Obama Considers Becoming National Landlord

Just beware of PAID PREACHERS

Great sermon, ….but, …. this has what to do with Obama taking over the rental market in the US???

gramosjr7

What does the phrase “God manifest in the flesh” mean? Either Jesus Christ was Heavenly Father’s son or he wasn’t. If he was His Son, which I know he was, then it means God the Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ, His Son are two separate beings. That is what the Bible says.

The reason people get that mixed up is because the belief or doctrine that is taught came out of the Council of Nicea in about 325AD and not everyone supported it but the Emperor Constantine said he wanted one doctrine being taught and he didn’t care what it was. He just wanted one doctrine. So the mostly Catholic bishops argued for several weeks about what the correct doctrine was and then voted on it. No revelation. No spirit. No power of prayer. Just a vote. And they couldn’t even vote for what the Bible teaches. The Godhead consists of three individual beings in God the Father, His Son Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost. Three beings but One doctrine.

It seems you left off a couple steps the scriptures clearly teach one must do before reaching the point of salvation.

Did I miss something here? How did you escape from the revival tent?
I thought the subject matter at hand was oVomit becoming ‘the national landlord,’ so you seem to be woefully out of topic!
Go preach to the heathens on the DailyKos… they need it a lot more than the visitors here since most are evangelicals already.

Just one teeny weeny correction: Jesus suffered for our sins in the Garden of Gethsemane the night before he died on the cross. He bled from every pore and suffered unbelievable pain and agony, so much so that he prayed for relief and Heavenly Father sent him angels to comfort him. After than insufferable agony, the pain of the cross was a ‘cakewalk’ by comparison. If we REPENT of our sins, then we partake of Jesus’ suffering for them in our place. If, however, we refuse to repent of our sins, then we cause Jesus to have suffered in vain. How sad and horrible that He would offer himself up willingly as a sacrifice for us and then we repay His wonderful goodness by taking part in the most degrading, subhuman behavior, in killing our unborn, killing each other in anger or spite, hating one another and all other actions that prove us to be less than worthy of his great love for us. And yet he continues to love us, no matter what. How he must weep over what is happening among his brothers and sisters on earth today. No wonder Heavenly Father turns away rather than watch us hate and destroy ourselves. But Jesus continues to watch over us with love and hope that our goodness will overcome our weaknesses and bad behavior. That is what he agreed to do for us and he will never let US down. Will we let HIM down????

Psalms 8:3 When I consider your heavens,
the work of your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which you have set in place,
4 what is mankind that you are mindful of them,
human beings that you care for them?

Amen! God loves us so much that He made a way of escape from a just punishment from our sins. The enemy has no claim to them who are washed in the blood of Jesus Christ. He loves you so much that He was literally dieing to be with you forever.

THE MISUSE OF THE WORDS, “ALL”, “EVERY”, “WHOSOEVER’, ETC.
By: Arnold Kennedy aekennedy@xtra.co.nz
INTRODUCTION.
Great stress is placed by preachers upon the words, “all”, “every” and “whosoever” in verses
such as, “Go ye into all the world”, “Preach the Gospel to every creature” and so on. These present
a false application of Scripture simply because such words and phrases are wrongly used. This
misuse of these words has to be considered.
This false application contradicts Jesus’ statement and instruction to His disciples:
Matt. 15:24, “But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house
of Israel”, and
Matt. 10:6 “Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans
enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”
Because of this contradiction we need to find out why this appears to be so, and why the
popular interpretation about going to all races contradicts this statement and this command of Jesus.
There are different words translated as “all”, “every” etc. in both Hebrew and Greek, and so
we need to investigate those that are misused to promote forms of universalism. In the New
Testament, the Greek word holos is used as “the whole”, whereas the more frequently used word
pas is used to indicate “a part” as being all of either a greater or a lesser part. It is the making of
pas to have the same meaning as holos that causes the error. Where translators have so often
translated pas as “all”, “every” or “whosoever”, it means “all of that part”, or “every one of that
part”, or “whosoever of that part”. The word, “whosoever” is frequently translated from the word
pas that is also translated as “all”. We will see that any untaught person who says, “Where my
Bible says “whosoever will may come”, it means “any person of any race”, that person is either
untaught or is misled.
So we have to answer the main question, “does “all” usually mean “all of everything”
or “all of that part being spoken about only”. Does “all the world” mean the people in the entire
planet, or just all of those people in that part of the planet being spoken about? We will see that
there is a weight of Scripture that shows that words such as “all” are strictly confined to “all” of
each context only. In simple terms, “all the world” is better put as, “all that world”, thus excluding
every other world = kosmos.
The words for “all”, “every”, “whosoever” etc. are often singular, NOT plural. Thus they refer to:
“all” the one [group],
or “the whole” of the class,
or “the entire” of the class.
To grasp the use of this particular “all” in Greek and Hebrew, consider:
Deut 28:10: “And ALL the peoples of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name
of Jehovah, and they shall be afraid of you”.
Here, “all the peoples of the earth” does NOT include Israel. In the same way, “go ye into all the
world” is NOT inclusive of every race. Failure to understand this is the source of error in the
modern popular evangelical teaching. Because of the importance of this matter, any person seeking
truth can look through a concordance (Young’s is easiest) to satisfy themselves as to the right
application of this word “pas” that is translated as “all” etc.. Some examples are given further on to
show how to do this.
Jesus says that it is not given for everyone to hear or to understand. Speaking to His
disciples about the Edomite leadership of the Judean nation He said, “Because it is given wito you to
understand the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given”-[Matt. 13:1 1 ].
2
Immediately we have just one exception like this, then “every” and “all” cannot include that
exception, or the other exceptions. If an exception is made about the Edomites who cannot find
repentance, or of those borm as tares about which Jesus said, “Leave them alone”, then these cannot
be part of the “all” being addressed. Jesus did not preach to certain peoples, as we have seen. Jesus
said He was sent to Israel and to save “His people” from their sins. Are we to be wiser than Jesus?
When we consider the volume of Scriptures detailing the exclusiveness of Israel, if we had no
mind-set or previous pre-conditioning, we would have to agree to the following:
1. They are all consistent statements of fact, [not inferences].
2. They all relate to Israel alone, as a race, no other race being included.
3. Israel alone is God’s inheritance, as is stated.
4. There is no conflict about redemption applying to Israel alone.
5. That certain covenants and promises referred to were made only with Israel.
6. That Israel is a holy, i.e.set-apart, race -[What is commonly called The Chosen Race].
7. That the Statutes [choq] and the Judgements [mishpat] were given to Israel alone as a
servant nation.
8. That the word “Jews” is not mentioned in any of these Scriptures.
9. That there are different ‘seeds”, and that Abraham’s seed is genetic.
10. That none of these Scriptures can be ‘spiritualised’.
If we come to this conclusion about a unique Israel racially, there will immediately be a
dilemma between:
[a] What the Scripture teaches in direct statements showing the exclusiveness of Israel through both
Testaments.
[b] What is inferred from indirect verses as used by universalists. Universalists may use what
appear to be direct statements, but there are certain words that have been given new meanings and
tenses. Sometimes completely wrong and deceptive meanings have been placed on words and some
of these have become accepted modern teachings. To these manufactured word meanings, “types”
are added to fit the interpretation. This is the common way of teaching, but this is not teaching that
is based upon the Cornerstone or the given foundation of the Law, the Psalms and the Prophets -
(Eph. 2:20).
[c] What we think we see manifest in terms of Christian experience in other races- Both psychology
and deliverance from demonic activity, and protection whilst other races are amongst Israel, have
application here. But, redemption can only apply to Israel.
Now we can look further into some individual verses, and words in those verses.
“EVERY CREATURE”.
As said above, Mark 16:15 is misused in that it appears to be saying that the Gospel is for
every race. Which “world” were the disciples to go into? This is a fair question. When the
disciples were sent to the lost sheep of the House OF ISRAEL, to whom and to which “world” were
they sent? When Jesus said in Matthew 15:24: I am not sent BUT unto the lost sheep of the House
of Israel, to what race was He sent? Are we to say Jesus was wrong and that He was sent to every
race? Are we to say Jesus was wrong in sending His disciples only to Israelites? If they were told
go ye into all the world, why did they not go to the Negroes, the Chinese or the Indians? Why did
they choose only one direction and proceeded to where the Children of Israel were? The location of
the House of Israel at that time can be easily established historically.
Matt 11:1 … he departed thence to preach in their [the disciples’] cities.
Matt 10:5-7 Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter
ye not: but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach
(proclaim), saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
3
The disciples were instructed specifically not to go to certain peoples. The disciples of Jesus went
out from Galilee knowing exactly where to find these “lost” sheep. They were not so “lost” that
they could not be found!
“ALL”, “EVERY ONE”, “WHO-SO-EVER”, ETC.
Consider again these two verses:
John 3:16 God so loved the world …
Mark 16:15 Go ye into all the world …
Such verses are the basis of the thought that the go and preach the gospel to every creature
of Mark 16:15 refers to going to every person of every race on earth. Let us consider some of the
words in these verses.
Preach or kerusso means to proclaim, or to announce good news like a town crier. It does
not mean “to make disciples” or “to evangelise”, as many teach. But where were they to make their
proclamations? Was it to everyone of every race? Let us look at every creature. The Greek word
ktisis is given by:
Strong G2936-7 as “original formation, building, creature, and ordinance”.
Vine’s Dictionary of New Testament Words: “Ktizo is used among the Greeks to mean the
foundation of a place, a city, or a colony … It is a significant confirmation of
Rom 1:20,21 that in all non-Christian Greek literature these words (ktizo and its derivatives)
are never used by Greeks to convey the idea of a Creator or of a creative act by any of their
gods. The words are confined by them to the acts of human beings.
This is the creature [or rather, creation] of Mark 16:15. The word ktisis in the Greek is used
to indicate the product of human building or formation. In this context it refers to a village, or place
where people live. A ktisis is built by man, not God. The disciples were to go specifically to the
places or the villages or places where the Israelites lived.
Matt 10:23 Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, til the Son of Man be come.
We cannot make “the cities of Israel” mean the cities of every race. Note here that Jesus is
speaking of the time of the end.
What is the area of proclamation? Is it not all the world of Israel?
What were they proclaiming? Was it not the Gospel of the Kingdom?
The Kingdom is what Jesus and John the Baptist came proclaiming repent: for the kingdom of
heaven is at hand. Who proclaims either of these today? It is impossible to believe and teach both
the modern universal gospel to all races and the exclusive Kingdom of Heaven at the same time.
Jesus confines all the world to the cities of Israel! In other words, this is what is to be proclaimed
in the dwellings or places where the Israelites live right up to the end of the age.
ARE “ALL” and “EVERY” LIMITED EXPRESSIONS?
Does “all” usually mean “all of everything” or “all of that part being spoken about”? Does all the
world mean all the planet, or just all of that part of the planet being spoken about. A look through
Young’s Analytical Concordance will show how these words are used. This will give an indication
without having to go into the Greek. Being certain on this topic is well worth the time involved
researching lexicons to determine the correct meanings of the words used.
To grasp the use of all in Greek and Hebrew, consider Deut 28:10, “ and all the people of
the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord, and they shall be afraid of thee”.
Here, all the peoples of the earth does NOT include Israel. In the same way, go ye into all the
world is NOT inclusive of every race. Failure to understand this is the source of error in the modern
popular teaching. Jesus says that it is not given for everyone to hear or to understand. Immediately
we have just one exception, then “every” and “all” cannot include that exception, or the other
4
exceptions. If an exception is made about the Edomites who cannot find repentance, or of those
Jesus said, leave them alone, then these cannot be part of the “all” being addressed. Jesus did not
proclaim to certain peoples, as we have seen. Jesus said He was sent to Israel to save His people
from their sins. Are we to be wiser than Jesus?
“ALL THE ENDS OF THE Earth”
Isaiah 45:22 “Look unto me and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth”.
At first glance, this appears to have a universal meaning. The word translated as the earth is
the Hebrew word “erets” which is mostly translated as “country” or “earth” in the sense of a
localised area or that earth belonging to a people [for example, the land, or earth, of Israel]. In
context, this whole chapter is about Israel and no other. It certainly is not used in the generalised
sense as the universalists who try to prove the expression the ends of the earth means every race or
place on Earth.
“IN THEE SHALL ALL NATIONS BE BLESSED”
Gal 3:7-9 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of
Abraham. And the scripture foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith,
preached (proclaimed) before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, in thee shall all nations be
blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
This verse together with and the verses below, are favoured by universalists because they seem to
present a universal gospel for all races. “Nations” is sometimes translated emotively as “Heathen”
to try to add weight to the universal argument. To understand any passage of Scripture it is
necessary to look at it as a whole by going back to the prophecy behind it to see what it is fulfilling.
[a] To Abraham:
Gen 12:2,3 And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy
name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: and I will bless them that bless thee, and will
curse him that curseth thee, and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Gen 18:18 Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and a mighty nation, and
all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him?
Gen 22:18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou
hast obeyed my voice.
[b] To Isaac:
Gen 26:3 Sojourn in this land, and I will be with three, and will bless thee; for unto
thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath that I
sware unto Abraham thy father.
[c] To Jacob:
Gen 28:14 And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad
to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed
shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
[d] To Jabob/Israel in the Psalms:
Psalm 22:27 All the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto the Lord: and all the
kindreds of the nations shall worship before thee.
Here are six important verses that are used to support the doctrine of universal racial salvation.
Indeed, they do appear to give valid support on the surface. But do they actually say what the
religious translators make them say? Is this the problem here? Let us look further.
THE “FAMILIES OF THE EARTH” BEING BLESSED IN ABRAHAM
5
The major source of error in these blessing passages is what we mean by certain words. We
have different words translated as earth and the ground, countries and the land, as also occurs with
the words translated nations, families and kindreds. Although an extensive technical Hebrew
language exposition is beyond the scope of this paper, there are things that need to be pointed out.
Originally Abraham was told to go from his father’s house unto an eretz that God would
show him. If eretz here is the whole Earth, then Abraham must have gone to another planet!
Abraham was told all The ‘Earth’ which thou seeth, I will give thee. He was told to arise and walk
through the earth. Did he walk across the whole globe? So we have to ask if this ‘earth’ is the
whole earth or the Promised Land. It is not all the ‘eretzs of all the races on earth. Abraham was
told to get himself out of his present earth and to go to THE earth. There are many references that
give confirmation of the meaning. THE earth does not mean the whole globe, but rather that
portion belonging to the particular area or person under consideration.
Contrary to popular presentation, we must note that in Genesis 12:3, the ‘them’ in “I will
bless them” is plural, whereas the ‘him’ in I will curse him is singular. The Hebrew allows for two
possible translations of be blessed, namely:
[1] “May be blessed in, or by, association with thee”, and
[2] “May bless themselves” [as the RV footnote says].
Some awkward questions could be posed here if it was to be taken that all nations had the meaning
of “every race on earth”:
1. If those who curse Abraham are cursed, how could those so cursed be part of all nations
which were to be blessed?
2. Were the Egyptians blessed or cursed through Israel’s presence during their captivity and
also in the Exodus?
3. When the Children of Israel went into the Promised Land, they were told to exterminate all
the Canaanite nations. Was not that an unusual way of blessing the Canaanites? After all,
they were supposed to be part of all nations. Likewise Amalek was to be exterminated.
4. In Deut 23:6, God commanded Israel that they should not seek the peace or the prosperity of
the Ammonites and the Moabites right up to the end of the age. Ezra 9:12 indicates similar
treatment of the non-Israelites in the land. This is hardly a blessing on those nations, is it?
5. When The House of Judah was in captivity in Babylon, is there any evidence of Israel being
a blessing to Babylon?
6. When the House of Israel was in captivity in Assyria, did this make the Assyrians blossom?
7. In prophecy why are all the forecasts concerning non-Israel nations always detailing them as
being servants to Israel and for them to perish if they refuse this destiny? This is so right up
to the end of the age.
The promise to Abraham was to “ALL” nations without any exceptions. “All” cannot include those
who are cursed and those God says that He hates. Hence “all” means all the nations of Israel.
Throughout Scripture, Israel was to dwell alone and shall not be reckoned among the
nations [Num 23:9]. Prophecy sustains this to the end.
Daniel 7:27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the
whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is
an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve him.
Isaiah 60:12 For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those
nations shall be utterly wasted.
Zech 14:16,17 And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which
came up against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord
of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. And it shall be that whoso will not come up of
6
all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, even
upon them shall be no rain.
Israel and Judah were scattered among all nations, but are these other nations to be blessed?
Jeremiah does not agree.
Jer 30:11 … though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet I
will not make a full end of thee …
Jeremiah repeats this in Jer 46:28, addressing this to Jacob. In all these Scriptures we can see the
unique place of Israel among the other nations. This continues after Jesus returns and Israel reigns
with God over the other nations. Finally there will be no more death. What a blessing! The
blessing is either given by this seed, or by the Act of God.
Quoting Lloyd Palmer of the USA on these words:
“Whosever” is an objective pronoun. According to the Oxford English Dictionary,
“objective” means: “dealing with outward things or exhibiting facts uncolored by feelings or
opinions; not subjective.” As an adjective, “whosoever” is used to modify and convey a, “fair,
impartial, equitable, neutral, open-minded and unprejudiced” meaning to a noun.
In contrast, a subjective pronoun, according to Oxford, means: (of art, literature, written
history, a person’s view, etc) “proceeding from personal idiosyncrasy or individuality; not
impartial or literal.” Now that we have examined the differences in “objective” and “subjective,”
which one of the two is in harmony with Scripture?
Jesus told His disciples, “Ye have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you and ordained
you…”(John 15:16). This is a subjective statement, and not an objective one. This becomes a matter
of doctrine. Do you follow the “people choosing God” notion, or do you surrender to the scriptural
“people chosen of God” doctrine? Your answer will determine whether you think the word
“whosoever” applies to anyone who confesses Christ (the people choosing God notion), or whether
you embrace the revealed, “people chosen of God doctrine.”
Allow me to ask this question: If all that a person has to do is “confess” Jesus as his personal
Saviour, which is the doctrine of most Judeo-Christian churches, then why did Jesus say these
words:
“Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but
he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day,
Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And
in thy name done many wonderful works? And then I will profess unto them, I never knew
you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.”(Matt.7:21-23)
These words are strong ones, but they reveal that not every one who “confesses” Christ will be
saved!
Universalists love to quote John 3:15-16 to claim that “whosoever” as it is used in these
verses, applies to all ethnic groups. When we look up the Greek word that “whosoever” was
translated from, we discover something unusual. The word is No. 3588 in Strong’s Greek
Dictionary. It is actually three words in Greek: “ho, he, to, in all their inflection; the definite article;
the (sometimes to be supplied, at others, omitted in English idiom): the, this, that, one, he, she, it,
etc.” The list is all subjective words. None of the words could be considered as objective.
In other words, “he”, “she”, and “it”, etc, are subjective pronouns. Subjective pronouns are
exclusive. Therefore, the catch-all word “whosoever” is a misleading word to use, because it totally
changes the inflection.
7
I suggest that a corrected phrase be used in place of the word “whosoever.” The phrase
“those who” doesn’t destroy the “people chosen of God” doctrine of the Bible. For example, lets
delete “whosoever” and apply “those who” in those two verses of John 3:15-16:
“That those who believe in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved
the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that those who believe in Him should not
perish, but have everlasting life.”
Now it becomes far less inclusive when properly translated and removes the concept that
Jesus was speaking generally as many are inclined to see. So the next time you read Scripture and
come upon the word “whosoever,” try substituting “those who” and see if it doesn’t make for better
Bible exegesis. When you understand the “people chosen of God” doctrine, you will also
comprehend that our English translators chose of “whosoever’ was a bad choice that led to the
Universalist’s mistaken assumption that Jesus was speaking to all groups on an equal basis”.
(End Quote).
EXAMPLES WHERE WE FIND THE WORD “ALL” THAT ARE NOT ALL INCLUSIVE.
Matt. 2:3 When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and ALL
Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered ALL the chief priests and scribes of the
people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.
The word “all” is found twice in this passage, and “all Jerusalem” has the context of “all the chief
priests and scribes”. King Herod would not be demanding where the Christ would be born of a
woman giving birth, neither would such a woman be troubled. Thus it does not include “all” of the
other people in the city, and to say that every person in every situation was troubled would
obviously be not true.
Matt. 3:5 Then went out to him Jerusalem, and ALL Judaea, and ALL the region round
about Jordan, And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins.
Again the word “all” appears twice. Very obviously John the Baptist could not have baptised every
person in Jerusalem, or indeed every person in “all Judea”. Thus “all” refers to that part who came
from those locations, and not anyone else who stayed home. Also, it did not include the High Priest
and the Roman garrison.
Matt. 27:24 When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was
made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of
the blood of this just person: see ye to it. Then answered ALL the people, and said, His
blood be on us, and on our children.
Perceptibly, “all the people” means that part of the people who were present before Pilate, and does
not include anyone else.
Mark 7:14 And when he had called all the people unto him, he said unto them, Hearken unto
me EVERY ONE of you, and understand:
Here, “all the people” does not include the Scribes and Pharisees Jesus had been talking to
immediately before this, and “all” has the meaning of all those others then present, as does “every
one of you”.
Acts 3:9, And ALL THE PEOPLE saw him walking and praising God: And they knew that
it was he which sat for alms at the Beautiful gate of the temple: and they were filled with
wonder and amazement at that which had happened unto him. And as the lame man which
was healed held Peter and John, ALL THE PEOPLE ran together unto them in the porch
that is called Solomon’s, greatly wondering.
Again, “all the people” that occurs twice in this passage can only refer to that part of “all the
people” who were present.
8
There is a Scripture in Rev. 13:7, which is taken totally out of context, and used by many
preachers to deceive mankind, and bring great fear upon them. That verse says (speaking of the
anti-christ), “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and
power was given him over ALL KINDREDS AND TONGUES, AND NATIONS.”
And the next verse says, “And ALL that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are
not written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world”.
Thus “all kindreds” does not include those whose names are written in the Book of Life. False
preachers point to the word “all” in verse 7, and again in verse 8, without giving consideration to the
context itself. There are many, many times throughout the Bible when the word “all” is put for “a
part”, even in the same way that we use the word in our every day life. Often we use terms such as
“everybody in town was at the meeting”, or “the water was all over the place”, and so forth.
In Genesis. 6, when God was talking about bringing a flood upon the Earth in verse 13, God
said, “The end of ALL FLESH is come before Me.” Then in verse 17, God said, “In Genesis 6:17,
“And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy ALL FLESH, wherein
is the breath of life, from under heaven; and EVERYTHING that is in the earth shall die”, we
know that Noah did not die as part of “all flesh”. Again, “all” is being used with the meaning of “a
part” or “the greater part.
In Joshua 6:21, “And they utterly destroyed ALL THAT WAS IN THE CITY, both man and
woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword”, we know that
Rahab was not part of “all” that was destroyed in that city.
In 1 Kings 11:16, “For six months did Joab remain there with all Israel, until he had cut off
EVERY MALE in Edom:) That Hadad fled, he and certain Edomites of his father’s servants with
him, to go into Egypt; Hadad being yet a little child”, did “every male” include male children? Did
“every male” include those Edomites who fled? If the entire Edomite male population on earth had
been slain, how could Edomites be found after this?
In Luke 2:1, “And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar
Augustus, that ALL THE WORLD should be taxed. (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius
was governor of Syria.) And ALL went to be taxed, every one into his own city”, we can see that
“all the world” has the meaning of “all that world”. This is how “all the world” is used in “Go ye
into all the (that) world and preach the Gospel”.
In Romans 1:8, “First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is
spoken of throughout THE WHOLE WORLD”, do we believe that “the whole world” included the
Chinese, the Maoris and the Aztecs?
In Rom. 10:18, “I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into ALL THE
EARTH, and their words unto THE ENDS OF THE WORLD. But I say, Did not Israel know”?,
again did “all the earth” and “the ends of the world” include say Australia, or was it confined to all
“that world” of the context, Israel?
In Col. 1:23, “If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from
the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached TO EVERY CREATURE
WHICH IS UNDER HEAVEN”, could “every creature under heaven” be extended beyond those
to whom Paul preached?
These are just a sample of verses that show how Scripture uses phrases, and if we use them
otherwise, we must come to wrong conclusions. These wrong conclusions then lead on wrong
evangelism and also to the interpretation of prophecy. Let us consider some of these.

all of obama’s actions/tactics come straight from the book of deceased chicago socialistic community organizer and communist fellow traveler, SAUL ALINSKY, to include change, narcissism, blaming, belittling, etc…. these and many others are not his ideas for action, they’re ALINSKY’S… he is a total ALINSKY disciple (hillary, too) to the extent he taught it, parrot and advocate, and has zero political ideas of his own… “The organizer,” alinsky wrote, “is in a true sense reaching for the highest level for which man can reach – to create, to be a ‘great creator,’ to play God.” … ah, yes, obama the ‘savior’… remember that??? see – http://discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2314 … this site will blow your mind… please send this info to all you know so we will all be able to make an informed vote in 2012

What dose this have to do with homes being given to muslims and blacks, they will get them under ovomits plan.

After you repent you must be baptized in {JESUS} ,s name for remission of your sins and then you shall received the {HOLY GHOST} with the evidence of speaking in tougues as the evidence that you have receive the gift and if not you have not been born again as the scriptcher has said in ACTS: 2:38

So I guess Jesus is gonna rent too?May be they got Mohamad to fix the plumbing. Or Budda as house chef…………Pie-Mouthed bible tump’n idiot…

obama

libereal thinktank???? = oxymoron

Them, the puppets will continue to come and go. Ten million, 20 million, 30 million, 40 million… Hello Sharia flag, for English please press 2!

http://www.reformdc.com
P.S. Did you vote this week at “you cut”? http://majorityleader.gov/YouCut/
They have removed the “and tell us what else to cut” link.

This will be his first step in taking over peoples land and property…

Technically we own all the nuclear weapons too.

How is President Obama trying to bring down those of us still paying our mortgage?

If anything, buying vacant properties would increase home values for the rest of us.

You’re right there brother!

I totally agree with you ! BUT – WHO is that someone going to be ? And HOW can we take the unearned paychecks away from those sorryass elected officials ? Lets face it – they know they have us by the gonads -which , by the way , is something they lack . If Republican politicians had any guts and loved this country , they would not cave in as they have done. The only brave men that I can think of are our Armed Forces who right now are risking their lives fighting the Islamists who despise us . Compare that true courage to our overpaid cowardly members of the congress of the US . I am ashamed of our government . Brave navy Seals were killed after THEY brought down that evil bastard , osama bin ladin . They were betrayed by our braggart bastard president who will do anything to be reelected so that he finish destroying our country .
I dont care WHAT it takes to unseat BO ! I am all for it- whatever it is .

Good Idea he does not have a valid birth certificate and I don’t think he has citizenship papers so at leased he would have some legal papers.

Treason, he is guilty of going against the Constitution just by declaring war on Lybia. All of Congress is at fault for not calling him on that at this point.

Unfortunately Dan, your thinking sounds unreasonably accurate…another oxymoron. Obama and his cohorts are in desperate campaign mode right now (actually always), and will do ANYTHING in order to obtain more votes, including steal, buy and fraudulently cheat his way to secure the next election.

Dan, you took the words right out of my mouth. I would bet my last pay check that this usurper and his cronies have plans for doing just that, put all the Obama kool-aid drinking low income blacks, hispanics, illegals in these forclosed homes rent free.

It’s called “buying their votes.” For those of you who were willing to answer all the questions about how many bedrooms you had, how many bathrooms, how many people live in your home, etc., when the census takers came knocking at your door, don’t be surprised if one day, when Obama becomes the first dictator of America, he sends one of his cronies to your house and orders you to share your home with some poor, disadvantaged, poor black or Hispanic families because you showed the census takers that you had some spare bedrooms and extra bathrooms that in Obama’s opinion you now needed to share with the less fortunate.

If was for reasons like this that I refused to give the census takers any information other than how many lived in my home when they came to my door. They came back two times to try to get me to answer questions about how many bedrooms, how many bath rooms I had in our home. I refused both times to answer them.

But be sure the illegals are illegal … but wait everyone but Holder has a don’t ask don’t tell; and, if the do tell … look the other way.

I second that

Have you ever noticed the “messiah” stays clear of Dallas?…lol

Carter is the vilage idiot, b-o is still running second. But he is much more destructive to the U.S.

May I correct you?

Obama is an international joke!

Ray … please also ask, who pays the heat, light, water, phone … etc?
A nun friend who was assigned to aid the south Chicago [at that time new] public housing asked me, of all people, how do you motivate these people?

Case in point was they even ripped out the toilets in one building.

In the 60′s I personally saw this disintegration in north central Milwaukee and South Chicago.

We continue to see all of these evil communistic strategies that the obama government is implementing,

At a rate faster than the slow cooking frog
In the soon to be boiling pot,
Yet, so far we have not thwarted his plot,
Hence, our goose is cooked in the boiling pot.

Can we afford to wait for the elections or is there something more concrete and significant that we can do? The temperature of the water is increasing but that frog doesn’t seem to be aware, at least not to a great enough extent to cause him to jump out of that boiling pot! Even if we do get obama out, there will still be a huge amount of undoing of the tragedy that he has forced upon our country.

Prices are low already, problem is people don’t have any money now that we have had styme us 1&2 and the banks and insurance co’s are flush with cash and now we have the grand default scare to sink this country even further down the pipes. In times of high inflation housing prices must go up. All these foreclosures have been gutted and nobody wants/can buy them since you need a bunch of cash to repair them. What needs to be done is break out the bulldozers since what we have is a supply and demand problem. Who in the heck does OB plan to rent these places to other than illegal immigrants and subsidizing the rents which of course will further destroy neighborhoods. I still see low income giveaway loans which is what caused this whole problem to begin with. When are these idiots ever going to learn or are they doing this on purpose?

Look up Presidential Orders / Executive orders. It is scary.

I’m afraid to…might make me postal…hahahahaha

Step up, Sonja. Do what you ask.

The appraisals were not necessarily fakes, but could have been done by incompetent appraisers. People are always looking for the appraiser that gives the highest value. These decisions on the appraisals of houses, should be set my the market (what like properties have sold for in recent months). When the economy goes bad, and people end up having properties repossessed, that usually means the properties sell for less, for there is more supply than demand. That means the next appraisals will drop in value, because the recent sale prices have dropped. No matter what value an owner, a bank, or an appraiser puts on a house it’s true value will no more than what someone is willing to take for it. The banks more than likely tanked because the banks were greedy and stretched their credit decisions to put someone in a home. These decisions were usually made because many people that are really not qualified financially to purchase a home, will pay for it in good times. The banks look back at the good times they’ve had and called those decisions good decisions, but when the economy tanks and those unqualified buyers that were put into a home cannot pay their bills, then the bank is looking at collection efforts and possibly foreclosures. Foreclosures may even take as long as nine months before they can get the buyers out, and if it is a federal bank, they must get rid of that non-performing asset (foreclosed home) during a certain period of time, according to federal regulations. As that deadline gets shorter and the fact that the home has probably deteriorated physically a great deal, the price they will sell the house gets smaller. People in the market are looking for bargains and the market for repo’s becomes greater than the market for other new or used homes, keeping the market values lower and in a slide. Other reasons that cannot be avoided can also cause properties to sell for less than they may even be truly valued. I think the biggest problem affecting repo’s of homes or increased collection activity, is the lender’s greed which causes him to stretch towards less stringent credit requirements, etc. and federal auditors tendency to overlook something that they shouldn’t have based on how good the market has been. In the long run the true value will come out based upon what the seller is willing to accept (including lenders holding foreclosed mortgages) and what the buyer is willing to pay. That is what the true value is.

He’s another Hugo Chavez.

C’mon Vern, tell us what you really think. It almost sounds like just because he supports all the muslim goodies, hates Christians and Jews, declares ramadan a ‘peoples holiday’ while supporting stopping public celebration of ANY other religous holiday, you think that maybe some of his muslim birth, & education may be slanting him slightly?? Where’d you ever come up with that???

Jim, federal regulations prevent banks from making mortgages to individuals who currently hold 6 or more mortgages. The rule was 10 or more, 4 years ago; 4 or more, 2 years ago. Private landlords are being cut out of the market, unless they’re wealthy enough to pay cash or can arrange a private contract. A U.S. Bank mortgage loan officer recently told me they receive regulatory changes 2-3 times a week now…the only certainty is uncertainty. Suspicious yet, that the tanking housing market is by design???

The globalists want to do that worldwide…they think communism will be okay if they just control everything and don’t have to compete with Capitalists….I have news for the…we are as ready to fight them now as our fathers, mothers and grandparents were…They may one day rule, but there will be nothing to rule….stupid phuques

Strange that when you do the same thing over and over, you keep getting the same results. The only thing this clown has done differently is to combine socialism with fascism. Sort of like a double whammy.
And this in what used to be the greatest FREE country in history..

I use to live in a very nice gated community for 55 and older. When people started losing their homes they destroyed them before they moved out. This was not the bank’s fault. This is wrong.

No sir, Jesus was absolutely not a socialist, nor did Jesus subscribe to any man-contrived government. Rather Jesus (and God in His Divinely inspired word, the BIBLE) state(d) things like (in paraphrased form): If people are unwilling to work, then neither let them eat…render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s and unto God, that which is God’s….Additionally, in the Old Testament book of 1 Kings, God tells us that the reason why we have a king (president, or other human leader) is because the sinful Jewish nation demanded one (against God’s will), because they wanted to be like the other nations. WELL, it looks like we are well on our way to fulfilling that latter statement. NOW, only God can truly get us out of this mess that we so willingly got ourselves into, and it will only happen if we humble ourselves to HIM and beseech His forgiveness.

It seems that you can’t read. He has stated his beliefs more than once, Denis. He is most certaily a radical in the Alinsky mold and has performed just as his idol prescribes. My friend, the losses suffered in the housing/mortgage collapse could not be recovered in a thousand years.

There is, it’s in the Constitution, you know that old
piece of paper that is being dismissed as irrelivent?
In there it states the power to the federal government (which is limited).
It further states the power is to the states—-and ultimately to the people.
My Question: Why can’t the federal government and especially obozo be sued
via a class action suit brought on behalf of the American people seeking to void
everything obozo has had implimented/signed/decreed or actions by his czars.
The American people certainly “have standing”.

Defund all czars … he should thank you … will save him the trouble of pink slip … look at the bad advice they have given him. Mine Gott In Himmel, four of the destroy Amercans earn more than our crumbinist in chief.

PS1 … When the media says 30 some new czars plus the ones he inherited from Bush, they don’t say how many.

So, does anyone know how many total czars and are any of the total viable?

Oscar Dar, it is frustrating to read post such as yours but no answers or suggestions as to how to go about it. Perhaps you can start the way and we can follow.

You comment should be written in every paper and on every TV and radio station in this country. People need to be educated with the truth even if it has to be shoved down their throat; so to speak.

Or Gore in one.

You have no idea what a Ponzi scheme is. You have less of an idea about what socialism is and how it works.

I agree people will not take care of nothing they do not work for. You are right besides all the up keep will take more than it is worth. Another thing if we have no jobs how do they think people will pay rent even if subsidized. He has lost his mind and everyone else are not making decision to help America. We are going down the tubes fast. VOTE HIM OUT.

Chuck, great post — I am copying it — hope you don’t mind.

Audrey nice try… but Barry knows exactly what he is doing because his so-called friends have been “coaching” him and leading him around the “track” for years!