A backlash has begun against an Indiana Supreme Court ruling that homeowners have no right to resist a police officer’s illegal entry but can argue it later in court.

State lawmakers are seeking a change in the state statutes and asking the court to make the judges fix the problem themselves.

A constitutional expert contends the moves are needed, because the court’s arguments essentially are the same as the idea that “someone can’t use a firearm to protect himself from someone who is threatening to kill him.”

A later argument over such use of a firearm might very well be of no help to the person who wanted to protect himself, the expert, Herb Titus of William J. Olson, P.C., Attorneys at Law, told WND today.

Continue reading on www.wnd.com

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Uncategorized
Previous post

Failed Judgment Day preacher hospitalized with stroke

Next post

Solar-powered plane on second international flight