ,which newt is part of hates this. vote to give the power back to the people , vote for ron paul !!!

    • Sandy

      Agreed, tired of these nervous nellies always crying about needing another RINO in order to beat the democruds. More of the same, another Bush, another Bush, another McPain, another Gingrich who sells out his wife for a buck.
      Wake up, this old vet says it’s time to stop pissing off the world with our troops in every country. Read the Constitution and Declaration of Independance, then read Washington’s Farewell Address as well as the Federalist papers and the many letters between Adams and Jefferson. Our foreign policy is a disaster and unconstitutional. We need constructionism and that “Goofy old man” is the only TRUE conservative in the race, other than governor Johnson.
      So long as we get the insiders in office (white house AND congress), we will continue sliding into the destruction of our country.

      • Edward Levy

        I guess you did not see him IMPLODE on the FOX debate

    • Michael

      Right on Shawn. There are too many dem comments on this site. They’re wasting time, their own.

    • Annie

      Paul believes in a Constituitionally based government, which it should be, but Ron Paul is not a leader. We must have a strong leader, quick thinker, knowledgeable re. all that a president needs to have knowledge in…. This is Gingrich.

      • mickey2

        Excuse me but all the other candidates changed their tune to reflect the Constituion, following RP. lol, they stumble over the very words they swore alligence to.

      • blindenoughtosee

        Dear Annie Newt cheated the American people with fannie mae and freddy mac ? cheated on three of his wives ?But I know he will always look out for your best interest ? Judged Bill Clinton for cheating while he was doing the same ?Now that is knowledge ? how to come out on top every time?played up to Nancy on climate change a real republican conservative ?Ready to look out for you like Bill O Riley on fox news ?say anything to get in a girls pants say anything to get elected? That is a fast thinker you are right ?If he is not faithful to his own family why do you think he would be faithful to all of us?I hope he loves us more than he did his wives ??????????????

  • Ray Bruinius

    The Democrats have got to smiling! The Repubs are self destructing with no help or effort from them. Makes one want to despair at the prospect of 4 more years of Barak. When will the right get their act together?

  • Robert Hodgins

    Ron Paul is a distraction. Romney is a Rino. Bachman is a bomb thrower. Santorum and Gingrich are the true strenght that America needs to regain the USA. The lame stream media and Paul are enemies of the state.

    • Thad Skantowski

      Ron Paul is against the unconstitutional acts of war and policing of the us armed services all over the world. Bring the troops home. Build up our tech and then go to war in a Constitutional manner with vigor and nothing but victory. He has voted for the Constitution on every vote. You people are dumb arses and have no clue. Stick to your MSM and eat your grass…SHEEP

    • http://www.hamptonbush.com Charles Bush

      You know, the one man with the least amount of baggage, the calmest man on the stage in debates, the one person who has stuck by his conservative principles without wavering is Rick Santorum. I agree that Rick and Newt are the best choice and hope for the future. Newt is suffering from a massive media attack from both the right and and left. Some of the attacks from the right are subtle but attacks nontheless. These attacks amaze me. Some are vicious, which you would expect from the left, but not from the right. Ann Coulter, Karl Rove, even some of the Fox “objective” guys are taking subtle cuts at Newt. What is it that causes them to do that. Could it be they’re quietly big-government Republicans? Me thinks something smells here, and it ain’t rotting fish.

      • Dennis

        Santorum talks out of the side of his mouth. No way.

      • Annie

        I have noticed the same. Could it be they want to split the conservative vote. Seems to be happening.

      • mickey2

        Well, let’s not discount Pelosi threatening to spill the beans on Newt, since she was in on the ethics committee. Newt didn’t deny she had dirt, just she shouldn’t be telling tales ourside of school. Then there is plenty of information out there on the net.

      • blindenoughtosee

        Dear Charles H.W.Bush Why do something you would be ashamed of and expect it should be forgotten? Newt could have had a clean record like Ron Paul if he would have kept his vows ?Ask his wives if he is true to his word and he should not be blamed for the things he actually did ?If you do not like the truth told just don:t do anything against the truth ?If you hurt someone they will tell what you did because it hurts?No one is lying on the man he actually done all those things and got caught at it ?What you should consider is what he got away with no one knew about?How far would he have gone if he had not got caught , How much worse would this country be now if he would have stayed in office?He got us in these wars with the Bushes and bankrupt our nation ?How much are you willing to steal from our youth? They deserve a better country ? Born a slave, owe taxes for being born for something they never voted for .Newt voted for them to pay when they get their first job ?they bring home 33% of their pay because state ,federal , fica , ss, medicare, then out of the 33% they pay food tax gas tax phone tax tv tax property tax insurance tax ect! Whats left for them except do it till you die?Quit selling your children out for a slob who does not care about your future or your children:s God Bless Ron Paul for keeping his vows..

  • Steve

    No way in hell that real conservatives vote for Paul. His foreign policy is worse than Obama’s.

    • Gale

      No, obama’s is arrogant! At least Ron Paul would PROUDLY represent his country! Where obama has embarassed it badly! Obama has no clue what he’s doing. He’s just somebody’s illegal puppet “playing” president.

      • Michael

        I thought o was trying to play golf.

    • RW

      What foreign policies? He has none

    • mickey2

      Ever question why the conservatives won’t stand behind the person of vote? Of all the candidates, the conservatives will embrace any of them but Paul? Think it has to do with both sides signing the NDAA?

      The foreign policy Paul stands behind can be found in the Constitution, it is a free document and we can read it without having to have Pelosi’s stamp.

    • blindenoughtosee

      Dear Steve Ron Paul fought for this country and kept our boys patched up from the wars your conservatives started ? Bless God that is foreign policy. kill and cripple as many of our boys and girls as you can with your needless wars of lies and Ron will still try to patch up as many as he could to keep them alive ?He is the only real conservative that did not change or waver his vows look at his voting record?Bless God and Bless Ron Paul just wish I was half the man he is for the good he has done for our country and not wavering on truth.And I pray to God that he would please let a nation who threw him out let us have Ron Paul for our president .USA does not truly deserve such a good man .so God PLEASE forgive and have mercy own our children who we have showed no mercy .Like Ron Paul has showed for us and them thank you Lord.

  • leisureal

    I agree! With his ridiculous foreign policy stand, we would be a target for attack-he says Iran is NO THREAT. They just want nukes like everyone else??? How insane-and he says no evidence that Iran is working on Nuclear weapon?????
    Kiss your behind goodbye if Paul becomes president!

    • JoJo

      True, but we also have to start guarding our southern border since Hezbola or however you spell it is currently setting up shop right across the border…They’ve been in south america for a long time, but they are working with the Mexican drug cartels and I’m sure that it would be no effort whatsoever for Iran to get that nuke shipped to Mexico and have a few left over for Israel. If the ACLU, and all the other liberal bleeding hearts can’t make the connection as to how dangerous this is, I don’t know what will.

    • charles

      leisureal,

      Yes that is RIGHT – there is NO evidence at all. But the media has brainwashed you with its lies. Another SHEEPLE here!

    • mickey2

      Would you buy a gun if you were surrounded by your neighbors who were all armed (backed by the US) and threatening you? Even Bachmann doesn’t want to go into Pakistan because they have “nukes”.

  • know better

    Simply “NO” Ron Paul !! Bachman could and may do much better than Ron could ever do.She is right on track with the Muslim thing. America better wake up and see the light ? Terry is way off base in his thoughts about her.

  • kenneth

    Ron Paul scares me . he is way too conservative with many of his views. he also comes across at times when he talks as if his cheese has slid off the cracker. He may be a great person but he does not have what it takes to run this country during these times.
    We need someone with experience who will also stand behind his decisions. We also need someone who will be able to get congress to work together and work with him. You can not run around blaming someone else for your lack of ability and then expect them to back you up.

    • Thad Skantowski

      Stand behind decisions. He is the only consistant voter in Congress. Newt? He is a phony cheat that stabs every voter in the back. You are a joke Kenneth.

    • http://www.hamptonbush.com Charles Bush

      Look, as one who has listened to Ron Paul for years, I truly admire the man for sticking to his principles without wavering. He is right in his stance about the Federal Reserve system. He is right in his assessment that America should not be the world’s police department. About 8,000 boys got killed in IRAQ and another 50,000 seriously wounded. And a legitimate question is why. Saddam Hussein was surrounded by our no-fly zone. He couldn’t really hurt us. If he tried, we could have vaporized his country. Ditto for Afghanistan. We are $70 trillion in debt and going deeper by about $1.5 trillion + every year. So why do we maintain 900 bases around the world, including England, Germany, Japan, Korea and many others where the countries are our friends.
      I agree with Ron Paul on those things make no sense from a pure logic standpoint. How about letting the French, Italians, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Germany defend themselves? We are like a poor man with ragged underwear and holes in his shoes running around pretending we are rich. Why?

      Ask yourself who profits from soaking Americans? Could it be the internationalist bankers in the Federal Reserve, the people who gain the interest on the money we borrow? Read, think. Don’t take your thoughts from the talking heads. I pray for a “real” small-government conservative to help save our country. Or I hope I die before the country I love so is gone.

      • RW

        Once again the statements with no facts….8ooo killed in Iraq?…Try 4400+. Do some freaking research before you open your keyboard. You look like an idiot with statements like that

        • AZJEFF1963

          if it were 10 it would be to freeking many moron.

    • Gale

      We need a whole new line up for president, Congress, the House, all the way down! And they need to be REAL AMERICANS WHO WILL FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION!

  • Jerry F.

    I don’t take to much into the day to day poll,and there is still over 50% of Iowa and the nation that have not decided.I see it this way,Newt will win Iowa,South Carolina,and Florida,Romney will win New Hampshire and the rest of the canidates will start falliong out.RP.will last one to go.And we better get behind who ever wins,that means you RP.and Huntsman followers or we can start calling Obama Hugo Chavez Jr. cause thats the way he will take us if he wins.

    • Dennis

      Fox News scares you…and all of us.

    • AZJEFF1963

      And when RP wins who will you fall in line big mouth?

      • blindenoughtosee

        I like your ways AZJEFF1963 and your words keep up the good work .

  • Pablo

    Ron Paul will kill the elections. The man is totally out of his mind. This will be a big mistake. I am not so against Gringrich, he has a pretty good resume and he knows the insides of Washington and the caca of the senators and from where they care coming from. Romney is another McCain, too sold to leftist ideas. Santorum is great! I would love to see his numbers go up. Michelle comes out like too much of “a goodie 2 shoes” and makes statements without checking th background. So let us trust in God and let the best man/woman win!

    • charles

      Pablo

      Yes Newt knows the inside of Washington as he is a WASHINGTON INSIDER!!!

      Please USE YOUR BRAIN!

      Nothing will change if you vote for a Washington insider with NWO ties!! GET IT???

      • Pablo

        Charles, I use it. I hope it was Santorum but he needs $$$$$$, I cant help with much….so you prefer the crazy old man, it will be landslide for obama, my independent group will be abstaining, you will create another Goldwater’s fiasco. Come to your senses!

        • mickey2

          Read the Constitution, realize nearly 3/4 of Congress and only 7 senators DIDN’Tvote for NDAA, and tell me how this messenger of the Constitution is a crazy old man. Bush depended upon it and so is obama.

          Pay attention to the Bill of Rights. NDAA took care of what was left.

          • blindenoughtosee

            mickey2 you are right you looked at the vote you are blindenough to see that is why you can not be fooled again by all the words without meaning or truth .

  • Larry Price

    The people of Iowa have done the one thing no one else has been able to do, make the Iowa straw poll totally insignicant.

  • jakebrake

    And all this time I thought people from Iowa were smart. But to each his own and they voted for Obombnic.

    • Annie

      With the people in Iowa supporting Ron Paul (his beliefs are great, but too extreme), I now begin to wonder what others have said that Iowa stands for Idiots Only Walking Around.

  • OT 4 bHo

    OT 4 bHo is short for One Term for baraqa HUSSEIN obamma. Yes, I know that’s not how he spells it. The Arab-Muslim part of him is shoiwing loud and clear in all that he’s doing to DESTROY our Western ways. This is why I’ll vote for A N Yone running against bHUSSEINo.
    But if that person whould turn out to be Ron Paul, I will still be AFRAID ! I realize that Ron is a very sincere person, and goes by the Constitution, which I love. He means well. His supporters are adamant in their support of him, which is also heartwarming; such a refreshing change from “supporters” who tear down the person they’ll be voting for eventually….

    Here is the part that scares me: He wants to be nice to Iran. Iran is like a dog with RABIES. Even the Dog Whisperer can’t w0ork his miracles on a rabid dog.
    Being nice to Iran and trying (TRYing ) to reason with them is like tying to teach a rabid dog to Sit, Stay, Come. It can’t be done. IT SHOULD’T BE TRIED !!!

    • charles

      OT 4,

      ANOTHER SHEEPLE of the MSM. Iran has never in its history attacked another nation! Leave them alone WARMONGER!!

  • LarryG

    Too bad Jeb Bush’s last name is Bush. Many people wouldn’t listen to him just because of that.

  • know better

    Where is Sarah Palin when this country needs her ????? She is the Only way out of this mess that B.O.has made.Like everything B.O. does,it Stinks !!

    • USAMYCOUNTRY

      know better……. YES ….YES…..WHERE IS SARAH WHEN WE NEED HER……???????I AM SENDING HER A XMAS CARD TO WASILLA ALASKA…….PLEASE SARAH ….WE NEED YOU SO MUCH……. STEP UP DEAR LADY AND YOU WILL SEE THE WHOLE THING MAKE THE SWING THAT WE ARE SO DEPERATLY NEEDING…..

  • Robert Hodgins

    OMG is no longer what you think, it has a whole new meaning !
    “OBAMA MUST GO”

    How do you starve an Obama supporter ??
    It’s really very simple,
    just hide their food stamps under their work shoes.

  • Michael

    TerryBlack – do you honestly believe with any of your being that a Ron Paul nomination wouldn’t hand a second term to the current poser-in-chief? It is not a globalistic mindset to understand the security risk to our ally Israel – as well as ourselves – if Iran is allowed to pursue development of a nuclear weapon. Ron Paul seems to be dillusional about the intent of the radical regime in its development of such a weapon. Bachmann is absoutely correct about the intent of radical Islam. Islam is NOT – I repeat NOT – a religion of peace. It’s goal is globalization of Sharia. If that’s what you are looking for – you couldn’t go wrong with an Obama v Paul general election. Either victor woould assure a far more dangerous world.

    • ctc01

      Michael, I 100% agree with you!

    • charles

      Michael

      Its NOT our job to protect PARASITE Israel!!

  • http://aol.com JimG

    Ron Paul is not suitable to be president. The current field is getting small. Huntsman and Santorum are in the weeds and are power hungry President Want a Bes. M. Bauchman his blown her credibility by attacking her fellow republican candidates. R. Perry seems out of touch with reality at times and while M. Romney and N. Gengrich appear to be the only hope for America at this time, they both have baggage. M. Romney is obviousley being sold to us by the media and hard line republicans and N. Gengrich is being savaged by the media and hard line republicans. The last thing we need is a republican presidential candidate shoved down our collective throats by the MSM media and political hacks. Think about it. N. Gengrich is the only candidate with the knowledge and experience to beat Obama. Obama and the Dems are afraid of Newt and are trying everything they can to dump him out of the running.

    • Pablo

      I couldnt agree with you more. Rinos and liberals cannot do more to destroy Gringrich and unfortunately people do not check facts. I believe that everything behind the story is to push Romney down our throat. I dont trust this man, there is a subliminal message from all liberal channels to convince the indepedents that he is “fair and balanced”, of course, they fail to see that Independents are fed up with socialism, rinos are not helping neither. We are going into a very scary ride. In God we Trust and let the best man win….

      • http://www.hamptonbush.com Charles Bush

        Another thing about Romney. His touted “business experience” he says makes him the most qualified to create jobs. That’s baloney. He never built a business in his life. He’s a venture capitalist who buys and sells businesses. If he thinks they’re viable, he spends money and fixes them up, then sells them. If they’re not, he breaks them up and sells off the pieces. The guys who built Home Depot from scratch and Sam Wall who started with one little store in Arkansas know how to create jobs. Romney is part of the Wall Street money crowd, he’s a monopoly player, not a business builder. And that’s the truth.

  • Viet Nam Vet 67-68

    Ron Paul is the only person that will audit the Federal Reserve and has a plan to balance our budget stop the open printing of Fiat Money devaluing the dollar and reducing the size of Government and eliminating the Dept. of De-Education and brain washing and three other large Government agencies. I don’t see where any person with a brain Republican, Conservative or Reagan Democrat that would take Obamanation over Ron Paul. As far as his Foreign Policy is concerned with a Majority in the Senate and House they would not allow him to do harmful things to our real Allies. I would also like to see Michell Bachmann as Vice President and future President. Two real Conservatives that would bring back our Country and get rid of the New Communist Party and the Illegal Radical Muslim Half Breed Communist Obamanation. Muslims, Freign Policy and bring all of our troops home from around the world all at once would be very bad but again if we gain control of Congress we could override him.

    • martin

      Ron Paul would lose in a landslide. He would have no chance of winning. He would be another Neville Chamberlain.

      • charles

        Martin

        Keep dreaming your delusional dreams!

      • blindenoughtosee

        martin Ron Paul would win in a landslide because his voice for freedom is for all , not Muslims,not Christians, not Blacks ,not Whites ,not Hispanics not men ,not women, for all and all know that he will keep the federal government out of their lives and the state you live in will pass the laws on how you want to live ,That way New York or California or Florida laws will have no effect on the way you live, just who you vote for in your state can change your way of life .I do not believe our people have any problem understanding what Ron Paul is for. Little states have no lobbyist to go to capitol hill when they pass the laws for big states. They sell out all the little states and cram all those lobbyist laws on the rest of us and call it the law of the land . We do not need California laws here in W.V. all we want is to be left alone we know what is best for us .

      • Patriot 101

        Martin,
        Take a look at reputable polls of Ron Paul vs: Obama. You will be surprised.
        The only people that are saying Ron Paul would lose to Obama are Mainstream Republican hacks that continue to give us Big Government, war propagating candidates (McCain, Dole, Bush for examples)!

    • Dottie1929

      Hey
      I agree with Viet Nam Vet 100%. Just wish more Americans were as sharp.

      vietnam

    • 1949

      YOUR RIGHT BUT ANYBODY BUT OBAMA. THEN WE DEAL WITH THE NEW PRESIDENT

    • Karl

      You are right on! I agree with you 100%

    • Karl

      Im trying to reply to Vietnam vet 67-68. He is absolutly right on the money. Ron Paul with Michele Bachman is the only winning combination that can bring back our country from this communist government that we have now. I rest my case.

  • ctc01

    As an ex-Marine, I know Ron Paul would be dangerous to our country. He would see that America has no protection at all from the outside and that is very dangerous to America. No protection within or without with RON PAUL. Anything would go within because he believes in rights for everyone. We have crazies in this country of which he is one. What are the Iowa voters thinking? I for one go for Newt Gingrich who I believe could clean out Washington. He has the guts to do it, too.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      I too am a veteran.

      We have an offense overseas. I would rather have a stronger defense. American boots on American soil on OUR borders. Instead we are protecting borders all around the planet.

      We cannot afford it. The neocons in this country have to prove their point and pay lots higher taxes. That will show credibility.

      As for Iran – how can we trust what the press is spoon feeding us? One person made that claim. We were told WMD in Iraq… where were they?

      This is what few people realize.. when a country does NOT accept dollars they are declared our enemy. Central bankers want control of the world. They don’t care about young kids getting shot up. the military industrial complex wants wars for their bottom line. If they create a false flag event too many people get fooled into agreeing to go to war. Follow the money.

    • charles

      CTC01, Newt clean out Washington? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Thanks for the laugh of the day oh clueless one!

  • mayeeden

    Paul and Bauchman are the only 2 candidates who are patriots and love this country. Perry andf Gingrich are both CFR members and I believe Romney has the CFR running his campaign. Type in Council on Foreign Relations CFR into google search and learn who these people are, who founded this private globalist group, and what their goals are for America. Type CFR next to the names of the top RINOS and the Bush’s, Obama, etc… and you will see that they have been running the show for decades no matter which party the winning candidates come from. Even the major controlled media is run by their members. Vote someone in who’s hands are clean and whose hearts are towards their country, Freedom and the American people or else, the Bush/Obama Hell will continue to advance according the the CFR plan. The CFR is why nothing ever changes. See their footprints running all through American policy at home and abroad and warn everyone you can.

  • tommyzax

    Ron Paul for Treasury Secretary!

    I know she’s not all there, but Michelle Bachmann is the most conservative and very consistent. I know the bash that she’s neocon, but that seems like conjecture.

    I still like Herman Cain, even though everyone thinks he’s a Fed plant.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      Peter Shiff for secretary of the treasury

  • Miss Vinay Duggal

    Newt Gingrich rules! I’m voting for him.

    • Thad Skantowski

      You must be a progressive. Heavier and lighter than the POTUS. Slow down our destruction with that vote Miss Duggal

    • mickey2

      He self professes to be a progressive.

  • martin

    Wish someone would do poll that asks how many people pay attention to the polls.

  • jim shipley

    The truth often hurts, but don’t blame the messenger. Paul is the only truthful politician i have ever seen.

    • Paul Brown

      You must be all of 10 years old.

      • Avon

        And a child shall lead the way!

  • Donna Roberts

    I don’t believe these poll results for a minute. This sounds like the news media tweaking things to come out their way. They’d love to have Ron Paul as the republican candidate against Obama. Conservatives should stand strong. All that counts is the election.

  • Child Abusing Judge’s.

    Ron Paul is the only chance we have to fix all of the Damage that President Obama, and his Cabinet has done to America and no one in the world trust us anymore. Our Government can’t even follow our own Constitution; our politicians break it every day!! Ron Paul follows the Constitution and never violates it like Washington Does! Ron Paul has my vote! Because he wouldn’t sell his soul to the Devil or sell our County out either!

  • Susie

    There were quite a number of pro-Ron Paul ‘protesters’ at Occupy Wall Street. Paul is so far right he slides over with the anarchists. All his good positions are worthless in this context.

    • mickey2

      We are all part of the 99% to some extent, they just did it by destroying public property, very offensive, but they do have some legitmate agruments.

  • Bruce

    That you Iowans vote Ron Paul and stand up for American values and not the establishment that has all of these fools fooled

    • mickey2

      Yes, thank you for listening to the position we either have the Constitution or we don’t. Especially with NDAA signed by both parties–so called conservatives and liberals.

      Read the Bill of Rights and please, please stand behind the only candidate to get rid of NDAA.

  • bill

    So, if Newt and Mitt are part of the New world Order crowd, and Ron Paul and Bachman come off as a little off, who does that leave??? Perry and Santorum. Maybe Santorum should be the guy.

    • Txblkjack

      Governor Perry has 10 years experience governing a REPUBLIC.
      His successful record would be a stark comparison to Obama & the left’s failed agenda.
      He is NOT a globalist and does not support this One World BS.
      He is a conservative and if you have not read his book FED=UP maybe you should.
      He is NOT a RINO or a PROGRESSIVE. He is a true OUTSIDER.
      He is not in the Bush camp. He is not friendly with K Rove & the establishment.
      Strong 2nd Amendment. Strong States Rights. Secure the Border.
      We the People must unite and elect a Center Right candidate in order to beat our foes.
      Ron Paul is not Center Right and will not win in the general election.

  • corace

    Got to remember, it’s Iowa. Lib’s,1/2 lib’s, independents. No way in hell can Paul win other then in Iowa(or some other lib state). He’s a nut! Media, is always going to smear, and they want Paul in to win, since there’s no way he can win.

  • jim shipley

    Over my lifetime, the Feds have stolen 90% of the money we all have earned by printing worthless paper that devalues our dollar. Paul is the only one who would stop it.

    • martin

      Ron Paul is only out for Ron Paul and not for the American People. We all know Obama has to go. If Ron Paul was for American he would support the candidate that wins the nomination if he didn’t win the nomination. He has stated that he would not support any of the other candidates if he didn’t the nomination.
      I will vote for him if he gets the nomination, but I will hold my nose when I vote.

      • paulsupporter onceagain

        Paul has said: “I do NOT want to control your lives like the other politicians do”

      • mickey2

        So my question is, why isn’t the Repub party declaring they will stand behind whoever wins–except Paul. Think it might be the NDAA? the NWO???

  • HRH

    If it’s Paul vs. Obama will that be the first time two anti-Semites from the two major parties have been nominated for President? That’s great. So I get to pick between Jew hater number one and Jew hater number two for President of the United States in 2012.

    • Mark in LA

      You know you guys with your constant braying about anti-Semitism create more “Jew haters” than all the neo-Nazis combined.

  • CaptTurbo

    Michael, I see that you have been paying attention to your network news. You may now have your re-education diploma.

  • Thad Skantowski

    What a bunch of sheep. Gingrich is a cocky POS that flip flops on more issues then your POTUS. What is wrong with going to war under the doctorine of the Constitution? When we go we go with Congressional authority and we go to win. We could save more money by staying out of these proxy wars. Do you think Iran wants to self-destruct with a nuclear attack on any country? Let the MSM guide you sheep into another conflict. Nuclear regulator have not said anywhere that Iran has a hostile nuclear program, unless it was a twisted story by your MSM. You will be the first ones to take the trains to the FEMA camps. Enjoy your short stay there and say good bye to your lives as you know it.

    • http://conservativebyte Robert

      These idiots won’t even admit the FEMA camps are being readied, until they’re marched through the gates!

  • TommyT

    Here we go again. The media is picking a candidate for the Republicans, and one they know cannot defeat Obama. How long are we going to put up with the bias, Socialist news media choosing candidates ? Wake up people. Remember last election when the media gave us McCain ?

  • Tom

    Where is Sarah when we need her? There is no more polarizing conservative than Palin, and we need her in the race. She is the only reason that John McCain came close to winning many states in 2008. ANYBODY BUT OBAMA IN 2012!!!!!

  • Bob Carr

    Palin or Trump come forth!! Romney–flip-flop. Newt arrogant, unlikable. Paul-a looney bird. Huntsman-sensible but doesn’t put forth the effort. Bachman-no money but hope for a miracle. Perry–best choice. Perry/Bachman is the winning team.

  • Tony

    Hey Terry, Get A Life, Man. Michele DID NOT SAY SHE HATED ANYONE. That is Ron Paul starting some Trash. He is NOT the man you want Mamby Pambying around with People who want to take over this Land. You can’t rationalize with Idiots that don’t even have enough self respect to NOT blow themselves up for the sake of Religious Beliefs. Look around, that’s all those IDIOTS believe!

    • mickey2

      No, she just wanted to go bomb them because of the “thought police”.

      Odd, how “muslim” and “Iran” throws away the Constitution immediately.

      Does this sound like the 60′s “oh, the blacks are going to take over”, beat them up, kill them, don’t let them reproduce”. And who made money off that? Gee, Clyburn and Jackson seem pretty well off.

  • Michael Devereux

    Romney and Gingrich are nothing but more of the same big government the establishment GOP has given us for the past 30 years. This country needs a statesman with integrity, not a politician wanting more control of our daily lives.

  • Leon Berton

    How can these stated positions of Ron Paul SCARE anyone who loves the Constitution?

    -follow the Constitution by asking Congress to declare war before one is waged.
    -secure our borders as the top national security priority.
    -avoid expensive land wars that bankrupt us by using constitutional means to capture or kill terrorist leaders who attack the U.S. or who plot further attacks.
    -guarantee our intelligence community’s efforts are directed toward legitimate threats and not spying on or policiing innocent Americans through unconstitutional means.
    -end nation-building that drains military morale, the national treasure, and sacrifices lives needlessly.
    -only send our military into conflict with a clear mission with all they need to complete it, then bring them home and ensure they receive care, benefits, and honors they deserve.
    -revitalize the military for the 21st century by eliminating all waste.
    -stop taking money from our middle class and poor to give to rich dictators through foreign aid.

    As for Iran, he simply would not intrude on a gamble that they MIGHT do ‘x’ or ‘y’ or ‘z’, and by doing so guarantee that the next 2 or 3 generations within Islamic cultures fail to engage the realities of the 21st century. Besides, he has repeatedly said he would let Israel deal with issues in that arena, since not only is Israel totally competent to do so, Israle has the most at stake.

  • rob russell

    Ron Paul debates just fine. Just ask rudy g and a several others who have stood up against him on the ‘debating’ stage. The scary problem is that most folks, yes you, don’t know how to LISTEN when Dr Paul speaks; or better put, only know how to HEAR what they want to hear. As Dr Paul reminds YOU, he is NOT for relaxing america’s defenses, but only for NOT wasting it in places where not needed OR WANTED. Listen up, folks.

  • Joe

    We can no longer be the police department to the world. Ron Paul is the only candidate that acknowledges it.
    America has BIG issuies here at home. Let us fix our own home, instead of repairing everyone elses problems.
    You wouldnt put your own personal finances in jeopardy, or fix someone elses roof, if yours was leaking?!
    Let us secure our own homes against the elements, be certain your own family is safe, then reach out to your neighbers around the world to lend a hand.
    The United States Government is large enough.
    Who pays their salaries?
    We do, the American taxpayer.
    Lets do some corporate downsizing.
    Which candidate expresses this?
    I think Mr Paul is the only logical chice we have.

  • Art Miami

    If you should happen to support the U.S. Constitution , then support of Ron Paul should be a no brainer.
    If however you are a “no-brainer”, then go ahead and vote for Newt or Mitt, or Perry, or any of the other R.I.N.O.’s. But don’t expect any change at all.
    Might as well re-elect Obomma , as the agenda will remain the same.
    Ron Paul is the last best hope for America.
    Google ” War is a Racket”, by General Smedley Butler. free pdf It’s not a big long read , and you may learn something that helps you make a good choice in the 2012 elections

  • pookie

    RON PAUL’S IDEALOGY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS IS PRETTY SCARY AND DEGRADING…. YOU REALLY DON’T WANT TO PISS OFF EVERY COUNTRY BEYOND THE USA. AND I AGREE WITH THE VETERAN – NO ONE IS TRULY SAFE IN THE USA, NOT WHEN OUR BORDERS ARE NOT PROTECTED. DID YOU KNOW – THAT ITS NOT ONLY ILLEGAL MEXICANS COMING ACROSS, WE HAVE IRANIANS, PAKISTANS, CUBANS, ASIANS, YOU NAME IT – ITS CROSSING OUR BORDERS, AND I FOUND OUT FROM A RETIRED BORDER PATROL AGENT, THAT WE HAVE “TERRORIST” CELLS ALONG OUR BORDER IN ARIZONA.

    • Thad Skantowski

      Our policies for the last 40 year to present have been pissing off the rest of the world. We are broken as a country, now is the time to fix it and be the model we once were. Obumbler has done more to reck our status as a world figure than Bush and Clinton combined. Bring the troops to protect our borders, spend the saved money of not being in proxy wars on our military tech. Deal with the battles decisively and with Congressional approval under the rules of the Constitution.

      • Rae Durr

        I agree with you Thad. People around the world do hate us for our policies for the past 40 yrs.

        Has no one ever heard the expression “war is a racket” ?? There are those who want to keep us in a perpetual state of war because there is a lot of money to be made from wars. And a lot of wars are started based on a lot of lies— take, for example, the Iraq war— and that’s just for starters.

    • Tammy

      Our policies is what HAS pissed off the world. Anyone who thinks the road we are on with rhinos or democrats is AMERICAN….is the LOON. We are just as bad as the loons in communist countries who FORSAKE ALL FRUIT for the elite to have every privilege and citizen to have none. YOU PEOPLE ARE CRAZY if you think we’ve done any good in the world. Since the 70s we’ve RUINED THE WORLD…while also transferring the wealth of the middle class TO AN ELITE INTERNATIONAL EVIL CROWD. But stupid people will persist in their delusions! https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001432299502&ref=tn_tnmn

  • http://? Virginia Allain

    I believe the sleeper candidate will take Iowa…….. RICK SANTORUM IS THE BEST MAN FOR PRESIDENT. HE IS HONEST, AND A MAN OF FAITH AND CHARACTER. HE UNDERSTANDS THE PROBLEMS FACING OUR NATION AND IS READY TO BEGIN SOLVING THEM…… After the Great Depression we had two presidents who we neither full of personality or charm but they got our nation back on its feet. It you choose a person by their physical attributes you will do our nation a disservice again. That is what got obama in office. He was charismatic and said everything some people wanted to hear. But once in office has accomplished none of his promises. CHOOSE A PERSON WHO WILL NOT TURN HIS BACK ON US ONCE IN OFFICE, CHOOSE RICK SANTORUM…. HE MAY NOT BE FIERY LIKE NEWT, OR EVEN AS HANDSOME AS ROMNEY, BUT IS THAT WHAT MATTERS.????????? GOD BLESS AMERICA , MERRY CHRISTMAS!

    • capnbrit

      Agreed!!!
      Everyone needs to step back, sit down, take a deep breath, turn off the TV and start thinking for themselves. Look at the records, Rick is the wisest choice.

      • paulsupporter onceagain

        people need to read a few books to open their eyes. This is instead of watching mindless t.v. with MSM swinging their opinions.

        We cannot have a prosperous country by increasing our debts. We cannot occupy 130 nations unless there are huge tax increases.

  • Bird

    I believe the question is this. Who is this field is a true Constitutionalist? Once you have answered that question, you have found your candidate. I recommend you go out to each of the candidates websites, read their platforms and decide whose platform most closely resembles our Constitution. It is far to easy to let feelings get in the way, so put on your legal hats, keep score and pick your candidate.

  • Eric

    Ron Paul has the Constitution down pat. He may be wobbly on foreign affairs, but I think he can be trained by “experts” so we will be safe. Can he win? Maybe, but I (unfortunately) think we need a younger person. I wish we had a younger Ron Paul. He has been right about the deficit, the FED, government growth,etc., for decades.Voters jut did’t listen. Now, we all have to put up with our failure as voters and try to work out of this mess. Government doesn’t need to do anything, it just needs to do a whole lot less. Everyone, read the Constitution, understand it, read some of the Federalist papers (or get The Federalist Papers for Dummies, written in modern English). We all have an obligation to get things right or we all face the consequences for our failures. Talk to our friends, neighbors, even strangers. Don’t argue, use facts. We don’t have a lot of time. Oh, and by the way, ANYONE on the list of nominees is 1000% better than Obama.

    • charles

      Eroc

      Was Reagan too old for you too??

  • dallas wolff

    Ron Paul has my vote. He is pledged to cut government to the bone, trillion dollars a year for three years, and is the only candidate that will put oue foreighn policy in line with our constitution. Our country is broke now is the time to bite the bullet and make the cuts, not 10 years down the road. Its a must to seal our borders and shores now. We must rid our senate and house of all socalled progressive democrats along with some repubs like John McCain who continuously rants about national security. I ask him what country would attack us?? They all know we have the ability to destroy any country in the world from within our borders. We dont need 150 bases all over the world. Example of our failures is Korea. I served in Korean war 50 plus years ago. We still have thousands of men there for what???
    We are losing our constitutional rights, Patriot act was a start. Congress is at it again passing a so called unconstitutional law which subjects all of us to military law. You know Obama wants that authority to induce military law so we wont have an election in 2012. Citzens look out.

    • Tammy

      yay Dallas….YAY. We could make middle class Americans millionaires by the 100s of THOUSANDS EACH and every year….just by handing them the money rather than the private contracts of elite evil people getting all the HEIST…..but we wouldn’t agree with that….so WHY DO WE PERSIST in the spending that has literally ruined the world and broken a once wealthy middle class? BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE IT IF ITS ON TELEVISION!!!! https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001432299502&ref=tn_tnmn

  • H. S. Folger

    Ssantorum, Huntsman, and Bachman will be gone after Iowa. The rest will dilute to Gingrich, Romney, and Paul. And the winner is…………………………. who knows. But, as has been said in the debates, any of them is better than the black Irishman, O’Bama.

  • paulsupporter onceagain

    Paul is the best person right now.

    We cannot afford any more wars. Its not possible unless ALL of the war hawks willingly decide to reduce their standards of living to pay 70 percent more in federal income taxes. That is to level fund the current spending levels. We spend 3.6 trillion and take in2.0 trillion. How many of you in the anti Paul crowd would be willing to send in that extra money starting for this year? None I bet.

    We are in 130 countries and operate 800 bases worldwide. If we continue this military buildup we will need a return of the draft *for both sexes*. Is everyone ready for that? Should we be spending money to build up dictators and then fund their enemies. Next they turn on us as we are sending troops and money there? We protect other borders and ours are open.? And we borrow money to fund it all? The children of today will pay for it tomorrow though higher taxes with their money sent to other countries like China and Japan. Its child abuse as they have no say in it.

    Other than Paul – who has any plans to reduce spending immediately. This bull about reducing *additional spending increases* of 1.2 trillion over the next 10 years is another fallacy. We will overspend 1.5 trillion per year. Ten years of that is 15 trillion. Minus the 1.2 trillion is still overspending 13.8 trillion. And those numbers are always higher.

    We have a serious overspending problem. Look at the first and bottom line here http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Is everyone ready to send in the amount that they personally owe? I bet now…

    Which pol commented on the vote taken 2 weeks ago that would allow people to be picked up, jailed, and no right to a trial by jury so held indefinitely? Only Ron Paul mentioned it. There is this thing called the fourth amendment in the constitution.

    A lot of the rank in file Rep voters have not read that the federal reserve is a private bank. It has private owners – many of whom are not from this country. Audit it. Let the public see where the funds are actually going. And let the public see how future workers will be debt slaves for the funds being spent overseas. Only Paul is mentioning that.

    If you want RINO or another liberal its almost guaranteed the overspending will create high inflation AND much higher taxes for those lucky enough to have jobs. We need serious changes that ONLY Dr. Paul is speaking about.

    The young voters are enthused for Paul. They have come to realize that soc sec will not be there for them. He has an great offering to them.

    I see this is the conservative byte. Who has the most conservative voting record? Ans is definitely Ron Paul. Open your eyes.

  • Jay

    It just ANOTHER poll taken amomgst a handfull of people that means absolutly nothing. If I had a dollar for all the “polls” that have been taken I’d be on a tropical island. Polls mean nothing at this stage.

  • Capt. Link Hogthrob

    Ron Paul is an egotistical old fool who reminds me of Pat Paulson. And if he is emboldened by any sort of primary success, he will run in the general as an independent. Thus ensuring 4 more years of the chimp in chief and the doom of America as we know it. Can you imagine the pathological narcissist in chief if he never has to face the American voter again? You think he has been arrogant and irresponsible now…you ain’t seen nothing of this deranged marxist’s contempt of America yet!

    • 1949

      EXCEPT FOR COLOR HE AN OBAMA COULD BE BROTHERS

  • Phil Dunton

    Dr. Paul is the only candidate who has the guts to make the hard financial decisions needed in D.C. If Romney or Gingrich are elected, at the end of the day, we will have bigger, more intrusive government, and a larger debt.
    The issue of Ron Paul’s foreign policy will be moot if our economy to collapses!
    I’ll vote to take a dose of Dr. Paul’s financial and Libertarian medicine hoping that the realities of being in office will moderate his foreign policies.

  • Dave

    Well then, let’s vote for the One World Government advocate Newt Gingrich.

    We’ll see how you like his foreign policy!

    • Thad Skantowski

      He’s a New World Bildebergh

  • Mike

    Apparently, Iowans brains may be frozen if they are favoring Paul over anyone else. After his performance in the last debate, he should be running last in the polls.

    • 1949

      he is a nut case. i don’t know how he got elected in the first place

  • Dick Benson

    Ron Paul could be the biggest boost Obama can get. What is with the republican party- they can’t find a winner- by default we will end up with Romney and without a united party we will have four more years of Obama and his socialism- unchecked for four years imagine how much different we will be. Wake up republicans we need to unite and be strong.

  • Dan

    I’m for Newt 2012 !!! Paul is the very bottom to my thinking.. Like you say “You can’t fix stupid”!!!

    • Mark in LA

      Yes, you are permanently broken and beyond repair.

    • Laura Hall

      A true patriot would make a stand now to preserve our liberty. Anything less is treason. The RINOs who oppose Obama will make no significant policy changes. The only one who offers a way out of our current distress and REAL solutions is Dr. Paul. I love all the losers on here who can’t even spell and know nothing about the candidates except what the MSM has fed them. We must not allow the neocons to decide our candidate, but, if they do, I will not support them and neither will any other patriot. I will vote according to my conscience and my convictions this year, and I will vote for Ron Paul only.

  • Eric

    Dallas, You’re right about Ron and our country. But, so is everyone else posting today. We have gotten so far from our Constitution that it seems everyone is lost in the wilderness. How many people do you know that understand the Constitution, or even acknowledge it? It is our job to get things right, demand smaller government from our “leaders” and work HARD to get government to downsize. This will take a long time because of what has been allowed to fester in our government. But, if we keep at it, we can get this right. Freedom isn’t free and it is time everyone learns it and acts it. Educate yourselves and then act.

  • PISSED OFF PATRIOT

    I hope Paul doesn’t try a third party run, lets see how patriotic Paul really is. Our goal should be to get Obama out of the White House, any third party candidate would help Obama, I’d vote for Bozo the Clown to unseat Obama, anyone.

    • 1949

      AMEN TO THAT. GET RID OF OBAMA FIRST THEN WE WILL DEAL WITH THE NEXT PRESIDENT.

      • mickey2

        Just like we have over the last 60 yrs?????

  • VanZorge

    paul is nothing more than a flash in the pan. his peeps have been organizing in iowa for the past 4 years. they hope to get some momentum going out of iowa.

    code pink and iraq veterans against war (modern morphing of john kerry’s vietnam veterans against war) are big-time paul supporters……….

    • Laura Hall

      You are too ignorant for words. Ron Paul has consistently carried the same message for 35+ years! That’s a long flash.
      “It is better to be silent and have people think you are stupid, than to speak and remove all doubt.”

  • Supertad108

    Amazes me that individuals can keep regurgitate the same arguments. Personally haven’t made a decision but at a minimum doing my OWN actual research. Have you folks actually read Dr Paul’s stances or you’re still listening to sound bites. If ANY of these current candidates would actually stand and state the real problems then they may get my consideration. At a minimum the federal reserve needs auditing and the military “worldwide” peacekeepers MUST stop. I don’t have a problem with our military in strategic places throughout, however those countries should foot the bill. Tax payer nation building has to stop. So, as it stands YES Paul makes the most sense for America.

  • dufus

    Are we going to let the media decide our next President again? If the GOP supporters
    can’t see who is the most intelligent, and strongest candidate to beat Obama they
    deserve to lose again and suffer extremely horrible consequences for this country.
    Newt will out debate the residing Muslim any day and has more experience than any
    of the other candidates. If you are looking for the perfect one he is in heaven!

    • mickey2

      Unless Pelosi spills the beans.

  • Laura Hall

    This site should be called NEO-Con Byte. They consistently try to drum up support for the RINO’s and are completely committed to undermining Ron Paul. As far as I’m concerned, the staff of this newsletter are a bunch of statists and traitors.

    • mickey2

      I’m beginning to agree with you, we have bombers on the right, bombers on the left, the heck with the Constitution, the Bill of rights, only Ron Paul is standing in the middle with the Constitution.

  • JAB

    We need to ignore the polls. I bet most of those in the Iowa poll were Obama supporters. The media loves to knock down anyone who might be a threat to Obuma. They felt Palin was a threat on 08 and they never let up on her. When Newt’s ratings go up you can guarantee to see them decline shortly after. I believe he is Obummer’s biggest threat. If you feel Newt is the way to go, don’t let the polls sway you.

  • Floorguy

    There is a very big difference in defense & offense.

    Defense spending, is not military spending.

    Let me come camp out in your living room and tell you, you must ask my permission to run your household. I’ll give you some cash, though.

    We are like the roommate from hell, that moved in without asking.

  • Steve

    Obama’s backers are afraid of Gingrich and know he would walk all over Obama in a debate. Therefore they are trying to defeat Gingrich, with getting Paul in, before any debate that could wipe Obama out. Wake up voters, the Obama backers will do anything to get him back in. Acorn, black panthers, Chicago mob, and the rest that enjoy stealing and robbing to get what they want.

    • derek

      Right you are!

    • Mark in LA

      Another idiot. This stupid meme that “Gingrich will out-debate Obama” is meaningless because 2/3 f the voters won’t watch anyway and the Obama voter won’t care. The only thing you do is convince the 40% of the populace that were already going to vote for Gingrich that they picked the right guy.

  • Cameron

    Paul cant beat Obama? Who is winning the polls head to head agaist Obama? Where is the money coming from to police the world? WE ARE BANKRUPT!! Nobody is stopping all you warmongerers from sending your whole paycheck to the pentagon. I havent heard any of the other candidates talk about cutting the federal govt to a reasonable size.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      what we are seeing is a recession that could slide to a depression if we do not spending as much money.

      NOT one of the people who support more wars and more troops are willing to really increase their taxes voluntarily to support it all.

      American currency has collapsed several times before. If it happens again that will be the end of the military and the end of social services spending. The public has to open its eyes to the spending. NO other candidate is speaking of reducing spending. Paul is the best choice to save the Republic.

      • mickey2

        We are in a depression, the soup lines are food stamps, only difference.

  • votervic

    Wow! An amazing amount of comments on this article. And, I agree with most….Ron Paul is a nut case! Hopefully, Iowa will reject him, cause IF we think the national media has ripped apart the likes of Herman Cain and others, just wait till he gets the nomination. Remember when the media was afraid of Ronaldus Manus saying, he was so old that he’d likely ‘push the nuclear war botton in an old age panic’? I do! They will pull out all the stops against Paul! I am still will Bachman!

    • Backgammon

      Well, Frankly, Regan did have dementia in his last years as President.

  • whoopingcough

    It’s still all Bushes fault!

  • http://Yahoo Lee Wood

    http://politicalvelcraft.org/federal-reserve-1/
    A long but MUST read…..seriously

    • mickey2

      Yes, a must read.

      We have the internet, lol, obama hailed it 3 yrs ago and now wants a kill switch, read, read, and read some more. We may not have this for much longer.

  • http://Yahoo Lee Wood

    A must read

  • Bob

    After a candidate is nominated we better all put down the cool aid and vote for whoever that turns out to be.All these polls don’t mean much until then.Most people are still forming their opinions and trying to decide.That is why these polls keep swinging so much.If we are still not as one next November then we are lost and Obama will win again.If that happens the America that we all love is gone.The transformation to dictatorship will come quickly and we will not be able to stop it.Obama’s supporters are mostly those that want handouts and believe the government owes them

  • theBigLogic

    I don’t like Santorums toupee.

  • JDH

    Ron Paul has even less chance of winning the presidency than Barry Goldwater did, and probably will be lucky to receive as many electoral votes as Barry did. With what is percieve of his fiscal policies, the 43% to 53% of the population who pay no taxes and live off the government will be motivated will be motivated by the progressives get out and vote against him. His foreign policy scares a lot of people too. He may very well be right on most issues, but the voting public, as they did with Goldwater, will consider him nuts. Are best bets are Ginrich, Romney, Bachmann, and Santorum and hope that whichever one gets the nomination is really a conservative in a moderate’s clothing.

    • mickey2

      There are a lot of blue/republicans, changing registration for 1 year.

      There are a lot of so-called minorities groups that see the benefit of being “individuals vs group”.

      And if the Constitution is nuts, so am I.

  • Lookin for REAL conservative

    Sara Palin Where Are YOU?

  • Lee Z

    Paul is the only candidate that sees through the smokescreen. We need radical change to get back to Jeffersonian – Constitutional ethics. That means look at things like the IRS and Fed as illegal private entities….which they are….and close them for a better system….money backed by metals, and do not tax our labors…which is unconstitutional. Paul knows this. None of the others pay attention, even if they do know it.

  • derek

    The biggest threat (besides a Paul nomination) is one of these fools jumping in as a 3rd party candidate. Bloomberg, Trump, Paul etc… if they jump in…. it’s a sure victory for Oblahblah. See: 1992.

  • Les

    Here we go again, Hello McCain. With all the Rino’s against Newt they are destroying the only hope we have. Well I would take the Texan.

    • Mark in LA

      Newt has no chance. The Paul Republicans won’t vote for him and the Paul Democrats will vote for Obama.

  • jp

    Ok everyone I agree with a lot of what I have read but I would like to add. We vote in Newt. and America honor Mrs. Gingrich the honor of becoming first lady via adultery. Mitt is just another rich man looking out for the rich and Paul just nuts he would cause American to witness for the 1st time in their live war on taking place on American land. I see why Republicans are confused on just who might be the person to vote for.

    • mickey2

      umm I agree until Paul. I would say the sleeper cells will activate if we go into Iran, Bachmann’s choice.

      Republicans voted for NDAA.

  • Bob Marshall

    You can’t fix stupid but you can fix ignorance. That is why America is in the shape it is today. Because of million of ignorant people US Imperialism will continue. google Land destroyer/Which Way To Persia Read pages 85 and 85. Millions who supported the Gulf and illegal Iraq War as well as the bombing of Kuwait helped to make these plans possible. ” If we are to be free and ignorant in a state of civilization, we expect what never was and never will be… if we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every citizen to be informed. Thomas Jefferson. I believe it is too late for America. too many have believed the lies put out by the corporate controlled news media for over forty years. much of it censored by the White House. The only hope of America is for God to give America either his blessings or his wrath. We don’t deserve his blessing and his wrath would cleanse the nation and give us a fresh start in obedience to his will.

  • Vern

    Anyone who would vote for either party is a moron. Their all elitist career politicians, liars and thieves. Their the reason America is circling the drain, them and all you morons who still believe in either party.

  • Christine

    Ron Paul is honest, decent man, one we can be proud of for a change, who loves this country, and loves freedom, and the constitution. If the establishment people keep getting in, we will all kiss our freedoms goodbye. RP will protect our freedoms in this country. I for one, do not want government spying on our every move with cameras and listening devices, taking away guns, and property rights, and freedom of speech, freedom of the press, searching and groping old ladies in wheelchairs at the airport, reading our emails, throwing us in prison without charges and a trial, buying out their banker cronies with hard earned tax money. Plus we are bankrupt, what the hell are we doing all over the world policing it? Isn’t it time we protect our Constitution, before we lose the rights our forefathers fought so hard to give us?

  • http://www.whenthefatmanspeaks.com gary jones

    New’t Gingrich, the Democrat s fear because they want anyone but him to face Obama and his teleprompters, I would vote for a goat before voting for the frig gin traitor Obama.

  • Backgammon

    Ron Paul is almost 80 years old! That really hurt McCain. Aside from his age, Ron Paul can not beat Obama. I’m sticking to Newt with the baggage. He is the only one who has actually done all the things every one else talks about.

  • Duane Grindstaff

    Sadly Morons can’t see that Ron Paul is the only hope for the future, and the only one, who has a chance against Obama. We shall see how serious the Republican Party really is about getting rid of Obama by whether or not Paul is nomonated, or just another same-o same-o candidate that got us into the mess we are in, in the first place! Of course Paul isn’t too popular among nonthinkers because he would dismantle the military-industrial complex the Eisenhower warned us about and return us to the Constitutional Law that once made this country great. All the others are just puppets of the military-industrialists and the bankers, that have lowered our standing in the world.

  • DK

    Anybody thinking Ron Paul would be a disaster on this forum is probably a paid psyop operative trying to instill fear among others.

    The vast majority of our troops support Ron Paul. If anything tragic would happen under a Paul presidential administration, the people would be outraged enough to the effect we would actualky declare war, wherein, we’d take care of business and be done with it.

    • WhoKnows

      YEAH, it is an anti-Ron conspiracy! Sure. The only paid psychological warfare operatives I know are in the RiP camp. Your reverse psychology doesn’t work any better than the straight stuff boy. I would need to know Paul’s running mate before even considering casting a vote for him. We have an office pool for how many days the man will breathe on his own after the swearing in (regardless of if he wins) and a separate pool for when dementia is reported by media (not that it isn’t already noticeable to those of us who have family with Alzheimers). Regardless of past service and current policy, his days are numbered, and I’m betting under four digits to win.

  • keith

    Alleged conservatives, Paul, Bachmann and Santorum are the only three in this race worth voting for. If you think big government globalism, as defined by Romney, Gingrich and Huntsman is conservatism, you are just as well to start backing Obama. The only difference between Obama, Romney, Gingrich and Huntsman is the letter after their names and the use of different types of window dressing to make that globalist window look more appealing to the masses. I once thought the same as many of you do. But, Paul has a very good point on bringing the troops home. Actually, he has several. First, we have already demonstrated we can launch aircraft from the US and strike anywhere in the world within hours. By closing all overseas bases and returning home, we would save billions of dollars each year in base leases and other costs. We would have the full force of our military available to protect our own borders. And, last but not least, we would take away what many agree is the primary tool for recruiting Islamic terrorists, infidels in the holy land. Yeah, I once thought his foreign policy stance was out there. But, his stance of not meddling in other countries affairs is exactly right. An example right now would be countries in Africa. Many are up in arms at the US now because the Obama admin made a condition of further aide the promotion of homosexuality in those countries. Since many of those countries are now under Islam, you can imagine where that went. Ron Paul would halt all foreign aide, saving billions more dollars every year.

  • TONY SALAZAR

    If Paul is the way Iowa thinks, politically, then is it time to rethink the primaries and eliminate such idiocity? Why should only a few States decide for whom and why the country must vote?

    • WhoKnows

      AMEN!

    • mickey2

      I wondered about this myself. Then, if I am not mistaken, each precinct–real people–get to vote who they support. Those reps go forward to the national. Seemed like a long drawn out process to me until I found out these are real people casting a vote, not a machinery, primary takes all.

  • Gene

    Let’s think about this….Hmmmmm. North Korea’s dictator dies leaving his son in charge. Immediately N. Korea test fires missiles. Do you think Ron Paul would have the balls to defend this nation?

    • Mark in LA

      I realize that you are an idiot just by making that comment but what does Korea firing a missle have to do with defending our country?

    • blindenoughtosee

      Gene he is like the others goes under ground tells the military go get them ,He should have the same right as others .Which president do you know who went to war on the front lines other than George one of the founders .It does not take balls to send someone else to fight a battle and die. It takes some one to keep you out of those wars so they can live like the rest do?If you are brave enough to start a war you should be brave enough to die in it .And as RON PAUL said if you go to war go to win and come home in about 30 minutes.Your government started the war let them fight for the country they say they love and want to protect.Not one with the exception of RON PAUL would and he did.HE DID NOT RUN AWAY BUT HELPED THE WOUNDED.

  • deanwolf

    Ron Paul !!!!!! the rest is agenda clones working for the bank !!!!! Or do you want more of the same fear based fake wars we brainwash yourself with… Support your troops and bring em home !!!! F**k the middle east and the oil barrons…. we can use our own and create jobs!!!!!

  • Leon Berton

    For all those attacking Ron Paul, would you FIRST READ HIS POSITIONS ON HIS WEBSITE?

    Then, go READ THE CONSTITUTION.

  • Terry Evans

    I can not believe these ridiculous comments. Ron Paul is the only one running that both understands what is going wrong in America and can stand tow to tow with Obumer.
    I must assume by the stupid remarks that Dems are writing these post and are terrified.
    Come on, a Rhino. His record puts him as the most conservative candidate. He has predicted
    all the trouble we are in and has fought to stop it. The only one. His policy for fixing America at home is what is needed in our bankrupt state we are in, and his foreign policy has more truth in it then you are hearing. He is not an isolationist, he just wants to do things by the book – the Constitution. He will be limited in anything he can achieve in office as he will face stiff resistance at every effort to repair our country, and he will not force things through illegally as the crook in office currently does. RON PAUL is our solution. All the YouTube videos posted show his true stand. He says straight out his true belief; He is honest. He will not be getting blow jobs in office or cheating on America for a few bucks. Get Real and back the true American. A little research on the others and watching their performances in the debates should prove in a moment that they are dishonest, inconsistent, and can not debate for crap. They say what was rehears while RON PAUL talks from knowledge and his heart. HE IS THE MAN.

  • Snow

    I havent decided yet who to vote for prez but it sure wont be Obummer_But I think Ron Paul would be best served as Head of the fed reserve_can you imagine the digging that man will do to find out where all our money went.Ok all you RP supporters Ron Paul cant and wont win the prez nomination_This country is more centrist_not staunch conservative or liberal democrat_While i agree with Pauls conservatism his foreign policy scares most Americans..Just sayin.

    • paulsupporter onceagain

      the way the fed reserve is set up:

      the fed res presents its hand picked nominees to the president to select from.

      the deck is stacked.

      Sadly 98 percent of Americans have no clue about the fed reserve. They create booms and busts.

      There are many books IF people would read them.

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    It seems to me, from the comments most have made, that you tend to pin your hopes on the man, whoever that may be, rather than on the office he holds.

    If we were to hold the man to his office and the oath that he takes to uphold our Constitution, it really wouldn’t matter who that person is. We, the people are responsible for holding accountable, the actions of our elected representatives, that’s the way our system is designed.

    Unless we know our Constitution and take the same oath, we have no legitimate complaint.

    The uninformed elected a ‘pig in a poke’ with BHO and we’re all paying for it.

    Based on his record, Ron Paul is the most reponsible individual. You may not agree with his opinions, but we’re not appointing a Dictator, are we? And if you think he’s radical, what the
    heck is ObamaCare?

    I believe that Ron Paul can lead this Country back to some state of sanity. It’s seldom easy to do the right thing. If you’re looking for a magic wand to fix the mess we’ve gotten our selves into, your living in a fantasy.

    We, the people, in effect, have to re-elect a Scott Walker, in principle and character, over and over again. The ‘takers’ that prey on the fruit of our honest labor are always lurking nearby, looking for any opportunity to take whatever they can without contributing much if anything.

    Freedom isn’t free, the price of Liberty is eternal vigilance. Let’s get ‘er done! Let’s roll!

  • Dave

    BEWARE of how Iowa votes. You know haw they voted last time, OBUMMER !! HALF WITS!

  • Bob M

    A message to Rubin,
    I’m a 72 yr. old senior. I resent your inference that I would vote for that crazy old Coot!!

  • tod

    Dr.Ron Paul 2012 for the ONLY PROVEN HONEST(for Well Over 30 Years),Intelligent,God Fearing,Patriot running for President,PERIOD !!!

  • PeachFuzzCMH

    We are less than a year away from the presidential election, and even the old guard in the Republican party has to be getting a wee bit nervous. For the first time in a very long time, there is a chance that the old guard “pick” will not be the party nominee. I don’t under-estimate the old guard money and clout – but we are not making it easy on them. I just wish we were all ready to swallow the big pill and get rid of every politician in Washington and bring in some movers and shakers who will ‘get in’ and then ‘get out’ after doing what is right for every freedom loving American.

    • Herb

      I do not believe anything in Washington will change no matter who wins until we put term limits on all the politicians. Two terms, no lifetime benies, Health care at the VA hospitals and clinics, do your terms and go home and go back to work.

  • http://www.dlopezforcongress.com Delia

    Ron Paul is not soft on American security that is why he receives more in donations from active military members than all of the other candidates combined. After 9/11 his suggestion to bomb all the terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and treat the terrorists as pirates the same way Thomas Jefferson did. The laws that allowed Captain Jack Pershing to end terrorist attacks on Americans for 42 years. He wants to secure our borders and ports of entry to protect Americans in this nation. If you want to travel to Iran and hang out, go for it. Just don’t expect me to risk my son or spend my money to save your dumb ass! Bush Jr said we need to cut spending and stop policing the world! I loved him. We are spending a trillion dollars protecting all these other nations. We take money from poor Americans and send it to despots as foreign aid. We reward criminals with citizenship, welfare, food stamps and free housing. Ron Paul is the only one that would actually work to cut the size, scope and power of government. Restore our Constitution and reduce taxes. Ignore what the media says they are liars, look at what he says. Not what they say he said. Imagine eliminating entire federal departments. Ronald Reagan brought our troops home from the middle east saying we could never understand the irrationality of those people. We don’t need to lets take care of our nation and our people. America first!

    • http://conservativebyte Robert

      Atleast you have proven to me, that some people are intelligent enough to know what’s important. Thank you!

    • AlleyOops

      What you’re actually saying without saying it is that your love of this country is conditional…The fact that you wouldn’t send you son off to protect America says a lot about you and Ron Paul….Ron Paul has a very naive, sophomore approach to foreign policy…the world is too small for America to ever stick their head in the sand again…It matters not what Paul’s fiscal policy is….if we don’t have a safe and secure America in which to provide goods and services, fiscal policy wont matter.

      • Pepper

        Delia said no such thing. “If you want to travel to Iran and hang out, go for it. Just don’t expect me to risk my son or spend my money to save your dumb ass!” has nothing to do with protecting America.

        • AlleyOops

          “Just don’t expect me to risk my son or spend my money to save your dumb ass!” That says it very loud and clear that if her son is called to duty, she wont spare him to protect America…Off to Canada like many did during the Viet Nam conflict…

          • Bonnie

            AlleyOops,
            Google Major General Smedley Butler, ret. book “War is a Racket”. It has a different perpective on wars. It can be read online. Hope you’ll read it!

  • charleydan

    If one who understands the constitution, will understand Ron Paul. Most of America has no clue to the constitution and very limited government.

    The very reason, politics will not save America and the very reason Americans better have a back up plan to this repressive government to freedom it has left long ago. Yes, there are other countries freer then USA, we slipped many years ago from the number one spot.

    Such a sad story, us Americans have woken from a hundred sleep, to late. With most thinking that a majority vote=mob rule—will save the day. LOLROF

  • charleydan

    If one who understands the constitution, will understand Ron Paul. Most of America has no clue to the constitution and very limited government.

    The very reason, politics will not save America and the very reason Americans better have a back up plan to this repressive government to freedom it has left long ago. Yes, there are other countries freer then USA, we slipped many years ago from the number one spot.

    Such a sad story, us Americans have woken from a hundred sleep, to late. With most thinking that a majority vote=mob rule—will save the day.

  • Mark in LA

    I guess the surgery the lizard man had to sew the two forks of his tongue together wasn’t as sucessful as he thought.

  • eric

    Sounds like a lot of Americans have a case of the pussies, we have tried every end of the spectrum except for Ron Pauls, we are all going to die by our own hands anyway, Ron Pauls views are different than anyone else ever had so I will vote for him you never know

  • Pepper

    “Ron Paul is right except his nutty foreign policy will kill us all!”

    “His foreign policy is worse than Obama’s!”

    “Iran! Nukes! Iran!!!!1111!!”

    You people need to calm down, take your meds, and watch this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo
    Then come back here and tell me Ron Paul isn’t right on this too.

  • Adam Gonzalez

    All you for not allowing Iran to have nuculear capability need a nuke up your ass and have the Zionist Israel eat the remains.

  • I L JUREY

    Most commentators are missing the main points here. 1) The main battle here is defeating Obama. So, which one has the ability to do this? If you follow the polls, Gingrich & Romney are leading. Either one (both are experienced in politics.) will be able to beat Obama if Americans do not split the vote! So far, Newt is leading in the polls so that’s where I’ll cast my vote so far unless he commits some really whacko act! 2) All have negative points and there is not one running who has ALL positive ideology including Paul! 3) America cannot isolate itself from the world due to trade & its deficits if we are to get back on our feet with a new POTUS leading us there economically! 4) America cannot isolate itself from the threat of nuclear proliferation in the world, especially with Muslim nations gaining access constantly & their terrorists having access to nuclear bombs. 5) Americans must keep in mind which candidate is using the most wisdom in dealing with these two threats: Nuclear & Muslim terrorists! 5) Americans must keep in mind that ALL these candidates have dabbled in the economy either via the Federal, Congressional, or other Governmental fronts. 6) Which candidate has influenced the Fed Gov the most to balance the budget???? In case you don’t know, it’s Gingrich … check out political history!

    • mickey2

      Israel, India, Pakistan have nukes. Much less Russia, North Korea, China, yet the only one to use them is the US. So who do you fear most, Iran, surrounded by countries that already have nukes, or the US which used them?

    • Bonnie

      The problem with Newt and Romney is that it will be just more of Obama’s policies. When will America wake up and realize that doing the same thing over and over and over, again only to arrive with the same results, is insanity. We need someone who is 380° different. That “someone” is Ron Paul!

    • Bonnie

      It’s obvious most people on this forum do not read every post. I’ve posted Gingrich’s record on this very thread and if you had read it, you would have known he is a progressive socialist. If you don’t know what that means, you need to use your computer for searching out the facts. In the meantime, show how dedicated you are to REALLY finding the candidate who will save this country from tyranny by reading everything that’s posted on here whether it tickles your ears or not. This is the problem with most people on these forums. They’ve allowed the media to make up their minds who they will vote for without even bothering to check their records. I’ll excuse your lack somewhat. Several years ago our enemy decided to infiltrate our school systems to dumb down America’s youth. Lucky for me, my generation was taught well. We learned how to think for ourselves and be responsible for our actions, unlike most of the present generation.

  • http://www.americanchristiansociety.vpweb.com ChristianAmerican

    The future of a America is Conservative. Who is the reliable Conservative?
    Ronald Reagan was a Conservative icon the changed the direction of the country. He was not able to abolish the “old regime” the changes the Progressives inflicted. What Reagan did was create prosperity that saved the “old regime” from collapsing.
    Progressives created this mess.
    Conservatives can get us out. Government is necessary, but it must be limited. Smaller government is not the issue, limited government is.
    Ron Paul is a Libertarian, not a Republican. Newt is a Republican, a Reagan Republican, a Conservative Republican that was part of the Reagan Revolution and Conservative movement. Did I say he was perfect…absolutely not. I loved Reagan and I miss him, but he wasn’t Jesus Christ either.
    The reliable, dedicated Conservative Republicans are Newt, Perry, and Santorum. A ticket combination of any of these would make the grade to limit government.
    To get back to the days of old, the days of blue skies and rainbows, the American Way, truth and justice, is a hard sell, but it’s possible.
    Our candidates need to be head strong because they face strong head winds. Newt and Perry have been tried & tested. They are reliable against the winds of the Big Bad Wolf / Progressives.
    Palin would be the best, but oh well. We need Newt and/or Perry. Just sayin’

    • mickey2

      Newt is a progressive, he doesn’t deny it. Perry joined the Bilderberg group, hardly a plus, mandantory vaccines, an illegal mess?

      • Bonnie

        Oh, my goodness, ChristianAmerican!! I hope you will look at Newt’s record. I posted it yesterday or the day before, but you may have missed it. Hopefully, you won’t miss it today.

        Newt Gingrich
        For those who are seriously thinking of voting for Newt, you should really look hard at his previous actions. Here are just some to start:

        04/02/1987 – He co-sponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine (anti 1st Amendment legislation).
        10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
        11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
        11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
        01/06/1996 – He himself conceived a secret CIA mission to topple the Iranian leadership.
        04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion).
        06/–/1995 – He wrote the foreword to a book about tearing down the U.S. Constitution and implementing a Fascist World Government.
        06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
        09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
        01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
        11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
        11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to.
        04/04/2007 – He says that there should be a clear distinction about what weapons should be reserved for only for the military.
        04/17/2008 – Made a commercial with Nancy Pelosi on Climate Change.
        09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
        10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
        12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
        03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
        07/30/2010 – Says that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
        08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
        11/15/2010 – He defended Romney-care; blamed liberals.
        12/02/2010 – He advocates a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens.
        12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
        01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
        01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
        02/10/2011 – He wants to replace the EPA instead of abolishing it.
        02/02/2011 – He says we are “losing the War on Terror”; the conflict will be as long as the Cold War.
        02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
        03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
        03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
        03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability).
        03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
        03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
        04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
        05/11/2011 – His campaign video said that he wants to “find solutions together, and insist on imposing those solutions on those who do not want to change.”
        05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
        05/15/2011 – Said GOP’s plan to cut back Medicare was “too big a jump.”
        05/15/2011 – He backed Obama’s individual mandate; “All of us have a responsibility to help pay for health care.”
        05/16/2011 – He also endorsed individual mandates in 1993 when Clinton pushed Universal Health Care.
        05/17/2011 – He has an outstanding debt to Tiffany’s Jewelry of between $250K – $500K.
        06/09/2011 – His own campaign staff resigned en masse.
        07/15/2011 – His poorly managed campaign is over $1 Million in debt.
        08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.
        08/11/2011 – His recent criticism of the United Nations is United Nations by a long, long history of supporting it.
        09/27/2011 – He says that he “helped develop the model for Homeland Security”.

  • bobby

    He has an issue over a long election cycle, how can he withstand the demanding schedule of a present ?

  • CA conservative

    What we really need is a candidate who will take the best from each of the currant contenders and form a candidate we can all support. Gingrich or Bachman could debate and win whereas Romney, Paul, and Perry are not talented speakers. Santorum and Bachman seem to be the only real conservatives. Ron Paul has many good ideas such as eliminating cabinet positions & their whole departments and radically changing the federal reserve and treasury but some of his foreign policy creates too much risk and he could never be elected. Gingrich and Romney are not socially conservative which would require compromising to elect one of them and it would cause a major block of voters to stay home as they did when RINO McCain ran. We don’t have a candidate. If Santorum was helped and adopted some of the other candidates good features he might be the best bet. For this to happen we would need to all contact his campaign and urge them to get onboard with this amalgamation and if they do then we need to throw ALL our support to him. (Or to any candidate who would do this.) The ones who can not speak well need to be dropped from consideration ie: Perry and Romney.

  • obrian

    “can’t we all just get along?” My goodness we all want change in the White House, anyone but obama! I’m a fan of Newt and have been since Reagan was the president and when Newt became speaker. I hope he does win the the GOP, at the same time if he didn’t I’d still support whomever the GOP decided even it was ron paul as wacky as he is.

  • qc

    Always found Ron Paul an interesting on constitutional matters, but after hearing his views on defense, Israel, & appeasment of the nation of islam, i’d not consider him in the primary. If by some cosmic glitch he was the republican nominee, i’d vote Paul 2012, better him than comrade barry obama (i think congressional ineptitude would limit his extremes). My concern would be tolerating all the Ron Paul ‘dittohead kooks’. They remind me of charles manson’s family, or lib kool-aid drinkers. …oh that was fun… Yeah, i said it!

  • JackK

    Ron Paul believes America caused the twin towers attacks themselves. He also said he would not of went after OSAMA,wants military prisoners in civilian criminal court, will not stand by our freinds in the world, wants to close 900 bases around the world. Deficit Spending began recently and we had the bases for decades so how can that be the problem. Evil exists in the world, and we are the ones to stop it, if not us then who? Isolationism will invite disaster and another World War. That is the reason we got attacked in ww2, we tried to keep isolated instead of being involved and that is what it got us. It did not have anything to do with we were having commerce with Great Britain like some here try to portray. If that is the case we should have no foreign trade or commerce at all. Ron Paul has a weak foreign policy that would begin the end of the free world as we know it. World War has been kept at bay since 1945 with the policies that are in place, why change something that is working from keeping a disaster from happening. With todays technology you can not close all the bases and expect to build them in the time of need in short order.It would be to late.

    • Pepper

      Did you watch the video I linked above?

      “would not have gone after OSAMA” – ever heard of “Letters of Marque and Reprisal?”
      “spending began recently” – can I have some of whatever it is you are smoking?
      “Ron Paul has a weak foreign policy” – watch the video I linked above, you have no idea what you are talking about.
      “why change something that is working” – because this is no longer the America I grew up in or learned about by reading history. It is becoming some sort of nightmare police state.

    • Bonnie

      What are you smokin’, Dude? Osama died in December 2001. Never said he would not stand by our friends. That’s right, the bases should have been closed YEARS ago. Evil will always be present in the world until Jesus Christ returns. Who said WE have to be the only ones to combat it, and we will, just that we don’t have to meddle in everyone else’s affairs. Ron Paul does NOT advocate ISOLATIONISM!! I repeat! RON PAUL DOES NOT ADVOCATE ISOLATIONISM!! HE IS (read my lips) for NON-INTERVENTION!!! That means we MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS!! And if our friends NEED us, we WILL be there! Ron Paul is very much for trade and friendship with ALL countries. The problem with our country today is that all America wants to do is police the world and bomb innocent people and take control of their countries. I know it seems natural because we’ve done it for the last 50 years, but believe me! It’s not necessary! You just think it is because that’s all you’ve ever known! Now I know you’re smokin’ somethin’ because you think we live in a free world. There is no country free in this world (unless it’s Switzerland and they are still free because they ARE isolationists!) I don’t know what planet you’re residing on, Jack K., but it surely can’t be earth. Ron Paul’s plan is peace with all countries (unless we’re attacked) and free trade. Right now, we don’t even have a trade to trade WITH! Thanks to Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama. Yes, that’s right. There is no difference in the two parties and hasn’t been for quite sometime. Guess you all need to brush up on the latest.

  • Terry Black

    To start off with – Go to youtube.com watch the video: Road To Tyranny

    This video really dishes out the evidence on 911

  • keith

    Yep, I have also noticed the war-mongering neocons thoroughly populate this site. Sad, they can’t see peace for their war-mongering posture. As long as we keep butting inti other countries’ business, we will continue being attacked and keep finding new enemies. Get out of other countries, let them take care of themselves and then we can take care of ourselves. Yep, if you support Romney, Gingrich, Perry or Huntsman, you are just as well to support Obama. The only difference in any of them is the letter after their names and the window dressing they put around that globalist window to make it more appealing to the masses. If you do your own research, you will find that none of those abdicated has any record that any conservative would even consider being conservative. Yet they are touted as if they are the epitome of Reagan? What a crock that is. These candidates, as well as their supporters pay lip service to the constitution and that is all. Ron Paul has a 30 year record of standing strictly on the constitution with every vote he has cast. Not one of the other candidates even come close to that. I would still support Bachmann or Santorum, but none of the others will get a vote from me. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil and I won’t vote for evil under any circumstance.

    • Bonnie

      I wish they had the “thumbs up” option on this forum!! You’d surely have at least 20!

  • Brent George

    Paul’s foreign policy with respect to our military presence is a strong defense of our borders, legitimate monetary/commerce/tax policy, and returning constitutional rights, responsibilities, and freedoms to true citizens of the sovereign nation of the United States of America. His foreign policy is predicated on that foundation. Gringrich/Romney want the status quo of what we have had on maybe a smaller scale. Our country needs a true, significant, radical change! Paul is the man.

  • http://wherewastheoutragefromHintz? andy

    As each candidate takes his turn leading here in Iowa the Paul machine starts its negative ad campaign to destroy them- such happens in politics – but Paul has largely not been vetted or a target of either the other candidates or the media- probably because none took him seriously till recently. If you have interest in Dr Paul as a candidate it behooves you to read about his past and many of his unadvertised postions:

    http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/2011/12/12/vetting-ron-paul-in-iowa-and-republican-primaries-who-is-going-to-do-it/
    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/05/ron-paul-calls-occupy-wall-street-a-legitimate-effort/
    http://www.realchange.org/ronpaul.htm

  • WhoKnows

    These polls are like so many tea leaves. The operator doesn’t actually read fortunes in tea leaves; he/she reads the subject, trying to hit on positive responses. What is most important to these professional pollsters: the numbers they throw out there or our response to their sudden revelations? This poll is either trying to push us towards Paul or gauge just how negatively we view him. No need to feel ecstatic or to feel doomed. Don’t let yourselves be influenced by media witchcraft. The only thing that counts is the actual tally of votes, and Iowans should not have any more of a say in the primary process than you or me. I honestly don’t know why the primaries don’t start and end at the same time in all states. Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida should not be the only ones to dictate the course: other states have different sets of cultural and economic priorities which are just as important to them. Letting some states go first to influence outcomes in others is a close cousin to Gerry Mander. And, I don’t know why Republican primaries are open to registered Democrats. Remember when candidates were picked at time of convention? At least back then we knew those with vested interest in the party, and only those with vested interest, picked the candidate. Now, at best, we’re self-programmed for failure. Overcoming this self-programming is a bloody difficult task, and well nigh impossible. The Republican Party, more than anyone else, has created the perfect climate for the formation of a third party. I’m not advocating it here — just suggesting that if it does happen, the GOP will have played a major role in its creation through their own stupidity.

  • DAVE32

    Our main objective is getting Obama out and hopefully in jail.

    • Timothy Brummer

      Has any candidate said they will put Obama into jail?

      • DAVE32

        No one, not even Congress.

  • John

    John Elmer Engel
    Yeah, Paul is kooky. He actually understands the DEBT of military adventurism. He understands it IS our foreign policy that threatens the USA. He fights for liberty for every American. He is the only candidate that wants to INCREASE our national DEFENSE. He hasn’t ripped off tax payers for $1.8 million. Obama and Romney are both fighting for Wall streets campaign money…duh….and somehow as president we will get something different???

    Ron Paul is the only guy that is fighting for the average American! Do you war-nuts think Obama or Bush or any of the present candidates have YOUR best interest in mind?? Wake-up. It is all about corporate/millitary/industrial/congressional ass kissing by all but RON PAUL.

    Our young soldiers are nothing more than a disposable commodity utilizing all of the newest kevlar bullet proof body armour, 20 ton, anti-IED vehicles, night vision radar goggles, the highest tech communication systems, and weapons with endless ammunition.

    Iran cannot…

    • blindenoughtosee

      John I totally agree keep up the good work .

  • http://www.americanchristiansociety.vpweb.com ChristianAmerican

    Sarah Palin should have taken them all on.
    The Republican establishment failed her. If we let them, they will fail Conservatives again. If they get behind Romney just because he’s next in line or they owe it to him. I’m out of the Republican Party. Romney is not the Reagan standard bearer. It should have been Palin. It now needs to be Perry or Newt.
    I will be tempted to go Independent and call out Sarah Palin and Donald Trump to run together on an Independent ticket. These two would destroy Obama and Bidden, and yes the Republican ticket of Romney and whoever.
    The Republican establishment doesn’t want Reagan Republicans, they want to maintain the status quo. Republican Progressives like the old Progressive regime.

    • WhoKnows

      Many in the GOP didn’t support him even when he was in office. They created as much doubt and tried to divide the nation as much as the democrats did. Now the GOP wants to drag the populist coattails they rode in on. To a man, candidates today try to conjure up Ronnie’s shade, so that he might publicly annoint them. Even O’bama tried to bless himself with Reagan, taking bits from a speech out of context. They all want to make hay with grass roots voters, now that they realize we little people have some small part in their election.

  • Clarence Jaeger

    In a speech in San Francisco, top Gen. Wesley Clark recounted a memo drafted by former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s office in the wake of 9-11 that was brought to his attention by a top Pentagon official. The neo-con’s plot, he was told, was “to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years—we’re going to start with Iraq and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Iran.” Clark said the neo-cons “wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, and make it under our control.” This plan was already established in 1991 by Defense official Paul Wolfowitz.
    Ron Paul said these people are not attacking us for what we are but for what we are doing to them. Is he right????

  • DAVE32

    As stated, Our main objective is getting Obama out and hopefully in jail as he has issued a Birth Certificate on April 27,2011 that is a complete forgery. He has also had Supreme Court cases removed from Justia.com ( an online legal behemoth) records inorder to hid that he is not legally in the WH.

  • Eileen

    Newt and Romney are big government republicans. We really need a change , no more government regulations that keep American businesses from competing in the free market. Get rid of government restrictions and America will boom again. No more bail outs. Obama gave money to Mexico to drill in the Gulf, but has restricted Americans from drilling. He won’t approve the canadian pipe line which would make us less dependent on OPEC. If I didn’t know better I would say that Obama and the democrats are delibertly trying to bankrupt this country and line their own pockets. I like Bahmann and Santorum onservative ideas, but they don’t have the momentum and I don’t know how they would do in a debate with Obama. It seems more and more apparent that Romney maybe the republican candidate and I guess I will hold my nose and vote for him. I hope he will do better then Obama.

  • Patriot

    Because Dr. Paul actually has been there long enough to accumulate some wisdom and tells us the unpopular truth, that we can’t afford the budget we used to fund, you want to call him a coward and isolationist. Some people just can’t grasp simple economics and budgeting.

    • Pepper

      You speak truth. Won’t last long around here, I fear.

    • AlleyOops

      That’s precisely the point, Ron Paul has been in Congress for 40 plus years and has little if anything to show for it other than he’s managed to live off of the government teat and reap the perks that go with the position…His position on many things go against the grain of conventional wisdom…particularly his views on foreign policy are dangerous.

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        ALLEY, RON PAUL NEEDS TO RETIRE, HE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE TOO LONG…WE NEED TERM LIMITS TO GET THESE SO CALLED IDIOTS WE HAVE IN OFFICE OUT, THE ONES THAT HAVE BEEN IN OFFICE FOR MANY YEARS ARE DANGEROUS..THEY ARE ONLY THINKING OF THEM SELVES, GETTING RE-ELECTED, GETTING RICH ,TOO MANY PERKS, TOO MANY BENEFITS { LUXURY STYLE } THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE AS WE DO BECAUSE WE ARE PAYING FOR THEM, WHY DON’T THEY HAVE DEDUCTIBLE FROM THEIR PAY AS WE DO, WHY SHOULD THEIR SPOUSES GET THE SAME RETIREMENT AS THEY DO , DO WE ????? SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE !!

  • http://tmarcum@yahoo.com Terry Marcum

    After reading all this I’m very happy to be moving to Idaho. I’ll live as long as I can until Obama sends the Seiu to try to put me in a FEMA camp. Yes! He will still be in office because so many of you have lost your minds and will refuse to unite to stop him.

  • Ken

    Not surprised at Gingrich’s fall given his stupid comments like “sending marshalls to arrest liberal judges” . Duh! This is exactly the right wing version of what the left wing idiot in the White House would do if given the chance. And Ron Paul is no substitue for anyone, not even Obammy. Paul is a blithering idiot who could’nt lead a bridge club let alone a country.

  • JCA

    How, in good conscience, anyone could prefer Ron Paul over Newt Gingrich is beyond my comprehension. Ron Paul has NO PLAN for anything. He is a Barack Obama with Obamas’ “I’m for change!” Folks, you need to research these candidates some before making a choice. The only person who HAS EVER DONE ANYTHING TO BENEFIT AMERICA in this group is Newt Gingrich. He did more in the 80′s and 90′s than anyone ever has for this nation except Ronald Reagan. Newt has proved time and again he knows what is best for the US and he proved he knows how to get things done, with or without either a Dem or Rep majority in congress, even with a Dem president. Mit Romney is a tried and true lib/conservative flip-flopper from day one; Bachman is a frustrated housewife who is quick to lie about Newt if she thinks it will help (even her own sources say she is wrong) Rick Perry is an honest to God good Governor and the only other candidate who might make a credible leader. Think about a Gingrich/Perry ticket. The rest are guarantees of ‘four more years’ of down slope liberalism,-with or without Obama. Remember, this is not a popularity contest. It is for the future of America where courage, proven ability and experience are crucial.

    • Timothy Brummer

      Gingrich/Perry? You are kidding right? That would be certain defeat, or if somehow they won it would be the end of the USA, what remains would be handed to globalist banksters.

    • Pepper

      “Ron Paul has NO PLAN for anything.” Really, let’s see about that shall we?

      - $1 TRILLION cut from the budget in year 1. NOBODY else is talking about cutting anything other than repealing Obamacare. With the other candidates we will be bankrupt and our currency will be destroyed.
      - Eliminate FIVE cabinet level departments.
      - Bring the troops home. Protect our nation’s borders.
      - VETO any bill that is unconstitutional.
      - etc., etc. all laid out in easy to read format for those who will take the time to learn instead of spouting misinformation.

      http://thinkbynumbers.org/blog/government-spending/spending-cuts-budget-2012-republican-primary-candidates-compared/
      http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

      • AlleyOops

        For Ron Paul to even come close to getting done what you are suggesting is naivete in spades….There’s a house and senate that has to make into law any changes to what already exists…just look at the trouble Obama is having getting anything accomplished.

      • JCA

        Pepper, if you vote for me, I will reduce the deficit by 12,000,000,ooo,000 (trillion) dollars the first year. And, like ALL THE CANDIDATES, I will bring our troops home and, LIKE ALL THE CANDIDATES, I will cut any cabinet position that is not needed. And LIKE ALL THE CANDIDATES, I will veto any bill which is unconstitutional. Oh, and please send me the maximum contribution of $2,500.00.
        Sincerely, JCA…

  • Paul or I leave the party

    Well if he’s wacky and weak on the military I find it strange that our military donates more money to his campaign then all the other republicans combined. So I guess they are just as dumb as myself for supporting him. Way to support your troops America.

    • AlleyOops

      I keep hearing that Paul is receiving money from the men and women who are currently in or have served in the military….Please be more specific and tell us exactly how my money the Paul campaign has received from the military….I’m a veteran of the Korean war and the only people that have contacted me for money are Bachman, Cain, Perry & Newt.

      • Paul

        At this web site you can get the answer to your question and many others. You can also donate there. Don’t wait to be asked. This ain’t the Army but it is just as important if not more so. I served in WW-II and have watched what we did go down the drain. Dr. Paul gives me hope.
        http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

        • http://www.jcadla.net JCA

          In the first place, Paul is not a REPUBLICAN. He is a radical Libertarian. In this global day and age, the things he proposes, such as isolationism, are not possible. And to say, anyone can do as they please as long as it doesn’t affect anyone else, is silly. Every thing anyone does affects someone else. This might have been true in 1790 but not today. And why do you keep calling him Doctor? Newt is the only one here who deserves that title. Doctor of Politics. You must really want Obama to serve another four years. He will if Ron Paul is our nominee.

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    Who is John Galt?

  • DrewbeScrewed

    All one has to do is look at Neville Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement. This makes Ron Paul no different than Obama. The impact on the country and the world would be one and the same.

  • Angela

    What is wrong with Iowans? I thought they were people of intelligence! Ron Paul is a Rhino LIBERAL! He would destroy our military and allow people to do whatever they wanted. This country needs a COSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT. On e that loves this country and what the founders intended for our laws to do. Paul hates the Constitution, and like obummer blames 9/11 on America! DOes that sound like a leader you would vote for? My goodness, Romney is a progressive that will NEVER repeal the obamacare health bill. Newt Gingrich is the only sound CONSERVATIVE on the panel with the intelligence to debate obummer and WIN!

    • Timothy Brummer

      You obviously don’t know what Libertarian means, it means liberty (freedom), not “liberal”, those people are simply “liberal” with our money. Those two are at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

    • Pepper

      “This country needs a COSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT. On e that loves this country and what the founders intended for our laws to do. Paul hates the Constitution”

      - Good lord woman, what have you been drinking? I absolutely can think of no way to respond to this which you’d comprehend. Black is white, water isn’t wet.

    • AlleyOops

      What’s wrong with Iowa….Let me try and explain:…Unemployment is at 6% which is well below the national average….Iowa farmers are living high off the subsidised hog as corn, hogs, cattle, soybeans and other commodities are at an almost historic high…Corn sold for ethanol creates a shortage to the domestic market and thus demands a higher price…When Iowa farmers prosper so does the rest of the state that provides them with goods and services….

  • JoAnn Melloh

    Ron Paul could not debate his fanny out of a paper bag !!!!! We need someone who can turn an answer on a dime (and be correct) and right now, the only person that can do that is Newt. It’s time for the US to get tough. Right now with Obama in office we look like a bunch of wimps. Obama is taking away our self respect, rights, pride, not to mention our money. In all my years, I have never seen a president take sooooooo many vacations at a time when the president should be in Washington. With all the good and bad that our elected officials do with our tax dollars, not giving a damn about who pays their salary it’s time we get someone in there that does. Ron Paul should be making flower arrangements or something.

    • Timothy Brummer

      They are not running for Debater in Chief.

  • singer23

    IF, “OLD DOCTOR PAUL” GETS THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION, GOODBYE AMERICA! WE WILL HAVE AT LEAST, FOUR MORE YEARS OF OBAMA!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      SINGER, RAH, RAH, CHEERS FOR YOU…VERY TRUE !!!

    • Sumerian Man

      First of all, Jesus Christ himself would have a hard trying to save this country from itself. Secondly, you have been shown the light, over and over and over, yet you refuse to see. Third, and most importantly, not one of the candidates other than Ron Paul has openly stated that they have a sustainable plan to save this country, I SAID THIS COUNTRY! Screw Israel, dump Egypt, to hell with Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Middle East. China needs to be completely cutoff and out of everything U.S. forever! If we can’t save ourselves how the hell can we expect to help anybody else. This is our last chance to regain our sovereignty and our Constitutional Rights. If you think for one second anyone else in this election will really put us, the legal citizens of America first, you are fatally mistaken. This is the peoples last chance for survival in this battle for America, don’t blow it because so and so says this about Ron, or the polls and the media say that about Ron. Ron Paul is a true American with nothing but the welfare of America on his agenda, thank God, at a time when America needs him most! To vote any other way is nothing less than genocide. And yes, I know what genocide means. Wake Up! For Gods sake, Wake Up!

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    Rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic?

  • Paul or I leave the party

    The strongest foreign policy we could invision would come from a Paul regime. No more gaining hatred around the world our troops on our own soil protecting our borders. Is this a neo con site? I’ve seen few that understand anything but a Fox News propaganda piece. Report to your fema camps soon. Without Paul say I’m crazy but read the defense bill.

  • Weasler

    If these “polls” are accurate – and I have my doubts about that – then it’s time that Americans took off the gloves and put this looney bird Ron Paul in his place. He’s a very dangerous man.

    Paul’s idea of letting every thug, dictator, and terrorist do whatever the hell he wants just so long as he stays away from the USA is insanity. And BTW, just to see a guy like this get this far has got to make our allies and those who depend upon the USA very nervous.

    Here in the USA, Paul’s idea of legalizing drugs is BEYOND insanity. And that provides a very plausible explanation as to why his supporters are such fanatics -he’s a modern day Pied Piper.

    Hopefully, the so-called media will finally do its job and show us all just what a “President Ron Paul” would mean to this country. Think we have problems now? You would not BELIEVE what havoc THIS guy would create.

    • Timothy Brummer

      Why is that insanity? If you don’t like the thugs and dictators around the world, form a private army to go fight them.

      • Weasler

        Gee, what a brilliant comment. And you spelled that out all by yourself, huh?

      • Weasler

        Your incredible comment really intrigues me. I wonder if you can just take a few moments, employ all 12 of your brain cells, and try to think of a reason why we would want to stop thugs, dictators, and terrorists in this world, including those who do NOT attack us. Go on, try. See if you can do it.

        I’ll set my stopwatch. Ready, set, GO!

    • Pepper

      Yes, it would be terrible if people ever experienced real freedom for a change. Then your kind would never have another chance at controlling their lives from cradle to grave.

      You won’t be swayed by facts, as you used none while making your four paragraph ad hominem attack. So I won’t bother telling you where to find them, though they are quite plentiful and well documented.

      • Weasler

        Real freedom to do WHAT? Become a drug addict? Oh, yes! I really miss THAT!

        Sorry, but your response is a cop-out. You have something to say, then say it, not that I’m interested in hearing your supposed “facts”.

        • Pepper

          I did say it, I’ll say it again. You used no facts to construct that original argument, therefore it is invalid. If any of what you said is true, please provide links so that I can become more enlightened.

          • Weasler

            OK, dog brain, tell me. Exactly what assertions have a I need require “facts”? Be specific.

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    I’m going ‘off the grid’.

    We’ll see how you’re doin’ four years from now.

    Lot’s of luck, suckers.

  • Tammy

    Everyone with ONE OUNCE OF A BRAIN KNOWS…..that TARP was the single most EVIL HEIST on the American people ever committed in history….and yet every candidate besides Ron Paul has the AUDACITY to call himself a conservative. IF YOU SUPPORTED TARP YOU ARE STUPID. http://thenewamerican.com/economy/commentary-mainmenu-43/8725-forget-tarp-the-real-bailout-came-from-the-fed What TARP was was either history’s greatest plain-sight heist or history’s biggest and most costly welfare program for the rich. TARP was one of the biggest economic mistakes in human history. It consequences are only now emerging and will be felt for decades.

    There is no problem with the real global economy–people who mine, farm and make real things and perform services other than shuffling money around. The problem is all in finance.

    Specifically, it resides in the $600 trillion (no, that’s not a typo) of outstanding derivatives, more accurately described as gambling instruments that bet on uncertain future events. That’s short of twice the size of the net worth of the entire US economy based on current interest rates and a GDP of 15 trillion—one gigantic casino!

    Bailing out gamblers (banks) who lose money in this gigantic casino (as our government did after the Crash of 2008) is not a sustainable solution to our economic crisis. It will only encourage more gambling.
    http://mobile.bloomberg.com/comments/2011-12-05/federal-reserve-s-stress-tests-won-t-fix-a-flawed-financial-system-view

    • JCA

      “…IF YOU SUPPORTED TARP YOU ARE STUPID…”
      IF YOU SUPPORT RON PAUL, YOU ARE STUPID. Please come out of your stupor and take a better look at the only man qualified to lead us;-Newt Gingrich…

  • Wilbur

    Ron Paul speaks the truth. We cannot continue to police the world and spend billions of dollars we don’t have to remove mickey mouse dictators from Islamo-nazi countries all over the mid-east. We are too politically correct to just take the oil we should get after spending billions and sacrificing our troops and as soon as we leave another dicator that hates us takes over. Shut down the bases in Germany. Shut down the bases in Korea and Japan (they don’t want us there anyway), and seal our borders, stop illegal and legal immigration. Time to take care of our own before the entire country crumbles and riots and chaos ensues.

  • http://www.ivegotcoverage.com/72018526 servant

    A New YORK TIMES POLL? REALLY????
    If they write today is Monday, I’d first check my calendar!
    Regarding ANY THING even smelling of Conservatism, and they print it, more than not, it would not be the truth!
    The Lame Mass Media equals the B.H.O. Re-election headquarters, pure, plain and simple!
    What’s more they are ALL. . . quite proud of this fact, and they have absolutely no shame in the fact that for them factual news reporting died when BHO announced his run for State Office, and hauled ALL his water, without shame or apology, ever since!
    Thus for them there’s NO TRUTH IN ADVERTIZING, PERIOD!

  • teaman

    It’s obvious that Representative Paul has a staunch following that supports him come what may. Ignoring the legion of so-called ‘Paul-bots’ who seem able to descend on every internet poll and straw poll like flies to a carcass, I wonder more about the nature of their support. I’ve known a number of Ron Paul’s supporters, and they seem to have some very good ideas, but the ideas they offer aren’t in any way impeded or tempered by reality. While I also like some of Ron Paul’s positions, he suffers from an all-too-convenient naiveté with respect to certain issues that make of him a questionable candidate at best. Despite his virtues on some very important issues, his moral agnosticism on others brands him unsuitable to restore the American nation, now wounded and bleeding profusely in the escalating Obama disaster.

    Mr. Paul is strong on general economic principles, but weak on firm ideas for implementation of them. He says he would do many of the things in the sphere of economics that would likely serve to improve the general economy, and his notions about private property rights(including earnings and wealth) are fantastic. In this respect, he is far superior to the RINO contingent that is composed of Romney, Pawlenty, Huntsman and Gingrich, and it certainly exceeds the macro-economic worldview of former Federal Reserve Board member Herman Cain. The problem is that Mr. Paul doesn’t tell us anything of substance about what he would do to reform things. Yes, he supports the US Constitution’s view of a laissez faire economy, but he doesn’t ever get around to explaining in detail where he thinks government involvement should begin, if ever.

    Mr. Paul is also strong on his general commitment to deal with our ballooning entitlements problem. His view on how to implement a solution is nevertheless far too radical for the general public. He would, if he could, end all entitlements today. For a person like me, who studies economics, it’s a numerically satisfying answer, but the truth is that such an approach would never likely see the light of day, and would wrench people from their current situations, already stressed by inflation, and deposit them directly into poverty. I hardly see such an abrupt, ham-handed approach to entitlement reform as plausible, never mind practical. It’s simply not something you could end overnight, though it’s certain that you could begin on that path with a more pragmatic plan. This one issue guarantees that Mr. Paul cannot be elected. With over 60% of the public receiving some form of non-wage payment from the Federal government, it’s clear that such a constituency dooms Mr. Paul’s candidacy once they understand his views fully.

    • CA conservative

      teaman, I agree with you. I only wish that a good speaker/debater would adopt some of Paul’s views and present a plan for implementing them. We need a Conservative candidate that we can all rally around if there is to be any hope for the future.

  • David

    You idiots think that McCain was bad for the Party, Paul would implode the Party and end it as a viable political entity. Obama would go on to victory….again :(

  • Craig

    Ron Paul? Are people nuts? I think it’s die hard Obama democrats skewing the polls. RP is dangerous. They know Obama will tear up RP. But no chance with Newt or maybe Mitt. Don’t let a democrat surge sway you.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      CRAIG, YES WE HAVE SOME NUTS OUT THERE, ALL THESE PEOPLE WRITING ABOUT RON PAUL ARE LIBERALS, DEMOCRATS IN DISGUISE SO WE ALL NEED TO IGNORE THEM AS WE NOW KNOW WHAT THEIR GAME PLANS ARE…WILL NOT WORK, WE WILL NOT BE SWAYED IN ANY WAY…NICE TRY LIBERALS, STUPID DEMOCRATS, WE ALL KNOW HOW YOU PEOPLE DO YOUR UNDERHANDED, BEHIND CLOSED DOOR DEALS , YOU WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET WHAT YOU WANT, CROOKEDNESS, LIES , ON & ON, GIVE IT UP !!!

  • mike turner

    I will only vote for Ron Paul , either GOP or 3rd party , done with the rest of these failures and frauds

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      MIKE, OF COURSE YOU WOULD …. 3RD PARTY WILL BE A SHOE IN FOR OBAMA…RON PAUL WOULD GET THE AX ALSO, YOU KNOW IT & WE KNOW IT… BY THE WAY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT OBAMA WHEN YOU SAY FAILURES & FRAUD ??? HE IS THE FRAUD, FAILURE IN OFFICE, WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN THE LAST 3 YEARS, OH I FORGOT YOU ARE AN OBAMA LOVER !!

  • mike turner

    Obama has ZERO chance against Ron Paul , do your homework people stop Parroting

  • Carmelo Junior

    Make history! Nominate Michelle Bachmann!! Let’s take down Obama!

    • WhoKnows

      Heck fire, that is a future I can live with!

  • mike turner

    If “Old Dr. Paul doesnt get the nomination Good bye GOP we will win with him as a 3rd party, this is the candidate, get your asses in line

  • Paul or I leave the party

    Neo cons are cowards and war mongers. We’re broke neo cons the dollar is on life support Ron Paul will save this country from complete bankruptcy. And yes we an no longer afford to police the world Israel are big boys with big toys they can destroy Iran at any time they choose. Quit war mongering chicken hawks.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      PAUL, HOW MUCH ARE ALL YOU LIBERALS, DEMOCRATS GETTING PAID FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO ADVERTISE RON PAUL ON THIS WEB SITE ?? IT IS TOO OBVIOUS NOW, THAT YOU ALL ARE TRYING TO USE REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY HOPING TO GET SOME OF THE NUT JOBS TO VOTE FOR PAUL…WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO THE NITTY GRITTY YOU ALL WILL LOSE…. GOD BLESS AMERICA !

    • Carmelo Junior

      This old ugly boring troll whacko is a Libertarian

  • Herb

    Ron Paul has alot of good ideas on the economy and I actually like his constitutional stand on things. We probably do create alot of our own problems with our foreign policy. However, we were drawn into 2 world wars because we tried to isolate ourselves from the rest of the world.
    Two hundred years ago we had two large oceans protecting us from serious threats from abroad. This is no longer the case. ICBM’s can be here in about a hour and do considerable damage. Other nasty weapons can be snuck in and used rather easily. Like it or not we are the world superpower and maybe the world policeman. With that maybe we can help prevent the next world war.
    I think Ron, Newt, Bachman, or Ronmey all have some good ideas and would be better than Obama. But let’s don’t let the liberals keep us fighting among ourselves. That just gives them weapons to use against us in the general election next year.

    • CA conservative

      Herb, you said it! We have to stop bickering. Anyone who helps Obummer is an enemy of our country. If Ron Paul splits the party he is no lover of the Constitution.

  • Reinhold Sommerstedt

    Those that love the truth love Ron Paul. Those that love the lie hate Ron Paul. The failure of the liars has made Ron Paul relevant and worthy.
    Arrogant Progressive, rjgarfunkel says he is a “middle-of-the -road business type Democrat” He admits FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ and Bill Clinton the model leaders of the Democratic Party has supported progressive issues throughout the 20th Century.
    Those of us that love the truth better than the lie – love what Samuel Adams called the “Animating Contest of Freedom recognize that neither party has provided honest leaders but only those that disparage our LAW. This rigarfunkel says he is a “Progressive” and that he is.
    Before Marxist doctrine was called “Communism” Marxist Bolsheviks called their doctrine, “Progressive.” It is this anti-Christian doctrine that has destroyed what made America great. America has ceased to be great because America has ceased to be good. The many here that disparage Ron Paul define the failed character that has emerged in America. These have embraced the doctrine of servitude. They selfishly grasp the neck of their rescuer. The disease is re self-love of narcissism. These that claim the middle of the road are actually hogging the road in order to dominate all others. The Bolshevist claims to be the majority by denial of the existence of all others. They love only the bogus liberty of the Cabala of the Bogus bank of Credit Fraud. They deny that Ron Paul is a True Statesmen that represents The People. Not the LIARS. These selfish PIGS- Parasites In Government Service hate Ron Paul because they hate the truth. We celebrate candidacy of Ron Paul because he has returned the truth to the forum. If these that hate him deny his truth and even if these LIARS seek to kill him we shall not retreat. No, instead we shall advance with ever increasing vigor. Our purpose is to destroy the LIE because we Christians are promised. “You shall know the truth and the truth will make you free.” Should we be denied liberty by peaceful persuasion, we shall achieve Liberty by compelling force. Our enemies defend the synagogue of satan at their peril. We come in peace, our opponents love war. We witness the truth, our opponents love the lie. Peace is better than war. The Truth is better than the Lie. The Cabala of the Bogus Bank of Credit Fraud has failed. END THE FED

  • Julian

    I wonder if the RNC or the GOP would let Paul have the nomination if he won it. Compare his policies to Obama’s and I don’t see how he could loose. Many respondants replied with “I read somewhere that Paul”, that is the problem the liberal media has been trying to discredit Paul from the start. What do you KNOW about Ron Paul? Everything I know says he is currently the only hope America has to undue Obama’s policies and NOT go back to the Bush years.

    • Restore Constitutional Government

      The GOP is sinking. Ron Paul is leading the flotilla of life boats that are abandoning the GOP ship.
      Call it whatever you want, there’s a ‘new’ Party forming from the traditional moderate-conservative character and soul of our true American citizenry.
      It won’t be a third party, it will be the overwhelming majority and the survivor of both failed parties.

  • Patrick Henry

    I can NOT and will NEVER trust NEWT…….

  • Learner

    Gingrich is the only canditate capeable of bringing America out of this finincial Socialistic mess. America awaken, time is pressing the Liberty of America !

  • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

    Ron Paul is your only hope. If Paul is not the nominee, you WILL get Obama.

    Fact: Republicans / Democrats cannot win elections without third party, independent, and crossover votes.

    Ron Paul has almost all of the Independents, and most of the third party like the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party

    Ron Paul has many of the Democrats (Blue Republicans) Mostly the Democrats who were against the wars and realize that Obama lied to them. He also has the young people who voted for Obama thinking they were getting some kind of change.

    Ron Paul also has a very strong base of core supporters who will not vote for anyone except for Ron Paul even if it is a write-in.

    Then you have the latest Republican poll what says 80% of the Republicans will support any Republican candidate who gets the nomination, even if it’s Ron Paul just to beat Obama.

    Now crunching the numbers, it becomes clear that if Ron Paul is not chosen as the nominee, you can count on losing all this support and you WILL get Obama for four more years. On the other hand, if Ron Paul becomes the nominee, it is a guaranteed win for the Republicans.

    • JCA

      Ron Paul should stop insulting us by calling himself a Republican.

      • Sumerian Man

        Your one to talk? You even know what a Republican is? Ron Paul is a Republican from the very essence of the word. Get educated.

  • teaman

    Mr. Paul is likewise a critic of the Federal Reserve. He realizes that the Fed constitutes an un-elected, un-accountable body that has far too much power in the general economy. Having never been audited by Congress, Mr. Paul rightly explains that we need to examine the Federal Reserve with a mind to sun-setting the institution. Once again, while it’s easy to make such profoundly sweeping statements because they appeal to large numbers of people, the truth is that there can be no easy removal or replacement of the Federal Reserve’s functions without substantial planning. He offers none of that. There is at least one other Republican prospect who has challenged Federal Reserve policy, but Mr. Paul’s ‘ejection seat’ mentality is not a serious way to begin.

    The seat of Mr. Paul’s popularity seems to be with the drug legalization crowd. When viewing lop-sided poll results on some website, it is tempting(and probably not far off the mark) to imagine a legion of basement-dwelling ne’er-do-wells who like to smoke a bit of the wacky-weed as they wax philosophic on their pro-Paul blogs. Still, it’s fair to say that there is an undeniable logic to Rep. Paul’s view that as sovereigns over their own lives and bodies, people ought to be able to choose freely what to inject or snort or smoke. I fully understand this libertarian lynch-pin, but I also recognize that until you put in place a system of absolute civil and criminal liability for the conduct of people under such influence, there can be no practical manner in which to protect the rights and the lives of the rest of us. At a cocktail party, I’m sure it’s a fine-sounding policy position, but in practice, that becomes just so much happy-talk once a person’s life has been snuffed by an officially sanctioned cocaine-snorter who takes them out in a head-on.

    Mr. Paul also seems to be the beneficiary of true isolationism. I view isolationism as the naive view of the world that believes it is possible to withdraw to your own borders, and expect the rest of the world to simply leave you be. I am supportive of withdrawing our troops where they are not really needed in the furtherance of our vital interests, and I am much in favor of the idea of telling the United Nations to pack up and re-establish their socialist playground in Brussels, but I also realize that this is a dangerous world growing still more dangerous as nuclear weapons are now in the hands of the Pakistanis and North Koreans, and will soon enough be in the hands of the Iranians. Any person who thinks that the United States will be safer as a result of a global withdrawal simply isn’t playing with a full deck, and constitutes a danger to the country through a genuinely adolescent view of the world.

    In much the same way, Ron Paul seems to believe that the withdrawal of all foreign aid of any sort will bear budgetary fruits while reducing our moral hazards. Again, Mr. Paul is simply wrong, and while foreign aid has long been the object of sloganeering, the truth is that total US foreign aid is a tiny proportion of our budget. I believe we need to examine all of it, but I also know that some of it does bear fruit. For instance, we’ve supported Israel at some expense, but by doing so, we’ve also generally maintained a higher level of stability than would otherwise result. Why do we care? Simply put, until we have a President committed to developing our own energy resources, our economy depends upon the energy source that is the Middle East. Pretending this isn’t the current situation won’t protect us from the consequences. There are other prospects who more thoroughly understand the importance of developing our own resources first. While we develop our own energy resources, the stability of the Middle East is critical to our nation’s health. Just the last eight months of events in the region, and their effect on the global economy, demonstrates the point in economic terms in a way no mere policy position ever will.

  • old ben

    poor paul i am shure mow that he is one of those botched abortions. some do live if you can cal a person with no brain living,

    • Sumerian Man

      This coming from a guy born with a coat hanger still around his neck, makes for a nice baby picture.

  • Steve

    I pray Ron Paul has a weak forign policy because you fools are suckers and will get us all in WW3. Now the Gingrich record.
    1. 1978 voted for Dept of education and won 210 to 206
    2. voted to give 600 million acres to the fed gov ( Alaska)
    3. 1980 voted for china to get most favored Nation
    4.Voted for tax payer subsidized to the Soviet union
    5.Voted to transfer 2.2 mil acres of land from Idaho to the fed
    6.Started and voted to have Federally funded loan Guarantees.
    7.voted for taxpayer funds available to foreigh governments export import banks
    8.Amnesty to illegal immigrants
    9.Voted for foreign aid
    10.1994 funding for national endowment for the arts
    11.1994 voted for extra 1.2 bill for unpeacekeping
    12.13 billion in foreign aid 1994
    13.166 million to the IRS 1994
    14.31.8 billion in foregn aid 1995
    15.1995 Voted against cutting foreign aid 1%
    16,Time Mag Man of the Year
    17.Student deferment Durring Vietnam War
    18.Campained for Nelson Rockefiller 1965
    19.1990 CFR Member
    20.1994 As speaker he got GaT Passed. World bank,World trade org
    21.Newt favorit is FDR and Wilson written in his book
    22.Clinton programs Newt Saved from defunding EPA,National service org,Goals 2000 program for schools, Federal finance of local police, unpeacekeeping Missions for US service
    men. Source John Burch Society.
    You conservitives are all Fools. Send your kids to war Not Mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Billy J. Cooper

    Yes I agree, Ron Paul does from time to time have some pretty good ideas. But then on the otherhand, he needs to be very careful when he is out side. The squirrels are likely to come after him, Because the squirrels know a nut when they see one.

  • Chuck

    I think Pauls foriegn policy is full of dangerous ideas. I was leaning towards Newt but his idea’s on the courts and the drug war and the death penalty for pot growers/sellers are even wackier than Pauls. I want Obama out of there to save the Country, but sit this election out if it’s either of them.

    • AlleyOops

      Newt’s views on the courts are right on the money….Judges were never meant to create law, only to judge its’ constitutionality…but to rule from the bench is not within the purview of judges.

  • teaman

    Mr. Paul claims to support the constitutional concept of federalism, but it’s a tainted view of federalism that contemplates a level of latitude to states they ought not possess with respect to the rights of individual citizens. Under our constitutional system, if a right exists, it exists in all places under our constitution at once, and is not subject to the vagaries of state or local governance. This dangerous misunderstanding of federalism would allow states to restrict rights otherwise made explicit by the Constitution. Freedom of speech ought not be a concept restricted to observance by federal departments alone.

    Doing justice to Mr. Paul requires an honest examination of his positions. He’s formidable on a number of issues in the essential sphere of economic liberty, but sadly, that’s where Mr. Paul’s value as a candidate ends, in large measure because he proposes no practical method by which to implement these ideas in law. Stating these undeniable truths about Ron Paul’s glaring shortcomings is to do justice to the electorate. There are others who understand the realities of our dangerous world. Many Paul supporters believe it is impossible to vote for any other candidate without falling prey to the ‘lesser of two evils’ choice. I beg to differ, but were I to consider who belongs on the very short list of ‘not evil,’ it wouldn’t include Dr. Paul, if only because it is impossible to suggest, with a straight face, that Mr. Paul, having served in Washington as long as he has, doesn’t understand the clear danger of his undeveloped and ambiguous policy generalizations, and if he does, it is impossible to place Paul on any such list.

    • Martin Ridens

      Trying the intellectual approach doesn’t work very well on those of us who have studied the Constitution and Dr. Paul’s positions and the principles America was founded on and the dedication to those principles that made us great. Try studying more. BTW using words like “undeniable truths” is only good propaganda for the non-intellectual approach.

    • Michael

      Dr. Paul is the Champion of the Constitution. You are wrong he doesn’t think the states should have the power. He thinks the people from the states should have the power. The Federal Government should have very little power except what is authorized by the Constitution all other powers are given to the people. The Federal Government is supposed to protect us from the States that try to take away our Constitutional Rights not take the power from the states and then take away our Constitutional Rights like they are now with the Patriot Act and the Defense Authorization Act.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Yes, because the Patriot Act (1 & 2) is constitutional. So is SOPA. So is the National Defense Authorization Act.

      Do your homework people! We (the people) are getting screwed.

      Live free or die.
      Those who sacrifice liberty for a little temporary security deserve neither.

      Ron Paul 2012!

  • Martin Ridens

    Here is something about foreign policy you should all see.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMHBEAeNa-c

  • Terry Black

    There will be Shills who will hide behind the people and go for the great smear of Ron Paul, just as was done when Rand Paul won Kentucky!

    That is because there are those in power whose literal bottoms will be sitting on the hot seat with all of the tyranny they have committed!

    Ron Paul is such a gentlemen, I will hope and pray that the Lord gives him the strength to stand up to the manipulation that is to come!

    Another great video that has shone the light for me is on youtube, called – 911 Revisited: Were explosives Used?

  • Martin Ridens
  • MAC

    Ron Paul is a moral anarchist. Before he ran for president he had only a 57% pro-life voting record with National Right to Life. He simply will not defend marriage and the importance of mothers and fathers for the next generation of children. He was one of only 8 people in the whole US House who voted against criminalizing child porn created with digitized images. He said on the floor that he opposed “actual porn” totally ignoring what kind of scum would wnat to view digitized images and the danger they pose to families. He twice voted against making it a crime to illegally transport a minor across state lines in violation of state parental notification laws for an illegal abortion. He voted against making feticide, killing a viable unborn child, a crime in the commission of a federal crime. He says that he opposes taxes going to planned parenthood, but didn’t show up to vote for it last month. He says had be been there for the vote, he would have voted against protecting the national motto “In God We Trust” from radical secularist. And the list goes on and on. . . (there is a reason why some Hollywood liberals like John Stewart who hate conservative republicans, like Ron Paul.)
    And then there is his obsession with national suicide when it comes to his foreign policy. . .
    Paul has some good points in terms of fiscal matters, but that’s about it. . . he’s a disaster when it comes to the Reagan success model coalition of social, fiscal and national defense interests. .. but then again, Ron Paul was not much of a Reagan Republican either. Wake up Iowa, don’t do this to the rest of our nation. . . supporting Ron Paul weakens the Republican party and helps Barack Obama.

  • Patriot7

    These polls are absolutely useless. There is no validity to them whatsoever since the undecided voters will be the ones who determine the final outcome. One should give no heed to these polls because they only reflect the changing emotional political climate at one point in time and could change completely at any moment.

    • Jerry

      A great vote of confidence!!!!!!

    • AlleyOops

      You’re right….don’t believe the polls when they go against your candidate…only believe the polls when they favor your candidate….:))

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    ***Caution***
    Troll Crossing

  • Shane Mayfield

    Ron Paul is the only honest person running for president. All the others are owned by BIG money. So anyone that is bad mouthing Ron Paul is either being paid to do so or has their head up their a$$. Someone needs to stop all this government spending of money we do not have! Ron Paul is the only one that can save America. Anyone else wins and we’ll have four more years of the same old sh$t.

    • WhoKnows

      He is absolutely honest to a fault. That is why he is running for the Republican nomination instead of the Libertarian nomination. He has declared the political poles as being: 1) those for welfare or 2) those for war. We know the welfare party is the Democrat party. So who in the world could Paul be calling a bunch of warmongers? hmmm…. could it be… Republicans? Yet he wants their vote even after slapping them around a bit. Ron Paul is nothing more than the second coming of Ross Perot.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        No. Ron Paul believes that both the Republicans and the Democrats have warmongers. He is correct.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          You would support a party before you would support our troops. No wonder our country is in trouble! There are too many people like you voting.

          • WhoKnows

            You sure walked in the door backwards there bud. I support a person depending on their policy, and I may support a party only if I identify with the platform. (How does that equal not supporting my troops?) My point, which missed you, is that Ron Paul acts as if the GOP and Republican voters in general are his opposition but he has no problem running on their ticket. You call that honest? If he doesn’t win the Republican nomination, how much would you be willing to bet (rhetorically) that he will take his toys and run as Independent or other third party? How many Republican candidates who lose the nomination would hand the election to Obama by doing that? THAT is why I say Ron Paul is another Ross Perot.

  • Jerry

    For the conservatives, there is none better than NEWT! Not for what he has done but is the most stable! I know nothing of Mr. Paul! Only that he maybe another Ross Perot in the end! When it comes down to the nitty asd well as the gritty I’m hoping all conservatives will vote for Newt Gingrich! He has his faults but none other than the best conservative for the President of the US period! Please let’s not have another 2008!

    • Steve

      Hey go to 12:41 and read his record. Then slap yourself!

  • Pastor Ruth

    Paul in NOT dangerous! He is the most independent thinker of the bunch with a proven track record. He is NOT however in the pockets of the BIG Bankers: the Rockefellers who own Citibank; the Rothschilds who own Bank of America; the Morgans who own Chase. Follow the money! The bankers own the corporations who buy the elections who enslave us and tell us what we can and can’t do. Paul is for cutting us loose! Getting rid of the FED that was created to bring us to default. They are a private organization – not run or overseen by anyone. They answer to no one, and Paul is right, they need to be shut down. America is the last standing tower of freedom that the One Worlders must topple! We can’t let that happen or the whole world will be enslaved. God is our only hope, but Ron Paul should be our only candidate. No one else is willing to talk about this, or to stand up to them. We MUST regain our sovereignty and our freedom, or we will be duped into handing control to someone who can be bought!

    • AlleyOops

      “With a proven track record” Can you please embellish on your statement?

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        He shouldn’t have to. If you had any clue what was going on you would know that Ron Paul has a perfect voting record. Ron Paul is consistent. He votes 100% for the constitution, every time. Lobbyists wont even approach him. He was nicknamed Dr. No for this very reason. He votes alone if he has to. He voted against the patriot act. He voted against the war in Iraq. He voted to go after the people who attacked us after 9/11. He has been saying the exact same things for over 30 years.

        If you had any clue what was going on, you would know this.

        Can any of the other candidates say the same thing about themselves?

        Nope.

        • AlleyOops

          My only clue is that Ron Paul is like a member of the 435 house member band…every time there’s a parade, Ron Paul is the only one out of step and you supporters of Paul whine and scream that the other 434 members are the ones out of step.

          • CJ

            They are out of step- if you knew anything about our history, you would know that.

          • Steve

            And you are a staunch supporter of a Congress with an approval rating that is headed for single digits??

            How many times in history has one voice stood up to speak the truth only to be harrassed by the narrow thinkers of the day who only follow what everyone else says to do?

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      PASTOR RUTH ?????? I WONDER !!!!!!

  • English Teacher

    Well, now the democrats can have fun with Ron Paul. That will give Gingrich a breather and let the people of Iowa see who they like so much. Note to Iowans: Don’t reelect Obama under any circumstances. Otherwise your entire state will be taken over and be charged with growing food. Sounds stupid doesn’t it? Watch out… It will happen! Ron Paul will satand by and watch it happen then scratch his head asking how could that happen.

  • dwayne

    Ron Paul read the IAEA report, google it and you will see he will defend USA against IRAN
    they get military nuclear power, but Iran does not have and don’t need another Iraq, Afghan. Unconstitutional war. Israel will beat us to Iran as she is #1 on the hit list. Paul said he does not want them to have nukes, you didn’t hear because prejudice? Report does not state she is up or ready for WMD! He will base war on FACT vs threats that will give us another war we will go if need be. He quoted Kennedy vs Cuba, again you didn’t hear? I sure hope you get your eyes and ears open to what our Constitution says and how we got to be on the edge of losing our sovereignty! None of us like his looks/oration but his WORDS are true and choosing a candidate that is not on same status quo taking the USA into a One World Gov’t. Google Agenda 21 here in 1200 US cities so far and we have been sold out by our gov’t and the UN! There won’t be a USA w/any sovereign power if you vote for a pretty face, vs Constitution he will get us to. United we stand.

  • RSMurray

    I don’t believe the article for a minute. Ron Paul is not a conservative or a Republican. Most of the sources his followers quote are liberal publications. His “foreign policy” is left of Obama! He would be just about as bad as having Obama in office another 4 years. I thought he said he was going to retire in 1012. AMERICA NEEDS NEWT 2012!

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Newt is a progressive. Talk about leaning to the left. Who are you trying to mislead?

      Besides, both the left and right support the same exact foreign policy.

      What a joke. Ron Paul is more conservative than all of the other candidates combined.

    • Steve

      Hey jackass go to 12:41 read his record then slap yourself!

    • What If

      What if, all of you self proclaimed political experts, would or could understand that the real true meaning (defintion) of “A liberal” because you may be surprised at what you find. Look it up yourself but, just for a primer, Fifty or maybe seventy five years ago “A liberal” was not a communist/marxist or progressive, but, was a constitutionalist with more emphasis on the social/civil liberties and less on the power of a central government. Sounds more like a libertarian than a communist/marxist/progressive democrat, does it not. A conservative was someone who believed in a central government, a strong military, a strong police at the local and state levels, and strong enforce of laws to prevent crime, and a strong judiaciary to met out punishment for those who break the law, government regulation to instill morality within the people (DEA, ATF, FCC, IRS, HUD, DOE,TSA, FBI, CIA, FHA, + thousands more including regulation of commerce. They did not emphazise too much on civil liberties (still don’t) SO where do YOU stand? Are you a conservative or a liberal, or perhaps a Libertarian, or a Fusionist.

  • Leon Berton

    Again, before shooting off one’s mouth about Paul, READ HIS POSITIONS on his website.

    Then, READ THE CONSTITUTION.

    • AlleyOops

      Why should I bother looking at what his staff puts on his web site….I’ve watched him on every debate and all he can do, with a very soprano pitched voice, is rant, rave and whine about very mundane things that don’t matter very much to the average voter.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Exactly. You watched the debates and that is all.

        The same debates that give Ron Paul the least time to speak.
        The same debates that Ron Paul was cut off during his speech.
        The same debates that Ron Paul wasn’t invited to?

        See, this is part of the problem. You get most of your info from the debates, where the questions are staged so they can make some candidates look bad and others look good. The mainstream media run debates where they give so much time to a few and only a few minutes to others.

        You guys are sheep being let to slaughter!
        Learn the truth, before it’s too late!
        http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/the-american-dream-a-true-story/

        • AlleyOops

          Unfortunately, you’re correct! The media has this silly idea of giving the floor to those candidates with some semblance of substance…It’s too bad that Ron Paul doesn’t measure up to that criteria.

      • What If

        AlleyOops:
        Did you learn your political views from the same comic strip where you got your pen name?

  • off plum

    You can’t stop Pauls message off freedom….

  • off plum

    Annie
    Supporting the constitution and bill of rights is extremist? ……maybe you should live in China ?

  • Lou

    I’d vote Ron Paul over Obama I’m going for Perry than Newt

  • Michael

    From a logical Michael to a delusional michael. If Ron Pauls foreign policy is a disgrace why don’t you offer any reason why it is. Could it be you don’t know and are repeating what your slave masters fox news and the neocons want you to say. If Iran hates the Jews so bad why do they have 25,000 jews in Iran. They have 24 mosques in Tehran and the Jewish people even have a seat in Irans Parliment. Youtube Jews in Iran and you will hear the Jewish leader in Iran tell you they are not Persecuted by the Iranian Government. This conflict between Iran and Isreal is a Gov. conflict not a Irainian people against Jewish peolple. Listen to what Netanyahu said to congress a few months ago. Isreal doesn’t need American nation building they can thake care of themselves. They don’t need or want American troops there. Get educated on what is going on in the world and stop being a puppet to the neocon cronycapitalists that control you.

    • Michael

      I offered several reasons why it is. You must know this also as you made an attempt to address one of these. Nobody in this field is promoting nation building. I am advocating a policy that dis not a head in the sand, ore 9/11 policy. I have not once stated anywhere that we need to occupy Iran or occupy Israel. I have stated repeatedly that we need to stand along side Israel and acknowledge the very real political/ideological threat to the nation of Israel – and be ready to offer assistance as needed.

      Not sure where you are getting your info from – but for starters – the Jews do not worship in mosque. They worship in synagogues. There are approximately 10,000 Jews in Iran. Iran is after the big prize – not a handful that are already under their thumb. They can tighten those screws there once they deal with the larger issue.

      You really need to be careful making assumptions that you are intellectually superior to those who disagree with your policies. I could give a rat’s tail if you disagree with mine…but I won’t allow you to put words in my mouth.

  • MAC

    Just for clarification, this is the Republican Iowa Caucus, right?
    We are talking about the same Ron Paul who said that he would like to have Dennis Kucinich in his cabinet for foreign policy advice?
    The same Ron Paul who essentially blamed the US for 9/11?
    The same Ron Paul who claims the troops overwhelmingly support him after he was the only House Republican to support open homosexuality in the military?
    We are talking about the same Ron Paul who recently offered an amendment to cut foreign aid to not everyone, but specifically to allies Israel, Pakistan and Egypt?
    The same Ron Paul who is perfectly fine with the legalization of heroine, while ignoring our massive problem of drug abuse of legal prescription drugs?
    The same Ron Paul who once said that he thought much of the gold at Fort Knox was gold spray painted lead bars, deserving a good counting?
    The same Ron Paul who puts earmarks in the budget then symbolically votes no, knowing that his earmarks will pass?
    If that is the Ron Paul we’re talking about then put me down as a Newt supporter. At least he actually accomplished cutting the size of government and other conservative things as a congressman. Ron Paul has done little more than create a legislative and political history of odd beliefs and a mishmash of followers who see in him only what they choose to see.

    • Michael

      Exactly MAC – that Ron Paul, the politically expedient.
      A conservative would not bring on board a lefty like Kucinich.
      A patriot would not continually blame America.
      Paul is weak on social issues – citing libertarian values. I’ll stick by my Christian values. Say no to the homosexual lobby and illicit drugs.
      Paul – the hypocrate on earmarks.

      This is the guy that just may win the Iowa Caucus.

    • What If

      Mac:
      1. Do actually know what Dennis Kucinich political views are or are you just relying on news clips or gossip?
      2. Who was responsible for Waco, where American citizens, women, men and children were slaughtered by your government?
      3. Check out those who have made donations to his campign and compare that, to what they donate to others. (read his own statement on his position regarding homosexuality)
      4.Read HIS position on the foreign aid issue, your statement is establishment propaganda.
      5. So you think the governments so called war on drugs has worked. Why then do we have a growing drug problem and a growing threat of war with Mexico because of the enormous violence associated with drugs.Ron Paul has consistently warned about the problems of legalized drug use “prescripts”, so please don’t repeat lies.
      6. Ron Paul was kidding about “lead bars painted gold” he knows there is no gold or lead in Fort Knox, but it sounds as though you beleive the gold is there. Question, do you also believe the social security trust fund money is there too?
      7. Do you actually know what a ear mark is? How about highway funds or medicaid payments to the states. Or do you think those funds come Obama’s stash?
      8. I think you should vote for Newt, you certainly do not qualify as a free thinker, and to be a Ron Paul supporter one has to be someone with the ability to THINK for themselves.

      • Michael

        Kucinich –
        pro-choice, likely out of political expediency since ’02.
        over-the top animal rights activist
        100% rating by the anti-Christian and un-American ACLU
        Supports alcohol for 18 year olds and voting for 16 year olds.
        Green energy supporter – along with CAP and Trade
        Supports universal education and tuition free higher education. Sound like lot of tax dollars out the window here.
        Health care is a right and national health care government option is the answer.

        Sounds like a big government liberal to me.

        The war on drugs – rather than legalize drugs let’s seal off the border. Controls on alcohol don’t work very well – so sure, lets add another. How many thousands are addicted to prescription drugs? The logic that it legalization for prescription doesn’t help the cause. It does nothing to address the violence you cite as a primary benefit – because the lion’s share of the market is not for medicinal purposes.

        Earmarks are huge issue and he did little besides to bolster my confidence that he would veto any piece of legislation that wasn’t loaded with pork. “All money should be earmarked” was the thrust of his response. Yes, it should…but it should be done so correctly. Not to buy votes from other members of congress. I’m sure Mr. Paul is all too familiar with the politics attached to the earmarks. That’s how the senate passed the health care monstrosity.

        As far as free thinking – some of you Paul folks taking lessons from the left on civility? That sort of commentary makes your candidate less credible.

  • John Acord

    Calling all Paul doubters. Face the reality. Paul is going to win the nomination. So lets all settle down and understand exactly what his positions on foreign affairs is, not what is presented by Bill O’Silly, Or Sean BSannnity, or the other warlocks at the coven known as Faux News. We are doing Israel no favor by continuously meddling in the ME. Ron Paul’s new video explains this clearly and comprehensively. You need to view this and distribute it to your contacts who have been confused by the MSW and the rampant Neocon propaganda machines.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/12/17/have-trouble-with-ron-pauls-foreign-policy/

    • AlleyOops

      As a real conservative, I find it difficult to understand why the Ron Paul supporters hate Fox News…..Fox is the only news network that even comes close to being fair and balanced…Do I believe everything that O’Reilly & Sean says or do I believe anything that comes out of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS….The answer is a resounding no….even Sean & Bill can’t always agree….Greta seems to be the great buffer between the two of them….Fox news, with all its’ faults is heads and shoulders above the one that comes in second place and the audience figures prove it.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        We hate all the media equally. They are all run by the same propaganda machine. All media support the federal reserve, the bailouts, the wars, the spending and they will fight anyone who challenges the status quo. It’s not only Fox news. Do you know how much time was given to Ron Paul during the debates? Compare that to what was given to the other candidates. They twist what Ron says to make him look bad. Why? Ron Paul is against the Federal Reserve banking system. The last person who went up against the Federal Reserve was Kennedy. They killed him for it.

        http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/the-american-dream-a-true-story/

        • AlleyOops

          So there is no form of communication that can please you short of the radical right propaganda espoused by the Paul campaign. That’s really sad but should show you good reason why Ron Paul doesn’t stand a snow ball’s chance in hell of getting elected POTUS.

          • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

            So you would rather have the media that is controlled by special interests and people who support the bailouts? Follow the money! Not everything is about right and left when the people controlling the financial system control both the right and the left. You have to look past the curtain and see who is running the show behind the scenes.

            Right = Left
            Both support Tarp
            Both support endless spending
            Both support endless wars

            http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/blame-bush-blame-obama-but-dont-look-behind-the-curtain/

  • Michael Ejercito

    Paul is what we need.

  • lunacyfighter

    Iowan’s Dumbed Down…Ron Paul is a Dangerous ranting Lunatic. It’s not about taking over other countries, IT IS ABOUT SAVING OUR NATION AND BEING ABLE TO PROTECT OUR NATION FROM ANY EVIL ENTITY THAT WISHES TO DESTROY THE GREAT U. S.. of A. If Ron Paul were to win the Presidency…we wouldn’t need a president because there will be No more USA. The rest of the states need to give Iowa a WAKE UP call. Have a truly Blessed & Merrry Christmas and pray, pray, pray that God leads all American’s to select the candidate that’s most capable of Restoring our country.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      I don’t think so. Why would you give up your liberties the forefathers fought so hard to protect and so many died for, so you can have a little bit of security? I know you are scared of the cave people, but strap on a set! Man, I never thought we would have so many cowards in my own country!

      Live free or die!
      Ron Paul 2012!

      Those who sacrifice liberty for temporary security deserve neither!

      How dare you talk this way about Iowans?!?! Screw you!

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        What’s is worth if we are not a free people? What is the point? Why not just take yourself to North Korea? If you are not worried about freedom and would rather be safe, go move to a communist country. America is all we, the people who want to live free, have left. So if you want to take away our freedom for a little temporary security, you are going to upset the rest of us who are not afraid of the men in caves. Screw the patriot act!

        For Liberty
        Ron Paul 2012!

        • Michael

          “Michael says:
          December 19, 2011 at 8:54 pm

          I don’t care WHAT they say. I’m just not into propaganda from those that are bent on the destruction of all that is not Islamic! All criminals claim to be victims in today’s culture and the left and the ACLU usually agree. Look – you claim to be a Christian but you refuse to face the truth. Dig a little deeper. Are you one of those “Christians” that doesn’t believe the Bible to be the inspired Word of God?”

          Again – after listening – the resentment is for WHO WE ARE. Not one of us was there in ’53. If you hold a grudge for 26 years on a people that had absolutely nothing to do with the incident. As a professed Christian – would you not call that an issue with forgiveness. I would also call it a cop out. If you are going to retaliate, you wouldn’t wait for 26 years. It sounds to me like what you would call establishment propaganda.

      • Michael

        Coward -you call it cowardace to have a set and stand up to Radical Islam? Let Paul wage his war in Congress where we don’t have to worry about the pre-911 madness that cost us thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars. Are the men and women of our armed forces standing up to these radicals bent on forcing sharia law on the world cowards?

        What you all don’t seem to acknowledge is that this is a global war versus an ideology. It is not going away because we choose to ignore it.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          See, the problem is that you don’t listen to the attackers. They are telling you why they attacked us, but you refuse to listen. You have your own ideas. You want a religious war so bad that you invent one in your mind. Even the CIA says that the attack was motivated by blowback. Your ideas trump the CIA intelligence and the attackers own explanation of their attack. We will just go with what you say because you know more than these CIA wackos!

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          This is why they attacked us:
          http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

          • Michael

            I don’t care WHAT they say. I’m just not into propaganda from those that are bent on the destruction of all that is not Islamic! All criminals claim to be victims in today’s culture and the left and the ACLU usually agree. Look – you claim to be a Christian but you refuse to face the truth. Dig a little deeper. Are you one of those “Christians” that doesn’t believe the Bible to be the inspired Word of God?

    • Steve

      Restoration of our country cannot, and will not, come in any other way but from the inside out. Paul is the only one who has the clearly articulated policies to start the internal transition to a stable financial, social, legal, and political footing.

      Further, restoration NEVER comes as a function of our ability to wage war on other nations. Why is it so difficult, even for people who claim they adhere to Constitutional principle, to view Paul’s policy of never going to war without a Congressional declaration as “fringe”. Our policy for the last half of the 20th century has been for Congress to avoid getting their hands dirty by ceding the power of waging war to the President. How has that worked for us so far?? If Congress declares war President Paul, the only military veteran in the current field, will be sure to swiftly execute it.

  • Windy

    All you anti-Paul people are playing right into the hands of the progressive big government globalists. If you cannot recognize that Paul is the only one who will turn this ship-of-state, back to Constitutional governance and that all the other candidates (including Obama) are clearly anti-Constitution and anti-freedom, you must be blinded and deafened to reality by the party hierarchy and MSM. Your ridiculous (media driven) anti-Paul position is going to be the downfall of our American experiment in freedom and self government. And don’t bother replying to me, as this week I am so busy getting ready for Christmas I won’t have time to read your stupid replies, let alone respond to them.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      WINDY THE FEELING IS MUTUAL…JUST KEEP DEALING WITH XMAS AS YOUR OPINION HAS NO BEARING & IS STUPID !!

  • David

    As a retired Air Force member of 22 years. Serving from 1973 until 1995…From S.E. Asia to Saudi Arabia. The SO CALLED conservative Presidents and Congress put the U.S. in VERY untennable positions with the “Big Speak – no Stick” foreign policy. Now, we have the “Apologenist-in-Chief” that surrenders our sovereignty to the U.N. via Hillary et al.
    It is NOT time to have an adult in the White House who actually READS the Constitution not a phoney “orgainzer/undocumented law professor”?
    Why should “We the People” settle for LESS than (Romney/Gingrinch the Dems WANT) Ron Paul … OR someone TRULY conservative.
    OBTW…Throw ALL the bums out and start fresh

  • Buck

    IWOANS , please support the only TRUE conservative in the race , your very own MICHELE BACHMANN !!!

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      SHE WILL GET CHEWED UP BY OBAMA…..PLEASSSSSSSSSSS !! SHE IS BEATABLE JUST LIKE RON PAUL….DO NOT LISTEN TO THESE LIBERALS, DEMOCRATS POSING AS REPUBLICANS… THAT IS WHO THEY WANT YOU TO VOTE FOR SO OBAMA WILL WIN AGAIN !! WISE UP !

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Who is your pick CAPS LOCK MAN?

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Bachmann is a compulsive liar. I am an Iowan. I would never vote for someone I can’t trust! Tell me this? Why does she have to lie every time she comes to Iowa? Why does she have to lie to gain support for her war in Iran?

      http://truthandculture.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/gop-debate-fact-checking-michele-bachmann/

      • WhoKnows

        Coming from someone who wouldn’t know truth if it crawled up his pant leg and bit off a chunk of ghoulie, anything not uttered by Little RiP must sound like a lie. I hope that Ron Paul Prayer Rug can double for a blanket ’cause I’m sure Momma’s basement gets cold in December.

  • msbets

    I guess you didn’t read the part, that damned near everyone, said they did have WMD’S, you must be a plant or a closet dummyrat.

  • Larry

    It is interesting to note that all of the Ron Paul supporters seem to think that everyone else needs to learn the meaning of Liberal vs. Libertarian. Well, while I admire some of Paul’s thinking the bottom line is that he is not electable. Look it up or maybe you can google it but that means he can not beat Obama. End of the story.

    • Pepper

      I hope you’re making a lot of money with your time machine invention. How else would you know whether anyone is electable?

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      LARRY, RIGHT ON !! I AGREE !!

  • Bill

    Many blacks and Latinos are leaning toward Romney. Let’s go wih a winner this time and forget these other wannabes! I am throwing my support, time, money and work to get Mitt Romney elected.

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      BILL, NOW YOU HAVE SOME BRAINS…. ROMNEY 2012 !!

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        ROMNEY IS A FLIP FLOPPER! ROMNEY HAS NO CORE VALUES! OBAMA WILL USE THIS AGAINST HIM! YOU MIGHT AS WELL REELECT OBAMA! THIS IS JUST LIKE MCCAIN IN ’08! ENJOY YOUR FOUR MORE YEARS WITH OBAMA! SUCKERS!

  • MAC

    As a Christian accountable for my vote, I simply cannot in good moral conscience vote for either Ron Paul or Barrack Obama. . . oddly (or sadly) for many of the same reasons. Neither have a clear moral view of right and wrong on social issues and Israel. Obama is morally wrong and Paul places his truly unique view of the constitution as a reason for excusing what God describes as morally wrong. (Our founders described them as moral wrongs too.) Unlike Paul, I do not believe that our founders created a constitution that placed legislators in a position of having to vote constitutionally correct, yet Biblically wrong. (Take a look at Ron Paul’s view of homosexuality, and decency matters, and contrast it with those of the founders, and founding era laws on those subjects for example. . . they couldn’t be more different.) By the way, I sometimes listen to Ron Paul and conclude that if he were in the first session of Congress and still talking like he does today, he would have to oppose the Bill of Rights because they tamper with the Constitution and should be left up to the states.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Ron Paul is not against amending the constitution. Ron Paul is for obeying the law, which is the constitution. Ron Paul wants the churches to handle marriage. What is wrong with that?

      I don’t think Ron Paul’s ideas are the problem. I think the problem is the misunderstanding of Ron Paul’s ideas. Most of Ron Paul’s core followers understand them. I found that most of the people commenting on conservative byte don’t have a very good understanding, if any. Most of these people get their news from 10 second sound bytes and from places like conservative byte which explains why they are so misguided and clueless when it comes to the facts.

      I hear stupid comments like “Ron Paul is a liberal” and “Ron Paul is not a conservative” and anyone who has been paying attention knows these are completely false.

      I know a lot of people are too lazy to do any research on their own aside from what the TV tells them or what they read on conservative byte, but I encourage them to take a look at Ron Paul’s views (from a reliable location) and see for themselves that they are being misled by the mainstream media. Ron Paul’s ideas can’t be explained in a ten second sound byte. It takes a little more to understand where he is coming from.

      Please click here and read for yourselves what Ron Paul really believes:
      http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/

      These all CAPS comments saying things like “YOU ARE A OBAMA HUGER” are ridiculous! It just shows the intelligence level of some voters. This is why we have people like McCain getting the nomination and people like Obama becoming president.

      • Michael

        I have watched guy debate for two election cycles. I know where he claims to stand. Dangerous foreign policy – directly from his lips. Social irresponsibility – again from his lips. He claims to believe that the Founders had Judeo-Christian values. We have a rule of law that protects the innocent from such things as drugs. How does legalization of drugs protect the children? Enforce the former criminal not to sell to those under 18? The federal government has a Constitutional mandate to protect its citizens from enemies both domestic and foreign. I guess the concept of “protection” is not one that Mr. Paul particularly embraces.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Federal decriminalization, not legalization. The people of the states are still in control. If you want to protect the innocent from things such as drugs, then why are you justifying locking up medical patients with valid prescriptions? Drug use is a sickness, such as alcoholism. Addiction is not a crime.

          How is the war on drugs good for families? Let’s face it, it’s not a war on drugs, it’s a war on people. It’s a war on families. People are using drugs today in the USA. How is this possible? We have laws! If people want to use drugs, they can and they will. You can’t stop them. If they are addicted to drugs, put them in the hospital. Get them help. Don’t lock them up away from their families.

          Police, drug dealers, and innocent bystanders are getting killed in this war on drugs. We could stop this. We could put the drug dealers out of business. We could end some gang activity. We could cut down the violence. The shootings. The robberies. We could let the states regulate marijuana.

          Let’s look at this logically. How many people has alcohol killed? Many How many people have pharmaceutical drugs killed? Many (Just watch the commercials: May cause death, disease, or permanent injury) How many people has marijuana killed? Not many if any.

          Drugs are bad. Using them is stupid. But what are we really doing to make people safer? We are causing more harm than good.

  • THOMAS STEWART

    Wake-Up Americans And Just Think Who Picked Our Last GOP Candidate MACAIN, Yikess, None Other Than The Democrats, Because That Was The Worst Candidate. God Bless America And The Tea Party Patriots, With Sarah Palin.

    • Herb

      There was not a Repubican in the universe that could have won the 2008. Romney was about even with McCain, then made his $1million donation to his campiagn and dropped out so he could save is powder for 2012. Palin is a super conservative but does her best work right where is. It may be better to make her chairperson of the RNC. McCain was just a pawn for the slaughter because we had to put up somebody, he had no chance and it is good he lost, because Obama has done more to motivate the conservative base since Reagan. They thought Palin wasjust a pawn too, but she actually gained traction and gave the campaign the life it had.
      True, we should not let the media pick our candidate but we must work together to pick a good one that can win.

  • Wayne

    I am with Ron Paul. Let Iran get nuclear weapons but if they try and use them on Israel or any other country they will get blown off the map. What is all the fuss about Iran getting a nuclear weapon. We have nuclear weapons so does Pakistan and Isreal. I like Ron Paul because he says for the USA to quit giving all of these other nations money. We need to mind our own business and stay out of every other countrys affair. If some other country wants to attack us then we have the capability to destroy them. I personally think that Iran has more sense than to use a nuclear weapon on Isreal because they know that they will be destroyed. I think that Ron Paul will get this country on the right track.

    • AlleyOops

      Will we have the luxury of deciding whom gets blown off the face of the earth first??? I think not.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Israel doesn’t want us there. Israel can defend herself. Don’t you guys listen to what Israel says?

      http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/for-the-record-ron-paul-and-israel/

  • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

    A LOT OF YOU PEOPLE THAT HAVE MADE COMMENTS FOR RON PAUL MAKES ME THINK YOU ARE A BUNCH OF LIBERALS …THE LIBERALS & DEMOCRATS WANT PAUL TO RUN AGAINST OBAMA BECAUSE THEY KNOW OBAMA WILL BEAT HIM TO A PULP !! THEY DO NOT WANT ROMNEY & GINGRICH BECAUSE THEY WILL BEAT OBAMA…WISE UP PEOPLE CAN’T YO SEE THE WRITING ON THE WALL ???

    • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

      OOPS, MISTAKE…”.YOU”, SORRY !

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      That makes no sense. Ron Paul is the ONLY conservative running for president. Ron Paul has a perfect voting record and has said the same thing for over 30 years.

      All the other candidates have closets full of skeletons. All the other candidates flip flop on important issues like abortion and TARP. Ron Paul is the only candidate who is against the bailouts. Ron Paul will mop the floor with Obama. Ron Paul is the only one who can beat Obama. Obama will use the other candidates past against them.

      By the way:
      Your caps lock is broken.

      • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

        JASON, MR KNOW IT ALL, THIS IS HOW I LIKE TO WRITE SO STUPID PEOPLE LIKE YOU CAN READ IT OR JUST MAYBE UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING BUT I GUESS YOU STILL DO NOT GET IT, A STUPID LIBERAL, DEMOCRAT!! BY THE WAY, RON PAUL FLIP FLOPS ALL THE TIME ,ALSO HE DOES NOT GET IT, HE HAS TO PAUSE SO MUCH TO THINK OF WHAT HE WANTS TO SAY & ACTS LIKE HE JUST DOES NOT REMEMBER WHAT HE JUST SAID !! GET A LIFE & GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT ABOUT RON PAUL, HE FAILED WHEN HE RAN BEFORE & WILL AGAIN…GOD BLESS AMERICA !!

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          Now I know you don’t have a clue. Ron Paul has never flip flopped. You make me laugh. I never thought I would argue with someone so clueless. YES IT IS MUCH EASIER TO READ WITHOUT PUNCTUATION AND PROPER SPELLING AND WITHOUT PROPER SENTENSES!!! I LIKE IT LIKE THIS SO I DONT CARE WHAT ANYONE THINKS ,BECAUSE I WILL LIE ABOUT A CANDIDATE SAY THINGS THAT ARE TOTALLY OPPOSITE OF THE TRUTH !! BECAUSE RON PAUL IS A FLIP FLOPPER AND HE LIKES PIGS AND FISH AND TURTLES BEAUSE THEY ARE FUN PETS AND THIS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE I SAID IT DID… GOD BLESS AMERICA

          • http://CONSERVATIVEBYTE SQUEAK

            MR. KNOW IT ALL AGAIN { JASON }, HERE I WILL MAKE YOU LAUGH AGAIN….RON PAUL HAS FLIP, FLOP ALL OVER THE PLACE SO DO NOT TELL YOUR UNTRUTHS… IF HE IS SO PERFECT LIKE YOU THINK WHY WASN’T HE ELECTED BEFORE ??? BECAUSE HE IS AN IDIOT LIKE YOU …CLUELESS !! THAT IS RIGHT, IF I WANT TO USE CAPITOL LETTERS , I WILL DO SO & I DO NOT NEED AN AIRHEAD LIKE YOU TO TELL ME OTHERWISE ! YOU JUST DO NOT MAKE ANY SENSE, WHAT DOES TURTLES, PIGS, FISH AS PETS GOT TO DO WITH ANY OF THIS ??? YOU & PAUL MAKE A GOOD COUPLE, BOTH HAVE HEAD PROBLEMS, JUST A LITTLE LOONEY ! GOD BLESS AMERICA

      • AlleyOops

        If you think John McCain was taken to the cleaners by the anointed one, Barack Obama, you haven seen anything yet compared to what Obama would do to the Csharp voiced Ron Paul.

  • Herb

    Alot of us would like to see the world Ron Paul has in mind. I don’t believe he is crazy or stupid or whatever , I just don’t believe he can deliver what he is trying to sell. Assuming Ron Paul were to get the nomination and even win the Oval Office. If the house and senate are not full of like minded people with a veto proof majority he will get nothing done. He will never close all those bases and he will never close all of the government agencies he plans to close. Nobody wants more war but I don’t think reducing our military is the answer. When I was in service the motto was “Peace Through Strength”. There are too many Liberals who think government entitlements are the answer. Most Conservatives do not believe that but that can of worms is already open and we will never be rid of it. Even if he were to win he will not be able to accomplish his goals. However his views on the Federal Reserve has merit, but he has a tough row to hoe there too.

    • Carol Fryer

      Are you saying you think the system as it is is so corrupt it will not change in spite of a good man at the helm. I also worry that it will kill him. But we can either start somewhere or just let the corruption flow. Evil triumphs when good men do nothing.

  • MAC

    Wayne, you need to find the clips on Iran from the Iowa debate on Saturday and listen to what Senator Rick Santorum said exactly about your (and Paul’s) point.
    The Iranian leaders who think like Ahmadinejad believe in what they call the rise of the 13th Imman who will reappear after they destroy Israel and martyr themselves. . . they do not care if we nuke them because martyrdom is one of their highest goals and part of their weird view of ultimate supremacy.
    Not every simple answer Ron Paul holds like this one you expressed (even though it sounds logical to us) fits into the reality of the world stage. . which is why Ron Paul’s foreign policy and some of his basic appeal is so dangerous.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      So you don’t like Ron Paul’s views on foreign policy? The troops do. You do you support? Santorum or the troops? Ron Paul gets more donations from active military personal (the troops) than all the other Republican candidates combined and more than Obama! So do you support the troops?

      http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/foreign-policy/

  • off plum

    Southerner….
    Saudi is also a place you can kill your wife in public, and if I remember it correctly most of the highjackers on 911 were from Saudi, yet we never invaded that country. Saudi is a American / United Kingdom puppet and as long as they take orders they are left alone. Most of Alqiada comes out of Saudi, so why invade everyone but them ? Not all of us are blind southerner, we can see the countries that do not do as the UN says are toppled and puppet dictators are put in place, our government no longer supports freedom , either abroad or at home.

  • off plum

    Southerner….
    Saudi is also a place you can kill your wife in public, and if I remember it correctly most of the highjackers on 911 were from Saudi, yet we never invaded that country. Saudi is a American / United Kingdom puppet and as long as they take orders they are left alone. Most of Alqiada comes out of Saudi, so why invade everyone but them ? Not all of us are blind southerner, we can see the countries that do not do as the UN says are toppled and puppet dictators are put in place, our government no longer supports freedom , either abroad or at home.

  • paul

    well, this is not a surprise. we should all vote for mickey mouse and Donald Duck,

  • Carol Fryer

    lol You just wont hear this on Fox News. They are busy singing praises to Newt , their war leader.

    • AlleyOops

      WOW!!!! please fill me in…..I listen to Fox evening news through Greta and I have not found anyone who has endorsed Newt or anyone else for that matter….It’s pretty obvious that O’Reilly leans toward Romney even though he has not formally given an endorsement.

  • david k.

    i still like newt,nowhere to go but up,people put to much on these first primaries,theres a long way to go.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Newt is a progressive.

  • C22

    Here is all the reasons to not have (Progressive) Gingrich as POTUS:
    http://www.jbs.org/birchtube/viewvideo/923/conspiracy/the-real-newt-gingrich–libertynewsnetwork
    Romney is just another Obama.
    Perry is too Mexican Liberal
    Santorum seemed ok except he falls into the war hawk trap.

  • mqg25

    It looks like Limbaugh, Hannity and the other neo-cons have conditioned the minds of those who believe they are “true conservatives” when in fact they are quasi-socialists or trotskyites. These faux commentators have you believing that these current wars are about freedom when the opposite is true. They love the police state mentality where they say your security is more important than your freedom. Don’t be fooled, they are paid well for a reason..to condition you for the New order. If you want to know what true conservatism is about ie; Barry Goldwater, I suggest you read what a Paleo-conservative philosophies are in lieu of Neo (new)-conservatism.

    • AlleyOops

      Barry Goldwater went to his grave as a liberal republican….Goldwater was known for many years as Mr. Conservative but old age, just like old age has gotten to Paul, did him in….he married a young chick less than half his age and became a liberal.

  • Kenny

    Ron Paul is a fruitcake who just happens to have the correct views on the Fed and fiscal responsibility. Sadly, he led many of you down a path of common sense regarding the Fed and fiscal matters, but then advances these wacko ideas on foreign policy. His performance in the last debate was abysmal and his foreign policy views are dangerously isolationist. Sure, we have to re-evaluate our commitments around the globe, but not along Paul’s lines, which would put our nation and the world in jeopardy. The world remains a dangerous place, particularly in light of the threat posed by radical Islam. Most Muslims are not violent, but most would like to see Sharia imposed on the world and will applaud the terrorists. Ron Paul does not understand this threat and gives credence to those who believe that the U.S. projection of power is the problem. Without the projection of U.S. power across the globe, dangerouis elements will fill the vacuum. On foreign policy, he might as well be Dennis Kucinich or some other tin foil hat type.

    • 57 girl

      I dare say Ron Paul is the only one that understands the perils of foreign intervention. You should look into our Nation’s past Military history (just the little clip linked below might open your eyes), and then come back and comment. The media has done an excellent job of brainwashing the masses using the fear factor. Do you really believe your statement . . . “Without the projection of U.S. power across the globe, dangerous elements will fill the vacuum.”? U.S. power across the globe is why we are almost bankrupt. Who won in Iraq and where are all of those WMD’s? I’ll tell you who won . . . the bankers and their bought off politicians, Dick Cheney and Halliburton, that’s who won. As for the WMD’s . . . I guess we are still looking for those, who knows?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo&feature=digest_thu

      • Michael

        Won’t even waste my time watching a Youtube video put together by God knows what or who. I need nothing besides my Bible, my common sense and a little unrevised history. Why don’t you highlight it for me? Blame American aggression for WWI, WWII, and the WW III that would be ultimate result of a foregn policy that has utter disregard for the realization that Islamic Extremists have declared war on the USA and have no intent of removing the target from our back regardless of our policy. We are at war with ideology – not a country.

        • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

          You refuse to listen to what the troops are saying. You would rather cross your arms and believe what you will without any facts to back it up. You don’t support our troops. You won’t even listen to them.

          No wonder we have Obama in office. Go ahead, pick another McCain. Enjoy four more years of Obama.

  • Kenny

    The Tea Party straw poll conducted yesterday of 23,000 participants gave Ron Paul 3%. On the enthusiam score, 64% of respondents gave him a score of “1″ meaning the least amount enthusiam. His ranking paralleled that of John Huntsman. Most Tea Partiers have come to the realization that he is a fruitcake who has ZERO chance of winning the nomination. What’s more, the American public will never vote for a 77-year-old for President. Paulbots–please move on to an electable candidate with a sensible foreign policy.

    • http://captelaine.blogspot.com CaptElaine

      But they REALLY, REALLY want Ron Paul, so they can all smoke pot together legally.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Stupid. I don’t do drugs. I support Ron Paul.

        • WhoKnows

          You SHOULD do drugs. Then you would have an excuse.

      • Bonnie

        CaptElaine, Do you know how many non-violent “drug” offenders are crowding our prisons? That is just one reason drugs should be legalized. BUT since you seem to be against this, then I suggest you quit smoking (if you do), drinking beer/wine/alcohol (if you do) because those are all legalized drugs. ;) Why do you think they legalized whiskey? Because the Mafia and bootleggers controlled the substance just as drug cartels control drugs today. Read history, dear. Please.

    • David

      maybe your right kenny – lets just move down the road to facism

  • Tiresofpropaganda

    Sheesh, you can tell all the idiots who cannot think for themselves by their parroting the idiotic mainstream media meme “Ron Paul is great except for his foreign policy” these idiots seem to believe that America will be safer when it is completely Fu$*ing bankrupt… Apparently these retards think it won’t be necessary to actually PAY for our troops and their supplies which is already nearly impossible. Apparently these mental midgets think that our economy isn’t vert important to our national security… Yep, Ron Paul has crazy foreign policy ideas… He actually puts America FIRST! Yep, even before *gasp* Israel! Yep, it’s a mystery why he gets 3 times as much in donations from ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY than all the other Obama’s COMBINED…

    • Michael

      Tiresofpropraganda – your use of he personal shows that like your candidate – you have already lost on the issue. Not to worry – his position is indefensible to a true conservative. Just like the libs – its a short sighted focus that has more to do with short term financial gain that it does with the reality of the global nature of Islamic terrorism. How costly was our flawed policy in the 90s? It led to two extremely costly wars – including the terrorist attack on our own shores.

      • Bonnie

        Why, Michael? Why did the terrorists attack our shores? Answer that simple question.

  • Exactomondo

    I read enough of the posts on this site to fgure out, the Site should be changed from “Conservative Byte” to “Communist manifesto.”
    There are either a lot of commies posing as conservatives or a lot of people who believe they are conservatives, but have no clue as what it means, politically.
    Have any of you “conservatives actually read ,the constitution, if so you certainly did not comprehend any thing you read.

    Ron Paul’s political philosophy is a nearly perfect fit with that of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Patrick Henry, and President George Washington. You would certainly know that if you actually believed in the Constitution , the founding fathers, the founding documents and understood what “A consitutional, free republic” truly means. It is obvious most of you don’t have a clue about the meaning of “America.”

  • http://captelaine.blogspot.com CaptElaine

    Sounds like the Democrats REALLY don’t want Newt… good enough… he’s got my vote.

    • 57 girl

      Please, please,please look at Newt’s voting record and money trail before you trot out to the poll’s to vote for him. Just because he is an elegant and composed speaker does not make him an honorable man. Go back and compare some of his speeches. He contradicts himself to suit his audience and his wallet.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Newt is basically a Democrat. He is a progressive. Have you looked at his record or do you just listen to the lies they say to get elected? The difference between a Ron Paul supporter and a Newt supporter… The Ron Paul supporter has looked at the candidate’s history. That is why we chose Ron Paul in the first place. This is also why we couldn’t ever be swayed into voting for someone else.

      Newt supports the bailouts. Fact: The tea party was formed as a protest against the bailouts.

      Newt is just like Obama. If you vote for someone that is just like Obama, I have to question if your motivation is skin color…

      If the Democrats support someone like Newt, it’s only because they want a white version of Obama in the White House.

  • 57 girl

    I invite any of you that think Ron Paul’s view on Foreign Policy is flawed to watch the clip linked below before coming to a ‘firm’ decision. It is an excellent history lesson beginning in 1953. That is when the troubles in the Middle East actually began. Too many people have died for no good reason. And many of our Government’s military actions are taken behind the people’s back. Then the media spins the stories to condone our murdering of thousands of civilians in their own homes. Not to mention, America is financially broke. We can not continue to spend trillions of dollars because our Government keeps chanting ‘terrorists’. I am sure the Nation’s we attack consider us to be the real terrorists.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo&feature=digest_thu

    • Bonnie

      Obviously the pseudo Conservatives on this board haven’t heard the latest. Now THEY are the terrorists according to our government. All but 7 senators voted to enact the latest act. Now Americans can be arrested without cause,without due process, have no rights to know why they are being detained, no rights to a lawyer and can be locked up in Guantanamo indefinitely without ever seeing a judge or lawyer. And we can thank sleeping sheep for this. Ron Paul people were contacting their representatives and senators over this legislation to prevent it crossing Obama’s desk to sign it into law. Were you?

      What have any of you done to deserve the freedoms you once had? Besides vote for all the progressive traitors that passed this unConstitutional bill? How did this happen? Well, our “wonderful” President Bush, just after the destruction of the Twin Towers, signed into law the infamous “Patriot Act”. You know, the one that was supposed to keep us all safe and secure. (When it was time to renew it- it would have expired- everyone now running for POTUS who was in a position to vote “No”, voted yes. There was one person who voted No, though. Guess-who?) When Bush was about to sign it, someone said, “But, Sir! this is unConstitutional!” What did he say? “Quit throwing this in my face! It’s just a g-d-damned piece of paper!” That was when I woke up to realize my party was a big part of the problem.

      I suspect 99% of you, maybe all of you didn’t even know this happened, did you? Well, every candidate on the stage of “Republican” progressive hopefuls, will do nothing about this if they are elected. There is only one person, one man who will try to reverse this “problem”. I think you know who I’m talking about. You’re fast-tracking to slavery and stampeding down the chute to your destruction. Most of you won’t even realize your freedoms are gone until they are LONG gone. Right now, you could all be supporting the only one who is determined to reverse this instead of bashing him. He is the only one who WANTS to preserve your freedoms and look how you treat him. That is why I say, “As long as you continue to fight the man who will save you and your liberties, you don’t deserve them…or him!”

  • The Truth

    Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum are the best Conservative choices.

    • 57 girl

      Why is that?

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Because a conservative byte commenter said. That is good enough for them.

  • engineersedge

    The John Birch society seem to believe in Ron Paul . I don’t know how far Right they are in this day? Sometimes too much of a good thing (RP), can be disastrous. I can abide some of the RP’s stand on some issues but most of them are too impractical. Rp could provide a useful purpose in a cabinet position but that’s all. A true leader in order to beat Obuma must have the experience , be p0litically astute, shown to be a true Conservative by voting for Conservative principals as shown by his record in Congress. This man is Newt ! The Obama machine fear him the most. Why else have they tried to dig up lies and dirt as much as they have? He is the only candidate that has not attacked the other candidates, ala Reagan !

    • Sumerian Man

      What’s impractical is what’s happing now. If we elect a just another flip flop RINO like Rommney or Perry or flip flop, pay to play conservative like Ginrich, we may just as well let the demorats have the presidency again because it will just remain “business as usual”. It’s way too late to just go on a healthy diet, this country must learn to live on a corrective diet if we are to save the whole body and soul of this great nation. Ron Paul is the only canidate with the right diet and the will to stick to it! Vote Ron Paul to save this nation as we love it!

    • 57 girl

      As far as Newt goes, I really don’t think it is that difficult to ‘dig up dirt’. The man’s past records speak for themselves. Newt would trade our Nation for a dollar in his pocket. He sure didn’t mind taking $1.6 + Million dollars from Freddie Mac right before the hammer dropped on the housing market.

      Now on to the next topic and I quote . . . “Rp could provide a useful purpose in a cabinet position but that’s all. A true leader in order to beat Obuma must have the experience , be p0litically astute, shown to be a true Conservative by voting for Conservative principals as shown by his record in Congress.” . . . 1.) Ron Paul has 30 years experience in Politics so how much more experience do you need? 2.) be politically astute . . . I dare say, there are few that could beat him in is knowledge of our Constitution, and/or our Nation’s history, especially as it applies to Foreign affairs. 3.) and Conservative principals . . . please, the man has never voted against our Constitution in any vote he’s ever made on the floor of Congress. By all means check out his background completely. I daresay, he has the cleanest voting record on record. And no matter how hard one tries, I wish them luck in finding any dirt on the man. You have got to have skeletons in your closet to have them exposed, which is why Newt should worry and Ron Paul doesn’t have to.

      • AlleyOops

        I’ve had the same amount of flying time that Ron Paul has in serving his country as a congressman from TX….Of course that doesn’t mean that I can fly a 747….Paul’s had the exposure with no appreciative legislation being passed by him to show for it.

        • 57 girl

          You know Alley, it is almost fun watching some of you guys try to downgrade Ron Paul. Here’s an idea . . . why don’t you hop over to YouTube and check out some of his floor speeches from years past, or recently for that matter. Listen to him. You might actually find out, he is consistent, he is knowledgeable, he is honest, and had we listened to him years ago, we could have diverted the housing bubble altogether. We also never would have invaded Iraq, therefore we would have saved thousands of Military Lives, and hundreds of thousands in civilian life, not to mention almost $1 Trillion in war spending bombing and rebuilding Iraqi cities. Here, let me point you in the right direction.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo&feature=digest_thu

          Just please watch the entire clip, then come back and tell me that Ron Paul has no foresight or experience. These speeches were made years ago and at the time were predictions due to typical ‘big Government’ actions. Those predictions have come to fruition. It is almost scary.

    • What If

      So you found the kool aid ? THINK, why would Obama, the socialist/democrats, the progressives like Nancy Pelosi, the UN, the Unions, or any communist linked groups fear Newt Gingrich. For over thirty years he advocated for a mandated universal health care system(Obama care on steroids), Newt was for (still is) advocating cap and trade and global warming, gun control, amnesty for illegals, Corp. bailouts, helped push through the original legislation, to force loans be made to those who could not pay back their morgages (still does), a huge advocate for the patriot actand the recent NDAA bill that permits the federal government to arrest and send to prison ANY AMERICAN, without a warrant or hearing or a judge or a trial, for natural life without benfit of legal council. If you want Newt, then you want a dictator style government, and not a free republic. Of course Newt is not much different than the rest of the GOP or democrat communist. You so called conservatives scare the hell out of me, not Ron Paul. Seems like all of you conservatives are anxious to become servants unto the masters of the plantation. (Plantation being the United States)

    • Bonnie

      Here is the record of your politically astute candidate, engineersedge:

      Newt knows how to talk like a conservative in election cycles. Like Obama, he knows how to cater to his constituency.
      But when the chips are down, here is how he has behaved:

      Quote:
      In 1995 Newt Gingrich made a dispassionate appeal in the well of the US House of Representatives to increase the power of the Presidency by repealing the War Powers Act. After voting for $1.2 billion dollars in 1994 to fund increased NATO peace keeping missions, the very next year he urged President Clinton to expand the US military presence in Bosnia [SUPPORING MUSLIMS AGAINST CHRISTIANS--DON]! Newt has been pro abortion, pro amnesty for illegal aliens, in support of higher taxes at one time or another, and in favor of expanding the role of the Federal government! He is viewed as being anti‑family by many, not only because of his pro choice stance on abortion, but also for his support of gay marriage, and because he has twice divorced and been married three different times. Actions speak louder than words!

      Quote:
      Newt Gingrich has been a member of the ‘progressive’ Council on Foreign Relations since 1990. This NGO, founded in 1921, and bankrolled with BIG MONEY from the Rockefeller Foundation and J. P. Morgan among other internationalists, has been dedicated since its inception to dismantling American sovereignty, de‑constructing our Constitution and our Bill of Rights, and promoting the idea of One World Government!

      http://www.lessgovisthebestgov.com/Newt-Gingrich-Candidate-President-Republican-Primary.html

      This is just a drop in the bucket. I’ll find the one with the real guts shortly. ;)

      • Bonnie

        Newt Gingrich

        For those who are seriously thinking of voting for Newt, you should really look hard at his previous actions. Here are just some to start:

        04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine (anti 1st Amendment legislation).
        10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
        11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
        11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
        01/06/1996 – He himself conceived a secret CIA mission to topple the Iranian leadership.
        04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion).
        06/–/1995 – He wrote the foreword to a book about tearing down the U.S. Constitution and implementing a Fascist World Government.
        06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionalist Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
        09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
        01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
        11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
        11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to.
        04/04/2007 – He says that there should be a clear distinction about what weapons should be reserved for only for the military.
        04/17/2008 – Made a commercial with Nancy Pelosi on Climate Change.
        09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
        10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
        12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
        03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
        07/30/2010 – Says that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
        08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
        11/15/2010 – He defended Romney-care; blamed liberals.
        12/02/2010 – He advocates a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens.
        12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
        01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
        01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
        02/10/2011 – He wants to replace the EPA instead of abolishing it.
        02/02/2011 – He says we are “losing the War on Terror”; the conflict will be as long as the Cold War.
        02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
        03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
        03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
        03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability).
        03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
        03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
        04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
        05/11/2011 – His campaign video said that he wants to “find solutions together, and insist on imposing those solutions on those who do not want to change.”
        05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
        05/15/2011 – Said GOP’s plan to cut back Medicare was “too big a jump.”
        05/15/2011 – He backed Obama’s individual mandate; “All of us have a responsibility to help pay for health care.”
        05/16/2011 – He also endorsed individual mandates in 1993 when Clinton pushed Universal Health Care.
        05/17/2011 – He has an outstanding debt to Tiffany’s Jewelry of between $250K – $500K.
        06/09/2011 – His own campaign staff resigned en masse.
        07/15/2011 – His poorly managed campaign is over $1 Million in debt.
        08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.
        08/11/2011 – His recent criticism of the United Nations is United Nations by a long, long history of supporting it.
        09/27/2011 – He says that he “helped develop the model for Homeland Security”.

  • Michael

    mqg25 – the Christian that doesn’t support Israel is disobedient. One would be correct to wonder how seriously they take their faith if they stand beside them. See Genesis 12:3. We’ve already booted God out of our schools with our progressive and flawed activist interpretation of the First Amendment. Shall we now separate ourselves further from His blessing? Shall we allow a friend surrounded by a people that call for her destruction to go it alone? Would you take the same approach if one of friends or family members were threated repeatedly by a group of neighborhood bullies? These bullies already hurl bombs continually across the border. What if your neghbor did the same thing to your home and your buddies refused to get involved?

    • 57 girl

      I think with 300 nuclear bombs in their arsenal, Israel can take care of themselves.

      • Michael

        It doesn’t matter what you think. I prefer to do as I know is right. We defend Israel at all costs.

        • 57 girl

          It is morons like you that keep America broke. We’re footing the bill to police 130 Nations. That’s why our Military budget is astronomical and theirs aren’t. Why don’t you sign up for the Military and go fight for Israel if you are that worried about their safety?

        • Bonnie
    • What If

      Michael” So being a christian like yourself, quoting gospel from the good book are of the opinion that Ron Paul is NOT A Christian, because he doesn’t believe we should bomb, kill, blow to smithareens, women, men and children all over the middle east or meddle in the sovereign business between Israel and it’s neighbors. I think history would show that we (America) have been doing all of those things for about 60 years. My question is, how has that worked out for everuyone in the middle east, including Israel and America.
      Lets consider your statement about someone hurling bombs into your country, just what do propose to do about the bullets being fired into America from Mexico. Are you saying we should blow up Mexico? Thats quite a religion believe you are espousing. I don’t think we have the same bible.

  • Kenny

    My brother supports Ron Paul. He likes him because he is sympathetic to the 9/11 truthers,
    is an isolationist, wants to withdraw American forces from around the world, is NOT a friend of Israel, and minimizes the Islamic threat. My brother also believes the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” is a real document, and thinks the end of the world is coming on December 21, 2012 according to the Mayan calendar. In 2007-2008, he supported Dennis “Tin Foil Hat” Kucinich. He is a willing victim of the conspiracy theories floating around the Internet.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Ron Paul is the only friend Israel has:
      http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/for-the-record-ron-paul-and-israel/

      Actions speak louder than words!

    • What If

      Sounds like you have a very smart and astute brother, and is capable of independent thought. Are you really sure you are brothers?

      • Bonnie

        Touche’ !!

  • Dallas

    For all who say: “There were no WMD’s found in Iraq”, seem to miss some facts. There were “Chemical Training Camps” in Northern Iraq (fact). Also, the Iraqis were given THREE WEEKS (3) “to come clean” (fact! a pretty big window), photos were taken of convoys of equipment crossing the border into Syria (fact). Plenty of time to move WMD’s out of the country. Colin Powell displayed before and after photo’s to the U N showing equipment having been moved. (fact) Keep in mind, Iraq had been at war with Iran for a significant period of time and had developed highly MOBIL WEAPONRY. (fact)

    Also, Terrorists have used the tactic when “up against it”, to ask for a three day truce, then disappear across a border, twice with regards to Bin Laden.
    Open your eyes and pay attention!

    • 57 girl

      Too bad our forces didn’t look in Pakistan for Bin Laden like Ron Paul suggested from day one, isn’t it? By the way, since you are the fountain of knowledge, why don’t you tell us where Saddam got his weapons?

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        People from Pakistan attack us… hey, I have an Idea! Let’s go to Iraq!

      • Michael

        Stating the obvious does not make Paul a foreign policy expert. He isn’t the only one that made the suggestion.

        • 57 girl

          Ron Paul was one of the few that tried to keep us out of Iraq, Micheal. Want to see something really scary? Watch this. . . I suggest you watch the entire video . . . there are a couple of really freaky predictions here and they have come to fruition. This video was made based on floor speeches that are 7 or 8 years old. It deals with both Iraq and Freddie/Fannie.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48Gfzgxh3ZQ&feature=related

      • AlleyOops

        Are you the Heinz variety….just asking……:)

  • Bill Baskett

    Maybe, just maybe some of you will start listening to Ron Paul. When he says something you do not like you seem to stop listening. Afterwards he said if war is needed, go to war, win it and come home. We have not, to my memory declared war since WWII. Where we send our military for a so called war is a death trap for our military. The powers to be do not want us to win, just make the President and the House look good and keep killing and wounding our great military men and women. At times they are afraid to shoot the enemy for fear of a court martial.

    If our military are required to fight a war, then declare war and turn them loose, they will win it and come home. At least this sounds good. Have a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year, God Bless America.

  • Jim

    Ron Paul would be a diaster for this country and its hard to believe that people would actly vote for him, but than again, there are idiots out there that support Obama.

    • What If

      Sounds like you know quite a lot about what it takes to be “A great president and leader of a constituionally free republic that is, for the people, by the people and of the people” so name as many as you can from either party from the day of our founding until now. The clock is ticking, ticking, ticking………..

  • Sumerian Man

    Ron Paul is the last hope for the survival of this country as we know it and appreciate it! Like it or not, like him or not.

  • Tom T

    To jason burns and all the other blinded that support libertarian, head in the sand ron paul . This man is as dangerous where our security is concerned as oboma. Those that keep harping on weapons of mass destruction did you see the pictures of the dead Kurds killed by the nerve gas? A weapon of mass destruction!! Did You see or read about the stock pile of drums full of pestiside, this stuff is used to make nerve gas. Did you ever wonder what happened to the captured iraq general that said they moved weapons into syria 9 days before they allowed or the phoney inspectors finally went in and inspected. I wonder if the dimwitted have considered all the possibilities, if in fact all of you are actually Americans that post some of this stupidity or maybe with this computerized world you are in fact imposters attempting to influnce what happens in this country. The way some of you rationalize things it appears you would have to be an out and out enemy.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Solution: Bomb the whole world. This way you eliminate all possible future threats. Why wait to see if they are innocent or guilty. Bomb them all! This way there is NO chance of anyone of them doing anything wrong. In fact, why don’t we just kill everyone on this miserable planet, just in case someone has a bad thought. If there are no people left on this planet, we can’t possibly have any violence.

      This thought pattern is a disease! You are sick. You need help. You cannot kill the innocent to prevent an event that hasn’t even happened against people who are not proven guilty. (Time Cop)

      Maybe we should have thought police. If you look like you are thinking bad thoughts, we kill you. Sound like a good idea to you?

      • Michael

        Again – maybe you better consult the Scriptures. For a Christian, Bible prophecy and its fulfillment seem to have little value in your world. Will you be among those calling out Lord, Lord to deaf ears. Abandon Israel iun your heart and find out.

    • David

      Dupes like you and some of the rest that have posted, always believe everything the government tells them! Every crisis they invent when they need support and to make Americans fear for their safety so they can take a few more of our liberties away! If the U.S. would mind it’s own business and take care of things at home, we would not have the terrorists attacking us and we would not be in the financial trouble we are in. why don’t you start acting like “We The People” instead of “We The Sheeple”.

    • What If

      Tom T;
      Are you sure you are who you say you are? If you are , how can we be sure that you are. I am inclined to think you are either “Doctor Strange Love” a mad scientist who loved to blow up people, with nuclear bombs. Or perhaps you are really the guy that portrayed Dr, Strange Love, Peter Sellers, a comedien, who loved to play the fool.

      Just call me a crazy conspiracy theorarist!

  • Bon

    OMG No one in their right mind would ever consider ron paul , he is a complete idiot.

    • 57 girl

      And exactly, why is that? I’d love to hear your reasons for your opinion.

  • http://N/A Scot

    Paul seems “loony” to some people because every decision he makes is based on the original Constitution, and that is foreign to most. We haven’t seen a politician follow the Constitution since our first few Presidents, and that is sad. Paul will rid us of the corrupt Federal agencies that suck our money from our wallets and control our lives, and that’s enough for me. Gingrich and Romney are progressives that will continue us down the same destructive path as Obama. The only other true Conservative choice is Bachman. By the way, Obama is so unpopular right now, and is also being investigated for voter fraud and other scandals, so as long as everyone gets out of votes and watches out for cheating liberals, Obama has no chance to win. A rock could beat Obama, so please stop saying Paul can’t win! It’s not true!

    • Michael

      Obama’s billion dollars and the MSM in his back pocket says otherwise.

  • TeaParty2012

    People better start waking up…. Ron Paul will kill the GOP. How are people voting for this guy? I see more countries attacking us like 911. He’s too soft he won’t retaliate. People will attack us and he will take them to dinner and ask them not to do it again. God I’m going to be pissed if the hippies elect this guy!

    • RioSam

      Maybe in the beginning you will be, as you say, pissed..but in the long run you will be happier and better off!

      Scroll down and take a look at the TEC Report. TEC = THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

      RON PAUL 2012

  • Bud MacGuire

    Ron Paul’s biggest weakness is his abandoment of the defence/financial support of Israel, which will cost him the support of the very powerful Israeli lobby.
    His biggest advantage is his very well detailed plan for the rescue of America’s desperate finacial conditon, which has been brought about by the US’s constant support of wars in the Middle East.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Ron Paul is the ONLY one who supports Israel.

      http://r3voluti0n.com/2011/for-the-record-ron-paul-and-israel/

    • Sumerian Man

      Isreal can easily support itself as long as we cut off our support to the rest of the fricking Middle East and their oil, we got plenty of our own – if only it wasn’t illegal to drill it! Another federal department thankfully on the Ron Paul hit list.

      • Michael

        When are you all going to get tit through your heads this has nothing to do with oil? It has nothing do with any form of treasure. It has everything to do with the ideology of radical Islam. The goal is destruction – PERIOD. It is not destruction IF certain conditions are not met.

    • AlleyOops

      Unfortunate as it may seem, for what ever reason, the democrats always garner more than their fair share of the Jewish vote.

  • http://ConsernitiveBiteJ Faith

    LOL, poor delusioned Iowa..my moms from there as Liberal and ready to vote for any radical that crosses the pike…I know Pauls a Progressive Liberitarian in GOP disguise..who’s also an Anti Semite – who appeals to radicals…

  • Marlene

    MSM is now putting Ron Paul in the limelight. Since the debates began, they have hi-lighted each candidate and will continue to do so until they’ve put them all in the spotlight and, then, cruelly eliminated them according to their whims. We’re not really given a choice in this selection process because the MSM is doing all the selecting and methodically destroying every candidate with first, their ‘pro’ campaign, then their ‘anti’ campaign. We, with all of our arguing, are merely dupes for the MSM who are working very hard to eliminate all competition for Obama. Who will they tout next? Probably Santorum, since they’ve not played him up or down so far. They publicized the Cain ‘scandals’ which were most likely a figment of their imaginations and wallets and trampled a very desireable candidate because he actually posed the greatest threat to Obama. He had economic sense and experience, management experience, more documented education than Obama and – he was definitely, no debate about it, a true black man. Obama was a black man in his own mind because he denied his mother’s white blood – it wasn’t PC enough. My point is that these debates and caucuses aren’t really proving anything because everything is manipulated by the media. And, we all know who they’re rooting for.

    • AlleyOops

      Lots of nice points and well presented.

  • http://ConservativeByte.com Don

    Who is the flavor of next month ?…..Is this gonna come down to a third party candidant ? Trump was belittled as a ‘birther’, but he also had some good ideas. Maybe America should give him another look, if given the chance.

  • David

    Jet fuel doesnt melt steel. Nor would 2 of the strongest buildings in the world fall from a plane crash. Wake up and quit using 9/11 like it could have actually been as the news told u it was. With a system like NORAD those planes would never have made it off course nearly as long as they did unless someone wanted them to. I dont agree 100% with Ron Paul but I DO agree we arent the police of the world. Look around you… TSA doing NAZI style screenings at airports… Military policing us on American soil…in direct defiance of Posse Comitatus… If they wanted to kill our freedoms as fox news says…then theyve won. Ron Paul is the best chance we have at the America envisioned by the founding fathers. Do some research into those ”Terrorist attacks”…REAL research… You’ll find more lies than a kid with cookie crumbs all over their face could deliver in a week of trying.

  • Cameron

    Will all you pro war, kill the muslims please tell me how we are going to pay for this. We are bankrupt. If you are so scared of them wanting to kill us how come I dont see all of you enlisting in the military?

  • David

    So, the only candidate in the field that absolutely follows the Constitution is a complete idiot! Sounds like to me the only idiots are those who don’t know the Constitution and therefore, refuse to support the only candidate that abides by his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution! A message for all you RINO’s out there. If you don’t support the Constitution, Ron Paul supporters won’t support another RINO this election cycle. We are tired of being expected to support whatever RINO you all decide to support in order to keep the democrats from winning! We will write in our votes for Ron Paul, which will effectively keep your RINO out of office and give Obama another four years! The ball is in your court! Either support the Constitution and Ron Paul or give Obama another four years!!!

    • AlleyOops

      Your theory about 9/11 is about as absurb as anyone could imagine and is ample reason not to back Ron Paul for POTUS….You supporters of Paul say you’re for term limits….how could that possibly be when you want to nominate a government kook who has been slopping at the government trough for over 40 years…Geesh

      • Michael

        Yeah – one thing I commend Rick Perry for is cutting congress down to a part time gig. Enough of yuckity-yucks making a profession of it, then claiming not be an insider. What a joke.

  • off plum

    The neocons on this blog amaze me , supporting big government and endless wars ….. we are in trouble.

    • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

      Yes we are!

  • 57 girl

    Elizabeth says:
    December 19, 2011 at 11:51 am

    Dr. Paul says one thing and believes another.
    The article I read about a week ago on him said that he hated blacks and muslims.
    Why on earth would we try to put someone in that COULD NOT beat the current failure?
    ********************
    Elizabeth, with all due respect, could you please provide an example (any example) of Ron Paul saying one thing, and contradicting himself, either through action or word? He’s been around for 30 years, and I have yet to see two clips by him that contradict each other. Maybe I missed something. The article you read a week ago probably was in reference to the statement that Ron Paul made in reference to Michelle Bachmann. I think she is the one going after the Muslims. As far as the blacks go, Ron Paul is probably their best bet at ever seeing equality through our court systems. You might want to go to Ron Paul’s website ronpaul2012.com and check him out directly. You are getting tainted information, Dear.

  • ruby mcbride

    Ron Paul scares the crap out of me with his radical foreign policies. We can not isolate ourselves from the world like he wants us to do. Does he want a cold war with the entire world?

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    Disregard all polls & pundits, rhetoric and sentimental appeals.

    Do you own research without bias and prejudice.

    Examine the voting records of each candidate.

    Take time to carefully examine the reasoning for their positions.

    Measure their actions in view of our Constitution which they are charged with upholding.

    Make your own difficult decision based on facts and reason.

  • http://conservativebyte.com Darkcloud

    Iowa go ahead and shake the Republicrat establishment to it’s core and vote for Paul. Maybe this will wake all the so called conservatives up and then as they go scurrying into the night with genuine fear in their hearts maybe they too will begin to talk conservative/constitutional and before the primary season is done they will actually stand up to the usurper and bring forth a new constitutional mindset in D.C. Candidates need to go on the Michael Savage show and get some real questions.

  • geordie

    UNCLE RON????? Oh my..He wants to CUT our Military..His Foriengn policies are no better then Odumbos..That dude is ready to Keal over any second and we need him?? Well will just have to see bout that folks.

  • Sumerian Man

    Jason Burns, thank you for taking the time to try to inform these readers of Mr. Paul’s ideology. I don’t have that kind of patience, and it seems your right on. One point I would like to make though is most people don’t understand the difference between a Democracy and a Republic, and the United States of America was created as a Republic. To those people I would offer this simple explanation as I understand it – A republic is an organization formed with the rights of the individual pinged as it’s basic tenet or rule, whereas a democracy impinges it’s rule on the rights of the majority or group. The problems with either are obvious, which is why this country employs both, a Republic that honors and upholds the rights of the individual, but uses a Democratic process to do so. It has worked well for over two hundred years up until the time the courts, beckoned by big money and government gone awry, started forgetting about the rights of the individual, and the Constitution that guarantees them, and this is the entire idea behind restoring the Constitution and electing Ron Paul as it’s champion. Without him and his understanding of the Constitution and federal governments role in upholding it’s rule of supreme law, we and this country we love are lost. Vote Ron Paul or kiss yours and your families freedoms goodbye!

    • Sumerian Man

      Please forgive any (grammer) spelling errors, thanks.

      • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

        Thanks Sumerian Man. You are a true patriot!

      • AlleyOops

        Could you please be more specific and tell us what part of the constitution needs to be ‘restored’? Thanks

        • Sumerian Man

          Man, you are a real fricking idiot aren’t you? Just guessing from your moniker the only thing you ever read were the funny pages. Put your hands between your knees, grab both ears and pull, then look around you and fall down and cry when you realize almost all your God given, Constitutional, personal rights and freedoms have all but vanished since even before 9\11! You and your family (if you even had the pri-mordial instinct to create one) have been sold out to proctect those who have put us in this life or death of America situation to begin with. It is almost impossible believe anyone who can read or write doesn’t know or can’t see what’s happening in the world around them and especially at home. You must be a product of the public school system in Chicago. God help you, cause your surely not smart enough to help yourself.

        • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

          Ever heard of the Patriot Act?

  • cleareyes

    Now I know this site is infected with a dumb RAT.
    Thats not where my reply should have been posted!!!

  • Another Veteran

    Gee, I hate to see Gingrich collapse, I thought he was in better health. Wouldn’t it be better to say, “Gingrich drops in polls.” The title of this post is a bait and switch.

  • honeybee

    Ron Paul is a dangerously deluded individual. What is so troublesome and just outright frightening is that he is all over everywhere speaking and recruiting support. Who are his supporters? What rock do they live under? Placing your hands over your eyes just keeps you from seeing something, but Paul’s supporters seem to have their eyes wide open and are still supporting him. That man would destroy the remainder of the country that Obama hasn’t gotten to yet. To those supporters of Ron Paul out there, please, please rethink your support for Mr. Paul. He may be a fine person, but he is seriously misjudging threats like Iran and oversimplifying his positions on monetary issues. American cannot afford four more years of Obama, but neither can we afford four years of Ron Paul.

    • David

      Honeybee! Educate yourself and read the Constitution and become a part of “We The People” instead of “We The Sheeple”.

      • Michael

        Which part of Section 1 Article 8 would you claim is being violated by our current foreign policy – with the exception of Obama’s little escapade into Libya? I say that Mr. Paul and his backers need to re-examine the first point below. Iraq’s gamesmanship with the UN weapons inspectors would certainly seem to fit the mold – as would Iran’s recent effort to smoke the Saudi ambassador. Let’s consult the Constitution to find the authority – shall we?

        Article 1 Section 8 – US Constitution
        To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

        To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

        To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

        To provide and maintain a Navy;

        To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

        To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

        • Steve

          You may be right if there were WMD’S But it was all a con to get your support to invade Iraq. So what was the threat to the US…

        • What If

          Michael: So when exactly did the congress “declare war” on any country and how many countries have we attacked with our military without war actually being declared. How many international laws and treaties have we broken by attacking countries with proclaiming a state of war existed before our taking either military action or acts of aggression?
          How can you use the “Laws of Nations” as a reason for attacking a sovereign nation when that nation’s government has not declared war on the United States or committed (proven) acts of war against the United States or it’s people.

          You made a point of including the following,
          “To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations”;

          So what exactly has our congress or president done to eliminate the acts of piracy being committed by the Somali’s and other African countries, And what does that clause have to do with Irag, Aftganistan. Libya, Syria, Egypt. Iran or perhaps even, Great Britain, Italy, Spain or Brazil. Answer has to be: absolutely nothing.
          Using your premise, there was absolutely nothing wrong with Japan attacking Pearl Harbor, or Germany invading Poland, or France, or China and North Korea invading South Korea.
          If we were to follow your interpretation of our Constitution, we would currently be at war with Mexico, with boots on the ground, drones and B52′s dropping bombs on Mexico City, Acapulco, and Vera Cruz, because the drug cartels have been invading, shooting and killing American citizens and have violated our international border.
          Our government declared “A War On Drugs” decades ago, and how many countries have we invaded, occupied and bombed because of that. G.W Bush declared a war on terrorist, but, neither he, nor Congress passed a resolution stating such a war. Why? Because the terrorist are not a country but, a militia made up of a bunch of criminals from many countries. Lydon Johnson declared a war on poverty, but, we didn’t go out and start bombing or shooting the poor people, (yet).

  • http://www.r3voluti0n.com/ Jason Burns

    Newt Gingrich’s record.
    1. 1978 voted for Dept of education and won 210 to 206
    2. voted to give 600 million acres to the fed gov ( Alaska)
    3. 1980 voted for china to get most favored Nation
    4.Voted for tax payer subsidized to the Soviet union
    5.Voted to transfer 2.2 mil acres of land from Idaho to the fed
    6.Started and voted to have Federally funded loan Guarantees.
    7.voted for taxpayer funds available to foreigh governments export import banks
    8.Amnesty to illegal immigrants
    9.Voted for foreign aid
    10.1994 funding for national endowment for the arts
    11.1994 voted for extra 1.2 bill for unpeacekeping
    12.13 billion in foreign aid 1994
    13.166 million to the IRS 1994
    14.31.8 billion in foregn aid 1995
    15.1995 Voted against cutting foreign aid 1%
    16,Time Mag Man of the Year
    17.Student deferment Durring Vietnam War
    18.Campained for Nelson Rockefiller 1965
    19.1990 CFR Member
    20.1994 As speaker he got GaT Passed. World bank,World trade org
    21.Newt favorit is FDR and Wilson written in his book
    22.Clinton programs Newt Saved from defunding EPA,National service org,Goals 2000 program for schools, Federal finance of local police, unpeacekeeping Missions for US service
    men. Source John Burch Society.

    • AlleyOops

      This is nonsense….anyone can post a list of things that have been voted on over the years and, without giving any embellishment….I struck gold in 1907 during the rush to make OK a settlement but the damn Indians took it away from me……of course it was their gold.

      • Steve

        Hey is record is his record. I posted the source. Now slap yourself for being foolish and trying to cover for this lib.

        • Steve

          Go to youtube and watch the John burch Society Vids. Google Newts Student deferment from vietnam. Now you know why Rush hates Newt. Now show me Ron Pauls record. Who is the true concervitive. Are You a Lib? Just asking..

  • Archangel

    This link is all you need to know to understand The Foreign Policy of Ron Paul! Take 10 minutes and watch and learn. He is not the crazy person you idiots make him out to be.

    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/12/17/have-trouble-with-ron-pauls-foreign-policy/

    • AlleyOops

      Published, edited & recorded by Ron Paul and his campaign….no doubt….

  • Kevin

    His economic understanding is superior to ANY presidential option we have on the table and is foreign policy is a refreshing alternative. You are all right that Iran is a threat to be watched closely, but it is our own long history of meddling that has brought this threat upon us. They do not hate us for our freedom, they hate us because we intervene in their affairs. Regardless of our ideals or intentions we as a people would retaliate violently and justifiably if the roles were reversed. Do not give into the fear and propaganda or the terrorists have won.

    The past two administrations have shown us bipartisan cooperation to dismantle rights guaranteed to us by the Constitution in the name of protecting us from terror. Voting for anyone else besides Ron Paul is a vote for the status quo which is more debt and less freedom. We are deviating from the principles that once revolutionized the free world. Imagine the progress we will make if we return to those ideals.

    Please understand that although we should be concerned with muslim extremists that we can not fix this issue with more war. We can not free these people to think like us. Through war we can only continue deeper and deeper into this conflict. When we have killed generations of young men and women, installed puppet leaders, and violated the sovereignty of another nation they will continue to be aggressive to us. The end game is muslim genocide. I personally will not stoop that low.

    • AlleyOops

      Having ‘them’ think like we do should not be the goal….but having them understand that we will do whatever it takes to defend and protect our sovereignty should be a goal spoken in spades.

      • 57 girl

        LOL. You should check into the CFR membership, google Bilderberg, the New World Order, the North American Union, and a few similar topics. If Ron Paul doesn’t win the White House, we may well lose our stars and stripes forever and it will be at the hand of the ‘domestic terrorists’ that have sold our Nation downstream for their political careers. If on the other hand, you really do want to save our Sovereignty, then you really need to take a look at what Ron Paul has to offer, because he is the only one that will at least try to resurrect our Constitution.

    • Michael

      No Kevin – they hate us because of their ideology. Radical Islam has one goal – conversion by sword. The flag of Islam must fly globally and Sharia Law is the only law that they want recognized. We have to maintain a proactive policy toward Islamic Extremism – or we suffer consequences similar to or worse than 9/11.

      None of us on this board want that. A head in the sand approach encouraged boldness with the attacks of the 90s and the 9/11 tragedy. Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a religion that seeks to impose itself globally – if not by voluntary submission – then by extreme measures. I , for one, refuse to voluntarily succumb to Sharia.

      • Kevin

        Michael, we did not have our heads in the sand. We amassed huge amounts of intelligence regarding proposed Bojinka related plots. We knew this was coming and we allowed it to happen. We knew who most of the terrorists were, because we had already been watching them. We knew they had been in our country before illegally.

        We are owned by war profiteers. Read War is a Racket by Smedley Butler.

        International law requires us to have a justification for war. Do you really think that our intelligence is so inept that we didn’t see these things coming? We were aware of similar impending attacks as evidenced by reports by our agents. We trained for these scenarios. However, we allowed them to happen in order to galvanize our will to go to war and garner international support.

  • B. Hill

    @ ressex….I keep hearing people say Ron Paul is looney, or his foreign policy is looney… but I never hear anyone say his economic policy is wrong or looney etc… what’s more important?

    I will tell you what is more important. A strong foreign policy is first!!! Because if you can’t afford to protect the most important second thing, being the economy, then who cares. We don’t need another country coming over the United States, trying to destroy us because of our wealth, when we have all these Muslims living all around us, destroying us within.

    And don’t tell me there are “nice” Muslim people and then the radicals. The nice Muslims are just those who inhabit the space while the extremist lead out on the front lines. Any person calling themselves a Muslim, believe in the Qu’ran. The Qu’ran specifically says that they will dominate the west one day and install Sharia Law. They are trying to get passage as I write this post, maybe in YOUR state right now.

    Wake UP America!

  • don o

    i will not vote for paul. these people in iowa are so stupid. there needs to be a change on how primaries are done. all states should vote on the same day not having these 4 states dictating who the rest of us have to vote for. if romney or paul win i will not vote nor will the rest of my family. when i voted for mccain that was the last time ,i will vote for another liberal or someone i do not want .

    • gtx13

      I’ll do the same thing… All my family and most of my friends… All cowards or mormons – KAPUT ! I’ll vote( against my wish) with the liberal communists as a going on of the previous punishment coming from God, against all hypocrites !

    • David

      I feel the same way, Don! Anybody but Ron Paul wins the primary, I will not vote for them! I will write-in my vote for Ron Paul!! We either get back to the Constitution or let the progressives win and let the chips fall where they may!!

      • AlleyOops

        Please explain what ‘getting back to the constitution’ means…Have we disposed of the constitution in favor of another document that we’ll be ruled by…Just asking.

        • 57 girl

          Read the headlines. Obama has trampled on our Constitution since he took office. Before him, GWB was spitting on it. We dropped bombs on Libya with the blessing of the UN and left Congress totally out of the loop. Our President can’t even come up with a legal birth certificate. The Patriot Act overrides our rights under the 4th Amendment as do the TSA body searches. And just today (yesterday?) a bill was passed giving our Government the right to arrest and detain American citizens without a trial. How many more rights should we waiver to be protected from the ‘terrorists’?

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW-e7z7S6VI

          • Michael

            And just where is your Ron Paul on the Constitutional requirement that the president be a natural – born citizen? Is he chasing a birth certificate? I don’t care where Obama was born – he is ineligible because a natural citizen had always been understood as a child born of two citizen parents. Obama does not deny his father was Kenyan – yet our professional politicians refuse to address it. They are either blind on purpose or on accident. In either case, Paul is just as much the insider as the rest of the gang.

          • 57 girl

            Honestly, I don’t know where he stands on the birth certificate issue. You are welcome to visit his website and search for the answer yourself if you like . . . ronpaul2012.com. However, I do know Ron Paul had suggested we should consider impeachment when Obama bombed Libya with the UN’s go ahead, rather than consulting Congress. I suspect Ron Paul is busy trying to wake the Nation up and doesn’t waste his time on issues when he feels it is fruitless. Ron Paul also warned us about allowing Obama to get away with the assassination of an American citizen with no trial because he was an ‘accused’ terrorist. I think if Ron Paul felt he would be backed up by his piers, he would want proof of citizenship since a President’s legitimacy is outlined by three prerequisites . . . 1) must be a natural born citizen, which, valid birth certificate or not, Obama’s father was not an American citizen. 2.) must have lived in America for the 14 years prior to running for office and 3.) be 35 years of age or older.

      • Michael

        Section 1 Article 8 of the US Constitution – not sure where you all see Iraq or Afghanistan as being unconstitutional. By point 1, 2 and throw in 6 for Afghanistan below they were legitimate. If the reference is to the appropriation of funds – whose fault is it that congress failed to pass a budget for a few years now? Whose fault is it that the democratic system played out and the congress voted in favor of said wars in the first place?

        To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

        To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

        To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

        To provide and maintain a Navy;

        To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

        To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

  • William

    Well since God sets up kingdom and takes kingdoms down look at what He has given us for our disbelief in HIS Kingdom Laws (Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Hillary,Reid, Pelosie, Obama) yes and even the Bushes)-so do not pass Ron Paul off so fast-it’s God who puts our leaders in place not us in spite of what we’ve been taught about voting-yep that’s right!

  • Kevin

    Oh god the irony. We can’t elect this immoral racist Ron Paul, because he hates black people AND he doesn’t want to help us kill all the brown people!

    • 57 girl

      Careful there Kevin, the sheep will mistake your sarcasm and think you are on their side.

  • NOZ

    TO ALL THE GOD FEARING RELIGIOSITY PEOPLE, WHEN ANY PERSON CAN SHOW WHAT GOD LOOKS LIKE, YOUR BELIEF IN YOUR GOD IS REAL AND TRUE. TILL THAN, TAKE OUT THE RELIGION. USE COMMON SENSE, TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON THAT PLACE,
    1. COUNTRY [CONSTITUTION ] 2. JOBS 3. FAMILY 4. LIBERTY 5. FREEDOM ….RELIGION.
    GOD DOES NOT SIGN YOUR PAYCHECK, WALL STREET AND MEGA-BANKS ARE STEALING YOUR MONEY, GOD HAVE YET TO STOP THE EVIL GREEDY WALL STREET AND BANKERS, ONLY THE AMERICAN VOTERS CAN STOP ALL THIS HEINOUS GREED.

    • Michael

      NOZ – we’ve been doing that for the century and we are reaping our reward. God does sign my paycheck. He is my authority in all. We asked for God to be removed from the schools. He left and was replaced by guns, drugs and leftist indoctrination. Common sense – or coincidence. Not a tough call on my end.

      Until we place God first, we will keep finding the same type of candidate over and over again.

  • gtx13

    We’ll vote for Newt, a Christian and a great American patriot ! Don’t vote for cowards or mormons !!

    • David

      Maybe you should vet your precious Newt a little better! He is a progressive!! Always has been and always will be!!!

    • Steve

      Newt Got a student deferment from Vietnam. Draft dogging Lib.

    • Steve

      Patriot lol. While our real patriots were in vietnam he was getting high and getting laid. Student deferments are sweet Gave him time to help Nelson Rockefillers campain. 1965 (fact) Learned all about the CFR and was known as Joddy to our troops.

    • RioSam

      Check out the well-written story here:

      http://milwaukeestory.com/index.php/2011/12/19/pentagon-says

      And the Department of Defense report from 2010 here:

      http://www.scribd.com/doc/30277432/DoD-Unclassified-Report-o

      Key quotes:

      “Iran’s nuclear program and its willingness to keep open the possibility of developing nuclear weapons is a central part of its deterrent strategy.”

      “At present Iran’s forces are sufficent to deter or defend against conventional threats from Iran’s weaker neighbors such as post-war Iraq, the GCC, Azerbaijan or Afghanistan but lack the air power and logistical ability to power much beyond Iran’s boarders or to confront regional powers such as Turkey or Israel.”
      Let the lies be shamed and solid evidence be revealed!

      RON PAUL FOR TRUTH LIBERTY JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY!
      LOL .. Couldn’t help it…..I LOVE SUPERMAN! AND RON PAUL!

  • KSmith

    Gingrich and Romney carry more negative baggage for conservatives than does Ron Paul. At least Paul has consistently advocated following the Constitution. Conservatives should concentrate on electing conservatives to the Senate. Conservatives there could keep Gingrich or Romney in check. I urge conservatives to join Sen. DeMint in the Senate Conservative Fund and help to elect principled candidates to that body.

  • No

    Ron Paul is the only ‘Man’ running worth voting for. Government foreign policy is as corrupt as their domestic policy. We are rapidly loosing freedoms here at home, if Ron Paul does not get the nomination we will eventually go so far down the road to globalism there will be no turning back. He wants to get out of the UN and Nato and the most honest preacher in this country is backing him “Chuck Baldwin”. Chuck happens to be public enemy number one on the SPLC’s hit list and those are the kind of credentials I like. I am not afraid of Iran or any other country I am concerned about the enemy within the gates who wants to destroy our LIBERTY.
    God BLESS America RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!

    • Susie

      Thank you for your post. I appreciated it.

  • http://www.ifixlive.com ibaconi

    I’d be better than Ron Paul, but Ron Paul is the only one in the running with any record of dependability in terms of his philosophy. He stands where he claims to stand which is a marvelous rarity in the political world. He’s in favor of shutting down the Fed, a stronger move towards American defense than any move taken in the middle east has been, even in a figurative sense. A move which places his own life in true jeopardy, which makes him a warrior in my book!

    • RioSam

      In by book too! A true patriotic warrior indeed!

      RON PAUL 2012

  • Jeanie

    IF YOU WANT TO DAYLIGHTS SCARED OUT OF YOU READ THE FOLLOWING:
    THIS HAS BEEN CHECK AND RECHECKED AND VERIFIED TO ALL BE TRUE.
    THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE OBAMA’S CRONIES AND SOME FROM CHICAGO PICKED TO START UPHEAVAL IN OUR COUNTRY. THE OCC UPIERS FOR ONE: REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING NAMES:
    1. Kalle Lasn
    2. Wade Rathke
    3. Stephen Lerner
    4. Lisa Fithian (Obama uses her from Chicago as the so called “great activist”
    READ THE FOLLOWING TO BE SCARED:
    http://grumpyelder.com/?p=10350 TEA PARTY NATION: “The Puppetmasters”

    • Michael

      Islamists in the Middle East – In the fall of 2011, Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei​, lauded OWS for having “exposed” the “corrupt foundation” of American society, and gleefully predicted that the movement would “grow so that it will bring down the capitalist system and the West.” The Deputy Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces for Culture and Defense Publicity, General Seyed Massoud Jazzayeri, likewise characterized OWS not only as “a revolution and a comprehensive movement against corruption in the U.S.,” but as a force that “will no doubt end in the downfall of the Western capitalist system.” Further, he framed OWS as the beginning of an “American Spring”—akin to the Arab Spring uprisings that had already toppled three longstanding Mideast regimes. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast suggested that OWS signaled the political awakening of the American people, but lamented that U.S. authorities were “intolerant” of its peaceful demonstrations. And a website affiliated with the Islamist terror group Hezbollah portrayed OWS as a movement that was courageously exposing the “corruption, poverty [and] social inequality in the U.S.”

      Don’t think these guys are shaking over Ron Paul’s foreign policy.

  • Brad Yates

    I have now become very leery of Iowans! What are you guys thinking? Ron Paul is so out of touch with reality, especially when it comes to foreign relations and defense. He is not suitable to be the Republican nominee, for goodness sake!!! Do you jokers want the stink man, b. o.,
    in there for 4 more?

  • Rob H

    You people leaving comments have NO IDEA what you’re talking about. Almost everything “bad” mentioned about Ron Paul is the opposite of the truth. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. LET RON PAULS WORDS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES, AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF.

    I am confident, the more you research the man the more you too will realize he is a man of great integrity and intellect.

  • Restore Constitutional Government

    Too many Zombies here . . .

    Zombie = blinded by denial of factual historical experience, walking with failed dead policies.

    http://www.ronpaul2012.com

  • 57 girl

    d-Rash . . . you said . . .WHY are democrats supporting Ron Paul? Because he is the ONLY candidate they know, Obama can beat! . . .As a response, I am asking . . . if that is the case, why don’t those same Democrats simply vote for Obama to begin with. I suspect those Democrats have seen the light and love their Country more than they do their party. United, we stand!

  • Bugger

    Wow, what a collection of loonies this forum is. I read it once in a while to see how far the human brain can deceive itself. Congrats, Michael, Southerner, Ron, Salleeann, Easitduk, Retired Marine, Major Corcoran, and so many others, for qualifying this forum for the lunatic asylum.

    • Michael

      Why don’t you present a fact or two for support. The ad-hominem is rather cowardly and simple minded. You have taken the low road. If you want to discuss your position intelligently, bring it. I give credit where do to most of these Paul supporters for at least doing just that. You got a beef – spell it out or leave my name out of it friend.

      • Steve

        Well said Michael!!

        • Michael

          Thank you Steve. It is bad enough that we put up with this from the left at every turn – I refuse to tolerate that behavior from those who claim to embrace many of the same political views that I do. If I get out of line in the heat of the moment – I hope that any of you would call me on it also.

      • Bugger

        “Why don’t you present a fact or two for support…” The facts are displayed by the responses of those I mentioned. The vast majority of the responses here are fact-less, distortions, reflections of hate, and just plain stupid. Please make your suggestion for facts to the overwhelming number of idiots who post here. It won’t do any good, because these idiots don’t know fact from fiction and think discussion is presenting your own belief. In other forums, I’ve tried the rational approach, as you suggest, but I’ve since learned it’s a waste of time, but I’m now able to identify who are lunatics and who aren’t. This forum is packed with lunatics. If you had sense, you’d find a more rewarding forum for your rational approach.

  • MAC

    Apparently none of the people here from Paulville saw his ridiculous and shameful performance on Jay Leno. He sounded like a Democrat smearing Bachman and Santorum.
    Paul is simply not presidential and too kooky to ever be elected to national office. . . let’s be honest, he appeals to a lot of folks because he is so simplistic in his logic and his arguments sometimes. . . (Iran is the perfect example of this, simple, but wrong) He’s always been like this, what is concerning is that this time around he’s getting into smearing his competition a whole lot more than he ever has in his past campaigns.

    • Steve

      No I missed it when I read newt recieve a student deferment from vietnam. I was barfing in the toilet. Wow newt is so presidential. Us simple foke want our kids to stay home and you smart foke can fight ww3. Leave us out of it.

    • Michael

      “RioSam says:
      December 19, 2011 at 4:02 pm

      So what you’re saying is lets do something stupid again and hope for a different outcome..
      Typical sheeple!
      RON PAUL 2012″

      How about leaving the personal attacks to the left? You and your candidate want to be taken seriously? Same results? If we have Ron Paul as our nominee one result will be the same – an Obama victory in 2012. That is the result I care most about. Foolish foreign policy – relying on a “because I said so” interpretation of the Constitution. Go back and read Section 1 Article 8 of the Constitution. Find a legitimate reason why Afghanistan and Iraq are unconstitutional. Then check back and tell my why I’m a sheep!

  • RioSam

    The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) warrantless surveillance controversy
    (“Warrantless Wiretapping”) concerns surveillance of persons within the United
    States during the collection of foreign intelligence by the NSA as part of the war on
    terror. These 19 guys and a camel have been used to take all our liberties away.
    First was the “Warrantless Wiretapping” and then the kill switch for the internet,
    and now it is the National Defense Authorization Act that will authorize the military to
    attack citizens like the Occupy Wall Street crowd and anyone else that protests about the destruction of the
    Constitution and eventually what happens when government encounters the “no bid day” and cannot sell its debt
    any longer. They will need the troops to stem the civil unrest. They will never criminally charge Goldman Sachs for
    (1) they did the reverse takeover of government and even ran Princeton Economics by court order, and (2) the
    government needs them to sell their debt. Only Ron Paul has the courage to stand tall. The press tries so hard to
    ignore him but the polls show he is the ONLY person who could beat
    Obama, yet the Republicans ignore him. Obama talked a good game but did
    nothing different from Bush. They are turning out the lights.
    Ron Paul is our last hope before we go completely down the
    rabbit hole. We have to turn politics on its head before it is too
    late. It’s the debt and Goldman that will fail to keep it rolling forever.

    http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fvisiontoamerica.org%2F6402%2Ffemas-emergency-detention-camps-hiring-begins%2F%23.Tuz1vUh-WfA.facebook&h=-AQE-uGvEAQGx0p9_YGG4t2GaQeNMijvlwEMq9-DA9fAgGA

  • David Wooldridge

    All of this bantering back and forth is doing no good whatsoever for ANY candidate. You cannot pick and choose your issue over any other issue; if you want to send a cafeteria- style President to D.C, we ALL lose. Dr. Paul, in my opinion, is a charlatan; he is no closer to Conservative issues than BHO. The man is a Libertarian, dressed in a Republican suit, just to make himself more mainstream. He is just as far to the right as Barack is to the left. Do you really want an isolationist government that doesn’t see 3 miles beyond our borders?
    Up to this point, I’ve not looked too closely @ Dr. Paul, because I was studying the people who have a realists’ chance to win. Once I listened to his own words out of his own mouth, this guy would have us back in the 18th Century, to rebuild what Barack has undone.
    But I will say that I do not trust the GOP either. They are just as money hungry as Barack is. We need to inject the TEA Party into the equation, and get REAL Conservative people into leadership roles. I see none of that from ANYBODY yet. Progressives, plenty. Conservatives, NONE.

  • sfcpete

    Ron Paul and his wing nuts will ensure Barrys continued socialism of the Great Republic

    • Anthony

      sfcpete I realize your IQ is very low……..so you’re incapable of handling the truth! I realize it goes way over your head!

  • RioSam

    Ron Paul understands what we need, and like a concerned father figure, he is ringing the bell for a systemic housecleaning. It scares us because we know it will be hard. However, more people are starting to accept the notion that serious reform is the only option if we are to avoid even more pain down the road. We have reached the end of the line.

  • Anthony

    Remember Ron Paul is trying to wake-up a 100years of brainwashing! Boy there is a lot of brainwashed sheep on this site!

  • RioSam

    FYI-
    Posted on December 18, 2011 at 3:55pm by Becket Adams of The Blaze
    50 Facts About The U.S. Economy That Will Shock You
    Here are the 50 economic numbers from 2011 that will shock you (via The Economic Collapse):

    1. A staggering 48 percent of all Americans are either considered to be “low income” or are living in poverty.

    2. Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be “low income” or impoverished.

    3. If the number of Americans that “wanted jobs” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would be up to 11 percent.

    4. The average amount of time that a worker stays unemployed in the United States is now over 40 weeks.

    5. One recent survey found that 77 percent of all U.S. small businesses do not plan to hire any more workers.

    6. There are fewer payroll jobs in the United States today than there were back in 2000 even though we have added 30 million extra people to the population since then.

    7. Since December 2007, median household income in the United States has declined by a total of 6.8 percent once you account for inflation.

    8. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 16.6 million Americans were self-employed back in December 2006. Today, that number has shrunk to 14.5 million.

    9. A Gallup poll from earlier this year found that approximately one out of every five Americans that do have a job consider themselves to be underemployed.

    10. According to author Paul Osterman, about 20 percent of all U.S. adults are currently working jobs that pay poverty-level wages.

    11. Back in 1980, less than 30 percent of all jobs in the United States were low income jobs. Today, more than 40 percent of all jobs in the United States are low income jobs.

    12. Back in 1969, 95 percent of all men between the ages of 25 and 54 had a job. In July, only 81.2 percent of men in that age group had a job.

    13. One recent survey found that one out of every three Americans would not be able to make a mortgage or rent payment next month if they suddenly lost their current job.

    14. The Federal Reserve recently announced that the total net worth of U.S. households declined by 4.1 percent in the 3rd quarter of 2011 alone.

    15. According to a recent study conducted by the BlackRock Investment Institute, the ratio of household debt to personal income in the United States is now 154 percent.

    16. As the economy has slowed down, so has the number of marriages. According to a Pew Research Center analysis, only 51 percent of all Americans that are at least 18 years old are currently married. Back in 1960, 72 percent of all U.S. adults were married.

    17. The U.S. Postal Service has lost more than 5 billion dollars over the past year.

    18. In Stockton, California home prices have declined 64 percent from where they were at when the housing market peaked.

    19. Nevada has had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation for 59 months in a row.

    20. If you can believe it, the median price of a home in Detroit is now just $6000.

    21. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 18 percent of all homes in the state of Florida are sitting vacant. That figure is 63 percent larger than it was just ten years ago.

    22. New home construction in the United States is on pace to set a brand new all-time record low in 2011.

    23. 19 percent of all American men between the ages of 25 and 34 are now living with their parents.

    24. Electricity bills in the United States have risen faster than the overall rate of inflation for five years in a row.

    25. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, health care costs accounted for just 9.5 percent of all personal consumption back in 1980. Today they account for approximately 16.3 percent.

    26. One study found that approximately 41 percent of all working age Americans either have medical bill problems or are currently paying off medical debt.

    27. If you can believe it, one out of every seven Americans has at least 10 credit cards.

    28. The United States spends about 4 dollars on goods and services from China for every one dollar that China spends on goods and services from the United States.

    29. It is being projected that the U.S. trade deficit for 2011 will be 558.2 billion dollars.

    30. The retirement crisis in the United States just continues to get worse. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 46 percent of all American workers have less than $10,000 saved for retirement, and 29 percent of all American workers have less than $1,000 saved for retirement.

    31. Today, one out of every six elderly Americans lives below the federal poverty line.

    32. According to a study that was just released, CEO pay at America’s biggest companies rose by 36.5 percent in just one recent 12 month period.

    33. Today, the “too big to fail” banks are larger than ever. The total assets of the six largest U.S. banks increased by 39 percent between September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2011.

    34. The six heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton have a net worth that is roughly equal to the bottom 30 percent of all Americans combined.

    35. According to an analysis of Census Bureau data done by the Pew Research Center, the median net worth for households led by someone 65 years of age or older is 47 times greater than the median net worth for households led by someone under the age of 35.

    36. If you can believe it, 37 percent of all U.S. households that are led by someone under the age of 35 have a net worth of zero or less than zero.

    37. A higher percentage of Americans is living in extreme poverty (6.7 percent) than has ever been measured before.

    38. Child homelessness in the United States is now 33 percent higher than it was back in 2007.

    39. Since 2007, the number of children living in poverty in the state of California has increased by 30 percent.

    40. Sadly, child poverty is absolutely exploding all over America. According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4 percent of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1 percent of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6 percent of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6 percent of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.

    41. Today, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

    42. In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7 percent of all income. Today, government transfer payments account for more than 18 percent of all income.

    43. A staggering 48.5 percent of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.

    44. Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.

    45. For fiscal year 2011, the U.S. federal government had a budget deficit of nearly 1.3 trillion dollars. That was the third year in a row that our budget deficit has topped one trillion dollars.

    46. If Bill Gates gave every single penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for about 15 days.

    47. Amazingly, the U.S. government has now accumulated a total debt of 15 trillion dollars. When Barack Obama first took office the national debt was just 10.6 trillion dollars.

    48. If the federal government began right at this moment to repay the U.S. national debt at a rate of one dollar per second, it would take over 440,000 years to pay off the national debt.

    49. The U.S. national debt has been increasing by an average of more than 4 billion dollars per day since the beginning of the Obama administration.

    50. During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.

    Of course, after going through all these numbers, the obvious question is, “how has it come to this?” The Economic Collapse has a simple answer:

    . . . the heart of our economic problems is the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is a perpetual debt machine, it has almost completely destroyed the value of the U.S. dollar and it has an absolutely nightmarish track record of incompetence. If the Federal Reserve system had never been created, the U.S. economy would be in far better shape. The federal government needs to shut down the Federal Reserve and start issuing currency that is not debt-based.

    But who among America’s leaders has the will and determination to do this? Judging by how the Obama administration has conducted itself thus far, it probably won’t consider (let alone implement) any of the suggestions mentioned in the above. Therefore, that leaves only the GOP candidates.

    Who among them has the best chance to restore economic stability? Who is the most likely to return the U.S. to prosperity?

    “Hopefully next year more Americans than ever will wake up, because 2012 is going to represent a huge turning point for this country,” TEC writes.

    Indeed, 2012 may be one of the biggest turning points this country has ever seen.

    (h/t Zero

    • Anthony

      Good job RioSam!!!!! But most of the sheep on this site have a very low IQ…….so they are incapable understanding any of it!

      • Michael

        Anthony – are you sure you are not a liberal hurling insults. Each time I see the liberal-assed name calling that I am seeing out here, I am less likely to vote for Ron Paul. The feeling in this part is that the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree. I don’t care how sharp you think you are, you are dealing with fellow conservatives and if you can’t do so respectfully, you tarnish the efforts of some of the other Paul backers out here. From where I sit, you aren’t much different than the Obamites playing the race card and questioning our intelligence. This guy’s foreign policy is a legit concern. Shouting down the IQ of those who disagree with you casts your own level of intelligence into doubt.

        Rio-sam – There are few that disagree that the federal reserve is HUGE issue. The candidate that receives my support will not be one dimensional. All of these candidates offer an upgrade ion the economic policy of this administration. I’m not sure how many of us can live with a consequences of a less than desirable foreign strategy.

        It’s not a question of “who started it” with these guys over there. If the Islamic radicals held a grudge for better than twenty-five years as Paul claims – they aren’t going away at all through appeasement.

  • tncdel

    I’m no Romney fan, but I’d rather see him [or Bachmann] get the GOP nomination than either Gingrich or Ron Paul. Here’s why:
    https://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/2012-presidential-hopefuls-immigration-stances.html?

  • Al from Fl

    Boy, the establishment sure doesn’t want to see Gringrich win the nomination. Must be a reason – like he pushed for a balanced budget as speaker, he has ideas that will make a difference in areas that are fundamentally flawed etc. The news media loves it. Romney seems to want to just tweak around the edges. i’m sure he will be better than Pres Obama but he will not make major changes to our tax system or health care based on what he has said on FNC Sunday and O’Reilly tonight. It’s kind of business as usual. Gringrich is the only one who can take Obama in a debate. If you want ideas for the people to pressure congress, than Gringrich, Perry, Cain are the best bet. Voters will have to decide what is important for America’s future. The establishment/news media’s focus is to keep their jobs and their connections with the lobbyists.

    • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

      Yeah right. The establishment loves Gingrich. Stop trying to use reverse psycology on us. We are not stupid. Gingrich is a flip flopper and he is a progressive. He has no core values. He doesn’t deserve to be president. He supported TARP and he is no conservative. This is coming from a Ron Paul r3VOLution freedom fighter, not from the GOP establishment.

      • paula

        yes

  • Paul W. Brock

    With Gingrich, picture Gloria Allred and a bimbo parade which will dominate the evening news. The media will use the Chinese torture technique i.e. Herman Cain. Americans will see the ploy and flee by to the “family values” president. Michelle and Barack with kids will be displayed all over the screen, with the words of what a family man he is. Ron Paul would be the democrats choice. They will play him as the grumpy old man next door who shouts “hey kids get off my lawn.” The media will display him as a “kook” and too dangerous to trust with national defense. And Ron Paul’s followers are so kooky themselves. As I said before their threat to form a third party if Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination is a threat to the liberty of this country, because it will insure that Obama wins by splitting the conservative vote. I like a lot of Ron Paul’s ideas, but he is hardly ready to lead this nation.

    • Terry Black

      So you are saying what? You’d rather vote for a CFR Globalist agenda for America, your family and yourself, by either voting for Romney or Gingrich?

      I suggest you read a small article at: http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/how-many-millionaires-are-congress

      Scroll down to the square marked Paul Revere Oct.2/2010 and read that little article!
      It will tell you all about the purpose of the CFR!

  • Dale

    I keep hearing RON PAUL can`t be elected. If all of you here took the opposite tac, and tried with all your ability to get RON PAUL ELECTED you would find a very good man, an honest man. and I believe a very good president, way way better than the present muslim on charge .
    Think about his RON PAULS FOREIGN POLICY for a minute or two. It makes perfect sense we HAVE to stop nation building, we also have to astop trying to be the policeman of the world.
    Look at all the bases we have around the world that have NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. WE NEED TO BRING THEESE BOYS AND GIRLS HOME. ISRAEL CAN TAKE CARE OF ITSELF THEIR OWN PEOPLE SAID IN WASHINGTON LAST WEEK OR SO THAT THEY CAN HANDLE THEIR OWN AFFAIRS. THEY DO NOT NEED US TELLING THEM WHAT THEY CAN OR CAN NOT DO INTHEIR COUNTRY WE NEED TO BUTT OUT. LETS GET ALLTHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY TODAY FIXED THEN WORRY ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. AND AS FAR AS OUR ECONOMY THERE ISN`T ANY OUT THERE BETTER TO HANDLE THE FEDERAL RESERVE THAN RON PAUL
    RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012 GOD BLESS AMERICA AND MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL

    • Michael

      Dale – I respectfully disagree with the overall nature of the policy. It is more than just a fence against nation building. It is a recognition that this enemy is with an ideology that is bent on destruction of America and Israel. This is exactly where we were pre-9/11 and Mr. Paul can’t seem to wrap his arms around that. I do appreciate the classy manner in which you presented your case. I’m pleased to see that there are several that can do so without hurling insults.

      • CJ

        An idealogoy? Then why were Jews and Muslims living side by side in Palestine for years. It wasn’t until 1948, when Israel became a state that all hell broke out. When the Zionist Talmudic Jews started slaughtering 1000′s of Palestians (some of the were Christians) and the US backing Israel is when the hate began. If it’s an idealogy, then why just the US and Israel- doesn’t make any sense, but our foreign policy does.

    • paula

      you are right on my friend

  • Michael

    Jason Burns – “The reason 9/11 happened is because of too much regulation. If guns were allowed on the planes, 9/11 wouldn’t have been able to happen.”

    Some of what you said made sense – but not this. The reason 9/11 happened is lack of vigilance and lack of sharing what information we did have. I am all for the 2nd Amendment – but you have to place and enforce restrictions on guns. Drug cartels carry guns. Criminals of all varieties carry guns. There has to be some degree of protection for the innocent. There shouldn’t be a zero tolerance policy for guns on board – but you can’t have just any old body jumping on a plane with a concealed weapon.

    • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

      I am talking about armed guards on planes. When transporting money they have armed guards, but not with people. If there were armed guards on the planes, 9/11 wouldn’t have happened. In a free market, the airlines would be competing with one another and security would be competitive. Since we don’t have a true free market without manipulation and over-regulation, this wasn’t available. That is what I was getting at.

  • RLPartridge

    If George Washington or Thomas Jefferson was running for president some of you guys would say the same things about them because Paul is only saying essentially what they said. The guys who did 9/11 weren’t Iraquis or Afghans. They were Saudis, so crazy Dubby takes us to war against people who had nothing to do with it. The Iraquis hated Alquaida.

    Think about it.

    • Michael

      No RLPartridge – when will some of you come to understand that we are not at war with a country. We are at war with an IDEOLOGY that has long ago declared war on us. The common thread is radical Islam.

      We were in Afghanistan because Bin Laden was being hidden there….along with several key Al-Quada operatives. We were in Iraq due to repeated failure to allow weapons inspectors into the into the country.

      • Al

        At Michael;
        Please explain to me how do you think the United States as a country can defeat an “Idea” by killing people? Wouldn’t you think that killing people in would only add to their solitude and strengthen their convictions in this ideological stance?

      • Sumerian Man

        Michael, when will you understand that we are really at war with a government run wild! Big money, foreign interests, power and greed have totally taken over our country from within and we are dangling at the end of a rope unless we can turn the tables on them now! The only candidate with the cohonahs to do just that is Ron Paul. This is why he is so feared by everyone including most of the GOP. The only dirt on him are his so called radical ideas (fiscally sound small government and take care of America first), and whatever words he may have spoken that can be twisted into something way out of context. (few and far between and exposed to be twisted) This explains why he is truly all but ignored by the media, they literally can’t expose him of any wrong doing. He is feared by all because he WILL change the status quo in government and many in power will be exposed or left out. That little guy in the oversized suit is the most democratically feared man in congress and let’s not leave out the RINO’s at the GOP. His policies will institute REAL change in government, change like honesty and responsibility! Study the man, check his voting, watch or read his speeches past and present, check out the videos. The only thing wrong with Ron Paul is he is he has been trying to be a shepherd to flock of mangy, rabid wolves. Vote Ron Paul or kiss America and your freedoms goodbye. No chit.

    • RioSam

      I totally agree. The warmongers and supporters of the corporate fascists would call Washington or Jefferson or Adams, kooky, nutball they need to be in a insane asylmn and all the other nasty remarks they’ve come up with..
      What in the hell is wrong with wanting to return our country to a Constitutional Republic?? Wakin up is so very hard to do!

      Ron Paul a true and brave Patriot!

  • Bud MacGuire

    It seems that the Israeli lobby is out in force now to sink the Ron Paul presidential campaign. They do not like his promise of peace and prsperity for America. But really, if America keeps up these incessant wars, America will be bankrupt and unable even to defend herself. But Israel has no need of American defence. She is very capable of defending herself; but it’s a lot cheaper to let Uncle Sam do the defence for her.

    • RioSam

      EXACTLY RIGHT! And that is there plan coming from both sides, Rep and Dem. Descimate America is their Agenda. Look at the NDAA ACT this totally throws out the Constitution and Bill of Rights!
      Wakin up is hard do

      RON PAUL 2012

  • http://r3voluti0n.com Jason Burns

    Neocons are stupid. That’s all.

  • Mountain Saint

    By Ron Paul saying that the born-again Christian Bachmann hated Moslems, he turned off Joseph Farah… I have always been leary of Ron Paul and I consider him a kook. Because of his ideology, he won’t be able to save America. He will have his 15 minutes of fame and then he can return to the nursing home, along with Gingrich. Nice try but no prize.

  • 2WarAbnVet

    No true patriot can support Ron Paul. That critical element of the Constitution that he eschews is the government’s responsibility for national defense. He would decimate the military, and make America one of the weakest nations on earth. He would allow our enemies free rein to run roughshod about the world. While Obama seeks to destroy our children’s future through active measures Paul would accomplish the same outcome through inaction.

  • paula

    If Ron Paul’s foreign policy is so bad, why does the military support him?
    Those who oppose his foreign policy should be willing to put their lives on the line instead of putting someone elses life on the line.

  • RioSam

    The hyping of the potential nuclear program in Iran is Washington’s attempt to establish a pretext that would garner public support for a strike/destabilization campaign on Iran. The obvious goal would be regime change.

    So the real reason the Pentagon sees a nuclear program in Iran as a threat is not because it would be used as a first strike weapon against Israel, but because it would make it more difficult for the US and its allies to take out the regime in Tehran.

    Many in Washington would love to have cooperative leadership in place in Tehran because it would tilt the control of world energy resources sharply in favor of the US and its allies. But as long as Iran is rogue and friendly with Russia and China we can expect to hear about Iran’s potential nuclear program and the danger it presents Israel and the world.

    In the light of these facts the current debate in the Republican presidential primary seems like nothing but propaganda, save the argument made by Ron
    Paul.

  • McClarinJ

    Is this where neoconservatives anonymous meets? I have to say my neoconservatism feels threatened by this skinny old guy who won’t shut up in the debates. Can’t someone say something intelligent that would allay my fears?

  • RioSam
  • NoBama

    Israel Agrees With Ron Paul
    “We don’t need you to fight our battles!”
    Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel agrees with Ron Paul
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ECgLpwPg4&feature=player_embedded

    I’m sure Bachman was there when Netanyahu addressed congress a couple of months ago, and she knows Israel doesn’t need us…. so why does she want to continuously bankrupt our country with wars, wars, wars and the lives of our children dying for WHAT?

    No thanks! I’m going with the only peace and prosperity, not to mention, LIBERTY candidate- Ron Paul. He’s the ONLY one worthy of my vote.

  • Bonnie

    I wish I had the time to read all the comments, but it would be a waste of time as most on this forum are horribly misinformed. They expose themselves as sheeple who’ve been indoctrinated by the media. If Ron Paul is not nominated and/or elected President, you all will find yourselves enslaved without ANY rights. And it will be just, as none of you spouting your lies and spewing the propaganda you’ve been indoctrinated with all over this board, deserve to be free. Those of you who profess Christianity by slamming the only true Christian running for POTUS and the only One who can save you from slavery deserve Obama for president because you will cause it to happen because, quite frankly, you’re too ignorant to handle freedom. Furthermore, you don’t deserve to be free. If killing innocents abroad is your idea of what Jesus Christ would support, seriously, you need to examine your “god”. I’m certain he is not the One you claim to worship.

    And for those of you who are Ron Paul’s supporters, you’re wasting time here. These people are clearly ignorant and uninformed and would never take the effort it takes to find the truth. They believe the lies they’ve been fed and any effort to help them is futile. 2 Thess 2 mentions these people. “Because they loved not the truth, God will send a strong delusion that they should believe a lie”. God will destroy these people, but first He will hand them over to Satan in the Great Tribulation. So, quit wasting your time. Put your efforts persuading those who genuinely love Christ and follow Him. These people are deceived and love to be so. Let them be.

    • Orrie

      Thank you, Bonnie! I could not said it better. The blind follows the blind and they all fall into the pit.

  • CJ

    Samuel Pettengill, a Congressman in the 1930′s wrote a book(1940′s) titled “Smoke-Screen”. Here is one quote from the book:
    “The progress will be gradual, but the end inevitable. There will be no coup d’etat. The march will be step by step and by muffled tread. It will move under the smoke screen of laudable “objectives” to its hidden goal. That goal is National Socialism.”

    The D objects to the R, but it still passes.
    The R objects to the D, but it still passes
    And they keep marching.

    We need Ron Paul now more than ever.
    For Ron Paul supporters: go to Amazon and check this book out. ” the Naked Capitalist” and the book “Smoke-Screen”. I read a few pages of the Naked Capitalist and I just couldn’t believe what FDR said about the middle class, made my blood boil.

  • Orrie

    It is people who have been taught in the schools of progressives that have no understanding of the Constitution. They follow the talking heads on mainstream media like little sheep and cannot think for themselves. When they go to vote it will be for more of the same big brother government because they don’t know any better. It is why Obama is sitting in the White House and will be replaced by another who will lead us into WWIII. So, choose another NWO puppet to satisfy your hunger for war and you will get it.

  • Bonnie

    Thank you, my brothers and sisters. I only hope our words have planted seeds in someone here on this forum as I am absolutely certain we have entered that time the Bible speaks of as the Great Tribulation where only a few of God’s remnants will escape. For the rest of humanity, there will be no escape. We can only pray that there are some on this page who will awaken to the truth and hear the still, small voice of the Holy Spirit before it is too late.

  • Bonnie

    David Wooldridge says:
    December 19, 2011 at 8:00 pm
    “All of this bantering back and forth is doing no good whatsoever for ANY candidate. You cannot pick and choose your issue over any other issue; if you want to send a cafeteria- style President to D.C, we ALL lose. Dr. Paul, in my opinion, is a charlatan; he is no closer to Conservative issues than BHO. The man is a Libertarian, dressed in a Republican suit, just to make himself more mainstream. He is just as far to the right as Barack is to the left. Do you really want an isolationist government that doesn’t see 3 miles beyond our borders?
    Up to this point, I’ve not looked too closely @ Dr. Paul, because I was studying the people who have a realists’ chance to win. Once I listened to his own words out of his own mouth..”

    David, did you inherit psychic powers? HOW do you know Ron Paul can’t win? The same was said of Ronald Reagan and he won both times in a landslide and the country was glad to have him for 8 years. Ron Paul will, too, but only if the majority reverse their steps and quit listening to the lies they’ve been fed as Orrie so concisely stated on December 20, 2011 at 6:20 am.
    If you HAD looked more closely at Ron Paul, you would know that he is the ONLY one who can take us out of this mess and return us to sanity. In your statement, you made it clear to me and the others supporting Ron Paul that you do not seriously study each and every candidate. Obviously, you heard from another (who also does not seriously study the candidates) who told you that Ron Paul is “unelectable” or did you hear it from the lying media? Was YOUR candidate in 2008 “electable”?
    I suggest that you all TODAY accept my challenge to spend the rest of this day listening to and reading everything POSITIVE you can find about Ron Paul. His supporters have the reputation they do for a good reason. You really should find out “why”.

  • Nanette

    Oh my, the only reason Ron Paul is moving up in Iowa is that he has one of the biggest media blitz of negative ads against Gingrich! How easily Americans are persuaded by advertisements! That is exactly how Obama will win, dummies! Do you really BELIEVE Ron Paul will be a good Presidential Candidate??? This man is so out of touch with reality it is scary! He is an isolationist if I ever saw one! To think for one moment that Iran and other nations around the world will not attack us and Israel, he is crazy! His thinking goes back a few generations, perhaps colonial days! For sure, he would lose to Obama, are you kidding!

    • tomas

      Funny, those people who “fell” for the negative ads aren’t any worse than the who believe the war propaganda against Iran.
      I was stationed overseas. Ron Paul tells the truth. People don’t enjoy admitting mistakes their country has made.

    • Al

      I pity you… It must be terrible to live in fear of something that’s not even real.
      And really, it isn’t very difficult to run a negative Newt ad. All you need to do is tell the truth about him for 30 Seconds…
      On the flip-side, how much more support would Ron Paul have if the Main Stream Media supported him as much as the other candidates? They either ignore him completely or call him a crazy… They wouldn’t dare do that to Mitt or Newt…

      • Bonnie

        I’d like to add to your comment, if I may.

        Why can’t people see that the media attacks only Ron Paul? They insult him, ridicule him to his face, lie to his face, NEVER treat him with respect. Imagine the media giving any other candidate the same treatment they give Ron Paul. People would be mortified! Yet, Ron Paul, the Christian man that he is, turns the other cheek and never responds in kind. He is ALWAYS the gentleman This is just one of the characteristics that his supporters love about him. Don’t mistake his meekness as weakness. If you do, you don’t know the difference between the two.
        4235. praios prah’-os a form of 4239, used in certain parts; gentle, i.e. humble:–meek.
        Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth.

        • http://JohnGalt.Princeton@gmail.com John Galt

          Bonnie:
          “Why can’t people see that the media attacks only Ron Paul? ” WHAT!? The media attacks have been on Governor Sara Palin from her nomination for Vice President up to the time of her recent announcement! The viciousness of the attacks from Left and Right are unprecedented!

  • tomas

    Ron Paul could easily beat Obama. He’s socially liberal but fiscally conservative. That’s how most people are. Obama’s pro war.. Ron Paul’s not. It’s good vs. evil.
    Ron Paul appeals to Democrats, Republicans, and the Independent vote.

    • Al

      Agreed… Obama without a teleprompter and having to discuss real issues would be disastrous for him…
      Ron Paul could beat him in a real debate…

      • Bonnie

        The media is controlled by this administration. I wonder if anyone has ever thought that the reason Ron Paul is attacked so much is because he is the very one Obama doesn’t want to run against in the general election?

        I really believe the reason Mitt and Newt have been the darlings of the media is because they are under orders to do so! Obama knows he can defeat either one of them, just as he defeated McCain. McCain was NOT the peoples choice for the nomination in 2008. He was GIVEN to us by the GOP which is nothing more or less than the other arm of the Democratic party. If people were really educated, they would know this.

        • Sumerian Man

          Absolutely! Congrats to you, Jason Burns, 57 Girl, Orrie, and the many others on this blog and some others who do their best to espouse the truth about Ron Paul and true strengths and policies he brings to the table, and has for over 30 years. Looks like the silent majority is finally starting to rumble. To bad we couldn’t get at least this far last election, it could of saved us 4 trillion dollars and possibly restored our beloved Constitution and personal freedoms (and thousands of lives) by now. We can’t give up, we must keep trying to flip the switch and turn on the light for those who still can’t see through all the dark deceptions out there. With perserverence, knowledge, Gods help, prayer, and a whole lot of typing, we may just get through to these voters that like him or not, Ron Paul is the only candidate who can turn the tide of our government inflicted, self destruction. Peace to all and a very merry (Christ)mas! He is the reason for the season.

          • Sumerian Man

            Sorry, didn’t mean to leave you out Bonnie – your tops!

        • http://JohnGalt.Princeton@gmail.com John Galt

          The media attacks on Governor Sara Palin have been unprecedented in my experience of observing the political scene. Paul’s have been light in comparison.

  • Al

    Its been nice to see a diverse group on here both for and against Ron Paul. It seems to be that a majority against Paul seem to simply state he’s a “Kook” or an “Isolationist” with nothing to really backup their claims other than that’s what they believe.
    I’d really try to understand the views of the opposition of Paul, but have difficulty finding logic in their thinking when they don’t offer up any real solutions from their own candidates…

    • Bonnie

      They throw “kook” around because it’s what the media does all the time. If people would just listen to him, THINK FOR THEMSELVES, and pray (if they are really Christians), they would be surprised to know how intelligent and wise Dr. Paul is.

      For those who love to say “He is too old”, I would challenge them to ride 20 miles in blistering heat someday and then tell us, “He’s too old!” They would be left in his dust at the starting line! Let’s see if there are any “takers” to his challenge! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPlUnnKLYJk

  • Johnny American

    The peoples need to look at Romney and Gingrich They are copies of obama just a different color but the same too take and destory the USA and give the illegals free citizenship but useing a different name for its these two are not what we need to put in the whitehouse any other of the rest be 100% better than those two and obama .So do not let these three pull the wool are put a smoke screen up just telling and letting you see what you want to hear and see

  • William

    I for one am so sick of all you whiny-ass “Christian” hypocrites. Pissing and moaning “Ron Paul does not have christian values”, “He wants Iran to have a nuke”, “He’s gonna get us all killed”.

    STFU!!!!

    It’s seems all of you chickens#$% Christian Falseclaimers are the ones who lack Christian values. You have no faith your faith in your Deity but would instead puy your faith in the abilities of men?” psalms 23

    The Lord is my Shepherd; I shall not want.
    He maketh me to lie down in green pastures:
    He leadeth me beside the still waters.
    He restoreth my soul:
    He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for His name’ sake.

    Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
    I will fear no evil: For thou art with me;
    Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me.
    Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies;
    Thou annointest my head with oil; My cup runneth over.

    Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life,
    and I will dwell in the House of the Lord forever.”?

    psalms 23

    You all cry out for the destruction of any nation which opposes you and your pathetic belief systems. According to the scriptures of your own religion, your actions insure your destruction.

    The Golden Rule
    “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.”
    — Matthew 7:12

    F@#$%^& Hypocrites!!!!!!!!!

    • William

      “Yet, you would condemn the one candidate calling for Peace”. If it’s war you desire then may GOD in heaven grant your wish. And as your nation burns and your cities lay in ruin and your society fails, may you all come to experience the wrath your GOD as he unleashes the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse from the “Book of Revelation”.

      I watched as the Lamb opened the first of the seven seals. Then I heard one of the four living creatures say in a voice like thunder, “Come and see!” I looked, and there before me was a white horse! Its rider held a bow, and he was given a crown, and he rode out as a conqueror bent on conquest.
      — Revelation 6:1-2

      When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, “Come and see!” Then another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make men slay each other. To him was given a large sword.

      — Revelation 6:3-4

      When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come and see!” I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, “A quart of wheat for a day’s wages, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!”
      — Revelation 6:5-6

      When the Lamb opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature say, “Come and see!” I looked and there before me was a pale horse! Its rider was named Death, and Hades was following close behind him. They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine and plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth.
      — Revelation 6:7-8

      “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour” Exodus 20:16

      yet your government made lies of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” to garner your support for invasion and murder.

      “Thou Shall not murder” Exodus 20:13

      Yet you praise and support your government for sending soldiers to kill the peoples of foreign lands.

      “Thou shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour.
      Exodus 20:17

      Yet you support a government who desires the resources of another land and you willing turn a blind eye in the name of Security.

      “Oh, Please keep us safe. Please, Please.”

      But the continuance of the GODless policies of this nation will not bring you safety, but instead will bring you more danger.

      “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Acts 2:38

      Return to GOD’s laws Christian nation or perish in disobedience.

      “For the wages of sin is Death” Romans 6:23

  • Bonnie

    Is Ron Paul Wrong About Iran?

    What is more likely? Circa 2003:

    That Iraq has WMDs and poses a great threat to the United States?

    Or what Ron Paul said—that America was overreacting and we would find ourselves in a quagmire?

    In 2003, everyone said Ron Paul was wrong. In 2011, most Americans agree that Paul was right.

    What is more likely? Circa 2011:

    That Iran might have a WMD and poses a great threat to the United States?

    Or what Ron Paul says—that America is overreacting concerning Iran and going to war with that country will find the US in a quagmire once again?

    The notion that Paul is being “absurd” in his policy toward Iran does not make sense if history, experience and common sense have any bearing on the matter.

  • William

    “Yet, you would condemn the one candidate calling for Peace”. If it’s war you desire then may GOD in heaven grant your wish. And as your nation burns and your cities lay in ruin and your society fails, may you all come to experience the wrath your GOD as he unleashes the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse from the “Book of Revelation”.

    I watched as the Lamb opened the first of the seven seals. Then I heard one of the four living creatures say in a voice like thunder, “Come and see!” I looked, and there before me was a white horse! Its rider held a bow, and he was given a crown, and he rode out as a conqueror bent on conquest.
    — Revelation 6:1-2

    When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, “Come and see!” Then another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make men slay each other. To him was given a large sword.

    — Revelation 6:3-4

    When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come and see!” I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, “A quart of wheat for a day’s wages, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!”
    — Revelation 6:5-6

    When the Lamb opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature say, “Come and see!” I looked and there before me was a pale horse! Its rider was named Death, and Hades was following close behind him. They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine and plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth.
    — Revelation 6:7-8

    “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour” Exodus 20:16

    yet your government made lies of “Weapons of Mass Destruction” to garner your support for invasion and murder.

    “Thou Shall not murder” Exodus 20:13

    Yet you praise and support your government for sending soldiers to kill the peoples of foreign lands.

    “Thou shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour.
    Exodus 20:17

    Yet you support a government who desires the resources of another land and you willing turn a blind eye in the name of Security.

    “Oh, Please keep us safe. Please, Please.”

    But the continuance of the GODless policies of this nation will not bring you safety, but instead will bring you more danger.

    “Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.” Acts 2:38

    Return to GOD’s laws Christian nation or perish in disobedience.

    “For the wages of sin is Death” Romans 6:23

  • Bonnie

    Nanette, please explain to everyone exactly what an “isolationist” is? I’m not sure you know what that means. Also, please provide the documentation that PROVES it. I may decide to help you as I don’t believe you’ll take the effort because you really don’t care. Am I right? But I’ll do the legwork for you just so others will know you have no idea what you’re talking about. So the difference between you blasting Ron Paul stating things that nowhere come close to being the truth, and me proving beyond a shadow of doubt that you either LIE or don’t know what you’re talking about will be clearly laid bare.

  • Bonnie

    LIE:
    Ron Paul is an isolationist.

    TRUTH:
    Ron Paul is not an isolationist, but a non-interventionist.

    Calling Dr. Paul an isolationist comes from simply not understanding the significant differences between isolationism and non-interventionism, mainly, with the issue of trade.

    Isolationism is the doctrine of completely isolating our country from the affairs of other nations, and focusing exclusively on the growth of our own country. Non-interventionism on the hand promotes trading with other nations, as a means to build good diplomatic relations, and for the betterment of all parties involved. Furthermore, it doesn’t rule out using military force as an option, but proponents feel that it should only be used as a last option, to come to the defense of an ally under attack, or more importantly, to defend our own country if under attack, or directly threatened by attack. Lastly, taking such military action as a last resort should only be done with the advice and support of the Congress. This policy is in sharp contrast to interventionism propagated by neoconservatives, which promotes upholding UN resolutions, overthrowing governments and replacing them ones of our own choosing, and other actions not related to our own direct security. In short, it promotes our country “policing the word”, which puts a hardship on the American people with the draining of resources and more importantly the loss of life, not to mention goes directly against the ideas of freedom of liberty. It’s hypocritical.
    In this interview on CNN, Dr. Paul discusses the importance of non-interventionism.http://slander.revolutioni.st/isolationist.html

  • Bonnie

    Ahmadinejad DID NOT threaten to “wipe Israel off the map.”
    http://www.youtube.com
    This is the truth of the lies the media have shown you about the Iranian President. http://​representativepress.blogspot.co​m/2007/02/​iranian-president-ahmadin

  • Larry W.

    It is easy to see that Obama loves his agenda more than America. The same can be said for Ron Paul, or perhaps it is really Rahm Paul. Iran’s president is willing to sacrifice his own peaceful people to kill as many Jews and Americans as possible, then point his finger at America for waging the war.

    The difference between Ron Paul and levelheaded Americans is that when a fist is about to hit my nose, I don’t try to pretend that its just imaginary. Dr. Paul, if I were you I would seek out a good doctor for yourself.

  • chris

    ima lifetime democrat who discovered ron paul 4 years ago and now am a registered republican i will not vote for anyone other then ron paul gop you have been warned nominate ron paul or have 4 more years of obama and dont try and guilt trip me into supporting your obama clone newt romney i see obama newt and romney as identical so i wont vote for them and obama will crush your clone ) then you will only have yourselves to blame )

  • dfrank

    Perhaps one of you modern day philosophers who keep reminding us that the lesser of two evils is still an evil will tell us about the time you voted for someone who was not somewhat evil. That will take some thought, of course; something most of you seem reluctant to do.

    To save some time, let me suggest a test for you guys: Suppose you had a way of knowing, for an absolute certainty, that candidate ‘A’ would just take all of your money; and, candidate ‘B’ would take all your money and then set fire to your house. Would you still be unable to choose candidate ‘A’ over candidate ‘B’?

    If that song and dance is all you have to offer, please just go away and let others do the deciding.

  • Tejano Jack

    Mr. Gingrich COMPLETED the Gun Owners of America (GOA), very issue specific SURVEY on
    9 December 2011.

    Newt is 100%, A+, and deserves the vote of all gun owners. He supports all of our issues and has a long record of doing so. Please read the letter to me, below, from
    Mr. Gingrich, and refer to the following link to see his completed survey:

    http://www.newt.org/sites/newt.org/files/images/GOASurveyPDF.pdf

    Clearly, Mr. Gingrich continues his life-long, unequivocal support of the 2d Amendment and Gun Rights. There have been some questions raised by GOA concerning Newt’s support and they have now been resolved.

    Regards to all and SPREAD THE WORD!. V/r, Tejano Jack

    Newt’s letter to me:

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

    So glad you contacted us on this important issue and allowing us to get you an answer.

    Newt is a strong defender of the Second Amendment. Newt has been a committed and vigilant defender gun rights since first being elected by the people of Georgia’s Sixth District in 1978. He ofter cites the fact that the Second Amendment acknowledges a right that pre-dates the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Notice what it says, “shall not be infringed.” That means the right was already well established but the Founders’ wanted to ensure that no government can take away from you the rights which God has given you.

    Newt did answer the Gun Owners’ survey and you can find it here:
    http://www.newt.org/sites/newt.org/files/images/GOASurveyPDF.pdf
    Newt is a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, and speaks regularly at the NRA’s Annual Meeting. He received an A or A-plus rating from the NRA all ten terms that he served in the House of Representatives, and received the NRA’s Defender of the Second Amendment award in 2010. You can watch his 2011 speech to the NRA here.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_aMNzrPovu8

    Newt also will have a pro-active Second Amendment agenda as President. He will:
    • Instruct the Department of Justice and State Department to defend American sovereignty and block all international treaties that infringe on Second Amendment rights.
    • Take immediate steps to decisively control the border so Mexican drug cartels are blocked from entering the United States.
    • End all illegal gun exports to Mexico by the federal government.
    • End the discriminatory treatment of firearms imports. If a gun can be legally made and sold in the United States, it should be importable from outside the United States.

  • fred

    OMG! If Ron Paul wins then all those neo-con closet liberals who run the GOP become irrelevant! How can this be happening??!!

    • Sumerian Man

      You said it Fred!